The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-£O 1947 industry in the United States. Controls cattle. We have the disease now in should be used for such maintenance of Mexico, and we all know that public a synthetic rubber industry only if spe- carriers are daily coming from Mexico cific authority is provided for that pur- into the United States without proper pose. regulation as to garbage that might be I therefore recommend that.the Sen- dumped in the United States and bring ate and the House .of Representatives, by about this infection and disease. This joint resolution, make a declaration of bill will protect the American horticulpolicy to the effect that it is the firm in- ture, agriculture, and livestock industry. tention of the Government to maintain I would like to see the House adopt this a synthetic rubber industry in the United bill, because I think it is urgently needed, States, adequate to the minimum needs particularly at this time. Mexico, our neighboring country, has perhaps as of national security. I further recommend that the Senate much as half a million head of livestock and the House of Representatives act ex- affected by the hoof-and-mouth disease. peditiously in establishing appropriate Mr. HOPE}. While I made a reservacommittee arrangements to consider the tion of objection, I have no intention, of problems involved in maintaining a syn- course, of objecting to the bill. It is thetic rubber industry in the United true, as the gentleman has stated, that States and to draft such legislation as is the bill passed the House unanimously, found to be necessary to accomplish this as I recall it, in the last session, and it objective. lacked passage only because of a clerical I repeat my recent recommendation ^error which resulted in the considerathat the authority to continue allocation tion of the bill being postponed in the controls on rubber be continued for 1 Senate. The Committee on Agriculture year under title i n of the Second War the other day reported the bill unaniPowers Act, in order that the Congress mously. I know of no objection to it. may have an opportunity to consider Mr. ELLIOTT. It is important to this problem and to enact such perma- bring it up at this time because of the nent legislation as in its judgment is prevalence of the hoof-and-mouth disnecessary and appropriate. . ease in Mexico, and I hope there will be The program of action I have out- no objection to the passage of the measlined has the unanimous and vigorous ure at this time. support of all agencies of Government The SPEAKER. Is there objection to concerned with this problem. I am in- the requesj of the gentleman frop*-*^structing these agencies to give all pos- fornia? sible assistance to the Congress in its conThere being no objection, the clerk sideration of the problem, and to make read the bill, as follows: available, on request, the statistical Be it enacted, etc., That (a) for the purmaterial and other information which poses of this act— they have collected. (1) The term "garbage" means waste maHARRY S. TRUMAN. THE WHITE HOUSE, February 7,1947. PROTECTING AMERICAN AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, LIVESTOCK, AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH Mr. ELLIOTT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent for the immediate 'consideration of the bill H. R. 597. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California? Mr. HOPE. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, will the gentleman explain the bill? Mr. ELLIOTT. Mr. Speaker, this bill will provide legislation which makes mandatory the proper handling of garbage from transportation facilities, such as ships, railway cars, airplanes, and other forms of transportation by which garbage might be carried. Last year I introduced a similar bill, which passed the House but on account of a typographical error found on the last day of the session in the Senate the bill was held up. I relntroduced this bill in January of this year. We now have in Mexico the hoof-andmouth disease, and this bill will go a long way to protect what I believe might be one of the main germ carriers, transportation. Back in 1924 and 1925 we had the hoof-and-mouth disease In the United States. At that time it was brought in by ships from foreign countries. Garbage was dumped in the waters on the west http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ coast near San Francisco, and we lost thousands of head of Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis terial, such as food scraps, table refuse, galley refuse, and refuse from stores of ships, railway cars, and aircraft, including such waste material In passengers' and crews' quarters, derived, In whole or In part, from fruits, vegetables, or animal products which have originated outside of, and have not previously legally entered, the continental United States. (2) The term "fruits, vegetables, or ^nimni products" shall not include fruits, vegetables, or animal products, purchased as ships' provisions in Canadian ports on the Great Lakes, unless there Is in effect, with respect thereto, a proclamation Issued under subsection (b) of this section. (3) The term "vessel" means every description of craft or other contrivance used, or capable oT being used, as means of transportation on or in water. (4) The term "aircraft" means every description of craft or other contrivance used, or capable of being used, as means of transportation through the air. (5) The term "person" means an Individual, partnership, corporation, company, society, or association, a State or any agency thereof, or a political subdivision of a State or any agency thereof; and such term Imports the singular or plural, as the case may be. (6) The term "United States," when not limited by the adjective "continental," Includes all Territories and possessions of the United States, with the exception?*^ the Philippine Islands and the Canal Zoi (7) The term "continental United btates" means that part of the United States located on the continent of North America, including Alaska, but excluding Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the Canal Zone. (8) The term "territorial waters of the United States" means all navigable waters of the United States, including all portions of the sea within Its jurisdiction. TOP^SSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE FEBRUARY 10 The press officer at the Justice Department, on the other hand, seems to function more or less as a censor or security officer. I am told by newspapermen that they must channel their inquiries at the Justice Department through the With the following committee amend- public information director. He in turn ment: releases only such information as he or Page 8, line 21, after the word "March" his superiors may choose. I am sure strike out "13" and insert "3." Congress does not regard that type of The committee amendment was agreed public information as desirable. The State Department is now operto. ating a foreign The bill was ordered to be engrossed through vast Office of publicity program its International Inand read a third time, was read the formation and Cultural Affairs. That third time, and passed, and a motion to office now has more than 3,000 employees. reconsider was laid on the table. I am told that in many cases the De^ SPECIAL ORDER partment has taken on young men just The SPEAKER. Under previous or- out of military service with little or no der of the House the gentleman from experience in public relations and little Connecticut [Mr. MILLER] is recognized or no actual first-hand knowledge of for 20 minutes. American social and economic institu(Mr. MILLER of Connecticut asked tions. Yet these young men are being and was given permission to revise and hired at salaries ranging from $6,000 to extend his remarks.) j $7,000 and are being sent all over the world to serve as publicity agents for the PROPAGANDA United States Government. I am told Mr. MILLER of Connecticut. Mr. I that these agents are being appointed by Speaker, during the campaign last No- I the State Department without any exvember I repeatedly urged the residents amination whatsoever, and are being asof my district to vote on the basis of sured that after some service abroad they facts rather than rumors or propaganda: will be given a permanent State DepartI believe I made that suggestion in every ment status without qualifying by examcampaign speech. I further promised inations. if elected to Congress I would try I have here an example of how this ^ep my district informed as to the organization spends the taxpayers' hardav ities of their Government. It was with this in view that I intro- earned dollars. Look magazine recently duced a few days ago a resolution au- published reprints of seven paintings thorizing a special committee to investi- purchased by the Government, we are gate Government public relations and told at a cost of $40,000. These paintings are to be sent around the world as propaganda activities. So far as I can learn Congress has an exhibition of American art and culnever in contemporary times obtained an ture. If these paintings represent Amerintegrated over-all picture of what we ican art at its best, let us bury them in a are spending on publicity agents and just deep hole instead of displaying them to what those agents do. Various appro- our neighbors. priations subcommittees get some of The Federal Reserve Board presents I these facts piecemeal as they consider another example of what I regard as a the respective supply bills. But no com- bad practice. It has long been the habit mittee so. far as I can ascertain has ever of many Federal agencies to hire pubcompiled this information in such form licity agents in the guise of other capacithat a House Member can learn for him- ties. Thus their budget allocations are self the costs and functions of Govern- not identified as being for the purpose ment publicity and propaganda. I feel of public information. At the Federal that some House committee should col- Reserve Board, for instance, a Mr. Elliott lect these facts,' that thereafter Con- Thurston is listed in the Official Register gress should determine a deflnit£*policy of the United States as "Assistant to the with respect to publicity, and that ap- Chairman." Now as a matter of fact, propriations should be confirmed by this Mr. Thurston is a former Washington policy. correspondent who is actually public inLet me make it abundantly plain that formation director for the Board. This is well known by newspapermen here I am not attacking the theory that Government needs information specialists who contact the Board for information. to help the radio and press get the facts. Yet, officially Mr. Thurston has nothing Nor am I criticizing press and radio for to do with public relations, but is listed utilizing such services. Beyond- any as an assistant to the Chairman. doubt there is a need in Washington for It is that Mr. a limited number of such information Thurston my understandingGovernment is the highest paid specialists. public-relations man In Washington. Newspapermen here inform me that The Official Register of, the United sopa^ of these press agents right now are F rming a number of valuable serv- States does not list his salary, but disi c e . For instance, I am told that pub- closes that his salary is paid from assesslic-relations men at the Labor and In- ments levied by the Board upon Federal . terior Departments have evoked an open- Reserve banks. Such disbursements by the banks natdoor policy. In other words, they encourage Washington correspondents to urally increase the cost of service to make inquiries and they help the cor- bank patrons. I fee} sure that the public respondents to get in touch with the and the banks would welcome some revproper officials. That undeniably is a elation by Congress concerning Mr. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Thursioq's position and duties. _ helpful public of St. Louis Federal Reserve Bankservice, SBC. 11. Nothing contained in section 13 of the act of March 13, 1899 (30 Stat. 1152; 33 U. S. C, 1940 ed., 407), shall be construed as forbidding the discharge of fluid garbage into the territorial waters of the United States. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE Any Member of the House can get some Idea of what this overgrown Federal publicity system Is costing the taxpayers by glancing at the 1947 Budget requests for the Office of the Secretary of Commerce. Under this office are listed the following publicity agents: Director of Publications, $10,000 a year salary. Assistant Director of Publications, $8,479 a year. Chief, Editorial Section, $8,180 a year. Chief, Publications Program, $8,180 a year. * Chief of the Field Publications Service, $7,342. Five information specialists, $29,525. Four city editors, $23,860. One Information specialist, $4,902. Head of the Publications Section, $4,902. Now bear in mind that these press agents are only those found in the office of the Secretary of Commerce. Many of the agencies in the Department have their own public information specialists listed separately. These figures do not include the salaries of those who grind out the material released. Just to give the Members of the House some idea of the hand-outs prepared and distributed daily by Government public information men I asked one of the news/^^jermen to save for me such handouts press releases received by his office in x day. Here they are. You can see they make up a pile about 2 inches thick. Any Member is perfectly welcome to look these over if he wishes. Here Is another phase of Government handouts which I think the House should look into. I hold in my hand a rather beautiful and cdmprehensive document printed in the Government Printing Office and compiled by the War Assets Administration. It numbers 16 pages printed on very high-grade glossy stock. It is well filled with excellent and costly art. It is pure undiluted propaganda. There is not one single word of news in it that would be regarded as legitimate copy by a good newspaper or magazine. Its real purpose is to convince Congress and the public that the War Assets Administration has been making a valuable tontribution to the Nation by selling war surpluses. That sort of thing should be stopped. Here is another example of Government publicity which I think should be given attention by this House. It is laughable, but it is costly. This is an official Department of Commerce press release setting forth the con- elusions of specialists in that Department who studied the establishment and operation of a book store. Here is their conclusion as set forth in this official release. I Quote: 995 pages of short two- or three-line paraMr. Speaker, I yield back the balance graphs which the administration hopes of my time. newspapers will use to fill in surplus The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. white space. I find it difficult to regard BISHOP). Under the previous order of this sort of activity as essential to the the House the gentleman from Wisconpress of the Nation. sin [Mr. BYRNES] is recognized for 30 I hold in my hand the Consumers' minutes. Guide, a Department of Agriculture pubTAX REDUCTION lication printed on good glossy paper Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. Mr. with plenty of pictures. How many Speaker, ever since this Congress conmagazines of this kind do you suppose • first part of the Government publishes? I would vened the considerable January, we have a like to know. We employ thousands of heard reducing taxes. amount of talk I do not believe people to furnish material to private about Member of publishers. Then we compete with there is any either who this House or of the not and them by publishing and distributing free does Senate that he canwouldgood connot hope with magazines. I have here a few press releases for science vote for isa areduction in taxes. course, most laudable obFebruary 8 and 9. These releases used This, of but I wonder, Mr. Speaker, jective, to be sent out on plain inexpensive pa- whether we have spent enough time talkper, but now I suppose that we are in ing about how we can accomplish this the money with a thirty-five billion dollar objective. We spend too much time, I tax income and the shooting war over. think, talking about formulas and overNow we must have colored letterheads. point: That In fact, the Public Relations Division of looking the most importantas we correwe can reduce taxes only the War Department now put their re- spondingly reduce expenditures. Mr. leases out with two-color jobs—the old Speaker, we must do two very definite red, white, and blue. things before we can reach the point Again, I want to emphasize my object where we discuss and talk formulas for is to obtain the definite facts for Con- tax reduction, in my opinion. In the gress. Talk to any Washington news- first place, we must balance the budget. paperman or radio man and you will get We cannot spend the same amount we all sorts of reactions and reports on have been spending in the past and still Government public information oper- balance our budget. In order, therefore, ations. Nobody seems to know what the » to accomplish even the first objective we program is or is intended to be. I feel** have got to start cutting, and cutting the time has come for Congress to lay deep. It amuses me very much, Mr. down a-definite policy for Government Speaker, to find gentlemen from the publicity. other side of the aisle here entering into Mr. VURSELL. Mr. Speaker, will the the discussion of tax reduction and tax gentleman yield? formulas when they themselves are comMr. MILLER of Connecticut. I yield. mitted to a Presidential budget which Mr. VURSELL. I presume a lot of under no stretch of the imagination can this excessive and useless mail comes leave room for any tax reduction. So I under what is called penalty mail in believe it would come with much better the Post Office Department. grace for them to stop talking about forMr. MII/TiER of Connecticut. It cer- mulas for reducing taxes and to start tainly is. There is no postage on any whittling away at their own Presidential and party budget. of it. Mr. VURSELL. Being a member of Before we talk about tax reductions the Post Office and Civil Service Commit- we must, I believe, make provision for tee, I find that in 1946 that Department a very substantial payment on the nastacked up-a deficit of something like . tional debt, and we cannot do even that $300,000,000. The President has called if we are going to accept the Presidenattention to this deficit and has recom- tial budget of $37,500,000,000. So that mended higher postal rates. Of that I believe the other side of the House deficit probably fifty or seventy-five might well give consideration to this facmillion is on account of the unnecessary tor before they inject themselves into and useless mail issued by the various the tax-reduction program. When we Federal departments, known as penalty do this, when we make provision for the mail. I do not know what can be done balancing of the budget, and when we about it, but I think the gentleman make provision, Mr. Speaker, for a subshould be commended for bringing this stantial payment on the national debt, to the attention of the House. Certainly . then is the time for making some cut one way to stop this would be to blast in taxes. out some of this bureaucracy, and put Mr. Speaker, am not saying these people, who have nothing to do ' three objectivesIare impossible, that these that they except to waste Government money, back cannot be achieved; in fact, Mr. Speakinto civilian life where they might pro- er, I very firmly believe that under the duce something to support the Govern- new controls in the House and in the ,<—vlt Is more important to be a smart busi- ment, rather than to ride and let their Senate and under the new philosophy Bsman than a bookworm If you are to make feet drag all the time at the expense of that should pervade as a result of that _ success of running a book store. the Government. change that all three of these objectives That, Mr. Speaker, is a Commerce DeMr. MTT-T-BfP- of Connecticut. That Is can and will be accomplished. But I partment press release edited and broad- exactly what I am trying to do. We want to warn the House and I want to cast at the taxpayers' expense. have to find out where these people warn the American public that those obI have here a handout which the Vet- are and under what title we will find jectives cannot be accomplished and will erans' Administration ~ probably will them on the pay roll. They will not be not be accomplished unless there is a deep-seated desire and a will to acmaintain is valuable http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ and indispensable. down there as publicity experts in many, tually cut expenditures to the bone. Mr. It is entitled "Fillers." It presents three many cases. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 996 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE Speaker, that is what we should concen- want Government to do more for them, In trate on today. That is what our ob- new price supports, production bonuses, and guaranteed high income. States want jective should be. The objectives, as far National Treasury to help out with supportthe of as the end results are concerned, namely, their schools. Old people want bigger penbalancing the Budget, making a substan- sions, bigger subsidies for State pension systial payment on the national debt, and tems. Then there are costly avlatlon-develcutting taxes, are very laudable, and, as opment plans, more loans to business, more I say, I believe they can be accomplished; money asked for subsidies. but, as in the war period, we had an ultiI continue further: mate objective, namely, the winning of The demand for more mon^y. for bigger the war. Where did we concentrate? spending, Is bipartisan, and shows a tendency We concentrated on a plan of operation to grow and not decline with the size of as to how to attain that ultimate ob- existing payments. jective. That is what we have got to do Further on and more or less in conclutoday. We have to draw up a plan of operation in order to cut expenditures sion of this article appears the following so as to make those things possible. This statement: All In all, except plan of operation, Mr. Speaker, should be vestigations of past for bills calling for InDemocratic administrato eliminate at least a minimum of $7,- tion and for regulation of labor unions, the 500,000,000 from the Presidential budget. mass of bills in Congress reflects an apparWe have got to spend more time talking, ently deep desire on the part of the American thinking, acting, and doing something people to get something for nothing. Memabout that. Then we can attain our ulti- bers of Congress propose a very great range of Ideas for pumping dollars out of the United mate objective of cutting taxes. Treasury the pockets of one Mr. KNUTSON. Mr. Speaker, will the States or another.and into same time, there is group At the gentleman yield? a strong desire to to lower Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. I yield to the national debt. reduce taxes* andCongress, No Member of the gentleman from Minnesota. however. Is offering a formula by which Mr. KNUTSON. The gentleman will h. nd-outs and subsidies can be stepped up agree that everything depends upon how by additional billions of dollars a year while high or how low a ceiling we place on taxes are being reduced and debt retired. the Budget. We will have to start from Yes; we talk on one hand of spending there. more money and we talk on the other Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. The genreducing taxes, but the formula tleman is absolutely correct, but I think hand ofpresented to show how you can is not he has to carry that one step further. 4£ possibly do It just cannot be done. Your budget top does not mean anything ~ You have tothat.first and then your taxes cut unless you are going to stick to it, stay can be cut, and you cannot increase your with it, and insist on it. expenditures without increasing your Mr. KNUTSON. The gentleman will taxes. recall that in the reorganization law it is Mr. RANKIN. provided that if the Congress exceeds the gentleman yield? Mr.JSpeaker, will the ceiling fixed on the Budget we will have Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. I to amend the War Debt Act to increase the gentleman from Mississippi. yield to the ceiling on the war debt? Mr. RANKIN. The gentleman would Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. The gen- not attempt to handicap the rural electleman is correct, but there is always trification program, would he, since that that loophole. That is what I am worry- money all comes back? It is merely a ing about, and I say that every Member loan to the farmers to build their own of the House and every citizen of this lines, and comes back with interest. country should worry about that. They Mr. BYRNES of am not should not forget that you cannot give talking about anyWisconsin. I in that specific cut a dollar in tax reduction until you take connection, that dollar off your expenditures. That have got to but I do say this, that we adopt an attitude that if Is where we have to concentrate. definite economies can at the present Mr. KNUTSON. The great danger to time be made in rural electrification, the program, as I see it, is that too many they must be .made, in spite of our inMembers may listen to false prophets. dividual desire to see a greater expansion Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. I think made. That is true of all programs,'and the gentleman is very right in that state- there is one place, Mr. Speaker, I think, ment. The reason I think it is neces- where we are running into difficulty. We sary to take the floor at this time to try are inclined to take the attitude that it in my little voice to emphasize this ne- - ls all well and good to cut the other felcessity for reduction of expenditures is low, but "do not cut me," and that is the fact that we have still prevailing in a philosophy that we cannot let continue the Congress, in the House of Repre- if there is going to be any cutting at all. sentatives at least, the theory that we There are several specific things that can keep on going and spending on new I think this Government must do, and things or more things, continuing on and I would like to just point them out. In still be able to accomplish the three ob- the first place, we must shut our eyes and jectives which I have mentioned. I our ears against new proposals for exthink it is a sad commentary to read an penditures. We have got to make up our article in the January 31 issue of the minds that we are going to resist all presUnited States News. It is a very factual sures for increases in Federal expendistatement, and I want to call It to the tures, for new aids to groups or to States attention of the House. Here is what or to local units of government; that for the article states: the time being, at least until we get our The "gimme" theme still dominates, even financial house in order, we must close the door to new expenditures. in FRASER Digitized for this period of roaring prosperity. VeterNo. 2. We must cut drastically our ans want more billions when already they http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ present proposed expenditures, and this are receiving $7,000,000,000 a year. Fanners Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEBRUARY has to be done in two places: First,. . the operation even of necessary governments activities', and then, second, we must cut out a lot of activities that are not in and of themselves absolutely essential or that cannot be performed by other units of Government. Let us look for a moment at necessary governmental activities. We know that there is needless and top-heavy personnel and overlapping expenditures, and those must be investigated thoroughly. I know that the various subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations are working hard in examining under a microscope these various departments and other activities to cut out this deadwood and overlapping. They must jump on the necks of every department or employee that spends one needless dollar. Then, Mr. Speaker, we have got to back those subcommittees up because it will not do any good for them to come in with a proposal for a cut and a proposal for economies in departmental activities if the House itself is going to overrule them and say, "No; we have got to keep this or that appropriation up." We have got to stand by the subcommittees of our Committee on Appropriations when they make their cuts. Mr. KNUTSON. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. I yield to the gentleman from Minnesota. Mr. KNUTSON. I think the gen man from Wisconsin, who has mad». very careful study of this question, will agree that it is necessary to keep the Federal spending at $32,000,000,000 or less if we are to have any tax reduction. Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. In fact, I believe we should have a minimum cut of $7,500,000,000, which would bring the budget down to $30,000,000,000. Mr. KNUTSON. Of course, there are those who claim that the budget can be cut down to $28,000,000,000; I do not know. But I am satisfied it can be brought down to $32,000,000,000 without in any way impairing the national defense, our obligation to the veterans, and for all needed expenditures for necessary Government activities. Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. The gentleman is- absolutely right. If we'have the determination to do it, and the will do it, and I sincerely hope we have, the cuts can be made. But, we must become a little more worried as to whether or not we are going to reach that objective. We must keep it constantly in our minds. Mr. KNUTSON. I think the gentleman's fears are well founded because we detect on both sides of the aisle that spreading disease that calls for spending and spending, and taxing and taxing. Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin. The gentleman is right. There are bills p f posed in this House every day. I wi an analysis of them could be made. But there are bills and resolutions introduced in this House every day for spending more money to start some new project. Now, you cannot do that on one hand, and on the other hand say, "We are going to balance the budget, and make a payment on the national debt.