View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

DIARY

Book 395

May 5 - 7, 1941

-

-- - -

-ABook

Agriculture

Page

Appropriations for aid reviewed in light of
defense effort - Haas memorandum - 5/5/41

395

39

Myers (William I.) reviews HMJr's testimony before
House Ways and Means Committee - 5/6/41

128

Cotton: Surplus disposal program continuance HMJr's apprehension concerning inflationary
tendencies discussed by Haas and Hamilton

(Assistant to Secretary of Agriculture) - 5/7/41.

368

(See also Book 396, page 78)

a) Discussed at 9:30 meeting - 5/9/41:
Book 396, page 104

American Association of Middlesboro, Kentucky
See War Conditions: Purchasing Mission
American Viscose Corporation
See War Conditions: Purchasing Mission
Argentina

See Latin America

-B-

Bell, Daniel W.
See Financing, Government

Business Conditions
Haas memorandum on situation for week ending
May 3, 1941

95

-cCanada

See War Conditions

Cochran, H. Merle
Resume' of duties in memorandum prepared for

Wiley - 5/5/41

55

-DDefense, National
Department of Supply - Cox memorandum concerning 5/5/41

81

a) Draft No. 1 of Bill - 5/8/41:
See Book 396, page 84

b) Discussion by HMJr, Thompson, Bell, Foley,
McReynolds, Spingarn, Cochran, and Kuhn 5/9/41: Book 396, page 152

1) Letter, memorandum, and draft of bill
for FDR: Book 396, pages 174, 176, 190, and 192

Nasi employment in airplane factories discussed in Wiley
memorandum - 5/6/41

198

Financing - Bell's speech before National Association
of Mutual Savings Banks' convention in Philadelphia 5/7/41
Defense Savings Bonds

356

See Financing, Government
Dunne, Irene

Husband (Dr. Francis Griffin) consults Treasury about
some California property he wishes to acquire - 5/5/41..

3

-IBook

Page

Financing, Government

Principal holders as of March 31, 1941, of 31%
Treasury bonds maturing on August 1, 1941 -

5/5/41

395

Financing - Bell's speech before National
Association of Mutual Savings Banks' convention
in Philadelphia - 5/7/41

73

356

Defense Savings Bonds:

Labor representation on committees discussed at
9:30 meeting - 5/3/41
Sales, May 1-6, 1941

13

167

Fort Knox

MacLeish asks for space to store valuable documents;
Treasury feels space is needed for gold 5/5/41

20,37,38

-GGermany

See War Conditions

Griffin, Dr. Francis (Husband of Irene Dunne)
Consults Treasury about some California property
he wishes to acquire - 5/5/41
-HHalifax, Viscount
See War Conditions: United Kingdom

-IIndo-China

See War Conditions: Foreign Funds Control

-JJapan

See War Conditions: Foreign Funds Control

-KKentucky - American Association of Middlesboro
See War Conditions: Purchasing Mission

3

-LBook

Latin America

Page

Argentina:

Credit by Export-Import Bank and stabilization
loan: Message sent to Argentina Congress

transmitting draft law - 5/5/41

395

61

Pierson (Export-Import Bank) visit reported on
by American Embassy, Buenos Aires - 5/6/41

180

Mexico:

Labor situation discussed in Hochschild report 5/5/41

70

Lindbergh, Charles A.
Cox memorandum on expertness in his own field 5/6/41

205

-NMacLeish, Archibald (Librarian of Congress)
See Mint, Bureau of: Fort Knox
Mexico

See Latin America
Middle East
See War Conditions

Mint, Bureau of
Fort Knox: MacLeish asks for space to store
valuable documents; Treasury feels space is
needed for gold - 5/5/41

20,37,38

-

Pierson, Warren (Export-Import Bank)
See Latin America: Argentina
Price Control
See War Conditions

Procurement Division
See War Conditions: Lend-Lease

-RReconstruction Finance Corporation

Bill to amend: Important questions of policy
discussed in Foley memorandum - 5/7/41

378

Revenue Revision

Life insurance industry as a source of increased
revenue discussed in Foley memorandum - 5/5/41

Myers (William I.) reviews HMJr's testimony before

25

House Ways and Means Committee - 5/6/41

128

5/6/41

141

Excess Profits Tax: Discussion at 9:30 meeting Excise Tax Proposals: Henderson to testify against

before House Ways and Means Committee - O'Connell

memorandum - 5/6/41

Conference; present: HMJr, Gaston, White, Sullivan,
Helvering, Haas, Tarleau, Blough, O'Donnell, Foley,
and Kades - 5/7/41

a) Estimates for Excess Profits (specific companies)

168

228,267

Book Page

Supply, Department of
See Defense, National

Taxation
See Revenue Revision
U-

Unemployment Relief

Work Projects Administration report for week
ending April 23, 1941

395

110

United Kingdom
See War Conditions

-VWar Conditions

Airplanes:
Bomber (4-engine) most desperately needed by

both British and United States - Arnold tells

HMJr - 5/7/41

263

British pilots and navigators - training program

in United States discussed by HMJr, Cox, and
Arnold - 5/7/41
Lockheed P-38 type pursuit interceptor airplanes actual and estimated deliveries to United
States Army

260,331

369

Nazi employment in airplane factories discussed

in Wiley memorandum - 5/6/41
Shipments to United Kingdom and overseas commands British Air Commission memorandum - 5/6/41

198

172

Canada:

Highlights of budget proposals, 1941-1942 - White
memorandum - 5/5/41

Exchange market resume' - 5/5/41, etc
Foreign Funds Control:
Axis cash withdrawals - Wiley memorandum 5/6/41

76

93,208,381

203

Indo-China:

Export of certain military equipment imported
from France to United States during 1939 and
1940: State Department requests and Pehle
recommends approval - 5/5/41

35

Japan:

Anticipatory steps in view of possible blocking
of funds in United States - Federal Reserve
Bank of New York resume' - 5/5/41

67

Germany:

Rueckwanderer marks - Wiley memorandum - 5/6/41.
Food package situation - Viley memorandum 5/6/41

201

202

- W - (Continued)
Book

War Conditions (Continued)

Page

Lend-Lease:

See also War Conditions: Purchasing Mission

Procurement officials authorised to sign

requisitions for defense articles - 5/5/41

395

87

Middle East:
Cox gives HMJr memorandum prepared by staff
member of Federal Reserve Bank of New York 5/6/41

191

Military Planning:

War Department bulletins:
German Motorized Infantry Division for
1941 - 5/5/41
German Reconnaissance Units - further notes
on - 5/7/41
Report from London transmitted by Halifax 5/7/41

114
386

383

Price Control:
Weekly meeting report - O'Connell memorandum 5/6/41

168

a) Excise tax proposals: Henderson to
testify against before House Ways and
Means Committee

b) Ocean transportation discussed
c) Rubber consumption

d) Capital funds

Purchasing Mission:
See also War Conditions: Lend-Lease
American Viscose Corporation: Foley memorandum
on conferences to discuss closing agreement

for recapitalization - 5/5/41

51,226

(See Cochran memorandum on conversation

with Peacock - 5/19/41: Book 399, page 406)
Stanley (Harold)-HMJr conversation - 5/20/41:
Book 400, page 73

a) Foley memorandum on a talk with Stanley 5/20/41: Book 400, page 79
Cochran-Phillips conversation: Book 400, page 86
Foley-HMJr conversation about Cochran memorandum:
Book 400, page 220

a) Foley memorandum on conversation:
Book 400, page 240

Jones-HMJr conversation: Book 400, page 231
Jones-Max Gardner-HMJr correspondence: Book 400,
page 235

Information to United States: HMJr wishes to warn
Beaverbrook of dangerous situation if United
States gets feeling "quid pro quo" precedure is
being set up; wishes Beaverbrook reminded of
satisfactory arrangements covering Rolls Royce
engine - 5/6/41
American Association of Middlesboro, Kentucky:

148

See memorandum to Sir Edward Peacock concerning 5/7/41

380

- I - (Continued)
Book

Page

395

332

Var Conditions (Continued)
United Kingdom:

Halifax thanks HMJr for assistance rendered
United Kingdom - 5/7/41

Work Projects Administration
See Unemployment Relief

1

May 5, 1941
9:30 a.m.
GROUP MEETING

Present:

Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Kuhn

Mr. Foley

Mr. Haas
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Thompson
Mr. Schwarz
Mr. Graves

Mrs. Klotz
Mr. Gaston
Mr. White

H.M.Jr:

This fellow Sidney Hillman is quite a boy.

Here is a letter to the President signed (dated
by Hillman and Knudsen.

"The Council of the Office of Production
Management has given careful consideration
to the joint recommendations recently made
to you by Secretary Morgenthau and Mr. Nelson.

"At the meeting on April 29 of the Council
of the Office of Production Management, it
was agreed that the labor policy, as outlined

by the Advisory Commission to the Council of
National Defense in September 1940 and trans-

mitted to you by the Congress, is in full
force and effect and will continue to be
followed in the letting of defense contracts.

"The Council is unanimously opposed to the
adoption of the recommendations jointly made

2

-2to you by Secretary Morgenthau and Mr. Nelson,

as unnecessary. It was stated that the

officers of OPM charged with the clearance

of contracts will, in doubtful cases, consult
the Labor Division of OPM and will refrain
from clearing contracts to habitual violators
of the Federal labor laws, except in instances
where, in their opinion, such action would result
in undue interference with the preparation of
national defense.

"The papers forwarded by you are herewith

returned.

Yours respectfully,
(signed) William S. Knudsen
Director General

(signed) Sidney Hillman

Associate Director General"

Well, if Sidney Hillman doesn't want it, it
is his responsibility and why should I worry?
White:

Was that sent to you from the Council or from

H.M.Jr:

From the President.

White:

Does that mean that he read the letter?

H.M.Jr:

Sure.

White:

It isn't the first mistake they have made.

H.M.Jr:

Lubin practically wrote it for us, didn't he?

Foley:

What?

H.M.Jr:

This is what Lubin said Hillman had been fighting

the President?

for for six months. This is what Lubin wanted.

3

-3Foley:

That is what Lubin wanted, sure.

White:

Hillman shadow boxes. He doesn't fight.

H.M.Jr:

That is all right. Round one.
Now, the other thing, Ferdinand Kuhn.

Kuhn:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, sir.

I got a memo from you that Dr. Francis Griffin,

husband of Irene Dunne, wants to see me. You

say he wants this property in California. Do
you know what that property is? Is that the
golf links?

Kuhn:

I don't know. Mr. Harmon of the Hays Office
simply told me it was Treasury-owned property
on which it was proposed to build & health
center and it was property you had seen per-

sonally on one of your trips West. It may be
a golf course. He didn't say.

H.M.Jr:

There is a golf course which I wanted six
hundred thousand dollars for, as I remember it.

Sullivan:

Just about.

Foley:

I thought that was in California.

H.M.Jr:

It is. Why can't Dr. Griffin inasmuch as he
is Dr. Griffin, not Irene Dunne, see Mr.
Sullivan, in charge of the matter.

Sullivan:

Tell him to bring Irene with him. (Laughter)

Kuhn:

Mr. Secretary, this request came from Hays
himself, and since Hays had helped us very

greatly on the movies, I thought I would put
it up to you.

H.M.Jr:

It is not worth it. I mean, let him see - I

don't want to - the next thing, Herbert, I am

4

-4afraid, will be something more embarrassing;

and if they don't want to help the country,
we will get along without them.
Kuhn:

They were all right, they just made the request.

H.M.Jr:

Well, the next request will be some tax case,

so I think, if you don't mind - I thought of it

over the week-end - I would refer Dr. Griffin because it is a long, complicated -S. W. Straus is in it, and they have got the
mortgage. I haven't been on this thing in a
couple of years. Do you remember the case?

Sullivan:

All I recall is that there is a golf links

H.M.Jr:

It is a long and complicated case. I would only
have to refer them to Sullivan anyway. He is a
very important fellow, Sullivan is.

out there that we own and operate.

Mr. Gaston?
Gaston:

We have been fooling around with the Yugoslav
ships over Sunday. A message came to the
Yugoslav ships from - purporting to come from

H.M.Jr:

Yugoslavia - it was in Italian, transmitted
to Rome, ordering all the ships in the Atlantic
to flee, was the word used, the translation of
the Italian word used, to Brazil and Argentina
and those in the Pacific to Japan.
What is the Italian word for flee?

Gaston:

I don't know.

H.M.Jr:

Mussolini. (Laughter)

Gaston:

Or some other kind of an insect.

H.M.Jr:

That is what a week-end in the country does
among the apple blossoms.

5

5Gaston:

Do you know the one about the two bugs that
met on the windshield?

H.M.Jr:

No.

Gaston:

One said to the other, "I bet you haven't got
the guts to do that again.' (Laughter)

Foley:

I don't know where he got that one.

Gaston:

That was the Customs party.

H.M.Jr:

It is all right.

Gaston:

I talked to Summer Welles and the Yugoslavian

Minister. We put a dock guard on all of them.
We didn't put any men aboard except for

inspection trips.

One of them in Boston, we put the guards aboard

but we are holding them all for further inquiry
and sent word to Panama about a couple of them
down there that the Yugoslavian Minister was

quite suspicious of.
H.M.Jr:

O.K.

Gaston:

It caused a little excitement in the newspapers.

H.M.Jr:

Anything else?

Gaston:

No.

H.M.Jr:
Gaston:

Is that all?
That is all I think of.

H.M.Jr:

Nothing from Secretary Knox on the seven cutters?

Gaston:

No.

H.M.Jr:

The next move is up to him?

Gaston:

That is what I told Waesche. I haven't heard
anything.

H.M.Jr:

Foley?

6

6Foley:

H.M.Jr:

Is that what you wanted? (Handing Secretary a

memorandum to the President)

A little later on, Herbert, I will give you

a little notice. I wanted to see you and John
Wiley and Sammy Klaus about this work that

they are doing for the FBI on money, and the

Tribune is all excited about it, you know.
Gaston:

The Tribune?

H.M.Jr:

New York Tribune. They had a swell story
Saturday.

Gaston:

Oh, I saw that story on the Italian funds.

H.M.Jr:

It will be some time between ten and eleven.

Gaston:

They have learned a little of the facts.

H.M.Jr:
Cochran:

Are you in on that, Merle?
I have been in on some of it.

H.M.Jr:

Is that - does that end of the work --

Cochran:

I see Stopford and most of these reports.

H.M.Jr:
Cochran:

I will have you in, too.
All right.

H.M.Jr:

Why should I --

Foley:

Well, you said Saturday that you wanted a
memorandum in 80 far as these military powers
were concerned, about the greenback and the

silver legislation, why were they not involved

here.
H.M.Jr:

No. That doesn't call for a letter to the

Foley:

No, I think probably just a memorandum.

H.M.Jr:

No.

President.

7

-7Foley:

Here is the proposed memorandum that Dean

Acheson brought over. (Undated, delivered by

Mr. Acheson, May 3)
H.M.Jr:

Sit down. Well, I will believe it when they
sign it.
The New York Tribune has got a nice article on

Schwarz:

it today. A long overdue step is taken.
There is a very nice cartoon there, too, Mr.
Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

And a nice cartoon. I will believe it when

Foley:

All right. Here is a memorandum on the Viscose
Company's agreement that we entered into. I

it happens.

think you will probably want to read that.

(Handing memorandum to Secretary, dated May 5)
H.M.Jr:

You hang onto it. I won't get time to read it.

Cochran:

Three thirty?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. And you, Harry.

Foley:

Wouldn't you want to take this home and read
it then?

H.M.Jr:

No, should I?

Foley:

You ought to be primed on it if he is coming
in at three thirty tomorrow.

H.M.Jr:

Have you got to prime me with four pages?

Foley:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

All right, what else.
That is all.

Foley:

I just gave Stanley an appointment at three
thirty for tomorrow on Viscose, so you had
better be here, and you (Cochran) be here.

8

-8H.M.Jr:

Sullivan?

Sullivan:

Mr. Doughton arrived this morning. I talked
with Jerry last night and arranged to have
him get hold of Doughton first before Stam
and those other fellows did, and Doughton

reported to Jerry he thought the letter from
the President was fine but he thought he

had better answer it. He was going to talk

it over with Jerry. This was off the record
between Jerry and myself. He didn't want it

known that I knew that, and he wondered

whether or not I thought that Doughton should
answer the letter. Of course, what Doughton
wants to do is to stress the economy end of

it, and I told Jerry I would let him know
later, but I thought for the time being it

might be well if anything was going to happen

in case I had a chance to talk with Jerry,

Doughton had better ask the President if he
did want a reply.
H.M.Jr:

Well, we had better wait and find out from

the Speaker what luck he had with the President this morning.

Sullivan:

I see.

H.M.Jr:

I will call Sam Rayburn and tell him that
Doughton is thinking of answering the letter.

Sullivan:

Well, I don't know. The conversation between
Doughton and Cooper was confidential. Can't
you find out from Sam without telling him
Bob Doughton is thinking of writing a letter?

H.M.Jr:

Well, what harm would it be?

Sullivan:

Because Jerry wasn't supposed to tell anybody
that Doughton was thinking of this.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Go ahead.

9

90
Sullivan:

That is all, except the American Legion
last week voted to recommend to all its
Posts and members that they put whatever
surplus funds they have in defense bonds.
I don't know whether you (Graves) saw that

or not. I have the material on my desk.

It just came in, and I will send it in to
you.

H.M.Jr:

When do you testify?

Sullivan:

Probably Wednesday.

H.M.Jr:

Before you do, I want you to go over it

with me.

Sullivan:

Yes, sir, I want to go over it too.

H.M.Jr:

I want to go over it with you.

Sullivan:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

And what did you do about this man who represents the rubber industry who came in to
lobby and is working for OPM?

Sullivan:

I didn't do anything about it.

H.M.Jr:

I think you should. I would like to write

a letter to the four men of the OPM and say,
"Here this man is on your payroll, and he
comes in here and lobbies for the rubber

industry. What are you going to do about it?"
Sullivan:

Then he comes back and says, "We thought you

would like to have the benefit of a man who
has worked - the opinion of a fellow who has

done this work all his life.

H.M.Jr:

My answer is he should either work with the
Government or this rubber institute.

10

- 10 Sullivan:

He came in as Assistant Chief Counsel of
the Bureau and now represents Firestone
Rubber Company, and he is a pretty decent
fellow.

H.M.Jr:

That is what I think you ought to do. You
can do what you want to. I don't think you

can have these fellows around town working
under the guise of being working for OPM
and at the same time representing a group

of an industry. I think it is outrageous.

Sullivan:

I thought I would like to see whether he

H.M.Jr:

I wouldn't wait. I would write a letter and
I will sign it, to Stimson, Knox, Knudsen,

testifies.

and these other fellows and tell them, "Who
is this man working for, the rubber industry
or for the United States Government?" I would

like to know. If you don't drive these fel-

lows out of town, they are just going to take
the town. I am not going to force it because
he came in to see you, but if you want to

write it, I will sign it.

Sullivan:

Well, let me talk it over with some of the

H.M.Jr:

If you don't drive these fellows out of
town and let me write these letters, it is

fellows.

going to get worse and worse. Nobody else

has got the nerve. I have. This man cannot
work for the Government and the rubber
institute and be here at the same time. He
came to see you at your office. He didn't

talk from his office.

Sullivan:

No, that was in the office.

H.M.Jr:

And with the counsel of Firestone Rubber?

11

- 11 Sullivan:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

I would like to write it, but he is your guest.
It is up to you. O.K.

Cochran:

Sir Frederick Phillips followed up the suggestion you gave him on Thursday and has

written in a pretty good letter giving contracts which might be handled, and do you
want to wait on that now?

H.M.Jr:

I think we will wait.

Cochran:

And then follow up if necessary?

H.M.Jr:

Walter Stewart will be here. Let him read
up on what we have done on that.

Cochran:

He is coming in today?

H.M.Jr:

Tomorrow. O.K.?

Cochran:

Yes, sir.

Kuhn:

I have nothing.

H.M.Jr:

George?

Haas:

I have got several things. They are bulky
but they won't take long. I have got a
medium chart now with the tanks on it.

H.M.Jr:

I will tell you what you do. I want immediately after this to get White started on
something for the President, so if you will
wait a couple of minutes outside, leave your
stuff here, but what I want to say to Harry
will only take sixty seconds. Then I will
see you.

Harry?

12

- 12 -

White:

I have nothing. The criticism of the tax

bill includes the recommendation for a sales

levy on the grounds of inflation. I don't

know whether John already has prepared
answers to that, but an adequate answer can

be prepared, and I think should be prepared

either to present to Congress or - either in
a letter or to have ready for some publicity,

because it gains - it is gaining a lot of

adherence, and I think it can be adequately

answered.

Sullivan:

We have some material, but I would like very

much for you to take a crack at it yourself,
Harry.

White:

Who is working on it for you?

Sullivan:

Blough.

By the way, did you (Secretary) see the New

Republic, the letter on the tax program?

H.M.Jr:

No.

Sullivan:

Mr. Kuhn just gave me that. I thought it

H.M.Jr:

Right. Anything else, Harry?

White:

No, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Chick?

White:

I have that material whenever you want it.

H.M.Jr:

Have you got it with you?

White:

It is in the office.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am going to give you something which

was a very good article.

13

- 13 -

will change it.
Schwarz:

There are a few things here I think you

might like to see, including this letter
on the sales tax. I put in a call for
John two days ago on that subject. I

think we can develop something, but he

has been busy.
H.M.Jr:

Good.

Harold, I have got a criticism for you.

I looked over those various committees,
see.

Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I did it very fast so I may be wrong,
but with the exception of the State of
Connecticut, there isn't a single labor
representative on any of them.

Graves:

I think you must be wrong.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am not counting state officials.

Graves:

Well, we--

H.M.Jr:

I am not counting the head of a labor depart-

ment.
Graves:

Well, that was our - we did that deliberately,

Mr. Morgenthau, We suggested that where the

head of the state labor department, State
Commissioner of Labor, was suitable from the
standpoint of being acceptable to the various

14

- 14 -

organizations, we, as a matter of choice,
wanted that man put on to - as the representative of labor. The same way with

Agriculture. You will find that those
committees contain the State Commissioner
of Agriculture as the representative of
the farm groups. That was done deliberately.

H.M.Jr:

Well, if these representatives of education, agriculture, and labor in South
Carolina are anything like other state
commissioners, I know they don't rate very
high.

Graves:

Well, we have left that to our state of-

ficers. We cautioned them not to suggest

the appointment of the State Commissioner

of Labor or Agriculture unless the man is
thoroughly qualified according to our
standards to represent those groups on the
committee, and there are instances where

they are not clearly qualified and have

not been recommended, but we did that on
purpose.
Kuhn:

Wasn't that also Lubin's idea, Harold, that
we should do this as the most practical

way.

Graves:

Well, I personally have not heard that

mentioned by Mr. Lubin. I remember you
were there one time when I was not there,

but if there is any mistake, it is my

mistake because-H.M.Jr:

It isn't a mistake, I simply say that I

15

- 15 -

think if you will look it over the only one in

Connecticut where you have the labor man is the
Teamster's Joint Council of Connecticut, and
every other place you have got nothing but state

officials.

Graves:

Yes, that is right. We have tried to leave the
selection of these committees to the state men

who have come here, because in each state there

are, of course, cross currents of various kinds
and political factions, group factions and so on
that we here can't judge about.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you are going to get just one kind, I am
warning you. Let's take Texas, for instance.
Well, the Governor of Texas is a good flour
salesman. I don't know what his social viewpoints are and so forth and so on, but if you
take his entire administration to run our thing,
you may not be so well off. Now, take Michigan,
for instance, or rather Wisconsin would be

better. If you take all the state officials of

Wisconsin, you are certainly going to get the
most anti-labor people.
Graves:

Well, we would do well to watch each state in
that respect, and we intend to as best we can,

and that is perhaps one reason why we have wanted

to go slowly about these state organizations and
see how we fare.

H.M.Jr:

Well now, just for fun, let's take these five or
six state labor commissions, see. You brought
Green and Phil Murray in here, and you brought
the fellow from the railway brotherhood. Ask
those three what they think of those six labor

commissioners, just as a test. That is fair, isn't
it?

Graves:

I don't think so.

16

- 16 H.M.Jr:

But supposing all three say that they are no
good?

Graves:

I think that our men in these states are better
judges of that than the heads of these organi-

zations who are just as far away from them as we

ourselves are. If our men can't be relied upon
to advise us in such matters, then there is
something wrong with our men. We will have to

think about that.
H.M.Jr:

I don't see eye to eye with you, Harold. I am
sorry.

Graves:

Of course, if --

H.M.Jr:

I don't see eye to eye with you.

Graves:

If you don't take these state commissioners of

Labor, you are practically forced in any industrial state to put on a representative of the
CIO or a representative of the AF of L or a
representative of the brotherhoods.

H.M.Jr:

What did you think we were going to do?

Graves:

I beg pardon?

H.M.Jr:

I don't see that this is any different than taking
the President of the State of New York Manufacturer's Association or the New York State Chamber
of Commerce.

Graves:

On my theory, we would take the President of the
New York State Manufacturer's Association, assum-

ing that he was representative of that group, as

a member of our committee; and in some states we

have taken such officers to represent that group.
H.M.Jr:

Will you do this for me? Have a talk with the

people who are advising you, like Kuhn and Gaston

17

- 17 and Odegarde and just bring up this question

that I am raising for criticism.

Graves:

In the instructions, Mr. Morgenthau --

H.M.Jr:

Will you do that for me?
We will do that.

Graves:

H.M.Jr:

Take it up with Gaston and Kuhn and Odegarde and
Houghteling.

Graves:

Very good. Mr. Kuhn and Mr. Odegarde are, of

course, very aware of this, and I think there has
been carried in the instructions which we gave
to our state officers that where we do have an

acceptable Commissioner of Agriculture and an
acceptable Commissioner of Labor, that we should

use those officers in the committee. There is

another reason than any that has been discussed
here. These people have a piece of machinery.
They have an agency that -H.M.Jr:

But you may be paying too much money for the

machinery.
Graves:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Look, Harold. I am raising a question. I have
got grave doubts. You have got three or four
fellows around you that you and I have got con-

fidence in. I want you to talk to them.
Graves:

Very well.

H.M.Jr:

I want you to check it; it worries me. The

quality of the women you have got on there doesn't
impress me. The whole purpose is to start - I

am worried about it, and I think -- well, you

might find one of these groups might run away with
it and put on the most outrageous kind of a campaign.

18

- 18 Graves:

Well, we are in a position to bear against that,
if that were the only thing to worry about. I,
for one, would not be worried about it.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am; so if you will, as you always do, sit

down and have a talk with these half dozen people

that I have suggested, or anybody else that is
around, and come back with that particular group,

and let's have a little round-table discussion.
Will you do that?
Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I am ready as soon as you have talked with these

people, you see.
Graves:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, sir.

..that I mentioned. Will you do that?

Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

And just these two, put it up to them just the
way I say. I have got nothing else. And then

between you and Chick, for Heaven's sake, for my
three o'clock press conference have something for
me on the bonds. For instance, Graves tells me

that the original order for the booklets was
thirty million, and you have had to order how

many more?
Graves:

We have ordered twenty million more. That is,
we have a request from the Post Office Department

to order twenty million.

H.M.Jr:

Give me something like that, and then you also
mentioned the twenty-five and fifty dollar bonds
are running out. I would like something more on
that. And also, from the Federal Reserve Banks,
if you would give me something on the F and G
bonds.

19

- 19 Graves:

I was going to speak of that. We have only

fragmentary reports from banks on what business
they have done.

H.M.Jr:

I think, if you call up the Fed of New York --

Graves:

We have their reports, but you see, here is one

thing they can't do for us. The banks in the

New York Federal Reserve district are receiving
orders for the F and G bonds, and there is a lag
between the time when the order is filed with
the customer at the bank and the time when it is
filed at the Federal Reserve Bank, and the thing
that any statistics we might get today would

H.M.Jr:

probably lack is that lag, the transit articles.
Well, I will tell you what you do. You and Chick

Graves:

Yes. I would like to tell you that Mr. Haas and

come in to see me at five minutes of three and
give me what you have, will you?

I have had a discussion about this whole matter

of the statistics on this set-up, and he is
going to help me to reorganize that thing.

H.M.Jr:

Good.

Graves:

So we can do better in the statistics than we
are now able to do. That is one aspect of the
thing I have not done very well.

H.M.Jr:

He is a good man.

Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

All right. At five minutes of three for you and
Chick.

Graves:

Yes, sir.

Thompson:

Phil Young has prescribed a requisition form for
these purposes, and there is an order here for

20

- 20 -

you to sign designating Mac or his assistant
to sign.

H.M.Jr:
Thompson:

Is this all right?
Yes, I think it is.

H.M.Jr:

Now, what about the money that I want to pay for
that group. Have you heard anything?

Thompson:

I haven't heard anything. I saw in the paper
this morning that they are expecting to have it

all put in the OEM.
H.M.Jr:

Could you call up McReynolds and say I would

like to know where it is, could he find out for
us?

Thompson:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

And let me know later on. Because Hopkins has

been fighting that. He didn't want it.

Thompson:

We have a request from Mr. MacLeish to use the

Fort Knox vaults as a depository for certain
sacred papers. We have facilities here now, but
I doubt if we would have in the event the occasion
should rise making it necessary to move these
papers from Washington.

H.M.Jr:
Thompson:

Would we have it for a limited number?

Mrs. Ross feels that the whole facility would be
exhausted by this situation. In other words,
you would be rushing gold there instead of documents.

H.M.Jr:

I mean for --

Thompson:

Well, MacLeish asked for three thousand cubic
feet.

21

- 21 H.M.Jr:

How much could we give them?

Thompson:

We could give them about ten cubic feet, which
would take care of some important papers.

H.M.Jr:

Why not change the letter and tell them we could
give them that much?

Gaston:

What is the matter with the

H.M.Jr:

This is in case of invasion. In case we leave
Washington. Tell them ten cubic feet, yes?

Thompson:

Mr. Helvering has sent in the recommendations for
promotion for the three men in you were interested
in, Oftedal and two others.

H.M.Jr:

Oh, good.

Thompson:

You don't have to sign them. I will give them to
you.

H.M.Jr:

Good. All right. Now, if I can have Harry White
for a minute and then George.

22

COPY
LYCOMING DIVISION

Aviation Manufacturing Corporation
Williamsport, Pa.

May 5, 1941

Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

The Secretary of the Treasury

Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. Secretary:

In accordance with your wish e xpressed at the time of

your visit in our plant we are glad to advise you that
the high output aircraft engine built under confidential
Navy contract passed the initial Navy test on April 25.
Official report on this test is now in the hands of the
Navy Department, Bureau of Aeronautics, Washington.

We very much appreciate your interest in the defense work
we are doing here in Williamsport.
Respectfully,
LYCOMING DIVISION

Aviation Manufacturing Corporation
/s/ W. K. Cooper
W. K. Cooper
General Manager
WKC:CMS

23

May 9. 1941

Dear Mr. Coopers

Thank you for your letter of

May 8th telling me that the - aircraft
engine has passed the initial Nevy test.

1 was pleased to have this infornation and appreciate year remembering
my request that you inform me when you

know the result of the test.
Sincerely,

(Signed) E. Borgesthen, 32.

Mr. v. K. Cooper,
General Hanager,

Lyeening Division,
Aviation Nannfesturing Corporation,
Williamoport, Pennsylvania.

GEF/jba

24

TO:

MISS CHAUNCEY

Mr. Foley carried the originals of
these memoranda to the Secretary at
9:30 meeting.
5/5/41.

MR. FOLEY

O

25

MAY 5 1941

Secretary Morganthan

E. N. Feloy, Jr.
One possible source of revenue not included in
our proposals to the Yaya and Means Committee is the

life insurance industry.
The industry is enermous, having capital assets

of close to $30 billion. Its income, derived from
investments and from premiums paid by policyholders,

exceeds $5 billion a year. The industry has been

growing in size at a rate well in excess of a billion
dellars a year.
a the other hand, in no year since 1921 has the
industry paid in federal income taxes as much as $500,000.
I know of no industry more dependent upon the

protection of government for its very existence, nor
one which apparently bears less of the burden of supporting

it.

JJO'C.Jr/Lew
5-2-41

(Initialed) E. H. F., Jr.

TO:

Miss Chauncey

5/5'41

3 p.m. 26

Mr. . Foley asked that this material

be sent to Mrs. Klotz.

Mr. Foley took it in to luncheon
today and the Secretary signed the
memo and initialed the order.
The original has been sent back to
Dean Acheson and Foley told him that since

HMJr. was not seeing the President today
he thought Secretary Hull (since he was
Sr. Cabinet member) should make arrangement

for presentation to the President.
MgGuira
MR. FOLEY

27

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT

We submit for your consideration a proposed Executive Order establishing an Economic Defense Committee,

consisting of the Secretaries of State and Trensury and
the Attorney General for the purpose of making recommend-

ations to you concerning the control of foreign funds,

foreign trade and related matters, in the interest of
the national defense. The Order would give the Committee

authority to supervise the administration of such freezing
or export control orders as you have issued or may issue.
The purpose of the Order is to coordinate and further
economic defense.

If this proposal meets with your approval, we con-

template designating officers of our respective Departments to work continuously together, keeping in constant

familiarity with our respective views and submitting to
us all recommendations proposed to be submitted to you.

These officers would have sitting with them advisors
from other departments and agencies of the Government

where the matters under consideration are of interest
to such other departments or agencies. We recommend also

that the Committee be provided with sufficient funds to
employ a small staff to work with the foreign funds control and the Administrator of Export Control in the preoperation of date for its consideration.

Carjeee
there
(Secretary of
State
(Secretary of the Treasury
you
(Attorney General)
May 5, 1941.

27

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT

We submit for your consideration a proposed Executive Order establishing an Economic Defense Committee,

consisting of the Secretaries of State and Treasury and
the Attorney General for the purpose of making recommend-

ations to you concerning the control of foreign funds,

foreign trade and related matters, in the interest of
the national defense. The Order would give the Committee

authority to supervise the administration of such freezing
or export control orders as you have issued or may issue.

The purpose of the Order is to coordinate and further
economic defense.

If this proposal meets with your approval, we contemplate designating officers of our respective Departments to work continuously together, keeping in constant

familiarity with our respective views and submitting to
us all recommendations proposed to be submitted to you.

These officers would have sitting with them advisors
from other departments and agencies of the Government

where the matters under consideration are of interest
to such other departments or agencies. We recommend also

that the Committee be provided with sufficient funds to
employ a small staff to work with the foreign funds control and the Administrator of Excort Control in the pre-

paration of date for its consideration.
(Secretary ofthree
State
Correce

Migunthant

(Secretary of the Treasury)
Phone

(Attorney General)

May 5, 1941.

28
EXECUTIVE ORDER

DEALING WITH THE ESTABLISHEENT OF AN ECONOMIC
DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND RELATED MATTERS

By virtue of and pursuant to the authority
vested in me by section 5(b) of the Act of October 6,
1917 (40 Stat. 415), as amended, by section 6 of the
Act of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714), by the Ast of
October 10, 1940 (54 Stat. 1090), by virtue of all
other authority vested in me, and by virtue of the
continued existence of a period of national overgeney, and finding that this Order is in the public
interest and is necessary in the interest of national defense and security, I, FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT,
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, de hereby

preseribe the following:
Section 1. There is hereby established an
Economic Defence Committee (hereinafter referred to

as the "Committee"). The Committee shall consist

of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the
Treasury and the Attorney General. Each member of
the Committee say designate an alternate from among

the officials of his Department and such alternate
may set for such member in all matters relating to
the Committee. The Committee may, in carrying out

the previsions of this Order, act either directly

29

OF through such subcommission agencies OF personnel

as 18 may designate or employ, and, in respect of
matters involving other departments or agencies of
the government, call upon such departments OF

agencies for advisers to sit with the Consistee and

for such information and assistance as may be a
sary.

Section 2. All preelamations, orders and regulations issued under section 5(b) of the Ast of
October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 415), as amended, OF under

section 6 of the Ast of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714),
which are in effect as of the date hereef or are
hereafter issued thorounder, shall be administered
pursuant to the supervision and control of the Committee.
Section 3. The Committee shall engage is such
studies and shall make such recommendations to the

President and to the appropriate departments and
agencies of the Government as the Committee doess

in the interests of the economic defense of the
United States.

Section 4. Any regulation, license, ruling,
instructions or other action by the Secretary of
the Treasury or by the Secretary of state or the
Administrator of Expert Control, as the case may so,
purporting to be under the provisions of any preelsnation, order or regulation heretefore or hereafter
issued under section 5(b) of the Act of October 6,

30

1917 (40 Stat. 415), as anemies, or under see-

tion 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714),
shall be conclusively processed to have been issued

or taken pursuant to the supervision and centrol
of the Committee.

Section 5. This Executive Order may be
amended, modified or revoked at any time.

est

THE WHITE HOUSE,

. 1941.

A-A:DA:GMH

CH

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT

We submit for your consideration a proposed Executive Order establishing an Economic Defense Committee,

consisting of the Secretaries of State and Treasury and
the Attorney General for the purpose of making recommend-

ations to you concerning the control of foreign funds,

foreign trade and related matters, in the interest of
the national defense. The Order would give the Committee

authority to supervise the administration of such freezing
or export control orders as you have issued or may issue.
The purpose of the Order is to coordinate and further
economic defense.

If this proposal meets with your approval, we con-

template designating officers of our respective Departments to work continuously together, keeping in constant
familiarity with our respective views and submitting to
us all recommendations proposéd to be submitted to you.

These officers would have sitting with them advisors
from other departments and agencies of the Government

where the matters under consideration are of interest
to such other departments or agencies. We recommend also

that the Committee be provided with sufficient funds to
employ a small staff to work with the foreign funds control and the Administrator of Export Control in the pre-

paration of data for its consideration.
(Secretary of State

(Secretary of the Treasury

Hisksa

Yun
(Attorney General)
May 5, 1941.

EXECUTIVE ORDER

DEALING WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECONOMIC
DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND RELATED MATTERS

By virtue of and pursuant to the authority
vested in me by section 5(b) of the Aot of October 6,
1917 (40 Stat. 415), as amended, by section 6 of the

Aot of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714), by the Aot of
October 10, 1940 (54 Stat. 1090), by virtue of all
other authority vested in me, and by virtue of the
continued existence of a period of national emergeney, and finding that this Order is in the public
interest and is necessary in the interest of national defense and .security, I, FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT,
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, do hereby

preseribe the following:
Section 1. There is hereby established an
Economic Defence Committee (hereinafter referred to

as the *Committee"). The Committee shall consist

of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the
Treasury and the Attorney General. Each member of
the Committee may designate an alternate from among

the officials of his Department and such alternate
say act for such member in all matters relating to
the Committee. The Committee may, in carrying out

the provisions of this Order, act either directly

or through such subconnittees, agencies or personnel

as it may designate or employ, and, in respect of
matters involving other departments or agencies of
the government, call upon such departments or

agencies for advisors to sit with the Committee and
for such information and assistance as may be needs
sapy.

Section 2. All preclamations, orders and reg.
ulations issued under section 5(b) of the Ast of
October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 415), as amended, or under

section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 724),
which are in effect as of the date hereef or are
hereafter issued thereunder, shall be administered
pursuant to the supervision and control of the Com
mittee.
Section 3. The Committee shall engage in such
studies and shall make such recommendations to the
President and to the appropriate departments and
agencies of the Government as the Committee dooms

in the interests of the economic defense of the
United States.

Section 4. Any regulation, license, ruling,
instructions or other action by the Secretary of
the Treasury or by the Secretary of State or the
Administrator of Export Control, as the ease my be,
purporting to be under the provisions of any proofs
nation, order or regulation heretefore or hereafter

issued under section 5(b) of the Act of October 6

1919 (40 stat. 435), as amended, or under 866-

sion 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714),
shall be conclusively prosumed to have been issued

or taken pursuant to the supervision and control
of the Committee.

Section 5. This Executive Order may be
amended, nodified or revoked at any time.

J

RH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

a 1941.

A-A:DA:GMH

CH

35

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 5, 1941

Secretary Morgenthau

ay

Mr. Pehle

On April 11 I forwarded to you a memorandum

covering the export to Indo-China of certain military
equipment imported from France to the United States

during 1939 and 1940. I suggested that we should not

license the export of this material in the absence of a
written request to that effect from the Secretary of State.
There is attached a letter addressed to you

under date of May 2 by Mr. Hull. In view of such letter,
it would appear that the Treasury should proceed to

license the export of this material, and I will take such
action unless you instruct otherwise.

Joshua
Attachment

36

FILING AUTHORITY

TO: Mail & Files
OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS

ANS.

SECRETARY OF STATE
a.c.

NC ANS. REQ.

INITIAL

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

DATE

WASHINGTON

reply refer to

May 2, 1941

851G.24/37

My dear Mr. Secretary:

I refer to the Department's letter of March 28,
1941 and previous correspondence in regard to an application filed by the French Government in connection

with the proposed exportation to Indochina of the arms,

ammunition, and accessories listed in Mr. Bell's letter
of March 13.

In view of the history of this case, of which you
have already been informed, and in the light of all the
circumstances, I am very strongly of the opinion that
this proposed shipment should be permitted to proceed.

I hope, therefore, that you may find it possible to
direct that such action may be taken by your Department

as may be necessary to permit and facilitate this proposed shipment.

Sincerely yours,

The Honorable

Cordee there

Henry Morgenthau, Jr.,

Secretary of the Treasury.

(original of this was relie to m Pehle)

37

MAY 5 1941

Dear Mr.

I received your letter of April 30 inquiring with respect to
the vault facilities at Fort Knox.
While facilities are now available adequate for the complete
storage purposes you have is mind, is is altogether likely that
gold shipments moving to Fort Knox will utilise such space. There.
fore, is would be inadvicable to plan to use the vaults at Fort
Knox for the purpose of storing all of the materials you mention

is the event 11 should become necessary to reasve them from Weshing-

ton. However, ten cubic feet will de reserved if you so desire for
storage of such of the more important papers as you night designate.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) H. Morgeathau, Jr.

Secretary of the Treasury.

Honorable Archibeld HeeLeish,
The Libraries of Congress,
Weshington, D. 0.

-

38
COPY

THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS

Washington, D. C.

April 30, 1941
My dear Mr. Secretary:

At hearings before the House Subcommittee on the

Legislative Bill on Friday, the Chairman of the Committee,

The Honorable Emmet O'Neal, of Kentucky, asked me what

steps the Library is taking for the security of its most

valuable possessions - the Declaration of Independence, the
Constitution, the Gutenberg Bible, the Washington papers,
and other manuscripts and holdings of unique value and

irreplaceable character. I described to him at some
length the actions taken by the Library and told him that
the question of the place of deposit of these in valuable
materials had not been determined. He asked me whether
I had thought of the vaults at Fort Knox as a possibility
and I told him that I had but had taken no steps to in-

quire whether space might be available.
I am turning to you at the suggestion of the Committee to inquire whether space might perhaps be found at

Fort Knox for these materials in the unlikely event that
it becomes necessary to remove them from Washington.

Altogether, I should guess that the materials of the
category in question would not exceed a few thousand
cubic feet in bulk.

Faithfully yours,
/s/ Archibald MacLeish
Archibald MacLeish

The Librarian of Congress
The Honorable

Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

The Secretary of the Treasury

Treasury Department
Washington, D. C.

39

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 5, 1941

Secretary Morgenthau

TO

Mr. Haas

FROM

Subject:

A review of appropriations for aid to agriculture
in the light of the new situation created by the
defense effort

In your testimony of April 24 before the House Ways and

Means Committee you suggested that Congress might re-examine

the expenditures for aid to agriculture as one of the possible
means of reducing non-defense Government spending, and you
mentioned that the statistics did not seem to show much correlation between these expenditures and farm incomes.

This memorandum, prepared in response to your request,

is intended (1) to explain further the lack of correlation
between farm incomes and the Federal expenditures for aid
to agriculture, (2) to point out recent improvements in the

agricultural situation which make advisable a re-examination
of the proposed agricultural expenditures, and (3) to suggest

answers to arguments which may be made against reductions in

agricultural subsidies.
1. Expenditures for agriculture compared with farm income
Chart comparison shows little correlation

A chart comparison between annual farm income (excluding
Government payments) and fiscal-year budgetary expenditures

for aid to agriculture since 1933, shows little apparent re-

lationship between the two. (See Chart 1, attached, and data
in Table 1.) There have been wide percentage changes from year
to year in the expenditures for aid to agriculture, (see Table 2)

yet these likewise show little correlation with the percentage
changes in farm income.

These observations are not intended as a criticism of
the agricultural program, which is designed to improve the
position of agriculture in many ways aside from incomes.
Outside influences, furthermore, have doubtless obscured the

relationship in certain years. Nevertheless, the figures
covering the experience of the past eight years do not indi-

cate that we can confidently expect farm income to increase
or decrease with changes in expenditures for agriculture by a

greater amount than the expenditures themselves.

40
2-

Increase in farm subsidies during past several years
That the basic agricultural problem has not been solved
by the payment of subsidies to farmers was brought out in
the hearings on the Department of Agriculture appropriation
bill before the House subcommittee, January 7, 1941, from
which the following testimony is quoted:
Mr. Cannon (Chairman), to Mr. Appleby. "Now, judging
from the figures which you have submitted here and which
have been handed me by the clerk, there is a rather significant increase each year in the amount of subsidies

paid the farmer. For example, in 1936, according to

these figures, in addition to the farmer's receipts in
the market, you gave him Government checks which amounted
to 2.9 percent of his total income. In 1937, the situation was 80 increasingly unfavorable in the market that

you had to increase the amount of the Government checks

until they amounted to 3.5 percent. In 1938, it was
necessary to further increase the subsidies from the
Federal Treasury until they amounted to 5.2 percent of
the farmer's income and, for 1939, prices in the market
were 80 inadequate that it is now necessary to pay the
farmer -- and we are paying the farmer this year -8.3 percent of his income, from the Federal Treasury.
From your figures here it is apparent instead of the
farmer's condition improving under the present system
the contrary 18 true and it is less effective each year
from 1936 to 1939. So, according to this report, if
the trend continues, it would be necessary to have an
increase in the subsidies from the Federal Treasury in
1942, instead of a decrease.

Mr. Appleby. I agree with your conclusion, but I
think the inference 18 not entirely in accord with all

of the facts in the picture; that is, it was not that

the farm situation was progressively worse, but that
we did progressively a better job of supplementing the
farmer's income.

Mr. Cannon. But certainly his income in the market

was inadequate -- more inadequate each year.

Mr. Appleby. Yes; certainly.
Mr. Cannon. And the prospect is that, in 1942, it
will be still more inadequate?

41

-3- Mr. Appleby. Yes, sir.
Mr. Cannon. And increased subsidies will be necessary,

unless some other method is provided by Congress?

Mr. Appleby. Yes; definitely.
Farm incomes closely correlated with industrial activity
In contrast to its lack of correlation with Federal

agricultural expenditures, farm income shows a very high de-

gree of correlation with domestic business activity. The
closeness of relationship between the two is indicated by
Chart 2, in which the trend of industrial activity as measured
by the Federal Reserve Board index (1935-1939 - 100) is compared with an index of real income of farmers (1.e., farm
income, exclusive of Government payments, adjusted for changes

in prices of goods farmers buy).
The unusually close relationship between industrial activity and real income of farmers, as shown on this chart,
bears out the belief that agricultural recovery has been only
awaiting a renewed improvement in consumer purchasing power.
As stated by Mr. H. R. Tolley, Chief of the Bureau of
Agricultural Economics: "Over nine-tenths of the cash income
from farm production is derived from the money income of
consumers in the domestic market." (Speech before American
Economic Association, December 28, 1940.)

2. A re-examination of expenditures for agricultural aid
seems called for

A marked improvement has occurred in the agricultural

situation under the defense program. Agricultural purchasing power in 1940, excluding Government payments, reached the
highest level since 1929, and the addition of Government
payments carried it above the 1929 peak. A further increase
is in prospect for 1941. The national emergency responsible

for the original farm subsidies in 1933 is clearly past. It

has been replaced by another emergency involving the financing of the huge expenditures for national defense.
Even had the present financing emergency not arisen,

the fact that agricultural purchasing power is again strongly
on the upgrade would call for a tapering off in farm subsidies,
in contemplation of renewed help in the next recession.

42

Improvement in consumer purchasing power raising farm incomes

The sharp increase in employment and payrolls in recent
months, together with the increased demand for farm products
under the defense program, has brought a marked improvement

in the outlook for farm incomes. Industrial production has
reached a level far above any previous peak; within the past

year 2,400,000 workers have gone back into employment, and a
strong increase in the purchasing power of consumers is under
way.

This has begun to have its inevitable effect on farm in-

comes. Speaking before the House subcommittee on the

Department of Agriculture appropriation bill early in January,
Secretary Wickard said:

"Agricultural cash income for 1940 -- $9,000,000,000 --

was the second highest since 1929. Even more important

from the standpoint of the farmer and the entire nation,
is the fact that the agricultural purchasing power is
higher than it was in 1929
"The prospect for this year, for the calendar year 1941,
in respect to farm income, is even brighter. I think that
farmers will have a total income in 1941 of at least a
half billion dollars more than they had in 1940.
An outlook for continued improvement is currently predicted by the Bureau of Agricultural Economics. As stated
in the April issue of The Demand and Price Situation:
"Consumer demand for farm products will continue to improve
in the remainder of 1941 under the stimulus of rising employ-

ment and consumer incomes brought about by the defense
program."

A reflection of this is seen in a substantial rise in

prices of farm products since the defense program got under
way, a rise which actually began on the outbreak of war in
September 1939. (See Chart 3.) The increase in prices has
been particularly sharp during the past month, when the
Department of Agriculture price index rose to 110, as com-

pared with 98 a year earlier. The farmers' position has been
further improved by the fact that very little increase has
occurred in the prices of things bought by farmers. In comparison with the increase of 12 percent in farm prices since
April 1940, prices of goods bought by farmers have risen less
than 1 percent.

43

-5Parity and soil conservation payments
especially need re-examining

While all items of Federal expenditures for agriculture
will need to be reviewed, it seems rather obvious that parity

payments and soil conservation payments in particular need reexamining under the present changed conditions.
In his testimony before the House subcommittee early in

January, Secretary Wickard said that "the first order in our
farm program is to avoid production of too burdensome supplies
A considerable part of the $500,000,000 of appropriations for the farm program will go toward limiting acreage in
various surplus crops.

Since that time, the need for restricting production has

been changed in several important respects:

(1) The passage of the lend-lease act has increased the

British requirements for various food products in this
country, which has led the Department of Agriculture to adopt
measures for stimulating the production of certain products.
(2) The recent rise in commodity prices, under the pressure of expanded consumer and industrial buying, demands an

increased supply of various products to hold back inflationary tendencies.

(3) The diversion of labor from the farms to the industrial centers and to training camps will tend to reduce
agricultural production without Federal assistance.
Under these changed conditions, the appropriation of

half a billion dollars for crop reduction, at a time when our
financing problem requires the curtailment of unnecessary
Governmental expenditures, would seem particularly unwise.
Buying for Britain replacing surplus-disposal program

While the budget estimate for fiscal year 1942 contemplated
expenditures of $200,000,000 for the disposal of surplus commodities, our surplus problems are rapidly being solved by the
great improvement in demand for industrial materials and food-

stuffs resulting from the defense program. On top of this, a
considerable part of the huge lend-lease appropriations will
be used to purchase agricultural products for Great Britain,

which should eliminate the need of continued appropriations
for surplus disposal.

44

-6Some of the activities under this appropriation have
become clearly superfluous. In the case of cotton textiles,
for example, although the cotton mills are operating at the
highest rate on record, and finding increasing difficulty in
making delivery on defense and civilian orders, funds are still
being expended under the surplus-disposal program to increase
the immediate consumption of cotton goods. This 18 done

through export subsidies on cotton goods, as well as subsidies
on certain cotton products consumed domestically. Most of these
efforts, according to the Department of Agriculture, "have been
expanded so that their effect on cotton consumption will probably be greater this season than last." Meanwhile, the average

price of cotton goods has risen 17 per cent since the first of
the year.

3.

Probable argument s for continued large subsidies to
agriculture

The chief arguments against curtailment of agricultural
subsidies will probably center around the following points:
(1) "Farm incomes have not yet reached parity levels,
while incomes of other workers are above parity.
In answer to this argument, it may be said that the

parity income idea is difficult to understand, since it

demands a "freezing" of conditions as they existed during
a temporary period 25 or 30 years ago, with no allowance for
change or progress that has been made since then. There is
no basis for assuming that the period 1910-1914 represented
a "normal" period in the national economy.
(2) "Labor groups are getting big wage increases, and
farmers should get similar increases.
In answer, it may be said that with nine-tenths of
all farm products going to domestic consumers, farmers will
inevitably share, and are already beginning to share, in the
wage increases that laborers are getting. Next to 1940, the
best recent year for farm income was 1937, and that also
happened to be a year when wages were unusually high. The
Bureau of Agricultural Economics says: "With further increases
in the income of industrial workers in prospect, the upward
trend of farm income is expected to continue."

(3) "Incomes of certain sections of the farm population,

particularly in the South, are still distressingly low."

45

-7 In answer, one can only be sympathetic toward raising
the incomes of all underpaid groups, if Government fi-

nances would permit. Similar groups exist in the cities

as well as on farms, but farmers have the advantage of
home-raised foods and other products, which do not appear
in their cash income figures.

(4) "Agriculture is getting a decreasing percentage of

the national income."

A gradual decline in the proportion of national income
going to agriculture is not necessarily a tendency to be
deplored, but on the contrary represents a continuation of
our trend from a predominantly agricultural nation toward
an industrialized nation. It should be kept in mind that
the farm population in 1940 was at almost exactly the same
level as in 1910, at 32,000,000, while the non-agricultural
population has increased steadily from 59,000,000 in 1910
to almost 99,000,000 in 1940.

46
Table 1

Farm income and Government aid to agriculture

(In millions of dollars)

1934

4,682
5,278
6,273

-

131 2

7,542

573

1936

8,212

287

1938
1939

1940

8,788
7,652
7,861

8,354

367

482
807

766

1933

209

1934

780

1935

1,076

1936

938

1937

976

1938

860

1939

1,235

1940

1,567

5,409
6,317

6,969

agriculture 1/

4,682

44

1935

1937

1

:marketings: payments :

:

:
:

1933

:

1932

Federal budget-

Income from
:Fiscal: ary expenditures
Farm
for aid to
:Government: Total
year :
:

year

:

Calendar

:

Farm income

8,499

9,155
8,134
8,668
9,120

Annual report of the Secretary of the Treasury 1940,

p. 652, Table 8.
2 No Government payments reported prior to August, 1933.

47
Table 2

Percentage changes in farm income

and Government aid to agriculture

:Farm income excluding :

Federal budgetary

:

expenditures for aid to
Percent
:Fiscal:
agriculture 2/
Calendar:
Percent
:Millions:
Millions :change over: year
year
of
change over
of dollars: preceding
:dollars :preceding year
: year
Government payments 1/:
:

:

1934
1935

1936
1937
1938
1939
1940

1

2

5,278
6,273
6,969
8,212
8,788

7,652
7,861
8,354

:

1933

4,682

:

1932

-

t 12.7
t 18.9
t 11.1

t 17.8

t 7.0
- 12.9

t 2.7
t 6.3

Department of Agriculture

1933

209

1934

780

t 273.2

1935

1,076

t 37.9

1936

938

-

1937

976

t

4.1

1938

860

-

11.9

t

43.6

1939 1,235
1940

1,567

-

12.8

t 26.9

Annual report of the Secretary of the Treasury, 1940, p. 652,
Table 8.

48

FARM INCOME (EXCLUDING GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS) AND
FEDERAL AID TO AGRICULTURE
DOLLARS

DOLLARS

Billions

Billions

8

9

9
8

Farm Income
7

7
6

6
5

5

4

4

3
3
2

2

Aid to Agiculture
I
I
0

0

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

1937

1938

1939

1940

1941

1942

"Federal budgetary expenditures for aid to agriculture. fiscal year basis
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury

- of Research - -

C-389

63

REAL INCOME OF FARMERS AND INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
Indexes, 1935-'39=100

PERCENT
PERCENT

140
140

130
130

120

Real Farm Income

.

120

Excluding Government Payments
110
110

100
100

90
90

80
80

70
70

Industrial Production
Fed. Res. Bd.

60
60

50
50

40
1925

1926

1927

1928

1929

1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

1937

1938

1939

1940

1941

40

1942

*Adjusted for prices paid by Farmers
C-388
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury

of - and

50

PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS AND RATIO TO PRICES PAID
1939

1940

1941
PERCENT

PERCENT

115

115

110

110

105

105

Prices Received
Aug 1909-July 1914=100
100

100

95

95

90

90

85

85

80

80
M

M

J

S

N

J

M

M

J

S

N

M

J

M

J

N

S

J

(RATIO)

(RATIO)

90

90

Ratio of Prices Received
to Prices Paid

85

85

80

80

75

75

70

70
J

M

M

J

1939

S

N

J

M

M

J

S

1940

N

J

M

M

J

s

N

1941

Source: Department of Agriculture
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury

/ Research and -

P-213

51

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE MAY 5 1941

Secretary Morgenthau

Mr. Foley

American Viscose Corporation

1. On Friday morning, May 2, Mr. Harold Stanley telephoned

me, requesting that I see Messrs. Brownell and Fisher of Davis, Polk,
Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed to discuss the closing agreement on the

alternative methods for recapitalizing American Viscose. Numerous
conferences had been held at the Bureau of Internal Revenue but
Stanley was unwilling to accept conditions we deemed necessary to

prevent the closing agreement from being used as an instrument for
tax avoidance.

2. The need for a hedge clause arose from a provision in the
agreement between Sir Edward Peacock and Morgan Stanley that "in

the event that the Securities to be Resold shall not be resold

as provided in Article VI within six months after the date of this
Agreement, the aggregate purchase price shall be $36,456,000."

The Article VI referred to provides that Morgan Stanley and Dillon

Read "will use their best efforts to resell all of the Securities
to be Resold" at a price which will provide the British Treasury
with something more than $36,456,000. In the light of current
market conditions and world events, Morgan Stanley and their
associates when the six months expire on September 15, 1941 might

52

-2find that for $36,456,000 they have become the owners of American

Viscose, a corporation with a surplus and reserve of $66,000,000 in

addition to a capital of $49,000,000. In the event this contingency
did develop, the Bureau desired to leave open for determination on
the facts as they were then revealed whether (a) Morgan Stanley and

associates in the guise of a recapitalization effected the distribution of earnings and profits, the amount so distributed being tax-

able as a stock dividend, or (b) in the guise of an underwriting
agreement acquired a rich corporation on the cheap, the difference
being taxable as additional compensation.

3. At the conference in my office, which was attended by Messrs.
Brownell and Fisher for Morgan Stanley, Messrs. Wenchel, Mooney and

Blandi for the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and also Messrs. Sullivan

and Kades, I reviewed the problem very frankly. I called attention
to the troublesome clause, stating bluntly that it seemed to me an
outrageous bargain, to which Mr. Brownell replied that the British
had insisted that there be an outright sale and that Morgan Stanley
had not had sufficient time to determine the true worth of American
Viscose. However, when I pointed out to him that the British could

not have any objection to the deletion of this clause if the Treasury
were agreeable, Mr. Brownell demurred against any deletion. Finally,

I told Mr. Brownell that the Treasury could not go any further than
to give an advance ruling that no taxable income would be realized

53

3-

as a result of the recapitalization of American Viscose if Morgan

Stanley and their associates carried out their representation of
merely acting on behalf of the British Treasury to dispose of all
the stock in American Viscose which they hold to the investing public

for as much as possible, but that the ruling must provide that if
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that they had not

exercised their best efforts to dispose of the securities, it would
be of no effect. Later Mr. Brownell telephoned Mr. Stanley who,

after conferring with Mr. Dillon, stated that such a ruling would be

satisfactory and that they appreciated our efforts to facilitate the
sale of the stock to the public.

4. It is proposed to file shortly with the SEC a registration
statement under which the 491,000 shares of common stock of Viscose

now outstanding will be reclassified into 400,000 shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $100 per share, and 1,500,000 shares of
common stock. Of the outstanding shares, 448,000 shares are held by the
Morgan Stanley group, 24,000 shares by Courtaulds, Ltd., about 17,000

shares seem to be controlled by the Salvage family, and the remaining

2,000 shares are owned by six other shareholders. The ruling will
provide that the changes made in the capital structure of Viscose

will not result in taxable income to the minority shareholders and
that the basis of the old stock surrendered by them will become the

basis of the reclassified securities received in exchange. Of course,

54

-4if the sale goes through as contemplated the difference between the
amount received by the Morgan Stanley group and the amount paid to

the British Treasury will constitute taxable income to the members
of the Morgan Stanley group. Assuming a resale price of $100,000,000

for all the shares, Morgan Stanley and their associates would realize
an underwriting fee of slightly less than $8,000,000 plus all expenses.
The resale price has not, however, been fixed.
5. On Saturday, May 3, Commissioner Helvering signed a ruling
addressed to Morgan Stanley & Company and Dillon, Read & Company along

the lines indicated above which all of us feel protects the revenue,
gives an added incentive to Morgan Stanley and Dillon Read to sell

the stock, thereby increasing the amount the British will receive,
and keeps the Government in the saddle.

i.es 7L.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

55
Office of the Secretary
Technical Assistant to the Secretary
Date

May 5. 1941

'0:

Secretary Morgenthau
Room

I believe you should read this before

I pass it on to Mr. Wiley.

Could you speak
to me Home about

this, please
From: MR. DIETRICH

56

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 5. 1941
TO

Mr. Wiley

FROM

Mr. Cochran

You told me by telephone this noon of the meeting held in the Treasury this
morning in which Assistant Secretary Gaston and yourself participated, along with

Minister Gordon from the State Department, Mr. Butterworth from Commerce Department

and various other representatives, including the Army, Navy and F. B. I. You asked
that I give you a report of the contacts which I have for obtaining information con-

cerning foreign countries, particularly the British Empire, and also an indication
as to the type of information which I receive. I have pleasure in citing the following facts concerning the office of the Technical Assistant to the Secretary. of which

I am in charge.

This office receives for the Secretary a large number of representatives of
foreign missions in this country, both the permanent diplomatic establishments and
visiting officials. Sometimes I deal with these people; on other occasions the

Secretary has me present when he receives them. During the past year and one half
countries whose representatives I have seen most frequently are: Great Britain,
France, China, Switzerland, Sweden, Belgium, Finland, Poland, Spain, Argentina,
Hungary, The Netherlands and Japan. It has been the Secretary's instruction that

Treasury contact with the British shall be through my office.

Mr. Pinsent. Financial Counselor of the British Embassy, is one of my regular
callers. In his absence. Mr. Opie has contact with me. Through these officers the
British Embessy ordinarily presents any financial subjects which it desires to discuss with the Treasury. Both of these individuals talk with me rather freely.
Mr. Stopford, who is a representative of the Ministry of Economic Warfare on
the British Embassy staff, is in constant touch with me. He calls me frequently on
the telephone and writes me numerous informal letters. Furthermore, he delivers to
me each week several score of memoranda, in duplicate, usually consisting of intercepts obtained by agents of his Ministry, principally at Bermuda. These intercepts
deal with a large range of subjects and are of particular interest to our Foreign
Funds Control. Upon the receipt of such documents, I immediately send one set to
Mr. Pehle, in charge of Foreign Funds Control. who is then responsible for the utilization of this material in his own division and for distribution thereof to members
of our Control Committee. When there is anything of particular interest to the
Secretary. I mention it to him or show him the document. Mr. Stopford sometimes
calls personally to present this material and we discuss British problems of economic
Warfare, as well as steps that can properly be taken by the United States toward
cooperation. In agreement with Assistant Secretary Gaston and Mr. Pehle, it has
been decided that Mr. Stopford should also see them. the former on shipping matters
and the latter on Foreign Funds Control questions. In the absence of Mr. Stopford,
Mr. Auburn has contact with my office.

57
2

Since Sir Frederick Phillips and r.Playfair of the British Treasury arrived
in this country last Autumn, they have been regular visitors with me. I act as

intermediary for the Secretary in obtaining from them material as to their dollar
exchange position. future requirements etc. Mr. Allen, also of the British Treasury
Mission, provides statistics.
Since the arrival in New York in December 1939 of Mr. T. J. Carlyle Gifford,
I have been the Treasury's contact with him in regard to the disposal of British-held
American securities. Likewise, I have performed the same function in relation to
Sir Edward Peacock, who came to the United States in January of this year to look

after the disposal of British direct investments in this country. I receive daily

reports from Mr. Gifford and have frequent conversations by telephone with him and
Sir Edward Peacock.

My office receives from the Department of State copies of cablegrams emanating
from the American Foreign Service which require Treasury action or are of interest
to the Treasury Department. These cablegrams are referred to the appropriate divisions
of the Treasury, when not acted upon by my office. Copies of messages providing

information are sent by me to the officials in the Treasury most likely to be interested therein. Likewise, my office receives copies of diplomatic and consular reports

to the State Department upon financial, economic, monetary and related subjects.

When material of special interest to the Secretary or any particular division is observed, steps are taken by my office to bring the material to the attention of the
Secretary or the appropriate official. This material is then forwarded to the Division
of Monetary Research where it is indexed and filed.

With direct telephone lines to the Federal Reserve Bank at New York, my office
is in communication many times daily with Vice President Knoke and other officials of
that bank. Mr. Knoke keeps me informed as to any unusual movements on the foreign
exchange market and with respect to transactions of interest in foreign accounts held
with the Federal Reserve Bank as well as with the important commercial banks. It
should be noted that some months ago the duty of obtaining a detailed flow of information concerning foreign accounts in New York banks was delegated to Mr. Wiley's sec-

tion. Since then I have not attempted to duplicate this work, but do obtain information
of current interest on important transactions during the course of my several conversations daily with the Federal. My office receives a variety of daily and weekly reports

from the Federal upon foreign accounts and business therein.

The handling of gold purchases and sales and silver purchases is taken care of
by my office. This involves keeping informed through a variety of sources upon gold
holdings in this country and abroad, gold movements and problems related thereto. In
the licensing of gold transactions involving blocked countries, my office works closely
with Foreign Funds Control, on the Committee of which I serve.

The Secretary frequently sends me to Secretary Hull's office to obtain current

information on foreign affairs likely to be of interest to the Treasury, particularly
in its financing operations. Many officers in the Department of State call upon me,
as a Foreign Service colleague in the Secretary's office. for assistance in bringing
various problems to the attention of the Secretary or his assistants. Also as a result
of my service under the Department of State, I receive numerous Foreign Service Officers

58

-3while in Washington on leave from their foreign posts, as well as visitors to the
United
States from areas where I have served or introduced to me by my colleagues
abroad.

Finally, a number of my central banking friends in Europe continue to write me.
when feasible, personal letters in regard to conditions in their respective areas.
I have given the above full outline of my means of obtaining information, but
any decision as to the extent to which some of it, particularly that on Great Britain,
should be pooled through an inter-departmental committee, should rest with Secretary

Norgenthau.

o

59

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
wing

DATE May 5. 1941.
TO

Secretary Morgenthau

FROM

Mr. Cochran

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Stopford of the British Embassy telephoned me this afternoon at
o'clock. He had just received word of three important withdrawals of United
States currency by Podesta, the representative in New York of the Italian Foreign
Exchange Institute and the Bank of Italy. On April 22, Podesta withdrew from
the Bank of Naples in New York $92,000, of which $64,000 was for the Italian
Exchange Institute and $28,000 for the Bank of Naples. On the 26th of April, he
withdrew $68,000, of which $42,000 was for the Italian Exchange Institute and
$26,000 for the Bank of Naples. On April 28, Podesta took out $31,000 in United
States currency, of which $10,000 was for the Bank of Naples. Stopford believes
that much of this currency is lodged with the Consul General of Italy in New York.
3

Amp

60

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE

TO

FROM

May 5. 1941

Secretary Morgenthan
Mr. Cochran

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
At 4 o'clock this evening, Lieutenant Stevens told me that Miss Warner
the Academy of Political Science, with offices at Columbia University
(branch 81 on University 4-3200) had called, seeking information in regard to
Professor Keynes' arrival. Being personally acquainted with Miss Warner, I called
her back to tell her that we know the Professor was coming over but had no information as to the exact date. Furthermore, I had spoken with the British Embassy
this afternoon and my contact there had confirmed my understanding that the British,
following their usual practice in these war times, had not divulged the date of
Professor Keynes' departure from Europe or expected arrival in the United States.
I told Miss Warner that I would be glad to let her know when I had any definite
information, but expected that the press would have this as soon as the Treasury.
Miss Warner seemed to appreciate our position, but still thought that she could
obtain specific information at once through Minister Campbell in the Briti sh Embassy
of

or through cabling to London.

61 (NOT TO BE PUBLISHED AS
OFFICIAL INFORMATION)

COPY

Buenos Aires, May 5. 1941.
No. 2371

Subject:

AGREEMENTS WITH ARGENTINA PROVIDING FOR A CREDIT BY THE EXPORTIMPORT BANK OF WASHINGTON AND A STABILIZATION LOAN: MESSAGE
SENT TO THE ARGENTINE CONGRESS ON APRIL 1, 1941, TRANSMITTING
DRAFT LAW.

The Honorable

The Secretary of State,
Washington.
Sir:

I have the honor to enclose a clipping from La Nacion of April 2 last
purporting to contain the text of a message sent to Congress the day previous
by the Executive Power transmitting a draft law intended to approve the
agreements concluded in Washingtonlast December which provided for a credit

by the Export-Import Bank of Washington and a stabilization loan, as well as

containing the text of the bill itself. There is also enclosed a translation
of that part of the clipping purporting to give the texts of the two documents.
The Department will recall that the Argentine Government endeavored to

obtain Congressional approval of, or authorization for, these transactions in
the 1941 budget bill, which has been pending in Congress since last December

(the Embassy's despatch no. 1874 of January 27. 1941) and in the bill to

provide for the financing of the so-called "Pinedo Plan", also still pending
in Congress (the Embassy's despatches nos. 1705 of December 20, 1940, and

1763 of January 7. 1941). As has been reported on various occasions, however,

there has been considerable criticism here, as represented by a series of

leading editorials in La Prensa, of the Government's efforts to obtain the

62
-2authorisation for these credit operations by provisions in legislation designed

primarily for other purposes rather than by specific legislation affording
adequate opportunity for Congressional consideration of the transactions.

In view of the action taken to meet this criticism, it is interesting to
note that no reference is made in the draft law submitted to Congress on April 1

to the two transactions which the bill seeks to approve. Also it is noteworthy
that the accompanying message states that the Executive Power considers that,

in view of the situation created by the war, it is advisable to request Congress
for authorization to conclude similar arrangements in the future, and that Article

1 of the draft law is apparently designed to provide authorisation for future
transactions as well as for approval of the arrangements already concluded.
Respectfully yours,
Norman Armour

Enclosure: Translation from
La Nacion.

On.

851.
JWG:dK

A true copy of the signed original
Copytalm 5-26-41

63
(Enclosure no. 1 to despatch no. 2371)
(TRANSLATION)

Exerpt from article appearing in LA NACION on April 2, 1941 under
the caption "The Executive Power Requests Legal Authorization for

Accepting the Credit of 110,000,000 Dollars

The difficulties attending our foreign trade - says the message in
its opening paragraph - especially since the middle of last year when the
war situation became graver, are well known. Measures taken by the
belligerents due to war activities have caused the disappearance of
important markets in continental Europe and have placed, at the same time,
our trade with the British Empire upon a basis of compensation accounts,
with a corresponding bilateral immobilisation of currencies.
The demand for products which we formerly purchased in countries

directly affected by hostilities has been orientated toward the United
States, thus producing a considerable deficit in the amount of our dollar
availabilities. It has been necessary to establish rigorous restrictions
on imports without being able by these means to avoid the export of

considerable amounts of gold.

The prospects for this year do not appear any brighter. It will be
necessary to continue a rigorous limitation of imports which are essential
to us. Nevertheless, the importation of products vital to national economy
will have to be maintained by all means within our power, if we wish to
avoid serious dislocation in trade and industry.
The Executive Power understanding the gravity of the situation and
confronted with the temporary closing of practically all the usual money
markets, sought, with the cooperation of the Government of the United States
of America, a temporary solution of the problem, arranging with the
authorities of the friendly country the necessary credits. Our reputation
of sealous fulfilment of our obligations has permitted us to resort to

external credit in these difficult times.

The negotiations have had satisfactory results, and two credit operations have been arranged for a total of 110 million dollars, which will be

made available as soon as the Executive Power can announce that it has

received the pertinent legal authorization from Congress. This author
rization was requested in article 16 of the bill accompanying the

message of the Executive Power of December 23, 1940, at which time the
negotiations had not yet been concluded.

In view of the importance of the transactions concluded and their
objects, the Executive Power considers it advisable to submit them to the
approval of Congress in a special bill.

64
-2-

Terms of the Agreements

By one of the agreements concluded, the Export-Import Bank of Washington
has granted to the Central Bank, with the guarantee of the Argentine
Government, a credit of 60 million dollars for the purpose of paying for the
importation of products from the United States. The funds may be utilized

in monthly installments of five million dollars. An annual interest of

3.6% will be paid quarterly and the repayment of the credit will be made in
semi-annual installments, the first amortization being 18 months from the
date of each advance, the obligations to mature within eight and one half
years.

The other operation, for which the approval of Congress is also necessary,
has been arranged between the Central Bank and the Secretary of the Treasury

of the United States of America. The Stabilization Fund of the United States
Treasury, through the intermediary of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
will buy pesos, at the Central Bank's request up to the amount of 50,000,000
dollars, which may be applied to payments of any character.

Rotative Credit of 1 1/2% Interest

This operation, which is in reality a rotative credit, has character-

istics in operation and technique similar to the arrangements made by the
Stabilization Fund of the United States Treasury, the Bank of England and
the Bank of France, although due to the wider scope of the credit itself,

it constitutes a newform of international cooperation in the field of finance.

The interest agreed upon is 1 1/2% and due to the rotative character of the

credit, there is not fixed any definite date of maturity.

As already stated, the credits will become effective as soon as the
approval of Congress has been obtained and the Executive Power has sent the
necessary communications.

Internal Funds for the Purchase of Products

The utilization of these credits will bring relief to our position with
respect to free exchange in the immediate future, creating at the same time

available internal funds with which to finance the purchase of agricultural
products not easily saleable in foreign markets.
The double internal and external aspect of the utilization of the credits
renders impossible an exact correletion between the position of exchange and
the peso requirements, which leads us to foresee an abundance of funds in the
money market at certain times and scarcity of cash at other times.
The Central Bank as a money-regulating organism, should be always
prepared to immobilize (cancelar) the excessive funds. thus avoiding any
unnecessary expansion of the means of payment and assuring, at the same time,

the liquidity of the resources of the banks.

--

65

The Executive Power, foreseeing that the difficulties in our economy
produced by the dislocation of foreign trade will continue as long as the
hostilities last and even during the period following, considera it
advisable to request the auhorisation of Congress to conclude similar
transactions in the future with the same purpose of attenuating insofar as
possible the effects of changes in the channels of trade that we are
witnessing at the present time.
But the use of credit in these circumstances is only a temporary
expedient during the period of emergency. The permanent solution of our

difficulties will be found in an increase of our exports. The markets of
this continent, and especially those of the United States, offer advantageous
possibilities for the placing of many articles of our national production.
The Executive Power, with the support of Congress. is resolved to give its
assistance to every effort of industry and trade for taking advantage of
these opportunities.

Provisions of the Bill
The text of the Bill is as follows:
Article 1 - The Executive Power is authorized to conclude with the Treasury
of the United States, the Export-Import Bank of Washington and with other
financial organizations abroad arrangements for the purpose of obtaining

exchange to cover the deficit of the external accounts and to facilitate
operations of monetary regulation. The similar transactions concluded by
the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic, which have the guarantee accorded
in each case by the National Executive Power, upon the approval by decree of

the respective contracts, shall be considered obligations of the Argentine

Nation.

Article 2 - The proceeds in national currency of the transactions which the
Central Bank may conclude in accordance with the preceding article, may be

deposited in banks of the country or invested in Treasury bills or in

obligations issued by the National Government to finance the purchase of
agricultural or cattle products which cannot find their usual market abroad.

Article 3 - The obligations issued to finance the purchase of products
subscribed by the banks according to Law 12, 156, as well as other credits
which these may grant for the same purpose, may not exceed 500 million pesos

without prejudice to the obligations which may be turned over to the Bank of
the Argentine Nation to cancel the existing debt to date for that purpose.
Article 4 - The income from the Exchange Profit Fund shall be applied insofar
as may be necessary to the payment of interest service and amortisation of
obligations issued to finance the purchase of products referred to in this
law.

66
Article 5 - The banks which subscribe obligations issued for financing
the purchase of products may arrange with the Central Bank of the Argentine
Republic the terms under which the Central Bank will acquire the said
obligations, crediting these amounts in the respective cash accounts. The
Central Bank may assume this obligation only to take care of the requirements of funds that are not produced by an expansion of credit.
Article 6 - The obligations issued to finance the purchase of products which
have been acquired by the Central Bank may be used by this Bank in operations
of monetary regulation similar to those effected with consolidated bonds of
the National Treasury.

Article 7 - The provisions of this law shall remain in effect until one year
after the termination of the European war, but in no case for a period in

excess of three years. The governmental banks of the Nation and provinces,
private banks and semi-governmental banks, are authorised to participate
in the operations contemplated to in the above articles.

Tr:BSB

Typed: AMJ

COPY:=g:5/26/41

67
C

0

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

Y

CONFIDENTIAL

May 5. 1941.

OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
To

Files

From

W. H. Rozell

Subject: Transfer of Japanese Funds
from New York to Brazil

(Copies to Messrs. Knoke, McKeon, Reelse, and Sanford)

For many months the Japanese authorities have been taking steps in anticipation of a possible blocking of Japanese funds in this country. As early as
last October, State Department cables from Rio de Janeiro told of negotiations
on the part of the Yokohama Specie Bank to effect a transfer of their dollar

funds to Brazil. The first indication of this was given in the State Department
cable from Brazil, dated October 31 (No. 544), in which it was stated that inquiry

had been made of the Bank of Brazil whether, in view of the possible blocking of
Japanese funds in the United States, it would consent to the centralization in
that bank of all financial operations of Japan usually handled in the United States.
The Director of Exchange of the Bank of Brazil replied that the bank could see no

objection to such a plan. With these preliminaries settled, the Rio de Janeiro

branch of the Yokohama Specie Bank informed the Bank of Brazil in the early part
of November, 1940 that they would take steps to centralize all its operations in
dollar exchange in the Bank of Brazil. The final arrangements were made at the

end of December, 1940 when the head office of the Yokohama Specie Bank in Japan

formally requested the Bank of Brazil to open a dollar account, which would be
subject to deposits and withdrawals by the manager of the Rio de Janeiro branch
of the Yokohama Specie Bank. The Bank of Brazil granted the request.
From the time of first learning of the desire of the Yokohama Specie Bank

to transfer their dollar assets to Brazil, we have given special attention to the
weekly reports filed with us by the New York Agency of the Yokohama Specie Bank.
However, since there were many ways in which a transfer of Japanese funds to Brazil

could be effected without it being fully reflected in the weekly reports, which

give only the amount outstanding as of each Wednesday, it was suggested in my
memorandum of March 26, 1941 that we ask the cooperation of those New York banks inform

carrying an account for the New York Agency of the Yokohama Specie Bank to

us of all large debits and credits to the account of Yokohama Specie Bank.
From these reports, which we are now receiving from Chase, Guaranty, transferred, and the

National City Bank, it was learned that on April 21 $2,000,000 was to the account
on the books of National City, from the Yokohama Specie Bank account by
of the Bank of Brazil. A similar transfer of $1,000,000 was also reported
Guaranty on the same day. In view of these operations, Mr. McKeon been then requested similar

Chase, Guaranty, and National City to determine whether there had Going any back

operations before they started in April filing daily reports with us. their books
to the first of the year, these banks found several large transfers on to us.

totaling $10,000,000 (net), in addition to the $3,000,000 already reported
All transfers since the beginning of 1941, as reported by the three banks, are
summarized below.

68
-2Transfers to Bank of Brasil Account
from Yokohama Specie Bank Account
in New York
Date

January 20
21
23

24
25

February 5
5

28
28

March 11

April 21
21

Amount

1,000,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
850,000
900,000

1,000,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000

Transferred on
books of
Guaranty
Chase

Guaranty
Chase

Guaranty
Chase

Guaranty

National City

Chase National
Guaranty Trust

National City
Guaranty

$15,000,000

Less transfer from Bank of

Brazil account - February 21 - 2,000,000

National City

$13,000,000

The completeness of these figures is demonstrated by the fact that they
agree in almost every detail with the information contained in the various
State Department cables from Rio de Janeiro. The cable of January 30 stated
that the balances of the Yokohama Specie Bank at the Bank of Brazil then
amounted to $5,000,000. It can be seen from the above figures that the transfere between January 20 and 25. 1941 totaled exactly $5,000,000. Furthermore,
the balances, as of March 7. reported in the cable of March 13, were given as
$5,500,000. The transfers reported by Chase, Guaranty, and National City
through this period aggregated $10,000,000. After allowance is made for a
withdrawal of $5,000,000, mentioned in the cable of February 22, our figures
would indicate a balance of $5,000,000. As to the $5,000,000 withdrawal,
$2,000,000 can be explained by the transfer on February 21 to Yokohama Specie
Bank account from the Bank of Brazil account. This payment apparently represented the settlement of a one month future contract made by the Yokohama Specie
Bank in a swap transaction with the Bank of Brazil on January 21, mentioned in
the cable of the following day (No. 45).
The foregoing emphasizes the importance of the daily reports on debits
and credits we are now receiving. A net amount of $10,000,000 was transferred
to Brazilian account between December 31, 1940 and March 11, 1941. or prior

to the inauguration of the daily reports on debits and credits. During this

period, our weekly reports from the Yokohama Specie Bank indicated a reduction

of $24,000,000 in Japan's net dollar assets held at the New York Agency. In
view of the numerous reports in the State Department cables that Japan had

69

-3
transferred funds to Brasil, we made inquiry with the Yokohana Specie Bank
every week in which there was an unexplained reduction in their reported net

dollar assets due to Japan. At no time, however, did the bank indicate directly
that this represented a withdrawal of funds to Brasil. For example, the Yokohama Specie's reports for the week ended March 5 indicated a reduction of

$5,800,000 in Japan's net dollar absets. In reply to Mr. McKeon's inquiry, the

bank indicated that these funds were used for commitments in this country.
From the reports from Chase, Guaranty, and National City, we now know that at
least $3,000,000 of this amount represented transfers to Bank of Brasil account,
$1,500,000 being on the books of National City and $1,500,000 on the books of
Chase.

Init.: JWMCK
JVMcK:WHR:EC

copy:lap:5/10/41

Copy of Letter from G, Monterrey, Mexico,

70

May 5,1941

.40 situation with respect to labor is most confusing, It is

believed by almost every one that Avila Camacho really desires a
change ut has his hands pretty well tied and does not have enough

ini to shake off the shackles. Cardenas still seems to be

the power behind the throne and does not want any of his work undone.
Cardenas has the support of the agrarians and the labor unions.
Garoia Tellez is his henchman in the Cabinet and seems to have more
influence with Avila Camacho than other more able and conservative
members. It has been rumored that Garoia Tellez would leave the
Cabinet. The rumors are heard every month or so but Garcia Tellez

is still there. It is now also pretty well known that Avila Camacho
has had several secret meetings with Cardenas. The latter is, I

think, also somewhat of an obstacle to reaching a better understanding

with Washington.

A Mexican friend of mine recently told me that he was alarmed
by the rapidly growing pro-axis sentiment in Mexico. He said he
thought this was due in part to the continued successes of Hitler
and Britain's apparent inability to stop him and also Lindbergh's
statements that England could not win even with United States help.
I heard that Hans Cram, who is now Nazi Consul at Monterrey,
recently made a speech at a dinner at which he put forth the argument

that Mexico would be much better off if the axis won in that it

could then purchase goods to much better advantage than from the

United States. I understand that, while there were some dissenters,
the speech was in general well received. In any event, it was good
propaganda.

reer e YAM
to aoisivia

TH THE COMPLIMENTS
OF

HAROLD K HOCHSCHILD

71
C

0

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Y

WASHINGTON

In reply refer to
Eu 856.5151/113

May 5, 1941

The Secretary of State presents his compliments to
the Honorable the Secretary of the Treasury and encloses

for the information of the latter a copy of a telegram,
no. 1017 of March 19, 1941, from the American Embassy

at Berlin relative to a Netherlands decree of February 25,
1941, requiring residents of the Netherlands to report
foreign claims and valuables.

Enclosure:

From Embassy at Berlin
March 19, 1941

72
TELEGRAM RECEIVED

From BERLIN
Dated March 19, 1941
Rec'd 11:43 a.m.

Secretary of State,
Washington.

1017, March 19, noon.

Consulate General at Amsterdam reports that decree

no. 35 of February 25, 1941 issued by the Secretary
General of the Department of Finance requires all

residents of the Netherlands to report in writing not
later than March 15, 1941 all foreign claims and valuables of more than 100 guilders other than stock and

bonds and certain minor items that were in their possession or for which they acted as trustee on March 1,

1941 (in this connection please see similar order in
Germany reported in Embassy's telegram no. 193 of March 23,

1939). Full text will be submitted by despatch by Consulate General at Amsterdam. Inform Treasury.

Copy:bj 5-7-41

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Principal Holders on March 31, 1941 of the 3-1/4 Percent Treasury Bonds
Maturing on August 1, 1941

(Dollar figures are millions)
: Percent of

Amount
:

Amount outstanding March 31, 1941

total

$834.5

Principal Holders on March 31, 1941 classified by:

1. The size of their holdings:
a. 50 banks and insurance companies holding more than

$2 millions of the issue (see list attached)

51.2
21.3

d. All other investors

$427.4
177.9
57.0
172.2

Total

$834.5

100.0

45.7
9.4
17.4

e. All other investors

$381.3
78.9
145.1
57.0
172.2

20.7

Total

$834.5

100.0

b. 1,196 other banks and insurance companies
c. 12 Federal Reserve banks

6.8

20.7

2. The type of institution reporting:
a. 908 commercial banks
b. 155 mutual savings banks
C. 183 insurance companies
d. 12 Federal Reserve banks

Office of the Secretary of the Treasury, Division of Research and Statistics.

6.8

May 5. 1941.

Note: The information shown above is based upon data submitted by 6,900 banks and insurance companies.

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
74

Fifty Largest Bank and Insurance
Company Holders of the 3-1/4's of 1941
March 31, 1941

(In millions of dollars)
:

1. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York

2. The Travelers Insurance Co. of Hartford
3. First National Bank, Baltimore
4. National City Bank, New York
5. Bank of New York

6. National Bank of Detroit
7. Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S., New York

8. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., New York
9. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., New York
10. Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
11. Bank for Savings in the City of New York
12. American Trust Co., San Francisco
13. The Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Newark
14. Savings Bank Trust Co., New York
15. New York Trust Company

16. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York
17. Troy Savings Bank, Troy New York
.8. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., New York
19. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co., Philadelphia
20. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co., Philadelphia
21. Bank of the Manhattan Co., New York
22. First National Bank, New York
23. National City Bank, Cleveland
24. Wilmington Trust Co., Wilmington
25. Toledo Trust Co., Toledo
26. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co., Boston
27. First National Bank, Palm Beach, Florida
28. Baltimore National Bank, Baltimore
29. Bankers Trust Co., New York
30. North River Savings Bank, New York
31. Mellon National Bank, Pittsburgh, Pa.
32. Lawyers Trust Co., New York
33. City Trust & Savings Bank, Youngstown, Ohio
34. John Hancock Life Insurance Co., Boston
35. First National Bank, Boston
36. Strafford Savings Bank, Dover, N. H.
37. Empire Trust Co., New York
38. Franklin Savings Bank in the City of New York
39. Greenwich Savings Bank, New York

40. Liberty Bank of Buffalo

:

Name

Amount

58.0
40.0
35.0
25.0
23.4
21.7
20.7
14.0
12.5
12.4

10.0
9.0
8.0
8.0
7.6
7.5
6.0
5.1
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.3

4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6

2.5

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
75
Fifty Largest Bank and Insurance Company

Holders of the 3-1/4's of 1941 - Continued

(In millions of dollars)
:

41. Union Dime Savings Bank, New York

:

Name

Amount

49. First National Bank, Lincoln, Nebraska

2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.2

50. East New York Savings Bank, Brooklyn

2.1

42. United States Trust Co. of New York
43. Flatbush Savings Bank, Brooklyn

44. American Automobile Insurance Co., St. Louis, Mo.

45. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford
46. The Merrill Trust Co., Bangor, Maine

47. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., New York
48. Washington Mutual Savings Bank, Seattle

Total

Office of the Secretary of the Treasury,
Division of Research and Statistics.

427.4

May 1, 1941.

Treasury Department

Division of Monetary Research
Date
To:

From:

76

May 5,

1941

Secretary Morgenthau
H. D. White

Highlights of Canadian Budget Proposals
for 1941-42.

1. Increase in tax revenues during the fiscal
year 1941-42- roughly to match increase in expenditures. The deficit is estimated at $330
to $465 million (U.S.). New and higher taxes
are expected to account for $250 million of
the anticipated $500 million increase in tax
receipts.
2. The Dominion to take over, for the duration of
the war, the provincial fields of personal and

corporate income tax and to impose gasoline
and succession duties. The provinces are to be
compensated for the resultant loss in revenue.
3. The minimum personal income tax rate to be raised from 6 to 15% the minimum corporate income
tax from 30 to 40% and the National Defense
Tax, collected at the source on wages and salaries, from 2 and 3% to 5 and 7%.
4. Building construction for industrial and commercial uses and installation of machinery and
equipment to be licensed. This will have a two
fold effect of expanding the market for Government bonds and reducing the demand for goods

and services essential to the war effort.
5. Duties on a large variety of imports from Great
Britain to be reduced. Canada has assured

Great Britain it will finance the UK deficit
of Canadian dollars.

6. No relaxation of restrictions on Canadian travel in U. S.
MR. COE

Branch 2061 - 210

77

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE May 5, 1941
TO

Mr. White

FROM

Miss Kistler

Subject:

Canadian Budget, 1941-42

1. The Canadian Government estimates that the Dominion deficit during

the fiscal year 1941-42 will be little, if any, higher than it was during
the year 1940-41.
1939-40

(actual)

1940-41

(Preliminary)

1941-42

(Estimated)

(millions - U.S.)
Expenditures
Revenues

Deficit

$645

$1,140

$1,590 to $1,725

535

785

1,260

$110

$ 355

$ 330 to $ 465

2. The $500 million rise in tax revenues to match the anticipated increase in expenditures is in line with the government's "pay as you go as far
as practicable" policy, announced at the outbreak of the war. On the basis
of the above estimates, 73 to 79 percent of the Dominion's expenditures will
be met out of taxes.

3. The deficit for the fiscal year 1940-41 is $200 million smaller than

it was originally estimated it would be. Expenditures were somewhat less than
anticipated, while tax receipts were substantially larger than expected.

4. The principal proposed changes in the tax structure are:
(a) An increase in the personal income tax rate from 6 to 8
percent to 15 percent on the first $1,000 of taxable income with 5 percent increase on each additional $1,000.
Present exemptions of $750 for single person, $1,500 for
married couple, and $400 for each dependent remains unchanged.

(b) A 10 percent increase in the excess profits tax, making
the minimum corporation tax 40 percent.

78

-2-

Division of Monetary
Research

(c) An increase in the national defense tax, which is
collected at the source on wages and salaries, from
2 and 3 percent to 5 and 7 percent. The exemption
for a single person is $660 a year.

(d) Imposition of new and higher excise taxes on a wide
variety of commodities.

(e) Reduction in duties on large variety of imports from
Great Britain.
These changes are expected to produce $225 million this year

and $270 million in a full fiscal year.

This increased tax burden will bear most heavily upon persons
in moderate circumstances, those with incomes from $700 to $25,000.

However, for the first time in Canadian history, revenues from direct taxes will be greater than receipts from excise and sales taxes.
5. The Dominion proposes to take over, for the duration of the
war, the provincial fields of personal and corporation income tax and
to impose gasoline and succession duties. In return for vacating the
income tax field, the Dominion will pay the provinces either
(a) An amount equal to the revenues which the provinces,

along with their municipalities, actually obtained

from income taxes during the fiscal year ending nearest to December 31, 1941, or

(b) The cost of the net debt service actually paid by the
provinces during the fiscal year less the revenues obtained from succession duties during that period.
Such payments are to be augmented, where necessary, by appropriate

fiscal-need subsidies.

Furthermore, in order to assist those provinces which agree to
vacate these two fields, the Dominion will guarantee to them an
amount equivalent to the revenues which they actually received from

gasoline taxes during the last fiscal year, provided they do not
change their present gasoline tax rates.

6. Of the $1.6 billion of budgeted expenditures for the fiscal
1941-42, $1,170 million are to finance the war effort, the
year, cost of which may be as much as $150 million higher than the budgeted war

figure. During the first quarter of 1941, Canadian Government
expenditures were five times as high as during the same period a year

79
-3-

Division of Monetary
Research

earlier and were at the rate of more than $900 million (U.S.) annually.

Roughly one-third of the non-war expenditures are to defray the carrying
costs of the Dominion debt.
7. The Dominion Government has assured Great Britain that Canada

would finance that proportion of the British deficit of Canadian dollars
which Britain herself could not meet through the transfer of gold or
U. S. dollars. Britain's deficit of Canadian dollars is expected to
reach $1 billion (U. 3.) for the year. This, together with the direct
war effort, brings the total Canadian expenditures on war account, direct and indirect, to $2,170 to $2,300 million (U. S.). This represents
41 to 43 percent of the estimated national income.

8. The Finance Minister estimates the Dominion Government will
have to borrow $720 to $850 million (U. S.) during the fiscal year.
Increase in open and trust accounts are expected to provide another
$180 million (U. S.).

9. In order to expand the market for government bonds and limit
the demand for goods and services essential to the war effort, Canada is
soon to embark on a policy of controlling investments. Mr. Ilsley announced
that an order-in-council is soon to be passed which will require a license
for all building construction for commercial or industrial use and for the
installation of machinery or equipment. However, since replacements,
small extensions, housing accomodations, and plant and equipment for primary industries are to be exempt, the effect of the order will be limited
to consumption and luxury goods industries.

10. The net debt of the Dominion Government on March 31, 1941 stood

at $3,300 billion (U. s.), an increase of $355 million during the year.

The gross debt of the Dominion on March 31 was $4,270 million (U. s.),
against which the government held assets of $970 million.

11. Mr. Ilsley warned that the Hyde Park declaration, although "a
magnificant contribution" could not lead up to a restoration of the Cana-

dian dollar to parity with the U. S. dollar nor a relaxation of present
restrictions on Canadian travel in U. S.

(Source: Mr. Ilsley's Budget Speech of April 29, 1941.)

COPY

80
BRITISH EMBASSY,
WASHINGTON, D.C.

5th May, 1941.

Dear Mr. Secretary,

As you may know, one of General Wavell's prin-

cipal staff officers, Brigadier Whiteley, is here,
and has I think been giving your people some account of

how General Wavell sees the picture in North Africa, etc.

It occurred to me that it might possibly interest
you to see him before he goes back, which he will be

doing very shortly, and if so, perhaps you would let me
have a message as early as you could, and I would tell
him to place himself in communication with your Secretary.
I am,

Mr. Secretary,
Yours sincerely,

/s/Halifax

The Honourable Henry Morgenthau, Junior,

Secretary of the Treasury.

81

MEMORANDUM

May 5, 1941

To:

Secretary Morgenthan

From: Oscar Cox

Subject: Department of Supply
I.

Functions

An adequate and effective Department of Supply

should doubtless have the following functions:
a) Manufacture

Jurisdiction over the arsenals and Government

shipyards should be in the Department of Supply.

The specifications for guns, ships, etc. can be
prepared by the users of them - the Army and

Navy - or they can participate in their formulation.
To a degree this is what is done now in the Army
and Navy. Thus, for example, Ordnance collaborates

with Infantry in the design and manufacture of
infantry equipment.

Army and Navy officers skilled in the
manufacture of guns and ships could be detailed
to the Department of Supply to work in the arsenals
or shipyards.

82
-2b) Procurement

Coordination of procurement under one

centralised purchasing agency has its obvious
advantages. Many of the defense articles used
by the Army and Navy are the same and should

doubtless be purchased at the same time. Many
more which are not now the same could doubtless

be standardised through a central Department of
Supply.

c) Production Expansion

In the past few years, particularly, there have
been many instances where uncoordinated plant expansion

for Army and Navy material has taken place. If this
expansion had been properly tied together greater
speed and efficiency would unquestionably have

resulted. Today, funds for the expansion of plant
facilities are available to the War and Navy Departments,
to the RFC, Maritime Commission and the Lend-Lease

appropriation. In many instances these funds are
available for the same or similar purposes. They can
most effectively be used through a central source.
d) Storage

Department of Supply storage depots at key spots

would doubtless be more efficient than the present
methods of storage.

83

-3e) Priorities
A Department of Supply should obviously have the

power to determine priorities between civilian consumers
as well as between the Government and others. It should

also be the central source to exercise priorities in

transportation by rail, air, ship, etc.
f) Price Control

In addition to the control over prices which a
Department of Supply can exercise by its powers to
expand the supply of any article and through cumulating

and timing its purchasing, it should also have the power

to control prices through the fixing of ceilings, etc.
g) Requisitioning
Upon the payment of just compensation, the Department

of Supply should be empowered to requisition any plant,

facility or article useful for defense. This is a much
needed power which does not exist now.

II.
Legislation To Create Central
Supply Agencies

The following two methods are suggested as possible

ways of creating a central supply agency:

1) A modified version of the Overman Act. A

first draft is annexed.

84

2) A bill creating a cabinet Department of Supply.

I - preparing a draft of such a bill.

lot

85

An Act Authorising the President to coordinate or consolidate
executive bureaus, agencies, and offices, and for other purposes, in
the interest of economy and the more efficient concentration of the
Government.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the national
security and defense, for the support and maintenance of the Army and

Navy, for the better utilisation of resources and industries, and for
the more effective exercise and more efficient administration by the
President of his powers as Commander in Chief of the land and naval
forces the President is hereby authorized to make such redistribution
of functions among executive agencies as he may deem necessary, including any functions, duties, and powers hitherto by law conferred
upon any executive department, commission, bureau, agency, office, or

officer, in such manner as in his judgment shall seem best fitted to
carry out the purposes of this Act, and to this end is authorised to

make such regulations and to issue such orders as he may deem neces-

sary, which regulations and orders shall be in writing and shall be
filed with the head of the department affected and constitute a public record: Provided, That this Act shall remain in force during the
continuance of the present emergency and for six months after the termination of the emergency, or at such earlier time as the President
may designate: Provided further, That the termination of this Act
shall not affect any act done or any right or obligation accruing or
accrued pursuant to this Act and during the time that this Act is in
force: Provided further, That the authority by this Act granted shall
be exercised only in matters relating to the furtherance of the defense
program.

SEC. 2. That in carrying out the purposes of this Act the President
is authorize to utilize, coordinate, or consolidate any executive or
administrative commissions, bureaus, agencies, offices, or officers now
existing by law, to transfer any duties or powers from one existing department, commission, bureau, agency, office, or officer to another, to

transfer the personnel thereof or any part of it either by detail or

assignment, together with the whole or any part of the records and public property belonging thereto.

SEC. 3. That for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of
this Act, any moneys heretofore and hereafter appropriated for the use
of any executive department, commission, bureau, agency, office, or
officer shall be expended only for the purposes for which it was appropriated under the direction of such other agency as may be directed by
the President hereunder to perform and execute said function.

86

-2SEC. 4. That all laws or parts of laws conflicting with the provisions of this Act are to the extent of such conflict suspended while
this Act is in force.

87

MAY 5- 1941

Mr. Philip Young

Maintstration

Federal Reserve Building
Washington, D. C.
Sirs

Referring to your letter of April 25, 1941,

transmitting a specimen engy of Form LLL-3 (Hea

tion on Requisition for Defense Articles Under the Act
of March 11, 1941) and instructions for using mash forms,
you are hereby advised that the following officials of
the Procurement Division have been authorised, respectively,
to execute and approve such documents:

Goo. Landiek, Jr., Assistant to the Director
Reynond Eberly, Chief of Control - Land-Lease

Cliften E. Mack, Director of Procurement
Robt. LeFove, Assistant Director of Procurement.

Very truly yours,
(Signed) H. Morgenthau, Jr.

Segretary of the Treasury

88

MAY 5- 1941

ORDER
Effective immediately, Goo. Landick, Jr.,
Assistant to the Director, Precurement Division, and Raymond Eberly, Chief of Control Land-Lease, are empowered and authorised to

sign requests for funds and reconsendations

on requisitions for defense articles under
the Ast of March 11, 1941, and Clifton E. Nack,
Director of Precurement, and Rebt. LeFovre,

Assistant Director of Presurement, are autharised and expensed to sign such requisitioning documents as approving officers.

(Signed) H. Morgenthan, Jr.

Secretary of the Treasury

89

MAY 5-1941

ORDER
Effective immediately, Goo. Landick, Jr.,
Assistant to the Director, Presurement Division, and Raymond Eberly, Chief of Control Lend-Lease, are empowered and authorised to

sign requests for funds and recommendations

on requisitions for defense articles under
the Act of March 11, 1941, and Clifton E. Mack,
Director of Precurement, and Rebt. LeFevre,

Assistant Director of Presurement, are autherised and empowered to sign such requisitioning documents as approving officers.

(Signed) H. Morgenthau, Jr.

Secretary of the Treasury

90

MEMORANDUM

To:

Mr. Harry L. Hopkins

From:

Philip Young and Oscar Cox

Subject:

Coordination of Plant Expansion

Funds for the same kind of plant expansion and facilities
are now available to the War and Navy Departments, RFC and Lend-Lease.

There is a need to tie these together in a coordinated form
so that they can be put to their most effective use.

We shall, if you wish, prepare a preliminary study on this
subject to point up the problems and policy questions which are
involved.

(Initialed) P.I. O.S.C.

OSC:1wb

5/5/41

91

THE GEORGE MASON

Alexandria, Va.

Dear Mr. Cox:

Even if you can't get my pet ex-legionaries
out of Morocco - you might suggest to the right person

that it is not to American interests that the Oran-Dakar
railroad be built until we know whether it will be used
by the Germans. Our help in feeding North Africa might

be on condition that work on the railroad stop.
Then at least my poor slaves will not have
to work so hard all through the summer heat. As I said,
without shoes, or socks, or shirts - in their heavy Army
uniforms.

Yours truly

(signed) Cora Goold

92

MEMORANDUM

May 5, 1941

To:

Mr. Hopkins

From:

Oscar Cox

Subject:

Merchant Shipping

I understand that the Candians are using some

"lady boats" on the West Indies run. My understanding is

that several of these boats are refrigerated and could doubtless

be effectively used in the North Atlantic run. In terms of the
present need it might be desirable to exert some pressure on

the British to get these boats into the North Atlantic run and
if necessary to substitute other boats which cannot as effectively
be used in going to England.
(Signed) Cox

OSC:1wb

5/5/41

93
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 5, 1941
Secretary Morgenthau
FROM Mr. Cochran

CONFIDENTIAL

Registered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follows:
Sold to commercial concerns
£57,000
Purchased from commercial concerns £34,000

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York sold £10,000 in registered sterling to

the American Express Company.

Open market sterling held steady at 4.03-1/4. Transactions of the reporting

banks were as follows:

Sold to commercial concerns
Purchased from commercial concerns

£11,000

£ 6,000

The Argentine free peso underwent a slight improvement. The closing quotation
was 2360, as compared with Saturday's final rate of .2355.
The Cuban peso advanced to 3-13/16% discount as against 3-15/16% on Saturday.

In New
as follows:

York, closing quotations for the foreign currencies listed below were
Canadian dollar
Swiss franc
Swedish krona
Reichsmark

Lira

Brazilian milreis (free)
Mexican peso

12-1/2% discount
.2321

.2386
.4005
.0505
.0505
.2066

In Shanghai, the yuan in terms of our currency advanced 1/32 to 5-3/16
Sterling was quoted at 3.86-3/4, a slight gain.
There were no gold transactions consummated by us today.

The State Department forwarded a cable to us stating that the following gold
shipments had been made from Australia, for sale to the San Francisco Mint:
$4,055,000
shipped
by the
Commonwealth
Bank of Australia, Sydney, to the Federal
Reserve
Bank
of San
Francisco.
135,000Company,
shipped San-Francisco.
by the Bank of New South Wales, Sydney, to the American Trust

$4,190,000 Total

94

-2-

The price fixed in London for both spot and forward silver was again 23-1/24,
equivalent to 42.67d

The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver was unchanged at 35t. Handy
and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver was also unchanged at 34-3/44.
We made four purchases of silver totaling 375,000 ounces under the Silver
Purchase Act, all of which was bought for forward delivery. This silver represented

new production, of which 200,000 ounces came from Peru, and 175,000 ounces from
various foreign countries.

The Federal Reserve Bank's report of April 30, listing deposits of banks in
Asia with the New York agencies of Japanese banks, showed that such deposits totaled

$78,139,000, a decline of $7,006,000 since April 23. Most of the change in deposits
took place on the books of the Yokohama Specie Bank's New York agency. The latter's

principal dollar liabilities to and dollar claims on Japanese banks in Asia stood as

follows on April 30:

April 30
Liabilities: Deposits for Japan and Manchuria
Deposits for China
: U.S.Treas.Bills, comm. paper, etc.
aims

: Loans

: Other - mainly Jap. import bills

$50,525,000
20,185,000
25,719,000
$40,511,000
6,117,000

Change from

April 23

- $6,608,000

+ 505,000

+ 2,204,000
- $5,237,000

- 588,000

The last three categories refer primarily to banks in Japan and Manchuria. The net
withdrawal of $6,608,000 from deposits held for such banks, it will be observed, was
accompanied by a reduction of $5,237,000 in Agency loans, as well as a gain of more
than $2,200,000 in Treasury bills, etc. held by the Agency for banks in Asia.

AMP
CONTIDENTIAL -

95

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

CONFIDENTIAL

DATE May 5, 1941

Secretary Morgenthau

TO

CA

FROM

Mr. Haa's

Subject:

The Business Situation,

Week ending May 3, 1941.
Summary

(1) Preliminary estimates from the Federal Reserve Board

indicate that the FRB index will decline 4 or 5 points in
April from the level of 143 reported for March. Reductions

in automobile and bituminous coal components due to strikes
were primarily responsible for the drop in the combined index.

(2) A major readjustment of the transportation services
of the United States may be expected from the plan to allocate
2 million tons of merchant ships to British aid, which will

put a real strain on railroad facilities. The railroads

have announced an intention to purchase 270,000 new freight

cars to meet increased needs in 1942 and 1943, but the ability
to produce this quantity of cars in the time mentioned is

questionable.

(3) Commodity prices advanced on the ship allocation announcement. Increases were most pronounced in prices of commodities which may be purchased for Britain, and which may
developof
shortages
if ships rose
are diverted
customary
Prices
farm products
sharplyfrom
at the
end of routes.
the week

on Senate loans.
committee
Government

approval of an 85 percent parity basis for

(4) Although a large proportion of the blast furnaces

which were banked during the coal strike have been returned
to operation, it may take 2 weeks or more before steel opera- week

tions are back to the pre-strike level. Operations this

are scheduled
at 96.8 percent of capacity compared with 94.3
percent
last week.

96
2-

FRB index lower for April
The Federal Reserve Board estimates that the decline of
production in April will amount to as much as 4 or 5 points
on the adjusted FRB index of industrial production, which
stood at 143 in March. Reductions in the production of automobiles and bituminous coal, due to strikes, more than offset
the action of other components which, for the most part,
either increased or maintained the high March level.

Steel production also declined somewhat in April, partly
because of a temporary shutdown of Ford steel mills during
the Ford strike, and partly because of coal shortages.
Anthracite production showed a substantial contra-seasonal
decline, with warm weather and delay in issuing spring prices
the primary factors.

Merchant shipping pool will necessitate
readjustment of transportation services
A major readjustment of the transportation services of
the United States may be expected as the result of last

week's announcement by the Maritime Commission that a pool

of 2 million tons of merchant ships, one-fifth of all the
ships under United States registry, will be created to aid
the British. Immediate increases in the volume of railway
freight are sure to result, since a large part of the ships
taken will undoubtedly be chosen from lake and inter-coastal
routes for which alternate rail routes are available.
Coincident with this development, the railroads have
come to a sudden realization that acute shortages in railway
facilities may be in prospect. The Association of American
Railroads has advised its members to acquire no less than
120,000 freight cars to meet 1942 traffic requirements, and
150,000 more cars to cover 1943 needs. These figures contrast sharply with the 65,000 freight cars ordered in 1940,
and would involve the largest volume of freight car orders
since 1924. In view of the large volume of armament business booked, and difficulties in obtaining steel and other
materials, it remains to be seen whether the equipment manufacturers can cope with the heavy buying program now being
recommended.

During the first 4 months of 1941, new freight car orders
have been running far ahead of the corresponding months of 1940.
(See Chart 1, lower section.) Even this increased rate of
ordering would have to be almost fully maintained throughout

97
3a 12 month period to amount to the estimated 120,000 add1tional cars needed for 1942, and then orders would have to
be stepped up 15 percent to meet 1943 requirements. More-

over, even if this enlarged program can be carried out,
equipment requirements for the current year are of more
immediate concern. It now seems even more likely that
previously-expressed fears of a car shortage will be con-

firmed before the fall traffic peak is passed.

Railroad earnings up sharply in March

In addition to the increasing awareness of the heavy requirements of the defense program, railroad equipment buying
is being facilitated by the improved earnings position of the
railroads. Net railway operating income figures for March
reveal a rise of 38 percent above the previous month and a
gain of no less than 118 percent over March 1940. (See
Chart 1, middle section.)

While part of the high earnings in March was due to

heavy coal traffic in anticipation of the strike, numerous
other factors have contributed to the improvement in railroad earnings in recent months. As a result, railway net
operating income for the first quarter of this year ran
74 percent above the corresponding period of 1940. Earnings
undoubtedly declined last month, due to the drop in freight
carloadings resulting from the coal strike, (see Chart 1,
upper section), but barring unforeseen developments a sharp
recovery in traffic and earnings will probably occur in the
current month.

No evidence that freight is piling up awaiting export
Some difference of opihion is reported in the press as
to whether goods for export are piling up in United States
ports. While one statement that goods for export are accumulating on wharves is said to refer to iron and steel for
Britain, shipping interests deny that there is any considerable backlog of goods in ports awaiting shipment to England.
In view of the present close control over freight congestion
in railroad yards, it is probable that excess freight awaiting export would partly be held back at the plants.
Our figures for lighterage freight in storage and on
hand for unloading in New York harbor show no tendency for
freight awaiting export to accumulate recently. Indeed,
there was a steady falling off during April from the high
level reached in March. (See Chart 2.)

98
4

The outward movement of export freight from New York
(see Chart 3, upper section) has shown some improvement,

and is currently running at a slightly higher level than
receipts of freight for export at that port (lower section
of chart). Receipts of freight for export at 9 other North
Atlantic ports, however, showed a noticeable decline during
April, perhaps indicating that shipments to these ports
have been held back because of a lack of ships.

Freight congestion at Pacific ports
According to press statements, Pacific ports have developed some congestion recently, unlike the relatively
uncrowded conditions of Atlantic ports. Contributing factors
in the reported congestion are (1) the fact that 13 terminals
have been taken over by the Army and Navy, and (2) the fact
that an increasing number of vessels on Far East routes are
terminating their voyage on the West Coast. To alleviate

the situation, Pacific Coast port authorities will meet at

San Francisco on May 8 to consider reduction of free storage
time allowed on piers.
From data recently compiled by the Association of American
Railroads, we have computed the volume of freight receipts

for export at the 6 main Pacific ports, covering the period
since the week ended February 15, 1941. (Refer to Chart 3,
lower section.) The ports included are Seattle, Tacoma,
Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. From

the low of 579 cars for the last week in February, the receipts have increased to 1,301 cars in the week ended April 12,
and 1,085 cars in the week ended April 26, the latest date
available.

Record aircraft shipments feature March export gain

Featured by a sharp rise in aircraft shipments, exports

of United States merchandise in March rose more than season-

ally to the highest levels since January 1940. The monthly
total of nearly $351,000,000 was 18 percent above the previ-

ous month and 2 percent above March 1940.

Aircraft exports in March amounted to $50,000,000, the
highest monthly figure on record and $16,000,000 above the

previous month. (See Chart 4.) Reflecting in part the
longer month and the effects of the enactment of the lendlease act, nearly all major groups of non-agricultural ex-

ports in March showed gains over the previous month. Never-

theless, copper exports declined further, and iron and steel
scrap shipments receded to a figure only slightly above the
low touched in January.

99

-5 Although iron and steel exports rose moderately above

the total for the previous short month; they were still
26 percent below the high reached last August. As is evident
Chart 4, a rather steady downward drift in steel

progress of

has from been in since that time. Shipments firearms exports
and ammunition, on the other hand, rose 11 percent above the

February total to $14,000,000 as compared with only a little
over $1,000,000 in March 1940.

Agricultural exports continued at very low levels and
amounted to only 8 percent of total exports, despite a gain
of $5,000,000 over the previous month. Cotton shipments to
foreign markets rose noticeably but the total was still far
below the March 1940 figure.

Steel industry strives to offset effects of coal strike
The end of last week found steel companies striving hard

to get back into full production following the settlement of
the coal strike. By this week, at least 5 of the 9 closed

blast furnaces in the Youngstown district are expected to be
back into production, and the Carnegie-Illino1s Steel Corporation alone has already resumed operations at 6 closed blast
furnaces in the Chicago and Pittsburgh districts. However,
it is believed that two weeks or more will be required to
get steel operations back to the levels prevailing before
the strike. A week to ten days from the resumption of operations will be needed to get beehive coke moving to blast
furnaces.

In addition to greatly aggravating the previous tight
situation in coke and pig iron, the strike has reportedly
forced steel plants to cut heavily into reserve stocks of
cold ingots, billets and slabs. Had it not been for an in-

creased use of steel scrap, steel production would doubtless
have declined even further. Steel operations last week were
scheduled at 94.3 percent of capacity as compared with 99.2
percent just before the coal strike occurred. Operations
during the current week are scheduled at 96.8 percent of
capacity.

Government control over iron and steel products tightened

New steel business booked by mills in April appears to

have equalled or even exceeded the record-breaking volume of

March. New orders received by the U. S. Steel Corporation
during the week ended April 24, though somewhat lower than
in the previous week, amounted to no less than 163 percent
of capacity.

100

-6In a move intended to prevent overbuying for unneces-

sary inventories, iron and steel products were included in
an inventory control order issued last week by the OPM, in-

itiating a new phase of the priorities system. In addition,
copper, lead, tin, and all ferrous and non-ferrous alloys

were included.

New orders remain at high level
Our new orders index (1936 = 100) declined to 198.8 in
the week ended April 26 from 212.3 in the previous week.

(See Chart 5.) The decline arises entirely from a drop in
new orders for steel; the components for textiles and total
excluding steel and textiles both increased very slightly.
Shipping pool announcement lifts commodity prices

The announcement by the Maritime Commission that a pool

will be created to provide additional shipping space for aid
to Britain had a pronounced bullish effect on commodity

prices at the end of last week, particularly for imported

commodities. On Saturday, the prices of domestic farm products were lifted sharply when the Senate Agriculture

Committee accepted an 85 percent parity basis for Government

crop loans. Price indexes of both imported and domestic
commodities increased for the week (see Chart 6, upper sec-

tion) while the Dow-Jones index of futures prices for the

first time exceeded its December 1939 peak.

The announcement of the shipping pool had some bullish
influence on domestic products, such as cottonseed oil and
lard, purchases of which may be expected to increase if more

space 18 available for shipment to Britain. (See Chart 6.
lower section.) On imported commodities the influence of
the announcement was distinctly bullish, as it raised fears

of greater shortages. On commodities deemed "essential",
however, including rubber and tin and perhaps some others,
the trade has been given to understand that the new order
may release space for quantities considered necessary.

Following the recent announcement that, beginning with
May-June sailings, Dutch vessels from the Far East will
land their cargoes at Pacific Coast ports, an announcement
has now been received that the freight rate on rubber shipments to the Pacific Coast will be reduced from $27 to $23

per ton. The tin rate may also be reduced. A further
possible step is suggested by the ship warrant system outlined
in the Bland bill (H. R. 4583) which would give the Maritime
Commission far-reaching control over freight rates and space
allocation on both foreign and American ships.

101

-7New highs for the season were recorded on Saturday

by futures prices of various domestic staples, including
wheat, cotton, cottonseed oil, and lard, because of the action of the Senate Agriculture Committee. Wheat futures
gained 2 to 3 cents in one day.
Prices of cotton textiles increased 24 percent in year
To provide a longer perspective on price movements of
the major commodity groups, we have prepared a chart (see
Chart 7) showing the percentage change in the BLS price index
for each group from April 1940 to the week ended April 26,

1941, the latest week available. This period is selected to

correct for seasonal influences on prices of farm products.
Among the ten major groups, as shown on the chart, textile products have made the greatest advance. Prices for
this group have increased considerably more than for other
groups important in the defense program, such as building
materials, chemicals, or metals and metal products.

Cotton goods have shown the most important price increase

among the textile materials, the average price for this subgroup having risen 23. 6 percent since April 1940 as compared
with an increase of 10.7 percent for the combined textile
index. Prices of woolen goods, for comparison, show an average increase of only 10.0 percent, despite earlier shortages
in supplies of raw wool. The prices for rayon are unchanged,
while "other textiles" (including burlap and jute) have increased 20.2 percent.

In view of the current record level of mill consumption
of raw cotton, and the relative increases in the prices of
cotton textiles, it is strange that no changes have been

made in the Department of Agriculture's surplus disposal
programs, which include subsidy payments on exports of cotton
products as well as subsidies under the mattress, stamp plan,

cotton bagging for cotton bales, and cotton insulating programs. According to the Bureau of Agricultural Economics,
most of these programs have been expanded this year so that
"their effect on cotton consumption will probably be greater
this season than last. = At a meeting last week with cotton
spinners, Price Administrator Leon Henderson warned that
the combed cotton yarn industry would either have to

eliminate
"fictitious" prices or be faced with a ceiling
schedule.

-8Weekly business indexes

Due largely to gains in paperboard production and
electric power output, the New York Times index of business
activity for the week ended April 26 rose 1.8 to 120.4, and
thus retraced some of the ground lost in the preceding three

weeks.

In addition to the components above-mentioned, automo-

bile production, cotton mill activity and miscellaneous
freight carloadings also contributed to the rise in the combined index. The principal offsetting factor was a drop in
steel ingot production resulting from the coal strike.
Lumber production declined contra-seasonally and "all other"
freight carloadings rose slightly less than seasonally.
Barron's index of business activity during the week
ended April 26 ran counter to the Times index and declined
to 130.4 from 130.7 in the previous week.
Preliminary data for the week ended May 3 reveal a

further moderate decline in the adjusted index of steel
ingot production. On the other hand, the adjusted index of
automobile production for the same period will show a sharp
advance, due to the stepping up of production at the Ford

plants.

102

Chart 1

103
RAILROAD SITUATION
MA.

FEB.

JAN.

APR.

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUR.

SPT.

961.

NOV,

DEE.
CARE

CARS

THOUSANDS

Freight Carloadings

THOUSANDS

BEEKLY AVERAGES
900
900

800
800

40

41
700
700

666

600

'30
500

500

400

400

APR.

MAR.

FEB.

JAN.

MAY

JULY

JUNE

AUS.

SEPT.

OCT.

NOV.

DCC.

DOLLARS

DOLLARS

BILLIONS

MILLIONS

Net Railway Operating Income
CLASS RAILROADS

100

100

80

80

'41

40

60

60

4

40

30
x

x

0

c
JAN.

MAR.

FEB.

APR.

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUG.

SEPT.

OCT.

NOV.

DEC.

CARS

CARS

THOUSANDS

THOUSANDS

New Freight Car Orders
x

20

'30

40

'41

15

15

10

10

$

5

6

0

FEB.

MAY

JULY

AUR.

SEPT.

OCT.

DEC.

c. 375

LIGHTERAGE FREIGHT IN STORAGE

AND ON HAND FOR UNLOADING IN NEW YORK HARBOR
1939
NOV.

1940

APR.

JAN.

DEC.

JUNE

MAY

194 1
SEPT.

AJE.

JULY

OCT.

NOV.

JAN.

DEC.

APR.

MAR.

FCB.

TT

CARLOADS

CARLOADS
THOUSANDS

THOUSANDS

12

12

"

11

10

10

9

8
7
6

6
5

5
4

4
3

3

FEB.

2

3

JAN.

17

16

MAR.

30

13

APR.

27

25

11

MAY

22

8

JUNE

6

20

JULY

26

23

9

3

6

9

DEC.

1939

20

12

AUG.

SEPT.

OCT.

NOV.

7

NOV.

23

28

21

DEC.

4

25

14

18

JAN.

I

11

31

15

I

28

17

15

MAR.

FCO.

29

12

26

APR.

1941

1940

*LARGELY EXPORT FREIGHT, BUT ABOUT 10% REPRESENTS FREIGHT FOR LOCAL
AND COASTAL SHIPMENT. FIGURES EXCLUDE GRAIN.

c 303 A
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury
Divides of Research and Statistics

1
EXPORT FREIGHT MOVEMENT

CARLOADS
THOUSANDS

Exports

FROM New YORK*

Nw

5

When

4

4

3

2

2

1941

1940

1939

CARLOADS
THOUSANDS

CARLOADS
THOUSANDS

Receipts for Export
7
6

6

AT New YORK"
5

5
4

MM

3

2

AT 9 OTHER NORTH

ATLANTIC PORTS**

AT 6 PACIFIC PORTS

0

o

A

0

.

1939

M

1940

1941

AS ESTIMATED FROM DATA OF GENERAL MANAGERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK.

105

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS.

C-382
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury
Division of Research and Statistics

Chart 3

-

U.S. TOTAL TRADE AND EXPORTS BY COMMODITIES
1930

....

1932

.

....

....

1934

lest

1941

1940

1939

1938

500

TOTAL TRADE

500

400
400

Imports

Exports

350

Response

N

MWV

500

300

250

250
200

200

150

100
150

Trade Balance

150

100

so

-so

-100

1930

1929

1933

1934

1935

1934

1933

1938

1937

1934

1940

1929

1941

EXPORTS OF U.S MERCHANDISE
Selected Nonagricultural Commodities

Total Nonagricultural

DOLLARS
DOLLARS

DOLLARS

icen and Steel
Machinery

325

300

275

140

250

225

Automobiles

200

175

24

150

Aircraft

125

100

Chemicals
75

50

25

.

MAR MAY JULY SEPT NOV

o

JAN

Selected Agricultural Commodities

Total Agricultural
DOLLARS

Cotton

Millions

DOLLARS

DOLLARS

DOLLARS

Tobacco

150

125

100

A
75

38

50

29

25

-

0 JAN MAR MAY JULY SEPT NOV
C-300-1-4

INDEXES OF NEW ORDERS
Combined Index of New Ordere and Selected Component

POICTS

220

210

Total lecabined Index)

210

1000 100

200

200

190

190

180

180

170

170

160

160

150

150

140

140

130

130

120

120

110

110

100

100

90

90

80

Total excluding Steel and Textiles
80

70

70

60

50

40

40

30

Steel Orders
30

20

10

Textile Orders
10

0

1940

1-85-D

Chart 6

108

MOVEMENT OF BASIC COMMODITY PRICES

Domestic and Imported
AUGUST 1939-100
PER

Weekly Average

CENT

PER

PER

CENT

CENT CENT

PER

Daily
145

145
140
140

140

140

// Imported

Commodities

130

135

135

130

// Imported
Commodities

130

130
120

120

125

125

17 Domestic
Commodities

110

110

17 Domestic
Commodities

120

120

115
F

J

D

N

A

M

M

-

o

J

.

S

1941

FEB.

I

A

J

J

F

1940

.

M

22

IS

22

29

$

A

17

IS

-

12

APR.

MAR.

24

,

M

115

10

24

"

100

100

MAY

1941

Percentage Change for Individual Commodities, August 1940 Low to April 25 and to May 2. 1941
PER

PER

CENT

Tellow 11432

17 Domestic Commodities

CENT

II Imported Commodities

+100

+100

Cocoa 90.0%
Burlap 85.0%

+80

Cottonseed Oil 75.9X

+80

Shellac 690%

Lard 613X
Print Cloth 526X
Wheat 35.7%

+60

Wool 51.9%

+60

Hides 513%

Hogs 35.4X

Butter 274x

Coffee 50/X

Barley 271%

Lead 232X

+40

+40

Flaxseed 29.9X
Sugar 29.5X

Cotton 194%
Reain 192X

Rubber 24.1%

Zinc 15.1%

Copper 11.8X

+20

Steel Scrap.dom. 8.7%
Corn 7.8X

+20

Silk 106%
-Tin 32%

Steers 75%
Steel Screp.exp. 2.7%

0

0

Aug Low

Apr.25 May 2

Aug. Low

Apr. 25 May 2
P-199-21

Dividen of - - -

P 214

Office of the Secretary of the Treasury

APRIL 26, 1941

APRIL 1940

WEEK ENDED

0

MISCELLANEOUS

2

FUEL AND LIGHTING
HIDES AND LEATHER
HOUSEFURN SHINGS

METAL AND METAL PROD.

ALL COMMODITIES

FARM PRODUCTS

CHEMICALS, ETC.
4

6

8

BUILDING MATERIALS

FOODS

10

TEXTILE PRODUCTS

PERCENT
CHANGE

Percentage Changes, April 1940 to Week Ended April 26. 1941

PRICE INDEXES BY COMMODITY GROUPS

B.L.S.

110
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 5, 1941
TO

FROM

Secretary Morgenthau
Mr. Haas

According to Work Projects Administration reports, a

decline of 21,000 brought the number of persons employed to
1,586,000 persons for the week ended April 23, 1941.

111
WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION

Number of Workers
Employed - Weekly
United States
Week ending
1940-41

October 2
October 9
October 16
October 23
October 30
November 6
November 13
November 20
November 27
December 4
December 11
December 18
December 25

Number of Workers

(In thousands)
1,747
1,763
1,768

1,776
1,779
1,783
1,786
1,807
1,822
1,832

1,855
1,872
1,878

January 1
January 8
January 15
January 22
January 29

1,880
1,887

February 5
February 12
February 19
February 26

1,892
1,893
1,885
1,867

March 5
March 12
March 19
March 26

1,806
1,764
1,736
1,708

April 2
April 9
April 16
April 23

Source: Work Projects Administration

1,894
1,895
1,895

1,662

1,634
1,607

1,586

112
WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION

Number of Workers
Employed - Monthly
United States
Number of Workers
1938

July
August
September
October
November
December
1939

January
February
March

April
May

June

July
August
September

October
November
December

(In thousands)
3,053
3,171

3,228
3,346
3,287
3,094

2,986
3,043
2,980
2,751
2,600
2,551
2,200
1,842
1,790
1,902
2,024
2,152

1940

January
February
March

April
May

June

July
August
September
October
November
December
1941

January
February
March

2,266
2,324
2,288
2,092
1,926
1,665
1,701
1,691

1,704
1,779
1,821
1,878
1,895
1,867
1,708

Source: Work Projects Administration

Monthly figures are weekly figures for the latest week of
the month.

They include certified and noncertified workers.

113
WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION
Number of Workers Employed

United States

Monthly W.P.A. Employment

1936

1937

1930

Tookly V.P.A. Employment

1939

1940

'42

1942

1941

- MAY AM ACCL IN - 2008, MAX miss MET BOY - OF

MILLIONS MILLIONS

"I""

WORKERS WORKERS
2.7

2.4

2.6

12

3.2

2.5

2.5

2.4

2.4
2.8

2.8
2.3

2.3

2.2

2.2
2.4

2.4

2.1

2.1

2.0

2.0

1.9

2.0 1.9

2.0

1.8

1.8

1.7

1.7

LA

1.6

1.4
1.6

1.5
1.5
1.2

1.2
1.4

1.4

1.3

1.3

1.2

.8

1.2

1.1

1.1

1.0
.4

1.0

.9

.9

0

1935 1936

1937

1938

1939

1940

1941

.

....
JAN.

42

MAR.

MAY

JULY

1940

SEPT.

NOV.

JAN.

MAR.

MAY

JULY

1941

SEPT.

NOV.

-

MA.

1942

SOURCES WORK PROJECTS ADMERISTRATION

Z - 221
Treasury

114
CONFIDENTIAL

TENTATIVE LESSONS BULLETIN

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

No. 100

WAR DEPARTMENT

0-2/2657-235

Washington, May 5, 1941

NOTICE

The information contained in this series of bulletins
will be restricted to items from official sources which are
reasonably confirmed. The lessons necessarily are tentative
and in no sense mature studies.
This document is being given an approved distribution,

and no additional copies are available in the Military Intelligence Division. For provisions governing its reproduction,
see Letter TAG 350.05 (9-19-40) M-B-M.

THE 1941 GERMAN MOTORIZED INFANTRY DIVISION

SOURCE

This bulletin is based upon information received from
an American official observer in Belgrade in April, 1941.

CONTENTS

1.

G-2 COMMENT

2.

DETAILED ORGANIZATION OF THE DIVISION

3.

ARMAMENT AND EQUIPMENT

CONFIDENTIAL

-1-

115
CONFIDENTIAL

THE 1941 GERMAN MOTORIZED INFANTRY DIVISION
1.

G-2 COMMENT

The transformation of the striking force of the German
Army from an infantry-artillery force with tank and air support
to a tank-air force with infantry and artillery support made
surprisingly rapid progress during the winter 1940-1941.
The most recent indication of this trend of German
military thought is the appearance of a 1941 model motorized
infantry division. This unit can scarcely be termed a motorized

infantry division in the American sense of that term; rather is

it a cross between the old-style German motorized infantry division

and the German armored division.

The 1941 organization is particularly distinguished by

the following:

a. A marked decrease of rifle strength in infantry
units of the division;
b. The appearance of light tanks in infantry regiments;
C. The particularly large number of antitank guns on
self-propelled mounts in all echelons.

The diminution of rifle strength in this new division

is very marked. Where there were 27 rifle companies in the old
division, there are only 12 in the new. Where the strength of
rifle companies was about 4000, or 25% of the total strength of
the old division, that strength is now about 2000, or 14% of the
total strength of the new division.
Although rifle strength has been diminished, the few
rifle units remaining have been given a strikingly increased number
of supporting weapons. In the old German motorized infantry regiment,
there were nine rifle companies and five supporting weapons companies.
In the new regiment, there are four rifle companies and seven supporting
weapons companies.

These supporting weapons companies vary in their composi-

tion, but they are generally classified as follows:
2 machine gun companies;

1 light tank company:
CONFIDENTIAL

-2 -

116
CONFIDENTIAL

1 infantry howitzer company of 75-sm. or 105-mm.
howitzers on self-propelled mounts of a semitank character;
1 infantry howitzer company of 75-mm. howitzers
towed behind prime movers;

2 antitank companies armed with 37-mm. or 47-mm.
antitank guns mounted on self-propelled mounts

of a semi-tank character.

The appearance of tanks in the German motorized infantry

regiment is obviously a development of great significance. It
must be interpreted as an effort to give the regiment offensive
power which riflemen cannot develop alone. The inclusion of a

tani: company in each regiment, however, must be considered but a

transitional solution. Many light tanks have become surplus in

the German Army as a result of their replacement by medium tanks

in Panzer divisions. It seems probable that a further increase
in the tank strength of the motorized infantry division will take
place by the spring of 1942.

Use of the self-provelled mount is another feature which
deserves attention. Such mounts are provided for the following
weapons:

75-mm. infantry howitzers;
105-mm. howitzers;

37-mm. antitank guns;
47-mm. antitank guns.

The trend towards placing infantry support weapons on
self-propelled mounts must be accounted one of the most striking
features of the new division.

The antitank strength of the new division is imposing
when measured by standards existing in the armies of the world.
There are in the division thirty-six 37-mm. antitank guns and
sixty 47-mm. antitank guns, or a total of 96 antitank guns. In
addition, 40 antiaircraft guns of various calibers are capable
of antitank action in case of necessity. This antitank strength
appears greater than that of a United States army corps.
The presence in the motorized infantry division of an
antiaircraft battalion armed with machine guns of 15-mm., 20-mm.,
and 37-mm. caliber must be now considered normal German procedure.
CONFIDENTIAL

-3 -

117
CONFIDENTIAL

If the present German trend of thought is followed, a further
increase of divisional antiaircraft can be looked for.
There are two possible explanations of the existence of

this new type motorized infantry division. First, it may be-intended by the Germans as a task force organization to work with
the Panzer division as an integral element of Panzer corps or
perhaps even Panzer armies. Second, it may mark a stage in the

transformation of the infantry division into the Panzer division.
2.

DETAILED ORGANIZATION OF THE DIVISION

The 1941 German motorized infantry division, which includes
about 14,000 officers and men, is said to cover 26 kilometers halted
and 110 kilometers on the march, Its detailed organization follows:
a. Motorized Reconnaissance Battalion:
2 armored car companies, each with 18 light armored
cars and 6 heavy armored cars;
1 motorcyclist company;
1 heavy weapons company, composed of

1 infantry howitzer platoon of 75-mm. infantry
howitzers,

1 antiaircraft platoon of 20-mm. antiaircraft
machine guns,

1 pioneer platoon.
b. Three Motorized Infantry Regiments, each organized
as follows:
Regimental headquarters;

Signal platoon;

1st Battalion, composed of
2 rifle companies,
1 machine gun company;

2nd Battalion, composed of
CONFIDENTIAL

--

118
CONFIDENTIAL

2 rifle companies,
1 machine gun company;

3rd Battalion, accompanying weapons, composed of

1 light tank company of 15 to 17 light tanks,
Class II type, 9 tons,

1 assault artillery company of six to eight
75-mm. infantry howitzers or 105-mm.
howitzers on self-propelled mounts,

1 infantry howitzer company of eight 75-mm.
infantry howitzers towed behind prime
movers;

4th Battalion, tank destroyer, composed of
2 companies of 47-mm. antitank guns on selfpropelled mounts, or sometimes 1 company

of 47's and 1 company of 37's.

C. Divisional Antitank Battalion:*
2 companies of 47-mm. antitank guns on self-propelled
mounts:

1 company of 75-mm. antitank guns on self-propelled
mounts.

d. Divisional Antiaircraft Battalion:
1 company of sixteen 15-mm. antiaircraft machine guns;
1 company of twelve 20-mm. antiaircraft machine guns;
1 company of eight 37-mm. antiaircraft machine guns.

e. Division Artillery:
3 battalions, each of 3 batteries of 105-mm. howitzers;
1 battalion of 3 batteries of 150-mm. howitzers;
1 flash and sound ranging battalion.

*In a few divisions this battalion has been enlarged to
a two-battalion regiment. G-2.
CONFIDENTIAL

5-

119
CONFIDENTIAL

f. Divisional Pioneer Battalion:
2 pioneer companies;

1 pontoon company of light and heavy pontoons.

g. Divisional Signal Battalion:
1 radio company;
1 telephone company.

h. Divisional Medical Battalion:
1 collection company;
1 hospital company.

1. Divisional Trains:
2 companies for gas and oil transport;
3 companies for ammunition and food transport;
1 company for motor vehicle repair and maintenance;
1 company for tank supply.
3.

ARMAMENT AND EQUIPMENT

The armament of the division is as follows:
45 command liaison vehicles;
58 armored reconnaissance cars;

50 light tanks:
24 assault artillery vehicles - 75-mm. or 105-mm.
howitzers on self-propelled mounts;
324 machine guns;
108 50-mm. and 81-mm. mortars;

26 75-mm. infantry howitzers;
36 105-mm. howitzers;

12 150-mm howitzers;
36 37-mm. antitank guns;
60 47-mm. antitank guns;
16 15-mm. antiaircraft machine guns;
16 20-mm. antiaircraft machine guns;
8 37-mm. antiaircraft machine guns;

800 motorcycles;

2600 trucks and motor vehicles.
CONFIDENTIAL
-

120
RESTRICTED

M.I.D., W.D.

G-2/2657-220; No. 383

12:00 M., May 5, 1941.

SITUATION REPORT

I. Western Theater.
Air: German. A very heavy attack was made on the
Liverpool area on the night of the 3d-4th. The attack was repeated
on a smaller scale last night while a primary effort was made against
Belfast.

British. Normal attacks on the night of the 3d-4th
against Cologne. The battle cruisers at Brest were bombed on the
nights of the 3d-4th and 4th-5th. Considerable success with night
fighters is claimed at Liverpool.
II. Mediterranean and African Theaters.
Ground: North Africa. The Axis attack on Tobruk appears
to have slowed down as the result of strong British counterattacks.
The British report a successful mechanized raid
in the Sollum sector.

Air: Axis. Continued attacks on Tobruk.
British. Harassing attacks in Libya.

III. Iraq.
Desultory fighting at Basra and Habbaniyah.

The R.A.F. is bombing out the Iraq air force at Baghdad.

Unconfirmed reports that the oil pipe line Mosul-Haifa
has been cut. This is believed probable.

RESTRICTED

CONFIDENTIAL

121

Paragrams of Code /

Received as the

as with, my 5, 1941.
Loston, filed 15:33, My >, 1941.

In - to year neveral requests for information regarding the

- assured ons, the following is submitted.
1. This is a standard Garana sendered ear, of which many are is

operation. Stae is available as present for the United States Army.

2. Details of description are as follows:
Weight: 9 to 10 British team

Length: 17.5 feet

Height: , feet
Ground clearease: 20 inches

Armor basis: 30-mm.

Crows 4 to 5 (two drivers, - or two - and Assember One 10- - - heavy mehias - - light
medical 3. The engine is placed is the year and is 90 to 100 h.p. The
our has deal-steering fare and are and eight-shool drive. Nextman speed is

" mg Redies of setter is see atles. Each - has redie senting equipment
and - internal telephone system.
LEE

Distributions
Secretary of Year
State Department

Secretary of Treasury
Union Secretary of Wer

Amount Force
6-3
6-4

Ohiof of Staff

Assistant Chief of Staff, as

New Please Division

office of Neval Intelligence
Orderess
Cavalay

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

122

of Cafe Indiagree
Received as the Year Department

at 9:05, May 5, 1941.

Askers, filed May 4, 1941.

Near Dinetite a reitreed bridge use blem - w the Greeks during

the - attack. Also two reitrent belidgee ever the Herites River. the
appeareace of the bridges near Batree (Mrisnople) indicates that the Tarks
helped is this, although they strongly day having done so.
It is now agreed that the Germane will provide materials and the
Tarks will provide laborers for repairing the bridgee. The Gerusas premise

that they will make as use of the railroad line to bring either milities of
var or soldiers to Greek territory.
As present, freight is being sent by my of the Deanbo and Tarkish

freight is being given advenced priority. Stories are going about regarding

a closing of the frombier, but most with vigeross dentals.
I have good reason to believe reports reaching no to-day that the Germans

have taken Nytilene. About 40 additional assistants have Joined the
German consulate at Istember during recent weeks, according to reports.
KLUBS

Distributions
Secretary of War
State Department

Secretary of Treasury
Union Secretary of Mar

Chief of Staff
Assistant Chief of Staff, 6-2

War Please Division

Office of Naval Intelligence

CONFIDENTIAL

123

CONFIDENTIAL
of Code

Received as the Mair Department

as my so 2042.

Ashave, filed my 5, 1941.

the following is contexplated distribution Switch trages .
General - opposite Bulgerian frestier, one earge
pies - material accinnatived division and 8 envaloy division.
Cabalee Line to about 30 miles east of Beegaroe, four
corge.

In year of Callipoli Pentasula defense line, two earge.
The area to the seatheast of Inmis, two divisions.

Encept for the above changes other dispositions show change.
The possibility of Common attache from captured Greek talente and

the Delecenses and also is the area w my of the Black Sea places
Turkey is a new trop in the episten of the Attache. According to a voliable

source preparations are entervay w - and Bulgeria for regular
chipping to Greese from Black Bee parts. the Governa have econpied Ehiss
Island.

Although mefficial there 10 a good deal of critical talk regarding
the British and to a leaser extens about the United States for having given

-

- to small actions to vesict - and premising holp which
never errives as this leads to provoking the Distributions
Secretary of Year
State Department

Begretary of
Union Secretary of Your

chief of Staff,

Assistant What of staff, as
Mar Please Division

office of Meral Intelligence

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

124

Paraphress of Code Cablegram

Received at the War Department

at 9:19, May 5, 1941.
London, filed 15:35, May 5, 1941.

1. British Air Activity over the Continues.
&.

During the day of May 4 offensive patrols operated

over Northeastern France) six medium bombers with fighter essorts

attacked shipping in the harbor of Cherbourg) and in activity over
the North Sea area sunk one Axis tranier.

b. Operations during the night of May 314 were as follows:
100 heavy bombers over Cologne, 9 heavy bombers over Rotterdam, and

34 against German battleships at Brest. Fighter planes were on
offensive patrols over German airdrones in Northeastern France.
Two German planes are known to have been destroyed and two probable.

Aircraft from the Coastal Command carried out raids on airfields
and oil storage points in Southern Norway.

2. German Air Activity over Britain.
A.

German activity during the night of May 45 was very

extensive with principal attacks falling on Liverpool and Liverpool
Day, East Anglis, Yorkshire as far north as the Tyne River, Lincolnshire, and Belfast, as well as a few on London. As yet there are
no reports on the damage from these raids, but it is thought to
be heavy.

b. During the day of May 4 German operations over
Britain were on a minor scale. There were a few small formations
over Kent, one over Shoeburyness, one over Devon and Commall.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

125

a. the nights of my 24 > - - - platted
over Buttain.

s The day of my 30 90 - I were over Britain,
and 400 fighters on defensive patral along the was - of

Deman territory.
3. Aircraft Leases MINA Theater.
a. During all of the operations on May , described above
there were no British locase. Also, during the operations of My 40
there were no lesses.
h.

During the operations of the night of May us, night

fighters are known to have destroyed two Common planes. One German

plane was destroyed during the operations over Britain - May 4.
Labort figures on Geman siveraft lessee the night of May 34 are as

follows: 12 I destroyed and 4 probable, 3 damaged by night
fighters, 2 destroyed by antiairerants fire, and one by balloon.

4. British Air Activity other Theaters.
s.

Bevelian Theater.

British planes based in Egypt attacked Bengasi harbor,
and landing fields at Derna, Gamalla, Barks Bening, as well as enemy

shipping off Bengasi. Two German troop-transporting aircraft were

destroyed and others damaged. Is addition - ship was set afire.

b. Thember.
the Reyel Air Force basied meter transport tosties and apply damps around Gender and wha Alage. In this

attack Free French aircraft - flying English medican participated.
&. Treat Theater.
Regal Air Force please attached Image trease and guns

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

126

middle statement of and dropped 20 test of
have on Drough wage and - - - signature

has destroyed as D which is - half the

so
ether
s - The

total Immg strength.

There were wall Committee ablesis on Alexanders but damage was restained.

b. Libera Thanker.
Two airports and a deelyard as Mile - attached w
40 German planes. Ten of these places dropped paradate mines in
the harber.

s. Treat Theater.
Insigi-Italian airplanes attached the British as
Habbertya airport but no damage was asstained.

6. Air other Thankson.
s There were no British lessee suffered during their
Dragt attack.

h. In the German abtook on miss, - of their planes
was destroyed and one damaged. In the Irregi-Italian attack on the

British as - plane was last.
Following is a - of information received from British
Military Inbelligence - to 7700 a.m., my 5t
1. A British ship was abtented by a admarine 40 miles was
of Issland on May 4.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

127

2. The British squaterettack at Toback - repulsed by

Germans with tanks, mashine guns and film Reserver,
there were heavy German lesses and few British, A British patrol

destroyed a large Axis monition drop in the visinity of Sellam.
3. The British operations in Abysainia are propressing
satisfactorily.
4. The total number of Troops evacuated from Greese is now
51,600.

5. At Maman (Amman?) Trans-Jordan, minor disturbances which
have been dispersed are reported.
LEE

Distribution
Secretary of War
State Department

Secretary of Treasury
Under Secretary of War

Chief of Staff
Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2
War Plans Division

office of Naval Intelligence
Air Corps

Assistant Chief of Staff, G-3

CONFIDENTIAL

128
NEW YORK STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

CORNELL UNIVERSITY
ITHACA. NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND FARM MANAGEMENT

May 6, 1941

PERSONAL

Hon. Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

Secretary of the Treasury
Washington, D. C.
Dear Henry:

I have gone over your testimony before the House Ways and
Means Committee and the other material sent to me by George Haas.
I have considered these problems with Pearson and while I can't
give much constructive help I am giving you my comments below.
I am sending a copy of this to George Haas and am sending him
some more detailed suggestions for possible use by him.

I believe it is true that benefit payments to farmers have
increased farm incomes only to the approximate amount of the

dollars distributed by the government. All available evidence
points to the correctness of this conclusion but I can't prove it

absolutely.

The best argument against increased farm subsidies would
be the great improvement in farm incomes since August 1939 and

the promise of further improvement as long as a high rate of industrial
activity continues and the trend of prices remains upward.

1. Most of the variation in total farm income arises from
variations in the general price level.
2. Farm prices of farm products rise and fall faster than
the prices of articles farmers buy, as is shown by the following
changes in index numbers of prices from August 1939 to April 1941
(1910 - 1914 - 100):

U.S. farm prices of farm products 88 to 110,
up 25%

Articles farmers buy, including interest and
taxes 125 to 129, up only 3%

129
-2-

3. The major price problems in agriculture at the present

time are cotton and wheat. Prices of these products have increased
from August 1939 to April 1941 and will rise further, but they are

still low. Wheat, 64 to 86, up 34%, but still low. Cotton, 70 to

85, up 20%, but still low.

The corn belt, the dairy regions and most other areas are
in reasonably good condition with prospects of further improvement.
The most serious agricultural problem in the industrial regions is
farm labor.

As you know, the hardest argument that you will have to meet
is that of providing equality of treatment under the defense program

between agricultural and city labor. I can't answer that one but
it will be taken care of in due course if the general trend of prices
continues upward.

I will be at the Hay-Adams Hotel in Washington for several
days during the latter part of this week, over the week-end, and the
early part of next week. Although most of my time will be taken up
with committee meetings I will be free evenings, Saturday afternoon,
Sunday, and Monday morning if there is anything that I can do.
With warm personal regards, I am,
As ever

Bhyyes
W. I. Myers

WIM:mn

cy - Mr. George Haas

130

May 6, 1941
9:30 a.m.
GROUP MEETING

Present:

Mr. Thompson
Mr. Haas

Mr. Foley

Mr. Graves
Mr. Gaston
Mr. Kuhn

Mr. White
Mr. Schwarz
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Stewart
Miss Chauncey

Mr. Sullivan

H.M.Jr:

Here is a letter from Mike Monroney.

Graves:

I can give you a report on that. As I told

you, the Post Office is not under the Post

Office jurisdiction at the Capitol. House

Post Offices are under Speaker Rayburn, and
Senate Post Offices under a committee presided
over by Senator Byrnes. The Post Office has no

control over and nothing to do with the

management of those offices.
They did make arrangements late yesterday,

however, for those offices to put our stamps
on sale beginning today. The question of
whether bonds can be put on sale there at

all is somewhat difficult, it not being a
part of the Postal System. There will be

131

-2special arrangements necessary. I think
perhaps the best way to do it would be for
us to send our own clerks there to act as

our sales agents. I am to talk to the

Speaker at eleven thirty this morning.
have already talked, as a matter of getting
I

advice, with Senator Byrnes.

Senator Byrnes said that we ought not to take

too seriously what this fellow said, that he

doubts the wisdom of our doing this, although
he sees no objection to our doing it on the
basis of our sending our clerks there to

handle it. It is obviously a matter that

we will have to be a little careful about.
The Post Offices down there are patronage

jobs and entirely different from our regular
Post Offices. What we can do is entirely a
matter of what they will permit us to do,

but we will - I will take it up with them

on the basis of our sending our own clerks
down there, at least for a period long enough
to tell what volume develops and whether it

is worthwhile to go on with it.

H.M.Jr:

Now, on that subject, I got a little restless
this morning.

Graves:

I see you did.

H.M.Jr:

I don't know whether you know which one I
am on.

Graves:

Well, you sent me a note.

H.M.Jr:

No. I called up Mr. Bell's office and said,
"Who would normally report on sales of bonds

and so forth?" And they said, "Mr. Heffelfinger,
so I had Heffelfinger in here and I was surprised to learn that if the thing - there have

been no steps taken, for instance to find out

132
3-

how many stamps had been sold through the

Post Offices other than -Graves:

Well, that isn't right. If you were told
that, that is wrong.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you had better tell that to Heffelfinger.

Graves:

I did tell him.

H.M.Jr:

Have you told it to him since nine o'clock?

Graves:

Yes, sir. I told it to him just before

coming in here. Of course, Postal Savings
Stamps are not our security, and we would
not automatically get anything whatever on

Postal Savings Stamps.
H.M.Jr:

That is what he said.

Graves:

We have to get that out of Post Offices. Where
he misinformed you is to say that no steps have
been taken to get that. We are getting telegraphic reports from the hundred largest Post
Offices every day that show the sales of
stamps.

H.M.Jr:

Papa has never seen them.

Graves:

I had that in my hand yesterday. I didn't

want you to see them.
H.M.Jr:

Before we go any further, I want to congratulate
you on your speech yesterday.

Graves:

Thank you.

H.M.Jr:

It
towas
it. very, very good. I enjoyed listening

Graves:

Thank you.

133
4-

H.M.Jr:

All right. Handing me Mike's letter got
me off. I meant to say that to you first.
Why not let's wait until Heffelfinger comes
in at eleven thirty, see, and you come with
him.

Graves:

Fine. I think I would like to bring Mr. Reagh

H.M.Jr:

You know me by now. I keep poking until I

from Mr. Haas' office.

get what I want, and I was riled onto it by
the New York Tribune this morning.

Eleven thirty. Want to come in?
Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

George had better come in himself because I

Graves:

Well, we have the facts, Mr. Morgenthau.

H.M.Jr:

Well, even if the news is bad, I am old enough

Graves:

My point is, I tried to say yesterday, that

am getting hot on this and I am not going to
sit here and not get something.

to take it. I am twenty-one.

the lag between the time of the transaction
and the time of the reporting by the Federal
Bank is so great that the statistics we have
don't show it.

H.M.Jr:

Why doesn't Heffelfinger know about it?

Graves:

Well, I think he does know.

H.M.Jr:

He didn't know anything this morning. He
didn't know any more than I did, which was
nothing.

Graves:

We are right on top of that.

134

-5H.M.Jr:
Graves:

He is the man, isn't he?

No, Mr. Heffelfinger's people get only the
cash receipts at the Treasury, and that is
no index.

H.M.Jr:

Let's at eleven thirty spend a little time
on it.

George, you come in yourself. I serve notice
on everybody, I am going to get this stuff.
Now, George, this memorandum which I want to
go back in Haas' weekly report, on page seven,

George, where you say, "In view of the current

record"- this is in regard to - it shows that

the price of cotton goods are up twenty-three
percent. "It is strange that no change has

been made in the Department of Agriculture
surplus disposal program which includes subsidy
payments on exports of cotton products."
Now, does that mean that their program on

buying cotton goods is - has just continued
just the same?

Haas:

H.M.Jr:

I based that on a very recent review of the
Department of Agriculture cotton market. I
assume it has. That is what they stated the
other day when they put out their publication.

Well, why don't you call up the office of the
Secretary of Agriculture and say in my behalf
that we are interested in view of this abnormal increase in the price of cotton goods,

what are they doing about it. I would like
to know. I would like to know, see?

Haas:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

And what we can't understand, it looks on the
surface as though they were going ahead just

135

-the same. In other words, that their thinking
has remained static. They are still thinking
in terms of five or six million bale export
markets of cotton which we had a year or two
ago, and they haven't adjusted themselves to

the situation. Is that correct or is it
wrong?

Haas:

That is what it looks like.

H.M.Jr:

Well, call up his office and ask for somebody

Haas:

I will be glad to.

H.M.Jr:

Who is that assistant of his? Mr. Hamilton

in his office, will you?

seems to get results there.

H.M.Jr:

Hamilton, yes. I will talk to Hamilton.
Just tell him perfectly frankly that this is

Haas:

Yes, sir, I will do that. It looks as if

Haas:

H.M.Jr:

what you told me, are you wrong or what, see?

they are just continuing on as they did before,
irrespective of the new situation.
Harry, there is no reason why you and Coe
can't have this. (Handing Mr. White memo
from War Department to Secretary dated

April 29.)

Evidently General Maxwell asked for what they
were doing in England on economic control.

It is quite interesting. But be sure and
get it back to Miss Chauncey, tonight.

White:

I will do that.

H.M.Jr:

Please.

Did you (Kuhn) have a chance to reach the
fellow at the Embassy?

136

7

-

Kuhn:

Yes, I did. I gave him your message, and he
will let me know.

H.M.Jr:

What I was thinking was, you see, I have given

them two times, two fifteen and tonight. Well,
if that General comes for dinner, then there
is no reason why Professor Hall couldn't come

at two fifteen; and if Professor Hall comes
for dinner, then that other General could come

at two fifteen.

In other words, I am giving them two spots.
Now, one other thing. One Merle Cochran very
correctly sent me a very complete and full
data of information which he receives from
various sources about the English, and asks

me very correctly, should he give this to one
John Wiley.

Gaston:

At this meeting yesterday morning, the decision

was to ask what information - now, this isn't
a question of his giving information to John
Wiley, but information as to what information
he is getting and the character of information
he is getting and from what sources.

This meeting started by the Secretary of War,
of which you designated me as a member, we

discovered during the meeting that the purpose

was to try to coordinate the dissemination of
of information about what is going on abroad,
and so the only decision that was taken

yesterday was to ask each member to come back

at another meeting to report what were their
sources of information, who in the departments
was getting that information and what kind of
information were they getting.
H.M.Jr:

Well now, Herbert, am I not correct that you
told me two or three times that this committee
does nothing but sit around and fight over

137

-8-

small jurisdictional -Gaston:

This committee has nothing to do with any
committee that has heretofore existed at

all. It is an entirely new thing as a result

of a letter that was sent to you by Stimson
and which you asked me to write a letter to Stimson
designating me as the person to sit on this
conference.

The purpose of the conference, as stated by
Stimson, was to try to arrange a better method

of dissemination of information, and the letter
was rather vague as to the kind of information,

but - and General Miles was also rather vague
yesterday, but it seems that what they want
is better dissemination and at the same time

better protection of information coming from
abroad as to the progress of the war.
H.M.Jr:

This is what I am very glad to do. I am very
glad to have Merle Cochran prepare a little
statement which in the first half dogen instances

I will edit, if we receive any information

which we feel would be of use to these people.
Gaston:

I think you have to exercise judgment.

H.M.Jr:

As to my sources, I am not going to reveal
them any more than they do.

Gaston:

Well, it isn't only Merle Cochran, you know.
There are several points in Treasury where
we are getting information.

H.M.Jr:

Well, whatever - wherever it heads up, I won't

do it any more than they do it. I think this,
that if we have something which we think is

exclusive, I would be very glad after I pass this

on it to furnish it to them; but we get

information just for one reason, that these
people trust us; and the President himself

138
9-

said there are only two places in Washington
to keep information. One is in the Treasury,
and the other is the Navy Department. He
says they are the only two people who can keep
any information.
Gaston:

I don't know the origin of this thing. You
got a letter from the Secretary of War. I
don't know what is back of this thing or just
exactly what they are reaching out for.

H.M.Jr:

Why don't you tell them that any information
we have reason to believe is exclusive and

would be useful, we would be glad to give it
to them from time to time, but we simply cannot

reveal our sources. Don't put that in writing.

Any more than the War Department - I got some-

thing I just sent to Merle Coc hran. Here is
a cable from Chungking entirely dealing with
me on this Stabilization Fund; and the more
pertinent parts of the cable, they have given
it to me.

I have asked Merle whether he can go over
there and read the cable and see whether they

have or not. The whole thing deals with
Chungking, the Generalissimo, the Stabilization
Fund and the rest of it.

Gaston:

Don't you think I had better talk to one or
two people such as State Department people

and see if we can't kill this thing, because
the way the thing is set up now, it seems
to be very poorly conceived.
H.M.Jr:

All right. After all, you have got a meeting

with General Miles, O.N.I., and Hoover and

yourself and sit around a table, don't you?
Gaston:

No, I attended a few meetings, but it doesn't
happen any more.

139
- 10 H.M.Jr:

Well, that is the place where if you said,
"Now look, boys, this and that and the other
thing about the ships, about some particular
stuff going around the country --

Gaston:

That has nothing to do with this.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I don't want to play unless you tell me

Gaston:

Well, I am inclined to think you are right.

I am all wrong.

You designated me as a member of this conference and I came in here yesterday and heard

their story.

H.M.Jr:

Do you think I am wrong?

Gaston:

There may be something that could be worked

out to let people know things they ought to
know, but I am doubtful about the ideas that

Miles seems to have and that the Secretary
of War seems to have, and it was altogether too
large a meeting we had yesterday anyway. There
were two people from Commerce and one man from
the Office of Emergency Management and another
one from National Research, Advisory Commission
Research.

H.M.Jr:

You know what the President has done. On
information he gets from the War Department,

he has limited it now to Harry Hopkins and
me. Nobody else can have it. That is what

he has done.
Gaston:

I just don't understand the War Department

starting this thing.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I wonder if they know that General Watson

personally is handling this for the President

and that the President has issued orders that
nobody should get it but Hopkins or me? Use
the old bean, Herbert, and let me know.

140

- 11 Gaston:

H.M.Jr:

I think it might be a good idea to get hold
of Miles and maybe Berle and two or three
people like that.
You might go over and have a heart to heart
talk with General Watson. I am sure he doesn't

know about this. At least he has called me
three times on this.

Gaston:

H.M.Jr:

The chances are this thing may have originated
with some subordinate over in the War Department.
He has called me three times last week about

this thing, about the President wanting to
keep the information secret. Just so that
you know - you know there is an officer called
Major Smith.

Gaston:

Yes, I know who he is.

H.M.Jr:

And he says the President is red hot on this

Gaston:

Yes, I don't doubt he is.

H.M.Jr:

So will you kind of --

Gaston:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

O.K.? All right. Anything else?

Gaston:

Are you starting in on me?

H.M.Jr:

Yes, I have been doing a lot of talking.

keeping it confidential.

Twenty-one minutes I have talked.

Gaston:

That is about the only thing I have. That
is what I wanted to talk to you about was

this particular thing.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Mr. Foley?

141

- 12 Foley:

We ought to have a meeting on Stabilization.

H.M.Jr:

Stabilization?

Foley:

Yes, we have got to go down on Thursday.
Are you going to be away all day tomorrow?

H.M.Jr:
White:

Well, when are you fellows ready?
This afternoon.

H.M.Jr:

What?

White:

This afternoon, late. It hasn't cleared
through everybody yet.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you are going to get the worst hour of

the day. I will give you four o'clock.

Foley:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

You bring whoever wants to come.

Foley:

Well, I wasn't aware that you were going to

be here tomorrow.

H.M.Jr:

All right.

Foley:

We will be ready.

H.M.Jr:

You had better. Professor Sullivan?

Sullivan:

I would like the next to the last hour today.

(Laughter) I would like to show you the
statement I am going to give on excess profits.

Foley:

Do it after ours.

Sullivan:

Oh no, I will be ready before you and Harry
White are ready. I won't need an hour.

H.M.Jr:

Fifteen minutes do you?

142
- 13 Sullivan:

Yes, fine.

H.M.Jr:

Lucky for me.

Sullivan:

Now, there was some talk of my testifying
tomorrow, but I find out that Mr. Henderson
and Mr. Eccles are going to testify tomorrow
and I don't think it would be good judgment
for me to be appearing with them.

H.M.Jr:

Getting choosey, are you?

Sullivan:

No --

H.M.Jr:

Is Eccles showing you his statement?

Sullivan:

No, and I haven't heard from Leon. I discussed
this with Herbert and Ed yesterday afternoon,
and they agree with me, that if I am up there
with them testifying at the same time they are,
it looks as though we are dividing things up.

H.M.Jr:

Don't you think you ought to see their state-

ments?

Sullivan:

I think I ought to see Leon's. I don't know

whether I should see Eccles' or not; and I
am not so sure it would be good judgment

to see Eccles', because he might very well

say now, "I showed this to Mr. Sullivan.
I can trust Leon, I am sure.
White:

You have a copy of his tax program?

Sullivan:

Yes, I have a copy of Eccles' tax program.

Gaston:

Did you read his speech before the --

Sullivan:

Yes.

Gaston:

He endorsed the Treasury program.

Sullivan:

Well, he has several wrinkles he wants to change.

143

- 14 H.M.Jr:

Oh, I suppose it is sort of undemocratic

to callvolunteer
up and say,
don't
it. "Let's see it," if they
Sullivan:

Leon did volunteer it, and I can call him and
say, "You may have forgotten about it."

H.M.Jr:

How did Leon react to O'Connell's --

Foley:

I haven't talked to Joe since he saw Leon.

Sullivan:

I will call Leon.

H.M.Jr:

What else?

Sullivan:

The bill is going along through a tremendous

list of witnesses. They started testifying
last Monday morning. They will go all this

week and probably all of next week.

The testimony is all in favor of raising three
and a half billion dollars; but in the industry
represented by the particular witness, there
is a peculiar situation and we hadn't ought

to tax that particular industry, but they are

very much less forceful than they have previously
been.

Whenever a member of a committee asks them

what substitute they had for a tax on that

particular industry, then they are in trouble.
I think they are getting along pretty well.

Now, on excess profits we have been working
very hard on that. Mr. Stam and Mr. Chesteen
were down yesterday, and the present proposal,
which will produce more than the four hundred

million suggested in our original schedule, is

144

- 15 -

to reverse the credits.
Under the present law, the corporation income

tax is figured first, and then that is a
deduction for purposes of computing the excess
profits tax.

We propose now to compute the excess profits

tax first and allow that as a deduction for

purposes of computing the corporation tax.
Just that shift will produce about seven hundred

million dollars extra.

Now, if we do that, the eight percent which
is now allowed on invested capital as a credit
is reduced to five and six tenths percent by
merely shifting those credits.
I had Carl Shoup down last week-end, and he

and Blough feel that that is altogether too

small for new money, that you can't induce
new money to go into a business if the top

non-taxable return for excess profits tax
purposes is five and six tenths percent; so
they suggest that that be raised to ten, which
with the shift, makes it seven percent and that
is the status of our thinking at the present
time.

H.M.Jr:

How does it hit the so-called "war babies"?

Sullivan:

We can't very well - now, for instance, that
would mean that United States Steel instead
of getting eight percent exempt from taxes

would get five and six tenths percent.

Now, so far as really soaking them is concerned,

we can't do that without soaking a lot of other
invested capital people that we don't want to
soak, but this would --

145
- 16 -

H.M.Jr:

Well, this ia a new idea. I haven't assimilated it yet.

White:

Could we all have a crack at that?

H.M.Jr:

It is terribly important.

Sullivan:

Certainly.

H.M.Jr:

Are you committed to this?

Sullivan:

No, sir, I am not committed to it.

H.M.Jr:

I can't just - I would like to get some
examples. It is the only way I can tell.

H.M.Jr:

All right, I will get some for you.
When is this thing going to jell? Are you

H.M.Jr:

recommending this difference?

Sullivan:

Am I recommending this to you?

H.M.Jr:

No, are you going to recommend this to Congress?

Sullivan:

If you approve it, yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I can't approve it that fast.

Sullivan:

Well, I can have some examples for you this
afternoon.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I have only given you 15 minutes. I
didn't know anything like this was coming

up.

Sullivan:
H.M.Jr:

I thought you asked-You are not going on tomorrow anyway, are

you?

146
- 17 Sullivan:

No,
but iflike
youto-are going to be away Thursday,
I would

Foley:

No, tomorrow.

H.M.Jr:

No, tomorrow forenoon. I will be back tomorrow afternoon.

Foley:

You will be testifying Thursday morning.

H.M.Jr:

Yes, but this is the first you have mentioned
this, John.

Sullivan:

That is r ight, and it was yesterday afternoon
before we had any kind of a clear-cut understanding of what we could do.

H.M.Jr:

Well, anybody who is interested in this
thing is invited in here at 3:15; anybody

of this group that is interested is invited
in, and the only way I can understand a
thing like this is to get some examples.

Sullivan:

I will have them for you.

H.M.Jr:

I just don't know.

Sullivan:

I will have them for you.

H.M.Jr:

It
is fast.
too important, John. I can't take it
that

Sullivan:

I am not trying to hurry you, sir.

H.M.Jr:

You say you only had this - does Shoup recom-

mend this?
Sullivan:

Yes, and Blough.

H.M.Jr:

Is he in town?

Sullivan:

No, he was here Friday and Saturday. What

147

- 18 Shoup would most prefer is a sliding scale

of eight million - eight and a half-H.M.Jr:

Do you have to make recommendations on

Sullivan:

No, I can postpone it until Friday, I think.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am going to ask you to postpone it
until I am satisfied and whoever else in
Treasury here is interested is satisfied.

Sullivan:

Yes, I will be very happy to have them look

H.M.Jr:

You see, the fact that the bill was written
so last year that these people - I can't

Thursday?

it over, sir.

think of any better name than the war babies can make abnormal profits and the fact that
we are not reaching them and are going to
soak everybody else, and then you find do what sounds like sleight of hand and still
don't--

Sullivan:

Oh, we reach them with this.

H.M.Jr:

But you reach everybody else, too.

Sullivan:

Yes, sir, we do.

H.M.Jr:

Do you reach the companies like J. C. Penney
and those companies that have very high returns?

Sullivan:

We do, and this is the only way that we will
be able to really cut into those fellows

because this shift will really take a bite

out of the "average earnings" company. Mr.
Stam doesn't know that yet.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I still say, let's go slow. You have

148
- 19 -

got to sell me.
Sullivan:

I can understand that.

H.M.Jr:

And the rest, anybody else who is interested.
Are you interested, Herbert? Anybody?

Gaston:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

I am not going off half cocked.

Sullivan:

I don't expect you to.

H.M.Jr:

All right. What else?

Sullivan:

That is all, sir.

Cochran:

Sales of securities were a little bigger

yesterday than they have been. Net about
500 thousand dollars. Seventy-seven thousand
from Switzerland, eighty-three thousand from
Canada, and a hundred and fifty-eight from
Latin-America. That is principally Venezuela
and Panama where the foreign set-ups are in
existence.

I have that note from Secretary Knox that you

mentioned. We did discuss it with Phillips
the other day.

H.M.Jr:

I wish you would tell Phillips for me to

tell Morris Wilson to tell Lord Beaverbrook
in diplomatic language, although he isn't

so diplomatic, that I think this is what we

call in America a bad bull. What Beaverbrook
is supposed to be doing, according to Knox,

he is setting up to - every time they give
us any information he is setting a value on

it which he is going to charge us for. If
they get into that kind of business, it is
just the height of stupidity. Now Lord

149
- 20 Beaverbrook, when I wanted the Rolls Royce
engine and said, "How much, he said, "You

take it and build it, and after the war,
if we win, then we will sit down and talk

what the Rolls Royce engine is worth.'
That is one attitude, and everybody was
wonderful. And now every time they give us
something, they are setting up something,

They begin to do it here, and it is the beginning of friction which shouldn't exist, and

if Phillips will tell Morris Wilson, who

speaks to Lord Beaverbrook every night, and

say I say it is just damned stupidity, and

I want an answer so I can answer Frank Knox.
Cochran:

The only thing, you might ask Ed if this
quid pro quo draft envisages charges for
information.

H.M.Jr:

No, no, no. But if Knox and what's-his-name

starts it, it is stupid. You can say for me

to Phillips to Morris Wilson to Beaverbrook,

I say it is just plain stupid. Use that

word, will you please?
Cochran:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

I say it is stupid. It is just the start-

ing of putting sand in the works, and Beaver-

brook should be the last fellow to do it.

He understands that kind of language. And

cite the Rolls Royce thing. That was

a magnificent gesture.
Foley:

Well, under the quid pro quo, don't you
think that we ought to wipe off the books
the two million dollars that has been set
aside in the budget to cover any possible
payments to Great Britain for the Rolls Royce
patents and royalties? In other words, instead of carrying that two million dollars
there indefinitely, it seems to me that when

150
- 21 we execute this quid pro quo agreement, we

can take into consideration that two million
dollars, and then wipe it off our books.

H.M.Jr:

But that doesn't pay the Rolls Royce Company.
Where does that leave the Rolls Royce Company in England?

Foley:

Well, that is between Great Britain and the
Rolls Royce people. That would wipe off the
indebtedness between the United States and

Great Britain. That is all that two million

dollars was for.
H.M.Jr:
Foley:

H.M.Jr:

I don't think we should take that initiative.
You mean you would rather leave the two

million dollars?

I would rather leave it on the books, and
say, "If you want two million dollars, we

are ready." That isn't information.
Foley:

No, those are patents and royalties.

H.M.Jr:

No, I wouldn't do that. I wouldn't make any

move at this time in any way to make the
English suspicious that we are getting down

to using an adding machine on them any more

than I want them to do it on me, see. Don't

you agree, Ferdie?
Kuhn:

H.M.Jr:

They are not in the state of mind for that.
And if Frank Knox gets this thing in his
mind, well, then he is going to begin holding

back. It is just plain stupidity if it is

true, and they ought to get me an answer
back just as soon as possible.
Cochran:

All right, sir.

151

- 22 H.M.Jr:
Foley:

I would use the word, just plain stupidity.
The Budget keeps calling up Norman Thompson

and asking about that two million dollars.
H.M.Jr:

Well, that would look as though we didn't
want to pay them. The gesture was a good

gesture. I would leave it that way unless
they want to raise it.

White:

In any case, it antedated the Lend-Lease

Foley:

Yes, but there is two million dollars frozen
over there which could be used - it is in

Bill.

the President's emergency fund and it could
be used for a number of purposes, and they

would like to put it out of there and put it
over on the lend-lease thing. It is a two
million dollar credit that the British have
got.
H.M.Jr:

But that is cash. I would leave it - let's

wait - look, when I get my answer from
Beaverbrook, let's see what he says, because
he may say, "Well what about that two million
dollars?"
Foley:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

Because I am referring to it, you see. When
we got the Rolls Royce thing, he said, "Now,
we will talk about that when the war is over,

if we win." Will you do that?

Cochran:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, sir.
Today?

Cochran:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Tell him I would like a prompt answer.

152
- 23 Cochran:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Walter?

Stewart:

Nothing.

H.M.Jr:

Ifcome
youonare
interested in that tax thing,
in.

Stewart:

Three fifteen?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. You ought to be interested. You are

Foley:

What time is Stanley coming in?

H.M.Jr:

Three thirty.

Foley:

Well, it is all in there.

H.M.Jr:

George?

Haas:

You wanted some figures--

H.M.Jr:

I told Philip Young this morning positively

Haas:

Thank you. You wanted the figures on the

always interested in new money in business.

no on Lindow.

four-engine bombers.
H.M.Jr:

Just stay behind a minute.
Mr. Schwarz?

Schwarz:

Harold's speech was so good that I kept the
same radio station on and about midnight
the Senate Beer Reporter said that you

indicated you were - you may have to abandon

your two thirds one third ratio, so I called

him and he said he got it from INS, and I
called them and they tried to defend it, and
by good fortune I had a copy of the transcript

153
- 24 of the press
would
fix it. conference, and they said they
H.M.Jr:

If
anybody said anything to the opposite, I
didn't.

Schwarz:

Cliff Berryman is sending up an SOS, the

cartoonist. He said his cartoon of you
shaking the tax payer for three and a half
million - he said he promised that to Vice

President Wallace, and our enthusiasm caused

him to give it to us and forget about it.
He would like to trade the original and
autograph a copy for you.

H.M.Jr:

Well, he has been so nice that - I don't
want
anything but originals. He can have it
back.

Schwarz:

We have a catalog now of them.

H.M.Jr:

Give it back to him because if I begin to
take photostats--

Schwarz:

H.M.Jr:

This is a photograph.
We may get mixed up, and we won't know which

is the original. I only want originals.

Schwarz:

It looks almost the same.

H.M.Jr:

But he has been so nice. Sure, by all means,
let him have it back.

Schwarz:

Thank you.

Here are a few stories if you want to see
them.

H.M.Jr:

Thanks, what else?

Schwarz:

Nothing.

154

- 25 H.M.Jr:

Harry?

White:

I have nothing.

H.M.Jr:

You were to give me a rewrite yesterday on

that letter on the Mediterranean Basin thing.

White:

I sent it in last night, I guess possibly
after you had gone. I sent it in to Miss
Chauncey.

H.M.Jr:

It was to the President.

White:

I told Mrs. Shanahan to bring it in in person, so I know she brought it, but it may

have been after you had gone, Miss Chauncey.
Chauncey:

I will check on it after I get back.

H.M.Jr:

Anything else, Harry?

White:

No, sir.

Graves:

I told you yesterday that Mr. Bruere had

been sick ever since he had been designated.

I thought perhaps you would like to sign a

note to him.
H.M.Jr:

Sure. He felt awfully badly about missing

out. I call him Henry.
Graves:

Ferdie spoke to me this morning of your

interest in our doing an opinion poll on the

bonds. That is something we have had under
discussion before. We have been in touch
with Hadley Cantrel up at Princeton who has

offered to do this thing, and if you would
like to have us go ahead, we can work it out.

H.M.Jr:

Ferdie Kuhn told me it had been going for
about three weeks.

155

- 26 Kuhn:

I was wrong on it, because I had seen the

questions which Hadley Cantrel had submitted

to us for revision, and I assumed the thing
was rolling, but Harold has brought me up
to date and is now bringing you up to date.
H.M.Jr:

Let me explain what I want, you see. I don't
know what - this is what I would like to get.

We are doing a number of things, you see, and
just like any commercial product - because

that is what the Gallup Poll started on, and
they did it for us on the baby bond thing.
They tested for us. I mean, we are doing
certain things. For instance, how many of
the public are we reaching by radio, and

after they listen to the radio, do they go

and buy a bond or a stamp? Do you see
what I mean? How many were influenced by
the President's talk? How many of them are
influenced by these posters, you see? How

many of them never heard of the thing at

all? And then if possible, if you could
do this, if it isn't too expensive, what

kind of people are we reaching on the radio?

I mean, is it the farmer, the banker, the

butcher, and the candlestick maker, or which

one of those people are we reaching and
which aren't we, and the same thing on the

posters. In other words, I would like the which of our efforts are resulting in sales,

and then what kind of people are buying and
what kind of people aren't we reaching at

all. I mean, that is the beginning that I

would like to have, do you see?
Graves:

Yes.

White:

Is that the type of question that the Gallup
Poll asks? I didn't think they asked that

kind.
H.M.Jr:

Harry, Dr. Gallup is associated with a com-

156

- 27 mercial advertising agency in New York.
White:

You have to pay for that, then.

H.M.Jr:

Sometimes we do, sometimes we don't.

Graves:

I don't think we will have to pay for it
if we will allow them to publish the results.

White:

Because Odegarde asked us to suggest some

questions, and we drew up a page of questions,

but they were entirely different. I didn't
think they would ask this kind.

H.M.Jr:

I was surprised when what's-his-name told me

last night that this was done, but he is

the vice president of some agency and his

business is when this agency is selling
Ivory Soap or Camels, to go out and test
the advertising to see whether it is good or

bad. Who they reach and who they don't.
Then when they find what they are not doing,

they change it and that is the way this business started; and from that got into public
opinion, but his business is bread and butter.
It isn't from the newspapers that he sells,
but he is serving these commercial advertisers
as to testing the kind of advertising, where

White:

H.M.Jr:

it is profitable and where it is not.
I didn't know that.

Yes. And you will find he is vice president
of - or president of - do you know which
agency he is connected with?

Kuhn:

H.M.Jr:

No.

But that is his business, and this other
thing is simply a by-product. I would imagine
if he broke even on that, he would figure

157

- 28 -

the publicity he gets is worth it, but I
think you will find his bread and butter
White:

comes from this commercial advertising.
I see.

Graves:

Our approach to this, as a matter of fact,

was made to the university and not Gallup.
H.M.Jr:

I am thinking of Gallup in the sense of a

man who is connected with commercial adver-

tising. I remember you asked Sloan on his

own. He took my ads and went out on the

street, and he said, "I think you would like

to know, Mr. Morgenthau, that your ads that
you are running in the Saturday Evening Post
are as well received and get as much results
as Ivory Soap." We classify them weekly,
advertisements that are as good as that, and

that is where I got the idea from. It isn't

any-White:

It floats.

H.M.Jr:

But he says there is no charge. "I was just
curious to know how good were your ads, so

I went out and tested them for you."

Graves:

H.M.Jr:

You would like us to go ahead with it?

Oh, I think it is terribly important. If

he doesn't want to do it, the man who does

it for Fortune--

Graves:

Donald Roper.

H.M.Jr:

I would rather have him do it.

Graves:

Rather have Roper do it?

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

158

- 29 Graves:

Wouldn't you think it might be wise to wait
a few weeks until this thing has taken hold

a little better? At this point, I think you--

H.M.Jr:

Until you get it organized. Ask their advice.
How soon after they start an advertising campaign do they begin to test?

Graves:

What I meant was that you get one reaction

today, and you might get entirely a different
reaction the 25th of this month.

H.M.Jr:

Well, it takes a while until you get the

correspondence. Certainly on the President's
talk and on the beginning you would get the -

you would get an answer on May 1.
Graves:

I thought it might be an answer that wouldn't

do us as much good.
H.M.Jr:

Try it. I am quite keen about it. So I mean

don't wait. Please start it, will you,

Harold?
Graves:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

And I would rather do it with Roper than I
would with Gallup.

White:

I don't think Chick Schwarz' bon mot should

go unheard. He says it is good for Ivory
Soap and it is just as good for baby's skin.

I think it is pretty good. Think about it.

Baby bonds are just as good-Gaston:

Ivory Soap is good for the baby's skin?

White:

It is terribly tough to explain a joke. I am
sorry.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am afraid the trouble is that it is

159

- 30 -

a dirty joke and it doesn't go well with

Ivory Soap.
White:

Delete the record.

Schwarz:

Ever since I have had children, I forget
about dirty jokes.

White:

If
it wasn't for dirt, Ivory Soap wouldn't
amount to much.

Thompson:

Mr. Sayre, the Philippine High Commissioner,
would like permission to appoint Stewart

McDonald, a member of the Processing Tax

Board of Review, as legal adviser to his
staff. We will probably be requested by

Mr. Doughton to fill the vacancy. I don't

know whether Mr. Sullivan has anyone in mind

or not, but I will talk to him.

Sullivan:

I don't know about that.

Thompson:

I tried to tell you last night.

H.M.Jr:

Don't let Bob Wagner know.

Sullivan:

I have to take care of my landlord.

H.M.Jr:

Who is that?

Sullivan:

Sayre.

H.M.Jr:

Oh! Anything else?

Thompson:

I would like to stay about 10 minutes.

H.M.Jr:

All right.

160
May 6 1941
2:52 P.M.

Operator:

The Postmaster General.

H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Frank

Walker:

Hello, fellow orator.

H.M.Jr:

How are you?

W:

All right, how're you?

H.M.Jr:

I didn't know when you were coming back or

I'd have called you.
W:

You came over very clearly, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

So did you.

W:

Yes. One can't tell themselves. You have to You were good.

H.M.Jr:
W:

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

You went over very nicely, Henry.

We got lots of compliments on the three of us.

W:

Did the speech in Des Moines work in without
any interruptions?

H.M.Jr:

Oh, it was right on the tick.

W:

H.M.Jr:
W:

H.M.Jr:

Your opening and then your introduction following
mine came very clearly out in Des Moines.

It was right on the tick.
Are you satisfied with the way it's going?

I think it's going fine; we've had to order

twenty million more of those books. I asked
reports yet I think everything is going fine.
They tell me that the post offices are doing
everything
thank
you. that we could ask for, for which I

you to order them. While we haven't had many

W:

Yes. They all seem to be interested out in the
field. I was in Des Moines; then I made the first

161

-2saleknow.
out in
you
H.M.Jr:
W:

Kansas City the next morning,

I know you did.

We have six and a half million in bonds
and
a million, one twenty in stamps up to
last night.

H.M.Jr:

Is that right?

W:

Yes,

H.M.Jr:

Well, I think it's fine. It's going to be

a long hard road, Frank - just for a day or
two, you know.

W:

H.M.Jr:

Well, I just thought I'd call up
I can't tell you how much I appreciate

your help.
W:

H.M.Jr:

Fine, Henry.
Thank you.

So long.

162
May 6, 1941
3:29 P.M.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Mr. Sproul.

H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Allan
Sproul:
H.M.Jr:

Hello, Mr. Secretary.
Hello, Allen?

S:

Yes,

H.M.Jr:
S:

H.M.Jr:
S:

What are you doing for a living?
Not much. I'm working for you, though.
Well, that's something.
I saw your statement in the paper this morning
that your reporting system wasn't very good.

H.M.Jr:

That's right.

S:

I wondered if we were falling down on the job
any place and could tighten up for you.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I tell you. If you don't mind talking

with Harold Graves, I think the fault is ours

S:

H.M.Jr:
S:

H.M.Jr:

because we haven't asked for what we wanted.
I see.

And I said so at my press conference.
Well,
also. we might have suggested something else

He put George Haas on it and they're working

and they got, as a matter of fact they just
brought in a telegram which either has or will
go out in the next ten minutes to Federal Reserves.

S:

H.M.Jr:

I see.

But I'd like to switch you over to Harold Graves
who is in charge of this campaign; but the fault
is not yours, it's on us because we didn't ask
for the information which we need.

S:

What are you proposing to do in the future on

-2-

163

information? These newspaper men are -

and some of the people in the market - well
the newspaper men of course will ride you
constantly for
H.M.Jr:

Well, what we are asking for, what we are

going to ask for in the telegram 18 that
Wednesday, up to Wednesday in each week,
that the Federal Reserve collect this stuff

for us, so that I can have it by the following

Monday.
S:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

See?

S:

I think that any oftener than that would be
out of the question; that 18 not from the
standpoint of doing it, but unnecessarily
keep the market on their qui vive as to what

happened yesterday and what's happening today.
H.M.Jr:

Once a week, that sound all right?

S:

I think that's plenty.

H.M.Jr:

And we'll try to do the same with the Post

Office.

S:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

But cut the week off on a Wednesday night

and try to get the information in here to

me by Monday.
S:

I think that makes a good program and once that's
been announced I think they'11 quit bothering

you for daily information, or after the post
offices, figures which really mean nothing.
H.M.Jr:

The fault 18 the Treasury's because we weren't
smart enough to ask for it; but everybody has
been rushed around here.

S:

Yes, sure.

H.M.Jr:

But no reflection on you.

S:

Well, I wanted to tighten up if we had slipped
any place.

H.M.Jr:

Well, as I say, the telegram either has or

-3-

164

will go out in the next ten minutes.
S:

H.M.Jr:

Fine.

Just a minute, I'11 switch you to Harold Graves.

S:

All right, thanks.

H.M.Jr:

Please.

Operator:

Operator.

H.M.Jr:

Hello, will you give Mr. Sproul to Mr. Harold

Operator:

Surely.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

Graves, please?

165 c
May 6, 1941
4:07 P.M.

H.M.Jr.:

Hello.

Operator:

MoReynolds

H.M.Jr.:

Hello.

William S.
McReynolds:

H.M.Jr.:
M:

How are you, sir?

Hello, you old so and so. How are you?
I'm pretty good, thank you.

H.M.Jr.:

Yes. That's what you say.

M.:

Yes.

H.M.Jr.

How are you?

M.:

I feel fine.

H.M.Jr.:

Good.

M.:

Swell.

H.M.Jr.:

Want to borrow some money?

M.:

No.

H.M.Jr.:

Be good for you.

M.:

I want to congratulate you on your assistant's
speech on the radio last night. I thought he
did a swell job.

H.M.Jr.:

Didn't he do a good job?

M.:

It was a good speech too.

H.M.Jr.:

He's a good man.

M.:

You bet he's good.

H.M.Jr.:

All of these ex-post office inspectors are good.
What I called you for was Bishop Wright, the

M.:

president of this negro university --

166
2H.M.Jr.:

He's too late, we got two other negros already.

M.:

Oh, you have.

H.M.Jr.:
M.:

Yes.

All he wanted to do was to just put himself
in line to give any help he could on your
bond compaign.

H.M.Jr.:

M.:

For your information, we checked this fellow
with the Spingarn organization.
Yes.

M.:

He doesn't check too good, Mac.
Doesn't check.

H.M.Jr.:

No, we got --

M.:

I didn't know anything about him except he

H.M.Jr.:

H.M.Jr.:

got through that university out there -Well, we got two negros who are really first

M.:

Yes, I knew you would want somebody and before

H.M.Jr.:

No. He's been running a regular campaign on

M.:

Oh, he has.

H.M.Jr.:

Yes. I suggest that he help OPM. (Laughs)

class.

I'd send him any place else --

it.

All right, Mac. Hope to see you soon.

M.:

OK.

H.M.Jr.:

Take care of yourself.

M.:

Thank you.

H.M.Jr.:

Good bye.

DEPOSITS IN TREASURER'S ACCOUNT FROM SALE 0. NITED STATES SAVINGS BONDS (ALL SERIES)

(In Thousands of Dollars)
(Based on Telegraphic Reports)

TOTAL
TO

MAY 1

Treasury

58

Boston

23

New York

MAY 2

MAY 3

MAY 5

MAY 6

MAY 7

MAY 8

MAY 9

MAY 10

DATE

182

36

31

30

177

37

2,127

1,959

4,323

511

2,128

683

1,336

1,292

5,950

Philadelphia

201

182

216

246

1,121

1,966

Cleveland

955

246

942

1,158

2,467

5.768

Richmond

163

234

289

292

1,021

1,999

Atlanta

121

305

174

1,317

523

2,440

Chicago

457

634

740

1,233

585

3,649

St. Louis

534

804

1,822

1,538

505

5,203

Minneapolis

150

567

73

238

569

1,597

Kansas City

695

876

388

863

827

3,649

Dallas

271

157

429

271

824

1,952

San Francisco

312

572

534

687

259

2,364

4,451

6,909

6,363

11,337

11,982

11,360

17,723

29,060

41,042

TOTAL

Oumulative Total 4,451

27

168
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE

Secretary Morgenthau
FROM

May 6, 1941.

J. J. O'Connell, Jr.
For your information
The regular weekly meeting of the Price Administration
Committee was held in Mr. Henderson's office at 11 o'clock
this morning. All the agencies which are members of the
Committee were represented. Mr. Knudsen was there for

the first time.

Mr. Henderson told the Committee that he is going

to appear before the Ways and Means Committee tomorrow

morning to discuss some phases of the tax bill. It is

apparently his intention to take exception to some of the
Treasury's excise tax proposals, on the ground that they
bear too heavily on the small consumer. He also feels
that the heaviest excise taxes should be imposed upon
articles the consumption of which we wish to curtail
as an aid to the defense program. For example, he would
have a high excise tax on automobiles, frigidaires, oil

burners and other similar articles in order that con-

sumer expenditures might be diverted into lines which

do not cut across the defense program so directly. He
pointed out the desirability of curtailing the production
of these articles in order to conserve aluminum, steel,
and other articles needed for defense. He mentioned
the fact that there will probably be a shortage in fuel
oil next Fall and that curtailment in the production and
sale of oil burners would be one way of anticipating such
a shortage.

As has happened at other meetings, the problem of
ocean transportation was adverted to time and time again.
The representative of the Federal Loan Agency stated that

efforts are being made to have all trans-Pacific ship-

ments, both government and private, unload at West Coast

169

Secretary Morgenthau,

2.

ports, inasmuch as doing this would save thirty to

thirty-five days for a ship carrying material the

ultimate destination of which is in the East. It

was pointed out that diverting ocean travel to

land travel via the railroads will probably result
in a bottleneck in the railroads themselves, since
they are admittedly not in condition at this time to

handle greatly expanded traffic.

Commissioner Pike made an interesting suggestion

with reference to the transportation problem. He
suggested that in a period of four or five months pipe
lines, both for oil and natural gas, could be constructed from the oil fields in Texas and Oklahoma

to eastern points. It was his idea that by so doing

you would alleviate several pressing problems, among
them being the ocean and land transportation problems.

He pointed out that to the extent oil and gasoline
move by pipe line they lighten the burden on tankers
and the railroads, and that to the extent natural
gas is piped to the industrial centers of the East,
it reduces the necessity for transporting coal and
at the same time utilizes a natural resource which is
at present going to waste at the rate of two billion
cubic feet per day. Apparently the main resistence

to such a proposal comes from the railroad people and

the coal people. The subject did not get beyond a
very general discussion.

Reference was made to the fact that rubber consumption
is up about 50 per cent over normal and that while we have

an adequate supply for a reasonable period, it will not
last long unless consumption is curtailed or productive
capacity for synthetic rubber developed. Here again
the problem is largely one of transportation inasmuch
as there is plenty of rubber in the Far East available

at a reasonable price, if the shipping facilities were
only available to bring it here. Mr. Knudsen stated

170
Secretary Morgenthau,

3.

that in his opinion every rubber company in the country
should have a plant for the production of synthetic
rubber. He expressed some impatience about what has

been done in this regard so far, referring to it as
being a "miniature" program.

Mr. Henderson also reported on progress being made

in connection with the textile industry. He said they
in all probability a schedule of prices will be worked

had held meetings with the cotton yarn people and that

out and suggested in the near future. He expressed

himself as believing that the price situation in that
industry has eased somewhat.

Before the meeting I talked with Mr. Henderson
about the problem of channeling the flow of capital

funds. I told him what we have done in this regard

and showed him a copy of the Executive Order which

was drafted last month. I explained to him that we

were anxious that he be completely informed 8.8 to all
this and that we did not want any crossing of wires.
He expressed himself as being entirely willing to go
along with us, and indicated that he had not made any

plans to move into that field. He did say that he

could see no present necessity for affirmative steps
to control the flow of capital funds, inasmuch as there

is no shortage of capital. I pointed out that it did

not seem to me the problem was so simple as it is
important that capital funds not be expended in ways

that cut across the defense effort, by using either
men or materials needed for the defense effort.
He said of course that he realized that and would discuss
the matter with me later.

Joseph

MEMORANDUM
British Supply Council
FROM

Mrs. Helen S. Klotz
TO

Compliments of Mr. E.N. Gray

171
5/6/41

122

STATEMENT NO. 13

AIRCRAFT SHIPPED TO U. K. & OVERSEAS COMMANDS
By Sea

during week
DESTINATION

ASSEMBLY
POINT

ending

April 12
1941

By Air
during weel
ending
May 3
1941

8

TISS

omahawk

M. E.

Takoradi

U. K.

U. K.

-

U. K.

-

15

-

OLIDATED

-24

atalina

U. K.

Catalina

F. E.

1

(via. Gander)
1

(via. Bermuda)
F. E.

-

1

(via. San Diego)

OUGLAS

U. K.

U. K.

Maryland I

M. E.

Takoradi

Maryland I

M. E.

Alexandria

U. K.

U. K.

Boston III

10

-

LENN MARTIN
5

5

OCKHEED

Hudson III
Hudson V

fudson V

Hudson V

U. K.

-

1

-

1

(via. Gander)
U. K.

(via. Gander)

U. K.

U. K.

New Zealand

New Zealand

3

New Zealand

New Zealand

27

36

-

-

NORTH AMERICAN

Harvard II

TOTALS

British Air Commission

May 6, 1941

101

-

5

173
GRAY

LS

BERLIN

Dated May 6, 1941

Rec'd 11:10 a.m.

Secretary of State
Washington

1741, May 6, 9 a.m.
My 1273, May 5, 9 a.m.
FOR TREASURY FROM HEATH.

According to the Reichabank's statement for April 30
investment holdings totaled 16187 million marks (commer-

cial and treasury bills 15645; Eligible securities 22;
collateral loans 32; and miscEllaneous securities 488)
compared with 15123 million marks on April 23 and 15775

million marks on March 31. During the first three WEEKS
of April the Reichsbank's investment holdings had
decreased by only 652 million marks, whereas there had

been an increase of 1402 million marks during the last
WEEK of March so that a normal increase during the last

WEEK of April resulted in a new record for total investment holdings. MiscEllanEous assets also increased during
the last WEEK of April from 1015 to 1160 million marks
compared with 1246 million marks on March 31.

The circulation of Reichsbank notes reached a new
record of 14689 million marks as compared with 13558
million

174

-2- 1741, May 6, 9 a.m. from Berlin.
million marks on April 23 and 14188 million marks on

March 31 which had also been a record figure. Sight
deposits stood at 2006 million marks on April 30
compared with 2055 million marks a WEEK Earlier and 2127

million marks on March 31.

(*)

During April there has thus/and note circulation
than in recent months. Note circulation increased by
501 million marks during April as compared with an
average monthly increase of roughly 170 million marks
in the preceding twelve months, 282 million marks in
February and 212 million marks in March.
MORRIS

WSB

(*) Apparent omission

175
C

0

P

Y

PLAIN
TOKYO

Dated May 6, 1941

Rec'd 2:20 p.m.

Secretary of State,
Washington.

645. May 6. 10 p.m.

The Cabinet Information Board issued this afternoon
the following announcement regarding the Convention of
Establishment and Navigation and the agreement concerning

customs tariff, trade, and methods of payment signed at
4 p.m. today by Foreign Minister Matsuoka and Ambassador
Hajime Matsumiya representing Japan and Ambassador Arsene

Henry and Chief Delegate Rene Robin representing France:
"Contents of the Convention and the Agreement:
The Convention of Establishment and Navigation

provides for the reciprocal treatment of nationals and

vessels of the two parties. It stipulates that Japan and
French Indochina will reciprocably accord national treatment in the main or the most-favored-nation treatment as
occasion demands concerning the entry, the establishment,
the acquisition and possession of movable and immovable
property, the exercise of commerce and manufacturing

industry, the imposition of taxes of various kinds and the
treatment

176
-2-

treatment of companies. Concerning vessels of the two

countries, it also provides that they will be treated
in principle on an equal footing.
An agreement concerning the customs tariff, trade and
the method of payment is a voluminous one consisting of
thirty articles and annexed documents, and contains the

following provisions:
Regarding the customs tariff, the two parties agree
to accord mutually the most-favored-nation treatment.
Besides, French Indochina agrees to afford the advantage

of the exemption of customs tariff or the reduction of the
existing minimum customs tariff to the principal products

of Japan and to levy the minimum tariff on all other
Japanese products: and Japan, in turn, agrees to accord the

privileges of favorable customs tariff to the principal
products of Indochina.

As regards trade, provisions have been made, with a

view to increasing the trade between the two countries

for the exports to Japan of rice, maize, coal, minerals
and other principal products of French Indochina, and for
the export to French Indochina of textiles, other manufactured articles and miscellaneous products of Japan.
With regard to the method of payment, commercial
payment between Japan and French Indochina is based on the

principle of compensation, and its settlement is made in
the yen and the plastre directly through the intermediary
of

177

the Yokohama Specie Bank and the Bank of Indochina,
of dispensing, thereby, with the exchange of foreign currency. favor

French Indochina agrees to afford special
Moreover,
by Japan. with respect to the payment for Indochina rice purchased

agreement of views has also been reached with
An to the questions of admission of Japanese commercial in

regard into the federation of importers and exporters
firms Indochina, the participation of Japanese capital French in
French agricultural, mining and hydraulic concessions in

Indochina and the institution of periodical economic
conference for the examination of general economic
questions between Japan and French Indochina."
GREW

RR

CopY:bj:5-14-41

178

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON

In reply refer to
EA 811.20 Defense (M)/1862

May 6, 1941

The Secretary of State presents his compliments to
the Honorable the Secretary of the Treasury and encloses

a copy of a paraphrase of telegram no. 45 dated April 30,
1941 from the American Consulate, Saigon, regarding a

shipment of rubber destined for Europe via Russia, which

is reported to have been paid for in United States dollars.
Enclosure:

No. 45. April 30,
from Saigon.

179
0

0

P

Y

PARAPHRASE OF RECEIVED
FROM: American Consulate, Saigon.

DATE: April 30, 1941, noon.
NO. : 45.
Please see this Consulate's 39 of March 18, 4 p.m.

Reliable information has been received to the effect
that the Japanese merchant ship Saigon Maru (which is now

at this port) is taking on a cargo of six thousand tons of
rubber which is believed to be destined for Europe via
the U.S.S.R. According to my informants this shipment

is being paid for in U.S. dollars, which payment has
already been received. Latest reports would indicate
that Union Commerciale Indo-Chinoise et Africaine is
the exporter.
FLOOD

EA:MSG

180
Buenos Aires, May 6, 1941

No. 2372

Sent by airmail May 8.
VISIT OF WARREN L. PIERSON TO BUENOS AIRES:
UNITED STATES LOANS TO ARGENTINA

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

The Honorable

The Secretary of State,
Washington.
Sir:

I have the honor to inform the Department that Mr. Warren L.

Pierson, President, of the Export-Import Bank, arrived in Buenos Aires
by plane from Chile on the afternoon of Saturday, April 19. and departed for Brazil on May 2. On the morning of April 26 Mr. Pierson
left for Asuncion and returned here on the afternoon of Thursday,

April 24, the return arrival of his plane having been delayed some
24 hours due to bad weather.

A luncheon was arranged at the Embassy on Thursday April 24 for

Mr. and Mrs. Pierson, to which the Minister of Finance, the Presidents
of the Bank of the Nation and the Central Bank, the Under Minister of
Finance and others were invited.

On the afternoon of April 25 I accompanied Mr. Pierson on a visit
to the Minister of Finance. The call was made at Dr. Acevedo's request.
Prior to our talk with the Minister we were received by the Under

181
-2-

Minister. Dr. Irigoyen told Mr. Pierson that their purpose in
inviting him to come was to explain the situation in which the
Government was placed with regard to the loans and credits negotiated

by Dr. Prebisch during his visit to Washington. He stated that,
as Mr. Pierson was aware, owing to the deadlock in the Chamber of

Deputies arising out of the refusal to consider pending legislation
presented to the extraordinary session by the Government, approval
of the loans by the Congress here had not yet been secured. As the
extraordinary session had now only a few days to run, it seemed al-

most certain that no action would be forthcoming during this session
and that they would have to await such action as Congress might take
in the regular session which would probably be convened about May 15
next.

Dr. Irigoyen said that the Government had on April 1 last
separated the Washington loans from the budget by embodying them in
a special bill which had been presented to Congress (see Embassy's
despatch No. 1874 of January 27. 1941 and No. 2371 of May 5. 1941;

presunably authorization of a blanket nature is still in the budget
bill introduced in Congress last December). While it was true that
the Government hoped that favorable action by Congress might be

forthcoming, he and the Minister felt they should profit by Mr.
Pierson's presence in Buenos Aires to discuss with him what procedure

it might be possible to follow in the event approval by Congress of
the loan was not eventually forthcoming. Dr. Irigoyen appeared to

understand that so far as the 50 million dollar stabilization loan was

182
-3concerned, it would be difficult for our Government to make this
available without Congressional here, but he wondered whether the

60 million dollar credit negotiated with the Export-Inport Bank could
not perhaps be made available to then without such congressional

approval. either by governmental decree or in some other way. Mr.

Pierson said that he would of course have to study this, but
reminded Dr. Irigoyen that the contract signed by Dr. Prebisch with
the Bank provided specifically for congressional approval. Any change
from this procedure, he said, would mean drawing up a new contract

that would have to be approved by the Board of the Export-Import Bank.

This would present difficulties, particularly as there was now a new
Board composed of different members from those who comprised the

Board at the time the contract was signed. While Dr. Irigoyen seemed

to appreciate this point he stated that, as regards the 20 million
dollar credit previously granted by the Export-Import Bank, no approval
by the Argentine Congress was envisaged. Mr. Pierson's reply was that
while it was true the funds might have been made available to the Bank

prior to congressional approval here, such approval was ultimately
envisaged. In any event, he added, in the case of the 60 million
dollar credit congressional approval had been stipulated and requested
by the Argentine Government and he felt that now to proceed without
securing such approval might well be interpreted in Argentina as

intervention in their internal affairs. I supported Mr. Pierson's
position and reminded Dr. Irigoyen that as influential a journal as
LA PRENSA had repeatedly insisted in its editorial columns that

183
Argentine congressional approval must be forthcoming to make the

credit legal. Dr. Irigoyen promptly acknowledged this; in fact, he
added that LA PRENSA had even questioned the authority of the Central

Bank to negotiate such a loan without prior authorisation of the
Congress here. He also readily admitted that if we were now to
proceed without such approval LA PRENSA would undoubtedly come out

very strongly against such action.

Dr. Irigoyen then raised the point whether it might not be
possible to negotiate a new loan made more directly to the Argentine
Government, e.g. through the Bank of the Nation. Both Mr. Pierson
and I agreed that aside from the inevitable delays which would

result from any such procedure, it would create an unfortunate
impression in the United States if we had to begin again after the
long negotiations that had already taken place in Buenos Aires
last October and in Washington last December and January.
We then went in to see the Minister, when such the same ground
was gone over. Dr. Acevedo repeated many of the same arguments used

by Dr. Irigoyen. He agreed with Mr. Pierson and myself that the
best procedure would certainly be for the Government to make every

effort to secure congressional approval of the loans in their
present form and said that he still hoped that this night be
accomplished, adding that he and only brought the matter up in the

event that things did not work out along these lines. He seened

to feel that in any event there would be little hope of congressional
action before June and possibly July. The ordinary session of
Congress will probably extend vell beyond even this latter date, but

184

if by July or August they had not been able to put the bill through,
then, the Minister seemed to feel, there would be little hope for it.
Mr. Pierson mentioned to the Minister that considerable surprise
had been caused in Washington by the failure of the Argentine Govern-

ment to secure ratification of the loan; that comment had even
appeared in certain of the newspapers in the United States to the
effect that they had understood that Argentina needed the money and

that the matter was an urgent one and therefore, not perhaps being

aware of the internal difficulties here, they could not understand
why the efforts of the United States Government and the Export-Import
Bank in making the funds available had not been availed of.

I said to the Minister that, while not wishing to seem to
intervene in their internal affairs, I wondered whether it would perhaps
be possible for the Government to have a talk with the leaders of the
Radical Party in Congress with a view to having them agree to consider

the Washington loans on a different basis from other legislation.

It could, I thought, be pointed out that the negotiation of the loans
had created a favorable impression in the United States, and we hoped
in Argentina, as evidence of the desire of the United States Government

to give practical application to the Good Neighbor policy in helping
Argentina in a difficult emergency situation and that continued delay
here in Argentina in acting on this could not but cause unfavorable
comment in the United States. The Minister seemed to feel that it
might be possible to do something along these lines, particularly as
the leader of the Radical Party, Dr. Marcelo Alvear, favored the loans
and seemed disposed to lend his assistance to carrying the transaction

-6-

185

through. Up to the present, however, he had not been able to persuade

the more intransigeant members of his party to adopt a similar attitude.
The conversation closed with assurances given by Mr. Pierson that
be would study the matter but holding out no encouragement that it would
be possible for the Bank to agree to make funds available without the
procedure envisaged having been adhered to.

Since our talk with the Minister and Dr. Irigoyen I have received
a visit from Senor Damonte Taborda, Secretary General of the Radical

party and one of the principal representatives of the Party in Congress.
Dr. Damonte Taborda mentioned the question of the Washington loans and

expressed the opinion that he and his colleagues in the Chamber of
Deputies would probably agree to consider a bill approving the loans

at the forthcoming regular session. He indicated, however, that
certain restrictions as to how the money would be used might be insisted
upon by them: In other words, they were not disposed to give the Government free rein in using the funds in any manner in which they might
wish to employ them.

On April 30, at a call at the Ministry of Finance, Mr. Pierson was
1/ given a memorandum in English marked "Strictly Confidential", a copy

of which is enclosed. The memorandum outlines the difficulties confronting the Argentine Government in obtaining Congressional authoriza.
tion of the loans and states that although the Government still hopes

that Congress will take favorable action, it must in the circumstances
"be ready to face the alternative of not being able to secure the
approval of the Government guarantee to the loans". Continuing, the
memorandum states that "it seems unnecessary to point out that the need

186
7

for dollar credits is today more pressing than last December and it

is also unnecessary to add that it will be increasingly so in the
foreseeable future." It then enumerates several legal powers which
it declares would enable the Executive to contract extensive loans
without the specific authorisation of Congress.
Respectfully yours,

Norman Armour.

Inclosure - As stated.
Qn. 851
Natna

eh:bj:copy

187

(Enclosure No. 1 in despatch No. 2372)
MEMORANDUM

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

During the last few months the Executive has been unable to
secure cooperation from Congress even for the enactment of the most

essential bills, 1.0. the Budget and the authorisation of the Government guarantee to the 110 million dollar credits granted by the
Secretary of the Treasury and the Eximbank to the Central Bank.

It must be clearly understood that this attitude of Congress

is not the result of any particular policy regarding those credits
but arises wholly out of a very complex political situation, chiefly
related to the Provincial elections of Santa Fo and Mendoza. On the

contrary, the leaders of the opposition and the entire radical party
representation in the Chamber of Deputies are on record in favour of

external credits. As for the Senate there is no problem.
The Congress is showing an increasing tendency to cooperate

and the Executive is making every effort to foster that mood. A
special bill has been introduced before the Chamber of Deputies re-

questing authorisation to guarantee the dollar credits and there is
a possibility that approval may be obtained in the ordinary sessions
beginning May the 15th. In any case the bill would not become law

until sometime later towards the end of June. But we are far from

certain that action will be taken.

188

-In the circumstances we must be ready to face the alternative
of not being able to secure the approval of the Government guarantee
to the loans.

It seems unnecessary to point out that the need for dollar
credits is today more pressing than last December and it is also un-

necessary to add that it will be increasingly so in the foresee, ble
future. It is the purpose of the Government to explore every possi-

bility of obtaining dollar credits using the existing authorisations
by Congress or on the basis of the General Powers of the Ministry of
Finance.

By virtue of several laws (Laws 12.576; 12.139, arts. 8 and 9:
12.345, art. 62; 12.150, art. 42; 12.574, art. 57; 11.378; 12.511 and
others) the Government has had for some years legal authorization to

issue nearly 300 million pesos of domestic or foreign obligations.
At the time these authorizations were granted, the market not
being receptive, "pre-financing" bills and appropriations from exchange profits reserves were used as a temporary means of obtaining

funds. The Government has legal authority to issue foreign or domes-

tic obligations to replenish the exchange profits fund and retire
the above mentioned bills.

There is another standing legal authorisation. Under the general
powers of the Ministry of Finance the Executive can issue abroad short
term notes in domestic and foreign currencies. This power has been

189

-

exercised several times in the New York market and there were upwards

of 60 million dollars of six months obligations outstanding at a
given moment. These notes were issued to commercial banks generally

as a means of "pre-financing" while the market got ready for a public
offering. The proceeds were chiefly used for paying for necessary

imports. There is not any statutory limitation to these powers as
to the amounts to be borrowed abroad on these notes.

The legal powers outlined above would enable the Executive

to arrange external credits without specific authorisation from
Congress.

Copy: jpt

W

190

or TELEMISM

PHON: American Babasay, Duenes Areas, Augustine.
DATED: May 9. . D.m.
NO:

409

Recently there has been observed on increasing

influx of dollars seeking investment in Argentina.
A report from the exchange market states that there
was an inflow of 14 million dollars on May 4 and

11 million on May 5. Investigations are being made to
determine the source and the volume of these transform

during the past few weeks and a report will be forwarded
to the Department.

ARMOUS

RALJOH

S

191

MEMORANDUM

May 6, 1941

To:

Mr. Harry L. Hopkins

From: Oscar Cox

For your information:

Annexed is a letter which I just received on
the Middle Eastern situation from Rifat Tirana. Tirana
is presently working for the Federal Reserve Bank in
New York and apparently knows a good bit about the situation
in the Middle East.

(Signed )

OSC:ahb

Cox

544 East 86th Street,

192

May 3, 1941.

Dear Mr. Cox,

As the situation in the Middle East threatens to become very
am addressing to you certain suggestions in the hope that you

them
on
to
the
are
on
my own personal knowledge my own

might dangerous pass I right of the quarters. Middle East These and the suggestions Arab world and based

instinctive reactions as a Moslem to certain current problems. They are

made in the spirit of trying to help in this particularly acute and little
understood problem.

The Government and people of the United States occupy an important
place in the minds and hearts of Arab peoples because they are the only

great nation that has had no ax to grind in that part of the world. Some of
the Arab nationalists, like the Syrians, also remember the efforts of persons
like Charles Crane to help them gain their independence. I would therefore
say that the best method of approach is through the good offices of the
United States Government and citisens.

One way of handling the Iraqia is to cause them some trouble on
the Kurdistan borders. The Kurds have been persecuted by Turks and Iraqis
alike but there is no reason why a good agent of the United States Government,
should not be able to win over the sympathies and active collaboration of
this hardy mountainous race.

The second method of approach is through Saoudi Arabia, particularly
King Ibn Sacud himself. Saoudi Arabia and its present leaders are held in
high esteem by the Moslem world, particularly those sects such as the Kurds
who are drawn to them by the Puritanical religion and practices of Ibn Sacud
and his followers. You will remember that the principal difference dividing
Ibn Sacud from the British has been the establishment of dynasties in Iraq
and Trans-Jordan drawn from King Feisal's family. King Feisal himself and
Eair Abdullah of Trans-Jordan have always been persona non grata

with Saoudi Arabia. In view of the fact that King Feisal's line has about
exhausted its usefulness to the British, and in view of the fact that Emir
Abdullah has not an enviable reputation, it should be possible to win doubt over

Ibn Sacud by yielding to him on this minor problem. Ibn Saoud has no Ibn
many American friends. As trouble might also be expected from Yemen,
Sacud is probably the best person to be entrusted with the forestalling British of

such
that
might
be
to renounce for a small

King Farouk
of Caliph
futuregeneral,
leader
and
to the
Egypt the
of do
not perhaps
appeal Farouk's
trouble. secretly A further any concession support movement required which is aims Islam. for at the making

loose living, Europeanisation, and the Egyptians in modes

Moalem masses who are on the whole Puritanical in their beliefs and
of living.

of equal importance is the whole Zionist question. For the Zionists at this

in England and in this country to continue discussion of this problem This
moment is the best way of playing into the hands of the German Nasis.

193
2

is true not only with respect to the young Arab nationalists but also
important sections of the Arab and Moslem communities throughout the

world. I think that President Roosevelt is probably the best person
who can hush up or suspend for the entire duration of the war, active

or passive, Zionist propaganda speeches and clamor. This suggestion
is not motivated by any animosity towards Zionism; it derives exclusively

from a desire to suggest help for the solution of a very difficult

problem.

While on this subject it might be well to suggest too that
it is high time that the British Government should give up trying to

exercise control and suasion over the Moslem world through such nonrespected figures as the Agha Khan of India and other Moslem leaders
in London. These have a very small following.

in view of the possibility that troubles in Iraq might become
magnified into a Jihad - religious war - it seems indicated that both
the United States Government and people should try to proclaim, Appublicly

and privately, their determination to see the liberation of the Arab
and Moslem world from foreign rule both during and after the war.

The British are not in a position to do this convincingly as most Arabs
remember what happened to the promises made by Lawrence of Arabia.

I hope you will give this matter your keen and urgent attention.

Very sincerely yours,
(Signed) Rifat Tirana.
R. Tirana.

194
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 6, 1941

Secretary Morgenthau
FROM

Ferdinand Kuhn, Jr.

You asked yesterday about "I Am An American

Day". This will be observed throughout the country
on May 18 as a sort of graduation day for all those
who became citizens during the past twelve months.

There will be a meeting or other observance in every
city.

In Washington, the meeting will be held in
the Departmental Auditorium on the evening of May 18.
Mrs. Henry Grattan Doyle will be Chairman. Among the

speakers will be Solicitor General Biddle and Archibald
MacLeish.

F.K.

195
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 6, 1941.
TO

FROM

Secretary's Files
Mr. Kuhn

The attached editorial made amends in some ways

for a preceding article of which the Secretary had
complained.

F.K.

NEW YORK TIMES - April 25, 1941

196

EVERY ONE MUST HELP

If the Treasury's proposals for increased taxation left much to be destred, the revisions of those proposals
suggested by Congressional tax experts

were even more lacking in the political
courage and sense of reality which the

situation calls for. Following the
Treasury's lead in failing to provide
any broadening of the tax base or to
open up any new sources of revenue,
the Congressional experts want to reluce the load on incomes in the middle

brackets, still further jack up taxes in
the higher brackets, and make up the
deficiency by boosting gifts and in
heritance taxes, raising existing excises

and levying new luxury and nuisance

taxes. It is typically of the pattern
that seeks to avoid laying visible taxes
where the votes are most numerous.

In luminous contrast to these proposals were the general principles laid

down by Secretary of the Treasury
Morgenthau in his statement yesterday

before the House Ways and Means
Committee.

Mr. Morgenthau set forth four ob
jectives of the new tax bill. They are
To pay for a reasonable proportion of
our expenditures; to provide that all
sections of the people shall bear their
fair share of the burden; to help mobilize our resources for defense by reduc-

ing the amount of money that the pub-

lic can spend for comparatively less
important things: and to prevent a
general price rise by keeping the volume of purchasing power from outrunning production.

That is an excellent statement of
the objectives should be. But, ex

for the first

to for a

what cept revenue pay point, the part raising of exil a

penditures, neither the Treasury's sug-

gestions For, still less, the Congressional revisions measure up to the
goal. The failure to broaden the income

tax base ducks the second objective
laid down by Mr. Morgenthau- that all
should bear a

throws upon
den. sections It grave
part doubt realizing of the bur- the the
likelihood
of effectively
two others, namely the reduction of
spending for non-defense goods and
the prevention of a price rise. The additional purchasing power that is being
pumped out by Government defense
spending will flow strongly into the

hands of income groups not touched by

direct taxes and those groups will
spend that money.

To frame a tax bill under existing
conditions that shrinks from laying
even a small direct tax upon the overwhelming majority of the people is to
place far too low an estimate upon the

character of that people. As Mr. Morgenthau said, "The job before us is so

big that all the American people must

help to carry it out in proportion to
their ability to pay." He has given
fine statement of the principles that
should govern the framing of this tax
bill. Let Congress and the Treasury
measure up to the standards he has set.

COPY
TREASURY DEPARTMENT

197

INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE April 24, 1941
TO

FROM

Ferdinand Kuhn, Jr.
Secretary Morgenthau

Please talk to me today about the tax
editorial in the New York Times. I think maybe
we ought to write a letter to them and tell them

that if they think our tax bill is so lousy, I
raise three and a half billion dollars additional

would like to have them give me a plan how to
in taxes.

198

in

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 6, 1941

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
TO

Secretary Morgenthau

FROM Mr. Viley

In the course of our work we have from time to time come across
indications that Nazis are employed in key positions in various air-

plane plants in this country. In general FBI takes the view that it

has no jurisdiction over such employment and refers any information
it say have to MID or ONI on the theory that it is the concern of the
department on whose order airplanes are being manufactured. FBI's

view is that it has no power to deal directly with the employers in
these cases and that it will not, as a matter of policy, interfere in
the employer-employee relationship. Presumably MID or ONI as the case

may be will, in view of its contract relations with the manufacturer,

insist upon safeguarding of government secrets, prevention of danger of

sabotage, etc.

In view of the fact that Coast Guard is in a position similar to
that of MID and ONI with respect to plants in which planes are manufactured for Coast Guard it may be that you will want to consider
whether the Treasury should not also give closer attention to the employment of Nazis insuch airplane factories.

Jaw

199
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

TO

DATE May 6. 1941

Secretary Morgenthau

FROM Mr. Viley

We have just been informed by FBI that between February 24, 1941 and
May 6, 1941 the Banco di Napoli Trust Company withdrew in cash from the
Corn Exchange Bank $2, 727,500, mostly in currency of small denominations,

the serial numbers of which cannot be traced. It appears that in order to
prevent detection transfers are made from the various Italian accounts
at Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, and Irving, to the Banco di Napoli
Trust Commany which in turn pays out cash from its till. Between April 1
and April 12, 1941, almost daily large cash withdrawals were made from the

Banco di Napoli Trust Company by the Embassy and New York Consulate, totaling

$924,000, and between April 21 and April 26, inclusive, similar cash with
drewals were made totaling $424,000, making a grand total of $1,348,000.

No information was available for the period April 12 to April 21, inclusive.

The

200
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 6, 1941

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
TO

Secretary Morgenthau

FROM

Mr. Wiley

Appended are the three memoranda which you requested at our conference.

Enc. 3

and
w

201
RUECKWANDERER MARKS

Between September 1, 1936, and March 14, 1941 (our latest date), the
German government has raised $13,905,560.53 by the sale of so-called Rueckwanderer marks to some 7,000 or more persons of German extraction. The dol-

lare in question, which, in most cases, represent the life savings of Ger-

ann-American lower and middle-class people, are placed in the accounts of
the German Goldiskontbank at the Chase and the Bank of Manhattan and form

part of official German dollar assets in the United States. The "purchasers"

of these Rueckwanderer marks receive for these dollars the promise of the
German government to pay marks at the rate of 4.10 in Germany upon the re-

sigration of the purchasers to Germany -- i. e., after the war.

The Trensury first brought this matter to the attention of FBI in October, 1940. FBI has made A very thorough and intensive investigation, has
traced each of the thousands of applications, has shown the involvement in
this business of the German Consuls and the highly-suspect German "travel
agencies" established throughout the country, and has, it seems, recommended

to the Attorney General a grand jury investigation with a view to prosecution
for violation of the Neutrality and Johnson Acts. The Treasury has given to

FBI and to the Attorney General it s opinion that the Rueckwanderer mark busi-

ness constitutes a violation of the letter and the spirit of the foregoing

statutes. However, in spite of constant prodding by FBI and to some extent
by the Treasury, and although the matter has been before them for about six
months, the persons charged with the decision on this matter in the Department
of Justice have reached no conclusion; in fact, there have been intimations
that they are not willing to undertake grand jury investigation. for reasons

which do not appear evident to us.

The value of P grand jury investigation with e view to prosecution in

these cases would seem to be great and FBI officials have always stressed

this aspect of the case. A grand jury investigation would give us power to issue
submoenes for information not now available, because FBI has no submoens power

in its own preliminary investigation, and would disclose the participation of
German consular officials in this business, since it is an essential part of

each Fueckwanderer mark transaction that the German Consul shall issue a certifi-

cate to the effect that the applicant is entitled to re-migrate to Germany
(that is, that he is an Aryen, etc.). A grand jury investigation could also
go into the use of inheritances and royalties -- two other major sources of
dollar balances here. Incidentally, FBI has already found that some of the
applicants for Rueckwanderer marks are employe d in National Defense work.

General freezing of German assets in this country would tie up the
balances still remaining in official German accounts
whether derived from
To the extent,
Sheekwanderer the marks or from other sources. however, States under that
Germans would be permitted to expend money in the United

general freezing licenses, the Bueckwanderer mark racket, as well as similar
rackets, could conceivably continue to operate.

202

GERMAN FOOD PACKAGE SITUATION

Totalitarian countries have raised dollars in this country by
inducing persons in the United States to feed their relatives in
countries under totalitarian control. This business seems to have

been originally developed by the Russians but the Germans have ex-

loited it even more thoroughly. German travel agencies, and corporations specifically set up for such business, have taken dollars in
the United States upon the promise to deliver packages of food to persons in Germany. It is clear that these food packages are not shipped
through the British blockede and that if packages are actually delivered,
they contain food already under German rationing control. Necessarily

the cost to the German Government for this food may have no necessary
market relation to the dollar payments made in the United States.

Between July 1, 1939 and March 31, 1941, deposits in the accounts
of the major food package companies in this country, monitored by FBI,

have totaled $12,601,395.03. The subject is under active investigation.
We have been informed by FBI that the Criminal Division of the
Department of Justice has ruled that the food package business does not

involve a violation of either the Neutrality Act or the Agents of Foreign
Principals Registration Act. It does not appear, however, that the Attorney General has been asked to rule whether this business involves a

violation of the Johnson Act. In any event, it is not believed that the
lawyers in the Department of Justice who considered this problem have

fully understood the racketeering nature of this business.

Should there be general freezing of German assets in this country
the dollar profits of the food package business in accounts in this
country would undoubtedly be subject to freezing. However, that in
itself would not necessarily prevent the Germans from raising money
in this country by the food package device for such uses as might be
permitted under licenses.

203

AXIS CASH WITHDRAWALS

In the course of its monitoring of the major embassy and consular accounts of
Axis powers, mainly in New York, FBI has come upon ever increasing instances of large
cash withdrewals:

The Italians withdrew in cash from May 10, 1940, to January 31, 1941, $13,709,250.
of this sum Luigi Podesta, representative of the Italian Exchange Institute, withdrew
in his individual name $8,992,500, of which $2,500,000 was in small denominations not
capable of tracing. We know that $4,450,000 in cash was transported to Latin America

by Italian officials last Fall.

German cash withdrawals from official accounts, November 1939 to April 11, 1941,
amounted to $3,130,000. While about $1,500,000 has been traced to J. P. Morgan and

Company, representing payments on account of German bond obligations, large sums are

still not accounted for. There is no doubt that Germans have large cash hoards in
this country for use here and elsewhere in this hemisphere.

Japanese cash withdrawals from official accounts in New York and Washington from
tember 14, 1940, to February 14, 1941, totaled $596,000, of which $546,000 has not
been accounted for. It is to be noted that the Japanese Embassy recently increased
the insurance coverage of currency in the embassy safe from $100,000 to $200,000.

It has become very clear that an elaborate shadowing and under-cover organization would have to be set up to enable FBI to follow these cash withdrawals. Recently the Germans and the Italians have been insisting on being paid in small de-

nominations, which cannot be traced by serial number.

Freezing would undoubtedly be useful as a means of controlling cash withdrawals

from official accounts, provided there is a strong investigative and enforcement unit
to check on the actual expenditures made under license. (It would be necessary that
the executive order be so drafted as to enable us to freeze resident aliens.)
There is a grave question, however, whether the Axis manipulation of cash would
be seriously affected by freezing. of course, official Axis accounts do not represent by far the assets available to the Axis governments within this country. Official Axis balances have been reduced to a minimum. We already have abundant evi-

dence that businesses States nominally owned by persons who would not

to would be used as covers for

Axisgovernments
be subject freezing
in control resort
the United
Axis activities.
The as
would necessarily
to wholesale
evasionsconcealment
and

rell as outright violations rather than to submit their subversive activities to

the scrutiny of this government. Therefore, the cash withdrawal problem under freezing in the case of Axis funds would be largely one of investigation and enforcement,
based in the main on violation of reporting requirements.
The proposed freezing order would also have no effect on Axis funds already

hoarded outside of banking institutions--in hotel vaults, strong-boxes, etc. This

results from the fact statute under which freezing operates is limited to

with institutions. It is therefore necessary to

regulations
Transactions hoarding.
banking that the
that
with some reconsider
ingenuity,
our
concerning
It is
believed,
however,
controlled.

including amendment of our hoarding regulations, this problem can be largely

204
5/6

MILITARY ORDER

By virtue of the authority vested in me as
President of the United States and as Commander in Chief

of the Army and Navy of the United States, I hereby
designate Major General James H. Burns, of the United

States Army, as Executive Officer of the Division of
Defense Aid Reports in the Office for Emergency Manage-

nent, to administer the functions described in the
Executive Order establishing said Division, which func-

tions are essentially of a military character, under the
direction and supervision of the President as Commander

in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 6, 1941.

205

MEMORANDUM

May 6, 1941

To:

Mr. Harry L. Hopkins

From:

Oscar Gox

Subject:

Colonel Lindbergh

One of the possibly effective ways to meet Lindbergh's
talk would be to find out how much he knows about the field in
which he is supposed to be an expert. My own hunch is that he
probably knows enough about a standard aircraft engine to do

a repair job in the same sense that a truck driver away from
garages knows how to repair a truck engine, but when it comes
to questions of superchargers, thermodynamics or the other

highly technical and intricate questions involved in aircraft
design and construction, I would suspect that he would be lost.
It might be a good idea to have an American Forum of

the Air session in which Lindbergh is asked to participate with
such people as Theodore Wright, Seversky and other individuals

who know the technical phases of aircraft and aircraft design.
It may well be that they can show him up in what is supposed to

be his own field of expertness.

Cot
OSC:ahb

206

101

Mr Secretary Mayenthan
)

d took the liberty
of relaying your idea about

the Boings

ose
6 May 1941

)

MR. COX

207

MEMORANDUM

To:

Mr. Harry Hopkins

From:

Oscar Cox

Subject:

Boeing Military Aircraft.

Secretary Morgenthau called to my attention yesterday
a fact which you may want to check up on through Lovett or other-

wise: No Boeing military aircraft are scheduled for delivery in
May, June or July 1941.

Five B-17E's are scheduled for delivery to the Army
and six DB-7B bombers are scheduled for delivery to the British
in August 1941.

It may be that the cessation of deliveries for the
three month period is due to the change over to the B-17E model.
However, it might be wise to continue production of the B-17D,

if practicable, until the B-17E comes off the line. This might
be one way of not losing three month's production. There may

also be other ways of preventing this loss.

lot

OSC:1wb

5/6/41

208
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE May 6, 1941
Secretary Morgenthau
FROM

Mr. Cochran

CONFIDENTIAL

Registered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follows:
£39,000
Sold to commercial concerns
Purchased from commercial concerns £12,000

In the open market, sterling opened and closed at 4.03-1/4, and there were

so reported transactions.

Continuing its improvement, the Argentine free peso advanced to close at
.2375, as compared with the level of .2355 which has prevailed during the past

few weeks. A small Continental demand for pesos was reported.

The Cuban peso strengthened to 3-1/4% discount, as compared with 3-13/16%
yesterday.

In New York, closing quotations for the foreign currencies listed below

were as follows:

Canadian dollar
Swiss franc
Swedish krona
Reichamark

Lira

Brazilian milreis (free)
Mexican peso

12-1/16% discount
.2321
.2385
.4005
.0505
.0505
.2066

In Shanghai, the yuan advanced 1/32# to 5-7/324. Sterling was 1/2 higher
3.87-1/4.

There were no gold transactions consummated by us today.
No new gold engagements were reported.

In London, a price of 23-1/24 was again fixed for both spot and forward

silver, equivalent to 42.674.

The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver was unchanged at 35 Handy

and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver was also unchanged at 34-3/44.

We made one purchase of silver amounting to 100,000 ounces under the Silver

urchase Act. This silver, bought for forward deliver, represented new production

from Peru.

209

The report of April 30 received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
giving foreign exchange positions of banks and bankers in its district, revealed

that the total position of all countries was short the equivalent of $6,991,000,
decrease of $400,000 in the short position. Net changes were as follows:

Country

England**
Europe
Canada

Latin America

Short Position
April 23

Short Position
April 30

$ 656,000

$ 648,000

3,522,000
157,000 (Long)
375,000

3,424,000
240,000 (Long)
383,000
1,328,000
1,418,000

Change in

Short Position*

- $ 8,000

- 98,000
- 83,000

+ 8,000

- 59,000
- 22,000

Other Asia

1,387,000
1,440,000

All others

168,000

30,000

- 138,000

$7,391,000

$6,991,000

- $400,000

Japan

Total

*Plus sign (+) indicates increase in short position, or decrease in long position.
Minus sign(-) indicates decrease in short position, or increase in long position.
**Combined position in registered and open market sterling.

pm.P.

CONFIDENTIAL