View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

February 2, 1950.

Honorable Charles 1. Tobey,
United States Senate,
Washington, D. C.
Dear Senator Tobey:
I am enclosing herewith the memorandum
about which I talked to you this afternoon relative
to a bill to amend the Federal Deposit insurance
Corporation Act. The memorandum not only reflects
my views but is in harmony with the views of all the
other members of the Board. I hope you will have an
opportunity to read the statement and that if you
concur in the suggestions you will give them your
vigorous support as only you can.
I expect to get copies of this statement
in the hands of Senators Fulbright and Douglas.
"ftith warm personal regards,

Sincerely yours,

(Signed) M. S. Eccles
k. S. Iccles.

Enclosure

n




February 2, 1950.

Dear Senator *ulbright:
I am enclosing herewith the memorandum
about which I talked to you this afternoon relative
to a bill to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation /tct. The memorandum not only reflects
ay views but is in harmony with the views of all the
other members of the board, i hope you will have M
opportunity to read the statement.
when this matter comes before the full
Committee, 1 hope you »ill be able to be present and
mill be willing to support the position of the Board,
at least v»ith reference to the question of ^Examinations
of State Member -"anks" and "Loans to Prevent the Closing
of Banks". 1 realize you may find it difficult at this
stege to get any change in the proposal with reference
to "Dividends to Insured
frith warm personal regards,
Sincerely yours,

(Signed) ii. S.
M. 5. Eccles.

Hon. J. "illiara *ulbright,
United States Senate,
Washington, D. C.

0

rebruc-ry k, 1950

De&r Senator
I am enclosing herewith the memorandum about
which I talked to you this afternoon relative to ft bill
to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act,
The memorandum not only reflects my views but is in haraony
with the views of ail the other members of the Board. 1
hope you will have an opportunity to read the statement.
I am glad to know that you concur in the views
of the Board in regard to the question of ^Examinations of
Stats Member Banks11 c«nd wLoans to Prev nt the Closing of
Banks". I understand your position, as expressed over the
telephone, relative to the other item in the memorandum,
i.e., "Dividends to Insured Banks", and respect your views.
I have sent copies of this memorandum to Senators Tobey and *ulbright.

0




with warm personal regards,
Sincerely yours,

(signed) ii« S.
U. S. £ccles.

Hon. Paul Douglas,
United States Senate,
Washington, D. C.

PROPOSALS hSGiihDING S. 2822, A BILL "TO MEND
THE FFDKKAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT"

Examinations of State Member Banks. - Present law permits the
FDIC to examine State bailees that are members of the Federal Reserve
System only with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System. Section 10(b) of the bill would give the FDIC th© power
to examine such banks without the Board's consent. It would, however,
continue the existing requirement that the Corporation obtain the consent
of the Comptroller of th© Currency in order to examine a national bank.
This change is unnecessary} it would increase overlapping and
duplication in the examination and supervision of banks; and, by acting
as a deterrent to State bank membership in the Federal Reserve System,
it would weaken the effectiveness of Federal credit and monetary policies.
The existing law has worked well. The Board's recoras show
that 115 requests for consent to examine State member banks have been
received from the FDIC. Of these none has been refused, 110 were granted,
and in 5 cases the requests were witndrawn or dropped. The objective of
Federal Reserve examinations, which is substantially the same as that of
other Federal examining authorities, is primarily to determine the
financial condition and soundness of a bank and the integrity and ability
of its management.
Section 10(b) of the bill, therefore, should be amended so as
to continue the existing law requiring the consent of the Board for
examination of State member banks by the FDIC.
If it should nevertheless be determined that some cnange is
to be mad© in existing law on this point, the maximum change should be
one which would require (a) the Federal Reserve Board to report to the
FDIC all State member banks considered to be problem banks, (b)'to furnish to the Corporation all information available with respect to banks
so reported, and (c) to grant permission to examine any bank so reported
if the Corporation should then request it.
Loans to Prevent the Closing of Banks. - Section 13(b) of the
bill would authorize the Corporation to maKe loans to, or purchase the
assets of, an insured bank, in order to prevent its closing. It is
desirable that the Corporation have powers of this kind to deal with
distress cases. However, the language of the bill is not altogether
clear and might be interpreted as permitting the Corporation to lend to
banks generally. To make clear that this interpretation is not intended,
this authority should be confined to cases where the Corporation has
determined that an insured banK is in grave danger of closing.




Dividends to Insured Banks* - In addition to the two amendments mentioned above, which are essential, it would improve the bill
to make certain changes also regarding dividends to insured banks.
The bill provides for dividends to insured banks equal to
60 per cent of the net assessment income of the Corporation. Such net
assessment income, however, does not include income from investments.
Investment income is ft substantial portion of the entire income of the
Corporation and it snould be included as a basis for the determination
of dividends.
Moreover, in computing net assessment income, reserves for
insurance losses are deducted along with operating costs and expenses.
Reserves, of course, should be deducted In computing net income but
the authority of the Corporation to set up reserves should be more
carefully defined. It is suggested that the setting up of reserves
be authorized only upon the basis of an analysis of estimated losses.
The present size of the insurance fund, about $1,200,000,000,
together with its authority to borrow from the Treasury, justifies a
higher dividend rate than the 60 per cent provided in the bill, it is
suggested that this rate might be as high as 75 p©r cent of net income
derived from both assessments and investments.

February 2, 1950