View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ForevF. H. 131

B O A R D OF

GOVERNORS

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

O f f i c e

C o r r e s p o n d e n c e

To

Chairman Eccles

From

Henry Edmiston

Date

March 22, 191+0

Subject:

Attached is a discussion on the apparent results of the
March income tax collections and the Secretary1 s comments with
regard to thenu




March 2J, 19I+O
HE
MARCH IHCOME TAX COLLECTIONS
The reports on income tax collections through March 20 indicate
that receipts for the month are likely to be between $660,000,000 and
$670,000,000, as compared with our estimate of #650,000,000 and the
Treasury estimate in the Budget Message of about 1550,000,000. The fact
that the actual results appear to have exceeded even our estimate leads
to the following conclusions:
!• It appears that our estimate of the Treasury balance of
#1,250,000,000 at the end of June of this year will be realized, provided,
however, that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation sells about #150,000,000 of guaranteed notes in April or May.
2. The Treasury will have to write up its estimate of income
tax collections for the three remaining quarters of this year. Although
1 doubt that new Treasury estimates will show a balance on June 30 a s high
as our figure, it should be substantially above the amount which Bell has
been using in the recent discussions of prospective financing*
Any proposal to raise cash in June through sale of direct
obligations would appear to be completely unjustified. In case the Treasury
continues to underestimate the cash balance, the recent experience can be
cited to cast doubt on the accuracy of their estimates for the future.
The Secretary, in discussing the March income tax collections
with the Press, said that they are running ahead of the budget estimate by
a "comfortable margin" but he refused to give the actual Treasury estimate
for March alone. He said, however, that there is not tfa chance in the
world11 of increases in Federal revenue over estimates making up the $!|60,000,000 which President Roosevelt suggested in his Budget Message that
Congress should levy in new national defense taxes. The New York Times
reported that Under Secretary Bell, who was present at the press conference,
reiterated that there was no possibility of making up the $lj.60,000,000
sought in new taxes through excesses in revenue over estimates. Actually,
of course, our tentative estimates of receipts for this calendar year are
about lli-50,000,000 above the former Treasury estimates as indicated in the
budget. This increase is, of course, mainly in income taxes but it also
includes about $80,000,000 additional from customs receipts and a small
amount from various other taxes.
The Secretary also said that he was keeping his "fingers crossed"
until the March returns have been analyzed, because perhaps more people,
particularly the State employees who are paying Federal income taxes for
the first time, may be paying the full amount rather than availing themselves of the tjuarterly installment payment plan. This would indicate
that the Treasury will probably not write up their receipts estimates for




-

2

-

the subsequent quarters as much as is probably justified^ While it may be
necessary to revise our estimates of receipts for the rest of the year
when we see the analysis of the March returns, it appears unlikely that we
will have to write down our estimates of income taxes for the rest of the
calendar year#
The Secretary, in this same press conference, also took occasion
to say that he was not "going to use any trick method11 with the Stabilization Fund to keep from exceeding the debt limitation and stated that he
would not worry if the limitation were raised to even #50,000,000,000• He
declared the matter was clearly the responsibility of Congress and should
be dealt with in a "perfectly legal and open way"* In other words, the
Secretary shows Congress and the country that he is conservative and, by
implication, places the onus of adopting unsound fiscal policy on the
President or other members of the Administration should they decide to
advocate that Congress should authorize the use of the Stabilization Fund
to retire debt»