View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

March 21, 1945
(Statement by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System)

The Board of Governors
that ratification of the Bretton
step in the restoration of world
the United States in the postwar

of the Federal Reserve System is convinced
Woods Agreements would be an important
trade and in safeguarding the interests of

Without the institutions proposed by these Agreements we would be
confronted with disrupted currency conditions and with trade and exchange
policies and practices which foreign countries might be forced to adopt in
self-preservation but which would nevertheless have disorganizing effects
on world trade. In rebuilding the machinery of international finance after
the war it will be vital to avoid the recurrence of practices which developed after the first World War, and to eliminate abuses which were prevalent in international lending. Effective action in these fields would form
a counterpart to essential programs of domestic reconstruction. The
greatest contribution to international prosperity and stability that the
United States can make is to maintain full employment and a rising standard
of living at home. In order to establish international trade on a sound
and enduring foundation, it must be based upon a balanced exchange of goods
and services. On such a basis it will contribute an important steadying
influence to our domestic economy.
The International Monetary and Financial Conference of representatives of forty-four nations held last summer in Bretton Woods resulted in
agreements for the creation of two new international financial institutions,
the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The International Monetary Fund would exert an influence toward exchange stability and thus reduce the exchange risks for
exporters and importers. It would require member countries to maintain
established exchange rates and would provide machinery for making in an
orderly manner by mutual agreement such changes in exchange rates as may be
necessary. Members undertake to eliminate as soon as possible monetary
practices which interfered with the flow of world trade before the war,
such as discriminatory exchange restrictions, multiple currency arrangements,
and bilateral clearing agreements. It would help to give assurance to member countries that the proceeds of sales to any country could be used for
the purchase of goods in any other country.
For the purpose of assisting member countries in maintaining their
exchange rates, once they have been established, without resorting to harmful restrictions on trade, the Fund would have resources in gold and various


currencies which would be available for temporary use by members. It
would afford member countries faced with heavy payments abroad a breathing
spell during which to make necessary adjustments in their economies with a
view to restoring equilibrium in their trade with the world. The Fund
would not be in essence a lending institution but a mechanism for converting local currencies contributed by members into a pool of international
reserves, on which each country could draw in proportion to its contribution. While temporary shortages of foreign exchange could be met through
use of the Fund, members would be under pressure to restore the exchange
to the Fund as soon as possible in order to maintain its ability to serve
other members.
As a companion institution to the Fund, the Bank for Reconstruction and Development would be a lending institution to promote the international flow of long-term capital. It would make loans for productive
and developmental purposes out of its own capital or out of funds borrowed
in the market and would guarantee such loans offered to private investors.
It is intended to make or guarantee such loans as would in the long run
increase the borrower's ability to balance its international accounts. It
would help to restore economies destroyed or disrupted by war, to reconvert
their productive facilities to peacetime needs, and to develop the resources
of less developed countries.
The Bank would have a stabilizing influence on interest rates and
other conditions for international loans and would tend to eliminate practices in international investment that have in the past resulted in excessive costs to borrowers and in losses to lenders. It would handle only
loans that could not be obtained on reasonable terms without its support
and would, therefore, in no way interfere with the flow of private funds
into international investments. At the same time it would make it possible
for countries greatly in need of foreign resources to obtain necessary
capital which might not otherwise be available to them on reasonable terms.
The agreement provides that loans made or guaranteed by the Bank must have
the approval of the lending country. Consequently, the loans can and should
be so timed as to diminish either inflationary or deflationary pressures,
and to contribute to the maintenance of economic stability in this country.

From the point of view of the Board of Governors the establishment of the Fund and the Bank would be desirable because they would contribute to world recovery and to the maintenance of economic stability at
a high level which is the main objective of the Board's policy. The monetary and credit structure of this country is continually and seriously
affected by international transactions. In the past this country's monetary authorities have had to meet difficult situations when our banking
system was called upon to absorb an excessive amount of foreign funds


arising out of surplus commodity exports and capital movements from foreign
countries. The adoption of the proposed Agreements should help to moderate
these disturbing influences.

In connection with the enabling legislation now before Congress,
the Board is strongly in favor of the addition of a provision for the
establishment of a council or committee to provide the necessary direction
and guidance to the representatives of the United States on the governing
bodies of the Fund and the Bank and to interpret to them the international
financial and monetary policies of the United States. Members of this
council or committee should consist of the heads of the appropriate agencies
of the Government to be designated by the President. It should be a small
group, comprising not more than five members. Since the proposed institutions are to be permanent, it would be advisable to have the council provided by'law rather than by executive order or informal arrangement. The
council would not only advise the American governors and directors on the
Fund and the Bank of its views with respect to the financial and monetary
policies of the United States but would also be authorized to act for the
United States in matters which require approval under the agreements,
except in cases in which the right to decide will be retained by Congress.
Establishment of such a council would assure reasonable continuity in the
interpretation of American international financial policy to this country's
representatives on the Bank and the Fund. Provision for such a council in
the enabling legislation would not call for any change or modification of
the Articles of Agreement of the Fund or Bank.