View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

TREASURY DEPARTM ENT
O F F IC E O F
C O M PTR O LLER O F TH E C U R REN C Y
NATIONAL BANK EXAMINER

Post Office Box 1584
•faco, Texas
April 2, 1944
Ur. Marriner Eccles* Chaiman
The Board of Governors
The Federal Reserve System
V/ashington, D. C.
Dear Mr. Eccless
Your address in the March, issue of the Federal Reserve Bulletin
on the subject of Possibilities of Post-?iar Inflation and Suggested
Tax Action is a classic.
It is so regrettable that the major portion of the American
business men and bankers and those who make our laws do not really
understand the seriousness of the present growth of inflationary
tendencies.
Many billions of. dollars of losses by inflation, which are
certain under our present "sins-of-omission” policy, can yet be
prevented if we act in time.
The American people should not be permitted to save (after
taxes) #100 billion (or more) in three years (§27 billion in 1942,
$36 billion in 1943, and $37 billion, or more, in 1944) while our
sons and brothers and spilling their hot blood in all parts of the
world.
Why should the people add $100 billion (in three years) to the
§400 billion or $500 billion savings, all their savings for one
hundred sixty-eight years?
vf who are engaged in our daily duties~and feel that we
ie
understand where wen» are headed— do not have an opportunity
to contribute much toward a sounder course. If we lose our past
savings by inflation, with them we will also lose the financial
backing of so many of our American institutions.




Proper tax action is our greatest weapon against inflation.

(This is written aa an individual and not as a National B&nk
Examiner. Please do not quote me by name.)




April 11, 1944.

Mr. J. v . Hawkins,
«
P. 0. Box 1584,
maco, Texas.
Dear Mr. Hawkins:
This is to acknowledge your letter of
April 2 in regard to my discussion of postwar
fiscal policy as an instrument in helping to at­
tain economic stability. I wanted you to know
that I appreciated your taking the trouble to
write me your always thoughtful and penetrating
comments. I am particularly impressed with your
recognition of the importance of proper tax
policy.
You may be sure that 1 shall regard
your letter as entirely personal and not for quota­
tion by name.
imith kindest personal regards,
Sincerely yours,

M. £ . Eccles,
>
Chairman.

ET:b