View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.



February 13, 1946

Honorable Fred M, Vinson,
Secretary of the Treasury,
Washington 25, I). C.
Dear Fred:
In view of the responsibilities placed upon the Sation&l
Advisory Council for giving guidance to tJie representatives of the
United States on the international Fwid and Bunk, i t1 has occurred to
si© that I t would be useful to have a special meeting of the Council
in the near future to consider the questions which may arise at the
coming meeting of the Board of Governors for these institutions*
I dare say that ths Governors' meeting will consider a broad
range of problems connected with the acteinistration of ths Bretton
food« Institutions, not a l l of which csn now 1be forseen. However, the
Council might devote soma time tc eortsidering !!• S* policy in matter®
such as the following:
(l) Location of Fund and Bank. I understand the field
i s e t i l l pretty udde open as between W&shin^ton and Nero York,
nith the foreign countries expected to support Uev Xork. I
think that on the U. S« side we mist weigh very c&refully the
advantages of having the Fund and Bank in our financial center
against the advantages of having them in the center «here 0. S.
policy i s formed and rchert the f« S, repreaent&tires could be
in intimate contact with Government Agende* and with the
tional dvieory Council.
(2) lh<5ther Fvxecutive Directors and their full-tlae officers, I understand that there i s con—
slderable difference of opinion on this |uestion between our
people and the foreign expert* who have spoken on the subject*
Hi should consider the extent to which w want to press our
(3) Policy on adglcalon of new aenber*. 1 number of important issue© are involved here, in rmrticul&r the question



Honorable Fred K. fin son
of how far we should go In keeping th@ door open to Russia,
Australia, and Hew Zealand, which did not meet the December
31 deadline.
In addition to the®® subjects, there are two further onee which
i t see&a to me the National MfiattlJ Council should consider, but •'which
are of such a nature that they should probably be treated in an Sxeentive
Session of the Council. These
(1) Consideration of candld&tas for the Um&gixiM Director
of the Fund and the President of the Dank. I t i s o%vious that
a great deal of the success of th«se Institutions will depend
upon the persons chosen as their chisf executive officers. I
appreciate that these officers will not be elected at th© Board
of Governors' meeting, but I should be wurprl—J if the mibject
did not come up for discuseion there at least on & informal
(2) Salaries of the principal Fund snd S&nk o f f i c i a l s
I do not loMM nhat the thinkinf has been on this subject thu*
far. I t i s clear, however, th&t these salaries should receive
serious consideration, not only from the point of view of a t tracting men of the necessary caliber but, al»o with a vi&ir to
establishing an appropriate relationship between the earn* paid
to Executive Directors on the one hand and to the V&n&ging Director of the Fund <§nd President of the Bask on the other*
Sincerely yours,

M. 5. Kccles,