View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Form F. R. 131
BOARD • F

GOVERNORS

FEDERAL RESERVE

SYSTEM

Office Correspondence
To

Chairman Eccles

Date yflhmnry ?.Q, ItKQ
Subject:

Bmile Desnres

On Saturday morning I attended another meeting
a t Secretary W a l l a c e ' s o f f i c e , a t which Messrs. E z e k i e l and
G i l b e r t were a l s o p r e s e n t . The discussion d e a l t p r i n c i p a l l y
w i t h G i l b e r t ' s m a t e r i a l on the business o u t l o o k , but a t the
close of the discussion the Secretary said t h a t although i t
had been decided t o await t h e P r e s i d e n t ' s r e t u r n before
presenting recommendations to him, he wanted t o have a f u l l y
developed set of recommendations on tap f o r use a t the opportune t i m e . He asked G i l b e r t to o b t a i n Secretary Hopkins'
views concerning t h e r e l a t i v e p o l i t i c a l f e a s i b i l i t y of the
measures enumerated on pages 3 , 4 , and 5 of the attached
memorandum, and he asked me t o f i n d out your judgments on
t h i s p o i n t . He s a i d t h a t i n h i s discussion w i t h Secret&ry
Hopkins, Secretary Jackson, and you, the consensus was t h a t
the program should be cut down to t h e bone.
E z e k i e l has asked me t o come to h i s o f f i c e tomorrow
morning t o help i n drawing up a new memorandum.

Attachment

£0




ECONOMY, DEBTS. AND BUSINESS
Aside from p o l i t i c a l maneuvering, the current economy or i r e i n
Congress i s based upon two factors* ( l ) The b e l i e f t h t business i s
improving and w i l l continue to improve under the stimulus of war orders,
(<) The c o n v i c t i o n t h t increased public debt i s dangerous, coupled
w i t h an unwillingness t o increase taxes i n an e l e c t i o n year.
These f a c t o r s should change s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n the ne«r f u t u r e .
Business a c t i v i t y i s already d e c l i n i n g sharply, and the dscline seems
l i k e l y t o continue t o considerably lower l e v e l s . This w i l l c h i l l the
recent o p t i m i s t i c expectations concerning business trends. Business
recession i n t u r n w i l l change the a t t i t u d e toward economy. Whatever
ths f e a r of expanding f e d e r a l debt, the f e a r of de^r^ssion i s greater.
A w i l l i n g n e s s t o spend f o r recovery w i l l develop as soon as t h i s f e s r
r e a l l y takes h o l d .
I t i s v i t a l l y important t h a t the a d m i n i s t r a t i o n be prepared t o
take aggressive measures t o h a l t the d e c l i n e . This w i l l demonstrate
t o the country ones more the a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s capacity f o r leadership
and i t s readiness a t a l l times t o develop the type of p o l i c y which
ths s i t u & t i o n demands.
The Business Outlook
I t i s now clear t h a t the surge i n a c t i v i t y since the outbreak
o f war was p r i m a r i l y reduction f o r inventory accumulation. Of ths
increase o f $1100 m i l l i o n s of investment expenditures which occurred
i n the l a s t quarter of 1939, inventory accumulation c o n s t i t u t e d #950
m i l l i o n s , or about 36jG. While investment i n i n v e n t o r i e s i s s t i l l going
on, i t i s sharply diminished. Th© other f a c t o r s &re not increasing
r a p i d l y enough t o o f f s e t t h i s decline and a c t i v i t y i s therefore f a l l ing o f f . The only question a t the present i s tha extent and duration
o f tha d e c l i n e .
The rosy views of business prospects were based on the f e l l upt u r n , which c a r r i e d the Federal Reserve index from 102 i n August t o
128 i n December. The Hew Tear was f o l l o w e d by a s l i g h t h e s i t a t i o n ,
and now l ^ m r r j has seen a d i s t i n c t slackening t o about 110 a t ths
present time. Present export, investment, and inventory prospects
lead t o an expectation o f f u r t h e r d e c l i n e , w i t h the bottom coming i n
mid-year o r even l a t e r , and w i t h the low p o i n t f a l l i n g between 80 and
100. The higher f i g u r e would hold i f there i s no inventory l i q u i d a t i o n
and i f exports axeeed 1939 l e v e l s by l } t o 2 b i l l i o n s . I f t w o - t h i r d s
of the recent a d d i t i o n s t o i n v e n t o r i e s are l i q u i d a t e d , and i f the exp o r t increase i s only 1 t o 1 b i l l i o n s , the lower l e v e l of A c t i v i t y
might be reached. At b e s t , the decline would c a r r y production and
employment back about t o where wa were before the war was declared
and a t worst would plunge us f a r l o * e r . Prompt a c t i o n i s c a l l e d f o r
i f the present decline i s t o ba cheoked before i t reaches such dangerout p r o p o r t i o n s .
1/
2 / Tha analysis o f investment and export rjorospects on which these b u s i ness forecasts are based i s given i n Appendix 1*



Had December l e v a I s been maintained, n a t i o n a l income would now
be running a t a 75 b i l l i o n d o l l a r l e v e l . Ins tend, i t i s now running
a t a 71 b i l l i o n l e v e l , and a»y touch - s low as a 65 b i l l i o n l e v e l by
mid-summer*
The recovery seems l i k e l y t o be resumed a t l e a s t by the f o u r t h
q u a r t e r , since inventory recessions, l i k e inventory booklets, are s h o r t l i v e d * Thr t recovery, however, w i l l roh&bly be ouch slower i n tempo
thaa t h e t of l a s t f a l l , and w i t h as much export stimulus as seems p r o bable w i l l hardly r i s e above 110 i n 1940, even i f the net c o n t r i b u t i o n
o f the Government i s not s i g n i f i c a n t l y reduced by budget slashing* \J
War demands, thus, have l i t t l s promise o f producing s u b s t a n t i a l
recovery* I f the war should end suddenly, however, there *omld Instead
be a disastrous collapse*
The Immediate Propram
The business outlook i s , thus, a choice between an immediate
s u b s t a n t i a l downturn, i f present budgetary and Congressional i n t e n t i o n s
are followed* or only a moderate downturn, followed by quicker recovery,
i f prompt f e d e r a l a c t i o n i s taken on an adequate scale.
The country i s a f r a i d of increasing debt, but i t i s n * t a f r a i d
o f f e d e r a l spending, and i t supports spending f o r p a r t i c u l r projects* &J
A new program of f e d e r a l spending without increasing the debt can be
developed by drawing on the several unspent reserves of the Treasury
and by expending some of the current a c t i v i t i e s on a s e l f - f i n a n e i n g
basis outside the budget. I n a d d i t i o n , several other forms of i n v e s t ment can be m a t e r i a l l y expanded w i t h only n e g l i g i b l e budgetary cost*
The only way to get expenditures increased q u i c k l y i s through
r e l i e f expenditures, the stamp plan, and F*S.A. I n a d d i t i o n , though,
ws have t o provide measures a t ones which are s l o - e r to take h o l d , i f
we are t o s a t i s f y the u b l i o insistance on an approach to budget b a l ancing* To do t h i s , we must show t h a t the immediate program covers
not only renewed d i r e c t spending, but also provides f o r an expanding
volume o f a c t i v i t y , which i s not based d i r e c t l y on f e d e r a l s ending
from ths r e g u l r budget*

}J

The a n a l y s i s o f investment and export prospects on which these
business forecasts are based i s given i n Appendix 1*
"ij See ths opinion surveys i n Appendix 2*




-3-

Elements p r o v i d i n g prompt stimulus t o consuxaptlon expenditures:
1 . Develop o u t - o f - t h e - b u d g e t f i n a n c i n g f o r
a c t i v i t i e s already under way.

self-liquidating

(a) Restore the W> m i l l i o n f o r R.S.A. back t o E.F.C.
f i n a n c i n g as proposed i n the budget.
(b) Authorize farm S e c u r i t y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n t o p u t
the best t h r e e - q u a r t e r s o f i t s r u r a l r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
loans and a l l o f the tenant purchase loans on a s e l f f i n a n c i n g b a s i s , by the sale of debentures t o 4.F.C.
or t o t h e p u b l i c .
($230 m i l l i o n s a y e a r , )
2 . Expand the ii.F.A. r o l l s t o three m i l l i o n s , and expand
M . f . A . and C. J.C. correspondingly, and from t i l l s l e v e l taper
o f f g r a d u a l l y as employment develops as an outgrowth of the
o t h e r measures.
3* Expand the stacep p l a n t o enlarge food and t e x t i l e
consumption of low-income groups.

i

4 . d u ^ t h e old-age j>s^r6XPtax by l/2$ u n t i l such t i n e
as old-age outpayiaents become equal t o t a x r e c e i p t s .
(The
old-age reserveisQriow adequate f o r contingencies. TJe can
a f f o r d a lower t a x r a t e u n t i l b e n e f i t payments increase j a t e -

5. The immediate increase i n expenditures can be maintained
w i t h o u t any a d d i t i o n a l borrowing by
(a) Drawing upon t h e cash balance o f the Treasury.
(b) Making f u l l use of the s i l v e r p r o f i t .
( c ) U t i l i s i n g some o f the g o l d i n the s t a b i l i z a t i o n f u n d .
Three b i l l i o n s could be drawn f r o m these t h r e e sources
w i t h o u t i m p a i r i n g t h e cash p o s i t i o n o r t h e o p e r a t i o n of t h e
s t a b i l i z a t i o n fund.

i / S e e Appendix 3* Section 1 .
2/^ee Appendix 3 , Section 2 .




Elements providing f o l l o w - u p expansion!
1.

I n t e r . s i f y e f f o r t s t o speed up p r i v a t e investment
i n housing. Hie f i e l d of low-cost housing i s
e s p e c i a l l y promising and the f u l l f o r c e of Government encouragement should be placed behind the d r i v e
t o promote i t .

a.

Exii&nd p u b l i c c o n s t r u c t i o n , w i t h the budget assuming
only the annual i n t e r e s t and amortization charge.
(1)

The 8.8.H.A, has demonstrated how annual grants
covering p a r t or a l l of i n t e r e s t and amortization
have enorraous leverage on the volume of investment.
Add an a d d i t i o n & l $500 m i l l i o n of construction to
ti^e U.S.H./u a u t h o r i z a t i o n a t an annual budget
cost of only
million.

(2)

The proposed h o s p i t a l b u i l d i n g program a i g h t
s i m i l a r l y be financed, on a g r e a t l y enlarged
volisue of c o n s t r u c t i o n , by a very small annual
appropriation•

Authorise a renewal of public works construction o f
the P . r . i U type, but based on annual subsidy of the
t!.?.H.A, t y p e , and w i t h l o c a l or f e d e r a l loans o u t side the f e d e r a l budget, 1 /
a.

Urge
shortenii
of b e n e f i t s Y
b e n e f i t s . ^ g / X ^ ^ i s would
l a r g e Increase i h s b e n e f i t pi
pressure i s needed t o taring
(Favored both by A.F. of L . and

5.

Correct the d e f l a t i o n a r y e f f e c t s cf the Social Security
program ( i n s o f a r as they cannot be eliminated by s docrease of p a y r o l l taxes and/or increase of b e n e f i t s )
by i n v e s t i n g the reserves i n s e c u r i t i e s t h a t represent
newly constructed works under the Governmentli investment
program, which would not otherwise be constructed. This
would meet the spurious but widely held view t h a t there
should be r e a l assets t o guarantee the S o c i a l Security
funds*

r

X / See Ap endix 3 , Sec. 4., f o r d e t a i l s
2 j See Appendix 3 , Sec. 3»




by
e rats
d u r a t i o n of
an imoedlats
t im iediats
n t u a l state a c t i o n .
.0.) 1 /

•• 5 *

6.

Broaden the e l i g i b i l i t y t o r e c e i v e old-age pensions,
by modifying the e l i g i b i l i t y l i m i t a t i o n s , p r e f e r a b l y
by granting a small pension t o - 1 1 r e t i r e d persons
65 or over. At present, h a l f of those over 65 who
paid old-age taxes are i n e l i g i b l e f o r b e n e f i t s because of t e c h n i c a l l i m i t a t i o n s . A /

7.

Reduce the annual budget charge f o r debt service by
modifying Treasury p o l i c y t o reduce i n t e r e s t costs
on the d e b t .
(a)

(b)

,

Use more s h o r t - t e r m m a t u r i t i e s and leBS long-term
bonds i n r e f i n a n c i n g maturing p u b l i c o b l i g a t i o n s .
(There i s no j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r s h i f t i n g t o l o n g term o b l i g a t i o n s m l e s a we believe the l o n g - t i m e
trend of i n t e r e s t r a t e s i s upward.)
Reduce the present l i m i t o f §10,000 a year t o one
purchaser o f Baby B.?nds, t o $1,000 a y e a r . (Tha
higher r & t e on these bonds c o n s t i t u t e s an i n t e r e s t
subsidy t o savors. Savings o f over $1,000 a year
cannot be made by low-income f a m i l i e s , and do not
deserve a subsidy.)
border-Vroam

O^Uffflfc

Unless measures such as those suggested above are taken, tha
longer-term outlook i s not b r i g h t . With any expenditures the b e l l i gerent 3 seem l i k e l y t o make here, and any u h l i c a c t i o n the budget
now p r o v i d e s , 1941 a t best w i l l be no more prosperous than 1937. Unemployment w i l l continue t o grow almost as f a s t as the number o f employables increases—600,000 a y e a r .
Evan w i t h a c t i o n along the l i n e s suggested, a longer-term
program i s necessary t o provide more fundamental t e c h n i ues both t o
increase consumption and s t i m u l a t e new investment. I n general, rsuch
a program must place more emphasis on increasing t a x a t i o n of income
which would otherwise ba hoarded, and on f e d e r a l support of s o c i a l expenditures which would otherwise be n e g l e c t e d . Such methods would make
i t p o s s i b l e t o approach a balanced budget w i t h s a f e t y . Possible elements
o f such a l o n g - t i m e program, and methods f o r p o p u l a r i s i n g i t t o tha p u b l i c ,
are presented i n Appendix 4 .

X / See Appendix 3 , Sac. 2 .




APPBIDIX I .
Tfca fhygtlxmam cut-J^po*
The decline o f busiaeas a c t i v i t y t h a t v* .a foree s t l a a t iioptaF.be?
is
» U under way* I t i s acr* «Xet*r t h a t the isurge i n a c t i v i t y oinee
the outbreak o f wir
baaed upon inventory aceretgOUtioa* Of the i n t r a a e t
o f $1100 a i U t o s o f investment expenditures
>®ourr&4 i n the i s o t
quarts*? o f 1919* Inventory a e m t u i e t t c a m m t i t t t t s d f9$0 a l l l lima o r sbeut
86 percent. Investment i n i n v e n t o r i e s I s s t i l l
on, but the ri>te o f
eeeeemlation I s i h a f ^ l f U ^ k M *
Ot^er Investment i s not Increasing
rapidly
to o f f s e t tfels decline and a c t i v i t y i s t h e r e f o r e f a l l i n g
o f f . The caly question a t t h e present tlsui i s the extant awt duration o f
the decline*
On an o p t i m i s t i c e a t t a s t e , n c c u a l n o inventory
und
as i»crsn<*e i n exports o f f l | - t o
b i l l i c n a year o v r r
the Feda^&l
Reserve adjusted index' i&ould decline f i a s ttec D c i s r b s r fei^t- o f 128 t©
100 i n the t h i r d e m r t e r j thi<? decline t i l l be a caane- uenee of t i e
ssssattcm o f iBv«iBtoty cocuMdLetlra rctl&er than juay a^sntt n t i a l t K w 8 « i « n
i n t i e l e s s v o l a t i l e inveetnent f n e t e r r u On s pccgtaiastle estin&te*
aawrat§ia& tfect apppcstiaetcly i - v - t h l r d a
the Inventories reeently M i s a *
l a ted w i n be l i
and t h a t satporte w i l l lMNPCf.se by
to
billion,
the
1 Reserve- isd^x <*U1 f a l £
-itf** j^r t^thb^'Slie©^ o f
in
i'sirquarter* At b e e t , the d e c l i n e would e&r*y pvoductioa
flsaploy^sat
about
beck t o triers we were before the war m e declared
a t were* wouIC plunks
us Par lower*
Bad Bccstj&ft? l e v e l « bests maintained, n a t i o n a l i&co-ac m m l d sow
be running * * a #75 b i l l i o n l e v e l * Instead, i t i n naming t% a #71 b i l l i o n
l e v e l and msgr touch as low m a |65 b i l l i o n l e v e l by r-td~*uw*er»
Cfcsrt I chocs the reside o f InvsctsMsat trends cm y&ieh tkeac
extruse eatla&tec are based «ad the intermediate t r e n d
between the
estrogen o f t h i s raago* The Indses of production t h r e a p
has also been
d r a m on t h i s chart t o sJ o* I t s clone r e l a t i o n s h i p t o the i n v ^ t - ent t o t a l *
taventorfo*
At the outbreak o f war, i s v e a t o r l a c wars s t i l l a t a
level9
As t t s up p e r - 1 a f t section o f Chart XX i&<-<rot t i e 193*5 d e c l i n e wiped out
cfcout 1 / 3 o f the 1934*193? ctrsaco* A f t e r
outbreak o f m r , i n v e n t o r i e s
&4fcaCo6 sharply tnd 'by fcbc end o f 1939 ^ e r e only ^ ->erc*at below the end
o f 1937 l e v ^ l *
Changes i n the p h y s i c a l vclu?.e o f I s r t t M M shov *v§n m r e
c l e a r l y t h e e l t u a t l o a e x i s t i n g a t the end o f 1939* The u p p e ^ r i ^ h t sect i o n o f Chart XI indScotes t h a t aoct o f the decline i n i n v e n t o r i e s
I n the l a s t q u a r t e r o f 1917 and the f i r s t h a l f of 193S* @laco & large
^roporti'••••• r-'' u.v 'incline i n value
due t o the deelir.e i n p r i s e s , the
d e c l i n e i n ?olue*e was «?ven d i a l l e r t l ^ n the decline In villus*
ths
middle o f 1938 t o t i e middle o f 1939, the Inereas* i n inventory roXwse was
r e l a t i v e l y sesall* A f t e r the ou*br@?%k of war, tiie rate of inventory ascu
l a t i c n ^na stepped up ra i d l y , and i n Bosorber i t vsjs as grm t as at any
t i s t * during t h e 1937 booklet*
the
o f the y e n r , the voius»e o f
inv«ttorlee
exseeded the 1957 peak*




At the present t i n e production s t i l l exceeds coneumption, and
i n v e n t o r i e s are s t i l l r i s i n g * As shown i n Chart I I I , production was
f a r above c o n s u m p t i o n i n the l a s t p a r t o f 1 9 3 9 * Since then, i t h&»
f a l l e n sore sharply than consumption and promises t o close the gap w i t h *
l a the next few months* The c r i t i c a l question i s w i l l inventory l i q u i d a t i o n occur when accumulation stops?
Our o p t i m i s t i c assumption i s based on the view, which i s widely
h e l d , t h a t business f i r m s desire t o hold l a r g e r Inventories as a kind o f
war r i s k Insurance and t h a t there w i l l be no l i q u i d a t i o n of inventories
despite the decline i n a c t i v i t y *
On the basis o f data repreeented i n Chart I I I , a decline i n the
production index of about 12 points i s required t o b r i n g accumulation t o
an end, even on the eesumption t h a t consumption w i l l be sustained* This
i s equivalent t o a 17 or 18 point decline i n the Federal Reserve index*
The decline w i l l , o f course, have t o be l a r g e r i f consumption also aovee
downward, A decline e f t h i s magnitude w i l l probably a f f e c t consumption
and other f a c t o r s adversely so t h a t the movement w i l l have to be somewhat
l a r g e r a t best*
Our pessimistic assumption i s based upon the view t h a t a l a r g e
p a r t o f the Inventory accumulation derived from hope f o r , or f e a r o f ,
p r i c e increases* Prices were driven up sharply i n Septeaber by these
very hopes and f c a r e , but the upward movement has since been reversed*
As i s i n d i c a t e d i n the lower section of Chart I I , prices of f o o d s t u f f s
and i n d u s t r i a l raw m a t e r i a l * have been f a l l i n g s t e a d i l y since the middle
o f Deoember and h^ve l o s t about h a l f the previous advance* The downward
t r e n d of new orders Indicates t h a t the busineee community fears t h a t t h i s
trend v i l l continue* The losses t h a t w i l l be incurred w i t h f a r t h e r p r i c e
r e d u c t i o n s , e s p e c i a l l y i f f i n i s h e d - p r o d u c t p r i c e s are a f f e c t e d , create
pressure f o r l i q u i d a t i o n * I n the pest every inventory booalet has been
f o l l o w e d by a period of sharp l i q u i d a t i o n *
I t i s probably t r u e t h a t not a l l the i n v e n t o r i e s accumulated
since the outbreak of war w i l l have t o be l i q u i d a t e d * Our assumption
t h a t 2/3 of t h i s increase w i l l be l i q u i d a t e d say be somewhat p e s s i m i s t i c ,
but I t i s c e r t a i n l y w i t h i n the bounds of reason. This would r e q u i r e a
maximum f a l l of the production index on Chart I I I t o a l e v e l perhaps 6 or
7 p o i n t s under the index o f consumption* This would be equivalent t o a
f u r t h e r decline o f 9 or 10 points i n the Federal Reserve index* This t o t a l
d e c l i n e i s so l a r g e i n magnitude t h a t the other Investment f a c t o r s must be
adversely a f f e c t e d * This w i l l c o n t r i b u t e f u r t h e r t o decline i n a c t i v i t y *
This whole process I s merely the p a t t e r n of the l a s t part of 1939 i n reverse*
jypftrtf

Jfttt » f t f o r e i g n Balanfif

From the outbreak o f war t o the end of November, our export
f i g u r e * gave mo c l e a r i n d i c a t i o n of war s t i m u l a t i o n . The s i g n i f i c a n c e of
the sharp increase i n December and the f a i l u r e of the usual seasonal
d e c l i n e t o appear i n January, however. 1m unmistakable. The export t o t a l
f o r January, w i t h some documents s t i l l missing, i s $350 m i l l i o n * Exports i n

Deceeber were $357 m i l l i o n and i n January 1939 were 1210 m i l l i o n . Some of the


• 3 increase i n the l a s t two months represents goods v&leh would hare moved out
e a r l i e r but f o r the embargo- While a strong stimulus i s evident, t h e r e f o r e ,
I t i s not aa powerful as the f i g u r e s i n d i c a t e *
I f f i g h t i n g becomes i n t e n s i f i e d i n the spring, with perhaps
extension of the war t o other f r o n t s , the volume of exports i n 1940
reach a l e v e l
t o f-2 b i l l i o n i n excess o f the t o t a l of about
billion
i n 1939« This i s the most o p t i m i s t i c forecast that has come to our
attention*
Even i f the war continues on the pre a eh t ecale, w i t h neither side
f e e l i n g t h a t the balance of power i s d e f i n i t e l y i n i t s favor and w i l l i n g t o
r i s k heavy losses i n a l a r g e - s c a l e o f f e n s i v e , the attempts of the b e l l i g e r ents t o strengthen themselves and t u r n the balance i n t h e i r favor may y i e l d
a l e v e l o f exports #1 t o
b i l l i o n higher than 1939* While siore pessimist i c views are held i n some quarters, information concerning commitments by
b e l l i g e r e n t s seams t o j u s t i f y the estimate of #1 b i l l i o n as a minimum i n crease, i f the war continues.
The increase i n a b o r t s w i l l not be r e f l e c t e d f u l l y i n the net
f o r e i g n balance* I n the p a s t , increases i n exports have only increased
the net f o r e i g n balance by i / 4 t o 1/3 of the increase i n exports. Taking
i n t o account the decrease i n export capacity o f the b e l l i g e r e n t s and the
decrease o f t o u r i s t expenditures, however, i t i s reasonable t o assume t h a t
the increase of exports w i l l increase the f o r e i g n balance by something
above £0 percent of the t o t a l increase i n exports. The o p t i m i s t i c e s t i matvw f o r 1940, t h e r e f o r e , assumes that the net f o r e i g n balance * i i i c h was
$780 m i l l i o n i n 1939, w i l l increase to #1,500 m i l l i o n . The pessimistic
estimate assumes an increase t o only | i , 2 5 0 m i l l i o n *
Producers Sftpcnfotiirop f o r Scui F .ent
During the l a s t quarter o f 1939 orders f o r equipment reached a
very high l e v e l * Owing t o the l a g o f production behind orders, t h i s l a r g e
increase w i l l carry over i n t o the f i r s t quarter of 1940, which may reach
a peak about as h i ^ i as the peak reached i n the second quarter of 1937*
From t h i s h i g h l e v e l of output f o r the f i r s t q u a r t e r , however, soiie decline
must occur* I k e decrease i n i n d u s t r i a l a c t i v i t y , by decreasing the p r o p o r t i o n o f presssnt capacity u t i l i z e d , i s discouraging new equipment i n s t a l l a t i o n * Furtheisaore, the s o f t e n i n g of prices i s discouraging any tendency t o
a n t i c i p a t e f u t u r e requirements*
New orders i n t h i s f i e l d have been f a l l i n g o f f very r a p i d l y .
December new orders f o r i r o n and s t e e l were 13 percent below Hovesher and
were 20 percent below December, 193&; f o r e l e c t r i c a l .machinery they nere
21 percent down; and f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n equipment, down 36 percent. Backlogs o f u n f i l l e d orders, which reached a peak i n Nove**ber, are being r a p i d l y reduced despite the current decline i n o p e r a t i o n . The sharp bulge end
d e c l i n e i n new orders since the outbreak o f war i s almost i d e n t i c a l * i t h the
p a t t e r n established i n e a r l y 1937* Only a reversal i n the trend of new
orders, t h e r e f o r e , a spurt such as might occur i f the war reached a considerably l a r g e r scale, would j u s t i f y our o p t i m i s t i c assumption w i t h regard



t o the l e v e l of equipment expenditures.
5

Jore r e a l i s t i c a l l y c o n s i d e r s , the decline should be auoh
l a r g e r . The increase i n exports cannot o f f s e t the decrease i n product i o n f o r i n v e n t o r i e s * With excess capacity increasing and prices f a l l i n g , the decrease i n equipment ex endituree from the f i r s t quarter high
i s l i k e l y t o be as r a p i d as the increase a f t e r the outbreak of war.
This would s t i l l y i e l d a l e v e l f o r 1940 about 4 percent higher than 1939,
and would allow f o r continued high l e v e l i n such l i n e s as a i r p l a n e s ,
s h i p b u i l d i n g , and machinery. The range established by these estimates
i s shown on Chart I ? .

I n the case of p l a n t expenditure* even more d e f i n i t e l y than
i n t h a t of equipment expenditures there i s a l a g behind new orders. The
l e v e l of new orders rose almost constantly through 1939 and expenditures
i n the f i r s t quarter of 1940 s ould be higher than i n the l a s t quarter
of 1939* A c o n t i n u a t i o n of t h i s upward trend would reach & high by tha
l a s t quarter of 1940 approximately as high as the 1937 peak l e v e l s .
On the other hand, a c t i v i t y w i l l d e c l i n e i f the present trend
i n new orders continues. P r i v a t e n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l c o n s t r u c t i o n contract
awards i n January 1940 sere reported to be about equal t o January 1939•
This represents a s u b s t a n t i a l decline from the l e v e l reached i n tha l a s t
q u a r t e r * With business volume f a l l i n g o f f there would be l i t t l e incent i v e f o r a d d i t i o n a l p l a n t expenditures and a d e c l i n e t o the l e v e l of ths
f i r s t quarter of 1939 would not be unreasonable i n the l i g h t of the f o r e going analyses of tha other investment f a c t o r s . The year as a whole would
i n t h i s case again be s l i g h t l y higher than the corresponding t o t a l f o r
1939.
Qovqrpqeftt Pont^u.UyT?
The net government c o n t r i b u t i n w i l l undoubtedly be lower i n
1940 than i t was i n 1939* T&iless there i s a d e f i i t e change i n p o l i c y ,
the f i r s t quarter of 1940 w i l l be perhaps $30 m i l l i o n lower than ths l a s t
quarter of 1939 and the second quarter w i l l be down about |150 m i l l i o n or
approximately 17 percent. A s t i l l f u r t h e r decline i s i n ros; ect f o r
the t h i r d q u a r t e r , even on the assumption t h a t the budget w i l l stand as
o r i g i n a l l y recommended by the President. T h e r e a f t e r , on t h i s same assumpt i o n , the f o u r t h quarter should show a recovery about t o the l e v e l of tha
second q u a r t e r . I f a p : r o p r i a t i o n s are slashed, however, both the t h i r d and
f o u r t h quarters should be somewhat l o w e r . Ho attempt has bean .a&de t o taka
t i s i n t o account i n p r o j e c t i n g estimates i n t o 1940. The currant r a t a o f
expenditures and the budget recommended have been assumed t o ba tha d e t e r mining f a c t o r s *
flftgjflqrfUal totftatttAffl
The trend i n r e s i d e n t i a l c o n s t r u c t i o n has been almost continuousl y upward sines 1934* 1939 was g e n e r a l l y higher than 193S, but by tha and
o f the year tha margin over 193* had been wiped out* This l e v e l l i n g o f f




during 1939 ap >e*re h i g h l y s i g n i f i c a n t i n conjunction w i t h other factor®.
The stlmulue provided by the FHA program of low i n t e r e s t charges and toz*e
favorable amortization was l a r g e l y absorbed i n b r i n g i n g construction t o
t h i s Levelj the market hs« bc«n nearly saturated w i t h res e c t to houses
i n the 15000-410,000 price range, which wag the revs.lent range under t h i s
program* According t o the l a t e s t f i g u r e s , a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r mortgage i n surance have f a l l e n o f f considerably, and on t h i s basis & considerable
decline i n the volume of construction could occur during 1940. The ranges
i n d i e ted on Ch r t XV assums th-.t 1940 may be as tsmch as 10 ercent below
1939 or 10 i>ercent above, the l a t t e r implying merely en extension of the
upward trend of the l a s t few years.
ponsusere Dtyefof G y f l j
With production f a l l i n g as a r e s u l t of the eollapee of the i n ventory boom, prospects f o r 1940 cannot be considered favorable as compared
w i t h the l e v e l re ched i n the l a s t quarter of 1939* Incomes w i l l be impaired a t l e a s t t o the extent of any a d d i t i o n a l unemployment t h a t occurs*
Purchases of consumers* durable goods are u s u a l l y snore s e n s i t i v e than i n comes, > nd move w i t h the l e v e l of a c t i v i t y * I f the decline i n a c t i v i t y
corresponds t o our pessimistic resumption as t o the other investment
f a c t o r s , i t i s l i k e l y t h a t 2/3 of the advance from the 1938 low w i l l be
lost*
Assuming, as i s sometimes argued, t h - t the Ion - t e r m trend i n
consumers1 equipment purchases i s s t i l l upw r d and t h a t a large backlog
e x i s t s , the d e c l i n e from the ye&r-end e&k might be Somewhat less than
the corresponding decline i n a c t i v i t y . At b e s t , however, a decline from
the l a s t quarter should be expected. An o p t i m i s t i c estimate might place
t h i s d e c l i n e e t only h a l f the increase i n the l a s t quarter of 1939, which
would leave the year as a whole 5 percent above 1939*
7,'PW- jnvefftaffirt

iTod-.itflvf

Activity.

The attached t a b l e s show the q u a r t e r l y t o t a l f o r a l l the invest-'
ment f a c t o r s discussed above from 1935 t o 1939 and estimates f o r 1940*
There are three sete of estimates f o r 1940* The f i r a t of these i s based
upon the most o p t i m i s t i c assumptions concerning businees trends, fcs d i e cussed above* The t h i r d ect of estimates i s b^ sed upon the - o a t pessiwilH
t i e estimates concerning trends i n these f a c t o r s * Together these two seta
o f estimates eetablUfli the range w i t h i n wiiich the t o t a l i s l i k e l y t o f a l l .
The second set of estimates i s the mid-point between these two extremes*
As Chart I i n d i c a t e s , production s t best i s l i k e l y t o reach a
l e v e l i n the neighborhood of 105 i n the second and t h i r d quarters and to
approach 100 c l o e e l y f o r a t l e a s t one month. I t may, on the other hand
f a l l t o the neighborhood of 80 i n the t h i r d quarter and i n t h a t case i s
l i k e l y t c get below 90 f o r a t l e a s t one month* A decline of t h i s magnitude would have very serious conseouences and i rob b l v c o u l d be checked
o n l y as the decline of 1937-3*1*® ehee*e*| that i s r by Increased government outlays*



I f the Fara S e c u r i t y Admini3 t r & t i on were authorized t o sake s e l f l i , u i d a t i n g loans up t o ^250,000,000, the money could be used approximately
as f o l l o w s I
A*

^150,000,000 f o r R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Loans.
These l o a n s , averaging about 3500 each end bearing 5 per
cent i n t e r e s t , would be nade t o approxim^tely 300,000
needy f a r a f a m i l i e s , who are unable t o o b t a i n adequate
c r e d i t elsewhere* Loans would be used f o r the purchase
o f seed, f e r t i l i s e r , l i v e s t o c k , t o o l s , and other equipment needed t o enable these people t o make a l i v i n g from
the land* FSA now has on hand uiore than 400,000 a p p l i c a t i o n s f r o a f a m i l i e s e l i g i b l e and i n need o f rehabi i t a t i o n
loans*
Such l o a n s , now aade f r o a r e l i e f funds, are proving about
SO per cent c o l l e c t i b l e ; and losses are l a r g e l y concentrated
i n the Great Plains states which have s u f f e r e d repeated and
severe droughts*
Under the proposed .urogram, only those loans which are
100 per cent recoverable would be made from s e l f - l i u i a a t l n g
funds} w h i l e the poorer r i s k s would be 'candled w i t h emergency r e l i e f funds* I f any loan made f r o a s e l f - l i j u i d s t i n g
funds should become s e r i o u s l y d e l i n q u e n t , i t could bs t r a n s f e r r e d t o the energsncy r e l i e f account* I t i s estimated
t h a t a t l e a s t 75 per cent of a l l r e h a b i l i t a t i o n loans could
be classed as e n t i r e l y s e l f - l i q u i d a t i n g .

B*

$100,000,000 f o r Tenant Purchase Loans
These l o a n s , averaging about $5,000 each, would be aade
t o ap-aroximately 20,000 t e n a n t s , sharecroppers, and f a r a
l a b o r e r s , t o enable thea t o buy farias. FSA now has on
hand 143,000 a p p l i c a t i o n s , although requests f o r loans
have been accepted i n l e s s then h a l f of the n a t i o n ' s a g r i c u l t u r a l c o u n t i e s . Current c o l l e c t i o n s i n d i c a t e t h a t
these loans would be 100 per cent repayable, a t three
per cent I n t e r e s t over a 40-year period*

I t i s estimated t l i a t a t l e a s t a t h i r d of the sonsy advanced f o r r e h a b i l i t a t i o n loans would be spent f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n or durable goods, such
ss f a r a machinery and canning equipment; and t h a t about 25 per cant o f
tha Tenant Purchase loans would be used f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n and r e p a i r o f
b u i l d i n g s , f e n c i n g , t e r r a c i n g , and land improvement.




Appendix

Section 2

pldr-Affc Insurance
I t i s estimated t h a t during the f i s c a l year 1941 the excess of
r e c e i p t s over outpayments from the old-age and survivors t r u s t fund
w i l l amount t o nearly $600,000,000, i n c r e a s i n g the accumulated reserve
from H,750,000,000 a t the beginning of the f i s c a l year t o $2,330,000,000
on June 30, 1941*

Old-age b e n e f i t payments are estimated a t only

1100,000,000 i n f i s c a l 1941 •

the excess of p a y r o l l t a x r e c e i p t s over

b e n e f i t payments Involves a corresponding d r a f t upon incomes and
p a r t i c u l a r l y upon the buying power o f the lower and middle income
groups.

Since the groups c i i i e f l y a f f e c t e d consume c u r r e n t l y a l l or

n e a r l y a l l o f t h e i r income, t h i s d r a f t upon incomes d i r e c t l y produces
a n e a r l y equivalent c o n t r a c t i o n i n the volume of consumer purchasing}
when account i s taken of the i n d i r e c t , cumulative e f f e c t s of the
primary curtailment i n consumer demand, the t o t a l curtailment i n n a t i o n a l
income a t t r i b u t a b l e t o the p i l i n g up of i d l e reserve funds s u b s t a n t i a l l y
exceeds i n amount the current additions t o these funds.
The r e s t r i c t i v e e f f e c t upon national income exerted by our
present old-age insurance system can be relieved through a l i b e r a l i s a t i o n
of the present stringent provisions regarding e l i g i b i l i t y for benefits
of persons reaching age 65, preferably by granting a small pens ion t o
a l l r e t i r e d persons of 65 or over.

Many persons reaching age 65, even

though they have suffered payroll deductions under the old-age pension
system, are i n e l i g i b l e for any benefits whatever under that system,
because t h e i r earnings i n covered employment have been either too low



o r too i n t e r m i t t e n t t o n»et the present e l l p i b l i t y requirements.
A l t e r n a t i v e l y , t h i s d r a i n on consumer buying power would be
reduced through a lowering from 2 per cent t o 1 per cent of the present
t a x on p a y r o l l s , w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n t h a t tha lowered t a x r a t e should
remain i n e f f e c t u n t i l outpayments from the t r u s t fund become equal t o
receipts.

This reduction would reduce consumption taxes by over

1300,000,000 i n f i s c a l 1941.

I t would s t i l l permit a gradual growth

i n the old-age and survivors insurance t r u s t f u n d , which i s already
mora than adequate as a contingency reserve.




—4"

Appendix 3 , Section 3

Unemployment Insurance
Zt i e estimated t h a t the balances of States i n tha unemployment
insurance t r u s t fund, which t o t a l e d $1,510,000,000 on December 31, 1939,
w i l l r i s e from $1,600,000,000 t o $2,380,000,000 during f i s c a l 1941.
The experience of tha State employment insurance system has already
c l e a r l y shown t h a t i n the r e l a t i o n s h i p between taxes and b e n e f i t s t h a
system i s , f o r most s t a t e s , needlessly u n l i b e r a l .

Employers* groups

are u r g i n g l e g i s l a t u r e s t o reduce taxes, and labor organisations, both
A,F, of L , and C . I . 0 , , are advocating- more adequate b e n e f i t s .

It

is

u r g e n t l y desirable t h a t the J o c i a l Security Board should exert a l l
i n f l u e n c e which can a p p r o p r i a t e l y ba brought t o bear t o secure tha
»

araendir^ of State laws regarding unemployment insurance b e n e f i t s .

Since

l e g i s l a t i v e a c t i o n i s r e q u i r e d i n each State separately, r e s u l t s cannot
ba s w i f t l y achieved, but a vigorous s t a r t ought, nevertheless, t o ba
made a t once, f o r both economic and p o l i t i c a l reasons.

Liberalization

of benefits might best take the form o f a lengthening of t h e maximum
period during vrfdch benefits can ba drawn, now 16 weeks i n most States,
Such l i b e r a l i z a t i o n might wall be accompanied by an approach to
nationalising the unemployment compensation system, the present structure
of vtiich involves tha p o s s i b i l i t y of serious inequities between States,
D i f f i c u l t i e s may arise when regional variations i n business conditions
substantially deplete unemployment funds i n a few States while reserves
continue to accumulate i n others, unless benefits are held down i n those
States where employment fluctuates most widely.




-5-

Appendix 3 f Section 4
Extension of PPSWH*A* type of

racing

I n an e f f o r t t o o b t a i n the stimulating, e f f e c t s of s u b s t a n t i a l
non-Federal p u b l i c works expenditures and a t the same time avoid the
heavy charge on the Federal budget t h a t l a i n v o l v e d under the P*W«A«
system o f 45 per cent cash g r a n t s , i t i s proposed t h a t s p e c i a l inducement t o l o c a l governments t o continue p u b l i c c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t s
be f u r n i s h e d by g i v i n g a subsidy i n th© form o f Federal annual c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o s e r v i c i n g the debts i n c u r r e d by m u n i c i p a l i t i e s i n the
f i n a n c i n g of cueh p r o j e c t s .

The Federal Government 1 s c o n t r i b u t i o n t o

m u n i c i p a l i t i e s mi f e ht be ^ i v e n i n an annual amount e u a l t o 50 per c*mt
of the annual debt s e r v i c e on m u n i c i p a l borrowings i n c u r r e d t o f i n a n c e
the c o s t o f the p r o j e c t s .

These annual Federal payments would be

made both on loans made t o the m u n i c i p a l i t i e i by the P u b l i c Sorks
A u t h o r i t y of the United States and on loans obtained elsewhere, p r o vided t h a t the r t t e of i n t e r e s t on th© l a t t e r loans would n o t exceed
3 per c e n t .

The i n t e r e s t r a t e charged by the U. 3 . Public Works

A u t h o r i t y would a l s o be 3 par c e n t .

The P u b l i c Works A u t h o r i t y would

be a u t h o r i s e d t o o b t a i n c a p i t a l funds f o r the making of such loans
through the s a l s of i t s own o b l i g a t i o n s , c a r r y i n g a Government guarantee.
The main reason f o r annual c o n t r i b u t i o n s i s t h a t t h i s method spreads
the c o s t over the l i f e o f t h s p r o j s e t i n s t e a d o f t r e a t i n g the whole
c a p i t a l o u t l a y as a charge against the c u r r e n t y e a r ' s budget*




Aopendfo A

II.

Long-time f i s c a l program.

P a r a l l e l i n g t h i s program of immediate a c t i o n shouiu be a longer
time program of continuing p o l i c y , t o be followed i n succeeding Congresses.
The country i s alarmed about the s t e a d i l y r i s i n f e debt, and wants
an approech towards a balanced budget. This can be accomp ished safely
by a iong-time program which .includes t
1 . Tax reorganisation t o produce mor© taxes, w i t h less pressure
on consumption and more encouragement f o r investment. The t a x
program of the Federal Government should be modified as r a p i d l y
as possible t o diminish taxes now pressing on consumption and t o
Increase taxes on incomes no* going i n t o i d l e hoards. This s h i f t
i n the tax program should make i t jo&sible to oecre&se the net
c o n t r i b u t i o n and approach a balanced budget w i t h s a f e t y .
(a) Close the loopholes i n the present income tax laws.
(b) Tax r a t s s on the .dddle-incume brackets should be
increased.
(c) Impose a tax on war p r o f i t s as soon as the recovery
begins t o take h o l d ; under present conditions large excess
p r o f i t s i n the l i m i t e d f i e l d s r e c e i v i n g war orders merely
go i n t o i d l e surpluses and snake no f u r t h e r c o n t r i b u t i o n t o
recovery.
(d) Taxes which bear on consumption should be diminished
as a d d i t i o n a l revenue from the above taxes begins t o accrue.
(e) Cease the issuance of tax-exempt s e c u r i t i e s .
2 . Expand the r nge of continuing f e d e r a l grants t o provide
annual grants t o states i n a i d of s o c i a l programs.
(a) At f i r s t , these mi^ht cover grants f o r ne< f i e l d s
f o r which well-m tured programs and aide-spread support
have already been developed, i n c l u d i n g education, p u b l i c
h e a l t h , and c h i l d w e l f a r e .
(b) Subsequently other areas of expanded s o c i a l service
a i a h t be developed, such as broad r e c r e a t i o n a l and j u v e n i l e
welfare programs.
3 . As n a t i o n a l income r i s e s pest 80 b i l l i o n s , Slid f e d e r a l
revenues r i s e and r e l i e f needs d e c l i n e , make a s t a r t i n paying o f f
past debts, but be c a r e f u l not t o c o n t a c t f e d e r a l expenditures
t o the p o i n t where businees a c t i v i t y i s cnecked and income might
again f a l l .



-

2 -

No program of f i s c a l p o l i c y alone can provide a s o l u t i o n t o
a l l our i l l $ . F i s c a l p o l i c y iti the most e f f e c t i v e recovery weapon
t h a t the New Deal has yet devised. I t cannot, however, rovids an
answer t o the problems of concentration of f i n a n c i a l power and t o
the p r i c e and production p o l i c i e s of monopolistic corporations,
srith which the T.N.E.G. has been g r a p p l i n g . An e f f e c t i v e f i s c a l
p o l i c y , aggressively and broadly f o l l o w e d , can hold th© f o r t while
we work out s o l u t i o n s t o these l a r g e r problems. F i s c a l operations
alone could r a i s e our n a t i o n a l Income t o 80 t o 90 b i l l i o n s a yenr,
and hold i t there f o r a ten or f i f t e e n year breathing s p e l l , i n
which we might l e a r n how t o deal w i t h the l a r g e r i n d u s t r i a l problem.
III.

Long-time educational e f f o r t necessary.

Current surveys of opinion i n d i c a t e t h a t ape? ding i s not nearly
so unpopular ason^ the general p u b l i c , an tihe ne -spacers hove led
Centress t o b e l i o v e . Both on farms and i n c i t i e s , a l a r g e m a j o r i t y of
the p u b l i c approves spending f o r p a r t i c u l a r purposes, and only a m i n o r i t y
oppose even spending i n general. (Note Appendix 2 . ) Yet i t s t i l l
remains t r u e t h a t most persons would probably answer RYesp t o the quest i o n , "Should we balance the budget?"
An educational program should l a y major emphasis where the r e sistance i s least—on the human value of r e l i e f , C.C.C., N.Y.A. and
farm programs, on the general welfare i n s o i l and n a t u r a l resource
conservation, and on the s o c i a l value of p u b l i c works and services.
At the seae t i m e , continuing education on the general problem i s needed.
As the program o u t l i n e d above goes i n t o e f f e c t and we move
toward f u l l recovery, popular support can be expected t o expand, r e gardless of any propaganda measures t h a t the opposition may r e s o r t t o .
I n the shorter term, however, i t i s important t h a t the p u b l i c be educated
on the nature of Government debt and sold on the immediate necessity f o r
f u r t h e r d e f i c i t s . The temporary nature of the d e f i c i t s under the new
program can be emphasized. Amon^ the p o i n t s t o be used i n s e l l i n g the
program may be l i s t e d the f o l l o w i n g !
1 . The cost of stopping d e f l a t i o n i s n e g l i g i b l e i n contrast
w i t h the cost of d e f l a t i o n . The country i s obviously b e t t e r o f f «>hen
i t s c i t i z e n s are employed i n producing u s e f u l goods than rhen they are
i d l e and i n want.
2 . The program i s designed t o f u r t h e r the expansion of
markets. The b e n e f i t s of Government expenditures are f e l t , t h e r e f o r e ,
by every stratum of toe community. Every d o l l a r of Government
expenditures represent a t l e a s t s d o l l a r o f r e c e i p t s by some business




- 3 -

f i r m j i t i s o r d i n a r i l y m u l t i p l i e d several time:*. On the average,
each d o l l a r added t o Government ex penditure h&» increased n a t i o n a l
income by three t o f i v e d o l l a r s ,
3» The budget comes i n t o balance as the n a t i o n a l income i n creases, I t cen be ksnt i n balance only ii" the economy can be
kept i n balance. This i s assured by the program o u t l i n e d .
Debt represents only one side o f the ledger and the assets
on the other ide also ought t o be taken i n t o account. O f f s e t t i n g
t h s increase i n debt t r e tremendously valuable aasets, such as
schools, roads, and u t i l i t i e s . Many people kno>v l i t t l e or nothing
about sisaly recent public improvements, euch p& sewer p r o j e c t s .
Publicise these a>5f?ets and t h e i r values t o s p e c i f i c section? of the
country and s p e c i f i c communities,
5, Kmnhasiae t h a t there i s no danger of bankrupts, the
Federal Government, The present debt could be increased tremendously i t h o u t endangering the Government1a c r e d i t . On the
other h?nd, i n s i s t t h a t the Government w i l l not have t o r e s o r t t o
t h i s c r e d i t un er the new program and t h a t i t s c r e d i t w i l l
t h e r e f o r e remain good i n c l e i ' l n i t e l y ,
6 , I^&ph&size t h a t r i s i n g debt does not mean i n f l a t i o n , A
d o l l a r today w i l l buy mu h more than a d o l l a r would i n 1929 • So
long as many men are without Jobs, heavy expenditures mean more
goods and more employment, and not higher p r i c e s ,
7 , Our n a t i o n a l debt i s very low compared ^ i t h France's and
England's and taxes also are low compred w i t h those c o u n t r i e s .




CHART

/.

I N D U S T R I A L PRODUCTION A N D TOTAL
I N V E S T M E N T , QUARTERLY, 1935-1940
( A d j u s t e d

f o r

Seaso/to/Yoaafron)

/A/VESTMENT
M/LL/ONS

Of

PER
7,0

PROOUCT/ON

DOLLARS

QUARTER
0

/ 9 23 ~/925-J

0

O O
/

5 0

/40
•m
••
•
•• /mf '
m
•f
•m
m
••M
mf /

6 , 0 0 0

PRC >DUCT/a
•/ —
/

• M

5,0 OO

/

M

••
•••
•

4tOOO

• X
*"* /

/s

\
//vyest,

M
M
M
M

••
•
•

• ••
1
11 ••
11 ••
11 ••
I1••
11 ••
11 ••
11 ••
1•

^

3o

/

ZO

I / O

mm

/ O O

•mm
m

\
WENT

•y

/

/

90

\

8 0

3,0 0 0

TO

6 o

2,0 0 0

SO
40
3 O

JtOOO




2O
O

1935

936

1937

1938

939

1940
D D.40

-5I

i n v e n t o r y V a l u e s and T r e n d * ,

1935-39

(Dun & B r a d s t r e e t s

and U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f

Commerce).

N o t e . - - V a l u e o f i n v e n t o r i e s (Dun k B r a d s t r e e t s s e r i e s ) , f o r J a n u a r y 1 , 1940 was e s t i m a t e d b y t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f
Commerce upon t h e b a s i s o f changes i n sample d a t a d u r i n g t h e l a s t h a l f o f 1 9 3 9 .
The m o n t h l y i n d e x o f t o t a l
i n v e n t o r i e s i n t e r m s o f J a n u a r y 1 , 1936 d o l l a r s i s based upon t h e Dun t B r a d s t r e e t s s e r i e s ; a d j u s t m e n t s f o r
w h o l e s a l e p r i c e t r e r d s , and I n t e r p o l a t i o n s f o r m o n t h l y f i g u r e s h a r e been made by t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f Commerce.
T h i s i n d e x a l s o has b e e n a d l u s t e d f o r s e a s o n a l v a r i a t i o n s .

VALUE OF INVENTORIES, UNADJUSTED
JANUARY I, 1936 = 100
|
!
140
MANUFACTUR/NG^f;-.

130

I

i

!
TOTAL-

i

120

//
/

/jr

110

J?

aV

WHOLESAL/NG

PHYSICAL VOLUME OF INVENTORIES, SEASONALLY ADJUSTED
JANUARY I, 1936 = 100
140

A
/
•• ... / <//
\ \ „

SRETA/L/NG
100

90

JAN I,

1935

JAN I,

JAN I,

'36

'37

Indexes o f Spot Market




JAN I, U
l LY I JAN I, JULY I, JAN I,
'38 '38 '39 '39 '40 1935
Daily Frices

1936

1937

1938

o f 1£ F o o d s t u f f s and 16 Raw I n d u s t r i a l C o r j r . o d i t i e s , A u g u s t 3 1 , 1S39 r u a r y 7 , 1940 ( u . S . ^ S u a r t n e - i t o f L a b o r )

1939

Feb-

CHART /.
INDEXES OF PHYSICAL V O L U M E OF
PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, AND I N V E N T O R I E S
CONSUMER GOODS
(ADJUSTED

OF

FOR SEASONAL V A R I A T I O N )

PERCENT OF AVERAGE 1929 C O N S U M P T I O N

120

•

•
••

•I
••

Prod uciioni

00

•4 >
•

:

• •
• •

Tm
V

•

•
•

•

•• • •
•

y

^

•

T

% T
* V

•

^Consumpf

•

ion
t

' v v / r

m

^
•• /

'

••

•••

80

6 o

—--

Inventories
4 0

—

*• ™ ^

20

aa. 40-so
19 3 5




1936

1937

1938

1939

194-0

CHART /.

(Adjusted for Seasonal Variation)

Consulners Durabi ks
•
•

•

•

•

•

•

•
•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

••
•
«

%
•

••

••

•
•
•

•

»•
•

•

•

••

•

w

*.

•

••
•

•.
•

.•

•

\

Equip m en1~

P/a n f y — '

...

...

•

\i«

•
•
•
•
•
•




INVESTMENT FACTORS

1935

1936

1937

1936

1939

1940

CHART

/.

INVESTMENT FACTORS
(Adjusted for Seasonal Variation)
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER QUARTER

IIOO
1600

r <

s

o

WRNMENt

r

NET

/

c m<m/Burm

1200

1000

/
•/

•00

\

•• : •
•
•

••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

s%
•• 1
§

400

*
••
•
••

WES

/NYENTa

/•
•v ,
•
•I
••
•
••

t

#

v..,--

•

*»*

•
••
••
•

•»•

-v

x

V

V

/

/
••

*

:

/iO/fE/6/V

»
••
••

f

•

\

a

^
\•
•

-200

*

"l

AALANCE

•

••
••

••
••

\& •:

r
i-

• •
••
•

~ W "

-400

-600

\

•

I

:

v

-800

-1000

1935

1936

1937

1938

1939

1940
DD-40-4*

3/74