View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

tj.

BOARD OF G O V ER N O R S
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
W A S H IN G T O N

O FFIC E

OF THE

January 19, 195>1 •

Dear Mr# President:
I am enclosing the memorandum which you
asked me to send to you, the subject of which we
discussed this morning#
I have already discussed it with Charlie
Wilson#
Respectfully yours,

Thomas B# McCabe#
The President
The White House

Enclosure




C H A IR M A N

January 18, 1951*
E M O R A N D U
TO:

The President

FROM:

Mr. McCabe

SUBJECT?

Necessity for dealing
■with the causes of
inflation.

In the past six months we have given top priority — and rightly
so — to a reassessment of our international position, and to the develop­
ment of a comprehensive military program.

We have given urgent considera­

tion to procurement problems and production problems.

Now that these pro­

grams are launched, the next order of business must be to work out a com­
prehensive program for maintaining the integrity of the dollar.

Inflation

is our Number One unresolved problem today.
The strong upsurge of prices over the past several months drama­
tizes the potency of current — let alone future — inflationary forces.
If it is in order to contemplate such heroic measures as a complete
freeze of wages and prices across the board, is it not equally in order, and
essential for the long-run, to initiate simultaneously emergency action on
the fiscal and credit fronts?

For example, I suggest that you might ask

John Snyder to explore the practicability of an emergency tax measure — one
that would jolt the country and stop this inflation psychology in its tracks.
More drastic action on selective credit controls (Regulations ¥ and X, and
margin requirements) plus emergency restrictions on loan portfolios of
insurance companies, banks and other lenders would help to curb inflationary
credit expansion.




To be enacted quickly, these measures might have to be

- 2 crude and should be temporary.

But they would provide time to work out a

more carefully evaluated program.
No dam of wage and price controls alone can be expected to with­
stand pressures of the magnitude that are in sight.

Increased income re­

sulting from defense spending m i l be far in excess of goods available for
civilian purchase.

The outstanding volume of bank and other credit is

more than enough to finance the entire economy even at forced draft.

Fully

as important is the current movement to convert liquid assets into land,
equities, and commodities, the so-called Mhedge against inflation.«
movement is well under way and is gaining momentum.

This

It feeds on itself.

It will accelerate with any further rise in the inflationary spiral and
will accentuate the spiral.

The volume of liquid assets already out­

standing is out of all proportion to the needs of the economy.
Inflation is not inevitable.
I suggest the Defense Mobilization Board immediately concentrate
on a study of all problems of inflation control.

The study should be

just as comprehensive as that given to the requirements of military mobili­
zation.

The problem is much more coup H e a t e d and much more urgent than

it was at the beginning of World War II.

I doubt very much whether it

will be solved by minor adjustments in fiscal policy, in debt management
policy, or in monetary and credit policy.

We need a complete reappraisal

of what is involved in credit and financial mobilization for a fullscale
defense effort.

I think it would be fatal to repeat the mistakes

of World War II financing.




As you so clearly and correctly pointed

- 3 out last Fall, wDuring World War II we borrowed too much and did not tax
ourselves enough.

We must not run our present defense effort on that kind

of financial basis*11 You and the Treasury have already taken an heroic
stand in this emergency to press for a f,pay-as-we-go,f tax program, and the
suggestions made here are for the purpose of strengthening your hands.
We cannot forget that the American economy was subjected to a
major inflation in spite of the harness of direct controls applied during
the last war.

That program broke down rapidly when hostilities ceased.

As soon as the harness was removed the pent-up demand of the swollen money
supply, which resulted from the war financing methods, broke loose in a
tremendous inflationary tide#
Active consideration is being given to building a dam of general
price and wage controls in the hope that they will stem these forces.

I am

profoundly convinced that such a dam alone — and at this time — will not
suffice.

It should be part and parcel of a broadscale carefully integrated

program not only of direct restraints on spending but also fiscal and credit
measures to lock up demand.

Otherwise it may actually compound the problem

by precipitating widespread hoarding as the freeze on automobile prices
has already done.

A general freeze on prices and wages creates an illusion

of anti-inflation security.

By itself it does not deal with the fundamental

cause, namely, a volume of money demand arising out of increasing incomes,
credit expansion, and out of liquidation of assets that is greatly excessive in
relation to goods available for sale.

The inflationary flood which threatens

to engulf us must be stemmed at the source.




T H E W HITE H O U SE
W A SH IN G TO N

January 2h>

Memorandum fori

Honorable Charles E. Wilson

From:

The President

I am enclosing a memorandum from Tom McCabe
I understand he has already discussed this subject
■with you.
This memorandum seems to me to be basically
sound and in line with what we are trying to do, I
believe your organization is the proper place for
getting the interested departments and agencies to­
gether to consider such matters as this.
I believe that the Council of Economic
Advisers can be of particular help to you in consider
ing these matters, and I hope that you are calling on
them regularly. I also believe that there may be
some agencies of the Government not represented on
your Board who have particular interest in some of
these questions — as, for example, Ray Foley in the
housing field.

Enclosure.