The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
DIARY Book 582 November 6 -9, 1942 Book Page Advertising Council See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds Airplanes Deliveries by type and date, November 1941--October 1942, reviewed by General Arnold for HMJr - 11/6/42 Aircraft flight delivery - British Air Commission report 11/6/42. Aircraft despatched, week ending November 3, 1942 British Air Commission report - 11/9/42 582 94 96 385 Argentina See Latin America -BBoard of Economic Warfare 139 Meeting - 11/7/42 a) Discussion of 1) Cryptostegia (trop'cal Indian vine - source of rubber) - report on 2) Swedish trade - further report on a) Resolution as sent to Vice President - 142 145,148 11/14/42: See Book 584, page 97 b) Wallace sends report to FDR who asks HMJr and Patterson to talk over and make recommendations - 11/17/42: Book 585, page 270 Business Conditions Haas memorandum on situation, week ending November 7, 340 1942 - 11/9/42 CCensorship, Office of See Foreign Funds Control Chicago Bridge and Iron Company Plant at Newburgh, New York, for floating dry-docks - political situation discussed in Forrestal correspondence - 11/9/42 Correspondence 327 86 Mrs. Forbush's mail report - 11/6/42 Cryptostegia See Board of Economic Warfare -D Davis, Elmer See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds 1) Patterson-HMJr conversation - 11/18/42: Book 586, pages 153 and 208 - D - (Continued) Book Page Deferments, Military Selective Service and Civil Service ask that draft boards be furnished with the names of 3-A (married men with dependents) employees occupying key positions for consideration in connection with Class 3-B a) Paul opinion on - 11/9/42 582 316 -EEconomic Stabilization Board See Inflation Exports To Russia, Free China, and selected blocked countries, during 10-day period ending October 20, 1942 11/9/42 359,366 F- Financing, Government Government securities - recent changes in prices and yields: Haas memorandum - 11/6/42 31 Federal Reserve operations in Government securities 11/7/42 War Savings Bonds: 128 In connection with November and December financing, HMJr, Bell, Graves, and Buffington talk over War Bond quotas - 11/6/42 1 a) Eccles conference discussed between HMJr and Graves; Eccles' desire to set up new State offices with paid staffs to be reviewed 11/7/42 115,117 b) Elmer Davis--MMJr conversation on "$10- to $13 billion before Christmas" - 11/9/42 c) Miller McClintock (Advertising Council)--MMJr conversation concerning "$10- to $13 billion before Christmas' - 11/9/42 1) Conversation repeated to Kuhn, Odegard, and Gamble a) Harold Thomas suggested d) Wanders (George) suggested to HMJr by Gamble 11/9/42 190 194 199 196 254 1) Herald Tribune asked to loan for two months: Book 583, page 362 Payroll Savings Plan: New York City situation discussed in Kuhn memorandum 11/6/42 Analysis as of October 31, 1942 - 11/6/42 Navy Department report for first year - 11/9/42 Newspaper (large city) coverage - report on - 11/9/42. Pearl Harbor anniversary drive - outline for 11/9/42 2) Mrs. Reid agrees - 11/20/42: Book 587, pages 61 and 65 24,26 27 264,267 269 276 - F - (Continued) Book Page Foreign Funds Control Office of Censorship-Foreign Funds Control relation discussed in Paul memorandum - 11/6/42 582 63 France: American Red Cross shipments of food for distribution to French prisoners of war: FDR and HMJr decide to permit payment of present shipment and "keep entire situation on 24-hour basis" - 11/6/42 a) Discussion by 9:30 group - 11/9/42 b) Breckenridge Long and HMJr discuss - 11/6/42 c) Letter to American Red Cross - 11/10/42: 59,376 183 58-A See Book 583. page 137 All France within continental Europe declared "enemy territory" - 11/9/42 375 11/9/42 378 French North Africa reviewed in Paul memorandum - Over-all picture reviewed by Paul - 11/12/42: Book 583, page 386 "French goods destined for North Africa but stranded in United States" - Paul memorandum - 11/17/42: Book 585, page 237 France See also Foreign Funds Control All France within continental Europe declared "enemy territory" - 11/9/42 375 -IInflation Paul speech, "Taxation and Consumer Spending": Comment by Office of War Information transmitted to HMJr 11/7/42 126 Economic Stabilization Board: Conference to discuss Treasury memorandum on "Treasury Department role in economic stabilization"; present: HMJr, Paul, White, Haas, and Gaston - 11/9/42 a) Drafts of memorandum b) Byrnes-HMJr conversation 204 215,235 248 Conference; present: HMJr, Bell, White, Paul, Haas, Stewart, and Gaston - 11/10/42: Book 583, page 27 a) Cohen's memorandum: "Tentative tax and savings program for 1943: Book 583, page 41 Inter-American Financial and Economic Advisory Committee See Latin America -LLatin America Inter-American Financial and Economic Advisory Committee: Treasury representation on discussed in Treasury-State correspondence - 11/9/42 Argentina: Cochran-Meltzer mission - Paul memorandum concerning - 11/6/42 a) Treasury letter to State Department concerning implementation of Argentine financial program 11/6/42 (See also Book 583, page 139 - ii/io/42) 382 72 75 - L - (Continued) Book Page 582 133 Lend-Lease Procedure covering procurement of war materials constituting "an emergency purchase of war material abroad" covered in Treasury-War Department correspondence - 11/7/42 U.S.S.R. Conference in Stettinius' office to discuss (a) supplying food to Soviet Government, and (b) shipping facilities - Mack memorandum - 11/6/42 Items purchased by Procurement and available to U.S.S.R. during November listed for FDR - 11/9/42 United Kingdom: Federal Reserve Bank of New York statement showing dollar disbursements, week ending October 28, 1942 I 11/6/42 65 372 103 -M- McClintock, Miller (Advertising Council) See Financing, Government War Savings Bonds Military Reports 108,169,170 British operations - 11/6/42, etc 387,388 Bombing Raids over Western Europe during October 1942 - Hoflich report - 11/6/42 British Offensive in Egypt - Hoflich report - 11/6/42 Office of War Information report - 11/6/42 Murray, James E. (Senator, Montana) See Small Business -NNavy Department See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds (Payroll Savings Plan) New York City See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds (Payroll Savings Plan) Revenue Revision # Newspapers See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds -0Office of Censorship See Foreign Funds Control 109 112 114 -PBook Page Paul, Randolph Speech entitled "Taxation and Consumer Spending": Comment by Office of War Information transmitted to 582 HMJr - 11/7/42 126 Pearl Harbor Anniversary See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds Portugal Supply Purchase Negotiations: HMJr recommends to FDR 11/9/42 357 Procurement Division Distribution and utilisation of shortage supplies and equipment for United States Government: Executive Order 9235 covering - Mack memorandum concerning 67 11/6/42 -RRevenue Revision New York City need for tabulation machines in connection with withholding tax discussed in LaGuardia-Treasury correspondence - 11/7/42. a) Mack memorandum: See Book 585, page 216 120 b) Preference Rating Certificate sent LaGuardia - 11/17/42: Book 585, page 200 Doughton's attitude toward Treasury discussed by 9:30 group - 11/9/42. 180 -SSilver Spain: Final report on expenses in connection with Spanish silver purchased by United States in 1938 11/9/42. 356 a) State Department letter (withdrawn) concerning litigation costs and counsel fees: Book 584, page 93 1) Acheson-HMJr conversation - 11/17/42: Book 585, page 45 (See also Book 586, page 146 - 11/18/42) Small Business Murray (Senator, Montana)--Treasury correspondence 11/9/42 333 (See also Book 592, page 186) Spain See Silver Sweden See Board of Economic Warfare -T"Taxation and Consumer Spending" Speech by Paul: Comment by Office of War Information transmitted to HMJr - 11/7/42 Thomas, Harold See Financing, Government: War Savings Bonds 126 -UU.S.S.R. See Lend-Lease Wanders, George See Financing, Government War Savings Bonds See Financing, Government War Department See Lend-Lease 1 November 6, 1942 9:00 a.m. WAR BONDS Present: Mr. Bell Mr. Graves Mr. Buffington H.M.JR: This is the thing that worries these people, and I hope I didn't give you a bad night. MR. GRAVES: You did; I had a bad night, but that is all right. H.M.JR: Did I give you a bad night? Didn't you sleep? MR. GRAVES: Not much. H.M.JR: I am sorry; I shouldn't have called you at ten o'clock. What these boys want to do is to start a campaign along about the 24th and between that time and the first of January sell between ten and thirteen billion dollars worth of securities - of which they credit war bonds with how much? MR. BELL: I put in a billion eight hundred seventyfive. That is what is in my estimate. MR. GRAVES: That is for that period? MR. BELL: Yes, November and December, and I hope that that may be increased by enough to make it up to two and a half by a little drive. MR. GRAVES: I think that war bonds can do four billion dollars during November, December, and January. 2 -2MR. BELL: Well, that is about right. MR. GRAVES: That is about our quota. MR. BELL: I have already a billion seven for you in my estimates for January. That makes four, two, if we get this two and a half I am speaking of. MR. GRAVES: Our estimate which I have given to Haas was a billion eight for November and December, but for January we were figuring on two billion. MR. BELL: A billion sevenH.M.JR: They have a billion eight hundred and seventy-five for Savings Bonds. MR. BELL: The last estimate for January from Harold was a billion eight hundred and seventy-five. MR. GRAVES: That didn't come from me. MR. BELL: Yes, it did, from your force. MR. GRAVES: I think that is the quota we had, Dan, which Mr. Haas' people computed, but we have been figur- ing all the time on two billion dollars for January. H.M.JR: Two billion dollars for what? MR. GRAVES: January. H.M.JR: January does not interest me. In this figure here for November and December - for sixty days you are down for one billion eight hundred and seventyfive. MR. GRAVES: We ought to do it. H.M.JR: And a possible two and a half, but at the minimum of one billion eight hundred and seventy-five. 3 -3MR. GRAVES: That is our figure. H.M.JR: Is that within the realms of possibility? MR. GRAVES: That is right. H.M.JR: Is that a minimum figure? MR. GRAVES: No, I wouldn't say that it is a minimum figure. I would say that it is a fair figure to set for us. MR. BELL: That is a billion eight hundred and seventy-five million in December. H.M.JR: But these are your figures. MR. GRAVES: That is right. H.M.JR: This is what worried us, and this is why I called you. We will come down to facts, but I want to straighten out the record. We want to settle once and for all how much this Victory Fund Committee can do, how much we can rely on; and the only worry that they have, as far as saying they will deliver it, is that your people will be calling on members of their security salesmen's organization, which would interfere. Now, I made a proposal which is entirely satisfactory to them, and then they said that they would have no alibi. They are all coming here Monday. If I simply say to the representatives of the securities salesmen in here Monday, "Now for November and December I want you to work exclusively for the Victory Fund Committee, I don't want you to work for any State administrator"-MR. GRAVES: That is the way it is now. H.M.JR: Well, it isn't-MR. GRAVES: You remember your telegram? 3 -3MR. GRAVES: That is our figure. H.M.JR: Is that within the realms of possibility? MR. GRAVES: That is right. H.M.JR: Is that a minimum figure? MR. GRAVES: No, I wouldn't say that it is a minimum figure. I would say that it is a fair figure to set for us. MR. BELL: That is a billion eight hundred and seventy-five million in December. H.M.JR: But these are your figures. MR. GRAVES: That is right. H.M.JR: This is what worried us, and this is why I called you. We will come down to facts, but I want to straighten out the record. We want to settle once and for all how much this Victory Fund Committee can do, how much we can rely on; and the only worry that they have, as far as saying they will deliver it, is that your people will be calling on members of their security salesmen's organization, which would inter- fere. Now, I made a proposal which is entirely satisfactory to them, and then they said that they would have no alibi. They are all coming here Monday. If I simply say to the representatives of the securities salesmen in here Monday, "Now for November and December I want you to work exclusively for the Victory Fund Committee, I don't want you to work for any State administrator"MR. GRAVES: That is the way it is now. H.M.JR: Well, it isn't-MR. GRAVES: You remember your telegram? 4 -4- H.M.JR: Well, it evidently isn't. Let me just run through my story; then we will break it down. (Mr. Buffington entered the conference.) H.M.JR: But when I say that to them, I am going to say to them, "I expect you to sell all the securities available that are for sale by the Treasury." In other words, when they go out, using my Crowell Publishing example - Crowell used to have seventy-five kinds of magazines, and the Crowell Publishing subscription salesmen would sell any one of seven or the combination. When the Victory Fund goes out, they will have in their portfolio every available security. If they sold an "E" or an "F" and "G," as far as the credit would go it would pile up to your organization. They don't care about the credit, but what they would like me to say - and nothing is settled, it is all fluid - to their group Monday is, "Now, as Secretary of the Treasury I am asking you, members of the securities organization of America, to devote yourselves exclusively to the Victory Fund for November and December." See? MR. GRAVES: By that you mean they would not do any private business? H.M.JR: No, no, that they wouldn't work for any State Administrator. MR. GRAVES: That is the present status of things as a result of your telegram of the 27th day of August which I have here. They were told exactly that. That is Mr. Buffington's-MR. BUFFINGTON: That is a little different. The Secretary is speaking now about them not working as individuals. MR. GRAVES: Oh, as individuals. You see the Victory Fund Committees since that wire have not been working as committees. 5 -5H.M.JR: No, but I am talking now as individuals. MR. GRAVES: That would be perfectly all right. H.M.JR: As individuals. But I want to go over it again so it is perfectly clear. When they call on the fellow and the fellow says, I don't want your tap, but I want the 'F' and 'G,'n let them take that. MR. GRAVES: We would welcome that. H.M.JR: That is the result of last night's conference, subject to giving you ample time to think about it. MR. GRAVES: I see no objection to that. That is, there would be instances, I suspect, of where one of these fellows would have to choose whether he is to remain a member of the Victory Fund Committee or a member of our shop, because there are instances where a fellow is in both organizations. Such a man, I should think, would have to decide-- H.M.JR: Well, it is a free country, and-MR. GRAVES: whether he is going to continue to be a member of the Victory Fund Committee. H.M.JR: it is getting freer every day. (Laughter) MR. GRAVES: I see no objection to it at all. In fact, I think that would be welcomed. H.M.JR: George said that if I said the word - so there can be no mi sunderstanding - on Monday to the "Union of Security Salesmen of America," "I want you to work exclusively for the Victory Fund," that means they will work exclusively for the Victory Fund. MR. GRAVES: That is all right. 6 -6MR. BUFFINGTON: What is happening in Cleveland is that Percy Brown-- MR. GRAVES: There is a good example. Percy Brown, who is an investment man, is our county chairman for that very large community. That is, his activities include everything, payroll savings, women's activities, schools, everything comes under Percy Brown. I don't know whether he is a member of the Victory Fund or not. MR. BUFFINGTON: He stands very well in the securities industry. MR. GRAVES: I assumed he would go right on. MR. BUFFINGTON: He is now, as I understand it, asking members of the industry to become a member of his "F" and "G" Committee for this drive. What I feel would be confusing would be to have these two bosses. MR. GRAVES: Tell them not to invite members of the Victory Fund Committee under any circumstances to be members of your organization. H.M.JR: No, I want to go further than that. I don't want your people to invite security salesmen who belong to the "Union of Security Salesmen-MR. GRAVES: to be members of the War Savings. That is exactly what I was trying to say. H.M.JR: That is, further - because a man could be very well a security salesman and not be a member of the Victory Fund Committee. MR. GRAVES: I see what you mean. MR. BUFFINGTON: But he would be utilized during this campaign by the Victory Fund Committee. H.M.JR: You could very well, I am sure, go down Wall Street and go into security houses and find 7 -7 a lot of people that are members of neither Victory Fund nor yours. Now in your campaign for "F" and "G" and your campaign to sell all issues, we are going to call on an all-out effort of all security salesmen, and we want the "Union of Security Salesmen" to work exclusively for the Victory Fund Committee. MR. GRAVES: That is all right. H.M.JR: So we draw the line - I mean, there is a clean-cut thing. I want all security salesmen either to work for the Victory Fund Committee or for nobody - that is what it amounts to - plus, you said, certain banks. MR. BUFFINGTON: Well, the banking people who are now actively working with the Victory Fund Committee. H.M.JR: Now, to explain that so there is no misunderstanding~ - MR. BUFFINGTON: The Victory Fund Committee has a series of members of regional and sub-regional committees who are now devoting all their time to the work of the committee. I think it would be too bad if those same men were asked to do the dual job, likewise. MR. GRAVES: Illustrate, John; offhand I don't know of any. MR. BUFFINGTON: Well, I don't know that I can, Harold. Take George Rand of Buffalo or Harriman of the Manufacturing People's Trust Company. His bank has been interested in doing a certain amount of work for War Savings. The main amount of his time is spent on activities of the Victory Fund Committee. If he were asked to work for the State Administrator on the "F" and "G" bond drive and at the same time were asked to do this over-all job, I think again he would be looking to two people. H.M.JR: Excuse me - wouldn't this answer this question, if Harold Graves would send out instructions 8 -8to his forty-eight State Administrators simply saying, "From now on, please do not solicit any members who are members of the Victory Fund Committee or men who are security salesmen to assist you in your work." MR. GRAVES: That is all right. We can do that. That is no problem, except as to people who are already in our organization. H.M.JR: Now, you do that. I mean, if you agree to send out such a telegram, then when these fellows come in Monday they will say that they will do that I want. Now, I will say, "All right, I want the security salesmen of America to devote themselves exclusively to the Victory Fund Committee. With that set up and I want them to sell all Treasury securities-MR. GRAVES: Yes. MR. BUFFINGTON: Under the direction of the Victory Fund Committee. MR. GRAVES: That is all right. H.M.JR: Let me take a look. I can't look at more than one person at a time. Bell? MR. BELL: I think that is fine. You say that you didn't put any time limit on it. You want that to hold from here on, or is it just for this drive? I take it that after the drive is over we won't have a drive every month. MR. GRAVES: It would look a great deal better if only for this period. H.M.JR: For November and December - why not let's say for the balance of this year? MR. BUFFINGTON: The balance of this calendar year. 9 -9H.M.JR: Let's say for between now and the first of January. How is that? MR. BUFFINGTON: Fine. MR. GRAVES: Mention the reason, which is that these fellows are going to be busy on this other. H.M.JR: Here is the trouble. You can't say they are busy on the drive for us, because we have not even talked to Ecoles about this drive of ours. Do you see what I mean? MR. BUFFINGTON: I rather agree with the Secretary that if at his instructions they are going to do this for November and December, that is sufficient reason. MR. BELL: Yes, but that either throws some onus on the War Savings Staff, or it gives away the drive. Now, which do you want? MR. GRAVES: You see my point, if you just send out a naked wire, people will say, "Oh, more trouble." H.M.JR: How about if we wait until we are ready to announce the drive? MR. BUFFINGTON: Just a second. They are now in the process in these different states of actively - yesterday and today - getting these people and talking to these people about assisting the State Administrators. I think the sooner that can be done, the more completely it is clarified and there will be less confusion. MR. BELL: Would Monday be too late? MR. GRAVES: I think we had better have our people get on the telephone and explain it to our people. H.M.JR: There are only ten States. 10 - 10 MR. GRAVES: That is right, we can do it in those places that are crucial and explain exactly why, and tell them that we wouldn't like anything to be said about this until this drive is determined. In that way we assign a reason, and it makes it a whole lot better looking than if we just send out instructions like that which many people would say is evidence of further trouble. That would be much better. H.M.JR: Will you set me straight as to when I said this "F" and "G" drive was going ahead? MR. GRAVES: Yes, sir, here is the agenda of your Kansas City meeting, and you will notice there under "F" and "G" what is said. Then you remember, too, that Mr. Harrison came in to see you, I would say-- H.M.JR: But, Harold, there is nothing here about a drive. MR. GRAVES: Yes, canvassers-- H.M.JR: That means something to you, but even now - I mean, there is nothing there about there being a drive from the 15th of November. MR. GRAVES: At that time we hadn't set any precise time for this except we have asked our people to complete it by the end of December, and they started as soon as they could, but we fixed no beginning date, except that the New York people have established their beginning date as the 15th of November. In connection with this Harrison came in here to offer to you-H.M.JR: I thought it was the "E" Bonds. MR. GRAVES: No, no, "F" and "G." You remember, you brought him down to my office. H.M.JR: Then I followed through. Something came up and nothing happened. 11 - 11 MR. GRAVES: There is your memorandum to me and mine. to you. MR. BUFFINGTON: Is that industrial men? MR. GRAVES: That is underwriters. Harrison is chairman of the Industry Committee. MR. BUFFINGTON: There are two groups, the mis- cellaneous underwriting group and the industrial insurance salesmen. MR. GRAVES: This is the whole insurance industry. H.M.JR: But this does not - you see, all I am doing now is to sum up once more so we understand each other. The only difference is that the security salesmen ask to work for the Victory Fund, and let the Victory Fund Committee sell all securities, which I don't think they have done before. MR. GRAVES: They sold "F" and "G" for the period May through August. H.M.JR: I mean on this thing for November and December. MR. GRAVES: I will be delighted with that. H.M.JR: Fine; and as we get along Monday, we come to some decision; and before I once more decide anything, you sit in and talk with me personally; and then when we do decide, you will go down there with me and I will make the announcement. Then I thought it would be very nice if you followed up and said that this was pleasing to you and you would be more than pleased to have them sell everything, and that your organization is available to cooperate, and so forth, and so on. But, as I say, before anything becomes definite, as far as I am concernad it will have to be in writing, because there has been so much discussion about this, you see. 12 - 12 MR. GRAVES: There are some, as I mentioned a minute ago, who have something to do with our present personnel. Percy Brown was an illustration. Nevil Ford is another one, and John Richards in Los Angeles is another one, and Howard Knowlee is another. In other words, we have in our regular organization quite a number. Ford is a partner in the First Boston Company. MR. BUFFINGTON: But quite a number of those people are also working for the Victory Fund Committee. MR. GRAVES: I suppose you wouldn't want this arrangement to affect people who have been in our organization for many months. H.M.JR: No, I don't want Nevil Ford to resign. MR. BUFFINGTON: I am thinking of the volunteer worker and the members of the Victory Fund Committee. MR. GRAVES: As to those, they are all right; we will accept them if they want to stay. H.M.JR: Supposing a half a dozen men that have important positions - I take it that they would stay, but the thing that Buffington-MR. BUFFINGTON: The solicitation of volunteers. H.M.JR: Let's for heaven's sake, in this room lay all the cards - if there is anything in your (Buffington) mind, say 80. MR. BUFFINGTON: It will take the confusion away, working to the advantage of both of us. H.M.JR: I am sorry I gave you a bad night, but after calling you I thought this one up. MR. GRAVES: That is very satisfactory. H.M.JR: Now, the same for you (Graves.). If you have got anything in your mind, say it or keep your peace. MR. GRAVES: No, I haven't anything. We will have to start over again in certain States where we have already begun to draw these people into our set-up, but that is all right. 13 - 13 - H.M.JR: Now, the other thing that we are thinking about - I want to tell you, and then you remind me, Dan, if there is anything else we talked of that would be of interest to Harold - the Federal Reserve Board has made an offer that they are willing to put up five million dollars to pay the salesmen for these a weekly salary. MR. BELL: While they are working. H.M.JR: While they are working. I am turning that down because, in the room here, I don't want the Federal Reserve paying - controlling the purse strings, you see. MR. GRAVES: That is right. H.M.JR: Now, George Haas and Murphy and Buffington agree with me. Bell does not. So Bell is overruled. But I mean-- MR. BELL: I agree that this is the best way to do it, but I don't have the fears that you do about not controlling personnel. H.M.JR: What we are thinking about is the possibility of asking Congress for an appropriation to pay for these men or their organizations out-of-pocket expense rather than a commission. What I am looking forward to - and this is not going to be decided today or tomorrow or the next day, so you have time - I am looking forward - after all, I have always talked a long war. I don't think it is going to be nearly as long as I thought it was since I have been in England, but any- way, these fellows get fifty or seventy-five dollars a week - whatever it is - from their firms when they are actually working for us. What I want you to think of is - what it really amounts to is, can you maintain your E Bond organization on its present status. MR. GRAVES: If the other organization gets on a compensated basis-- 14 - 14 H.M.JR: Now you can think that thing over and when you have talked it over with your boys, come back, seek me out, and talk to me. MR. GRAVES: How much time have we? MR. BELL: We probably won't go to Congress until the first of January for money. MR. GRAVES: In other words, we have plenty of time - not forty-eight hours or anything like that. H.M.JR: I would like to talk to you again about it beginning with Monday. MR. GRAVES: I will be ready. H.M.JR: I would like you to be ready by Monday to talk about it. No, I didn't agree with you, Dan. MR. BELL: You said during this drive we wouldn't have that problem. H.M.JR: I might go to the Bureau of the Budget and ask for an appropriation if I decided this is what I want to do. I might want to go to the Bureau and start the thing within the Bureau. MR. BELL: Well, within the next-H.M.JR: Couple of weeks. MR. BELL: That is all right. H.M.JR: But I am putting Harold on notice, and I don't know that I want to do it. MR. GRAVES: I have a good deal of information about that. I don't know whether you remember, but we got the balance of our funds for the fiscal year '42, bringing the total of the appropriation for expenses of loans up to twenty-six millions, as I remember. That 3 15 - 15 got into the newspapers as being an appropriation to compensate people to sell war savings bonds, and we had hell to pay. H.M.JR: With whom? MR. GRAVES: With a great many States because of protests coming from the citizens, objecting to the creation of a paid force to sell war bonds. Now, that was war savings securities that were involved in those stories. We had trouble in New Hampshire; we had trouble in North Carolina. H.M.JR: Well, I have got to settle this immediate campaign. I have got to get busy to sell from ten-MR. BUFFINGTON: The answer to that is that if you are going to use this professional group, and deny them the right to sell securities, by which they make a living, they are going to have to be reimbursed for their time or I don't think they are going to function for any period. MR. GRAVES: Well, you will have that trouble. Once it is known, you will have a lot of protests, just as we had. MR. BUFFINGTON: . Didn't that develop on the basis of commissions, Harold? MR. GRAVES: No. We will be ready to discuss that with you. I will talk with Peter. H.M.JR: This drive does not hinge on whether we pay them or not. Is that right, George? MR. BUFFINGTON: As far as payment for this drive is concerned, but I think that something should be said to these men that the thing is being given consideration. H.M.JR: No, I won't say that on Monday because I won't have time to think it through. As soon as - I 16 - 16 - don't want to raise their hopes and say I thought of it and then turned it down. When I get ready to say some- thing I am going to do it; the rest of the time I am going to keep my mouth shut. MR. GRAVES: There is one other thing I think I should tell you, since apparently I hadn't made this clear before. In every State we have given instructions to our people to organize a force of people - insurance people and others - to canvass all F and G prospects by the end of December. As I understand, nothing is being said here that would interfere with our going ahead with that program. H.M.JR: No, but what I want you to do for me, I want you to ask somebody like Moody's, one of these investment councils - Standard Statistics - whether they would mail, or ask each of them if they would mail a thousand post cards, with a return post card attached, to their list - a thousand names on their list. On that post card I want to ask their customers if they have ever been solicited by a representative of the Treasury to buy a Government security; then if so, by whom. I would like to have that post card written today, with Bell having a chance to look at it, and Buffington, and have it go to the printer tonight. I want two thousand post cards, and if possible - a thousand to Standard Statistics and a thousand to Moody's. Now, the statement has been made by different people, like Mr. Shields and Stewart, that they have talked to a hundred and fifty people and not one has ever been solicited for Government bonds. You know my method of finding out. It is this way; if we sent two thousand return post cards to a list of people who get security letters, like Standard Statistics, they would be the people - Moody's and Standard Statistics - people who would be interested in wealth and not in the E Bonds. I would like to have those things so that the post cards could be printed and possibly go up to these people by Monday and have them address them and in the mail Monday night. 17 - 17 That is the schedule. I don't want to see them again, but I would like Bell and Buffington - the three of you - to do it. Then, who would those come back to? Who would they be addressed to? MR. GRAVES: They would come back to those services. MR. BELL: Yes, they probably wouldn't want to give you the names of their customers. MR. GRAVES: Then delivered in bulk to us. H.M.JR: Then they could analyze them. That would give us some idea, if a man like Shields is correct that there are a hundred and fifty of his friends who have never been solicited for Government bonds. But this does not interfere with your plans to go ahead. The only change is the Victory Fund people will have a full portfolio, 80 when they call on a prospect - and their people would be the ones with wealth - they can sell anything that they want; and the F and G Bond is more attractive than the tap issue. MR. BUFFINGTON: Harold, it will also eliminate that 80-called sabotage where our man does not have the F Bond and urges him to buy the tap before he buys a quota of G's. We are not giving him a good invest- ment policy, and that will eliminate that. MR. GRAVES: I am for it. It is O.K. H.M.JR: But I would like those two thousand post cards in the mail by Monday night. Now, Bell, what have I overlooked? MR. BELL: I don't think you have overlooked any- thing. H.M.JR: George? 18 - 18 MR. BUFFINGTON: There is just one point I would like to call to your attention. These men have just completed, in October, an intensive thirty-day drive on these Tax Savings Notes. Now they are coming along, right on top of that, for another extended period. I just want to offer as a suggestion, that if something could be said - that thought is being given to working out-- H.M.JR: I can't do it, George. Now don't push me on it. Now, you asked for this other thing; I am straightening this thing out, and I am not going to hold out promises that I can't make good on. There is no use pushing me on a thing like that. If I just hint - if there is any doubt in your mind, without my holding any carrot before their noses, that they can't do it, then I want to know it now. all. MR. BUFFINGTON: There is no doubt in my mind at H.M.JR: I am in the frame of mind - I have got to have successes around me. Now, there is thirteen billion dollars at stake, and if there is any doubt in your mind that these fellows will go through after what I have just done here, without my holding a carrot - for goodness sake, say so. MR. BUFFINGTON: There is no doubt in my mind about it; I was only trying to make as good a showing as I can. H.M.JR: No, now come a thousand percent clean. MR. BUFFINGTON: There is no doubt in my mind about these men doing a good job on this all-out drive. H.M.JR: Now, I may not be able to say anything to them until after the first of January, and I am not going to say anything to them until after I have made up my mind - after taking the advice of everybody. That is the thing we want to do, and I have certainly first got to talk with the SEC. I have got to talk 19 - 19 with them just as a matter of common decency. Don't you think so? MR. BELL: I see no harm, but I see no reason for talking to them. H.M.JR: It would be a nice thing to do. Now let's go through this once more, George. I am fast crystallizing on a program here, and I am relying on your men to put this thing over. MR. BUFFINGTON: I restate my position that the Victory Fund Committee and the Securities Industry will go all-out on this drive and do a good job without anything being said at all. H.M.JR: All right, O.K. You are dealing with a tough guy, you know, and I don't believe in hints, George; it is the worst kind of thing. I have always said, and these men have heard me say it, I have only one thing in politics that is worth a damn in this town, and that is a fellow's word. Now, I went all through that with the banking fraternity, once. Something was said - I forget what it was, but Randolph Burgess claimed I had hinted something I would do for the banks. I couldn't remember what it was. It was bad for the Treasury, but he said they had gotten the im- pression that that was what I was going to do. Well, I believed him. He said they had the impression, nothing in writing. All right - and we went through and had the thing changed. In other words, they could come back and say that Mr. Morgenthau gave them the impression that he was going to give them this salary, and there I am hooked. MR. BUFFINGTON: But these men are going to do the job, and the only reason I even mentioned it this morning was in an effort to get the best possible job. H.M.JR: O.K. You are a salesman, but when you push me too hard, I push back. Just so we understand each other. 20 - 20 MR. BELL: Of course you might, Mr. Secretary, make up your mind before this drive has gone very far, and then you can say something. H.M.JR: That is O.K., but I am not going to say one damn thing to George 80 that he can't say that he got an impression this morning. If we decided, and Harold Graves comes around and begs me to do it-(Laughter) MR. BUFFINGTON: That is all right. MR. GRAVES: I may come around and beg you not to do it. MR. BELL: We may not do that, but I think we have got to do something, Harold. We have either got to go this way and expand this organization or we are going to expand your organization to take in the whole job, be- cause I don't think we can spend all the time and effort and money on twenty percent of our financing and leave the other eighty percent hanging out in the air. The Secretary is subject to too much criticism. Every month he comes against the gun and has a banking issue, and I think we have reached the end of our ropes on that. I think we have got to do something else. That is my worry. MR. GRAVES: I didn't want to be giving a final impression. H.M.JR: I am glad you said that because you said that to me last night. MR. BELL: I am a little worried about our position, frankly. H.M.JR: Any more confessions? I have invited Mr. Grant, vice president of General Motors, to come in. I just want to talk to him about our sales effort. As you know, I have been quite an admirer of his right along as to his ability in the past as a national sales manager. How much does he know about our sales organization? 21 - 21 MR. GRAVES: We consulted Mr. Grant, as far as I know, only on the question you asked us to take up with General Motors and other automobile companies about getting people. He was very helpful and friendly about that. I doubt whether he knows very much. H.M.JR: What I had in mind was to ask him, as a consultant, whether he would look over the whole business, the Victory Fund Committee and the whole business, with an idea of making suggestions as a sales technician. MR. GRAVES: I think he would have to spend a little time with us, then. MR. BELL: It would be grand if he could spend the next two months while this whole program is going on. H.M.JR: What I was thinking, I know he is old, but, for instance, he might say-MR. GRAVES: I am afraid he is not very well. H.M.JR: I know, but if, for instance, he would say, "Could I use a sales manager from the icebox division-+" MR. BUFFINGTON: Frigidaire. H.M.JR: "Could I bring him in? Could I bring in the Delco salesman, people that have nothing to do today? If I could use them, Mr. Morgenthau - or my good friend Jack So-and-so of the Packard Motor Car Company--" He would know these fellows who are in this, and I am going on the theory right along that it takes a certain type of man to make the sale, irrespective of the merchandise. But being a consultant, it wouldn't. disturb anybody. MR. GRAVES: It would be very good. 10 22 - 22 H.M.JR: This is a counter move on my part as against the thought that I must take a New York banker in to direct these sales, which I won't do. I am being very honest with you. Instead of taking a man like different people they have suggested and tried to force on me, well, this would be an answer. "Well, I agree with you that it is good to have outsiders come in and take a look at us, therefore I have asked" there may be a sales managers' organization, I don't know, but I will ask one or two to come in. I do think Mr. Grant, or the sales manager of Packard Motors, or the sales manager of Ford might be able to tell me something. MR. GRAVES: I do, too. H.M.JR: And particularly, for instance, this last suggestion that George Haas made last night about in- stallment payments - I told him to write it out - that we try to get these organizations to take up installment payment of bonds and carry on the same technique, using their organization for that. I mean, you can no longer buy an icebox; get that same group to continue payments on the bonds. MR. GRAVES: We have done something along that line. The General Motors Acceptance Corporation came to us with a great big plan; they wanted to put in that very thing, and Mr. Sloan turned it down. H.M.JR: Which Sloan? MR. GRAVES: The Chairman of General Motors. MR. BELL: This is foreign to the banks. H.M.JR: George is going to write it out and send it in to you. We should, I know, sit down and talk with Eccles. I am pleased with this morning's meeting. MR. BELL: I would like to see that done just with Eccles. The group ought to be here Tuesday or Wednesday. 23 - 23 H.M.JR: I have got Grant coming in at-MR. BELL: Do you want me to talk to Eccles and get his reaction to it, to save your time? H.M.JR: I am free at eleven-thirty. I shouldn't think that that Truman Committee would take over half an hour, would you? MR. BELL: No, I shouldn't think so. H.M.JR: See if you can get Eccles over here at eleven-thirty. MR. BELL: Shouldn't he just come alone? H.M.. JR: Yes. All right. This was a good meeting, don't you think so? Are you satisfied? MR. GRAVES: I am satisfied. MR. BUFFINGTON: Yes. 24 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE November 6, 1942 TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Ferdinand Kuhn, Jr. The following information regarding the LaGuardia story is based, for the most part, on facts supplied by Dick Patterson and his organization in New York. 1. Background. The War Savings Staff in New York has been trying for the past nine months to get the Mayor to install a Payroll Savings Plan for municipal employees. Col. Patterson has talked to the Mayor about it at least three times, and others of his staff have also seen him. The Mayor was always cordial but always gave the excuse about lack of machinery. The Herald Tribune and the Daily News learned of the situation (not from Patterson's organization) and on Tuesday asked Patterson for a statement. Patterson declined to talk, saying that the newspapers should ask the Mayor for comment instead. At the same time Bruce Smith, of the Patterson organization, telephoned Lester Stone, the Mayor's secretary, to tip him off to the fact that the newspapers had the story and that the War Savings Staff had had no part in giving it to them. Stone said he appreciated the tip. The result was the Mayor's statement yesterday which precipitated publication of the story. The Herald Tribune story. The facts attributed to the Treasury Department in this morning's story are correct, except 2. that the number of employees exposed to Payroll Savings in New York State is 4,257,155. Our people have checked the Mayor's statement, and find that in 72 City of New York departments the total sales for September were $444,135 and for August $515,026. This is exclusive of the Board of Education, the Park Department and the Board of Transportation. The Board of Education says that its employees are responsible for sales of about $1,000,000 a month. Our people, in other words, believe the Mayor's figures are fairly accurate. They think, however, that if the Mayor would install a Payroll Savings Plan he would sell at least $30,000,000 a year instead of the $16,000,000 or $17,000,000 he is now selling. 2. 25 3. Tabulating Machinery. Our people in New York and Washington believe the Mayor has made no serious attempt before now to get the machines which he says he needs. It is our contention, as pointed out in the Tribune story, that the City could do much with its present equipment if the Mayor so desired. Controller McGoldrick, who was here yesterday, told Peter Odegard that the Victory Tax would necessitate new accounting machinery, and that this, in turn, would make possible the installation of a Payroll Savings Plan for War Bonds. McGoldrick was pessimistic, however, about the dollar yield to be expected from a Payroll Savings Plan in view of the cost of living, the Victory Tax, and the static salaries of city employees. 4. Public Statement. Col. Patterson and his staff suggest that you make NO public statement on the subject at this time. I agree, since it appears likely that the City will soon install its Payroll Savings Plan at last. F.I. 26 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE TO Ferdinand Kuhn FROM Secretary Morgenthau November 6, 1942 Please read the story in today's Tribune about Mayor LaGuardia in the City of New York and War Bonds. Get all the details from the New York office. Also, there 18 a telegram from Mayor LaGuardia to me which Dan Bell has, ask- ing for help to get him certain office machinery to handle the tax bill next year. I don't know just what the status of that 18. But if New York has taken a fight on with Mayor LaGuardia, I'll have to get in on it sooner or later. I want you to have all the facts for me just as soon as possible and not later than this afternoon, 80 if necessary we can make a public statement. Be sure and get this to me not later than three o'clock this afternoon. 27 Analysis of Exposure to Payroll Savings Plans October 31, 1942 Number exposed Total number savings plans country (estimated) to payroll Percent in the of total exposed Part A - Summary by Number of Organizations Exposed I. Business organizations (1) Firms with 5,000 employees or more (2) Firms with 500 to 4,999 employees (3) Firms with 100 to 499 employees 488 491 99 5,551 24,542 5,905 28,357 94 (4) Subtotal - large firms 30,581 34,753 88 124,038 (6) Total business organizations 154,619 # (5) Firms with less than 100 employees 87 II. Governmental organizations III. Grand total 154,619 Part B - Summary by Number of Employees Exposed I. Business organizations (5) Firms with less than 100 employees 20,779,649 3,064,875 . (4) Subtotal - large firms 7,877,131 7,319,199 5,583,319 * (1) Firms with 5,000 employees or more (2) Firms with 500 to 4,999 employees (3) Firms with 100 to 499 employees 23,844,524 32,800,000 1 73 2,700,000 1 2,800,000 81 (2) State and local government 2,181,131 1,395,423 (3) Total governmental organizations 3,576,554 5,500,000 65 (6) Total business organizations II. Governmental organizations (1) Federal Government III. Grand total Treasury Department 1 27,421,078 50 38,300,000 1 72 November 6, 1942 Excludes agricultural employees, military personnel, employees on WPA or NYA or CCC projects, proprietors, firm members, self-employed, casual workers and persons in domestic service. Data not available. 28 Firms Employing 100 to 499 Persons Participating in Payroll Savings Plans (As reported by the War Savings Staff's State Administrators) Number of firms with payroll Total savings plans : State Apr.18 Oct. 24 number Oct. 31 of firms (estimated) Percent of total having payroll savings plans Apr. 18 Oct. 24 Oct. 31 Alabama 149 251 253 285 52 Arisona 43 68 70 70 61 59 120 37 47 49 707+ 707 ?? 100 100 64 88 88 96 96 Arkansas 44 56 Northern California Southern California 512 707 756 1,036 1,040 1,178 Colorado 113 136 136 141 80 540 544 58 711 39 Connecticut 58 87 24 52 152 152e 199 26 Florida 147 211 214 214 69 Georgia 133 391 391 417 32 31 33 33 33 Idaho Illinois 89 97 100 77 211 21 Delaware District of Columbia 88 692 67 96 99 76 100 94 94 100 100 1,300 1,969 2,022 2,253 58 87 90 Indiana 415 663 663 63 100 100 Iowa 165 207 663 207 305 54 68 68 Kansas 276 136 179 287 210 290 99 99 210 288 75 277 324 85 60 277 173 173* 189 92 92 177 336 339 405 83 84 Massachusetta 639 1,102 1,117 Michigan Minnesota 689 985 991 1,532 1,030 67 376 440 who 441 85 59 86 88 104 83 Missouri 472 676 680 686 99 100 Montana Nebraska 40 49 49 49 82 100 100 103 129 131 139 74 93 94 14 20 28 50 71 89 141 142 145 61 97 463 965 966 966 48 99 100 33 Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Mississippi Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey 287 20* 72 73 96 96 99 988 71 98 41 hi 42 79 98 98 2,060 3,793 3,823 4,257 48 89 90 282 474 563 50 14 471 20 20 20 70 100 100 1,126 1,698 1,731 2,195 52 77 79 Oklahoma 166 298 299 349 48 85 86 Oregon 211 293 293 293 72 100 100 1,682 2,224 2,242 2,242 99 154 270 270 155 155 341 169 92 92 84 100 100 38 37 New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia 71 21 25 25 199 400 405 326 654 36 44 25 522 674 1,378 82 100 100 67 74 80 91 91 59 67 281 400 400 428 66 93 99 100 70 70 Washington 234 352 356 356 134 215 215* 309 43 680 278 473 475 17 23 23 Alaska Railroads Total 78 49 West Virginia Wyoming 100 79 66 Wisconsin 84 2 2a 2 49 49 15,365 321 23 24,542 2 28,357 Treasury Department . Data are for October 24, inasmuch as no October 31 report was received. 100 93 70 70 100 100 100 100 94 94 86 87 November 6, 1942 29 Firms Employing 500 Persons or More Participating in Payroll Savings Plans (As reported by the War Savings Staff's State Administrators) Number of firms with payroll State Alabama savings plans Apr. 18 41 Colorado Connecticut (estimated) 66 14 16 17 18 122 142 142e 149 149 153 121 Percent of total having payroll Apr. 18 savings plans Oct. 24 Oct. 31 69 59 94 96 14 64 100 100 18 89 94 175 100 70 81 81 79 97 97 81 100 100 25 31 31 31 114 152 152 167 68 91 91 18 18 18 83 100 100 Delaware 15 Florida 28 District of Columbia of firms 65 2 Northern California Southern California Oct. 31 14 Arisona Arkansas Oct. 24 Total number 32 45 45* 47 68 96 96 43 43 47 60 91 91 Georgia 86 123 123 123 70 100 100 Illinois 11 11 11 11 100 391 481 100 100 487 560 70 86 88 141 142 87 165 53 85 86 31 31 44 50 70 70 Idaho Indiana Iowa 22 Kansas 23 25 25 Kentucky 38 44 49 92 100 100 78 100 100 51 57 100 100 58# 8* 100 100 100 100 49 Louisiana 29 Maine 48 JAM Maryland 84 109 109 109 77 237 265 315 315 284 338 70 284 Mississippi Missouri 73 92 92 75 100 100 100 100 100 100 32 91 100 100 100 74 99 99 100 100 100 79 94 94 74 97 97 81 81 33 33 33 103 131 131 142 27 27 , New Jersey 100 100 100 79 81 26 23 Nevada New Hampshire 93 100 79 Montana Nebraska 93 100 284 4 27 NO 4 8 4. 4 4 Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota 29 32 32 142 190 191 192 759 898 898 95 103 136 136 140 New Mexico 5 North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon 0 0 o 0 New York 100 - 412 483 484 509 81 95 95 31 51 51 51 61 100 100 48 55 55 55 87 100 100 551 61h 614 652 85 94 94 61 77 77 86 71 90 90 84 98 98 100 84 98 98 Tennessee 100 100 100 50 85 86 92 Texas 54 92 93 63 116 117 118 53 98 99 10 10 10 80 100 100 12 12 12 100 100 100 111 100 South Dakota 5 12 Virginia 5 Utah. Vermont 5 Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Washington 110 111 84 99 49 West Virginia 73 73 73 67 100 100 36 75 75 75 48 100 100 127 150 147 154 1 Alaska 30 3 3 Wisconsin Wyoming 82 95 25 100 100 100 100 100 97 3 Railroads 109 109 109 115 95 95 95 Total 864 6,022 6,039 6,396 76 94 94 Treasury Department . Data are for October 24, inasmuch as no October 31 report was received, November 6, 1942 30 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Ferdinand Kuhn, Jr. November 6, 1942. You asked me to do everything possible to get the story of the October financing into the weekly newspapers, and you asked for a written report. 1. Harold Mager has written an article which the editor of New Republic assures us will definitely appear in next week's issue, leading off with a tribute to your achievement in keeping the interest rate at 2 percent, and supporting your efforts to cut down consumer spending. He wrote this as an independent writer and not as a Treasury consultant. The article was, therefore, not submitted to us before being mailed, but I have seen it and think it will be most useful. Chic Schwarz talked to Keith Hutchison, the financial writer of The Nation, who was much interested in the October financing story and asked for full particulars so that he could write a piece about it. 2. The story of borrowing $6,800,000,000 in one month will not appeal as such to the labor press. The thing to emphasize here is the 2 percent interest rate and its importance to the working men and women of the country. Herman Wolf, labor man with the War Savings Staff, is having an informal meeting with C.I.O. editors at the C.I.O. convention in Boston on Monday, and will discuss this story with them, with the help of material which we are supplying. 3. Mr. Wolf made the excellent suggestion that you have a little press conference of six key labor editors the week after the C.I.O. convention, on November 16th or subsequent days. Herbert Gaston, Randolph Paul and the rest of our publicity group agree that this is highly desirable. If you would set a date for such a meeting, we can get out preliminary material to the six people, with emphasis on the 2 percent interest rate. F.K. 31 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE November 6, 1942 Secretary Morgenthau TO FROM Mr. Haas Subject: Recent Changes in Prices and Yields of Government Securities During the week ended last night, there was little showing no change. The restricted 2-1/2's of 1962-67 improved 3/32 during the week, the largest move registered by any issue, to close last night at 100-12/32 bid, movement in the prices of Government securities, most issues 100-18/32 asked, a mean of 100-15/32*. The taxable 2-1/2's of 1967-72 closed yesterday at 101, down 1/32 from a week ago, while the taxable 1-1/2 percent notes, due in December 1946, remained unchanged at 100-1/32. Of the 46 securities listed in Table II, which were outstanding on March 19, 22 have higher yields now than in March, 4 have the same yields, and 20 have lower yields. Only 6 of the 46 securities, however, have higher prices now than in March. The difference is due to the amortization factor previously discussed in a number of memoranda of this series. (See attached chart and tables.) Certificates of indebtedness showed some improvement during the week, the new 7/8 percent issue due November 1943 closing last night at 100.066 to yield 0.81 percent as compared with a yield of 0.84 percent a week ago. For the fourth successive week, the average rate on the weekly offering of bills was 0.373 percent. Purchases by the Federal Reserve Banks for their individual investment accounts and for the System Account aggregated $456 millions during the week ended last night. They consisted of $192 millions of bills, $216 millions of certificates, $32 millions of taxable notes and bonds, and $16 millions of partially tax-exempt issues. Sales, confined * All quotations in this memorandum and the accompanying tables, unless otherwise specified, are mean of closing bid and asked quotations. 32 Secretary Morgenthau - 2 entirely to bills, amounted to $127 millions. Maturities included $124 millions of bills and $287 millions of certificates, $158 millions of which were exchanged for the new certificates. (Federal had tendered the entire amount but was allotted only $158 millions.) As a result of these transactions total Federal Reserve holdings of Government securities decreased $82 millions during the week. The condition statement of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks, released today, shows an increase of $110 millions in the Federal Reserve portfolio during the week ended on Wednesday. The difference between this and the figure just quoted is due to the fact that the data used in this memorandum are for a week ended on Thursday rather than on Wednesday, and are on a "transaction date" basis rather than on a "delivery date" basis. The combined effect of these two differences is to make the figures cited in this memorandum about two days more up-to-date than those used in the condition statement. Attachments Table I 33 Price and Yield Changes of United States Securities October 29, 1942 to November 5, 1942 (Based on mean of closing bid and asked quotations) Yields Prices Security Oct. 29, 1942 Nov. 5, 1942 Change Oct. 29, 1942 Nov. 5, 1942 Change (Percent) (Decimals are thirty-seconds) 1 TAXABLE SECURITIES 7/8 Taxable Notes 3/15/46 12/15/46 1-1/2 Taxable Bonds 3/15/48-50 6/15/49-51 9/15/49-51 2 2 2-1/2 2-1/4 2-1/2 2-1/2 2-1/2 12/15/49-51 3/15/50-52 12/15/51-55 3/15/52-54 6/15/52-55 3/15/56-58 6/15/62-67 9/15/67-72 .37 .00 +.009 43 .37 +.014 .63 .60 -.06 -.03 +.002 +.031 .72 .72 .00 .84wi .81 -.03 - Certificates .37 - Average rate last issue - Bills 100.051 100.012 100.115 100.035w1 100.026 100.117 100.066 100.03 99.21 100.00 98.30 99.05 100.01 100.03 99.21 100.01 98.30 99.05 100.01 101.05 100.11 100.07 100.05 100.01 100.01 103.24 101.08 103.09 100.12 101.01 100.060 .00 .50 .94 49 .94 -.01 .00 +.01 1.25 1.24 -.01 .00 .00 1.10 1.10 1.26 .00 1.26 .00 1.49 1.49 .00 101.06 100.11 100.08 100.05 +.01 1.77 .00 1.94 1.77 1.94 .00 +.01 1.97 1.98 1.96 -.01 1.98 .00 100.02 100.01 103.24 101.08 103.09 100.15 101.00 +.01 .00 2.00 -.01 2.00 1.99 2.00 .00 2.06 2.06 .00 2.11 2.22 2.48 2.11 2.21 2.47 -.01 -.01 2.44 2.45 +.01 .00 .00 +.03 -.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TAX-EXEMPT SECURITIES Wholly Tax-exempt Notes 12/15/42 1-1/8 6/15/43 9/15/43 1-1/8 3/4 12/15/43 3/15/44 6/15/44 9/15/44 3/15/45 Partially Tax-exempt Bonda 6/15/43-47 3-1/8 2-3/4 2-1/2 3-1/8 2-1/2 2-1/2 2-3/4 2-1/4 10/15/43-45 4/15/44-46 12/15/44-54 9/15/45-47 12/15/45 3/15/46-56 6/15/46-48 6/15/46-49 10/15/47-52 12/15/47 3/15/48-51 9/15/48 12/15/48-50 12/15/49-52 12/15/49-53 9/15/50-52 6/15/51-54 9/15/51-5 12/15/51-53 2 2-1/4 2-7/8 2-3/4 2-3/4 2-3/4 6/15/54-56 3/15/55-60 9/15/56-59 6/15/58-63 12/15/60-65 -.01 26 .28 +.02 .00 .00 .00 .37 .35 .32 .32 100.23 100.13 100.30 100.13 .00 .48 .31 .30 .47 -.02 -.01 -.02 -.01 .00 .00 .50 .50 .50 .49 -.01 .00 .58 .58 .00 101.24 102.16 103.20 106.15 104.31 104.19 -.02 108.27 .00 100.06 100.15 100.19 100.29 100.23 100.13 100.30 100.13 100.05 101.26 102.16 103.20 106.16 105.00 104.19 108.27 106.26 107.06 114.16 104.04 107.15 106.30 104.05 110.18 106.04 106.15 108.04 110.09 104.28 103.14 105.08 109.19 108.28 109.00 109.19 100.15 100.19 100.29 106.25 107.06 114.15 104.06 107.15 106.30 104.06 110.18 106.04 106.15 108.04 110.09 104.28 103.14 105.08 109.18 108.28 109.00 109.18 Treasury Department, Division of Research and Statistics. Decimals in prices of certificates are true decimals. .00 47 .48 +.01 .00 .63 .58 .00 .75 -.01 -.01 .71 .89 -.05 -.04 -.02 .98 .98 .00 1.00 .99 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.08 1.09 1.22 1.15 1.30 -.01 -.02 -.01 -.01 -.02 -.01 .00 -.01 .00 -.01 +.02 .00 .00 +.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 -.01 .00 .00 -.01 .91 1.10 1.23 1.17 1.31 1.27 1.29 1.55 1.59 1.62 1.73 1.74 1.67 1.65 1.75 2.00 2.01 2.07 2.11 .00 1.27 .00 1.29 1.55 1.59 1.62 .00 .00 1.73 .00 .00 .00 1.74 .00 1.67 .00 1.65 1.75 2.00 2.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.07 .00 .00 2.11 November 5, 1942. 1 Table II 34 Price and Yield Changes of United States Securities March 19, 1942 to November 5, 1942 (Based on mean of closing bid and asked quotations) Yields Prices Security March 19, 1942 Nov. 5, 1942 (Decimals are thirty -seconds Change March 19, 1942 1/ Nov. 5, 1942 (Percent) Change TAXABLE SECURITIES .49 +.12 +.18 1.24 1.83 .84 1.67 - - - 100.15 - +.02 +.04 +.24 1.77 1.94 +.11 +.10 1.96 1.98 1.99 2.00 2.06 1.96 2.09 2.12 2.24 -2.11 2.21 2.46 2.47 2.45 - +.05 +.26 1.10 1.26 1.49 - - -.22 -.25 +.01 - .94 1.02 -.11 - - .37 -.23 -.24 - .37 .60 .72 .81 .76 - 101.00 -.09 -.10 - - 6/15/52-55 3/15/56-58 6/15/62-67 9/15/67-72 - - - 2 2 2 2-1/4 2-1/2 2-1/2 2-1/2 52-54 - - - - 12/15/51-55 - 100.27 50-52 - - - - 100.12 103.23 101.06 103.05 12/15/49-51 - 6/15/49-51 9/15/49-51 101.06 100.11 100.08 100.05 100.02 100.01 103.24 101.08 103.09 101.28 101.04 - 99.21 99.29 1-1/2 12/15/46 xable Bonds 2-1/2 100.03 99.21 100.01 98.30 99.05 100.01 100.12 99.31 12/15/45 3/15/46 100.026 100.117 100.066 +.17 - 100.060 .37 - 7/8 xable Notes .20 - - - - Average rate last issue - ills +.04 -.03 -.01 -.03 -.01 TAX-EXEMPT SECURITIES holly Tax-exempt Notes 1-1/8 1-1/8 9/15/44 3/15/45 Tax-exempt Bonds 101.11 101.04 101.03 101.16 101.10 100.27 101.16 101.00 103.21 2-3/4 4/15/44-46 12/15/44-54 9/15/45-47 12/15/45 3/15/46-56 46-48 46-49 47-52 47 48-51 104.06 105.06 108.11 106.06 105.28 110.08 107.28 108.08 115.20 104.23 107.28 48 107.07 48-50 49-52 104.21 110.22 106.16 106.20 108.18 110.20 51-54 104.29 56-59 60-65 103.10 104.28 110.00 109.10 109.12 110.00 100.05 100.15 100.19 100.29 100.23 100.13 100.30 100.13 101.24 102.16 103.20 106.15 104.31 104.19 108.27 106.25 107.06 114.15 104.06 107.15 106.30 104.06 110.18 106.04 106.15 108.04 110.09 104.28 103.14 105.08 109.18 108.28 109.00 109.18 ment, Division of Research and Statistics. prices of certificates are true decimals. rice over zero yield. -3/32* -1.06 -.21 -.16 -.19 -.19 -.14 -,18 -.19 2/32* .28 .22 .35 +.13 .26 31 +.05 -1.29 -1.22 -1.18 -1.28 -1.07 -1.09 -1.13 -1.03 -1.02 -1.05 -.17 -.13 -.09 -.15 -.04 -.12 -.05 -.14 -.11 -.01 +.04 +.12 -.14 -.14 -.12 -.14 .26 .30 +.04 .34 .47 .37 .50 .39 .41 .49 +.13 +.13 +.10 .58 +.17 .41 .48 +.07 .57 +.01 .72 .58 .71 .91 .89 .94 .98 .99 .90 1.11 1.09 1.13 1.33 1.15 1.38 1.33 1.28 1.65 1.60 1.66 1.74 1.78 1.70 1.68 1.80 2.00 1.06 1.08 1.09 1.22 1.15 1.30 1.27 1.29 1.55 1.59 1.62 1.73 1.74 1.67 1.65 1.75 2.00 -.01 -.02 +.04 +.09 -.05 -.01 -.04 -.11 .00 -.08 -.06 +.01 -.10 -.01 -.04 -.01 -.04 -.03 -.03 -.05 2.01 2.07 2.01 2.07 .00 .00 .00 2.10 2.11 +.01 November 5, 1942. 35 November 6, 1942 11:00 a.m. AMERICAN VISCOSE COMPANY Present: Mr. Bell Mr. White Mr. Cairns Mr. Fulton Mrs. Klotz H.M.JR: You ask me the questions, and then I will answer to the best of my ability. MR. FULTON: I might first give you a short thumbnail sketch of the extent of the interest that Senator Truman had expressed in it. Last year at the time of the sale he was aware of the fact that there were at least contentions that the bankers had made a very large profit, and Mr. Jesse Jones had discussed with him the possibility of putting up a loan which would be collateralized or secured. H.M.JR: Mr. Jones had? MR. FULTON: Yes, with British-held American securities, the basis being that perhaps the bankers were somewhat avaricious in the amounts which they had made on this particular transaction. Senator Truman's interest was not so deep that he went into it beyond understanding that there had been provision made for such a loan by, I think, the RFC. Recently - that is, within the last few months - a rather prominent banker, who requested that his name not be mentioned, said that he thought that a very great deal of damage had been done by the relatively high amounts paid by the American bankers in this 36 -2particular transaction. Senator Truman, therefore, wanted to find out, not the amount of the banking profit, but the justification underlying the amounts which they had. He had somewhat this idea in mind, that a loan secured by British securities is really a paper transaction until and unless the British ultimately sell the securities in this country and repay the loan or obtain dollar exchange from some other source. He thought that your initial idea, perhaps - or what he thought was your idea - of having an orderly disposition on fair terms of large blocks of British securities would have been preferable, in the sense that when they were so disposed of the dollar exchange could have been applied to the war effort. In the loan transaction, involving such huge sums as it does, it might after the war become a question of discussions between the governments as to the disposition of the loan, and that might ultimately be much less satisfactory from the American standpoint than the proposal which he thought you had had in mind of disposing of the securities. It, therefore, is not so much a question of criticizing at this late date the exact amount of profit obtained by the bankers, although some of the Senators might be inclined to do that - and as to that we have taken no position to date - but it was more nearly the thought of whether it is not possible to have something somewhat more satisfactory. Could not the bankers, for example, make proposals as to the methods of dealing? I don't mean necessarily the syndicate involved here, but I mean the banking groups in the country as a whole, could they not make an orderly sale of substantial blocks on terms that would be far better to the -British than the terms in the American Viscose and which would yet produce for us exchange that could then be applied to the RFC loan? H.M.JR: As I get it, this present question in the Senator's mind was raised by a banker. Is that right? 37 -3MR. FULTON: That is correct. H.M.JR: And do I also understand correctly that originally when the thing went through, Mr. Jones went to Senator Truman about it? MR. FULTON: No, I think that Senator Truman had asked Mr. Jones about it, but that Mr. Jones had expressed to him the opinion that the amount was rather large, that is, the amount of the bankers' profit. H.M.JR: Well now, this is what I have, from memory and reading the thing up. We have got to go back to the first Lend-Lease, you see. At that time when I went up there it was new and difficult, and so forth, and we were not in the war, and a lot of people did not want us to get in the war. I made the statement that the British would sell all of their assets in this country; they would put them all on the table for me against contracts that they had already outstanding in this country for munitions. I assured the Senators that the British would do this in good faith. I stated the amount, which, as I remember, was over a billion dollars, wasn't it? MR. BELL: A billion four, I think. H.M.JR: What I am saying now is for you and the Senator only. If he wants to use it, I would like to talk with him. I had the damndest time to get the British to sell anything. They fussed around, and this was wrong and that was wrong, and so forth, and so on. I finally more or less gave them an ultimatum and said to them, "You have got to sell something in order to show the Congress of the United States that when I said that your securities were on the table as a pledge, you meant it, as a matter of good faith and relationship between the two countries. I don't care what you sell or how you sell it." Well, they said, "The market is bad." It was bad. I said, "You have got to sell something." Then they picked J.P. Morgan, and I told them that that 38 -4 was a great mistake. Right or wrong the present generation of Morgans made great moneys out of the last war - excess profits, and 80 forth, and so on. It was a bad mistake. Whereupon they said that the two representatives of the Treasury that they had met had told them Morgan was all right, and they thought they were speaking for me, which they weren't. Well, it finally got so bad that I had to give them a week's ultimatum. I said, "You have got exactly a week in which to do this," and they went ahead and rushed the thing through and made the arrangements with Morgan and Dillon, Read. After I learned what the commission was, I was very much shocked and told them that this was entirely too much - the price I mean the commission - and again for better feeling I said, "Some day this is going to come out; some day this is going to be investigated," and I said, "You are doing yourself and the banking fraternity a great injury, and you ought to take considerable less. They wrote off - took a million less, and then I begged them to knock off another million. Dillon, Read and Morgan agreed to it, but they said that their other twenty-eight or twenty-seven partners said it was too late, they would not agree to it. They were willing, Morgan and Dillon, Read. MR. BELL: The other members of the syndicate weren't. MR. FULTON: You see, I have had the advantage of talking with the Dort firm, representing Dillon, Read, with whom I am very close by reason of my past contacts. What you have said tallies almost exactly with what they have said. They stated that they had no knowledge of the transaction until almost the time that they were required to do it. I believe that in this letter, which I received on the 4th of November from Morgan Stanley, they stated that they had only four days, and that with that very limited amount of time and with what they regarded anyhow as the unsatisfactory knowledge of facts underlying 39 5- the company, by reason of not having had their own auditors and their own check, also by people whom they would trust the judgment of as to the future of the industry and the company, that they could not make an offer which would have been anywhere near as good as an offer which would have had more time. As a result, they, in effect, I think I can fairly say, admitted that the amount paid - that is, the original thirty-six or thirty-seven million - was regarded by them as the equivalent of a fully secured loan. Then the actual sale price would be determined. That is, the actual purchase price by them to the British would be determined by the sale price obtained by them in selling the securities. That being so, the ten percent which they originally arranged to receive of the excess of the sale price would seem to have been, as you say, a very generous commission on their part. And yet they cite the fact that they had to tie up a very considerable portion of their capital for a period of at least two months, and possibly longer, and that although it would be in all like lihood fully secured, it would not have been within the normal business of those firms to make loans of that character for so long a time. H.M.JR: That refreshes my memory, but that is correct. They say normally their own capital is really never involved. Now, we submitted the thing at the time to the SEC and the SEC said that the charges that they made were normal practice for banking houses in Wall Street. I mean that that would be the normal fee, you see. MR, FULTON: I don't quite understand that. I am thinking from the standpoint of what little knowledge I have in the past. H.M.JR: Am I right in that? MR. WHITE: Quite right. They thought it was a little bit on the up side. 40 -6 MR. CAIRNS: It was not unusual. H.M.JR: That was what the SEC told me. I have never been in this business, you see. MR. FULTON: Are there other transactions? 1 have never myself known of one where a purchase was made with the idea of selling at a higher price and basing your commission on the sliding scale that they have there. Are there other transactions similar to this? MR. BELL: They were talking about the amount, weren't they? MR. WHITE: That was the report made at the time by the man who was in charge at SEC. You had asked him to look into it for the very reason that you just suggested, and that was his reply. He talked it over with some of the other members of the Commission, and he said, "It is a little high. It is on the up side, but that is not unusual practice in the Street." MR. FULTON: I think I would probably tend to agree with that as to the amount of the underwriting commission as figured on the total sales price as it ultimately turned out, and not being out of line percentage-wise, although perhaps being out of line dollar-wise because of the magnitude of the transaction. Our problem was not so much to determine whether per- centage-wise it was out of line as whether the formula under which the matter was contracted by the bankers was not unduly favorable to them. H.M.JR: Well, I thought it was juicy. After they cut off the first million, against the advice of my associates I got them in the room here alone and begged them to knock off another million. To give Morgan, Stanley and Dillon, Read credit, they tried to make the effort. They said, "So far as we are concerned we are willing to do it, but we couldn't get the other syndicate members to agree." MR. FULTON: That is my understanding. 41 -7H.M.JR: Now, just to go on a minute, there are lots of by-products. If you want to go into it fully, all right, but a lot of things happened. There were a lot of forces which were trying to keep me from doing, this. If the committee wants it, all right; but I don t know how far they want to go. That is the price story. I told this as to the amount they were getting. I said that even if they were getting ten or fifteen million dollars less - now we are forgetting the bankers the British Treasury - than the thing is worth, the matter of the good faith of the British Government is at stake. I said, "What the hell is ten or fifteen million dollars as compared to my saying that all of your securities would be put up against a billion four hundred million contracts which you have outstanding?" When the deal was finished, Sir Edward Peacock said, "I am satisfied, and Lord Halifax said, "I am satisfied for the British Government." He said, "We are satisfied." glad we did it; it was the right thing to do; we are MR. FULTON: Our problem was not so much-- H.M.JR: There are two factors in this thing: One, the price that they obtained, and then the profit that the bankers got. I don't know how far you want to go into it, but as far as my part in the profit thing - I have told you the thing roughly. I have got the details, a record, if you want them. My books are open. it. MR. FULTON: Yes, I understand that, and I appreciate Now, with respect to the price obtained for the British - of course, the disparity between the amount which the Courtauld Company obtained in pounds from the British makes a rather great contrast. There was a discussion between myself and the attorneys for Dillon, Read as to whether they were sure that they had obtained 42 -8the highest price possible in dollars here, to which they replied that they probably had obtained the highest price consistent with their ideas as to how the company should properly be financed; that is, with a very large amount of the financing of the common stock, and only a small part preferred stock, and no bonded indebtedness. They thought that they had made an offering of bonds as distinct from preferred stock. They could have obtained more in dollars, but would have had a less sound enterprise, for which they might have to explain themselves to their own security holders and customers at a later time. That was also somewhat complicated by the possible offer which arose at the time from other minority stockholders who were afraid that although their stock was not involved in the transaction, the transaction would, in effect, fix the price or value of their securities for a long time to come. The real damage is the one, I think, that you referred to and is more nearly the one that the committee was interested in, and that is that by not getting as low a profit to the bankers and as high a price as possible, you, in effect, find yourself in the position where the British are reluctant to sell their securities as distinct from pledging. H.M.JR: No. MR. WHITE: No. H.M.JR: No, no. What happened after that was they went ahead and sold a lot of securities on the market and sold them by this new method that they have of selling after the stock exchange closes, you know. MR. FULTON: Some, I understand, have been sold by Morgan Stanley and Dillon, Read - relatively small. H.M.JR: They spread it all around. MR. BELL: They sold big blocks. 43 - -9 - H.M.JR: And this particular thing had no effect on their continuing to sell just as long as the market would absorb, up to the time that it was decided that what was a residue would be put up as pledges, and they got a four-hundred-million-dollar loan from the RFC on the whole block. MR. FULTON: With respect to that, would it be your opinion that it would be possible to liquidate or, if possible, desirable? H.M.JR: What is happening on that? MR. WHITE: The British have, and did have very early, a considerable reluctance to part with certain types of securities. They didn't mind parting with the securities of very large companies, and they did as they went along, but things like Viscose and others which they now have they never displayed any eagerness to part with. They parted with Viscose with great reluctance, irrespective of the price they would have gotten for it, and, I think they would be most reluctant to be forced to sell what they have now. They would much prefer to have the present arrangement, possibly for the very reason that you suggested earlier. I noticed an editorial just last week in the British papers in which for the first time, to my knowledge, they raised the question of equal sacrifices by various governments in line with the Atlantic Charter and that maybe they ought to get their earning assets back, their securities back. H.M.JR: Then you saw where they asked me about some admiral or general in this country, English, who said, "Can you put a dollar value on Lend-Lease and compare it with blood, the loss of life, and so forth?" But I don't think - I am confident that the people in responsible positions who have anything to do with this deal realized the wisdom of getting it through. It was to demonstrate that they would keep good faith. It was terribly important at that time. 44 - 10 MR. FULTON: I don't think that Senator Truman has ever questioned that. H.M.JR: Lord Halifax and Sir Edward Peacock assured me when the thing was over that they were satisfied. That closed that. Now, there were people in England - people in this country who wanted to get hold of Viscose for monopolistic reasons. They would like to get it tie it up with other yarn concerns, and so forth, and so on. I, frankly, forced the sale through. I had to do it. I mean, here I was, the Secretary of the Treasury, saying that the British were going to meet their contracts through money that they were going to realize through the sale of American securities owned by British citizens; and they just had to go through with it. MR. WHITE: You forced the sale, but it is not the same; they selected the security. All you insisted on, you remember, was that they sell something. H.M.JR: I said "sale," and I finally gave them a week. As I said, these people - they had four days. If I had to do the thing over from the beginning, I would do it just the same, and then try to get just as much out of it for them. I put all the pressure that I could, way beyond what my associates thought I should, to get the bankers to cut down their profits. Now, as far as getting dollar exchange and all that thing, the thing now is going ahead in a fairly orderly manner. I don't think that, as far as I can tell, this particular sale has subsequently influenced what they did. They realized the political necessity. MR. FULTON: Yes. On the balance of the securities, the residue, do you believe that it might not become the subject of Government discussions as to the cancellation of the four hundred odd million dollar loan of a later date? 45 - 11 H.M.JR: Well, I am not up to date. We had some word from Jones before I went to England. What is the last word on that? Do either of you know? Have they sold any of those? MR. WHITE: Very little. MR. BELL: They sold some. MR. WHITE: Most of it is unsold. They have taken, I think, all except possibly ten million dollars. There is no question yet, to my knowledge, of any prospect of immediate liquidation in order to repay the loan. MR. FULTON: I see. Of course, there is always that worry, the argument you mentioned, that they raised, about it being a subject of discussion which might come at an embarrassing time from the Government standpoint. The British, in effect, might request a return of the securities without making payment therefor, or if they did make payment therefor by that amount, reducing their ability and their willingness to make some other payment which this Government might have in mind at the time. H.M.JR: Well, the securities are fully pledged. MR. FULTON: Yes, but it still would require either that they be sold or that they obtain dollar exchange elsewhere. to. H.M.JR: Jones could sell them any time he wanted MR. FULTON: He has that right under the agreement despite the payment of interest? MR. WHITE: I think there is a date within which they can pay him back the money. I am not positive of 46 - 12 - the agreement. I can try to find out. I think they have to default, but I am not positive about the exact terms. MR. FULTON: That, I think, gives us the basic background, except that if you could say anything with respect to whether you have a position or might have a position as to whether the securities should be continued to be liquidated or should be held as a block subject to a loan. H.M.JR: My off-hand opinion, without having talked it over - I sort of feel that this is one of the many things that will be settled around the peace table. I really haven't thought about it. It is one of those sleeping dogs. You see, right now the British Treasury dollar position is good. They can see daylight for another six months or a year, which, if any treasury can see that, is good as far as dollar exchange is concerned. So, this is one of a dozen factors which goes into their dollar position, production of gold, Canada, South Africa, the various expenses that they have, and so forth, and so on. So I mean, it is one of at least a dozen factors. When we were over recently this whole question didn't come up, because for the moment they are comfortable. But certainly to answer this, I would resist to the last ditch a repetition of the contract similar to the one that was entered into before because it was unnecessary. They can sell that. I don't know the exact technique, but there is a way of selling after the exchange closes. There is some disposition - I don't know - a half a point, or whatever it is. 47 - 13 MR. FULTON: That was explained to me. I think it isn't much in excess of that. H.M.JR: There would be no excuse for another con- tract similar to the other one. MR. FULTON: That would be, I think, the committee's position, and it would be very much opposed to that. If the thing, however, that was holding up the liquidation was the fear, on the part of the British, that they were either not obtaining the correct price, or being forced to pay too large a commission, then the committee would like to see some arrangements, if possible, worked out for an orderly liquidation at a much more advantageous price to the British, and at a commission which no one could say was not low enough. H.M.JR: You could quote me and say that I am in entire sympathy with that position. I am sure that the British don't have to enter into another contract of that kind. I mean, there is absolutely no reason for them to enter into one like that, and certainly they wouldn't if I could possibly prevent them from doing it. I would prevent them if I could. Let me just read this. (Letter dated Oct. 1, 1942, from Mr. Jesse H. Jones and letter dated Oct. 8, to Mr. Jones, read by the Secretary, copies attached.) H.M.JR: That is the last word. MR. FULTON: Do you know the approximate amount of the dollar value, as value for security purposes, of the collateral held by Mr. Jones? H.M.JR: No, but that could be ascertained. MR. FULTON: I should think from the statement that it so largely exceeded in its income the interest, it would be indicative it is probably twice or more the value - I mean the amount of the loan. H.M.JR: If the committee wanted it, we would be glad to furnish them with that information. 48 - 14 MR. FULTON: Our question would partly relate to that of whether the British had fully carried through and if, for example, you had upward of eight hundred million in value of securities against what is only three hundred and ninety million loans, and therefore used, there would remain some four hundred million of securities which in effect would be left to the British entirely free and never used by them for the purpose of bearing their share. H.M.JR: If the committee decides they want it, you can get it either from Mr. Jones or from us; either way. MR. FULTON: I think they world like to have it, but we can get that from Mr. Jones. Then one other question in a somewhat similar field, but a wholly different point, would be the foreign securities of, say, South American countries and others held by the British. What, if anything, has been done by them with respect to those? H.M.JR: Nothing, as far as we are concerned, because when we started in a couple of years ago they were practically worthless. I mean the securities which they held largely in Argentine and Brazil were estimated at several billion dollars, but then the thing was to try to get it, and most of the things weren't worth ten cents on the dollar. And then, even if you could have sold, all these countries blocked their funds and the British could not get the money out. So if they had been successful in disposing of them and gotten Argentine and Brazilian currency for them, they could not get the money out, and as far as I know, unless something has happened recently, I don't think they have done anything about it. Do you know, Harry? MR. WHITE: There have been some negotiations between the various countries and the British Government in an attempt to buy back the securities, particularly the Government securities - public utilities which 49 - 15 England holds, in exchange for the block sterling which these countries have. Those negotiations have been going on for over a year, and they make a little prog- ress. There has been some exchange, but not very much. MR. FULTON: That whole subject is one on which the committee has not gone far enough to have an opinion other than the one that it should be explored by the vari- ous Governmental authorities, both from the standpoint of exchange, which would be, as I say, a very difficult problem, and from the standpoint of American equity and perhaps influencing South American countries. H.M.JR: I had this up with Nelson Rockefeller. He had his people go into the whole thing, and when they looked into the whole thing they decided they could not do anything about it. We gave all the facts, very carefully prepared, turned them all over to Nelson Rockefeller, and they spent about ten months on it, or something. They went into the thing exhaustively and when they got through they said that as far as they were concerned they did not want to touch it. But that has been done. MR. FULTON: And then with respect to the Britishheld securities of Canadian companies, has anything been done on that? H.M.JR: Not as far as we are concerned. Their relations with Canada - they advise us of the thing, but of course that is a separate thing. But when I went into this Lend-Lease thing I made them put everything on the table, you see, and there were some people that thought we should have been very much tougher than we were. After all, when you go back to those days there were some people that didn't know whether the English could stand out, or wanted to stand out; and there was such a thing as trying to get blood out of a turnip. MR. FULTON: Of course, they had to be allowed an incentive at least to continue in the war effort. H.M.JR: We are just talking here - the business 50 - 16 groups in those days in England were very powerful Chamberlain and his people, that represented big business - and you had to watch your step not to crowd them too much or else they might have quit fighting; they might have said, "What the hell are we fighting for? America is going to take all of our assets and expect us to shed the blood, and they won't even get in the war." I mean, you have got to throw yourself back two years. MR. FULTON: That is true, and yet I might say that some of the Senators, particularly those who went on the Alaskan trip recently, were somewhat disturbed when they asked me to inquire as to the position which the American Government and private industry would have with respect to, say, the Alaskan road and the air fields along the road; and when I informed them that although we had obtained an agreement for the use of the road for the purpose of shipping, duty free, materials from the United States to Alaska through Canada, we had not obtai ned any such rights with respect to the use of the fields themselves, although those fields, in part, were built with American money. It is somewhat disturbing. I am merely talking out loud along the lines I know the Senators feel. It is somewhat disturbing to them to think that an air route which might be of such vital = importance after the war as a trade route to Russia and even to the Far East generally, is one on which we have not taken precautions of obtaining now a clear concept and understanding of what our rights will be as to the use of the fields. Similarly, they are somewhat interested in the same questions with respect to the bases that we have spent money developing, and general questions of trade which may come up after the war, although they are not pressing those things to any immediate conclusion, and although they also are fully appreciative of the point that England must have a definite incentive to fight something to fight for and to have when they are through. But they would like to have it determined on some fair basis, fair to both the English and the Americans, so that it would not be a subject that might simply result in a stalemate for some years after the war to the positive detriment of both parties. 51 - 17 - H.M.JR: Well, I have tried with all my might and main to carry out the difficult function of keeping all these United Nations solvent, getting them to live up to their contracts, like Russia. There was a day when Russia could not meet its obligations and we ad- vanced them thirty or thirty-five million dollars against future shipments of gold. They had to have the money. I am glad to say that they have paid back every dollar of it under the most trying conditions. Only recently they paid off, didn't they? MR. BELL: Yes. H.M.JR: They sent it across Siberia and everything else. One big shipment was lost in a convoy coming back from Murmansk, but they didn't whimper about it; they paid us back. I am just illustrating that we are tough where it is a question of being tough, but we don't want to press these people so that they are going to throw up their hands and say, "Well, maybe we had better do business with Germany, anyway. We can keep our investments and international trade," and so forth and 80 on. We are not oft-headed or soft-hearted, but there is a happy medium which we like to think we follow; and that is we are looking after American interests as well as we can without jeopardizing the war effort. MR. FULTON: So far as I am able to speak for Senator Truman, I know that he has the same view, his only view being that on many of these problems it might be best now to reach solutions fair to both sides, which after the war would constitute a very difficult problem, possibly to the injury of both sides. H.M.JR I think he is very sound on that. MR. FULTON: I appreciate greatly the time you have taken. H.M.JR: No, it is important, and if you have some thoughts or some doubts after you get back, come and see me. 52 - 18 MR. FULTON: All right. Thank you very much. H.M.JR: You may say, "Well, gosh, we didn't quite clear up that point." If there is any doubt in your mind, come on back, for I have great respect for the committee and what you people have done, and I like to think I am among the original ones who said, "Take the profit out of war." I don't want anybody to make a red cent out of this war if I can help it. MR. FULTON: Within, of course, the limits that are necessary to keep the organization going. H.M.JR: Sure. You remember a year ago last November I said six percent on your money was a reasonable amount. From coast to coast I was pounced on by all the newspapers; now they think six percent is a little high. But I meant, a man should have a fair return on his capital but nothing over and above that, and we have done everything along those lines here in the Treasury to do that. There are lots of things. For instance, a thing which I never would have done is, I never would have left it to the business man to decide, when the thing is over, whether the plant, which is fully financed by the Government, continues or whether he shuts it down. We advanced all the money for what the English call the shadow factories - these new plants. MR. FULTON: Which are not very shadowy. H.M.JR: Not shadowy - very substantial. And then we let the company decide what they are going to do with them; if they had left it with me, I would have left the option with the Government. Now there are a lot of things like that which I don't like at all. MR. FULTON: I understand the committee has not liked the option to be in a fixed dollar sum which, by reason of possible changes in the value of the dollar, might result in a bad transaction for the Government. 53 - 19 - H.M.JR: But the decision rests with the company. MR. FULTON: And the option is fixed, firm, both of which are somewhat questionable. H.M.JR: But there are a lot of things like that. If we could have written the contracts, the option would have been much more favorable to the Government. This way it is all one way. We put up all the money, let them write the plant off during the war, and then when the thing is over, if it is to our interest to keep an armament plant going and Bethlehem Steel says, no, that they want to shut down, they shut it down. MR. FULTON: True. And we also have a problem, if we can speak a minute, briefly, which has worried a number of Senators. There has been so large a dislocation of what you might term pre-war industry, by reason of the building of these plants, the equipping of them with machine tools and the labor which has been induced to leave its former occupations, and even the housing for that labor, that we will, after the war, find that it will be practically impossible to get back to the other status. If it was difficult to convert with an unlimited purchasing, it will be much more difficult to convert back to a state where there is no purchaser and where, with respect to these new plants at least, there is no former commerce or trade. That is, they have never made an article that would be usable in trade and have not sal esmen or customers, so that the fear is rather natural - it would be tremendous. H.M.JR: Are you familiar with what they do in England? MR. FULTON: Not fully, no. 54 - 20 - H.M.JR: You check me, Harry, but this is what they do in England. They build what they call a shadow factory - they did it before - the Government owns it, and they equip it fully. And then we saw one factory that I think was employing somewhere around twenty-seven thousand people making airplane engines. They go to an automobile company and say, "We want you to manage this and supervise twenty-seven thousand people. This company has got a hundred thousand dollar fee, and that is all - a hundred thousand dollars to do twentyseven thousand. That is what they did, and this fellow took us through. He was the head of one of the big auto- mobile companies, just as proud as Punch, and believe me, I don't care where you go in the United States, you could not see a better run factory than this Bristol Airplane engine plant, or see the stuff come out any faster. I had a General Motors man in here and another man on war bonds, and I asked about it. "Aren't they doing just as well there, today, as we?" He says, "Yes. He says, "We thought we knew it all" - and a hundred thousand to supervise a factory of that size. When the thing is over the tools belong to the Government, the factory belongs to the Government, and whatever they want to make is wholly within their province. MR. FULTON: That, of course, cannot be compared with our situation. Our fees are so much higher. H.M.JR: And they are getting the production. We went to a Spitfire factory where, when they ended every day at six o'clock, so many Spitfires came out; you could see them there at five o'clock. They had the same arrange- ment at Vickers Arms - the same except, as I remember, that Vickers Arms took nothing; as I remember, they told me they had out-of-pocket expenses, but no fee. They did not want any fee; they just took out-of-pocket expenses for a certain amount of the management. Here was the thing - a big factory - I think they are way ahead of us. MR. FULTON: I certainly won't quarrel with that. 55 - 21 - H.M.JR: And the answer is, they are getting the production. They can't say that they are having labor trouble, or this or that trouble. The place runs just as sweet, and people are happy, and the stuff rolls out at the other end of the line. And when it is over, well, at least the Government has got the stuff and they can decide, wholly within their option, what they are going to do - it is their stuff - as against what we have done here. MR. FULTON: The committee, if anything, has been much less critical publicly than it has been privately; and we have tried, I think, rather hard not to make criticism just for criticism's sake. H.M.JR: But there would not be all these negotiations and renegotiations of contracts, which are one of the worst things; the question would not have come up. MR. FULTON: On renegotiations, although we were insistent that they do it, our ideas are not exactly the ones that they actually applied. We were thinking in terms of something similar to, say, the Bethlehen Steel situation in the last war where, by reason of the hasty estimate, if you give them the benefit of having made an honest one, you at least must say that the estimated cost was far in excess of what the actual cost turned out to be. We were thinking in terms of setting, perhaps, an estimated cost being the best thing that you could do at the time, and then providing that you would later examine and find out what the actual cost was; and then, in effect, renego- tiate the difference, taking it back if that was not due to some unusual, valuable and efficient operation of the company, but not taking it back if it was due to a saving which the company should be given credit for having made, of a type that his competitors did not make. Instead, we find that some of the renegotiations are not much different from the policy of saying, "What did you make during the last five years?" And then 10/s 56 - 22 say, "You shall make no more than that, no matter whether you do a good job or bad," which, if you are to adopt it, could be adopted much more simply by simply saying cost plus your average profits for the last five years. You would not have to have renegotiations if that were your method. H.M.JR: Well, I am glad you came down. You see, I am interested, personally. I follow this thing; I do it personally. And if, when you get back, you think of anything else, come back to see me. MR. FULTON: Thank you very much. C0PY 57 October 5, 1942. Dear Henry: For your information, the British have taken $390,000,000 of the loan RFC authorized to them of $425,000,000. The balance is available to them upon request. This loan, as you know, was made to provide the British with dollar exchange without necessitating the forced sale of their American securities. The proceeds were to be used by Great Britain to pay for war supplies purchased in this country and contracted for prior to the approval of the Lend-Lease Act on March 11, 1941. Substantially all the collateral covered by the pledge agreement has been delivered. Collections to date aggregate approximately $42,700,000 which, except for a few small sales, came from income on the collateral. Of this, $23,500,000 has been applied on principal of the loan, the balance as interest or held as reserves. Due to increased taxes the income from the collateral undoubtedly will not be as good for some time to come, but it should be sufficient to service the loan according to contract. Sincerely yours, (Signed) Jesse H. Jones Secretary of Commerce. Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, Washington, D.C. C0PY 58 October 8, 1942. My dear Jesse: Thank you for your letter of October 5, 1942, informing me of the current status of the loan extended by the RFC to the British Government against British holdings of U.S. securities and other British investments in the United States. The British dollar position has improved steadily over the past year and the prospects are favorable for the future. Largely for this reason, I think it is likely that the British Government will not avail itself of the remainder of the loan. I am enclosing for your information a copy of the latest statement received from the British Government on its gold and U.S. dollar assets. It shows that, as of August 31, 1942, the British Treasury held gold and U.S. dollars totalling $858 million, exclusive of $110 million of gold borrowed from Belgium. These holdings have increased somewhat since that date. Sincerely, (Signed) H. Morgenthau, Jr. Secretary of the Treasury. The Honorable Jesse H. Jones, The Secretary of Commerce. Enclosure TMK:r1 10/7/42 58-A November 6, 1942 4:11 p.m. Breckinridge Henry. Long: HM Jr: What in God's name is the sweat about this thing, L: I'll tell you what it's about. It's about HM Jr: Good Heavens ! You people have a letter over there Breck? for over two months, and I spoke to Cordell Hull and he says there's no hurry whatsoever.. L: No, I'll tell you what it is. It's not asking you for a decision this afternoon. I've simply got in the position - this is in connection with other events with which you are familiar HM Jr: But which L: And - huh? HM Jr: L: Hull doesn't seem to be familiar. He said, "Henry, take all the time that you want. Yeah, for the deciskon. I just wanted to - to do this, I wanted - the French Ambassador has been buzzing around here for three or four days on it, and I wanted simply to tell him that I had discussed the matter with you, and that the matter was receiving careful Treasury consideration, and I couldn't do that without talking to you or getting hold of Pehle, and Pehle was not available. I had no idea of pressing you for a decision this afternoon. I sent word to you to that effect in the first instance. HM Jr: Well, any way I took it up at Cabinet - not at Cabinet - I took it up after Cabinet with the President and Cordell. L: Yes. HM Jr: And the decision was - I asked Cordell before Cabinet so as not to embarrass him whether it had anything to do with any other matters, and he said, "Absolutely not." 58-B 2- L: Well, it has only to do with other matters here in connection with the relationships between the Embassy and here in connection with other matters. HM Jr: Well, evidently he isn't aware of that. L: Yes, and I'm just trying to keep it quiet here, you see? HM Jr: Yes, but evidently he doesn't know because he said that there was no hurry. L: Yeah. Well, there isn't any hurry for the decision HM Jr: Well, this is what the President decided - that we L: Yeah. HM Jr: Right? L: Yeah. HM Jr: And enough money for one more shipment. L: Well, you may not need the other shipment. HM Jr: What's that? L: You may not need the other shipment. HM Jr: Well, the President realizes that but he said to but there was the fact that I had to have a conversation with you on the subject. give the Red Cross the money for the shipment which has already gone - which is $220,000. give them enough more money, and that would be another two twenty, wouldn't it? L: Well, I don't know exactly what the details would be, but the thing was that we had made a commitment to carry on up to the time we made a commitment - up to the first of October, and certain of those sums are in arrears. 58-C -3- HM Jr: Well L: It doesn't involve the transfer - the expenditure of the funds, but simply the transfer of the credits, because I doubt very much whether the funds can be expended for this purpose. HM Jr: Well, according to this letter it says that they shipped 248 tons at a cost of $220,000 - that's Item No. 1. L: That's right. HM Jr: Well, we're advancing the two twenty? Hello? L: Yes. HM Jr: Then the President said to keep it on a 24-hour basis and give them enough money for one more shipment. L: Yeah. HM Jr: Now does that help you out? L: Yes, that's fine. I didn't expect even that. HM Jr: Well, but this helps more? L: Yes. HM Jr: L: Is this entirely satisfactory? It's fine - perfect - and I'll tell him that they' 11 get the two hundred twenty now, and you'll take care of the next in the near future. HM Jr: Now, let's see - you're going to tell him they get All I wanted to do is just to have a conversation with you and then tell him that it was progressing. the two twenty 58.D -4L: I'm going to tell them that the 248 tons will be paid for now. HM Jr: L: That money will be released today. All right. And the next approximately similar amount for the next shipment will be forthcoming in the near future. HM Jr: Well, if that's good enough for you, that's better. L: Perfect. HM Jr: Well, then I'll just tell our people to clear the two twenty, and when the papers come around on another similar shipment to meet that if the ship- ment goes. L: Yeah - if the shipment goes. HM Jr: Is that right? L: That's right. HM Jr: Now that's all right with you? L: That's perfect. HM Jr: Okay. L: Thank you, Henry. HM Jr: Thank you, Breck. 59 November 6, 1942 Present: Mr. Paul Mr. Pehle After Cabinet I spoke to the President. I gave him Mr. Paul's letter of October 13 to Mr. Hull and Mr. Hull's letter of November 6 to me, received at 12:15 today. The President read both carefully and said, "We will do what the Treasury said; we will keep on a twenty-four-hour basis and let another shipment go." So I said, "We will pay for the past shipment of $220,000 and tell them that they can make another one." The President said, "That is right." I talked to Mr. Hull before Cabinet. I said, "Is there any particular reason why there is such a hurry about this?" He said, "There is none whatsoever." I said, "Breckinridge Long put me under such terrific pressure." He said, "There is no reason in the world why you should be under pressure. Take all the time that you want," which is just contrary to what Breckinridge Long told Mrs. Klotz. So I spoke to Breckinridge Long on the telephone. He gave me certain reasons, which I will not go into, and he said, "If I simply could tell the French Ambassador, who has been fussing about this, that we would pay for the shipment already made, $220,000, and consider another one, that would be more than satisfactory to me." So I said, "Fine." I repeat, we are to pay the $220,000, and they will consider making another shipment; if another shipment is made, then we will take it up. In other words, we will take them up one at a time. 60 SECRETARY OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON November 6. 1942 In reply refer to SD My dear Mr. Secretary: I refer to Mr. Paul's letter of October 13, 1942 in regard to two applications for license filed by the French Ameri can Banking Corporation to debit the account of the French Government to pay a total of $2,200,000 to the Ameri can Red Cross to be used for the purchase of canned meat to be shipped to the International Red Cross Committee in Geneva for distribution to French prisoners of war. This matter has been accorded renewed consideration and the Department is of the opinion that for political reasons shipments of meat for French prisoners of war should be permitted to pass through the blockade for distribution by the International Red Cross Committee in amounts not to exceed 500 tons per month. The American Red Cross has informed the Department that it has already shipped 248 tone of meat at a cost and that the estimated cost of purchasing and shipping 1,500 tons of meat (500 tons each for the months of October, November, and December) is $1,310,000. It would, therefore, be appreciated if $1,530,000 of the total of $2,200,000 requested in the above-mentioned applications filed by the French American Banking Corporation would be released to the American Red Cross in order that they might be reimbursed for expenditures already made and that they might proceed with the purof $220,000, for which reimbursement has not been made, chase and shipment of meat on a regular monthly basis. I may add that even though the American Red Cross has requested an advance of funds for use in connection with the purchase and shipment of this meat, they have assured the Department that in the event of a change in policy the meat shipments can be halted on very short notice. Sincerely yours, POR VICTORY BUY The Honorable Correstment Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury. 61 reply please afer to: 26344 OCT 13 1942 Funds' by dear Mr. Secretary: Reference is made to Assistant Secretary Achooon's letters of July 10, 1942 (SD 840.51 Presen Credits/6096), and August 13, 1942 (SD 840.51 Presen Credits/7109), to this Department's letter of August 1, 1942, and to embrequent conversations between represente- tives of your Department and numbers of the staff of Foreign Funds Central senserning applications filed by the French American Danking Corporation for a license to debit the account of the French Government to pay $1,300,000 to the American Red Gross to be used for the purchase of earned meat to be shipped to the International Red Gross Committee in deneva for distribution to French priseners of war. Shortly before receiving Mr. Achesea's letter of August 13 under reference, this Department received another application of a similar nature involving 8900,000. In view of the amounts and the policy questions involved in these applications, this Department has been giving further consideration to the problem. The matter has been discussed with representatives of the American Red Gross, and a copy of a letter from Mr. Maurice Pate of that organisation, dated October 1, 1942, is attached. Another element of some ecosem to this Department is the information available in the press and elsewhere indicating that French priseners of war have been performing services which, whether or not falling within the limits of the Geneva Convention, requestionably sake a significant contribution to the enery's war aschine. In any event the Vishy Government has sub- stantial assets outside of the United States which, if permission is granted to use blocked French assets in the United States for such purposes, will be available for other purposes of the French Government which cannot be procured to be necessarily in the interest of the United Nations. Under the circumstances is appears to this Department that from the point of view of commonie warfare it is centuary to the interests of this Government to permit the use of blocked French assets in the 62 .2United States for the purchase of food to be sent to French prisence of war in enemy territory. Accordingly, whee we are advised that for political reasons your Department regards 18 so necessary to w prove the applications under reference, this Department is prepared to dany such applications and any future applications of such nature. Sincerely years, (Signed) Randolph Paul Acting Secretary of the Treasury. The Interable, The Secretary of State. Enclosure. MLHeffeem/af - 10/3/42 63 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE NOV 6-1992 TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Randolph Paul Subject: Relations between the Office of Censorship and Foreign Funds Control. I believe that you will be interested in knowing about the effective manner in which Foreign Funds Control and the Office of Censorship cooperate to their mutual benefit in discharging their respective responsibilities. Early in 1942 an arrangement was worked out for Foreign Funds Control to install representatives in the principal postal censorship stations. These representatives advise the local stations concerning the operations of the freezing control and the type of information which would be most useful to us in the enforcement of the freezing order. In addition, our representatives assist the censors in formulating basic policies concerning international mail of a financial or business nature. The following typical quotations from letters which we have received from the Chief Postal Censor are indicative of the spirit with which our representatives are received by censorship officials. 1. "We appreciate the assistance the Treasury representa- tives render to the stations with particular respect to the proper examination of financial communications to the end that the maximum may be produced for our war effort. 2. "Yesterday I received a letter from the District Postal Censor at San Francisco, in which he stated that the Treasury Department representative in his station had performed highly satisfactory work." The high regard in which Censorship holds our representatives is further indicated by the fact that our representative in the Panama Canal Zone censorship stations has been hired by Censor- ship at a salary of $7,000 to be the District Postal Censor in 64 -2charge of the censorship of all mail in the Panama Canal Zone. Recently, the Chief Postal Censor's Office instituted a new training program in New York to be attended by representa- tives from all stations of Censorship. The Chief Postal Censor gave Foreign Funds Control a prominent place in this training program and called upon our people to conduct the leading sessions. Foreign Funds Control is now receiving daily approximately 3,000 submissions from the Office of Censorship containing financial information, which are of real assistance to us in discharging our responsibilities in administering Executive Order 8389, as amended. From these censorship submissions we obtain valuable leads concerning the direction of ownership and control in complex business organizations and the activities of persons and organizations in which we are interested. Foreign Funds Control and the Office of the Chief Postal Censor have cooperated in devising a procedure for the control of property transmitted through the international mails. They have also cooperated in the solution of problems relative to communications with respect to financial matters, and the regulations of both Censorship and Foreign Funds Control require that Treasury licenses be obtained before persons within the United States may communicate with persons in enemy territory or on the Proclaimed List with respect to financial or commercial transactions. REI 65 TREASURY DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT DIVISION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR November 6, 1942 MEMORANDUM TO THE SECRETARY: A meeting was held at Mr. Stettinius' office on October 29th and was attended by Ambassador Litvinov, representatives of the Government Purchasing Commission of the Soviet Union in the United States, likewise, Lend-Lease officials, and representatives of the procurement agencies. The two principal subjects discussed had to do with the problem of supplying food to the Soviet government and shipping facilities. Concerning the food problem, the possibility of using dehydrated and concentrated foods was discussed at considerable length with the thought in mind of conserving shipping space, it being explained that some phases of this proposed program were still in the experimental stages. Concerning the transportation situation, the Soviet representatives emphasized the point that there is delay in loading ships which limits the usefulness of the limited number of ships available to them to a decreased number of round trips, and they also spoke of the delay in moving cargo from eastern suppliers to west coast ports. It was indicated at the meeting that Admiral Akulin of the Government Purchasing Commission of the Soviet Union and others of his group together with transportation representatives of the War Department would go to the west coast within a few days after the meeting and endeavor to work out arrangements to speed up loading and make further shipping facilities available to the Soviet government as soon as possible. At the Lend-Lease staff meeting on Wednesday morning of this week, the proposed order to centralize forwarding of Lend-Lease cargo from suppliers or warehouses and consignment to PORVICTORY BUY THE 66 -2- the War Shipping Administration was discussed, and it was stated that the change would be effective December 1st. I think this is a good move and should help the situation. Director Clifton of Procurement E. mount Mack Signature 67 TREASURY DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT DIVISION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR November 6, 1942 At MEMORANDUM TO THE SECRETARY: Upon my return to the office yesterday afternoon, I checked the files to learn when Executive Order 9235 had been taken up with you, and I find that on May 12, 1942, I had lunch at your office with General Balyaev and Captain Vladimorov and it is my recollection that at the conclusion of the luncheon I remained at your office for a moment after they had left and very briefly mentioned the fact that a proposed Executive Order giving the Bureau of the Budget authority to determine effec- tive utilization of property and providing for control of field warehousing by ourselves had been sent to the General Counsel and, no doubt, would be taken up with you for clearance. The legal file at Procurement Division contains a memorandum dated May 12, 1942, copy attached, which indicates Mr. Foley talked with you about the matter on that date. Also attached is a copy of Executive Order 9235. I also wrote to you on August 8, 1942, relative to the warehousing phases of the Executive Order. forter Clifton of Procurement Work E. Mack Director PORVICTORY BUY 68 (COPY) May 12, 1942 To Mr. Thurman Hill From E. H. Foley, Jr. I spoke to the Secretary this morning about the proposed Executive Order submitted by the Bureau of the Budget providing for distribution and utilization of shortage supplies and equipment for the Government. I have made the change on page 5 which he suggested. Otherwise, the proposed draft is agreeable to him. 69 EXECUTIVE ORDER 9235 sim PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF SUPPLIES BIGST AND EQUIPMENT BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES sm 00 1091 199701030 JANKSRY INS at bedallope N Hinda 74090 KINT a By virtue of the authority vested in me by Title I of the First War Powers Act, 1941 (Public Law 354--77th cong.), by Title II of the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (42 Stat. 20), and-as President of the United States, and for the purpose of providing such general direction and control over the use of supplies and equipment in the Executive branch of the Government as will insure the most economical and effective utilisation thereof, it is hereby ordered as follows: 1. AS used in this order: can 05113 .goo (a) Government agency means any executive department, independent establishment, agency, commission, board, bureau, division, administration, service, or office of the Executive branch of the Federal Government, including any independent regulatory commission or board and any Govemment-owned or Government-controlled corporation. (b) Supplies and equipment means any and all supplies, equipment, machines, commodities, accessories, parts, assemblies, or products of any kind in the possession of any Government agency, whether new or used, in use or in storage: Provided, that supplies and equipment which the Director of the Bureau of the Budget determines to be within the following categories shall not be subject to this order: (1) tactical supplies and equipment of the War Department, the Navy Department, or the United States Maritime Commission, (2) food and clothing, (3) construction materials acquired for the maintenance or construction of housing, electric power works or facilities, roads, reservoirs, or other physical improvements (4) supplies and equipment acquired by any Government agency for transfer or export to any foreign government, and (5) supplies and equipment acquired from foreign or domestic sources for stock piling in connection with the war. 2. The Director of the Bureau of the Budget, acting through such assistants as he may designate, shall: (a) Survey supplies and equipment in possession of Government agencies and the utilization thereof. For this purpose he may require the Government agencies to submit reports and estimates in such form and at such times as he may find necessary: Provided, that in making such surveys he shall utilize, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the services and facilities of the Procurement Division of the Treasury Department: (b) Develop and promulgate such qualitative and quantitative standards with respect to subplies and equipment used by Government agencies as he may deem necessary to effectuate the purposes of this order: (c) Require, when, in his opinion, such action is necessary or expedient, the transfer from one Government agency to another, for permanent or temporary use, of such supplies and equipment as he may determine to be surplus to the needs of one agency and essential to the needs of another agency: (d) Consult with and seek the advice of the War Production Board in connection with the administration of paragraphs (a), (b). and (c) above: (e) Issue such regulations and directives as may be necessary to effectuate this order. 3. The Procurement Division of the Treasury Department shall undertake such warehousing, rehabilitation, and physical distribution of supplies and equipment for Government agencies, and, in connection therewith, shall take over such Government warehouses, appurtenant facilities, and personnel used or employed by other Government agencies in the performance of these functions, together with such funds heretofore or hereafter provided therefor, as the Director of the Bureau of the Budget may approve. (over) (35208) SVITUDENS BESS 4. This order shall become effective October 16, 1942, and shall continue in force and fect so long as Title I of the First War Powers Act, 1941, remains in force. et. 5. This order shall be published in the FEDERAL REGISTER. tast struct 2012 In 1 FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT Monthu THE WHITE HOUSE, 96) take to are Jasbur $153 to 11 91912 to are 952 as 35 10 August 31, 1942. **** to progress 123 102.55 and Design in the Institu 071300083 and at that subjeque to 910 Auto 10:00 INVOICE 20 benefits education 9.1 = 12009003 bas fage add STATE (F.RR.DDC. 42-8645; Filed, September 2, 1942: 2:19 p.m.) 116016 SING at bear as it decare this to 001770 to (a) -VOC the bas present 10 anterinton production Identification con anterioat families 00/20 TO - WAN politique its has the and college (d) 003 12 Sex YOU to education GRS that card at to FAU nd about to was toil any starts BE of 2009 edd to under see ID give @GS - to Duta to DISE Spotties (1): ******* side as antadoso bra 2001 (s) entities retent with TO 2001 dum +1507 VO to annoy - watered to 5 miss 10% DETINOMS DHE bitte (a) - Isoteydo Yeara do religion is para James Mistor 1216 oz 70 10) station and adja are down 757 01200000 TO disnot mini - Yes AC to itsure sattos JORDUE add In life to 70759927 and all tine 2212 bar to of ban - down 6210ger pables as a and estimate 2016 en atnz TOT (a) DESAR ADD has 0801790 at JAIN THE the appoi six RE: to sits to out OF destate by SING does / area 20 ministe adit 10 - - 02 and STREET 131% has actually and no state Year of 86 Insurance 20 beau bee DIEN (a) wells ettly to cases most on NO to at dsua indiate atd in -10 to shasa and to .000 Through TO 1 501 New and (5) 02 Under 6.00 to theme edj 07 suzgeon / ed or 03 - is am -00 ons 4714 at the and add to active into alea bas date Tigench reputes. (A) (n). (d) to) are 02 sit MAN in bita adquisition down to oural (0) not to DAY - 102 that 620 to with to 1020en10 To and 01 adidas ISTAIN Tax takes Elector and to Viozeteda Debivors to profession 19770 about House to di IN Insurance Eam dentist 987 to - (Nevo) (35.208) 70 August 8, 1942 MEMORANDUM TO THE SECRETARY: We have been doing some preliminary planning to 00- ordinate governmental warehousing, exclusive of military stores. At the present time, throughout the United States warehouses of various Government agencies are being oper- ated independently of each other and freguently are located within the same city or area. An Executive Order proposed by the Bureau of Budget now pending approval by the President provides in part that the Procurement Division shall take over warehousing for Government agencies, which includes facilities, personnel, and funds. A very substantial part of the field warehousing is now carried on by the various agencies of the Department of Agriculture. I have talked with Mr. Samuel A. Snyder, Chief, Division of Purchase, Sales and Traffic, Department of Agriculture, with the thought in mind of bringing him into the Procurement Division as Assistant to the Director, Grade 14, salary $65500, to do the planning and supervise the operation of coordinating all federal warehousing in the field service where there is a common need for warehousing. After several talks with Mr. Snyder, he has indicated his willingness to join us; and I feel very pleased about it because we need men of his type in our organization. In my opinion, Mr. Snyder is the best qualified procurement man in any of the Government agencies we are buying for now. For many years he has been constantly in touch with the field agencies of the Department of Agriculture on procurement matters. He is essentially a field man, knows field problems and field person- nel, and I think he is well suited to take over the responsibility of coordinating all field warehousing and then carrying on the operation after the planning has been completed. The planning and coordination is a detailed job which will prob- 71 -2- ably keep Mr. Snyder in the field more or less continually for the next year or two; and when the job is completed, there should be a substantial savings as well as much more efficient operation than the present system of each agency operating its own warehousing without regard to the other. I will keep you informed as the program develops. Clifton E. Mack Director of Procurement 72 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE TO NOV - 1942 Secretary Morgenthau FROM Randolph Paul On October 14 we received from the State Department a reply to your letter of September 18 in which you requested that this Department be furnished with a report on the mission of Cochran and Meltzer to Argentina. The State Department's letter enclosed a copy of this report, describing it as containing the personal views of Messrs. Cochran and Meltzer. Such letter also stated that an Argentine program had been developed and, without giving the full details of such program, suggested certain specific measures to the Treasury Department for consideration in connection with such program. We have carefully studied the report submitted by Messrs. Cochran and Meltzer and have found that it does not deal adequately with the situation. Many matters which the Treasury is interested in are not even discussed in the report and those matters which were discussed only cover the situation on a superficial basis. Furthermore, the measures which the State Department suggested for the consideration of this Department are far from adequate. to deal with the Argentine prohlems. The measures suggested by the State Department are only part of a series of measures which this Department had already suggested to the State Department for their consideration. Nevertheless, on the basis of the measures suggested by the State Department, this Department has already recommended to the State Department that certain steps be immediately taken to implement these measures. It appears, however, that the State Department is not even prepared to wholeheartedly implement the limited measures suggested in their letter, and we are convinced that the primary purpose of the State Department's letter was probably an effort to "make a record" in this matter. 73 -2We have accordingly prepared a letter for your signature addressed to the Secretary of State which contains the following points: (a) We state that the Cochran-Meltzer report is not particularly helpful in the evaluation and solution of the Argentine problems. (b) We request the State Department to furnish full information as to the entire Argentine program. (c) We summarize the steps which we have taken designed to implement the program suggested in the State Department's letter, at the same time stating that it is our opinion that the program suggested is inadequate. (d) We suggest additional measures for the consideration of the State Department whi ch would be designed to more fully control Argentine financial transactions, on the assumption that the State Department objects to an order freezing Argentina. (e) We state that this Department is still strongly of the view that Argentine financial transactions should be subjected to an over-all supervision and control through an order freezing Argentina. In this connection we point out that the State Department previously objected to such an order on the grounds that it would have an adverse affect on certain friendly groups in Argentina and on our good-neighbor policy in general and suggest that these issues be recanvassed in the light of the developments since that time, including official statements by representatives of this Government with respect to Axis activities in Argentina. (f) Our reply concludes by stating that it is your opinion, recognizing the political considerations involved, that this Government cannot justify its failure in this case to take adequate steps designed 74 -3to prevent transactions subject to our jurisdiction which are engaged in by persons within a country maintaining diplomatic and commercial relations with the enemy and which might be detrimental to our war effort. I recommend that you sign the attached letter. This letter will not only have the result of making the record of this Department clear on this issue but may also cause the State Department to approve of the adoption of additional measures with respect to the control of Argentine transactions. hap 75 My dear Mr. Secretary: Further reference is made to your Department's letter of October 14, 1942, in which certain specific measures were suggested for consideration by this Department in connection with the implementation of the Argentine program referred to in such letter. Your letter was in response to my letter of September 18, 1942, which requested a report on the mission to Argentina of representatives of your Department. As you know, this Department was particularly interested in this mission and was prepared to send its own representstives to Argentina for this purpose. We appreciate your furnishing us with a copy of the report, which has been carefully studied by this Department. We have not found this report particularly helpful in the evaluation and solution of the Argentine problems to be met. It is noted that your letter refers to the develop- ment of an Argentine program of which the financial measures suggested are only a part. This Department would appreciate receiving full information as to the entire program in order that it may be in a position to integrate its financial controls with the other portions of the program. The development of a satisfactory Argentine program in the financial field has been the subject of considerable discussion for many months between representatives of our respective Departments. As you know, this Department has been contending that Argentine financial transactions sub- ject to the jurisdiction of this Government should be placed under supervision and control through the issuance of an order freezing Argentina, accompanied by appropriate general licenses. Inasmuch as your Department has objected to such an overall control of Argentine transactions, a series of specific measures designed to enable this Government to 76 -2obtain more complete information concerning Argentine nationals and transactions and to control Argentine financial transactions in so far as possible on an ad hoe basis have been discussed with representatives of your Department. The specific measures which have now been approved by your Department and which are described in items (1), (2), and (3) of your letter are designed to implement, in part, an ad hoe program. Since your letter was received, this Department has taken the following action with respect to those measures included in your letter: (a) By letter dated October 22, 1942, we forwarded to your Department the names of 64 persons and firms in Argentina having unsatis- factory ratings according to the records of the World Trade Intelligence Division of your Department, together with a summary of certain information concerning the undesirable activities of such persons and firms. It was proposed in the letter that these persons and firms be subjected to ad hoe freezing action immediately and be given immediate consideration for inclusion in The Proclaimed List. These cases were discussed at meetings attended by representatives of our respective Departments, and your Department approved the immediate application of ad hoo freezing action to 44 of these persons and firms. Appropriate instructions have been issued to the Federal Reserve Banks ordering that such persons and firms be ad hoc blocked. For your information in connection with the procedure employed in taking such action, there is enclosed a copy of Confidential Circular No. 158A to all Federal Reserve Banks and a copy of a telegram dated November 2, 1942, sent to such Banks. (b) By letter dated October 30, 1942, we forwarded to your Department the names of over 180 individuals in Argentina who are closely connected with firms on The Proclaimed List, and proposed that such individuals be subjected to ad hoe freezing action immediately. 77 -3(e) By letter dated October 31, 1942, we forwarded to you a list of exchange houses in Argentina, which, as reported by the Embassy in Buenos Aires, have continued to deal in dollar currency transactions in the black market. We proposed that these firms be subjected to ad hoe freezing action immediately. (d) By letter dated October 31, 1942, we proposed the application of ad hoo freezing action to Banco de la Provincia, Banco de la Nacion, and Pascual Hermanos and proposed action with respect to Shaw Strupp and Company which would enable this Department to supervise the transactions subject to our jurisdiction which are engaged in by such firm. With respect to item (4) of your letter, this Department by letter dated October 30, 1942, submitted for the consideration of your Department a proposed general rul- ing which excludes transactions between persons in Europe and persons in the American Republica from outstanding general licenses and requires that before any such transaction may be engaged in, ft must receive the specific approval of the Treasury Department. With respect to the country-by-country analysis of TFR-300 data, referred to in your letter, you are advised that such an analysis has been under preparation for some time, and as soon as such an analysis is completed with respect to any particular country in Latin America, it will be furnished to you. The success of any Argentine ad hoe program is necessarily dependent upon the ability of this Government to obtain adequate information concerning persons within Argentina engaged in undesirable activities and concerning undesirable transactions subject to our jurisdiction engaged in by persons within Argentina, and to obtain this information in ample time to prevent these undesirable activities. Under existing circumstances the primary sources for obtaining this information are the representatives of this Government stationed in the field, in particular the officers and per- sonnel of our Embassy and Consulate staffs in Argentina. 78 In the light of the above, it is believed that the following steps are desirable in connection with the administration of the ad hoe program described in your letter, and these steps are recommended for your considerations (1) Our Embassy and Consulate staffs in Argentina should be made thoroughly familiar with the functions and purposes of the ad hoe program described in your letter and should be requested to compile lists, on the basis of the information available to them, of those Argentine persons, firms, and accounts which should in their judgment be subjected to ad hoe freesing action. Such lists should be made promptly available to this Department, with your comments and such other information as may be available to your Department. (2) In addition, the State Department should advise the Treasury Department of any other persons, firms, and accounts in Argentina which, on the basis of all the information available to the State Department, the State Department believes should be subjected to ad hoe freezing action. This Department will, of course, continue to advise your Department of those cases in which, on the basis of informa- tion available to this Department, it is believed that ad hoc freezing action should be taken. This Department desires to cooperate fully with your Department in the implementation of the Argentine pro- gram referred to in your letter. This Department strongly recommends, however, that additional measures be adopted so as to enable this Government to supervise and control more adequately Argentine transactions. You state in your letter that the Argentine program which has been developed is designed to prevent, within the limits of our control, economic operations beneficial to 79 5- the Axis. It is the view of this Department that the program described in your letter is inadequate to prevent such operations, although it will have some effect in that direction. The program described in your letter contemplates the control of transactions through the application of ad hoe freezing action to certain persons and firms in Argentina. The program does not envisage the control on an ad hoc basis of individual transactions, which may be inimical to this country's war effort, but which may be engaged in by persons who would not be subject to ad hoe freezing action on the basis of the standards set forth in your letter. It was to meet this particular objection that this Department has suggested that arrangements be made with the Office of Censorship sotthat all financial communications between the United States and Argentina will be examined and the information contained therein forwarded to this Department, and, in case of communications relating to the more important transactions, that the contents of such communications will be received by this Department in advance of their transmission to destination. By utilising the information thus obtained from Censorship, and from other sources concorning Argentine transactions, this Government would be in a position to single out those transactions which appear to be of an undesirable character, and require the American banks or institutions which are parties to such transactions to hold up their execution until we obtain further informtion as to the nature of the transactions. This Department is prepared to take such action immediately if you have no objection. So long as this Government attempts to control inimical Argentine transactions, through the procedure of an ad hoe program, as distinguished from an overall supervision and control, this Department is of the opinion that additional measures such as those referred to above are essential in order to give the fullest possible effect to such an ad hoe program. Nevertheless, this Department is still strongly of the view that Argentine financial transactions subject to our jurisdiction should be subjected to an overall supervision and control. It is impossible adequately to control 80 inimical financial transactions subject to our jurisdiction which are engaged in by persons within a foreign country such as Argentina through a procedure whereby such transactions are freely permitted unless this Government has already ob- tained positive information, prior to the time they are on- gaged in, indicating that they should be examined. Any program which is fully adequate in this respect must be based on the premise that transactions are prohibited unless this Government is furnished with full information concerning such transactions and is satisfied that such transactions should be approved. Since the time that this Department recommended in May, 1942, the issuance of an order freezing generally all Argentine nationals (accompanied by an appropriate general license), the information which has come to the attention of this Department concerning Argentine activities more than confirms the views of this Department as to the necessity of such an overall control. It is understood that the principal objection to a public order freezing Argentine nationals, which was raised by representatives of the State Department at the meeting held in May, 1942, to consider this matter, was the contention that such an order would have an adverse effect on certain friendly groups in Argentina and on our good neighbor policy in general. In view of developments since that time, in- cluding official statements relating to Axis activities in Argentina, it is suggested that the issues involved be recanvassed. Recognising the political considerations involved, I am of the opinion that this Government can not justify its failure in this case to take adequate steps designed to prevent transactions, subject to our jurisdiction, which are engaged in by persons within a country maintaining diplomatic and commercial relations with the enemy and which may be detrimental to our war effort. Very truly yours, The Honorable The Secretary of State. Enclosures JED/ma - 11/6/42 Secretary of the Treasury. 81 OTTO JEIDELS 120 BROADWAY NEW YORK CITY November 6, 1942 Mrs. H. S. Klotz Secretary to Secretary of the Treasury Treasury of the United States Washington, D. C. Dear Mrs. Klotz: I thank you for your telephone message, and will call on the Secretary on Tuesday, November 10, at 3:30, as suggested by you. While the Secretary knows me and has been very kind to me at the few interviews, he may like to be informed about my personal record, in view of the subject which I intend to submit to him. For this purpose I have written a personal memorandum which you may or may not wish to show or read to the Secretary. I shall leave that decision entirely up to you. With kind regards, Sincerely yours, OJ:MSC Enc. Gr. June PERSONAL Hayse If I remember correctly, I was originally introduced to the Secretary in 1938 by Mr. Abraham Flexner, an old and respected friend, at that time Director of the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton. I reported to the Secretary the situation in Europe which I had just left, and, if my memory does not deceive me, in a pessimistic vein with regard to world peace and the Nazis' aggressive plans. Since then, I believe I have had the honor to be received by the Secretary twice and to submit some opinions about economic problems and developments in Europe. I immigrated just four years ago and have been most of the time since and am now a partner of the New York investment banking house of Lazard Freres & Co. The first citizenship papers which I filed after my immigration, date from November 24, 1938. I am a national of Switzerland where my grandfather had acquired citizenship in 1866 when Prussia annexed Frankfurt on the Main, his and my native town; under Swiss law his male descendants and their wives were entitled to Swiss citizenship; as my wife and I, my 84 year old mother and my brother, now residing in Zurich, Switzerland, are Swiss nationals, but we were all born in Germany. During my activity in Germany and ending in 1938, I was also a German citizen. After my college years in Germany and my graduation as a Ph. D. in political economy, and after some scientific writing on banking and industry as a young man,I entered business at the bottom in this country as a "runner" and then a clerk in the New York brokerage firm of J. S. Bache & Co., after which I worked several years in Germany, England and U. S. for a large metal merchant house, among it for the better part of a year in the metal ore and smelting business in Colorado. After returning to Germany, I entered the service of one of the principal and oldest German banks, the Berliner Handels-Gesellschaft, with which I have been connected for nearly thirty years (April 1, 1909 until I left German forever on March 8, 2. 83 1938), the last twenty years as managing director and, under the old by-laws of the Bank, as a personally responsible partner. Of this career which filled a good part of a lifetime, from a personal point of view, some more important developments are most vivid in my memory. The intensive industrial work connected with board memberships, some as chairman or vice-chairman, or member of executive committees, as one of my principal duties and, on the other hand, the consulting activity under three presidents of the Central Banking Institution, the Reichsbank in the administration of Government borrowing and monetary policy. - Then my close connection with the international members of the Reparation Commission before and after the Dawes Plan. - After the collapse of the German financial structure erected on repara- tion policy and foreign borrowing, I had the satisfaction of functioning as one of the two German bankers delegated to settle without recourse to the Governments the German private indebtedness to the international banking community, amounting in 1931 to about $12 billion gold dollars; when I resigned this delegation after six and a half years on leaving Germany, about 90% of this indebtedness had been liquidated, the Ameri- can interest in particular down to little over $30 million. Some of my most cherished American and other international friendships are the heritage of this thorny but fascinating activity. - In the same year of financial crisis, 1931, I was with my colleagues in the management of the Berliner Handels-Gesellschaft a beneficiary of the good fortune which enabled the bank, as the only private institution of the kind in the country, to survive the crisis without assistance by the Government, without recapitalization and even without being compelled to pass the annual dividend. To this day I am grateful for such kindness of fate in critical times. 3. 84 Another pleasant recollection is the opportunity afforded to me by the British Government in the winter 1930-1931 to serve as an expert to a Committee on Banking in India. I am deeply grateful to have had this privilege of learning much of the real story of India, now so widely misunderstood, and for the opportunity to form on this complex problem an opinion equally appreciative of the unparalleled achievement of Britain in India as of the ideal and material aspiration of the populace of India. May I be permitted to add a few words which might find the Secre- tary's interest in spite of their personal character. Everybody who does not try to suppress human nature in himself, has his regrets about his past and here or there some pride. I am grateful for the good fortune and proud of a record that during the whole period of Nazi persecu- tion of the Jews until I left Germany, in no corporation where I acted as chairman or vice-chairman of the board, any executive and in the bank entrusted to my management any employe has been dismissed or been impaired in his functions owing to his faith or race or political record. When in January 1938 the clock ran out and an executive of an industrial corporation where I was chairman of the board was forced out by the Nazi Party, I resigned from this board and also my position in the bank, the latter under the promise, readily given and faithfully adhered to by the bank's board of directors, of settling generously with the Jewish employees after my departure from the bank and the country. - Having made this personal statement, I feel that honesty and modesty call for an explanation how such effort could be successful in the light of wholesale persecution and in spite of my own Jewish descent. The answer is simple. For me, and in this respect I have been distinctly fortunate where others were helpless victims, the prospect of leaving Germany after many good and bad years of, on the whole, gratifying work, meant the fulfillment of an old dream, the patiently cherished desire to come one day to live in America, 4. the idol of my young years and the haven of many true friendships. This singular position permitted me to identify my fate and decisions with that of 4 persecuted friends and employees, an attitude which has always and everywhere a strong chance of at least temporary success; and in such position I could, with some good fortune on which everybody depends, only win in the end. 0. J. 85 86 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY. November 6, 1942. Mail Report Inasmuch as no new subject appeared in the mail this week, and no new angle on the old subjects, few letters were chosen for abstracting. The official mail was fairly heavy, but the fan mail itself was exceptionally light, and the subjects of bonds and taxes continued to occupy the minds of most of our writers. The ratio of those protesting the new Tax Bill to those approving it is 8 to 1. There is great interest in periodic payment of taxes on a weekly, monthly or quarterly basis. A number have protested higher rates of state and local taxation, and a municipal tax in Phila- delphia has been especially unpopular. There are an increasing number of letters from taxpayers who submit statements of income, expenses, etc., and ask an estimate of what they will have to pay. The question of the tax- ability of Bonds is also coming more and more to the fore. Treasury mail shows that opinion is equally divided as to the merits of a Sales Tax, but on reference from the White House, we have received 139 postal cards opposing a Sales Tax and advocating one on gross income. We also have had few letters commenting on the Victory Tax, but have received 44 pieces of mail from the White House containing protests of this tax as failing to take into consideration ability to pay. December 7 is running a close race with Christmas as a suggested occasion for a bond selling campaign. One writer states that a billion dollars' worth of bonds can be sold this December 7 alone. Suggestions follow the lines of earlier mail, and complaints have dropped to 22. These deal with issuing, reissuing, and redeeming bonds, and about one-third are from employees of War and Navy Departments. Anti-labor views, demands for Government economy, and comments on inflation have been much less 87 -2Memorandum for the Secretary. November 6, 1942. frequent, but there is an increase in letters requesting a published denial of the report that bank accounts will be frozen by the Government. There is only a slight increase in inquiries as to wage stabilization. Since the Office of Economic Stabilization has been set up it has referred to us from 6 to 12 letters or telegrams a day. This correspondence is for the most part referred to Mr. Sullivan. We received a grand total of 1,128 pieces of mail from the White House during October. Exclusive of postal card campaigns, there were 945 pieces to be handled. The highest receipts during previous Octobers occurred in 1938 when there were 467 pieces referred from the White House. Gabrelle E. 88 General Comments J. Thomas Edwards, Lubbock, Texas. I am writing you this letter to express our appreciation here in Lubbock, Texas, and all of this part of Texas, for having a man like you as our Secretary of the Treasury. You and the President have done more for the people of the United States of America than any two people that there has ever been, and this part of the country is for you both 100%, and for what you have done and propose to do. In getting a law passed limiting all salaries to $25,000 per year and a tax on corporations in excess of 6% on their capital has done more to help the small people and companies than anything that has ever been done. I am personally proud of the way you have tried to stop the powerful German Trust of I. G. Farben by taking their stock, and for the sake of the world and God's sake fix it where they cannot get this stock back into their power. * I have worked all of my life in banks and have been President of a small Texas Country Bank, and I know the way and manner in which the bankers have taken the advantage of people, and what has gone on in the banks. And for the farmers, help keep the Farm Security in force for they are doing a wonderful work with the farmers and it should be where any farmer could go to the Farm Security and borrow money at a low rate of interest and not go to the banks. Joseph Carl Saltman, Director, Camp Chickawah, Harrison, Maine. The enclosed check for $50.00 is sent to you by the boys of Camp Chickawah who took care of an acre of stringbeans last summer, and picked 2,500 pounds which were bought by the Portland Packing Company. The boys want you to send this money to the organization where you think it might serve our cause best. You may even add this drop to the Government funds now needed so much to * build the planes to blast the enemy. 89 -2Favorable Comments on Bonds Walter W. Phelps, Santa Paula, Calif. Under the Agricultural Conservation and Parity Program Payments I, as a farmer planting a cover crop each fall, received my 1942 application today. By simply signing my name, am to receive $35.63. For three years now I have I taken this money, feeling that while legally entitled to it, the money is actually wasted because any good farmer would follow the practice anyway. # * Why not pay it out in War Bonds and Stamps? What I will do when my check comes will be add $1.87 in cash and get a $50 Bond. If that represents an impractical method, why not put an inslip in the envelope containing the check, sug- gesting the purchase of Bonds or Stamps? 90 -3Unfavorable Comments on Bonds M. G. Neyrey, Auditor, Higgins Industries, Inc., New Orleans, La. We have been endeavoring to cooperate with the Treasury Department in securing additional sales of War Bonds and as every one is aware of the shortage of skilled office help, we have been trying to purchase machines to expedite the work. The Burroughs Adding Machine Company have on hand, packed and ready for shipment, two machines which we ordered from them on October 24, 1942, and on which we made application for priorities on the same date, sending same by air mail to the War Production Board, who received it on October 26, 1942. Though we have been in daily communication with the Office Machinery Department of the War Production Board, we have been unable to get this priority issued. We believe we are being given the run around by the War Production Board, and the sale of War Bonds is being seriously hampered because we are unable to keep up with the speed with which our men want their War Bonds after they have paid for them. We are spending very nearly $4,000 for these two machines to help the war effort and certainly it is not helping us individually but helping the Government of the United States of America. Howell Brewer, Cleveland, Ohio. I am a regular employee of The Aluminum Company of America, whose plant is located at 2210 Harvard Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio; and as such am taking approximately forty percent of my wages in War Bonds, according to the payroll deduction plan. I am, however, disappointed that I am not receiving my Bonds anywhere from four to eight weeks after they have been fully paid for, and they are being dated the date I re- ceive them, instead of the date on which they were purchased. Ninety percent of all the employees of this company are taking at least ten percent of their wages in War Bonds, and they are experiencing the same diffi- culty. I have repeatedly asked those in charge of the Bond purchasing why these Bonds are not purchased on time, and no satisfactory explanation has been given. If this condition continues it will mean that a large number of 91 -4the employees will cancel their payroll deductions for the purchase of War Bonds. For this reason I am taking the liberty of asking you to conduct an investigation with the purpose of determining why these Bonds cannot be delivered on time, and if not, why they cannot be dated as of the date of purchase instead of four to eight weeks later. Mrs. Jacob Levine, Bronx, New York, sends copy of let- ter addressed to the Postmaster General. "I herewith wish to register very strenuous complaint as to the manner in which your Department is assisting the Treasury Department of this country in the sale of U. S. War Bonds and Stamps. In compliance with the request made by our Government I had purchased War Stamps - the easy way to purchase War Bonds - to help in the present emer- gency. On August 27, 1942, I presented my book of War Stamps at the Bond window of the Highbridge Post Office in New York City. The very brilliant clerk at the window, Mr. M. Greenberg, after first cancelling all the stamps in this book, noted that one of the stamps had a very small piece rubbed off. This evi- dently occurred from two sheets of stamps being stuck together. However, the clerk, M. Greenberg by name, decided in his own mind that this stamp was no good and could not be redeemed. Having purchased these stamps in good faith, I insisted that the Government hold to its contract. After consulting with a number of clerks or supervisors in this office, it was finally decided to give me a receipt for my stamps, and submit the book for examination by what Mr. Greenberg termed the proper authorities. On August 31 I received a letter from Mr. Albert Goldman in which he informed me that my book of stamps had been sent to the Third Assistant Postmaster General for advice as to the redemption of this partic- ular album of stamps. It is now over two months since I requested a War Bond and no action has been taken -- all of which proves the truth of my former state- ment that the Government cannot be in such dire straits, which led me, my family, and friends to the conclusion that there was no need for purchasing any more Stamps or Bonds. 92 -5Unfavorable Comments on Taxation # It would be a real source of satisfaction if we could find in some Treasury utterance an assurance that the Department realizes that John A. Ingham, Leonia, N.J. # a good many people have no increased income and must of necessity curtail their buying. We want to do our part, but we cannot pay out. what we do not receive. I realize that your tasks are onerous; I would not add to your burdens, but I do ask that you take a little thought for those who have no war profits in any way, shape or manner. With sincere appreciation of your courteous attention, and with best wishes for the fullest success in solving the great problems you face. John Vernou Bouvier, Counsellor-at-Law, N.Y.C. In the New York Times you were reputed to have said, in sub- stance, that the rates of taxation in Britain were about double those obtaining in the United States. Are you actually persuaded that such is literally the fact, and have you, in the expression of such belief, considered the enormous state taxes that, for example, we in New York, as you are aware, are constrained to pay; to say nothing, of course, of the incalculable multiplicity of indirect taxes that attach to practically everything in our lives, save our respiration. Grace J. Kinsey, Jersey City, N.J. Where is this excess income you talk about mopping up with the new Revenue Bill? We white-collar workers have not seen any of it, yet we have not created the high cost of living either. The taxes already passed and threatened ones to come will make it impossible for me to continue my annuity insurance premiums of $350 per year, or about 13% of my salary. Of this 13% over 5% is invested in War Savings Bonds by the Insurance Company. In addition, I have Invested 5% of my salary voluntarily in War Bonds, but when compulsory savings start, I shall be forced to give up my 5% voluntary investment, for I have more than 5% regular medical bills. Washington seems to be bent on penalizing the -6- 93 thrifty citizen who, while Washington was creating inflation during the past 8 years by wild spending, was desperately denying himself to keep up heavy premiums under a 20% cut in salary during the depression. It was loudly heralded that credit would be allowed for insurance premiums in the new bill, yet you come out with a final bill allowing only infinitesimal credit against the return- able portion of the victory tax, which amounts to nothing. We are not complaining about being taxed, but about the unfair class distinction which will not allow for fixed obligations like insurance premiums - which are SAVINGS AND NOT INFLATIONARY. Hugh Hardyman, Rancho Laurita, Thermal, Calif. Having just repaired a truck, laid up since June, I tried to buy an auto use tax stamp at the local Post Office and was referred to the Collector of Internal Revenue at Los Angeles. I mailed a check for $5.00 to the Collector. The check was returned with the statement that checks must be certified to be acceptable to the Government. So I went to the bank at Coachella, seven miles each way for four tires, and was given a cashier's check, which I was assured would be accepted as the practice of certi- fying checks was abandoned several years ago in this state. Grudging the time taken from harvesting, I mailed the cashier's check. It was returned, as the rules insist on certified checks only, and cashier's checks are not accepted. I have not time to go to the bank again, nor to the Post Office to buy a Money Order, so am sending the cash by mail on the chance it may arrive. Every private enterprise has discovered the convenience of checks, plain personal checks. Why does the Treasury insist on the immense waste of our time by demanding certi- fication? To go to the extent of refusing a cashier's check on a National bank is carrying the practice of No private firm badgering us to extreme limits. # with whom I deal finds certification necessary. Why should you, my own employee, continue this antiquated and wasteful habit? Your facilities for dealing with attempted fraud excel those of any private firm. welcom ADDRESS REPLY TO 94 SEORET EADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY AIR FORCES WAR DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON D.C. WAR DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY AIR FORCES WASHINGTON My dear Mr. Secretary: fil November 6, 1942 Answering your letter of November 5, the following is the information requested. 1. Number of P-51 Mustangs delivered to the British monthly during each of the past twelve months (factory deliveries) is as follows: 1941 November December 1942 38 January February 98 March 36 April 103 34 90 May 85 June 79 July August September October 26 Total 13 80 0 682 2. Number of heliocopters (as distinguished from autogiros) produced in the United States for the Army Air Forces monthly during each of the past twelve months, and estimated production monthly for the remainder of 1942 and for the calendar year 1943 is as follows: The Army Air Forces received 1 Vought-Sikorsky XR-4 during June 1942. It is proposed to secure 15 Vought-Sikorsky XR-4A's, 4 Vought-Sikorsky XR-5's, and 2 Vought-Sikorsky XR-6's. PORVICTORY BUY SECRET SECRET The latest available estimate for the XR-4A's is: 1943 January February 1 0 March 1 April 2 May 3 June 4 July 4 The XR-5's and XR-6's are unscheduled. The Army Air Forces are also procuring 1 XR-1 and 1 XR-1A from Platt LePage. The XR-1 is now undergoing experimental tests and the delivery date is indefinite. The XR-1A is unscheduled until the tests are completed on the XR-1. We do not have full information as to heliocopters being produced for the Navy, but understand that this can be obtained from their Bureau of Aeronautics, Production Branch, Records and Reports, Attention: Miss Hoffer. Sincerely yours, H. H. ARNOLD Lieutenant General, U.S.A. Commanding General, A.A.F. The Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Secretary of the Treasury Treasury Department Washington, D.C. SECRET 95 96 BRITISH AIR COMMISSION 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE WASHINGTON, D. c. TELEPHONE HOBART 9000 PLEASE QUOTE REFERENCE NO With the compliments of British Air Commission who enclose weekly Statement No. 76 covering Aircraft Flight Delivery as at November 3, 1942. The Honourable Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Secretary of the Treasury WASHINGTON, D. C. November 6, 1942. U.S. SECRET 2 CONF IDENTIAL REPORT BRITISH REF. NO. D-55 MOST SECRET LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY REPORT NO. 76 (Covering Movements through November 3, 1942) 1. BOLING FORTRESS I (B17C) off Contract A-5077 20 DELIVERED TO U. K. 2a CONSOLIDATED LIBERATOR TYPES OFF B. A. C. Contracts (A) LB30A (824) off Contract A-5068 6 DELIVERED TO U. K. (B) LIBERATOR I (B2(A) off Contract F-677 19 DELIVERED TO U. K. 1 under repair 20 (c) LIBERATOR II (B2/B) Off Contract F-677 (n) Never taken by U. S. As As F. 55 DELIVERED TO U. K. 1 DELIVERED TO U. K. (Ferry Service) 5 DELIVERED TO M. E. (1 crashed in Africa) 3 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (2 for Establishment, 1 for Ferry Service) at Montreal 65 (b) Taken by U. S. A. A. Z. and returned or kept 14 DELIVERED TO U. K. 6 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Ferry Service) 1 at Montreal 1 at Detroit 2 on special duty 6 RETAKEN BY U. S. A. A. F. 16 KEPT BY U. S. A. A. F. 74 3. LOCKHEED HUDSON y (LONG RANGE) off Contract A-1769 174 DELIVERED TO U. K. 42 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 1 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 1 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 1 at Montreal 2 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 2 CRASHED IN U. S. 2 under repair 225 Excluding one erash written off by contract amendment. SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at end of report) SHORT RANGE HUDSON V off A-1749 168 BRAEVERED TO U. K. (by sea) 6 DELIVERED TO NEW ZEALAND (by sea) 1 FLIGHT DELIVERED TO DEBERT 1 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 6 LOST AT SEA ** Crashed in Canadas returned to Lockheed and written off. Excluding one crash written off by contract amendment. be LOCKHEED HUDSON III off B. A. C. Contracts Contract A-67 RANGE) 46 DELIVERED TO U. K. GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 50 Including "Gift Plane" SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at end of report) SHORT RANGE HUDSON III off A-67 29 DELIVERED TO U. K. (by sea) 1 Resident at Lockheed Plant 30 Page 1 November 4, 1942 SECRET 98 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT REF. NO. D-55 , BRITISH MOST SECRE LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY DEPORT No. (Covering Movements through November 3, 1942) he LOCKHEED HUDSON III off B. A. C. Contracts (B) Contract 4-68 (TOMO RANGE) 211 DELIVERED TO U. K. 3 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 5 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 5 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 1 at Detroit 20 DIVERTED TO U. S. A. A. F. 245 Excluding two crashes written off by contract amendment. SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at and of report) 30 (LONG RANGE) DELIVERED TO NEW ZEALAND (by sea) 71 (SHORT RANGE) DELIVERED TO U. K. (by sea) 101 5. VEGA VENTURA (836) (A) off Contract A-344 (n) LONG RANGE 102 DELIVERED TO U. K. 75 DELIVERED TO SOUTH AFRICA 37 DELIVERED TO PENNFIELD RIDGE 1 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 1 in Iceland 3 on route South Africa 2 at Gunder 6 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 5 at Montroal 13 GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 1 at Miami or West Palm Beach 2 on route Miami or West Palm Beach 5 at Nashville 3 at Detroit (including 2 for South Africa) 3 CRASHED IN U. S. 9 TAKEN BY U. 8. 268 (b) SHORT RANGE 12 DELIVERED TO PENNFIELD RIDGE 2 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 1 at Montreal 2 on special duty (Pan-Am. Training) at Detroit (transition) SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at end of report) 10 (SHORT RANGE) DELIVERED TO U. K. (by sea) (B) off Contract A-1748 (TOMO RANGE) 37 DELIVERED TO U. K. 9 DELIVERED TO SOUTH AFRICA 5 DELIVERED TO PENNFIELD RIDGE 1 in Iceland 6 on route South Africa 1 LOST AT SEA (in flights on route U.K.) 1 at Gander 3 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 2 at Montreal 1 GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 9 at Miami or West Palm Beach 11 at Mashville 5 at Detroit (including 4 for South Africa) 10 at Dallas 1 on special duty (Wright Field) 1 CRASHED IN U. S. (for South Africa) 27 DIVERTED TO U. S. NAVY 244 TAKEN BY U. S. A. A. F. 374 Page 2 November 4, 1942 U.S. 99 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT BRITISH REV. NO. D-55 MOST SECRET LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY REPORT NO. 76 (Covering Movements through November 3, 1942) 6. CONSOLIDATED FLYING BOATS (a) off B. As C. Contracts (n CATALINA I (PBX5) off Contract A-2587 7 DELIVERED TO U. K. (b) CATALINA I (28-5ME) off Contract F-210 38 DELIVERED TO U. K. 1 DELIVERED TO AUSTRALIA 1 DELIVERED TO SINGAPORE 40 (a) CATALINA I (28-5KE) off Contract A-37 42 DELIVERED TO U. K. 8 DELIVERED TO SINGAPORE 8 DELIVERED TO DARTMOUTH 1 DELIVERED TO BERNUDA (R.A.F.E.C. Establishment) 59 (d) CATALINA I (28-5MB) off Contract AUS-58 17 DELIVERED TO AUSTRALIA DELIVERED TO U. K. is (e) CATALINA IIA (28-500) off Contract CAN-78 17 DELIVERED TO U. K. 9 DELIVERED TO AUSTRALIA 1 DELIVERED TO BERMUDA (R.A.F.F.C. Establishment) 2 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 29 SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at and of report) 7 DELIVERED TO CANADA (B) off Lend-Lease Contracts B.S.O. Requisitions (n) CATALINA III (PBY5A) off B.S.G. Req. 10772 10 DELIVERED TO U. K. 2 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 12 (b) CATALINA IB (PBX5B) off B.S.C. Reg. 148 83 DELIVERED TO U. K. 2 at Gander 4 at Montreal 1 GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 11 at Elisabeth City 1 on special duty (on loan to U. S. Navy) damaged) 102 (c) CATALINA IB (PBX5B) off B.S.C. Reg. 7952 1 at Montreal 33 at Elisabeth City 34 7. LOCKEED HUDSONS OFF LEND-LEASE CONTRACTS (A) HUDSON IIIA (A29) off 10-5 130 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 3 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 2 at Montreal for Debert 2 at Ottawa 1 GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 1 at Detroit for Debert 1 at Nashville (transition) 3 under repair 1 at Long Beach 33 for China 20 DIVERTED TO U. S. NAVI 154 TAKEN BY U. S. A. A. F. 5 GRASHED IN U. S. 356 (not included in table at end of report) 49 DELIVERED TO AUSTRALIA (by sea) 12 DELIVERED TO NEW ZEALAND (by sea) 61 Page 3 November 4, 1942 U.S. SECRET 100 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT REF. NO. 1-55 BRITISH MOST SECRET LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY REPORT NO. 76 (Govering Movements through November 3, 1942) 7a LOCKHEED HUDSONS OFF LEND-LEASE CONTRACTS (B) MUDSON IIIA (A29) off IC-151 185 DELIVERED TO U. K. 1 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 4 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 5 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 7 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 1 at Detroit (transition) 2 at Nashville (1 in transition) 2 FOR CHIMA 1 TAKEN BY U. S. A. A. F. 3 CRASHED IN U. S. 211 SUPPLIMENTARY (not included in table at end or report) 45 DELIVERED TO AUSTRALIA (by sea) 42 DELIVERED TO NEW ZEALAND (by son) 1 CRASHED (on acceptance flight) 88 (c) HUDSON VI (A28A) off AC-A73 31 DELIVERED TO U. K. 42 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST 2 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 1 on route Middle East 6 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 5 at Mentreal (for Debest) 3 GRASHED AFTER EXPORT 2 for special duty (training) Pan-American) 2 CRASHED IN'U S. (Pan-Am. training) 1 TAKEN BY U. S. A. A. F. 95 SUPPLEMENTARY (not included in table at and of report) 4 DELIVERED TO NEW ZEALAND (by sea) (D) HUDSON VI off AO-908 85 DELIVERED TO U. K. 48 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST 26 DELIVERED TO FREETOWN 31 DELIVERED TO DEBERT 3 on route Middle East 5 on route Freetown 2 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 7 DELIVERED TO MONTREAL (Establishment) 2 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 7 at Detroit (4 in transition) 2 on route Detroit 24 at Miami or West Palm Beach 27 at Nashville or Memphis 1 at Dallas (transition) 11 at Long Beach (5 in transition) 5 CRASHED IN U. S. TAKEN BY U. S. 265 & DOUGLAS BOSTON IIIA (A20C) off L/L Contract AC-934 11 DELIVERED TO U. K. 2 on route U. K. from Mohtral (U.S. Air Transport Command Pilots) 7 at Gander 23 at Montreal 2 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT 56 at Detroit (2 in transition) 10 on route Detroit 21 at Long Beach 132 Page 4 November 4, 1942 101 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT BRITISH NO. D-55 MOST SECRET LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY REPORT NO. 76 (COVERING MOVEMENTS THROUGH November 3, 1942) 9. MARTIN BALTIMORETTIA (A30) off W/ Contract AC-19. B.S.C. Reg. 144 2 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST 1 en route Middle East 3 at Montreal 6 at Miami or West Palm Beach 71 at route Nashville or Memphis (including 2 returned from Montreal) 3 on Nashville or Memphis 42 at Newoastle, Del. 4 en special duty (tests by U.S.) 1 CRASHED IN U. S. 133 10. BOEING FORTRESS (817) (A) FORTRESS IIA (B17E) Army Release 42 DELIVERED TO U. K. (modified) 1 at Gender (modified) 1 at Montreal (modified) 1 on special duty (modified) 12 TAKEN BACK BY U. S. A. A. F. (in April) TAKEN BACK BY U. S. A. A. F. (in June) (a) FORTRESS II (BI7E) (n) OFF LEND-LEASE CONTRACT A--16 1 at Kontreal (modified) 4 at Detroit (modified) en route Detroit (modified) damaged) (b) ARMY RELEASE 4 at Montreal (modified) 2 at Detroit (modified) 13 3 at Cheyenne (modification center) on route Cheyeane (modification center) 11. CONSOLIDATED LIBERATOR III (324D) Army Release 11 DELIVERED TO U. K. (mmodified) 61 DELIVERED TO U. K. (modified) 1 LOST AT SEA (unmodified) (in flight) 4 in temporary South Atlantic Ferry Service (modified) 1 at Montreal (modified) 1 CRASHED AFTER EXPORT (modified) 22 at Fort Worth (modification center) 1 on route Fort Worth 3 TAKEN BACK BY U.S.A.A.F. (2 in Junes 1 in Sept.) 107 2 CRASHED IN U. S. (on route modification centers) 2. NORTH AMERICAN MITCHELL I (B25B) Aray Release 3 DELIVERED TO U. K. (modified) 5 at Montreal (modified); 1 for U.K. 4 to return to U.S. for remodification 2 at Nashville (re-modified) 13 at Minneapolis (for re-modification) 23 13. NORTH AMERICAN MITCHELL II (B250) Army Release 90 DELIVERED TO U. K. (modified) 1 LOST AT SEA (in flight) 1 at Gander (modified) 8 at Montreal for Canada training (modified) 12 at Detroit for Canada training (modified) 7 at Minneapolis (for further modification, S.B.A. installation) 3 at Kansas City (modification center) 37 TAKEN BACK BY U. S. A. A. F. (June) 29 TAKEN BACK BY U. S. A. A. F. (April) 188 Page 5 November 4, 1942 S S. CONFIDENTIAL REPORT BRITISH REF. NO. D-55 102 MOST SECRET LOCATIONS OF OCEANIC FLIGHT DELIVERY AIRCRAFT - WEEKLY REPORT NO. 76 (Covering Movements through November 3, 1942) 16. MARTIN MARAUDER I (B26A) Army Release 4 DELIVERED TO U. K. (modified) 1 at Montreal (modified) 44 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST (modified) 2 on route Middle East (modified) 6 CRASMED AFTER EXPORT (modified) (on route Middle East) 4 at Miami or West Pala Beach (modified) 3 at Mashville (modified) 1 under repair (Mobile) 6 GRASHED IN U. 8. 2 on route modification centery 4 after modification 71 15. TRANSPORTS (A) DOUGLAS (n) DAKOTA II (0-53) off B.S.C. Reg. 1050 9 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST TAKEN BY U. 8. 2 11 (b) DAKOTA I (0-17) off L/L Contract AC-53. B.S.O. Reg. 2849 1 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST (a) LOCKEFED LODESTAR OFF L/L Contract A0-53. B.S.O. Rec. 1019 (n) LODESTAR IA (C-59) 6 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST 1 ea route Middle East 3 TAKEN BY U. 3. A. A. 7. 10 (b) LODESTAR II (0-60) 15 DELIVERED TO MIDDLE EAST PLANNING AND AIRFRANK SUPPLY BRITISH AIR COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. PAGE 6 November 4, 1942 103 TREASURY DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE SPOREMENT November 6. 1948 Received this date from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for the confidential inform tion of the Secretary of the treasury, compile- sion for the week ended October 25, 1948, showing dollar disbursements out of the British Repire and Freach accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the means by which these expenditures were financed. (Init) E.m.B. imc:11/6/42 104 C 0 P Y FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK November 5, 1942 CONFIDENTIAL Dear Mr. Secretary: Attention: Mr. H. D. White I am enclosing our compilation for the week ended October 28, 1942, showing dollar disbursements out of the British Empire and French accounts at this bank and the means by which these expenditures were financed. Faithfully yours, /s/ Robert G. Rouse Robert G. Rouse, Vice President. The Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, Washington, D. C. Enclosure Copy;imc:11/6/42 ANALYSIS OF BRITISH AND FRENCH ACCOUNT (In Millions of Dollars) BANK OF ENGLAND (BRITISH COVERAGE DEBITS Total Debits PERIOD First year of ware Gov't Expendi- tures(a) 1.793,2 605.6 December, 1940 2,792.3 Second year of wars 2,203.0 1,425.6 1,792.2 904.8 War period through Third year of ware 235.6 CREDI TS Sales of Securities Other Total Debits (Micial)(b) Credits Gold 1,187.6 52.0 828.211.356.1 2,109.5 210.82.189.8 14193.2 21.8 330.81.361.5 Oct. 1 - Oct. 28 Oct. 29 - Dec. 2 Dec. 3 Dec. 30 56.1 46.7 37.1 27.4 19.0 Other Credits(c) 10.8 276.0 575.6 722.1 - 13,2 5.5 1,334.2 0.5 108.0 57.5 7 2.5 21 28 11.5 7,3 7.3 14.0 3.2 10.3 Average Weekly Expenditures Since Outbreak of War France (through June 19, 1940) 129.6 million England (through June 19, 1940) 27.6 million England (since June 19, 1940 33.9 million 8 Pundo(d) 35.0 NEEK ENDED: 14 (+) or Decr. (-) 420ml 81.6 19.3 BANK OF DEBITS lot Incr. Proceeds of Total Gov't Expendi- tures (e) 866.36 416.6(f) Debits CREDITS Proceeds Other Total of Gold Debits Credits Sales 449.7 421.4 456.9 38.9 4.8 8.8 +125.9 18.5 - 34.1 18.5 81.1 +25.5 10.1 - 10.1 0.4 57.5 t..10.9 1942 Sept. 3 - Sept. 30 Wook Ended October 28. 1942 14.5 14.6 -7.0 18.0 +6.5 10.3(d 878.3 1,098.4 4.4 900.2 Credits 1952569 900.2 198.2 +220.1 8.8 4.4 -30.1 - - 0.3 0.4 0.3 9.7 t 0.3 +01 +3.0 Week ended October 28 1942 Cumulation from July 6, 1940 - 14.1 +01 0.1 +8.3 0.1 0.1 Transfers from British Purchasing Commission to Bank of Canada for French Account *For monthly breakdown see tabulationaprior to April 23, 1941 eeFor monthly breakdown see tabulationsprior to October 8, 1941. ...For monthly breakdown see tabulations prior to October 14, 1942. (See attached sheet for other footnotes) Other Net Inor. (+) or Deer. (-) in $ Funds (d) 229.0 162.7 million million + 0.1 (a) Includes payments for account of British Purchasing Commission, British Air Ministry, British Supply Boardy Ministry of Supply Timber Control, and Ministry of Shipping. (b) Estimated figures based on transfers from the New York Agency of the Bank of MontreAl, which apparently represent the proceeds of official British sales of American securi ties, including those effected through direct negotiation. In addition to the official selling, substantial liquidation of securities for private British account occurred, particularly during the early months of the war, although the receipt of the proceeds at this Bank cannot be identified with any accuracy. According to data supplied by the British Treasury and released by Secretary Morgenthau, total official and private British liquidation of our securities through December, 1940 amounted to $334 million. (c) Includes about $85 million received during October, 1939 from the accounts of British authorised banks with New York banks, presumably reflecting the requisitioning of private dollar balances. Other large transfers from such accounts since October, 1939 apparently represent the acquisition of proceeds of exports from the sterling area and other currently accruing dollar receipts. (d) Reflects changes in all dollar holdings payable on demand or maturing in one year. (e) Includes payments for account of French Air Commission and French Purchasing Commission. (f) Adjusted to eliminate the effect of $20 million paid out on June 26, 1940 and returned the following day. (g) Includes: 63.1 million to be held for credit of U. S. armed forces abroad 2.9 million deposited by British Ministry of Supply. LISTS OF CANADIAN AND AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTS (In Millions of Dollars) OF CANADI (and Canadian Government Transfers Proceeds to official Total Debits PERIOD First year of wart British A/C 323.0 16.6 December, 1940 477.2 16.6 Second year of warts 460.4 525.8 of Other Debits 306.4 DI 1563 Transfers Transfers from Official British A/C Net Incr. (+) or Decr. (-) Total Gold Credits Sales A/C 504.7 612.7 20.9 38.7 32.4 + 181.7 20.9 3.4 7.7 110.7 41.0 88.5 360.0 230.2 For Own 460.6 707.4 534.8 - 460.4 462.0 246.2 0.3 525.5 566.3 198.6 46.3 53.6 51.5 13.2 For French Other Credits A/C War period through Third year of war COMPONE The BAND OF AUSTRALIA 123.9 - to Total Dabita Official British A/C ⑉00 Net Inor. Proomeds of Other Total Debita Credit 27.3 36.1 Gold Other Sales Credits 30.0 6.1 46.3 Oct. 29 Dec. 2 LEPA Oct. Oct. 28 - - 41.9 lare - - - 4.9 4.5 3.9 57.9 72.2 14.5 43.4 62.4 1.6 16.7 $5.5 81.2 62.9 18.3 40.5 107.2 57.4 49.8 112.2 17.2 95.0 -5.0 40.4 7.3 28.0 20.5 7.5 18.1 18.1 34.9 14.3 12.0 -99 Cat 2.3 14.6 50.1 12.3 1942 Sept. 3- Sept. 30 () or Decr. (-) 31.2 . BANK + DEBTTE Strietty Work Ended October 28, 1942 - - 17.5 90 +03 Dec. Dec. 30 MEEK ENDED: 8.2 14 25 20.1 B.O 11.0 16.6 3.0 0.9 ... 11.8 4.9 0.9 11.9 0.1 7.7GT 7.7 12.04E 3.2 8.3(ci 2.2 35 3.0 0.6 1.9 1.9 0.3 10.7 10.2 12.0 10.9 12.0 1.3 9.9 12.0 2.0(d Weekly Average of Total Debits Since Outbreak of War Through 1972 8 8.4 million *For monthly breakdown see tabulations prior to April 23, 1941. ++For monthly breakdown see tabulations prior to October 8, 1941. +++For monthly breakdown see tabulations prior to October 14, 1942. (a)Reflects changes in all dollar holdings payable on demand or sturing in one year. (c)Incluses S. bill proceeds of u.s. Government checks deposited by WAR Supplies, Ltd. (1)Includes 1.0 million credited to Australia for accestriti of Treasurer of the United States plie Against S. currence and Treasury checks negotiated. m 108 NOT TO BE RE-TRANSMITTED COPY NO. 13 BITISH MOST SECRET U.S. SECRET OPTIL No. 383 Information received up to 7 A.M., 6th November, 1942. 1. MILITARY EGYPT. 4th. Throughout the day there WALL FL steady advance in the Northern sector opposed by a gradually thinning screen of guns and tanks behind hich the enemy continued to withdraw. 4th/5th. Our armoured and infantry forces advanced rapidly, and by first light 5th had reached the railway vest of EL DABA Station and were within ten miles of FUKA. 5th. By the evening the German Afrika Corps appeared to be making a stand on the general line of the escarpment southwest of FUKA, our troops consisting of U.K. and South African Armoured Car Regiments, U.K. Armoured Forma- tions and Second New Zealand Division, being then engaged in fighting in that area At least 5,000 prisoners were captured during the day together with much equipment. MADAGASCAR. 4th. In the afternoon our forward troops made contact with French troops about 12 miles north of AMBALAZAO. Road blocks continue to delay the advance. RUSSIA. In the TEREK sector, German forces are pushing eastwards from ALAGIR towards ORDJONIKIDZE against stubborn Russian resistance. 2. AIR OPERATIONS WESTERN FRONT. 4th. Four Typhoons attacked and damaged a small coaster off the Dutch Coast. 7 enemy aircraft crossed our coasts. One shot down. EGYPT. 4th. United States Liberators bombed BENGHAZI HARBOUR. Our light bombers and fighters in 700 sorties inflicted heavy casualties on the enemy withdrawing along the FUKA Road. Enemy air casualties 13,2, 7. Ours, 12 Fighters, nil, nil. 4th/5th. Our aircraft continuously attacked the retreating enen RUSSIA. 3rd. German aircraft bombed TUAPSE Herbour and on Lake LADOGA sank a ship and some tugs and barges. 109 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE Nov. 6,1942 TO FROM Secretary Morgenthau Mr. Hoflich Subject: Bombing Raids over Western Europe during October, 1942 1. During October, the U.S. Army Air Force raided occupied Europe three times, attacking military objectives in six cities. The largest raid was made on a locomotive factory at Lille by 108 Fortresses and Liberators. In this raid, four bombers were lost, but the Americans claim to have destroyed 48 enemy planes and damaged many more. Altogether, seven planes were lost during the month. 2. The R.A.F. raided Europe 28 times during the month with a loss of 90 bombers. The largest daylight raid was on the Schneider works at Le Creusot. In 6-1/2 minutes 88 bombers dropped 153 tons of explosives. Only one bomber was lost. 3. The largest night raids were over Cologne (289 planes, 18 lost) and Kiel (288 planes, 9 lost). 4. For the first time since April 1942, the R.A.F. bombed Northern Italy. The largest raid was made by 112 Lancasters on Genoa. One hundred eighty tons of explosives were dropped. -2- 110 Bombing Raids over Western Europe during October R.A.F. I. Raids over Western Europe reported during October. II. Bomber losses in raids over Western Europe. I.S.A.A.F. 28 31 3 90 Total 97 7 III. Cities reported attacked. A. Germany Aachen: Various industrial objectives Bremen: Aircraft, submarine, ship and 1 1 oil production; port and rail center Cologne: Iron and steel, tanks, engines, rubber, explosives 2 2 1 1 Enden: Port, submarine production Essen: Munitions, synthetic oil 2 2 3 3 Flensburg: Submarine and shipbuilding Hanover: Synthetic oil, rubber plant, port 2 2 1 Herrenwyk: Submarine production 2 2 1 Krefeld: Heavy industry center Kiel: Port, shipyards, submarine produc- Ognabruck: Rail center, metallurgy Saarbrucken: Rail center, iron and steel Wilhelmshaven: Submarine and shipbuilding, naval base 1 Norden: Industry 1 Munster: Rail and industrial center 1 1 tion 1 1 Lingen: Various objectives Lubeck: Baltic port, submarine produc- 1 1 1 tion 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 Wismar: Aircraft works 2 2 Total reported attacks on German cities during October. B. Italy 27 0 27 Genoa: Harbor, warship construction, munitions 2 2 Milan: Aircraft production Savona: Turin: Arsenal aircraft works 2 2 1 1 Total reported attacks on Italy during October. 0 5 5 -3- 111 R.A.F. U.S.A.F.F. Total III. Cities reported attacked (cont'd.) C. Occupied Areas Cherbourg: Port, airfield, shipbuilding Hengelo: station Diesel engines, power Le Creusot: Munitions, power plant Leeuwarden: Aerodrome Liege: Munitions, iron and steel Lille: Locomotive works, oil refineries 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 Lorient: Submarine base 1 1 1 1 Meaulte: Airframe factory Sluiskil: Chemical works 2 1 Havre: Port, shipyards 1 1 machine works 1 1 Ghent: Iron,copper,oil and 1 Den Helder: Docks 1 2 2 St. Omer: Aerodrome, railroads 1 1 Total reported attacks on cities in Occupied areas during October 14 6 20 Total reported attacks on Western European cities during October. 46 6 52 112 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE Nov.6,1942 TO FROM Secretary Morgenthau Mr. Hoflich Subject: British Offensive in Egypt 1. Tank Losses A. Axis (U.S. Military Intelligence Service, November 6,1942) During the present British offensive in Egypt, the Axis forces have lost approximately 500 tanks. This leaves them with about 80 tanks of all types. Axis tank strength before the beginning of the present British offensive was estimated as follows: German medium Italian medium Italian light 275 290 15 Total 580 B. British (U.S. Military Intelligence Service, November 6, 1942) During the present action about 222 U.S. medium tanks had been put out of action by November 4, leaving the British with about 300 tanks of this type. The losses of other types have not been reported. of the U.S. medium tanks put out of action, only about 10 percent, or 52 tanks, are considered to be permanently lost. Ninety percent, or about 170, are believed to be repairable. British tank strength, before the beginning of the present offensive, was estimated as follows: U.S. medium U.S. light British medium British infantry Total U.S.medium damaged but repairable Grand Total 522 125 180 140 967 230 1,197 -2- 113 2. Plane Losses A. Axis 1. According to United Nations, British, and United States communiques: A United Nations communique of November 4 stated that over 300 Axis aircraft had been destroyed or damaged in the air, and the same number destroyed or put out of action on the ground, during the present British offensive. It is estimated, from other British and American communiques, that at least 182 Axis planes have been destroyed. If this number is deducted from the 600 mentioned above as destroyed and damaged, it leaves approximately 418 damaged. 2. According to German and Italian communiques: From German and Italian sources came the announcement of nine planes lost in Egypt from October 24 to November 3. B. British 1. According to United Nations communiques, 75 British planes have been lost during the present offensive. No American plane losses have been announced. 2. German and Italian communiques have announced the destruction of 121 British planes during the period October 24 - November 3, 1942. 3. Artillery Military Intelligence information indicates that the British forces had 100 -105mm. gune in Egypt at the beginning of the present offensive. It was announced in a United Nations communique of November 4 that 270 Axis guns had been captured or destroyed up to that time, during the present offensive. 4. Prisoners The British claim to have captured 13,000 Axis prisoners during the present offensive to November 6. (British communique) Military Intelligence has no information on plane losses during the present offensive in Egypt and no recent estimates of relative plane strength in that area, except that the British have superiority in the air. 114 INTELLIGENCE REPORT 48 11-6-42 CONFIDENTIAL OFFICE WAR INFORMATION BUREAU COPY Henry No. Morgenthau, CONTENTS Page EDITORIAL ATTITUDES 1 Election 1 Battle Fronts 1 Squeeze 3 DEVELOPING SITUATIONS Hostility Toward Labor Ignorance of Price Control Confidence in Price Control Personal Identification with the War ENEMY PROPAGANDA The Japs and Navy Day Berlin and Rome Willkie's Speech 4 4 8 11 12 14 14 15 16 EDITORIAL ATTITUDES ELECTION Editors turned aside from the war this week to discuss the congressional and gubernatorial elections. In volume of comment, these contests took precedence over all other topics. Much of the interest, however, seemed more formal than fervent. With the exception of a few vehemently isolationist newspapers, both Republican and Democratic commentators refrained from discussing basic is- sues. For the most part, they confined their arguments to the merits of specific candidates, conventional criticism of the Administration and the need for a two-party system in a democracy. Great stress was placed on the importance of voting at a time when democratic liberties are in danger. BATTLE FRONTS Press and radio found cheer in the news of allied gains against Rommel in North Africa. All of those who interpreted the progress of the battle agreed that the British had won the first round. But they were exceedingly cautious in forecasting the final decision. The offensive was represented as long-planned and well-equipped; a number of commentators stressed the point that the allies now possess numerical superiority on the ground and dominance of the air over North Africa. Evidently, however, their respect for Rommel is so great as to make them guarded in the expression of optimism. The Chicago Daily News, in a fairly typical comment, ventured the statement that "The African see-saw has been going a long time, but this may be the last act. There is every indication that the United Nations are striking in sufficient force to make it so." Behind such cautious observations, long-range hopes and speculations were commentators came to the conclusion that American difficulties there resulted from an absence of unified command. They agreed with the Omaha occasionally expressed, generally in conditional clauses. If the African World Herald that, against the skillful Japanese, "America has pitted an offensive should succeed, a number of commentators suggested, a second Army and Navy often divided by jealousy, always divided in command." front against the Axis might be opened through an invasion of Italy. A number of observers went beyond this general indictment, charging speci- The fighting in Russia was comparatively neglected by the news analysts. fically that disunity in the South Pacific stemmed from political consider- They rejoiced in the continued resistance of Stalingrad, but noted that ations responsible for denying overall authority to General MacArthur. The the Red army has been unable to expel the invaders from the city and that Atlanta Constitution, for example, said that "There has been little to ex- Nasi gains continued steadily toward the Grosny oil fields. cuse the machinations that have kept the greatest military leader of the Chief editorial concern centered, naturally, around the fighting in the United States from a role in the war which would give him scope to exercise his talent." Solomons. Uneasiness over developments in the South Pacific gave way at the turn of the week to sudden jubilance at news of the withdrawal of the Japanese fleet. The Philadelphia Record called this "the most significant American naval victory since Midway." But most comment warned that the Japanese would return and that the fate of the Solomons still hangs in the The newspapers most bitterly opposed to the Administration are once more tak- ing up MacArthur's cause, twisting his denial of political aspirations into proof that he was politically persecuted. "The circumstances," declared the Chicago Tribune, "all suggest that political considerations had ham- strung our ablest military leader because his popularity and the faith he balance. commanded among the American people were resented If the strings have In one respect, all commentators felt better satisfied about the Pacific been loosened so that MacArthur's airmen can help to save the beleaguered situation. They accepted the prompt announcement of our loss of an air- garrison on Quadalcanal, it is at the price of a quitclaim on his future, craft carrier as indicative of a change in Navy news policy and applauded which would have been in the hands of his fellow citizens in any event, Elmer Davis as primarily responsible for the improvement. The New York and not in his own." The Hearst papers, along with others, are booming Post called it "the Navy's best stroke of propaganda to date. It means MacArthur for supreme military command of the entire American war effort. the Navy realizes at last that we don't need coddling." Like the Post, a good many newspapers felt that "the Navy should have named the carrier, too." In assessing the development of events around the Solomons, a great many -2 SQUEEZE It is no overstatement to say that American newspapers were displeased with the executive action placing a $25,000 limitation on individual salaries. mood to make distinctions between what is and what is not an essential war The more temperate commentators agreed with the New York Times that "The industry. Strikes in any field provoke resentment against the strikers. new ruling represents a clear example of administrative action to circumvent In a labor dispute in Arizona, a number of big grocery concerns threatened the will of Congress." Generally, it was pointed out that the measure has to close rather than meet union demands. In effect, they threatened to little, if any, validity in controlling inflation or raising revenue. The strike. Nevertheless, public indignation was directed, not at them, but at less restrained critics fulminated about Communism and Sovietisation of the the unions. United States. Irritation about strikes is by no means confined to the areas where they DEVELOPING SITUATIONS HOSTILITY TOWARD LABOR occur. In Oklahoma, Texas and Florida, where strikes are notably infrequent, people believe that strikes are common everywhere also. The facts about the low incidence of strikes are not generally known. Hostility toward industrial workers is growing throughout the nation, even among groups which have not until re- In the present climate of opinion the public may be particularly receptive cently been unsympathetic to labor. Reports from OWI field offices to the to the charges of Pegler and other labor baiters about union "shake downs," Bureau of Intelligence indicate that anti-labor sentiment is rising, not racketeering and high initiation and membership fees. Many people feel only among farmers, business and professional people, but also among teachers, that unions and labor leaders are getting rich out of the war effort. office employees, retail salespeople and other white collar workers. A production-onscious public is also irked because it feels that labor Generally speaking, the wages of people in these groups have not kept pace is not exerting itself to the utmost. It reacts angrily to reports that with the rising cost of living. Naturally, they are envious of the appar- workers are guilty of slow-downs, are unwilling to put in overtime, and ent prosperity of war workers. When they read about workers demanding fur- are frequently absent from their jobs. It is largely unsware that alow- ther wage increases, and justifying these demande by pointing out that prices downs sometimes result from raw material shortages and managerial in have gone up, they see red. They are inclined to blame workers for the efficiency. price rises already experienced. They are especially antagonistic toward the wage demands of workers who are already earning $1 or $1.25 an hour. Some of the antagonism felt toward labor spills over against the Administration, People who are in a mood to believe accusations made against All strikes, or threats to strike, are now bitterly resented. Strikes in unions and labor leaders wonder why the Administration permits such war plants are considered almost treasonable. But people are not in a conditions to continue. There is widespread skepticism about the firmness the Administration will display in cracking down on further wage increases. Workers face a growing number of restrictions. They can no longer seek In some quarters the President is regarded as a captive of organized labor. higher wages; indeed, there is mounting agitation for reducing wages through Workers are well aware of the feeling against them. Following a series of articles in a Seattle newspaper about alleged labor abuses at the shipyards, many workmen from the yards stopped wearing their badges and helmets on the street. the abolition of the 40-hour week. Their right to seek better jobs or to move from place to place may be severely restricted, as it already has been in one or two industries. With their opportunities for economic advancement curtailed, the satisfac- But workers do not feel conciliatory: they are inclined to return the hostility directed against them with interest. They 'believe that they are being deliberately gouged by landlords and storekeepers. As one individual put it, "Whenever the working man gets a five per cent increase in pay, they'11 polish up all the old ways and invent a hundred new ways of getting it back." tion of workers will depend far more than it has in the past on working, living and community conditions. If, on top of the sacrifices they are making in connection with their jobs, they feel discontented with housing, transportation, health and recreational facilities, their spirit, productivity and willingness to accept continued controls are bound to be inpaired. If, in addition, they believe themselves despised in their communi- ties, they will feel like pariahs, rather than vital participants in a Workers believe that they are entitled "for once" to earn good money. In common enterprise. most cases they are working long hours under intense pressure. In many war centers they are living under almost intolerable conditions. Under the circumstances, their own tempers are often short. The cleavage between workers and the general public seriously endangers the entire home-front war effort. The most vigorous efforts are indicated to renedy the group consciousness and antagonism which are developing. Whatever the public may think, workers and the labor press do not feel that they can relax and depend upon the Administration to defend their interests. Although they have great personal affection for the President, they do not feel that the Government agencies with which they now have most to do - the WPB, the Army, the Navy and the Manpower Commission - are on their side. They believe they are entitled to greater representation in these bodies. Be- The public needs to be informed - in positive, not defensive terms about the patriotism of labor and the contribution it is making to the war effort. It is necessary, also, to give people a sympathetic understanding of the problems workers face and of the conditions under which they are living. Erroneous notions are prevalent about the extent to which the real standard of living of workers has improved. cause they have surrendered many of their basic rights, including the right to strike, they feel that it is necessary to be vigilant and aggressive. -6- A great deal can also be accomplished through local efforts to integrate workers more fully into the everyday life of their communities. There is a particular need to erase the line of demarcation in war centers between The 58 per cent who knew (or guessed) the correct definition of a price newly-arrived war workers and the established residents. Sympathy between ceiling were then shown three statements, one of them true, respecting war workers and the general public is essential to national unity. the way in which it operates. An additional eight per cent betrayed their GNORANCE OF PRICE CONTROL A study conducted in the early part of August for OPA officials by Crossley, Incorporated, on behalf of the Bureau of Intelligence revealed extremely widespread ignorance of the nature and application of the Government's price control program. Interviewing in Indianapolis, Indiana, a city of ignorance on this test. Thus, only half the people interviewed in Indianapolis revealed any real knowledge of the nature of a ceiling price. Scarcely more than one-third of the lowest income groups possessed such knowledge. Women, who do most of the shopping for the ordinary family, were found to know less about ceiling prices than men. 400,000 in which the cost of living has been rising somewhat faster than Additional questioning revealed that many of the people who possessed the average for American cities of comparable size, showed that nine out this rudimentary knowledge about ceiling prices were not aware that these of ten people there believed that the Government should control prices. prices may vary in different stores. Only 27 per cent of the whole sample Only eight out of ten people, however, were aware that Government regulation of prices was in effect. knew what a ceiling price is and how it applies to the different stores in Ignorance that a price control program was in operation was greater among which they trade. The lowest income groups almost wholly lacked this knowledge. Only 13 per cent of them were able to answer all of these questions correctly. Among women of all economic levels, only 23 per cent, as com- women than among men and considerably more prevalent among the lower income pared with 31 per cent of the men, passed all these tests. groups than among the well-to-do or those of average economic status. One out of three persons on the lowest rungs of the economic ladder did not All of the people who knew what a ceiling price was (58 per cent of the know that there was any Government regulation of prices. And these are whole sample) were also asked if they thought that ceiling prices had been the people, obviously, to whom price control is of the greatest importance. set on most of the things, all of the things or only a few of the things that can be bought today. Only 28 per cent understood that price control All of the people interviewed were asked, "What is a ceiling price?" They were shown four definitions of a ceiling price, among which a correct definition was included. Only 58 per cent of the whole sample selected the correct definition. was applicable to most consumer goods. These questions embrace the elementary facts about price control. No more than 14 per cent of the whole sample interviewed were able to answer all of them correctly. The following chart presents a cumulative index to knowledge and ignorance about the price control program. CUMULATIVE INDEX TO KNOWLEDGE AND IGNORANCE ABOUT PRICE CONTROL Knows difKnows price control exists, and ferent stores Knows what celling price is, and have different ceiling prices. and Knows ceiling price applies to most goods 14% 24% 44% Accumulated knowledge about price control 80% 86% 76% 56% Accumulated Ignorance about price control 20% It seems especially significant that information on this subject was rarest among the people who need it most - women and low-income families. Appar- ently, a great majority of the public is not buying intelligently - or even knowlingly - within the price control program. People do not learn the facts about price control as they ultimately learn the facts about rationing or most other Government programs - through ex- perience and participation. Price control, unlike most other programs, has no educative effect in the process of its operations. And the bulk of the public apparently has not yet learned much about it from the press and radio. A separate study, conducted by the Bureau of Intelligence in August on a nationwide basis, showed that fewer than one-third of the people then - 10 - expressed full satisfaction with the manner in which the price control program had operated to keep prices in line; half the public expressed either partial or outright dissatisfaction with the way the program had worked. Apparently, therefore, whether or not people have a clear understanding of this program, they pass judgment on it anyway. And this judgment is likely to affect their satisfaction with the Government's efforts respecting economic problems in general. It may even affect their confidence in the future ability of the Government to take adequate measures for the control of living costs. CONFIDENCE IN PRICE CONTROL More recent interviewing conducted by the Bureau of Intelligence indicates that the confidence of the American people in the Government's ability to keep the cost of living under control has waned rather markedly. At the end of June, six weeks after the President's seven-point antiinflation program went into operation, about three-fourths of the public expressed a belief that it would serve effectively to curb prices in the future. In the early part of October, however, only two-thirds expressed such faith. The Bureau posed the following question to representative cross sections of four occupational groups -- white collar workers, small business proprietors, labor and farmers: "Do you think the Government will actually be able to control prices?" The table on the following page shows the percentages in each group answering this question affirmatively in April, June and October. - 11 - April June October White collar workers 73% 78% 66% Small business proprietors 71% 75% 64% 78% 86% 66% 70% 73% 59% Labor Farmer Farmers have been consistently lower in confidence about the operation of price control than any of the other major occupational groups. Labor was, in the early stages of the program, the most optimistic, but its faith has now diminished so that it is about on the same level as that of white collar workers and small business proprietors. This decrease in confidence respecting the Government's ability to control prices does not, in any sense, of course, measure the actual effectiveness with which price control is operating. It stems, perhaps, from the existing widespread ignorance of the program's operation. People unaware of its scope may have been misled into thinking that it was operating ineffectively because they observed that prices were rising on articles, such as food products, which were not until recently covered by OPA regulations. - Public confidence in the Government's ability on this score may not be es- sential to effective application of the price control program. The program does not require the cooperation of the average citizen. But lack of confidence on this score may lead to general public distrust of the Government's vigor and efficiency. PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION WITH THE WAR The nation's full strength can be mobilized only if its citizens regard the - 12 - war as their war. The extent to which they accept the war as their own may be measured by the degree of support they give to the war effort and the de- gree of concern they feel about the fighting. Two-thirds of the people interviewed in a recent field study were judged to be vigorous supporters. Most of the rest gave the war some degree of support. Only three per cent were opposed to the national cause. More than half of those interviewed were rated as being deeply concerned about the war. Only eight per cent appeared to be entirely unconcerned. People who earn less than $1800 a year and have less than a high school edu- cation are less likely to feel closely identified with the war effort than those who are more favorably situated. People whose contacts with others are relatively frequent were found to be more deeply identified than the compara- tively isolated. Among the mental attitudes which usually accompany a sense of identification, four are conspicuous. Those who support the war and manifest anxiety about it tend to have definite convictions about the nature, course and objectives of the struggle. Frequently, they have concrete expectations about the postwar world, and feel confident that these can be achieved. They are more likely than the relatively lukewarm supporters of the war to identify strongly with America's allies or to think in broad international terms. Finally, in many cases they have been stirred to real anger by the actions or attributes of the enemy. As compared with the number of people who whole-heartedly support the war, - 13 - relatively few feel that they are contributing importantly to winning it. War work is far more potent than anything else in arousing a feeling of participation. People do not appear to be greatly interested in whether their participation in wartime programs is governed by voluntary or compulsory procedures. They ask two questions which cut across the voluntary versus compulsory contro- versy: Is any given program necessary? Is it so administered as to insure equality of sacrifice? (These findings summarize a Special Report, "Personal Identification with the War," issued by the Bureau of Intelligence, the Bureau.) October 28, and available to authorised individuals on request to ENEMY PROPAGANDA H THE JAPS AND NAVY DAY Japanese propagandists made America's Navy Day the occa- sion for an all-out short-wave attack on the U.S. Navy. Tokyo claims an overwhelming Japanese victory in the Solomon Islands battle. It uses these claims, Ghormley's removal, and U. S. admissions of sinkings to prove the weakness of the American fleet. Japan utilizes this alleged weakness to attack America's military and political leadership. "Repeated failures" and growing popular dissatisfaction are cited as the reasons for Ghormley's removal. It is maintained that the United States admitted its losses in the Solomons battle only as the result of "popular pressure," and that important losses still remain undisclosed. President Roosevelt is charged with being responsibile for the situation - 14 - and the only obstacle to peace with Japan. In its "Lights from the East" program, Tokyo says, "Thousands now are already injured or dead. Then comes a showdown with Roosevelt and an era of peace with Japan. Roosevelt's America has failed." In keeping with this appeal to defeatists and isolationists, Japan borrows a trick from the Nazis and attempts to prove her impregnability. Not only is an offensive against Japan impossible, according to Tokyo, but Hawaii and the East Coast have been jeopardized by recent "American reverses" and com- munications with Australia and South America are already cut. At the same time that Japan is attempting to persuade the United States and the rest of the world of her strength, however, monitoring of her domestic broadcasts reveals that she is warning her own people against over-confidence. Although recent battles are interpreted as victories, losses are admitted and the people are warned of coming U. S. attacks. BERLIN AND ROME Japan's European allies also waxed derisive and ironical over America's Navy Day. Perhaps because of a lack of suitable German victories to stress, the Nasis put a great deal of emphasis upon recent Japanese "successes" in their domestic broadcasts. Probably because of the deep concern the German people feel about the Russian campaign, the Nasis devote far more attention to it in domestic propaganda than in broadcasts to North America. Increasing emphasis is put on the Caucasus offensive and decreasing attention given to Stalingrad. - 15 - Britain's offensive in Egypt is treated in a reserved manner by both Berlin and Rome. Although the official attitude is one of "calm confidence," admissions of British strength and advances have been made to both foreign and domestic audiences. Such ambitious objectives are attributed to the offensive, however, that even if it makes considerable headway, it can still be treated by the Axis as a failure. According to Berlin, one of the purposes of the campaign is to pave the way for attacks on Italy. Significantly, Rome omits references to this objective in its domestic broadcasts. WILLKIE'S SPEECH The Axis, following its usual procedure with any important statement, exploited the Willkie speech in both domestic and short-wave broadcasts. Both Germany and Italy found it highly useful in their present efforts to persuade their people that America's production program is failing and that the United Nations are split by quarrels. Axis propagandists also wrung ammunition from the speech for their unre- lenting efforts to create discord among the United Nations. Willkie's pronouncements were made official by characterising him as "Roosevelt's right-hand man." The Nazis then proceeded to tell England that the speech was the President's way of warning her that she may get less lend-lease supplies in the future. According to Goebbels, the speech also revealed that the U. S. is attempting to supercede British authority in India. Lord Haw-Haw tried to show that, by demanding a second front, Willkie was snubbing Alexander's Egyptian offensive. 16 - In broadcasts to the Near and Middle East, Rome quoted Willkie as saying that U. S. silence on the Indian problem had "alienated the Indians." The Nazis beamed judicious selections of the speech to South America. In slightly distorted form some of Willkie's statements were also fed back to America, to foment dissatisfaction with the Administration. - 17 - Britain's offensive in Egypt is treated in a reserved manner by both Berlin and Rome. Although the official attitude is one of "calm confidence," admissions of British strength and advances have been made to both foreign and domestic audiences. Such ambitious objectives are attributed to the offensive, however, that even if it makes considerable headway, it can still be treated by the Axis as a failure. According to Berlin, one of the purposes of the campaign is to pave the way for attacks on Italy. Significantly, Rome omits references to this objective in its domestic broadcasts. WILLKIE'S SPEECH The Axis, following its usual procedure with any important statement, exploited the Willkie speech in both domestic and short-wave broadcasts. Both Germany and Italy found it highly useful in their present efforts to persuade their people that America's production program is failing and that the United Nations are split by quarrels. Axis propagandists also wrung ammunition from the speech for their unre- lenting efforts to create discord among the United Nations. Willkie's pronouncements were made official by characterizing him as "Roosevelt's right-hand man." The Nasis then proceeded to tell England that the speech was the President's way of warning her that she may get less lend-lease supplies in the future. According to Goebbels, the speech also revealed that the U. S. is attempting to supercede British authority in India. Lord Haw-Haw tried to show that, by demanding a second front, Willkie was snubbing Alexander's Egyptian offensive. - 16 - In broadcasts to the Near and Middle East, Rome quoted Willkie as saying that U. S. silence on the Indian problem had "alienated the Indians." The Nazis beamed judicious selections of the speech to South America. In slightly distorted form some of Willkie's statements were also fed back to America, to foment dissatisfaction with the Administration. - 17 - 115 November 7, 1942 9:56 a.m. Harold Graves: Good morning. HMJr: Now I'm meeting with Eccles at my house tomorrow G: HMJr: G: HMJr: afternoon Yes, sir. ....and we're going over this whole question of this campaign. Yes, sir. I can't remember if I've made any promises or statements to you, but I want to refresh my memory. G: Yes. HMJr: He wants to set up a lot of new offices - state G: Yes. HMJr: offices, you see and wants these men to be paid, and I think that - I know he stayed a long time and had a talk with Bell. G: Yes. HMJr: I think you better get together with Bell G: Yes. if there's anything that you want to say HMJr: ....80 to me between now and four o'clock Sunday, you'd G: better say it. I'd better say it before noon today, hadn't I? HMJr: Yup. G: Yes, sir, I'11 be - I'11 do that right away. HMJr: will you do that? 115 November 7, 1942 9:56 a.m. Harold Graves: Good morning. HMJr: Now I'm meeting with Eccles at my house tomorrow G: HMJr: G: HMJr: afternoon Yes, sir. .... and we're going over this whole question of this campaign. Yes, sir. I can't remember if I've made any promises or statements to you, but I want to refresh my memory. G: Yes. HMJr: He wants to set up a lot of new offices - state G: Yes. HMJr: offices, you see and wants these men to be paid, and I think that - I know he stayed a long time and had a talk with Bell. G: Yes. HMJr: I think you better get together with Bell G: HMJr: G: Yes. ....80 if there's anything that you want to say to me between now and four o'clock Sunday, you'd better say it. I'd better say it before noon today, hadn't I? HMJr: Yup. G: Yes, sir, I'll be - I'11 do that right away. HMJr: Will you do that? -2G: Yes, sir. HMJr: Right. G: Goodbye. HMJr: Thank you. 116 117 TREASURY DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON November 7, 1942. MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY: RE: Your meeting tomorrow with Mr. Eccles. I talked briefly with Mr. Bell regarding Mr. Eccles's plan to establish Victory Fund Committee offices at various places throughout the Country with paid staffs. Mr. Bell told me that he was not sure what Mr. Eccles had in mind, but said that Mr. Eccles had used the city of Provo, Utah, to illustrate his point--that is, to illustrate the necessity for local offices with paid staffs. Provo, Utah, has a population of about 18,000. There are about 500 places in the United States larger than Provo, so I think that Mr. Eccles must have in mind a very widespread and elaborate organization for the Country as a whole. Contrasted with this, the War Savings Staff now has a headquarters office in each of the 48 States, with district or local offices at about 30 additional cities, these latter being mainly staffed by volunteers. I believe: (1) That it would be disastrous to the War Savings Staff to parallel that organization in the various States by a professional Government bond-selling organization, such as is evidently contemplated by Mr. Eccles; and that (2) Quite apart from the effect of any such plan on the War Savings Staff, it is questionable, to say the PORTICTORY BUY BILL 118 -2- least, whether it would be good policy for the Treasury to sponsor any such organization as that evidently contemplated by Mr. Eccles. Recommendation It seems to me that the Eccles proposal is directly related to the question of paying compensation to dealers for the sale of Treasury securities. I accordingly recommend that you advise Mr. Eccles that this particular matter, like the question of compensation, will be held in abeyance pending further study. I suggest also that you would find it helpful to discuss this whole matter with Mr. Odegard, Mr. Gamble, and myself, in some detail, before arriving at any decision. A GRAVES. 119 11-7-42 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY TO THE SECRETARY: I have taliced to Harry White and to Ferdie, who is in New York today. Ferdie will talk to John Davenport or someone else of the Time crowd to try to get them to see that the sort of thing they are doing is obstructive and dangerous. Joh- Davenport was in a group of writers to whom Rendolph Paul talked at Morris Ernst's house this week. He was the most critical, probably indicating that he iswriting this stuff. Totling would be gained by any direct answer to this time article, in my opinion, with which the others agree. I think we should get the President of A.B.A. to spread the word around to counteract this sort of thing so for as he can, and I have talked to Dan about this. I could talk to Felix Beldar, head of the Time staff here, but I feel it would be useless, since I am sure these articles are teing written in New York and that Time is being needled and fed by some of our friends in the street. Therefore it is most important to get a better atmosphere there if it can be done without any surrender to them. However, I think it might be helpful if we could get John Davenport or somebody else in a respo sible position on Time down here for EL talk UOS. Sf fish to me about Hnich the 120 NOV 7- 1942 Dear Fiorella: I have your telegram of October 31st, advising me that New York City will need tabulation machines in order to comply with the tax law pro- viding for withholding at the source. Your situation is representative of the broad problem which requires War Production Board determination as to the types of equipment which can be made available. I suggest that you send me the applications for preference ratings (WPB Form PD-1A) listing your specific requirements. The matter will then be taken up with the War Production Board with the thought of working out a solution on an overall basis. Best regards. Sincerely, (Signed) H. Morgenthau, Jr. Honorable Fiorella H. La Guardia, Mayor of New York, City Hall, New York, N. Y. File direct to Mr. Bell 11/10/42 Photo file NMC. in you not sential November 6, 1942 Dear Fiorello: I have your telegram of October 31st advising me that New York City will need tabulating machines in order to comply with the new tax law providing for withholding at the source. I am having the whole matter of tabulating equipment needed for Treasury purposes surveyed by our Procurement Division. I do not know whether we can satisfy all of the requirements created as a result of the tax and other laws, but we shall do our best to meet the problem. Best regards, and thanks for calling this to my attention. Sincerely, Hon. Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Mayor of New York, New York, N. Y. FK/cgk 122 not sent November 6, 1942 Dear Donald: The enclosed telegram from Mayor LaGuardia advises me that New York City will need tabulating machines in order to comply with the provisions of the new Victory Tax. I need not emphasise to you the importance of prompt and efficient tax collection from such a large body of salaried people. I shall appreciate anything you can do to give the Mayor's request the promptest possible attention. Sincerely, Hon. Donald M. Nelson, Chairman, War Production Board, Washington, D. C. Enclosure 122 material November 6, 1942 Dear Donald: The enclosed telegram from Mayor LaGuardia advises me that New York City will need tabulating machines in order to comply with the provisions of the new Victory Tax. I need not emphasize to you the importance of prompt and efficient tax collection from such a large body of salaried people. I shall appreciate anything you can do to give the Mayor's request the promptest possible attention. Sincerely, Hon. Donald M. Nelson, Chairman, War Production Board, Washington, D. C. Enclosure 123 COPY OF TELEGRAM NEW YORK OCT 31 HONORABLE HENRY MORGENTHAU JR SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SECTION FOUR SIX SEVEN OF TAX LAW PROVIDING WITHHOLDING TAX, IT IS NECESSARY THAT NEW YORK CITY WITH ITS TWO HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND SEPARATE PAYROLL ACCOUNTS HAVE TABULATING MACHINES. WILL YOU PLEASE AID IN GETTING PRIORITY FOR NEW YORK CITY. DO NOT KNOW HOW WE CAN DO IT OTHERWISE. F. H. LE GUARDIA MAYOR 124 TREASURY DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT DIVISION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR November 9, 1942 MEMORANDUM RE: Matters discussed with Secretary Morgenthau November 7, 1942 1. Renegotiation of contracts. Mr. Randolph Paul and I talked with the Secretary relative to the matter of renegotiating contracts as authorized in the 1942 revenue act. The Secretary signed an order authorizing me to renegotiate contracts. Mr. Paul explained that the War and Navy departments, likewise the Maritime Commission, have had the authority to renegotiate and that the Treasury Department was just recently authorized under the 1942 revenue act; further, that it seemed advisable that the agency having the predominating interest because of the larger volume of business with a supplier should be the one to carry on the renegotiation for all four agencies. The Secretary requested that Mr. Paul assign one of his best men to participate in this procedure to avoid the possibility of signing contracts which otherwise might not be acceptable to the Treasury Department. In response to the Secretary's question as to how such matters would be handled, I stated that if the agency having the largest volume of business renegotiated for all four agencies, in all cases in which we did not carry on the renegotiation there would be somewhat of an "open end," and our knowledge of the basis of the set- tlement would be a review of the file rather than participation in the renegotiation. The Secretary requested that a procedure be worked out whereby administrative safeguards could be established and that the best men obtainable be used for this work. BUY 125 Matters discussed with Secretary Morgenthau -2- 11-9-42 2. Priority assistance to obtain necessary equipment for withholding tax accounting at source. I referred to a telegram to the Secretary from the Mayor of New York advising that tabulating equip- ment will be needed in connection with the withholding tax and reviewed the file which had been handed to me by Miss Chauncey immediately before going to the Secretary's office. The file contained three letters prepared for the Secretary's signature, - one to Mayor La Guardia stating that the Procurement Division is now studying the matter of tabulating equipment, another suggested letter to Mayor La Guardia stating that the matter had been referred to Nelson, and a third letter to Nelson commenting on the matter. The Secretary stated he wished the matter handled on the basis of the broad approach to the entire problem as others as well as New York City are concerned. I accordingly prepared a letter along those lines, and I gave it to the Secretary at 2 o'clock. Chifton'E.Mack Director of Procurement 126 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE November 7, 1942 Secretary Morgenthau FROM Randolph Paul I thought you might be interested in the attached copy of letter from the Office of War Information. I call your attention particularly to the last paragraph which is underlined. by Enclosure 127 OFFICE OF WAR INFORMATION C 0 Washington P Y November 4, 1942 CONFIDENTIAL Mr. Randolph E. Paul General Counsel Treasury Department Washington, D. C. Dear Mr. Paul: Your proposed address, submitted in conformity with the White House directive on speech clearance, entitled "Taxation and Consumer Spending," which you will give before the Women's Group of the New York Credit Men's Association, in New York City, November 5, has been read in the Office of War Information. It seemed to raise questions within the responsibility of the Office of Price Administration, Commerce Department, and the Office of Economic Stabilization, to whom it was referred. There is no objection to the statements made, and the address is approved for delivery as planned. However, it was pointed out by several of the agencies concerned that the figures which you use to show the "inflationary threat" are not in complete harmony with those furnished to heads of other agencies by their statisticians. This whole question is one which cannot be solved on one speech and Mr. Kuhn was advised and agrees with us that the whole thing must be worked out in conferences. However, it was felt that this address was a concide outline of the whole problem -- the best so far -- and one which should issue from the Office of War Information. Arrangements for Office of War Information release were made with your press relations and with Mr. Jack Durham of our News Bureau, who will see that this has as wide coverage as possible. Sincerely, /s/ John R. Fleming John R. Fleming Chief Bureau of Publications and Graphics 128 128 Page 1 FEDERAL RESERVE OPERATIONS IN GOVERNMENT SECURITIES Column A shows Federal Reserve operations Market purchases 1/ Market sales M is millions of dollars as follows: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Column 3 above price changes is 32nda. except for certificates which are true decimale Direct purchases free Treasury Maturities Last Week This Week 3 A A 3 A 3 A . , A 3 a , A , , A , A A 3 A A +67.0 +68.7 +29.8 -41.0 +530.4 -29.0 -3.5 -86.2 -73.1 +97.5 +139.3 A +95.4 -1.9 -10.8 3 A Full Week I. Summary +99.4 +150.1 4 Nov. 2F Description , Index 6 Full Veek 31 , 30 F 29 3 28 A 27 B Oct. 26 +22.3 4441.0 +26.0 +63.9 +1.9 +26.3 +59.7 Market purchases Market sales +25.9 Meliday -15.0 Direct purchases free Treasury -73.1 Maturities +371.1 Total set increase or decrease (-) Vednesday report of total portfolio +136.4 +17.2 +18.4 +22.2 220.1 -26.5 -53.0 -10.0 -31.0 -135.5 4156.2 -35.8 48.4 -5.8 168.4 98158.2 -287.6 e1236 -118.5 -13.7 e411.2 551.0 11. Taxable Securities +16.7 +41.3 -10.8 -1.9 Bills all issues combined +35.0 -41.0 -34:0 -73.1 +39. +5.9 -001 +33.6k.005 +6.8 +7.4 -39.1 +.6 .. +8.8 +22.4 +6.0 Market purchases Market sales Maturities +6.5 +114.1 +6.1 +.6 +20.5 +152.1 -15.0 -26.5 -33.0 -10.0 -31.0 -135.5 a123.6 -44.9 -9.4 -10.2 -107.0 +.3 +11.6 4336 Total not increase or decrease(- +25.4 002 +11.3 +1.4 +5.2 -86.2 -6.5 -36.0 Certificates 001 +.1 +184.1 -3.5 -73.1 -9.2 +1.3.001 +25.9 5/8 .65 C - ME 5-1 43 7/8 3- 8-1 43 1/25 -004 .4 +25.0 +6.0 +7.1 1004 +71.89.008 +13.89.005 1005 003 +30.1 006 4016 11-1 42 7/8 D - 11-1 43 025 -287.6 -257.6 +5.0 +9.4 .. *.. +.5 $4158.2 5.006 +.00 +.00 +.00a +26.31+.005 +004 008 +001 0.009 +.4/+.01) +10.61+.00 +5.3 +.00 4358.21+.018 fressury notes 2 +13.1 +1.5 +16.1 +1 +1 3/46 D- 3-15 3/4 9-15 11 1-1/4 DC- 12 3/4 3- +1 +3.8 +1.1 +2.3 +1.2 +3.5 +2.8 +1.0 +1.0 +1.0 +.6 +1.5 +.1 +1.9 +1.0 +1.2 3 16 +.4 +2.6 3 17 3 18 +2.8 +6.0 +4.8 +.7 +15.7 3 21 +7.5 3 26 +.5 +.3 +3.8 3 27 +1.0 -1 3 12 +1.4 +.7 +1.3 4.4 +.2 +4.3 1 -1 +1 -5 -6 0 +136.3 +75.4 +92.5 -1.9 +19.4 +62.8 +29.8 4488.3 -41.0 -29.0 -3.5 -86.2 +19.7 +53.8 +26.3 +1.0 +6.9 +1.0 +1.0 +1 +1.0 +1.0 +1 12-15 49-51 3-15 50-52 +1.0 12-15 51-55 3 28 2-1/4 6-15 3 32 3 36 2-1/2 2-1/2 2-1/2 3-15 56-58 6-15 62-67 9-15 67-72 EFG 1-1/85 7-15 RFC 4-15 000 1-1/8 2-15 +1.0 +.1 58-34 52-55 Market purchases Market sales Direct purchases free Treasury -73.1 Maturities +329.0 Total not increase or decreased Office of the Secretary of the Treasury. Division of Research and Statistics. Less than $50,000. +1.1 +1.0 +.6 +1.0 +.5 +.1 +1.9 +.2 +1.6 I -1 -1 7 All taxable securities +60.7 -73.1 +73.5 0 -10.8 +6.8 49-51 49-51 3-15 37 0 -1 6-15 9-15 2-1/2 -1 +147.1 .4 of 3-15 45-50 25 2 +1.2 +2.7 2 +1.6 +2.0 3-15 1-1/2 , 12-15 46 # 14 +123.5 +.3 +.5 +6.8 +3.9 +1 by Treasury boads +.4 +.2 +.1 +7.5 2 +1.0 +33.2 2 +1.0 +6.1 12-15 A- # 13 +69.0 43 - 3-15 % . .. +23.9 -15.0 41158.2 -287.6 -120.5 +131.3 +13.7 -26.5 +15.3 -10.0 €@1.0 $005.2 -53.0 -31.0 -135.5 al23.6 -18.8 -19.1 5.3 -10.0 Original figures revised. V Purchases and sales recorded as of day of transaction and not day of delivery. Transactions after 4 e'slook are included is the next day. 129 129 Page 2 FEDERAL RESERVE OPERATIONS IN GOVERNMENT SECURITIES Column A above Federal Reserve operations Market purchases 1/ is millions of dollars as follows: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Column B above price changes is 32nds. except Market sales V for certificates which are true decisals. Direct purchases from Treasury 1 Maturities Last Week This Week Description Nov. 2 Full Week h 3 3 3 A A , A A 3 , A a 3 A 5 Index 6 Full Week 31 7 30 , 29 3 A A A a , A a A , A 28 27 , Det. 26 A A III. Tax-exempt securities Treasury notes 1-3/49 12-15 -1 1-1/8 -1 A- C- 1 1-1/8 AC- 10 is .. - +1.6 +2. +6.9 +.1 +.8 +1.0 3-3/85 +6.5 +.2 +6.0 +1.5 +5.4 +10.6 +1.8 a 44 3-1/4 4-15 46.46 3-1/8 4-1/4 , 2 13 2-3/4 2-1/2 2 15 3-1/8 19 , , 3 22 -1 6 +.1 3 23 B +.5 +.5 +.1 -1 +.5 +.1 -1 +.5 +1 -1 +3.6 +.1 +.6 +.1 +1.6 -2 -2 7.5 +1.5 +1.1 +1.0 +.1 +.5 +1.2 -1 +.3 +.5 -1 +1.4 +.5 -1 +.1 -1 +.1 -1 +.6 +.6 3-15 48-51 9-15 48 12-15 48-50 12-15 49-52 2-1/4 12-15 51-53 6-15 53-55 6-15 54-56 3 31 2-7/8 333 2-3/4 2-3/4 2-3/4 the -1 +.5 3-15 +1.3 +.7 +.6 +2.6 -1 +1 -1 - +.5 +.5 - +.6 +1.1 +.4 +. -1 55-60 +.1 +.1 an +.7 +.5 +.5 12-15 60-65 +1.5 +.3 Outranteed securities a 1 0 , 2-1 3-15 44.40 TTNC 3-15 44.64 44.52 a . ROLO +3.0 +3.0 $2.0 - 0 -1 -1 is TTNC 3 -1 000 3/46 , 5-1 USEA 1-3/8 HOLC 45-47 All tax-exempt securities +2.9 +6.3 +5.9 +42.1 Market purchases Market sales +2.0 +5.1 +3.5 +3.1 +1.2 14.9 +2.0 +5.1 +3.5 +3.1 +1.2 +14.9 Direct purchases free Treasury Maturities +2.9 +6.3 +5.9 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury. Division of Research and Statistics. +12.1 -1 -2 +1 2-1/4 3 34 +1 +.7 25 3 29 3 30 +.5 6-56 3-15 6-15 46-48 6-15 46-49 10-15 47-52 12-15 49-53 9-15 50-52 6-15 51-54 9-15 51-55 2 +1.0 +.1 be 2-1/2 2-1/2 2-3/4 324 *.5 - -2 +1.3 12-15 47 3 14 3 20 +1.2 +1.0 43-45 12-15 9 11 +1 -1 43-47 2-1/2 E -1 +1 6-15 2-3/4 10 +1 9-15 3-15 45 10-15 3 +.1 +1.0 44 3-1/4 3-3/4 -1 -3 6-15 12-15 44.54 9-15 45-47 -1 -1 +1. is 3-15 5 +.3 43 43 6 +2.5 +5.5 2 +1.9 9-15 Treasury bonds +1.0 1 +1.5 +1.6 +3.0 3/4 -1 by 12-15 33/4 Holiday 42 6-15 Total not increase or decrease(-) Original figures revised. Less than $50.000. V Purchases and sales recorded as of day of transaction and not day of delivery. transactions after 4 e'clook are included is the next day. -1 130 THE SUN NOV 7 1942 centage would doublless be less in 1942 In this comparison of English taxes for national income In Britain has beenwith our own, we must also consider rising) the British are paying slightly the degree to which taxes have risen We are glad to publish elsewhere more in income taxes than we. On a per since the war. On this score, too, we are this page a letter from the Secretary accupita basis, however, the British are about level with the British Take the the Treasury and an accompanyingpaying slightly less than we are. You case of a married man in England with table comparing our American individual take your choice, but in either case horchildren and earning €1,000 in 1938 ual income-tax rates in the lower brack the conclusion is quite different from thess Such sum was then equivalent to ets with those in England. We are nolone which Mr. Morgenthau would haveabout $5,000 in American money. In British subject would have 1938 such impressed, however, by the evidenceus accept. which the Secretary adduces in support Not only does Mr. Morgenthau failpuid £144.19 6d in income taxes. To of his contention that "the British azeto compare the total yield of Incomedity he is required to pay a net tax after paying income taxes about twice and excess-profits taxes in the two coun-post-war credit of £302 15s 10d, an inheavy as those we shall be paying tries, but he also fails to take account ofcrease of 158 38 4d, or $790.68 at the differences In methods of assess-old/rates of exchange. (At present rates this country in 1943." It is true, as Mr. Morgenthau evers ment as between the British and our-of exchange the figure would be much that British individual income-tax rate solves. Under the British system,lower) Now compare this with a mar in the lower brackets are much higher dividends paid by a corporation to aried man with no children receiving than ours. But that statement standingstockholder are not subject to the $high$5,000 a year in the United States. His by itself gives a very misleading picturerates of the British normal tax. The taxes in 1938 would have been $82, and of the comparative tax burden in theBritish hold that such income has beenhis taxes next year. after the post-war two countries. The fact is that under the taxed In the hands of the corporation/credit is deducted, will come to $770.28, new tax bill the burden of individualand that the individual is entitled town increase of $708.28 and corporation income and excess-prof-receive what is left free. This means The increases in England and in this its taxes will be about equal to the bur-that while individual rates on earned country as well represent war taxes, den of individual and corporation incomeincome in the hands of British taxpayers Surely If the Increases be compared It and excess-profits taxes in England. are higher than ours, British incomecannot be said that the war has laid More On Income Taxes Here And In Great Britain a Consider the facts. According to Sens- taxes on unearned income in the hands twice as heavy taxes on the British as on for George, the individual and corporatof individuals are much lower than ours.our own people. tion taxes under the new law will bring Mr. Morgentbau contends that this in $20,054,000,000 a year. This sum #difference is of no moment. He says that about eighteen per cent. of our national only one half of one per cent. of all income for 1942, and it represents taxpayers received income exclusively burden of $152 per capita. On the other from dividends in 1936. This point could hand, British individual and corporation also be very misleading, If allowed to income taxes for the year ending nextstand alone. The statistics of income as March are expected to yield £1.416/published by the Treasury show that 000,000. which is equivalent at presen@dividends received by taxpayers in rates of exchange to $5,664,000,000. This1936 amounted to $3,173,844,000. and is a per-capita tax burden of only 8106,that this qum represented 14.5 per cent. which is less than our own, but, on that all individual income subject to tax. other hand, it represents approximately.In England this 14.5 per cent. of indi twenty-two per cent. of the British/vidual Income would not have paid any tax In the hands of its recipients, but in national income in 1941. In other words, as compared with this country It bears the full weight of their national income in 1941 (the per-the individual levies. 131 THE SUN NOV 7 1942 Income Tax Comparison Secretary Morgenthau Renews His Contention That The British Pay Twice The Levies We Do To THE EDITOR OF THE SUN Sir: Last Monday I gave the press some figures contrasting the per taxes with the combined Federal and State income taxes payable by persons living in New York. We sonal income taxes payable by the choose New York State even British taxpayers. These figures. because of the large number of tax. vast majority of American and computed for persons receiving in- though its rates are higher than those prevailing in most States. payers who live in New York. It may be helpful to you to have comes primarily from wages and salaries, show that the British are paying income taxes about twice the attached table (the table ap as heavy as those we shall be pay- ing the personal income tax which pears immediately below) compar- ing in this country in 1943: Your editorial November 5 charges me with giving some misleading fig. ares. May I ask the hospitality of your columns for a reply? Your criticism is based on the tax with the personal income tax payable by a resident of Great example of a taxpayer who receives liability in Great Britain is at Since in 1941 only five per cent. of country for taxpayers with incomes $4,000 income from dividends. the entire national income came from dividends, while almost sev- enty per cent. represented the com- pensation of employés, it is clear that a taxpayer whose income is derived exclusively from dividends is anything but typical As a matter of fact, In 1936. the most recent year for which we have such figures, only one half of one per cent. of all taxpayers received their income exclusively from dividends. I leave it to you to judge which is more "mislead ing comparison of taxpayers receiving incomes primarily from wages or salaries or one of taxpayers receiving incomes exclusively from dividends. The figures I released to the press compare the British income will be payable by an American tax- payer subject also to the Maryland Britain. You will note that the net tax least twice as large as that in this below $4,000. The American taxpayers in this group account for more than ninety per cent. of all taxpayers under the net income tax and for an even larger percentage of all taxpayers under the Victory tax. Further. the post-war credit in Great Britain can be taken ourrently only in rare instances where- as the Victory tax post-war credit in this country can be taken cur- rently up to the amount of debt re- payment. payment of insurance premiums, and purchase of war bonds. For most taxpayers, total tax liabilities in Great Britain are even larger relatively to those in this country than net tax liabilities. H. MORGENTHAU, Ja. Washington, Nov. 5. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX Amount of tax and effective rates in the United States and in Great Britain Married person-Do dependents United states. Incleding personal exemption* Great Britaini Maryland-Blate SEAT Net income before Total iss Post-war liability credit Net tax ability Total tax Post/ear liability credit Net tax liability AMOUNT OF TAX $1,000 $24 $10 $50 $111 $61 79 280 94 185 188 505 127 378 $15 1,500 100 2,000 220 754 76 678 1,405 193 1,211 4,000 1,357 1,238 2,305 260 6,000 121 165 1,855 3,305 260 8,000 2,030 2,045 3,045 210 2,573 4.505 260 4.245 10,000 2,783 $1,000 2.4 1.0 1.5 1,500 6.7 1.4 5.3 2,000 11.0 1.6 21 32 EFFECTIVE RATES (per cent) 11.1 6.1 5.0 18.7 6.3 12.3 9.4 25.3 6.4 18.9 35.1 4.8 30.3 4,000 18.9 1.9 17.0 2.0 20.6 38.4 34.1 22.6 4.3 6,000 41.3 38.1 25.4 23.3 3.3 8,000 2.1 45.1 2.6 42.5 2.1 25.7 10,000 27.8 Note: Due to rounding, items may not add to totals. *Before deduction of the Maryland State tax. All income is assumed to be earned Tax liabilities shown forethe United States include the Victory tax. which becomes effective on January 1, 1943. Pound converted at $4. 133 Nov. 7, 1942 My dear Mr. Secretary: There is enclosed a copy of an opinion of the General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury, obtained ourswant to the recuest made by the Quartermaster General through Captain Charles L. Kades. That ovinion rules that officers of the Department of War may properly certify under Executive Order No. 9177, dated May 30, 1942, 7 Fed. Reg. 4195, that the procurement of the following types of war materials constitutes "an emergency purchase of war material abroad" (1) Captured materials, including (a) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by the United States forces, (b) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by a national of one of the United Nations or by the armed forces of such a nation and turned over to the United States forces, and (c) materials taken by United States forces in occupied territories after the cessation of hostilities in such territories. (2) Materials seized (recuisitioned) by the United States forces abroad. (3) Rebuilt materials; that is, materials which are refabricated from other materials owned by, captured by, or turned over to, the United States forces. (4) Material received (either by ourchase, gift, or as reciprocal Lend-Lease aid) from the government of, or an individual national of, a foreign nation (not necessarily one of the United Nations) for study and testing with a view to its ultimate use by the United States forces. The materials, it is understood, would be brought into the United States by the armed forces for purposes in connection with the actual conduct of the war. -2- see As the opinion indicates, this Department is inclined to the view that the Tariff Act is not applicable to transactions of the kind here involved. How- ever, since such transactions may be properly viewed as emergency purchases of war material abroad, it is believed that the wiser and more expedient course, at the present time, would be to have the certificates contemplated by Executive Order No. 9177 executed. Accordingly, the various Collectors of Customs are being advised that henceforth any materials falling within the enumerated categories should be admitted free of duty uoon receipt of the certificate recuired by Executive Order No. 9177. (a) Very truly yours, (Signed) Herbert E. Gaston Acting Secretary of the Treasury. The Honorable The Secretary of War. Enclosure 134 OP. NO. 540 NOV. 6, 1942 My dear Mr. Secretary: The question has arisen whether officers of the Department of War may properly certify under Executive Order No. 9177, dated May 30, 1942, 7 Fed. Reg. 4195, that the acquisition of the following types of war materials #constituted an emergency purchase of war material abroad", (a) Captured materials, including (1) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by the United States forces; (2) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by a national of one of the other United Nations or by the armed forces of such a nation and turned over to the United States forces; and (3) materials taken by United States forces in occupied territories after the cessation of hostilities in such territories. (b) Materials seized (requisitioned) by the United States forces abroad. to (c) Rebuilt materials, i.e., materials which are refabricated from other materials owned By, captured by, or turned over to, the United States forces, as, for example, a tank reconstructed from the parts of partially demolished enemy, United Nations, and United States tanks. (d) Material received (oither by purchase, gift, or as reciprocal Lend-Lease aid) from the government of or an individual national of, a foreign nation (not necessarily one of the United Nations) for study and testing with a view to its ultimate use by the United States forces, as, for example, a gun invented by a Mexican citizen and sont to the United States for testing. It is understood that the purpose of bringing the materials into the United States is either (1) for scrap, or (2) for study or testing, or (3) for training purposes. It is my opinion that certificates for such materials may properly be made. It is to DO noted, first, that there is grave doubt Mother the provisions of the Tariff Act may be applied to the movement by the United States armed forces of war materials in time of war. It is fundamental that statutos should not be so construed as to raise grave questions of their constitutionality. United States v. LaFranca, (1931) 282 U.S. 568, 574; Ann Arbor Railroad Company v. United States, (1930) 281 U.S. 658, 669. It is also clcar that an matters relating to the actual conduct of the war are vested sololy in the Prosident. By Constitution Art. II, SCC. 2, it is provided that the President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, and, while Art. I, sec. 8, cl. 11, of the Constitution vests in the Congress the power to declare war, that power does not include the power actually to conduct the war, Thus, the dobatos in the Constitutional - As the opinion indicates, this Department is inclined to the view that the Tariff Act is not apolicable to transactions of the kind here involved. How- ever, since such transactions may be properly viewed as emergency purcrases of war material abroad, it is believed that the wiser and more expedient course, at the present time, would be to have the certificates cortemplated by Executive Order No. 9177 executed. Accordingly, the various Collectors of Customs are being advised that henceforth any materials falling within the enumerated categories should be admitted free of duty uoon receipt of the certificate required by Executive Order No. 9177. Very truly yours, (Signed) Herbert E. Gaston Acting Secretary of the Treasury. The "onorable The Secretary of War. Enclosure 134 OP. NO. 540 NOV. 6, 1942 My dear Mr. Secretary: The question has arisen whether officers of the Department of War may properly certify under Executive Order No. 9177, dated May 30, 1942, 7 Fed. Reg. 6195, that the acquisition of the following types of war materials "constituted an emergency purchase of war material abroad", (a) Captured materials, including (1) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by the United States forces; (2) materials of any origin captured or recaptured by a national of one of the other United Nations or by the armed forces of such a nation and turned over to the United States forces; and (3) materials taken by United States forces in occupied territories after the cessation of hostilities in such territories. (b) Materials seized (requisitioned) by the United States forces abroad. to southes (c) Rebuilt materials, i.e., materials which are refabricated from other materials owned by, captured by, or turned over-to, the United States forces, as, for example, a tank reconstructed from the parts of partially demolished enemy, United Nations, and United States tanks. (d) Material received (oither by purchase, gift, or as reciprocal Lend-Lease aid) from the government of or an individual national of, a foreign nation (not necessarily one of the United Nations) for study and testing with a view to its ultimate use by the United States forces, as, for example, a gun invented by a Mexican citizen and sont to the United States for testing. It is understood that the purpose of bringing the materials into the United States is either (1) for scrap, or (2) for study or testing, or (3) for training purposes. It is my opinion that certificates for such materials may prop-> erly be made. It is to bo noted, first, that there is grave doubt methor the provisions of the Tariff Act may be applied to the movement by the United States armed forces of war materials in time of war. It is fundamental that statutes should not be so construed as to raise grave questions of their constitutionality. United States V. LaFranca, (1931) 282 U.S. 568, 574; Ann Arbor Railroad Company V. United States, (1930) 281 U.S. 658, 669. It is also clear that an matters relating to the actual conduct of the war are vested solely in the Prosident. By Constitution Art. II, sec. 2, it is provided that the President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, and, while Art. I, sec. 8, cl. 11, of the Constitution vosts in the Congress the power to declare war, that power does not includo the power actually to conduct the war. Thus, the debates in the Constitutional -Convention show that the war clause as originally reported gav Congress the power to "make war". That phrase. was changod to "doclare warm thus #leaving to the Executive power to repcl suddon attacks", It is noterthy that Lr, Ellsworth, later Chiof Justice of the Supremo Court, with- dren his objection when Mr. King such stod that #tmake war might bo understood to 'conduct it, which was an Executive function". 3 Documentary History of the Constitution of the United States of America (Dopt. of State 1900) 552-554 Again, the concurring opinion of Chiof Justice Chano and Justicpa Wayno, Swayno, and Miller in Ex parto Milligan, (U.S. 1066) 4 Wall. 2, 139, contains the following exposition of the rulo: "Congress has the pow not only to raise and support and govern armics but to doclar war. It has, therefore, th: power to provide by law for carrying on war. This power necessarily extends to all logislation essontial to tho prosocution of war ml th vigor and success, except such as interferes with the command of the forces and the conduct of campaigns. That power and duty bolong to the President as commanderwin-chicf, Both these powers are derived from the Constitution, but neithor is defined by that instrument. Their extent must bc determined by their naturo, and by the principles of our institutions. "The power to make the necessary laws is in Congress; the power to execute in the President Both powers imply many subordinate and auxiliary powers. Each includes all authoritics essential to its duc exercise. But neither can the Prosident, in war more than in pcacc, intrudo upon the proper authority of Congress, nor Congress upon the proper authority of the President. Finally, in the recont caso of Ex parte Quirin ot al., (1942) 11 U.S. L. Wook 4001, 4003, the Supremo Court stated "The Constitution thus invests the President as Commander in Chiof with the power to wage war which Congress has doclared, and to carry into affect all laws passac by Congress "for the conduct of war and for the government and regulation of the Armod Forces, and all laws defining and punishing offences against the law of nations, including those which portain to the conduct of war. (Underscoring supplied.) It follows that the Congress cannot constitutionally chact any law which interforce with the actual conduct by the President of a war. 135 3 - The movement of men and materials is plainly an essential factor in the actual conduct of the war. No one would contend, for example, that the Congress could validly impose a head tax on troops moved in and out of the country by the President in the exercise of his powers as Commander in Chief, Similarly, it seems obvious that a requirement that war matorials brought into the country, by the Uni ted States armed forces be subject to the various proccures of Customs and to the payment of dutios might con- stitute an Illegal interference with the President's powers, particularly since Customs procedure requires appraisal and appraisal necessitates inspection. The onds to which the armed forcos have gond in the protection of the American bomb sight, for oxamplo, might be millified if that sight were open to Inspection by a Customs official. The necessary delay 00casioned by claring such materials through Customs might be a further and not inconsequentIal interference with the President's powers. It is, of coursc, true that some of the proporty brought in by the armed foroos is captured materials, and that the Congress is by Art. I, sec. 8, cl. 11, of the Constitution given power to #make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Watdr". I do not deem it nocessary to determine the extent of that power. It is sufficient for mo to say that if that power is construed to permit the imposition in time of war by the Congress of duties and burdensome Customs procodures on the bringing into the United States by the armod forcas of war materials described above, the power may then be brought into conflict with the President's constitutional power actually to conduct the war, and that, consequently, gravo questions of constitutional law are raised. Within the authoritics citod above, the Tariff Act ought not, in the abs nco of an express indication to that effect be construod as an attompt to impose dutiqs and burdensoma Customs procodures on war materials brought into the United States by the armod forces in the conduct of war if it can properly bo otherwisc construct. To construe it as imposing such dutios and procoduros raisos grave con- stitutional questions. That the Tariff Act may be properly construod not to includo captured war mat rials or booty is ovidenced by the Briof reported in connection with (1898) Treas. Syn. 19508. That decision, which was approved by the Attornoy Gonoral, roads: "Treasury Department, Juno 18, 1898. Lours "Collector of Customs, Now York, N.A.H. There is no existing law exacting duty on goods condomned by a prize court, and, in the absonco of such author ity, no duty can be collected. Neutral goods ro- leased by a prize court may be delivered to owner for immodiate export. If rétained for consumption in this country, they become dutiable on appraiso- mont, W. B. Howell, Assistant Secretary." 4- The Briof, which was submitted to the Attornoy General, contains the following portinont passage: "What, then, is the intontion of Congress with respect to prise-proporty as imported morchandise? The titlo of the tariff. act shows that customs dutics: are imposed for two purposes, namely, (1) to provide revonue for the Government, and (2) to oncourago domestic industrios. Is either of those purposes served by the imposition of dutios on prizo goods? Assuredly not. The status of such proporty is ossentially different from that of ordinary importations. The lattor are voluntarily exported in the usual course of commerce; the formor are captured by superior force from the public onomy. In the one caso, the name of the exporter, the country of exportation, and the character and value of the goods are material facts; in the other caso, it is immaterial from whom or where the goods camo, or what they aro worth. * "The taking of prizos is an act of war in furthcrance of the object of war. The Government derives no reyenuc, as such, therefrom. "Nor docs the imposition of dutics on prizo goods accomplish the socond purpose of tariff logislation. The element of compotition betwoon domestic and foreign morchandisc, as such, is wanting. # ** Those arguments, applicable to prizes captured during the Spanish-American War, are equally applicable to the war matorials here under considoration, One of the decisions incorporated in the Briof submitted to the Attorney General substantiates the proposition that the revenue purpose of the Tariff Act doos not require imposition of duty on captured goods. The Liverpool Hero, (C.C.D. Mass. 1814) Fod. Cas. No. 8,405, 15 Fed. Cas. 639. In that caso, Mr. Justice Story, sitting in Circuit, hold that an act which exempted prize goods from the non-importation acts, but provided that such goods, when imported into the United States, should be subject to dutios, did not apply to the portion of the goods belonging to the United.,States, but did apply to the portion bolonging to the officers and crow. The reasoning upon which the decision concerning the United Statos goods was based was that Ba * * it is difficult to conceive how the United States can either pay or securo the duties to thomsolvos It is, of courso, a fact that the professed purposo of the 136 customs duty statutes at that time W38 solely revenue, but the protectivo purposo of the Tariff Act is certainly not defeated in the instant caso. I call your attontion also to the reasoning of Attorney Gonoral Bonapart in (1908) 26 Op. Atty. Gen. 466. Ho there hold that coal imported by the Navy was subject to duty since a comparison of the language of earlier acts (excmpting Government importations gonorally) with the language of the then act (omitting that exemption except in specific casos) indicated A Congressional intent that Government imports should be subject to duty. Howgver, no held that the purposes of the then tariff act did not requiro such a holding, stating that (at pago 468) "The mischiefs to be redressed or, in other words, the purposes of the legislature in this case, are indicated wi th sufficient accuracy by the titlo of the act itself. It is entitled 'An act to provide revenue for the Government and to encourage the in- dustries of the United States. The first of the purposes thus expressed certainly would not be promoted by requiring the payment of duties by the Government on articles imported from foreign countries for its own uso. So far as the Government is concernod, such payments would amount, in effect, merciy to taking money out of one pocket and putting it into another; obviously, this process would not 'provide revonuc for the Government. It is true that the law might be supposed to furnish a motivo for the Exocutivo Departs in the expenditure of general appropri- ations to purchase American rather than foreign goods, but, since we must assume that all responsible officers of the Government will be guided in their public acts by the policies adoptod, by the Congress, WC must also assume, in the construction of the statuto, that this of y According to most authorities, the distinct protective policy began with the law onacted in 1816. IV Dictionary of American History (1940) 365, 2/ That decision does not affect my conclusion that the Tariff Act should not be construed to include war materials brought into the United States by the armed forces in the conduct of the war, since the importation there involved occurred in time of peace, davorit.fr 6- - motive would exist in full force without the necd of any such onactmont. If, therefore, the avoted, and univorsally understood, purposos of the act wore all that WC had to consider in this connection, I should find in them no sufficient reason to outweigh the presumption that the Government was not included in the general languago requiring payment of dutics by importors. Enough has been said to indicate that it is my view that the Tariff Act should not be construed to require that war materials brought into the United States by the armod forces in the conduct of war bc subject to customs procedures and dutics. That view, of necessity, rendors Exocutive Order No. 9177, supra, and the Act of Junc 30, 1914, c. 130, 38 Stat. 399 (U.S.C., 1940 ed., titlo 34, sec. (568), upon which it is based superfluous with rospect to materials here doaIt with in timo of mr. If, however, it bo concoded, arguendo, that the Tariff Act does apply, then it is novertholose my view that Exocutivo Ordor No. 9177, and the Act of Juno 30, 1914, supra, permit Importation by the Government of such war materials froo of duty, Exocutivo Order No. 9177 authorized the Secretarios of War, Navy, Agriculture, and Trensury, and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to exercise the duties vested in the Secretary of the Navy by the Act of June 30, 1914, supra. That statute roads as follows: ## # # Provided, That hereafter the Socretary of the Nivy is hereby authorized to make emergency purchases of war torial abroad: And provided further, That whon such purchases are made abroad, this material shall bc admitted free of duty." It has been suggested that the rulo of #commercial designation", 1.0., that in tho interprotation of laws imposing duties on imports, the language used by the Congress shall be construed according to the commorcial understanding, requires that the word #purchase", as used in the quoted statuto, be given the narrow commercial meaning of acquisition in exchange for money. It is to be notod, however, that the quoted provision is a part of the appropriation act for the naval service for the fiscal your 1915, Two Hundred Chosts of Tea, (U.S. 1824) 9 Whoat. 430, 438; Maddock V. Magono, (1894) 152 U.S. 368, 371; Bakolito Corporation V. Unitod Statos, (1928) 16 Ct. Cust. Apple. 378, 381. y As is indicated by the manner in which the provision is codified, it is, in effect, a separate provision although it appoars in the appropriation actthe following in section.several other *provided* clauses as the last two such clauses 137 to 7 and that the provision dealing with imports appears only as a proviso to the authorization to make emergency purchases abroad. It is the general rule that a proviso must benconstrued in the light of the language to which it is appended The Dollar Sayings Bank V. United States, (U.S. 1873) 19 Wall. 227, 235. I am, therefore, of the opinion that the rule of commercial désignation" limi ted as it is to. construction of customs laws, does not apply in the instant case. Particularly is this so since the word #purchases", as it appears in the proviso, 11 modified by the word "such", referring to the phrase in the earlier portion of the statute, "emergency purchases, of war material abroad". tris further my view that, with reference: to property obtained in occupied territory after cessation of hostilities in that territory, the conclusion I navelstated above is not affected: by the rule that goods imported from occupied territory is subject to customs duties. The cases announcing that rule (Fleming et al. v. Page, (U.S. 1850) 9 How 603, A.S. Lascelles & Co. V. The United States, (1914) 49 Ct. C1. 382, aff'd. sub. nom, De Paso v. United States, (1917) 223 U.S. 625) are distinguishable since they GILL not deal with war materials brought in by the United States armed Corbes as part of the conduct of the nar. There remains the question whether the matorials here dealt with may be considered "emergency purchases of war material abroad". at Several strong arguments can be made for the proposition that the word as used in the act under consideration was intended in its broadest sense. Particularly apt is the language of the court in Unitod (at States V. Beaty, (W.D. Va. 1912) 198 Fod. 284.5 It was there black bite said page 286) * When used in a statute, the word 'purchase is froquently held to include any method of acquisition other than by doscont. 7 Words and Phrases, 5853. To construe the word here to mean only ,acquisition by buying, we must assume that Congress had in mind the method of acquisition Father than the general purpose to acquire. The mere use of the word purchase which may have been used in its technical sense 44 is not to my mind a sufficient reason for such assumption. If, as TO must, we give the members of Congress credit for a reasonable knowledge of human nature, they mist be assumed to have S/ This case was reversed on another point in Beatty V. United diamissed States, (C.C.A.) 4th, 1913) 203 Fed. 620, cert. denied and writ of error could. (1914) 232 U.S. 463a The circuit court of appeals statod that it find no error in the ruling of the trial judge onothe point hore in- volved (see page 621). 8- known that to restrict acquirement to voluntary sales by the owners would most probably defeat the chief purpose for which the appropriation purchase of land was mado. (Underscoring supplied) In like manner it may be said that; since the statute here in question was intended as permanent logislation and deals with materials of war, the Congress, giving it credit for a reasonable knowledge of the manners and methods of conducting war; must be assumed to have, known that war materials are ofton, through necessity, or the fortunes of wary acquired in ways other than by buying, and that those ways includo capture, soizuro, exchange, and gift, and, in fact, overy conceivable method by which a war- ring nation may acquire war materials. If the act is so construed, there is no difficulty in holding that a tank or similar article fabricated by the United States forces from several partially demolished tanks is also purchased (1.0., acquired) within the moaning of the act, Again, the derivation and dictionary definitions of the word #purchase furnish a strong basis for thb conclusion here reached. The word is derived from the French words "pour" and "chacier", the literal translation of which is "to pursue, to chaso", and is defined by Wobster's Now International Dictionary (Second Edition), in part, as follows: "That which is obtained, got, or acquired, in any mannor, honcstly or dishonestly; gain; booty; acquisitions; now, specif, that obtained for a price in money or its equivalent. Funk and Wagnalls Now Standard Dictionary defines the word (151 "The act of purchasing; acquisition by giving an equivalent in money or other exchange value; the acquiring or obtaining of anything by paying a price of any kind, as by exortion or running a risk." Those definitions are of value so far as they indicate that, while the specific meaning of the word "purchase" is "that obtained for a price in money or its equivalent", in its broader sense the word clearly oncompassos captured war materials (booty; acquisition by running a risk), refabricated American materials (acquisition by exortion), and donated materials (acquisition in any manner). The legislative history of the Act of June 30, 1914, throws no the light on the question. Nowhere in the hearings, reports, or debates provision in question mentioned, is 138 9 Further, it is to be noted that even within the specific definition of the word, the materials obtained by the United States by roquisition, or as reciprocal Lond-Loaso aid, are "purchases". By definition requisitioned materials are paid for, and by virtuo of the so-called "Mastor Agreements", which the Unitod States has entered into with cach nation receiving Lond-Lease aid, aid given to the United States is constituted a part of the quid pro quo for Lond-Lease aid by the United Statos. It is cloar, thereforc, that all such materials are obtained by the Unitod States for a prico in money or its equivalent. In summary, it is my opinion that the Tariff Act should not be construct to apply to the materials hore in question, but that if that act is so construct, the materials are exempt from dutios as "omorgoncy purchases of war material abroad". Undor eithor view, there would be no im- proprioty in the oxecution by officers of the Department of War of the certificate required by Exocutivo Order No. 9177. Very truly yours, (Signed) Randolph Paul General Counsel. The Honorable The Secretary of the Treasury. 139 BOARD OF ECONOMIC WARFARE OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WASHINGTON, D.C. SECRET NOV 7 1942 The Honorable, The Secretary of the Treasury. Dear Mr. Secretary: The minutes covering the meeting of the Board of Economic Warfare, which was held on Thursday, October 15, are enclosed. If there are any corrections which you care to suggest, please let me know. Also enclosed is the Agenda for the next meeting of the Board to be held on Thursday, November 12. Sincerely yours, Nile Parki Executive Director Enclosure attract refatom on Snowlish true when What things it bank othis 140 SECRET AGENDA FOR THE BOARD OF ECONOMIC WARFARE MEETING TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 12. 1942 AT 10:00 A.M. IN THE OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT II THE CAPITOL 1. Discussion of report on Cryptostegia, "Report to the Board of Economic Warfare on Cryptostogia". Report attached. 2. Further discussion of Swedish trade policy. Reports attached - BL-10 Rev. 2 "Trade Policy Toward Sweden" BL-10-b "Trade Policy Toward Sweden" 141 Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Economic Warfare Held October 15, 1942 at 10:00 a.m. A meeting of the Board of Economic Warfare was held in the Vice President's office in the Capitol Building at 10:00 a.m. on October 15, 1942. Those present: The Vice President, Chairman of the Board Mr. Dean Acheson, representing the Secretary of State Mr. E. M. Bornstein, representing the Secretary of the Treasury Mr. Charlos Fahy, representing tho Attorney Genoral The Secretary of tho Navy The Socrotary of Agriculturo The Socretary of Commorco Hr. Nolson Rockofellor, Coordinator, Inter-Amorican Affairs Mr. E. R. Stottinius, Jr., Lond Leaso Administration In addition, the following porsons were present: Mr. Wayne Taylor, Department of Commerce Mr. T. L. Clayton, Department of Commorco Mr. Loslio Whoolor, Department of Agriculture Mr. Robort Pattorson, War Dopartmont Mr. Harold H. Noff, War Department Mr. Thomas K. Finlottor, Stato Department Mr. Milo Porkins, Board of Economic Warfaro Mr. Cass Canfield, Board of Economic Warfaro Mr. Hickman Prico, Jr., Board of Economic Warfaro Mr. E. W. Gaumnitz, Board of Economic Warfaro The Vice President oponod tho mosting indicating that tho mooting had not boon hold for somo timo duo to the absonco of himsolf and Mr. Porkins, but that mootings woro to bo hold moro rogularly horoaftor. Tho Vico President thon roforrod to the South African roport. "Proposed Action for Assisting the South African War Program. Tho Vico Prosident gave somo background on the report indicating that South Africa was stratogically locatod, is contributing to the war offort but that further contributions aro dosirablo and important, that any furthor increase in war offort apparently would bo depondont on roduction of gold production. Up to the presont, apparently tho policy of the British and South African maintain or increase gold production, gold-produc- 15 cont theprovailing whitos and in 1939. Governments tion currontlyabout has running boon abovo to por lovol Ho indicated that gold production was omploying about 40,000 365,000 nativos and consuming supplios amounting to about 3,000,000 tons the of which tonnago was producod domostically, with howovor from the Unitod Statos and por somo yoar, supplios groator part boing raised England. the quostion Ho indicatod of further that any docronse in gold production always the effect upon tho political situation in South Africa, thoro boing concorn which that a roduction in gold production would tond to causo unomployment in turn might result in the ovorthrow of the Government. -2- Mr. Perkins indicated that the proposal set forth in the report involved attacking the problem !positively! by giving assistance to South Africa in the development of var industries, at the same time reducing supplies to be used for gold production purposes, these objectives being handled through a Supply Council which would "screen" South African requirements. The Council would be composed of three representativos, one each from the United Statos, South Africa, and Groat Britain with unanimous agroomont boing nocessary. To assist in the developmont of war industrios, tho Unitod Statos would undortako to mako available supplios necessary for this purposo, within the limit of ovorall supply and shipping considorations. Undor such a procoduro it was ostimated that gold production might bo roducod by moro than 25% Mr. Josso Jonos was very positivo in his fooling that overy effort should bo made to cut gold production by moro than what soomod to bo contomplatod. Ho folt that this should bo dono with spood and dispatch. In tho discussion, it was mado clear that increased omphasis on war industrios was limitod by availablo labor, both skilled and unskillod, that increased labor could only bo drawn from gold mining, that gold would not bo roducod without prossuro and assistanco, and that attompts to socure moro oxtonsivo conversion had thus far boon rósistod by both the British and South Africans. It was also the conconsus that the bargaining position of tho Unitod Statos could bo onhancod if a goal wore ostablished roquiring tho maximum convorsion possiblo rathor than a reduction in gold production of more than 25% and latitudo woro allowed in the axact procoduro to bo followed in accomplishing tho result. Tho following rosolution was passod: (tho oxnct wording of which was cleared following the mooting.) "WHEREAS, The successful and oarly conclusion of tho nor roquiros the most offectivo utilization of all the rosourcos of tho Unitod Statos and of tho Unitod Nations: "AND WHEREAS, It is bolieved the Union of South Africa is in a position to lond furthor aid to the vor offort of the Unitod Nations by maximum conversion of its industrios to Your production; "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Economic Warfaro recommonds that maximum and rapid conversion of tho South African oconomy to a full war oconomy bo achioved, that the approprinto U. S. agoncios assist in such convorsion by making availablo such supplios, within the limits of production and shipping facilitios, ns are necessary for the further development of South African var industrios, and that appropriato administrativo monsuros bo takon for carrying out this program aggrossivoly. The mooting odjourned nt 11:15 a.m. 142 BEW-Imports November 6, 1942 REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ECONOMIC WARFARE ON CRYPTOSTEGIA Summary A tropical perennial vine, known in India and recognized as a source of rubber since 1837. Fast growing, disease resistant, low percentage rubber content per plant, relatively high yield per acre. Probably imported to this hemisphere as a decorative plant. Seeds have been widely spread via winds and tropical storms. Now found in Mexico and Central America. Cryptostegia was first investigated in June 1942. Quality of rubber investigated and found good. Seed shortage and no mechani- cal extraction mothod deterring factors. Adequate staff assigned to survey to locate seeds. The problem of extraction was assigned to Eastern and Southern Laboratories of the Bureau of Chemistry and Engineering of the Department of Agriculturo in oarly June. Indepondont research also being conducted by MIT, and several tire company labora- tories. Progress is boing made but the problom of extraction via mechanical moans is not solvod. SHADA in Haiti working with the Department of Agriculturo has developed a practical hand extraction mothod - much labor is involved but yields of ovor 200 pounds por acre are indicated. A contract with SHAJA for acreages up to 100,000 has boon executed, "cost return" basis - nominal foo. At present nogotiations are boing conducted with other contractors for plantings when sood is available. Requirements - ample labor supply to onable hand tapping if necessary and flat land to onablo mochanical harvesting if developod. -2CRYPTOSTEGIA First Known. The first reference we find about Cryptostegia is a report of this vine grown in the Botanic Garden in Calcutta in 1837 and stated to yield a rubber superior in whiteness and elasticity to that of Ficus Elastica. In 1889 we find the reference "a considerable effort is being made to extend the cultivation of this plant both in Madras and Bombay" and that "Cryptos- tegia grandiflora is cultivated in gardens in nearly every section of India." In 1890 the Conservator of Forests, Southern Circle, Madras, reported that this vine, "grows well all over the plains and yields a fair amount of sap we first find a report of a chemical analysis of C. grandiflora which is very closely in line with results we are obtaining today, namely, Rubber 89.5 which on coagulation produces a very firm and superior rubber," In 1904 percent, Resin 7.9 percent, Insoluble 2.6 percent. Although we have been able to find repeated references to Cryptostegia rubber (known as Palay rubber) in East Indian reports, nowhere have we been able to find it definitely stated that it has been produced in commercial quantities. Species. There are two species, C. grandiflora and C. Madagascariensis, also as interspecific hybrid. It is upon C. grandiflora, the most abundant species, that our program is based, and all figures given here relate to this species. C. Madagascariensis has too low a rubber content to be of interest. Quality of Rubber. Cryptostegia rubber has been analyzed, vulcanized, and tested by some of our leading rubber chemists, including Hauser, Haefele, West, McGavack, and Trumbull, and all of these by their reports show great enthusiasm for it. The following extracts from a letter written by Dr. Trumbull of the B.F. Goodrich Company to Mr. Bicknell of Rubber Reserve Company, sum up the general opinion of these experts: 11 We should be very fortunate, indeed, to be able to get rubber of as good a quality. X-Ray interference diagrams of this (rubber) were identical with those from hard fine para. Because of the high quality of rubber derived from Cryptostegia, because of the fact that it comes from a natural latex with particle size, ranges in size and uniformity of particle size, close to hevea latex; because the rubber is truly isoprone rubber, it seems to me to morit attention I earnestly hope that something is done to promoto cultivation and harvest of this vine rubber. II Additional commonts follow: From Mr. H. L. Trumbull of the B. F. Goodrich Company: "Because of the high quality of rubber derived from Cryptostegia, because of the fact that it comes from a natural latex with particle size, ranges of size and uniformity of particle size close to hevea latex. Because the rubber is truly isoprene rubber, it soomod to me to merit attention undor the act of March 5, 1942. This suggestion was left with the committee and I earnostly hope thatrubber." something is done to promoto cultivation and harvest of this vino Mr. A. V. McMullan of the Department of Agriculturo to Dale Jonkins of the Rubbor Division on November 3, 1942: "The quality of Cryptostogia rubbor is excellent." 143 Bureau of Standards report of September 24, 1942 on an analysis of Cryptostegia rubber stated that the "quality was good" and gave considerable technical information which is on file in the Rubber Division of BEW. Commenting on the details of this report in a telephone conversation with L. H. Heller of the Rubber Division on October 14, 1942, Mr. Ernst Hauser, rubber chemist at MIT said; "The high acid content of samples of Cryptostegia rubber thus far received indicates the need for a different type of preparation of the latex. I am convinced from X-Ray defraction charts just made that the rubber is of extremely high quality." Mr. L. G. Polhamus in conversation with Mr. W. A. Stanton of the Rubber Division on November 5, 1942 said: "Because of the similarity of resin content of Cryptostegia with Castilloa rubber, I think it well to compare these two, and we can do so without the slightest reflection upon the quality of either. In my opinion Cryptostegia rubber is of equal quality to high grade Castilloa." There is apparently little doubt that with a compound formula well suited to it, Cryptostegia rubber can be classed with some of the best. Percent of Rubber. While the leaves of Cryptostegia are reported to contain from 1.69 percent to 6.72 percont rubber, the stems are low in rubber content .31 percent to .34 percent - and for the whole plant an average rubber content of 1.25 percent is found. Optimum Conditions for Growth. Cryptostogia is a tropical and subtropical plant which grows well in regions of high temperature but is injured by exposure to frost. Unlike Guayule, which requires a dry, dormant period in which to manufacture its rubber, Cryptostegia rubeer content is in direct ratio to its growth. No important disease or insect damage which attacks Cryptostogia has been discovered. Late Development. Cryptostegia was first drawn to the attention of BEW early in Juno when Mr. Fennell showed the plant to Messrs. Sherover and Jonkins, who had gone to Haiti to investigate the feasibility of obtaining rubber from Castilloa seedlings. Mr. Sherover was greatly impressed with the possibili- ties of Cryptostegia as a rubber producing plant, and upon his return put Mr. Jenkins on to search all published information on the subject. From this material, Mr. Jenkins prepared his first memo on the subject. This was subsequently enlarged and mimeographed. As more information was obtained, Nr. Sherover's onthusiasm increased and on June 22 a mooting was called which was attended by various reprosentatives of BEW, by Dr. Bressman, and by Dr. Rands and Mr. Polhamus of the Bureau of Plant Industry. All angles of the proposition were discussed in the light of information then available and the concensus at that time was (1) that the agronomical problems offered no apparent difficulty, though considerable work would have to be carried out to establish optimum methods of planting, and (2) that, although the rubber could bo extracted in the laboratory by the solvont method, no commercial method was known. At this meeting it was decided that intensive investigations on the problem of extraction be started, and a good collection program be instituted immediately. 4 Following the above, a meeting was held in Mr. Auchter's office at which it was arranged that the Forest Service would provide funds for the Chemistry and Engineering Division of the USDA to carry out the extraction investigations. This work was put in charge of Dr. Eskew at the Philadelphia Regional Labora~ tories, and work there and at the Regional Laboratory in New Orleans was started. Also immediately following the meeting on June 22, Mr. Levy wrote to Mr. Polhamus requesting that the BPI undertake the seed collection on BEN's behalf. This was agreed to, $5,000 was allotted to BPI for the purpose, and Messrs. Jenkins and White of BEW were assigned to 3PI for a survey of the Cryptostegia areas. Subsequently, Mr. Gentry of BPI was also assigned to the work with Mr. White in Mexico, while Mr. Jenkins was sent to Jamaica and the West Indies. As of the date of this report they have made a rather complete survey of all areas known to contain wild plants from which seed might be gathered in Mexico and Central America. In some areas seeds are now ready to be cathered and a man has been dispatched to Mexico to supervise collection. More mon will be sent as purpose. seeds ripen in various areas. They will employ native labor for the We have followed every possible lead that gave promise of seeds from sources other than those already mentioned. A few seeds have already bean obtained from India and we are making efforts to get all that are obtainable there. Similarly we are making efforts to get all that are obtainable in Australia any Madagascar. We have authorized United Fruit to make purchases of what they are able to in Central America and will probably authorize them to make purchases in India. when and if new sources are reported, the Division will exert every influence to obtain information concerning them. On August 17 the BEW answering a request of the Baruch Committee regarding its activities in rubber, made the following statement with regard to Cryptostegia. "The most promising rubber bearing plant nov in its experimental stage is the Cryptostegia vine Meanwhile the BEW has to decide to increase experi- mental plantings of Cryptostegia immediately to the extent that seed is available." At that time neither our seed collection efforts nor the extraction experiments being conducted at Philadelphia offered grounds for unwarranted optimism. On September 2 the whole Cryptostegia picture took on a much more favorable appearance with a telephone call from Mr. Thomas Fennall of SHADA in Haiti, Mr. Fennell stated that he had located enough souds in Haiti for plantings of up to 100,000 acres within a year. In Haiti, where huge quantities of labor are available, Mr. Fennell urged the application of a unique of tapping method he had already tried experimentally and which promised yields at loast 250 pounds of rubber per acre per year. We asked Fonnoll to write us once at length about the tapping process and to sund someone to Washington at Mr. to negotiate a contract. Mr. Hill, Fennoll's assistant, and subsequently Fennell, came to Washington, a satisfactory contract was negotiated, and a directive sent to Rubber Reserve to executo the contract. 5. 144 the same time contacts with prospective contractors who had previously shown interest in Cryptostegia plantings were revived. On September 2 we renewed negotiations with Miles Sherover and have now brought them to a point where the proper authorization of Moxican authorities is being solicited. We continued and pressed negotiations with Banco Ejidal for faster action on its proposed planting contract. On September 3 we contacted United Fruit and have progressed to a point where we are now discussing the details of a contract for substantial plantings in Central America. We have held initial conversations with Standard Fruit and are awaiting their ability to come to Washington regarding plantings in Honduras. Extraction. The extraction process worked out by Fennell has limitations because it is untried on a largo scale and because he estimates it will require about one man per acre constantly to perform the gathering operations. We have, therefore, continued our vigorous efforts to evolve a large scale extraction method. Although he Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry and Enginooring, seemed to be proaching the problem from every possible angle, we decided to employ an outside consultant to evaluate the work, to check its progross, and possibly to delegate some phases of it to other laboratorios. On September 16 WO discussed this thought with Dr. Ernst Hauser of M. I. T., and Bradley Doway of Dowoy and Almy, chemists of Cambridgo, Mass., to try to onlist Dowoy as a consultant, and the M.I.T. laboratories and Dr. Hauser to pursue specific problems. As a result of this conference, we were encouraged to believe that Mr. Dowey would undertake tho assignment, but his appointment to Mr. Jeffers' staff made his acceptance impossiblo. In a lottor written to our Mr. Robort J. Levy, Assistant Chiof, on Soptombor 29, Mr. Dowey explained his position, but offered to assist us in finding the right man to sorvo as a consultant. Mr. Dowey suggosted that oven before a consultant was appointed ccific problems on both extraction and rubbor be delogated to outside laboratories. this connection Dr. Ernst Hauser and Dr. B. E. Proctor, both of M.I.T., have boon interviewed and have indicated their willingness to be of service. Dr. Hausor is presently thinking about a pilot plant location for use in expanding the work of the Eastern laboratorios in somo area where larger quantitios of Cryptostogia are available. We are looking for such a plant location now. Our Dr. Walker is now in Moxico partially for that purposo. In Cryptostegia grandiflora is a perennial. If latex removal is accomplished by tapping the vinos as contemplated by SHADA in Haiti, rubbor production will be a year around continuous operation. If latox recovery is accomplished by somo factory method the vinos will quickly rogain the foliage lost in operations. In either caso compotent opinion is that the vino once planted will produce over a considerable period of years. The best opinion indicates that in the plantation type of operation Cryptostogia vines will be ready for some harvesting mothod in approximately 12 months. Some servers have estimated as low as six months; others as high as 14 months. Twelve onths is therefore a conservativo average. Independent Research. Phases of agronomical and extraction work are also being conducted by outside agencies. Mr. McGavack of the U. S. Rubber Company is doing of in montioned to give an of experiments at Yuma Trumbull of Goodrich, at Akron; Mr. Johnson Goodycar, Costa and Rica. Passaic; Those Mr. are idea of named the extent us interest in Cryptostogia. Unquostionably there are others. Those koop formed as to the progress and results of their work. -6 Recent Opinions on Cryptosteria as our Emergency Source of Rubber. Baruch plants Report: "Cryptostegia is second in importance among rubbor producing is littleetc to be lost " and much might be gained by pursuing this programThere vigorously, Dr. P. A. Wells, Director of Eastern Laboratory, Bureau of Agricultural Chemistry and Engineering, in conversation with Atherton Lee, BEW Agricultural Advisor, on September 28, 1942: "Any planting program should not be delayed for fear of obtained." inability to extract the rubber. One way or another the methods will be Charles S. Dolley, Biologist and Chemical Engineer to Bernard Baruch, wrote on August 21, 1942: "I continued independent attempts to grow it on a large scale in Mexico and finally went to the Bahamas where I grew it successfully and value as the quickest growing plant producing high demonstrated grade rubber its great There is no need of colayful experiments." Thomas A. Fennell of SHADA wrote to Robert J. Levy, Rubber Division, BEW, on September 16, 1942: "Cryptostegia offers an excellent chance to produce good rubber fast with very little steel, skilled labor, or other strategic materials. Mr. Sorenson (Department of Agriculture) estimates the cost of production of rubber by tapping the stems of Cryptostegia would not be in excess of 30 cents to 40 cents per pound.' 1942: Dr. John McGavack of U.S. Rubber Company wrote to Mr. Levy on October 1, "I am deeply sympathetic with any movement to get larger areas of Cryptostegia planted, whether they be United Fruit, whothor they be Haiti's schome, or whother they be other places. Thank you very much for your help." 145 BL-10-b SECRET TRADE POLICY TOTARD SWEDEN Copy 13 A REPORT AND RECOMBENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF ECONOMIC WARFARE SUBMITTED BY THE STAFF OF THE BOARD AND APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTATIVES FROM OTHER AGENCIES REPRESENTED ON THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON SWEDEN T. K. Finletter, Department of State SECRET Captain W. D. Puleston, Navy Department J. Coppock, War Production Board Mr. H. H. Neff, representing the War Depart- ment, dissented. November 5, 1942 At the meeting of the Board of Economic Warfare on May 21, a subcommittee on Sweden was appointed to obtain and review information which would provide the basis for a unified policy to be followed by the agencies of the United States' Government. On the basis of the information made available, particularly through an intensive investigation in London by Mr. William T. Stone, Assistant Director of the Board of Economic Warfare, the following policy conclusions and recommendations are made: 1. Policy Conclusions. In the final analysis it is a matter of opinion whether a complete stoppage of trade with Sweden by the United Nations and the countries of this hemisphere would result in a decrease of Swedish aid to the enemy. In the view of the British Government, however, such a decrease would probably not take place and increased Swedish aid to the enemy is more likely to follow. Such a stoppage of trade, besides shutting off certain important material sent from Sweden to the United Nations, might adversely affect the determination and the ability of the Swedes to resist Axis aggression. This consideration must be judged in the light of the possible military value to the United Nations of a strengthened Swedish army and the fact that a substantial part of the productive capacity of Sweden is absorbed in its armament program. A complete and permanent cessation of trade would make it difficult for the United Nations to bargain with Sweden in order to obtain certain military and economic concessions important to our interests. Trade relations with Swoden, however, are not now satisfactory. Certain violations of the Anglo-Swedish War Trade Agreement appear to have taken, and to be taking, place: -2- 1380 Exports to the enemy of some important stratogic commodities have substantially increased above the "normal" 1938 level of exports to Germany despite the prohibitions which seem to be stipulated in the Agreement; and it does not appear that in fact enemy-occupied Scandinavian countrios havo been strictly treated as belligerent territory. Cortain exceptions which have been and are being permitted in the War Trade Agreement itself, as well as in its application, are benefitting the enemy: Imported commodities are permitted export to the enomy as components of manufactured goods. In some cases without adequate control those imported commodities are exported in their original form through special bartor deals or processing and reimport arrangements made with the enemy. Moreover, the prohibitions on the export of commoditios do not extend to all goods which Sweden obtains through the blockade, nor do they include certain Swedish commodities similar in character to these imports. Although delivorios from the Axis have with increasing frequency fallen far short of the promised amounts, Swedish exports to the enomy are maintained at a high level, not only by artificial increases in Gorman prices but also by means of large governmental credits which in 1942 may be estimated at 300 million kronen. This is about one-fourth of the total value of Swedish exports (goods and shipping services) to the enemy. The Swodish Government has also permitted and continues to countenance certain practices which directly assist the enerry in the conduct of its military operations: Soon after the opening of hostilities betwoon Russia and Germany, Swoden capitulated to strong pressure and permitted a fully-armed Gorman division to cross Swedish territory to Finland. This concession has not sinco been repeated, but German troops on leave and war materials continue to pass across Swoden to Norway and Finland. In 1941, 250,000 Gorman soldiors travollod in each direction and 250,000 tons of war materials were carriod through Swoden to the Axis' northern fronts. In 1942, this traffic has increased considerably and, in addition, Swodish torritorial waters have boon used for enomy military traffic escorted by Swedish naval vessels. Swedish railways are also utilized for movement of Gorman troops between southern and northern Norway and bctween Norway and Finland. -3- 146 2. Policy Recommendations. The present sorious situation with regard to trade relations betwoon the United Nations and Swodon should be corrected by a more positivo and drastic policy than has heretofore been adopted by this Government; for example, by suppression or diminution of imports into Swoden. However, in the process of bargaining, but only on condition that substantial objectivos can be immodiately achieved thereby, it may be advisable to offer the Swodes certain concessions such as "basic rations" of some imported goods and the assurance of special supplies including petroleum needed for the Swedish armed forces. It is, therefore, recommended that this Government pursue by negotiation a policy immediately designed to attain the following principal objectives: a. A strict enforcement of the War Trade Agreement and modifications thereof where necessary, which would put an end to the violations and exceptions mentioned above. Modifications should include the reduction of certain blockade quotas for Swedish overseas imports which are excessive, and elimination where practicable of commodities imported from overseas which enter into Swedish production for the enemy. b. An increase in the flow of strategic materials from Sweden to the United Nations, and coopera- tion by the Swedes in the matter of substantial purchases by the United Nations for preclusive purposes as well as for supply. C. Assistance by the Swedes in effecting transport by sea and air for materials from Sweden to the United Nations. d. Satisfactory arrangements for the use by the United Nations not only of Swedish shipping at present outside the Baltic but also for the vessels built or being built by Sweden. e. Elimination or substantial reduction of Swedish Government credits, direct or indirect, to enomy countries. f. Access to full information on Swodish exports to and imports from enemy torritory. g. The conclusion of negotiations satisfactory to the Department of State, whoreby the Swedish Govern- ment shall agree to equalize its export trade with the other American republics in such manner that, if Sweden limits its export trade to any American republic or republics, Swedish exports to other American republics to which exports are not so limited shall be correspondingly reduced. h. The conclusion of negotiations satisfactory to the War Shipping Administration, for the chartering by the War Shipping Administration of Twenty-one Swedish vessels now in this hemisphere. i. A substantial reduction, the maximum attainable, in the number of enemy troops on leave now permitted to pass through Swedish territory, and a stipulation that no troops be permitted to travel through Sweden to Finland. j. A substantial reduction, the maximum attainable, in the military traffic of materials now permitted to pass through Swedish territory, and a stipulation that no military traffic or materials be permitted through Sweden to Finland. k. A substantial reduction, the maximum attainable, or elimination of German military traffic in Swedish territorial waters and of the use of Swedish convoys by the enemy. 1. A reduction in the iron ore exports from Sweden to enemy territory from the current figuro of about nine and a half million tons annually to normal pre-war exports to Germany. The most important objective, namely, a substantial reduc- tion in the shipments of iron ore from Sweden to territory to the extent desired direct military cannot be A action. attained except through enemy decision in this matter is beyond the scope of the authority of the staff of the Board and the Sub-Committee. must be emphasized that the ore important single in to Germany by any nation outside of its use of military action to cut down Swedish exports of iron ore is not precluded by the terms of the War Trade Agreement. material, borders. Nevertheless, is the most The made it contribution, traffic terms of of pre-war raw iron It is accordingly recommended that the Board of Economic Warfare adopt a resolution calling for the trade including the shipment of commitments, secret or and immediate concessions with in exchange Sweden, for petroleum otherwise, continuance products of of by the Swedish Government, to meet the objectives this Government set forth in sub-paragraphs A - L of these 147 -5- Recommendations, and that this policy be carried out in consultation with the interested agencies by the Board of Economic Warfare in collaboration with the Department of State.* *The following momorandum interpreting -the above document was sont on October 31, 1942 to the Chairman of the Sub-Committee on Sweden by Captain W. D. Puleston representing the Navy Department on said Committee: 1. In view of the froquent use of the words, "substantial," "satisfactory," "substantial reduction," "negotiations satisfactory," which are capable of various interpretations, I wish to make plain my understanding of those recommendations. 2. Such an understanding is particularly necessary for as the report was being written a dispatch from the American Embassy in London was received which recommended that a full cargo of miscellaneous petroleum products, somo of them very important from a strategic viewpoint, be provided at once for the Swedish stoamer SVEADROTT. In view of Sweden's confessed inability to fulfill her previous engagements (which fact was brought out more than once during the sub-committee's sessions), I am convinced that no further shipments of petroloum or potroleum products should be made to Sweden until Sweden has actually complied with the objectives out- lined in sub-paragraphs (a) to (1). 3. I accordingly recommend that the American nogotiators be instructed that no further petroleum products be given to Swoden prior to April 1, 1943. If by March 1, 1943, Swoden has substantially complied with the objoctivos outlined in sub-paragraphs (a) to (1), arrangements could be mado to furnish the first quarter's allotmont of potroleum products to Sweden by April 1, 1942. 4. I wish to emphasize that the use of military, naval or air forces to cut down the Swodish exports are not procluded by any of these recommondations. 5. I also recommend that betwoon now and March 1, 1943 quiot offorts be made by the United Nations to reduco the present increasing flow of grains, moats and odible oils from South America (mainly Argentina) to Sweden via the Gothenberg route. In my opinion, the objectivos in sub-paragraphs (a) to (1) are temporary. They should be extended as soon as the political, military and naval factors permit. The United Nations should not be content with anything loss then the complete supression of Swodish trado with Germany. 4000 at sun bottom and yoffor till teath bara fresh ord add 20To three were andyou when RE dollar other Ise *.00.00 mea mode od only refund no with to wild by sale If no you its mild a . alamy Vd about of 2th our arti to watv at was obtained at alamy 6 date 1. would brown To ots dollar prodit to V (to inDEA of SOUTH ITS 2057 done stogo add .. To1on thatInbetteros 251 nobat.ah non toda suraLossing zannose sin&Some side same the babby nd intoqwolv olgatanto moit senior ad was Codeal house'Inco e'stobay& to note at casto Mark aron with Highand 8.01 on dest XAX elimobason add och of on toI medication Togribrub the will with bollegor cad stobowa Ithm reberra: (1) of (i) me boards oid acid tudd I ( with one w Limit robert at to .2 nobotia interests and anoforchoq outside Descountant - and stafford real of dozal get 3I. edec " of saing 03 ohso ad MINOS ((1) of - youbide to DBS nde the of direct I as we is 500 class SPECIMEN distrove and was data at monto? the world to you ever in no von monished dail OBLA I .2 out couldn't of 11 bothau with that obera od dates most) alto oldtho Nra. includes to noil got paid (aotaboo Yes mL and on told sity at information godT oze (c) at (1) AI Demon New Sobbition ord DA ad and state x don C.G off HOOS. battle biff was the delhave to adalement add and SECRET BL-10 Rev.2 SECRET Copy BOARD OF ECONOMIC WARFARE Office of Economic Warfare Analysis TRADE POLICY TOWARD SWEDEN A Summary of the Essential Facts on Sweden's Relations with the Enemy and with the Area outside the Blockade Revised Version November 3, 1942 24 148 T12932 S,veil 01418 149052 2000 BOATHA GRACE to 002730 about and ODLATION 2016 noticel beaivail SIDE s 149 CONTENTS Page Trade Policy toward Sweden: 1-5 A Summary of the Essential Facts on Sweden's Relations with the Enemy and with the Area outside the Blockade Annexes A. Estimate of Sweden's Trade Balance, 1936, 1938 6 and 1940-42 (Table) B. Distribution of Sweden's Trade within the 7 Blockade Area, 1936, 1938, and 1940-42 (Table) C. The Anglo-Swodish War Trade Agreement 8-10 D. Exports from Sweden to Argentina and other South American Republics during the First Seven Months of 1942 (Table) 11 E. List of Materials Safely Shipped from Sweden to the United Kingdom from Jan. 1, 1941 12 through June, 1942 (Table) F. Materials Imported by the United Kingdom by Air from Sweden during the Month of August 13 1942 (Table) G. Swedish Exports to Enemy Destinations, First Six Months of 1942 (Table) H. Principal Swedish Exports to Germany and Oc- 14-15 16-18 cupied Europe, 1938 as Compared with 1941 and the First Six Months of 1942 (Table) I. Swedish National Income Compared with Goods and Services Furnished the Enemy and Expenditures for National Defense, 1941 (Table) 19 Page J. Blockade Quotas and Principal Commodities Imported through the Blockade by Sweden during the First Six Months of 1942 (Table) 20-21 K. Swedish Imports from Enemy Territory Lathronad L. Swedish Credit Contributions to the Axis M. Swedish Petroleum Position treatment edd 22-23 to prolister 24-25 26-28 150 TRADE POLICY TOWARD SWEDEN A Summary of the Essential Facts on Sweden's Relations with the Enemy and with the Area Outside the Blockade* I. Sweden's Economic Position Sweden is under a double blockade. In the Atlantic, AngloAmerican supremacy controls access to overseas sources of supply while German supremacy determines her ability to trade with continental Europe. Because of her geographic position, Sweden lios almost entirely within Germany's economic orbit: her dependence upon continental sources for coal and other raw materials has made it possiblo for the Axis to obtain about 90 per cent of Sweden's curront exports while supplying only about two-thirds of her imports. However, Swodon has not become a complete economic province of the enemy. Over 22 por cont of Swedish national income is spont on armament production and tho maintonance of armed forces. According to the American Legation at Stockholm, the Swodish Government and people continuo to uso the bargaining power at their disposal to rosist Axis oconomic pressure. II. Rolations with the Enomy 1, Trade a. The principal economic contribution made by Swoden to the Axis is the oxport of high grado iron oro (9.5 million tons in 1941), wood products (particularly pulp wood and rayon pulp), machinory, ball boarings and othor specialty manufactures of tho motallurgical industry, and food to Finland. b. About 12 por cent of the total Swodish national incomo is comprisod of exports of goods and sorvicos to onomy torritory. Although Swodish exports to onomy torritory appoar to bo loss (value adjusted) than they wore to *This summary is mado with tho following qualification: Although the United States and British Governments have sought to obtain completo trado information, preciso data are not yot availablo on certain questions. The Swodish Government, however, has recontly supplied moro dotailed statistics and has givon assurance of its willingness to communicate fullor documentation. 2 the same area before the war, her exports of the particu- lar commodities most urgently needed by the enemy far exceed pre-war shipments to Germany. This is particularly true for rayon pulp and pulp wood which have increased many times over while the export of other products less useful to the enemy has decreased significantly. Similarly, the occupied countries import much less from Swedon than they did before the war. O. If exports of Swedish iron ore and wood products particularly could be eliminated, the enemy's war effort would be severely injured. In terms of iron content, the high grade Swedish ore delivered in 1941 amounted to 18 per cont of the total available to Germany, but actually the Swedish oro is even more important than this ratio indicates: the loss of the Swedish supply would require the mining and transport additionally of 20 million tons of low grade German and French ore, of 6 million tons of coal and 4 million tons of coke. Loss of the Swedish wood products would materially reduce the alroady restricted supply of textiles in Axis Europe and would tend further to reduce agricultural production (by tho loss of paper binding twine) and mining output (by the loss of pit props). 2. Crodits Sinco Swoden's imports from the enemy area are doclining and aro currently almost ono-third loss in valuo (adjusted) than were exports to Axis Europo and because Swodish shipping sor- vicos further incroaso tho Axis indebtodness, this unbalanced trado is enabled to continuo only by virtuo of largo credits granted by the Swodish Government. It is ostimated that tho crodits during 1942 to Gormany and Finland will amount to at loast 300 million kronor, so that about one-fourth of the Swodish oxports of goods and sorvices to the onomy is financod through Swodish crodits. Virtually all exports to Finland aro crodit transactions, whothor mado directly or through un- componsated Swodish exports to Donmark which onablo tho lattor country to provido goods for Finland. In addition, thoro are forcod crodits to the onomy arising out of the artificial inflation of Gorman export pricos. To the extont in Gorman pricos oxcoods that in Swodish pricos, virtually boon a crodit in dif- actual amount cannot bo oxactitudo on foronco. flation thoro the has basis factor The of oqual computed amount with that to the tho in- tho information now availablo, but addi- of about 200 million kronor If this concoaled crodit tho about 40 por cont of Swedish of and diroct prico tional sorvices difforential. crodit, crodit to may exports bo is addod duo an to goods to this by the the onomy may bo ostimated to bo uncomponsated onomy's exports to Swodon. These credits, regarded by 151 3 the British Ministry of Economic Warfare as unneutral, not only relieve Germany of the need to carry the full burden of export, but also tend to help Finland remain in the war. 3. Military Although the Swedish Government states that it has resisted German efforts to compromise her neutrality, certain concessions made to the enemy have directly assisted the Axis in the conduct of the war. A definite breach of Swedish neutral- ity was permitted in July, 1941, when a fully equipped German division was allowed to cross Sweden from Norway to Finland. This breach has not been repeated, but the Swedish Government continues to permit German troops and materials to pass across Sweden to and from Norway and Finland, between southern and northern Norway and between Norway and Finland. The troops, presumably on leave, cross in sealed cars. In 1941, 250,000 journeys in each direction were made across Swedish territory and 250,000 tons of war materials were carried in transit through Sweden to Norway and Finland. In 1942, this traffic has apparently increased and, in addition, Swedish territorial waters have been used for enemy military traffic con- voyed by Swedish naval vessels. 4. Shipping Swedish shipping within the Baltic (more than half of her total merchant marine) is at the disposal of the enemy and plays an important role, particularly in carrying iron ore to Axis Europe. The Swodish Government has refused to force these ships into Axis service, but permits them to be charterod by the enomy if a satisfactory rate can be agreed upon between the owner and the German Government. III. Relations with the United Nations 1. Trade a. The Anglo-Swodish War Trade Agreement, signod on Docombor 7, 1939, and modified by a supplomontary protocol of Decombor, 1941, permits Swodon to import commoditios from areas outsido of the blockado in quantitios ostablishod by quotas which are basod gonorally on the amount of goods imported by Swodon in 1938. In oxchango for thoso import facilitios, Swodon has agrood to cortain prohibitions and limitations on hor exports which are intondod to provont the rooxport of importod commoditios and, boyond the 1938 lovol, of indigonous products. Both the import quotas and rostrictions on exports are subjoct to chango and roconsidoration at any timo. The import quotas roprosont 4 substantial proportions of Sweden's normal consumption of food stuffs and industrial materials, and in the case of petroleum provide the total amount needed for maintenance of the military forces and combat reserves. Although many of the quotas have not been filled, the imports of cotton, wool, hides, vegetable oils, fodder, cereals and colonial produce are not only among the scarcest goods in Europe today but undoubtedly enable Sweden to main- tain its economy. If they were cut off, serious economic repercussions would be felt in all sectors of Swedish production. b. During the first six months of 1942, Swoden imported from outside the blockade area goods valued at about 230 million kronen ($57,000,000), whereas she exported to areas outside the blockade goods valued at 110 million kronen ($27,000,000). Sweden's exports through the blockade are subject to German permission in each case and are confined at the present time to Argentina and Chile because of a prohibition imposed by the enomy on Swedish exports to the United Nations. However, through blockado-running and the air service between Stockholm and Scotland, the United Kingdom has received during the eightoon months procoding July 1942 certain metals and manufacturos which are re- garded by the British Government as being of great importance to their war offort. Although those imports may not be irreplaceable, and their significance appears to have been somewhat exaggeratod, they consist mainly of parts for Swedish machinery in Britain which could only with difficulty be manufactured elsowhere. Exports per- mitted by Gormany from Swedon to Agrontina and Chilo consist mainly of wood pulp, paper and iron and stool manufactures. C. The blockado quotas appear in sovoral instances to pormit excessivo imports of cortain commoditios and in somo casos directly onable Swodon to export goods to tho onomy. Howovor, actual imports through tho blockado havo boon limited both by the difficulty Swodon has found in procuring commoditios and also by the fact that the Gothonburg traffic (pormittod by the Unitod Nations and tho Axis) is limited to fivo ships a month in oach direction and ono tankor oach quartor. d. In gonoral, although thoro are cortain doficioncios in the list of prohibitod exports, goods imported from outsido the blockado may not bo oxportod to the onomy. Tho potroloum products pormittod to pass through the blockado to Swodon may only bo used by tho Swodish armod forcos. Thoro aro, novortholoss, goods imported through the blockado 5 which do in fact contribute to the enemy's war effort indirectly as components of manufactured goods or as sup- plies used to maintain the health and efficiency of the Swedish working population. Moreover, despite the apparent stipulation of the War Trade Agreement, exports to the enemy of indigenous commodities like iron ore and wool products have increased above the level of 1938 exports to Germany. 2. Shipping Sweden contributes to the United Nations a sizeable fleet of merchant vessels which are, directly or indirectly, performing services for the United Nations. Some 400,000 tons of Swedish shipping outside the Baltic are either on charter to the United Nations or subject to our shipping directives, and negotiations are now under way to bring an additional 94,000 tons of shipping outside the Baltic undor the direct control of the United Nations. 3. Military Although the military authorities of the Unitod States have not yet indicated whether the maintenance or strongthening of the Swedish armed forces is of strategic importance, the British Government appears to rogard the Swodish army and navy as of positivo valuo to the United Nations eithor as a deterrent to furthor Axis aggression in the Scandinavian region or as a defensivo force which could, if engaged in battle, exact a heavy toll. 152 ANNEX A ESTIMATE OF SWEDEN'S TRADE BALANCE, 1936, 1938, AND 1940-42 (in millions of kronor) 1936 1938 1940-41* 1941-42* Adjusted** Adjusted** A. Trade Outside the Blockedc Area a. Imports through the Blockado b. Exports through the Blockado C. Surplus of Imports (f) or Exports (-) B. Trade Inside the Blockado Area a. Imports from Enony Territory b. Exports to Enemy Territory 755 1065 330 220 310 200 750 910 130 85 155 80 75 /155 /200 /145 /155 /120 880 1015 600 765 930 1345 1015 685 1250 1145 425 600 /85 +330 -85 /105 -175 C. Surplus of Imports (f) or Exports (-) /115 6 C. Total Trade Balance a. Imports b. Exports 1635 1515 C. Surplus of Imports (+) or Exports (-) 120 2080 1840 1675 820 1145 770 1560 1300 625 680 /240 /530 /50 /260 -55 *May 1 to April 30 *The figures for 1940-41 and 1941-42 are given in their adjusted form because of the radical price changes which heve taken place during the war. In 1941 Swoden had to DAY about 140 nor cont more for her imported goods and obtained only 60 per cont more for her exports than in 1936. This difference was duc not solely to German bergaining strength but also to the fact that import values include freights whereas exports do not. Beltic freight rates increased from an index of 100 in 1939 to 340 in 1941. In the caso of trade outside the blockadc area relatively slight adjustments have been made in import values. 154 7 ANNEX B DISTRIBUTION OF SWEDEN'S TRADE WITHIN THE BLOCKADE AREA 1936, 1938 AND 1940-42 (in millions of kronor) 1936 Total Imports from Enemy Territory Germany (including Austria) Scandinavian countries Italy West European countries]/ South European countries2 Hungary Others Total Exports to Enemy Territory Germany (including Austria) Scandinavian Countries Italy West European countriesl South European countries2 Hungary Others 1 1938 1940-41 1.345 1941-42 1,250 830 1,015 370 455 830 805 140 160 150 130 10 30 135 110 205 225 20 7 155 130 55 50 45 50 15 20 115 85 1,015 1,145 765 930 245 335 530 535 240 290 265 315 20 40 75 90 175 200 55 85 10 10 65 10 15 70 95 20 2 63 ) The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, France, Portugal, and Spain. 2 Yugoslavia, Rumania, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, and Albania. 0 KOREA BOAKDOJE and STREET START arizadama to SOME NEPS edges (month to anoth. (it) - 025, LOCARE BEER are yeer $0.1 OUR eea DEF 221 DEI ORE occ OIL REE DE OLI of 02 ce ess EDS 00 23 as of 28 USE galbilonk) ECONOO calvantbaro2 Cloti statements fanily as s 223 DEA PROVISION viete of 265 EAR GPS OR 28 (3) 22 or CPI or OF or ZP of 20 s la data clast \fastatures deall 050090 hine out If brue charges Is alaoa 8 155 ANNEX C THE ANGLO-SWEDISH WAR TRADE AGREEMENT The Anglo-Swedish War Trade Agreement, signed on December 7, 1939, has not only been modified since that time by a supplementary protocol of December 1941 but also by agreements made in the Joint Standing Commission established under the agreement. Events, too, have made their mark on the Agreement: after the occupation by Germany of Norway and Denmark, permission was obtained from the British Government for a limited shipping, service to the port of Gothenburg of five ships and one tanker a quarter in each direction. Also, a quota system was established for Swedish imports from overseas, these quotas being based generally on the quantity of goods imported by Sweden in 1938. At present, therefore, the War Trade Agreement consists es- sentially of the following series of regulations: A. Import quotas. B. A list of goods prohibited export to the enemy. C. A list of imported goods permitted export to the enemy as components of manufactures if less than 12 per cent of the value of the finished manufacture. D. A list of other goods which may be exported to the enemy in "normal" 1938 quantities. These prohibitions and restrictions, however, may in some cases be set aside (according to the Protocol of December 1941) in order to permit Sweden to have goods processed in enemy territory and returned, these arrangements requiring approval in each case by the Joint Standing Commission. Also, the Joint Standing Commission has set aside these prohibitions and restrictions in certain cases where the Swedish Government desires to export to the enemy in exchange for war materials imported from the enemy. Examination of the War Trade Agreement and the administrative practice thereunder leads not only to the conclusion that the above prohibitions leave loopholes permitting Sweden to contribute to the enemy's war effort with the aid of imported materials but also that the text of the agreement apparently has been interpreted in some cases so as to permit greator=than-normal exports to the enemy. A. Several of the existing import quotas appear to be excessivo in view of presont information on Swedish requirements. The following major changos soom to bo required: 9 Commodity (Metric tons unless otherwise stated) Present British Rice and rice groats Maize and maize meal Wheat, rye and their flours Dried fruits Sugar Vegetable, animal and fish oils - edible only - Hides skins and leather Artificial textile fibres Quarterly Quota 4,000 33,000 22,500 3,750 5,000 Recommended Quota 3,000 15,000 10,000 500 -1,500 2,000 14,000 3,000 wyarns and piece goods- Casein 5,000 1,500 nil nil 186 175 Silver nil 6 B The list of prohibited exports does not include all goods im- ported from overseas or all Swedish manufactures which are made in significant part from, are derived directly from, or are similar to goods imported from overseas. The principal omissions in this list of prohibited exports seem to be as follows: Bread and other food prepara- tions Roasted coffee Textile fibres and manufactures, including artificial fibres and manufactures Animal hair Bristles and brush-making fibre, brushes, etc. Eggs Cheese Honey Fish and marine oil Cellulose fodder Iodine and iodidos (medical) Borax Boric acid Firearms and guns Paints, varnishes, etc., and paint components Tire Fabric Insulated cable and wire Fishing nets Colophony Tin oxide Plywood Chemicals for photography Fertilizers Tar oils Magnesite Lead alloys and ore Spark plugs Antimony, alloys and ore Mica and manufactures Tin plate and tin plate scrap Silver metal, alloys and scrap Textitle machinery and parts, etc. Tartaric acid and lees Automotive vehicles--parts and ac- Starches cessories Gum arabic, kamar, kauri, etc. Explosives Dextrine Soap Furs and fur skins Ammunition, projectiles and fuses Talc Asbestos and manufactures Graphite and graphito products Detonators Canned goods Fruit juices Abrasives and manufactures 156 10 C. Blockade quotas for imported materials (A) which are permitted export to the enemy as components of manufactures up to 12 per cent of the total value of the manufacture or (B) which are employed in the manufacturing processes of Swedish products permitted export to the enemy, should be reconsidered and the import of these materials so controlled as to limit them as far as practicable to Swedish domestic consumption. The principal quotas falling within these categories are as follows: Grass and field seeds Tung and oiticica oils Castor and rapeseed oils Glycering Oleic and other fatty acids Carnauba and other waxes Hides, skins and leather Borax and boric acid Tartaric acid and wine lees Rubber and manufactures Wool and manufactures Bristles and brush-making fibres Cotton raw, manufactures and waste Copper Lead Plasticisers Abrasives and manufactures Asbestos and manufactures Graphite and manufactures Solvent Industrial fibres (hemp, Acetone Casein Carbon black jute, sisal, ramie, etc.) and their manufactures Paints, varnish and shellac Toluol Petrolatum etc.) Textile machinery Paraffin wax Gum kopal, kauri, domar Tar oils (benzol, phenol, cresol, D. Exports limited to the 1938 level have not in the case of several of the most important commodities in fact been restricted to 1938 exports from Sweden to Germany. This loophole may perhaps be due to an interpretation of the War Trade Agreement made by the Swedes which tends to benefit the enemy. The principal commodities which appear to be allowed export in excess of the 1938 level of exports to Germany are: Iron ore Lumber Plywood Paper Rayon pulp Chemical pulpwood Both the processing arrangements and the barter arrangements permitting export of otherwise prohibited commodities to the enemy for return or exchange may benefit the enemy unless full information is given and the approval of the United States and British Governments is obtained. Moreover, unless a time limit is placed upon the transaction abuses may occur. In fact, because of lack of such information and of the time limit, it is virtually impossible to control such transactions. 201 Ladoug -4500 kisoexperience Holde (E) 10 the Moore oil) nd. blurredto outaris of at main an willon 80 2dakbova . of of as an of th as aoloo anada green 29 - or above Dour BRAZD alto brow good 100 has estable are and fatter basi address afto beenager bas totaab ships todo first alefo zerife base admaried Indiana and pabli brow alsod has are bloo 157 11 ANNEX D EXPORTS FROM SWEDEN TO ARGENTINA AND OTHER SOUTH AMERICAN REPUBLICS DURING THE FIRST SEVEN MONTHS OF 1942a (quantities in metric tons) Newsprint and newspaper Other paper and cardboard Timber and manufactures Iron and Steel Ball bearings Other iron and steel manufactures Electrical machinery and apparatus Other machinery Auto and truck parts Chemicals Chalk Accumulators Insulating sheets Furskins Glassware Wines and spirits Other goods a Source: Ministry of Economic Warfare To Argentina 55,500 8,300 24,300 1,370 21,600 8,250 22,400 810 400 790 1.3 3,000 1.3 1,950 725 500 240 150 14 12 880 460 150 50 48 120 120 2 2 - Woodpulp Total - Commodity 1 1 1 9 9 II a MADIREMA HTUGS Hallo GILL OF MEKRAWE 30. MINUKesser COLIBULES (anot at Into of 00a.IS 002.82 028,8 004,55 00E. doe.,AS OPT orea 002 0.09 E.S are 02.1 E.L 000,8 est DAS AI qluybool have braodbrao have Toqac bite Loate Base norl systemed The feats free not teddo authoragqa been IsolatosI3 radio advers NOUR have other 088 alsokado 02.1 OF OSS about S £ I e: ethilqs bets abook tedto 010270W to vista half :00 158 12 ANNEX E LIST OF MATERIALS SAFELY SHIPPED (a) FROM SWEDEN TO THE UNITED KINGDOM (b) FROM JANUARY 1, 1941, THROUGH JUNE 1942 Tubes and Solids for ball bearings 7,166 tons Finished ball bearings 1,220 n Special rods and wire in carbon, stainless and high speed qualities 2,249 If 874 Machinery 222 " Cold Rolled strip 1,981 Special quality ingots and billets 10,267 2,661 Bar iron if Charcoal pig iron 120 If Spare parts for marine engines 1,456 If 346 Sponge iron 28,562 Tons ( (quantity ( Total (value ft Ferrochrome $1,735,000 (a) In addition the following imports from Sweden were made by other British territories: Australia (to March 1942) Machinery & 53,000 Metals and manufactures Scientific instruments Canada (to April 1942 Bearings 11,000 3,500 395,000 Cream separaters 111,000 The above countries were the only recipients of Swedish imports in 1942: in 1941, the Union of South Africa and New Zealand obtained goods valued at 106,000 pounds and 21,500 pounds respec- tively. During the first six months of 1942, the United States received from Sweden through the blockade only 12 tons of ma- chinery and 1 ton of furs. (b) Source: Ministry of Economic Warfare SI. E (a) CENTING 50 TELI (d) Modernx GSTIMU HIP MECEWE MORE SMRE 2000 ser ..: MORT adidas against Liad 10% abtioa bas coder agatteed "fed" bedarms 1 ess, base custiments moderso as artis from abou Intoags bosqa qiata bottor blee if violatical : 130.1 welled Date stogat yotLany Largeg8 # 195,01 noti gig footed to Lee,s not THE il N as Bentgas october TOT aftag orenge If . devil a AM egroge and Wisney 000,005, . south vcl affirm : LadoT outLev) : fatting STEW national not art 201315bm aT (1) AtlantauA 000.00 : 000.11 002.8 000.208 - ber alstole will SAOE StagA at) shous!) agricult 000,JTT RESTO do administration hunters fullbow8 to stundginen Kino out error avoid ed? well time to add Lief set SAPE at sotate bothru abatoc 002.IS have abnor 000,301 da bestLey abooy bealet with to and and SAN to address us add Wovld SI rino nd righozis bevinger 100/1 to not : hre to Estated 1003008 (d) 159 13 ANNEX F MATERIALS IMPORTED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM BY AIR FROM SWEDEN DURING THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1942* Material Drilling Tools Spare Parts for Oil Engines -do- Antimagnetic Iron Milcrometers Spring Washers Micrometers -doValves Gross Weight Kilos 15.-2.23 .81 7.40 85.-0.30 45,-37.-- Vavles 0.61 59.90 54.70 4.80 Spring Steel Parts for Relays 23.-14.-- Grinders Parts for Chipping Hammers -do- 15.50 Striking Mechanism Spare parts 348.-- Taps 94.50 170.30 Springs for Drill 6hucks Magnet Steel Taps Spring Steel Anvils Gudgeon Pin Brgs. (Haifa) Spare Parts -doTools 7.57 0.60 364.-0.45 32.00 198.695 130.75 234.70 118.50 Taps Taps Micrometers Spring Steel -do- Parts for Mikrokators 25.-12.-89.80 475.-0.175 2,666. *It should be noted that the summer months are regarded as unfavorable for air traffic in this region, and that therefore these shipments do not fully reflect the magnitude of the imports received. n TADEX 7 TOXOBX THE MALTED knowle TO VII ENTRY CRISCHIED gross 12 THE LOOTS S'S ghoto-goyou OIT 6T ILON ido- per AWTARK but LOZ ARATOR 503.48 1 yeyere are 2120 730.30 LOVE 75*00 786°02 -00properties 2007.0 burpa want summar treef Item :4993 any& Sid (RETAR) glass 1944 170732 +go= 538'30 131⑇20 35th 712 O'S girls 1914 jobs : you 10x10 too street #IE upraing pe uopeg ppse are USA #2 got with pause IN GUT . Hyout may 1,010 $920.00 go MOR COTTA with or raborpo 160 14 ANNEX G KNOWN SWEDISH EXPORTS TO ENEMY DESTINATION FIRST SIX MONTHS, 1942 (All figures in metric tons) A. Commodities Imported Through the Blockade or Similar Thereto Commodities Quantities Exported to Enemy Destinations, Jan-June 1942 Cereals and preparations (1) Potatoos and root crops Sugars and syrups (2) Food preparations Fish Meat and animals for meat (3) Fodder Seeds for Sowing Fats and oils Wines and liquors Textile materials Copper metal, alloys and scrap Lead metal and scrap Tin metal, alloys and scrap Artificial grinding wheels Abrasive paper Explosives and matches (4) Gums and resins Rubber and manufactures (5) 13,075* 4,552 1,200 1,301 1,754 1,085* 196 383* 103 43 615 715** 237** 175 47 88 1,031 654 10.5 14 Boots and shoes (1) About 9,998 tons represent exchanges made with the enemy and approved by the British. The remainder, an apparent violation of the Agreement is unexplained. (2) Exported to Norway in exchange for fish, fish oil, etc. (3) Includes 2,100 head of horses exported to Germany. Since this was in excess of normal trade, the British protested but no adequate explanation has been received. (4) Of this amount, 450 tons were matches, 250 tons powder to Switzerland and 300 tons powder to Finland. (5) In an oral explanation to the American attache at Stockholm, rubber the Swedish Foreign Office-said that this was "largely belting on an exchange basis with Denmark.' 15 B. Commodities Not Imported Through the Blockade or Similar Thereto Commodities Quantities Exported to Enemy Destinations, Jan-June 1942 Iron ore Wood and manufactures (6) Pulp, paper, etc. Iron and steel, and manufactures (7) Coal tar (8) Stone and mineral manufactures Pottery and glass Chrome ore and ferrochrome 2,761,537 4 436,302 437,181 99,053 5,108 9,187 9,423 533 Manganese ore and ferromanganese Molybdenum and ferromolybdenum Ferrosilicon 85 19.5 2,477 Wolfram 10 Other metals and manufactures 865** Railway cars and material 371 Automobiles and trucks 913 Instruments, etc. 191 Tanning materials Chemicals and pharmaceutical products Machinery Electrical machinery and appliances 1,879 11,677 15,037 2,776 (6) Including an unexplained and unauthorized shipment of 18 tons of cork. (7) Including 21,591 tons of charcoal pig iron against promised German exports of 77,000 tons of coke pig iron. (8) Allegedly, partly made from German coal and partly coal tar sent to Norway to make impregnated sacks for caclium nitrate and electrodes imported by Sweden. + Complete statistics have not been given by the Swedish Govern- ment. It should also be noted that statistics for the first half of the year, especially in the caso of iron ore, represent a seasonal low because of Baltic shipping conditions. Shipments permitted, partially or ontirely, by the British Government as exceptions to the list of prohibited exports, by virtuo of the Protocol of December 1941 or other special arrangoments but not including the Processing Program. Shipmonts partially or entirely permitted by the British Governmont under the Processing Program or as a Swedish exchange against war materials from Gormany. 161 16 ANNEX H PRINCIPAL SWEDISH EXPORTS TO GERMANY AND OCCUPIED EUROPE, 1938 AS COMPARED WITH 1941 AND THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 1942 NOTE The accompanying table dealing with Swedish exports to Germany and German-Occupied Europe is obviously incomplete, but most of the significant Swedish exports to the enemy are included, with the excep= tion of ball bearings and machinery. Since 1939, Sweden has released only fragmentary trade statistics. The table has been constructed from the figures available from Sweden and from information derived from consular dispatches and Swedish technical publications. ar in XTIMA STATES DT Hardam EA DEPI 08090000 OMA EAPI SO IT'S TESTY 3HT CITA EAPI SPORT nathere d21w office ad'f at agowa Ban ACCEPTED of Mothers add to 780m ford ****** add delo error out of PEPI'sont8 hits egairaed Stad to noty above conditions This Sensator and achew2 There odj not befored nood and eldes edit NOT 2017 bon "ashbows not'l alds Instados albaws brea PRINCIPAL SWEDISH EXPORTS TO GERMANY AND TO GERMANY AND OCCUPIED EUROPE: 1938 AS COMPARED WITH 1941 AND THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 1942 1938 COMMODITY Iron ore Lumber (thousands of board feet) Rayon pulp Chemical pulpwood (cubic meters) Exports Exports to Germany proper to Germany prober Ferro-chrome Copper Ferro-siliconmanganese Tin 100,188 12,795 514,800 100,000 850,800 285,000 1,085 1,000,000 N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 2,700 825 100,000 (a) 120,000 4,500 (b) Exports to Germany proper 2,747,957 310,201 (f) 93,332 (f) N.R. N.R. 127,000 (g) N.R. Exports to Germany and Occuried Europe 2,747,957 (h) N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 17 14,888 17,537 12,598 2,339 (c) 2,650 5,897 749 Chrome ore Lead 243 N.R. Not reported Occuried Europe 9,549,044 (d) (e) Ferro manganese Gormany and N.R. Unmanufactured and semi-manufactured Iron and Steel Charcoal pig iron Pyrites Ferro-silicon Exports to 8,945,088 Pit props (cubic meters) 68,000 Paper Plywood 1942 (6 months) 1941 - N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 38,000 33,000 25,735 11,406 3,649 2,986 N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 945 - 479 172 172 203 239 275 47 .47 - 237 20,000 (b) 20,000 (g) - 77,000 (b) N.R. - 1,870 2,459 450 486 693 715 - 10,310 10 a/ 1940, figures for 1941 not available b Estimate c/ In 1938 total exports to all destinations were only 10,870 including about 4,000 tons to Great Britain d Total exports of unprocessed tin were 9.7 tons, none to Germany 167 e/ No exports to any destination in 1938 f/ Sales in 1942 on six months basis g/ Six months estimated on the basis of nine months exports h/ The first six months represent the seasonal low. Exports are being maintained at the 1941 level. 163 19 ANNEX I SWEDISH NATIONAL INCOME COMPARED WITH GOODS AND SERVICES FURNISHED THE ENEMY AND EXPENDITURES FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, 1941 (in millions of kronen) 1941 National Income 12,000 Per cent 100 National Income, excluding profes- sions, services (except trans. port) and domestic commerce 8,500 Value of Exports to the Enemy Value of Shipping Services for 1,200 Enemy Value Expended on National 80 (100) 200 1,400* 12 (16) 2, 700 22 Defense *The money value of Swedish railroad facilities to the enemy in transport of troops on leave and materials has not been computed, but it probably does not at most exceed 100 million kronen. ex I the - and adidas ST SCOOD NITH DRE ROPE / QHA DATE EHT Consistent 10 anolitim al) our becom2 gifty [tock moon] Increation devezo) conEvies consemes oldeoush bas (from great8 outto to activy 302 gient (ac) to offs) of have datteed to mitor goods add and alabates more avant mo around 10 all values 700 the 200 and 12 2nd Hood for 00,1 164 20 ANNEX J BLOCKADE QUOTAS AND PRINCIPAL COMMODITIES IMPORTED THRU THE BLOCKADE BY SWEDEN DURING THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 1942 (a) (Quantities in metric tons) Commodity Blockade Quota (6 months) Theat and other cereals Meat (port, fresh & salted) Dried fruits Coffee Cocoa Spices (including pepper) Oil cake and meal Fodder Animal and vegetable oils Castor, tung, citicia and rapeseed oils Fatty acids Carnauba Wax 158,200 Total Imports thru Blockade Imports From U.S. Ratio Blockade Quota to Consumption (1938 Basis) 7,500 24,000 2,500 63,800 2,450 3,730 5,400 1,720 600 520 60,000 5,000 28,000 28,700 840 840 - 27,400 150 64% R.I. 360 10) 500 250 -) 3,000 (b) 80 (c) 6,000 2,000 3,700 23% 30 91% 10% 63% 71% 3 - 74% 33% (h) - - 22 420 30% 5 40% (1) Rubber and manufactures 2,150 Hides, skins and leather 3,000 (d) 4,200 Raw wool and wool tops (clean basis) 3,430 3,920 77 61% 18,000 1,750 4,000 2,400 2,500 12,900 180 99% 390 32 1,460 630 117 68 260 150 Raw cotton Wool manufactures Cotton manufactures Cotton waste Sisal Coir fibre Binder twine Kapok Brush-making fibres etroleum products (including Aviation fuel) Asphalt Paraffin wax R.I. Nil 120 (e) 290 30,000 11,400 500 14 39% 9 700 500 - - - 500 - 26 300 74,400 (f) - - 123 74,400 (f) 2,000 Copper 5,000 (g) Lead 8,000 1,000 Toluol 360 Carbon black Shellac 180 Casein 350 100 4% 750 750 88% (1) 100 100 17% - Asbestos (raw) Asbestos manufactures 57% (1) 99% (1) 57% (1) - 11 11 - 50 203 203 114 114 73 22 143 80% 49% 17% 63% - 73 13% 22 99% 143 60% 21 R.I. Referred item, shipments considered individually (a) (b) (c) Source: Ministry of Economic Warfare This figure is not regular quota but represents a single ship ment permitted by aGreat Britain. Quota includes other animal, vegetable and-insect waxes. (d) First quarter only, second quarter under consideration, (a) Includes ramie. (f) Permission was given by the Blockade Committee in London enabling Sweden to take the entire annual quota during the first two quarters, and also to receive a supplementary amount (14,000 tons) remaining from the 1941 quota. (g) (h) Semi-annual quota based on quota granted beginning with third quarter of 1942. Oil cake derived from imported seeds is not included in the Blockade quota for oil cake but is included in the estimate of normal consumption. (i) Net imports taken as equivalent to normal consumption. 165 22 ANNEX K SWEDISH IMPORTS FROM ENEMY TERRITORY No complete statistics are available on Swedish imports from Germany and Occupied Europe. It is known, however, that deliveries in 1941 and estimated deliveries for the full year 1942 are as follows: 1941 Coal and Coke Commercial iron Pig iron Artificial textiles Machinery 4,800,000 tons 230,000 tons 80,000 tons 144,000,000 kronen 110,000,000 kronen Potash Salt Chloride of lime Soda N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 1942 3,800,000 tons 300,000 tons 72,000 tons 6,000 tons 110,000,000 kronen 100,000 tons 340,000 tons 30,000 tons 30,000 tons N.R. - Not reported Other German exports to Sweden include glass, paints, dyes and ammonium sulphate. German shipments of coal, coke and iron have been consistently far behind the agreed schedules. Thus while Germany agreed to send 5,700,000 tons of coal and coke to Sweden annually during 1941 and 1942, actual and expected deliveries were respectively 900,000 tona (15%) and 1,900,000 tons (33%) below those stipulated for these years. In the case of commercial iron and pig iron, German deliveries in 1941 were 130,000 tons (30%) below those promised. While deliveries of commercial iron to Sweden in 1942 appear to be improving, Germany has failed to keep her promise to make up the backlog loft over from 1941. Sweden also has trado agreements with Denmark, Norway, Finland, Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Holland, Slovakia, Hungary and Roumania. During the first six months of 1942, Denmark was to deliver sugar (20,000 tons), eggs (600 tons), condonsod milk, fish, seeds, casoin, insulin, choose and certain industrial products. This agreement has boon renewed for the second half of 1942, and Denmark is to provido, in addition to the above commodities, preserves, honey, ooffee substitutes and ovalmaltine. During the coming six months, also, Bulgarin is to deliver tobacco and fodder to Sweden. Under the Swedish-Finnish agreement covering the period from May 1 to the ond of 1942, the Finns only undertake to export to Swoden to the extent mado possiblo by thoir supply position, whorcas the Swodcs guarantoo dolivorios of iron and stool and machinery. 23 It is not known exactly what commoditios Italy has undertakon to send to Swodon during the first half of 1942, but toxtiles appear to bc among them. Franco will supply Swodon until the end of 1942 with wines, cork, chomicals, and various luxury articles. Bolgium is to export to Swodon rayon, chloride of lime, leathor goods, zine platos, clectrodes, chonicals and glass. Slovakia supplies 1,500 tons of lubricating oil as woll as driod vogetables, honey, alcohol and poultry. Roumania is to furnish gasolino and other potroleum products and whoat to Swoden during 1942 in exchange for exports from Swedon of special steel, chromium, and tractors. Norway exports fish, nitratos of limo, sulphur and pyritos, molybdenum, zinc and aluminum to Swoden in exchange for Swedish exports. On September 9, 1942, a new agreement was initialed botween Swoden and Hungary whereby the latter was to supply foodstuffs, chemicals, potroleum products, bauxite, aluminum oxide, hemp products and electrical supplies. 166 24 ANNEX L SKEDISH CREDIT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE AXIS There have been three kinds of Swedish credit contributions to the Axis: A clearing credit to Germany in 1941; Export credit guarantees granted by Sweden for exports to Germany and Finland; and loans to Finland to cover her purchases of food in Denmark. 1. The Clearing Credit. In 1941, Germany purchased one billion kronen worth of goods from Sweden and exported to Sweden goods valued at nine hundred million kronen. Sweden granted Germany a clearing credit to make up the difference of one hundred million kronen. It is understood that this credit has already been liquidated through the shipments by Germany of war material and gold to the Swedes. During June 1942 a German trade delegation arrived in Sweden to arrange a new clearing credit of 250,000,000 kronor for the remainder of the year, in order to remedy the situation c reated by declining German coal deliveries. After considerable discussion Germany was not only refused the additional credit but was forced to agree to pay 20,000,000 kronor in gold outside the clearing. This refusal of a clearing credit, however, explains the greater pressure upon Sweden to expand the ex- port credit guarantees as described below. 2. Export Credit Guarantees. The Swedish Government guarantees to its exporters who deal with Germany in certain commodities (wood and manufacturers, paper and cardboard, machinery, tools and ball bearings) payment of 25 per cent or 35 per cent, depending upon the commodity, of the invoice price. The maximum extent to which such export crodits can be given is determined by the Swedish parliament which has set a ceiling on the sum that may be guarantood by the Government financing agency. At the present time, the ceiling has been set at one hundred million kronen for the 1942- 1944 fiscal years. But since it is expected that the prosent limit of one hundred million kronon will be exceeded by the end of this month, the Swedish Parliament is being pressed to increase the maximum credit to three hundred million kronon for the 1942-44 period. Swoden also permits Finland to defer payment for goods exported to Finland undor the trade agreement between the two countries. The maximum credit to be granted for the period from May 1 to December 31, 1942, is 22,750,000 kronen. 3. Loans to Finland to Cover Food Purchased in Donmark. Sweden has on throo occasions this year extended crodits to Finland for the purchase of foodstuffs in Donmark. Those credits 25 total thirty-seven million Swodish kronon and arc not based on any financial transfor but upon actual shipments from Swoden to Donmark to pay for Danish delivorios to Finland/ Swedish exports to Denmark during the first half of 1942 were estimated to be not less than sixty-six million kronen of which at least twenty-eight million kronen covered Danish deliveries to Finland. The Ministry of Economic Warfare concludes that "these Swedish loans to Finland are particularly reprehensible because they not only assist the Finns in getting supplies of foodstuffs but also aid the Danes in receiving supplies from Sweden". The Ministry of Economic Warfare also states that it is a violation of international law for a neutral government to assist a belligerent in receiving credit from the neutral's own citizens. It is estimated that during 1942 Swedish credits to Germany and Finland will total about 300 million kronor, equivalent in value to one-forth of Sweden's exports of goods and services to the enemy. But, in addition, there are other credits granted indirectly through the artificial inflation of German export prices. These concealed credits may amount to about 200 million kronor in 1942. If this amount is added to the direct credit, about 40 percent of Swedish exports of goods and services to the enemy may be estimated to be uncompensated by the enemy's exports to Sweden. 167 26 ANNEX M SWEDISH OIL POSITION 1, Military Based on statistical data furnished by the Swedish Government on September 10, 1942, it is estimated that on November 1,Siredish petroleum stocks for military purposes will be as follows: 24,600 tons Aviation gasoline Gas bil and fuel oil 73,500 tons Lubricants 5,500 tons According to the latest Swedish statement, the present monthly rate of consumption is as follows: Aviation gasoline Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 1,800 tons 3,750 tons 180 tons Based on these consumption rates, the stock position in terms of months supply is as follows: Aviation gasoline Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 13 months 192 months 30 months In the early part of this year, the Swedes estimated that under combat conditions, monthly petroleum requirements would be as follows: Aviation gasoline Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 7,000 tons 21,000 tons 1,000 tons Based on this consumption rate under combat conditions, the stock position in terms of months' supply would be as follows: Aviation gasoline 30 months 30 months Lubricants 5 months G6s oil and fuel oil On September 10 the Swedish Government Representative in London War- reported to the Representatives of the Ministry of Economic the fare and the Petroleum Attache to the American Embassy that Swedish Rikstag had, in June of this year, approved a five-year plan for defense. Based on this plan, monthly requirements under 27 combat conditions are estimated by the Swedes to be as follows: Aviation gasoline 11,000 tons Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 40,000 tons 2,000 tons on the basis of these latest estimates, the Swedish stock position, in terms of Months! supply, would be as follows on November11: Aviation gasoline 2223 months Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 1188 months 2.75 months The proposed Sveadrott cargo is as follows: Aviation gasoline Fuel oil and gas oil (Fuel oil 7,400) (Goa oil 1,600) Lubricants 4,800 tons 9,000 tons 570 tons According to the latest estimates of consumption under combat conditions, as follows: this cargo would cover requirements approximately Aviation gasoline Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants 2 weeks 1 week 1 week 2. Non-Military a. Domostic Requirements The petroleum products which Sweden imported through the blockade during 1941 and 1942 were exclusively for military uso. Non-military requirements have beon and are being met from the pre-wer stock pile, indigenous production of shale oil, alcohol and other.substitutes, and the importation of small quantities of low-grade lubricatns from Germany. Basod on statistics secured from the Swedes, the November 1 stock position of petroleum productánfor non-military use should be approximately as follows: Automotive gasoline Keroseno Gas oil and fuel oil Lubricants to 103,000 tons 14,000 tons 15,000 tons 21,500 tons 168 28 Based on the latest available figures for civil consumption, the stock position in terms of months' supply should be as follows: Automotive gasoline Kerosone 60 months of months Gas oil and fuel oil 9 months Lubricants 10 months This estimate is basod on consumption at the presont rnto. It is estimated that under combat conditions, automotivo gasolino, the only product which would bo consumod in largor quantity, would last for 30 months. b. Bunker Requirements Swedish ships in the Gothonburg safe conduct traffic receive their bunker oil supplios from Buonos Airos and Montovidoo. These stocks are laid down by Swedish tankers and are subject to the control of this Government by means of a system which has recently been developed by the Board of Economic Warfare, Petroleum Coordinator, State Department and War Shipping Administration. The loading of the tankers carrying these bunker supplies to Buenos Aires and Montevideo is also under the strict control of this Government. The quantity of bunker fuel lifted by the Gothenburg ships from the two above-mentioned bunker stations totals about 6,000 tons monthly.