The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
MmmIIob 3 s m Mm & M s* . to the W u m K ^ S jm S S B L The shift la eaphasis of 8ysta« pftUqr reflected by the sufcstitutioa of *correcting disorderly situations* for •aaintaiaing orderly conditions* is tha Goveraaaat security market into la foot only part of a breeder m u f t f i i n t of tbs role the central bank caa oad should j>lay la that laarfcet* Other policy notions growing out of this reasaesaseat were tha limitation of S^stm Account transaeticas to Treasury hills (exeest to eorraet disorderly conditions) and tho limitation of transactions solely to the purpose of sapplyiag bank reserves (agaia, oxse^t to oorroot disorderly conditions) • As a corollary, tha System also eease& providing any tyre of diroot mrket sugrpert for T r n f n y offerings of it# securities* And there not explicit recognitioa that tha aew doctrine meant that tho Syataai would have ao concern with iatoraat rates in tho ordinary conuet of its credit policy* The s h if t la a s t a s i a to *e o rree tia t disorderly situ a tio n s* la i t s e l f would aot havo preela4ed rogul*r operations la se c u ritie s other thas Treasury h i l l a , designed to a ffo o t tho a v a ila b ility ®acl soot o f oroa.it* Sat i t would preclude operations la other se c u ritie s to influence th a ir p rices except when auoh operations vers considered necessary or desirable fo r tho promotion o f tho ob jectiv es o f cre d it policy* Tho doolaioa to traiSo only i s b ills # however, together with tho decision to operate s o lo ly fa r tho parpee# o f s ffe o tin g bank reserves, has e ffs c tiv e ly elim inated operations i s se c u r itie s other than Treasury b i lls except to correct disorderly aa**ot conditions ♦ la shorty the combined e ffe c t o f tM s decision has boon to elim inate a l l tran aaction s the purpose o f wiieh ia to influence aarfcet conditions unless d is order develops* It i« vary difficult to dofina either *orderly* or “ disorderly* condition ia tarsia that wuid be generally acceptable. One of the reason* for the shift of saphasis » i the difficulty of reaching agreement oa i&at was implied by the eoasitaeut to Mistilt orderly aarfcet conditions* Eariag i&e wa* sad the w r i f pouter years, tho maintenance of orderly aarket condi tions had some to bo understood fey aaisgr as y i i p w n with the “ pegging* of prises of Government securities, It aoed not, of course, h&re that nooning* In foot, prior to the entrance of tho halted St&too into Verld tftir XX, it wmg taken to signify only action to atsderate adjastsioiits la the market for Ooveyaaoat securities— for exssple, is the spring of 1937 and ia tho s?»oatiia following tlio outbreak of war in Boropo in September 1939# Operations ia tho lettor poriod were not limited to purchases at tiises of sssrfcel weakness, bat includod later reversal of tho transactions through aalea vhea tho wnilcot was sufficiently strong to absorb tha® readily* Boring sad after tho oar (op to the ti*e of the Tre&sury-Faderel Reserve *aooord*), however, federal Reserve open w i tst operatioae were at saost tlaoi influenced by tho objective of sreventlng Tiel^p *>* «h«yrfr lc®g^tot« securities fraa rising abivo predetenr±Qed-~«ltheugh not aliaor8 rigidly* fixed— -levels* It not t*is typo of operation that asd* it impossible for tho federal Reserve System to carry out its orodit policies with full offeotiveaese* Vhen investors offered securitiee for solo at tho •support prices,* tho Systsa was forced to stake purchases* even If such gmrehasos ware ia conflict with the objectives of its credit policies* Hits gave •tho markof tho Initiative ia doloraiydttg tho amount of Federal Reserve credit e*teased, and prevented offoetid® control over tha foneral availability of orodit by tha Federal Seaerve authorities* Aft** the *aceord,* the System regained the initiative in adjusting its open market o?>er*tions to the needs of the economy, bat fears of becoming inwolred in pegging operations again still colored System thinking* There was a general determination to awoid any action that sight be interpreted by the M ifeet fts evidence that pegging Had not W e n dropped completely* that is the principal reaeon for the shift of emphasis from "maintaining orderly oaifcot conditions* to "correcting disorderly situations** there still regains room for differences of oplmiom ae to whcm "disorderly situations* exist, but the area for differences of opinion is much less than was the ease with respect to *melmtalmi&g orderly conditions** The question of whether or not to sot should bo less difficult to decide and any action taken to correct disorderly conditions should in the market* bo subject to mueh lo s s If on effort Is to howerar, the ores of be misinterpretation made to cheek uncertainty and difference of and *second guessing* Incipient f’ isorder, o p in io is considerately widened* BM jjaat ^ j J p e e n l i M i , iMttMUifrt I p a J tf M jjM tlitt ta canflbat i f .aagsaj&aiUaJtotU^ grggr k .j^rfeg w .t ^eludigj: aorfcUop of jjg- the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting in H^roh 1953 adopted a procedural change in trading practices for the System Open Market Account which Halted suoh transactions exclusively to ehort-tera OoYorsaent securities, except for the correction of disorderly metfeet conditions* While the Committee action specified *short~term* securities, in practice the System Account has transacted business almost exclusively in treasury bills since the chsnfo in trading practices w i adopted* been in bills* All transactions in 1954 hare This limitation of open market operations reflected a belief on the part of a majority of the Federal Open H»rfc«t Committee that its adoption would encoura-e a broader, more independent, and more resilient market for Oowcrsment securities* m 4 ** A stu^r of tho battraan tin FO^oral Bx » rr< % « $ « & snd tha mrkst fo r G&vermmt saou ritias Had 'tom undartakan tsgr a s t m U I subeosmittaa o f tfe# fadar&l Opan Iferkst CcsBialttea during 1$92» ?&a st*b~ raport ©ooeludadi tb&t tha in stitu tio n a l im ^ g t t n ft t i and n*ffe«% organisation already id osristanea provided a sa tisfa c to r y foundation fo r tha d*r*alop»«nt o f a br«*td and fr a * market i s *&lo!i p rices m t i a t t m i ra tes would r e fle c t accurately tha undorlyins supply ***£ dsssand conditions a.ad therefore m u ld cerea&nd tha confidence o f iw rastara. I t vas concluded that tha p a rtia l* pation o f tha System Open Nmrfcet Ammmt in tha ssarket exerted a se rio u sly liia itin f influence on tha a b ility o f tha market sad tha d eeler organisation to function %a e ffic ie n t ly as they & igit* trading practises in tfea aarfcet for Oovermsent eeewrlilea require t o t tha private dealer firs* asetis&s tfea risks of price fluctuation inherent in a free aarket % ^asying tad aallia#, as principals, for their aim accounts* tha breadth of tha market and its ability to respoad rssillently to changing supply and dea&rid condition*, therefore, depend to considerable degree upon tha villingaaca and ability of deeler* to quote firm prices and to audeo asvtoet* (bay and sail) in voluige at cuoted prices* In turn. If tha dealers are to assuae the rides involved In s&aking broad markets and carrying positions, they m e t have confidence in tfeelr ability to gauge tha relative importance of tha various influences affecting tha s^rkat and to forecast tha price ds’ relopstente that vlll remalt .froe tbese influences* It m s the opinion of tha suhcoeftlttee, and this opinion sea accepted by a jmjorlty of tfes Federal Open Market Cesaslttee, that tha unlimited p*rtioipatien of the Federal &es#rve Sygtess Account in tom *a?fce% for n i i m i tBatarities iapeeed an unreasonable handicap on tha ability of tha markets* professionals to topprm&sm prlao aad yioX& -proai>oeto* Tho %ataa Account >soXda tho Xarfaal aiagla fclook of agrkotabla Covorsaasat aaoarltXe** Vboa it tradoa, it in ia & position ta asort aa ii&jawrtaat ittflaoaoo upon tho straota o of prlaaa m l jrialda* At tfea « k m trading for tho %atasn Aaaoaat it set jsotiratad by p^ltt aoaaidoratisaa* aa It tl>o trading for othor aeooaato, bet it aatorod into fa* broad poiioy f W y t M i that sly aot aXaaya bo prodiotabXe or *vta uadarataod fey tho aoaXara# So&» daaXora* thoraforo, argaosWmad tho i u W ooeatiitoo sad & aajoirity of tho FOdoraX Opoa Ka*fcot Caonittaa agrood— t&at if tho S^rtaa Aooooat ia sXXovod to o^oraio la *11 aoctors of tho aai^ot* bM particularly aboa it ©f*srat#a «ador iattsaatioaa to "aaiataia ordorly oondi- tloaag« unerrtaiaty ia fotiorad and tho viiUagaota of doaXora to M k t brood m vk a to la dirootly affactod* itagriag or m X lim by th* 8yat*a ioooaat ia tho Gov*raatfHt sacuritioa »*rk*t, ovaa If eonfiaod to iterWto'ra fellla, socoas&rily iaflaoaoot tho lovaX aad atraotaro of aomirity arioaa &ad yiolda* In additioa to tha dlroet offeot apoa % o total aapply of ooe^ntioi tad apoa th* raXnttvo availability of dlfforaat matoritiaa* the Fodorail ftMoi** orodit roXeaaod by parehaaoi or aaatffrtd If taloa affoista iha aa&dy of m nvp n A ttma tho XovoXa of imtoroot rataa# fiat it *aa tho o?iaioa of tho majority oa i&o FodoraX Opoa Mtifcai Cossnittaa that oforatioaa aoafiaod to Traaaury Mila# tho ahartoit.aatarily »oe^ritiea# w m X d &a*a tbo Xooat affoot aaoa tfea lovoX aafi »iruct»ro of prtoo aod yioXda* X© tha firat ?X*oa# it mw raatwaad Hfcai ahaagot ia © p m mstort iatafast rataa aad abort-torn aooarity yioXda roflaet mmey aaaditdoai ratkor thaa tho -^amusd far «a^ tapply of ca^itaX madaY^taXf «14o raago ia rafXootioa of aad t&oy oaa aova vithia a «ar%#t «of»ditloaa vlthoat mtorialiy affooting pri^oa of tho Xoafor mtaritiss. Xa tho aoeoad rX»oof the of tratilag is Troaaaif biXlm fey aanaarolal banka, ladaatrlal oorporo** tic*-** aa£ otfeara is saieh groator 4ay to day th&a tha volaaa of trading is Govarmaat Isaacs of longer &aturity, ftiarofora* * %at«& Aaooaat iraaaao- tioa of a gliroa also aadartakoa to aeooapliah a credit poller purpooo oaa bo oxooatod aoro ro&dlly, aad with loss diroet l&paat oa r&toa, la tho trootury M I X mrk#% *h«a la any otfeor aagaont of tho a**fc«&» Tha oolaloa to raatrlct iyataa opvrntioaa to froearoy bill# w»a sot *io**€t % Ito prepoaoata aa » limitation upon tha ability of tho fadaral ioaorvo 0y*.taai to portom it* priaasjr function aa a eaatral bank* l.o*# tfeo rocnlatiaa of tho ooat *a£ availability of o««#*eroiai bank orodit* It woo foXt that the doairod affaet of Symtm Aoaowat tYaaaaotlooo on haak raaarvaa eould ba aoeoa^iiahad a* roodily through im&aaotio&a ia Troa»®ry bill® ao la asqr oth^r aattirtty* tho aa®* tteo* tfcoy asepactad that la a l » m d out fraaly Ametloalai mart&oi tea ssoaaf* &**kat aoaALtloaa $«o&MMMft igr iystoas ep*rztim *0 twd tho roaultiac lavala of g b o r V t i m iatoraot rmioo ooold iaflaoaco tho torma of erodlt throughout tho raaturity estraciuro ia tho direction ladleatod % Floral Soaorva policy* thio would raauit froo ths arbiirago proooas It imi a»*ugie& would ba ««t la eaotlon fey alart daoiara and tradora whaaovor poroiotaat diaorofaacioa or rllifHlaii ftfpwod ta tho jaiUro of intaroat r&toa* tfe o v o fo r o * ©a th o b a a ia o f ®uoh a r f m o a t a * th e o o j o r l t y o f th a Fo*a® tu 1 O poa J te rfc o t d o a a s itto o © o a o iu d o d t h a t * l a th o l a t o r o a t o f p re a io tiu g a f r o o r O o ^ a n m a a t a o o a r lt la a m r f e a t f ^ s a a a l a g g r o a t o r b r a a d t h , d o p th , a a £ r o a lU o a a y , It t r c a o a o t io a * c o u ld a n d s h o u ld b o l i a i t o d o o n c la d o d , f fc r tfc o r * t h a t t h a S y s ta ® 1® n i p f t i i t W e fc arg o d b y l i m i t i n g o p « a a a r fc o t o p o r a t lo a a t o t i i c o a id b o a t b a d i * » th o a a « o ii*J a c to d a c d a X y fO T th o •^uarpoao o f a o p p ly la ^ o r a b a o r b la f b a a k r a a a r v a a * t o fr o a o u r y M i l a * «*» *f m tho fiaal turn of this m**tioa aeas*» to h*oo baaa o*.ra?ally designed t© briag ®at tho affirm tivo ftrgasania for tho polioy roforrod t®f oad to proviso no op ortunity for nogv tlva arguments, although it ia aot Xikoly that vaa tha intoatioa of tho Jolat Cosasittao* Hi# following paragrapha oontala a briaf dlooaasioa, although it w o not roqaoaiod, of tho nogatlva aldo* Tho roaaoaiag of tha majority of tho Fodoral Opaa Katfcot Causaltioo la limiting %at«tt Aeoom% traaaaatloaa to Troaoury M i l a aad ia Xiadtiag tho arpoaa of auefe tranaaaiiona to thoir affoot upoa bank roaorvoa woo not aeeoptad by all tho ®m&ora of tho Coamittoo* Xa tha viov of tho minority* It i<aa uawiao for tfeo Systoa to ootabllah a rigid eosfsitissaat to trado only ia blUf, although It vaa agrood that iraaaaationo la M i l a vow Id uaualXy accomplish tho Syatom'o parpoao* Farthsraoro, tho aiiaorlty w m H w thoaght It uftXikaly that tho ohaago In oporatiag psvoofeuroo wmld eatoftraXly Improvo tho broadth, dopth or roalXloaay of tho aarkat* and thoy holiovod HM»i tho limitations apoa tho typo aad parpoao of %ata» Account operations eopt Of im p lie d ®aoh too aarrow a eoa» tho central bank's function* Xa largo pari, tha aifforeaea of opinion grow out of differing ooa- oopta of tho aoy ia which tho Government aa^uritiaa market operate** Tha majority believed tho usarket could develop into a broad, imperaonal meshanlsa ia Vhieh gradaal aad orderly changes ia des®aa4 ami supply eoadltleoJi vould bo reflected ia equally orderly changes ia priooa aad yields, if oaXy tho System Account were out o? tha picture ao that doalara might rationalise thoir expec tations* Tho minority, oa tho othar hand, viewed tho market aa oa# ia whiofe tho isojor distarbiag forooa were tho so-called *nataral forces,* mot tho System Account* So long aa dealers perform tha dealer function the acceptance of risk 1® unavoidable* Tho principal uBceriftirrty orootod by tho Federal Fes^rve System stasis from tiia possibility of shifts la it a baoio policy not f3rc» the areas of the market la w^.ich It might operate* In fact, it In roiaonafcle to beliere th? t from tto* to tlsse the possibility of Syete* assistance to tho aarket, when needed, might well encourage dealers to aske broader saarkata than they otherwise would* Another pert of the disagreement within tho Federal Opoa Market Cojsaittee staussed fro® differing interpretation# of the role a central beak should play* Th# minority members beHevcd that the raepoasibilitic# of tho Federal Beserve System aay not always be siet by System Account trensactiosa Halted to Treaeury M i l e nor by parpoooa Halted to the effect oa bea t reeerves* Diroot operation# la other sections of tho ssarfcetKy si times be the isost offin dent or only method by which a desired effeot on condition# in the credit sad capital anrfceta oaa bo achieved* the record of tho Govonneat securities market indicates that M&rbitrago> m y not bo relied upon aa a dependable means of r e a l i s t aa objective la the longer mfcurltiea through transactions la hills, Host important, the minority argued that the Hesitation to trading in treasury bills wae aa unnecessary restriction npoa the Qystcm** freedom of action* 8y adopting a particular operating preoediire aa a rale of conduct, tho System has needlessly created a situation wherein any operations outside the rale, no Matter how worthy the imrpose* will truly create uncertainty and confusion in the market* In the opinion of the minority ae&bera, tho federal Heserve System has of its own volition Halted its capacity for flexible central berating action to preaote economic stability* W m t iUHjBMtt th» f’ O wcoaritm* -dtte tamo far with the m»3»r thli p o licy of limiting System Account operations to treasury bills has, on the whole, been fairly satisfactory* It ahould bo aotod, hovorar, fch* t la tho porlod aiaeo M&mb if53 tboro h*ro booa only a few ooeaaioao on wich it in at & U likoly that any difforoat typo o? operation aoaldl haro hsoa uariort&kaa, had tho policy not boost adoptod, Tho ability of tho fodoral Boaorvo Qystoa to aaiat&ia tho doairod dogrea of cotivyol orar tho a&grogato rolnao of aasahor bask roaorvo bolaacoa waa aot affootod V tho aooiaioa to opor&to oxelaaivoly is hill#. If it ho «eco?tod that Sy^toa Account oporatlono should ho sndortakon axolusivoly for tho purpoao of adding to or l&kiag m m f fro® mahor honk m t t r n in tho aggrog&to* then Fodoral Soaorro o o u aark«t oporatioaa hava offoctivoly achlorod ihair ssaraooo* .|pwan» ip Bat# is & sense, thia fcoga tho suoatios, oiaoo aaooptaaoo of *&oh a limitation cm tho Xogltia&to parpoaoa of Systa* opoa aetrkat opor&tioag pro** cladoi oosaidaratioa of tho ‘ ueation of ahothor tho Syatoa oaa faily ^taohargo It* raapoaatMlltlo* ssoroly by rogalatiag tho miaao of baak roaorvoft* If tho %ataa*a r aapoaaihilitioa aro sera broadly coacai^od to eoapriao taking f ahataror aotloa m y ho raquirad, vithia tho liadta of ita authority, to prow?to tho condition# ia tho erodit and eapital aarkata most ooadanivo to ooonos&a ataMlity and pro.ro as, thora may ho room for >faoatloi*iJS§ wfcotbar tho a a r m t y rostrietod typa of opoa mmr&vt opor&tioa hat aeooapliahad all that could mao* fally haro boon dono la all clrcaaataacoa# tho aaavor to thia caoation *1X1 dopaad sot oaly upon assumption* vith rogferd to tho rolo and r^apoaaifeility of tho oontral bank, bat alao apo& rsryiag iatarpratatioaa of actual davalopBsonia* l^&rthoraa#ft, it ahould ho raaaabarod that tho roatriotivo poXici*a hoiag follow? W tho Fodor&l flaaorro B?$tm at tha timo tho limitation oa oporrtioa* vas adopted, ia *sr«h 1953, aooa bogan to shift toward a policy of acttva oa»o and that ordinarily aituatioaa calling for Syaiaa transaction# ia aocuritie# fttttiM f tfeaa k i l * a r a la a a l i k a l y p n & a d a nh«a r a a ir i£ t i? a t o a f ia a i d p a r ia d a o f aajgr a o a o y th a a l a a ra d & t p a ila ia a & *a l a a ffa « t* Burial tha pario* of aarfeat iaiarbaaaa fca ilui lati Tpnllitf U m m * » • W 5 3 # ther® n»r* good t ** %h& of Stop and far bsliaidag that ofnara** 0r»tiK Opaa tfarkat ieaaa&t ia saearitiaa athar thaa t & U a aig»t )UNi fraaa aara sffaotiaa in ( ^ ^ l a g tha rapid ptaMfet&f of aaaurity priaaa ll Ifittt U b b « without ralaaiag asy ^*** f*daraX 8 # w m aradit than «»i »n%li11j ralaaaad, tad &***&apa laaa. Sarar&l Inftuaneoa feara upm tfaa m&©atia~ ftwrlH7 eos^itifl®# ia tka Mikott tfea Xaa$*tara 3 X/4 par caat feaada a d * fwr -'x-%^3ipfljfp^1Lr M U aa May 1 had tradad ata&dily At disaataita froa par aiaaa bafara tbair iaaua dataf tha t raaaary had hmd aa unfarorabla ratpcmaa to it# big rafim&big af ;jigl|*laatag m 4 bm >ia ia tlia Xaat half of M f | a»4 tha m i aarilfiaataa had fallaa ta a diaaanat feafara iaaaa$ it Ii&d baaossa loeraa»ta*iy apparaat that bt “* v fettl traiiiiry had uadaraatiaatad ita «»sh aaada (p*rt5^mXariy aftar tha tiaaay - attrition ia tha rafandir**} and tha a&la of a aaw laaaa of Saptaafear tax ftotiaijkatios feUla addad ta the praaa&ra* 1% tha aaitoatf aad atatanaata by ^faaaiisfy and % s t a a affieiala d&riag tha spring aaatiia had lad tha sas&ai ta aaaaiala that **af* kit&#r iataraat vataa vara ia praapaot* It aaaaot ba n i l paaitivoiy at tbia diatasaa that parafcaaaa of bonda (and parfeapa par^iaaaa af ^ a fi#*ta ta tha oartifiaata raf&adiag) v«ald haaa §*rava»tad or irraatXy radsaaad tha jsri&a aroaiaa that oaaarrad, tat m r l e t aoureaa at tha tiasa iadiaatad that ainima p N l aaaa af tbia aart vaald bara W a n viavatl fey tha marfcat aa ft «i|H that tfea % g t a » aaa dafiaitaly aaaearaad and iataadad ta ahaak aa^r tan^attffy far tha ssa^cat to baaaaa prograaai^ly Ugfet«'r* It la avi4aatf howaaarf that fWfefctaa af M X I a far % a t a * Opaa Marleat Aaaoant «ad tha aaa af ripmralia.ai a p M M a t a (Ull ourehasea aad rapar^aaa agraaaanta aggrage tiag Bora than ~ 11 ~ Ji§ tallltei dollar* vara oatorad iato botnooa May U «ad M»y If) war# not auffieiaai to turn tha ttdo ^rior t© V* * h a a f g r a a a ir a parohasa of asoro than SO a&XUoa dollar* of Hilo «t tho bottcw of tfco m a rk a t on fuooday* Jfca* I* !**» on that day* smch of ih* r**i»toaoo to Jh* doeHs* gray oat »f th* ajtaoltanaou* narahaaa 3*5 aillisa of loa$»tom bona* for fro*oary *eao^aia* fteara vara w&doo^road remora that thosa vurefeaaea vara ia largar aaoirnt and w r o actually ?** ifeo %«is» Opaa K&tfeot Account* It ban boon rojjortad that ' tfeaaa fallaoioao rsssora war* at Xoaat la part roopoaaiblo for tha oarfeot** tWMfoaad mM reooraty* m tom qam l Aaothsr* though la s* # N ^ s t oooaotoa «haa transaction* la #*cn ri~ tiaa athar th*a bill* ss&^tii bar* ®»da an la£»ort*$t sontribatioa toward tha broad of aim o f 0ystoa policy a aarlaa of a a ca ritia * had Ia r § * ba*& in tfeo sharply rsdaaad was 6?#r tha rolaao 4* o f ahort-tarw tha Kaoorvo Syaioa had tha saddan, sharp tfeaafi tho * 4 *4 to tha iata m od iata a a ta rity nrnga* IIW H m *ho**« to so ta a ilv latoadod* vhilO it ratoa on iatosaaadlato and loagor*4ar& iaasaa taadod to H*o* radarul aa tha »pa<5o o f a fair ooathi# v h ilo roon lt tma a *fearp daoliaa o f ahoiHNtom y la ld * dterint: tha airin g aewth* i raault Tro«*u*y < 1 la r a l* ladlaotiais aaalair aoaar \ / 1?54* spring ooath* o f rofaading os>orationat o<?ni*al*9ott volama o f iasaas 11 aroaa at thia tiao to halp tha aarteot If tha ad|tt*t to la tha atractura of outstanding mturiiia* by galling *hort»tom tosao* on ****** afaiaat tntarttodlatoa, tha iranaiiton to * loagor mmm§* m aturity t l m of rata* la than tha Yf*ft*aiy MMk i l # actually davalopad* and tha *a rk *i boan sonaidarably broador# Hat thi* cannot of judgjasnt. bar* baan o ff*o t*d * lth l«aa d la i* * » bo proved, tboa and later It might hara s»at ra^ala a aattor 1 2 »*■ It m s no tad aarii# r that tho p fia e lp * ! ?sdaraX Opoa lfcvteot Sos®&ttoo to ooafiaa s<aa*14sr*tt*ft I t s oporatioas tha Xaadiaf i# Tmsurjr bill# ass the dosirs to otlmloio groator broadth* daatli, and rosiliosoy la a fro* varfcat* 4f»ilaUi ovidottoo voald iadio&to thot farth*rod***t Xmmt not rooopiXsmblywby tlio ©bjootivo thin oacal^alon of tho h«» not firsts* boaa Memm% tv m m& trsnaaotiafia aatsld* tho M i l e»*rkot# At portad# i#oa tho mrfcot has had particularly diffioalt adjaaiaont* to aafcaf c& m m ts bsro boon rocoivod fraa dosXors m6 oi& *rs t o t sossa aa&istsaea froa tho ^ratoa might tealp to graaoto feraadsr trading* It has boon sold ttsut aggrsgpit# doaXor *paattios*a* (tHo i&TOntorlas *tii sh tofXooi tha a-tftots at*o actually too*Sos«j o*Xy* shrink in tho faco to hm providing son ttiM ti*# tfeiXo broador thia aarkots p rin cip al and and mora bro&ath of to afetah tho .ptafasaioasis ob& to tho mttsot) haoo now dosrsXopasnts a# so proof froa tho ifa ta a (porfespa ta k la t promotsd a «£i®at tha ssa feo abjaotira policy of «!AX%m of sm#s) aaaXI aaitost* tho ooAtlxmod oosasioaal air paokots Xo&ds m r o and ©or# offorod t o t ooomslanai asalataaoa fora Xarf# Xy satisfactory «bo »h€3rw» **Jes to tha a s ts a ily bars aslstftssa of oonoladoa that tris o f tha ahaags ia sxslloy bat aot f a t boon attained* * «uito uadoratandabXy, tho t*oal*rs tand to rodaco thair hoX??in£S and to book aw*3r frsa offarln&s (if drappie# thoir bid <?*«oiatlooa) Hfeost tondossaias toward vaakaass as*fsaar ia tho mr^ot* and to incroaao thoir holdings aa# rsisa thoir b|4» afcaa tho aantoi jfeas* strength* Obviously this it* tha way far dsslsrs to as*t*Ass thair prafits, bat It tand# to sooastmta tha itisfafi ia pricas a a d to disoomrnia 'bread sad aeilvo trading by insraaiora* It la at Xoast arguable th«t participation by tho Opoa Markot Account, to tho extant of halting to adjust nRaroaaasa of sappiy-dtasaad relationship ia tha rsrloaa mtaritioa, vsaXd toad to aXXori® to taa^rary distortions is the @ar^ot and bolp to r re&oto ^ r«rk#t of gro&tor 4dapth, troadtfe, oa^ r^aiXiaaor*9