View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Form sr. r . 181

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

OfAce Correspondence
jQ

Chairman Eccles

Date March 11, 1956
Subject:

Attached is a brief statement of the arguments for a tax
on undistributed corporate earnings, and also a statement of the
arguments against it that appeared in the Annalist, with replies to
those arguments.




This material was prepared by Mr. Currie.

March 11, 1956.

ARGUMENTS FOB A TAX ON UNDISTRIBUTED CORPORATE EARNINGS

The proposed tax on -undistributed corporate income would:
1.

Close up one loophole through which the incomes of the wealthy

have escaped the individual income tax.

To the extent to which the

incomes of the wealthy have been left undistributed with corporations
our tax system has departed from the principle of taxing according
to ability to pay.

It is estimated that if all corporate earnings were

distributed in 1936 additional income of nearly $3,000,000,000,of
82,000 individuals having incomes of over $25,000 per annum, would become
subject to individual income tax rates.
Zm

Raider more difficult the accumulation of enormous fortunes.

If large incomes were really subject to taxation at the present high
surtax rates it would be more difficult to amass a great fortune.

One

could, it is true, evade taxation by investing in tax-exempts, but it
would be difficult to amass a fortune in this way.
5.

Discourage growth of uneconomic bigness.

It is at present

advantageous for salaried executives and large shareholders to retain
earnings in a corporation in order to make their position more secure
and to evade taxes.

There would be a closer calculation of probable

costs and returns if shareholders were asked for new money before expansion was undertaken.
4.

Discourage growth of monopolies•

At present our tax system,

by encouraging the retention of earnings by corporations, offers an
inducement to use such funds to buy up other and competing concerns.




-2-

Moreover, in securing an interest in other corporations not purchased
outright, encouragement is given to the adoption of policies that lessen
competition.
5. Weaken despotic control by management and ''insiders**

The

power to withhold earnings is a contributing factor to "insider* control*
Without the power to withhold earnings ability to expand would depend
upon the ability to borrow or issue new stock.

With the publicity in

connection with registering new stock issues with the S. E. C., stockholders would be in a position to learn much more about the operations
of their corporations.
6.

Benefit small investors by —

(a)

virtue of the fact that the

corporate income tax to be removed is higher than the normal income tax
most individuals would have to pay on dividends, (b) having new expenditures of their corporations based on more economic grounds than at present,
(c) enabling them to learn more about their corporations in connection
with the more frequent new stock issues that would result.
7.
prices.

Exercise a stabilizing effect on the general level of stock
Instead of a steady appreciation of stock prices in reflection

of the growth of earnings resulting from investment of undistributed earnings, stock prices would be kept down through the frequent issue of new
stock to finance expansion.

Although the profitability of stockholders1

investments would be very little affected, the psychological reaction is
likely to be much more healthy if the general level of stock prices is
thus kept down.




-5-

8.

Aid la the effectiveness of monetary control*

Judging from

recent experience in the initial stages of recovery, corporations
interpose a drag on recovery by building up cash holdings.

At such

times disbursement of full earnings would be constructive.

In the

later stages corporations spend the great bulk of retained earnings in
plant and in purchase of other securities.
movement.

This intensifies the upward

At such times disbursement of earnings and their subsequent

partial recapture by the Federal Government for the purpose of retiring
the national debt would be a restraining factor.

In the initial down-

turn there is reason to believe that corporations increase their cash
holdings.

While the payment of unearned dividends in the later stages

of depression is a moderating factor, it is probably of minor significance.

For all non-financial corporations in the years 1950-1952 the

payment of unearned dividends less undistributed earnings amounted only
to $2,734,000,000.

Since part of this small amotuat went to other cor-

porations and part was undoubtedly used by wealthy investors to retire
debt, to purchase existing securities and to build up cash holdings,
the net addition to the current demand for goods and services was very
small.

The bad effects at other times outweigh the good effect in a

very bad depression and, indeed, help to bring about such a depression.
If we have to choose it is better to choose something that tends to
prevent a depression from developing rather than something which may
operate to ameliorate a depression, particularly as the ameliorating




-4-

effects appear to have been of minor significance in the worst depression
on record.
9. Aid recovery now.

Since corporations have more cash than they

have had before, a further retention of earnings now merely means further
piling up of idle cash, or a further liquidation of indebtedness, both of
which are dampening factors on the recovery movement.
10.

Raise considerable revenue# particularly as recovery proceeds«

and permit, first* a balanced budget and« later, substantial debt retirements.

It does this, not by imposing new taxes but, rather, by making

present tax rates effective.
11.

Be superior to the alternative tax proposals suggested.

The

alternatives, for the most part, would tend to make our tax system more,
rather than less, inequitable.

One great merit of this tax is that the

people who benefit most in money terms from the recovery would pay most
of the cost, which is only fair.

The tax would compensate for the rise

in profits relative to wage rates•