View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Form F*. R. 131
B □ AR D D F G O V E R N □ RS
□ F TH E

FEDERAL

RESERVE

SYSTEM

Office Correspondence
Mr. Ecoles

Date May 141 1938,
Subject:.

From______ Mr. Draper

Please do not think I am going to keep bombarding you
with congratulatory messages.

But I cannot refrain from

saying that I think your address in Atlantic City to be the
clearest and most effective presentation of a confused situation
which I hare read since coming to Washington in 1935.
Ify

only suggestion — which has nothing to do with the

speech proper — is that in the future you might give thought
to preparing a 4 or 5 page digest of your remarks for the
press so that the high lights of sash an important address will
not get lost in the shuffle. The Washington Post, for instance,
quoted only that part of your address applying to bank examina­
tions and omitted entirely the real heart of your lucid argument.
There ought to be some way to circumvent reporting like that and
maybe the above suggestion would help.




May 16, 1958,
Governor Draper
Chairman Eccles




You may be sure your messages are more than
welcome, especially when they are as encouraging
as the one with reference to my talk in Atlantic
City*
On occasions in the past 1 have attempted to
have digests made, but the trouble with that is
that most of the newspaper men want the full text,
and anyway will write their stories from the full
text« They are inclined to be suspicious of di­
gests or to feel that an effort is being made to
usurp their functions to play up whatever they
choose«
The story you mention with regard to ex*
aminatlons is what, X understand, is technically
known as a "special** that is, a separate story
sent out by press associations dealing with some
one part of a speech« This supplements general
stories covering the speech as a whole* is to
whether the press association report dealing with
the whole speech shall be used or just the special,
or both, is, of course, a matter of editorial judg­
ment— poor judgment, it seems to me, in this in­
stance*