View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

DIARY

Book 383

March 18 and 19, 1941

Book Page

California
See Tax Evasion
Canada

See War Conditions
China

For letter to Ambassador, see War Conditions:
Lend-Lease

Contracts
See Taxation

-DDefense, National

Capital funds control under M-Day plan - 3/18/41
Defense aid supplemental appropriation bill, 1941..

a) Report
Dows, Olin

172
186
187

See Financing, Government (Defense Savings Bonds,
United States)
-F--

Financing, Government

Defense Savings Bonds, United States:

Dows, Olin: To advise on art work - 3/19/41

Release announcing issues discussed by HMJr, Bell,
Graves, Kuhn, Schwars, and Gaston - 3/19/41

Treasury group confers with representatives of
Federal Reserve Board and Jones - 3/18/41

Issue to be 52-54, March 15th"; Federal Reserve to
support both 2's, last issue and new issue if
necessary - 3/18/41

a) Press release - 3/19/41
b) Rouse and Sproul discuss success of issue 3/19/41

257

307,324
93

143
216

263,328

c) Closing of books - 3/20/41: Book 384, page 6
d) Subscription figures - 3/25/41: Book 384,

pages 209 and 372

Press release on 91-day Treasury bills offered on

March 14, totalling $200 million - 3/18/41

1,49.80

Financing conference; present: HMJr, Bell, Hadley,

Haas, and Murphy - 3/18/41
a) Conversation with Sproul and Rouse, who know

little about market since they were attending

Open Market Committee meeting in Washington..
b) Conversation with Burgess, who recommends

"doing refunding into same issue"
c) Conversation with Douglas
d) Traveller's Insurance Company being consulted..
e) Conversation with Cummings.

f) HMJr clears with FDR
Ford, John Ansel
See Tax Evasion

2

19,53,87
25

33.60
36

42
92

-aBook Page

Germany

See War Conditions: Germany; Shipping

Greece

For letter to Ambassador, see War Conditions:
Lend-Lease

-MMexico

See War Conditions: Airplanes

-NNational Defense Mediation Board

Executive Order establishing - 3/19/41

383

334

-RReconstruction Finance Corporation

Legislation making it legal for Jones to lend
money against British securities or properties
discussed by Jones and HMJr; nothing to be

done until $7 billion appropriation bill

passes - 3/18/41

116

-SShipping
See War Conditions

-T. Taxation

Sales Tax: HMJr's memorandum to FDR discussing

report of delay in placing of contracts - 3/19/41..

297

Tax Evasion

California: Ford (John Ansel) tells Ickes McAdoo,

his partner, etc., involved - 3/18/41
-U-

United Kingdom

See War Conditions: Airplanes; Military Planning

144

-VBook

Page

383

261

War Conditions

Airplanes:

Mexico: Planes for Mexico discussed by Wallace,
Young, and Lieutenant Gaxiola - 3/19/41
United Kingdom: Report on stocks, pilots,
etc. - 3/19/41

349,352

Canada:

British purchasing increased in Canada: situation
discussed by Cochran: Phillips, Pinsent, and
Playfair; Clark and Coyne (of Canada) 3/18/41

a) Canada's war expenditures - 3/19/41
Exchange market resume' - 3/18/41, 3/19/41

157,278
294

203,365

Germany:

Price Control: New regulations - 3/18/41

140

Lend-Lease:

See also War Conditions: Purchasing Mission

Only E90 million instead of the expected E195
million to be taken over - Prime Minister
expresses deep concern - 3/18/41
Bill passed by House - 3/19/41

199

Kingsley Wood memorandum - 3/19/41

339

Letter to Chinese Ambassador - 3/19/41
a) Answer - 3/26/41 See Book 384, page 234
Letter to Greek Ambassador - 3/19/41
a) Answer - 3/21/41: Book 384, page 161

333
361

363

Military Planning:
Reports from London transmitted by Halifax -

3/18/41, 3/19/41
Purchasing Mission:
See also War Conditions: Lend-Lease

205,367

Legislation making it legal for Reconstruction
Finance Corporation to lend money against

British securities or properties discussed by
Jones and HMJr; nothing to be done until $7

billion appropriation bill passes - 3/18/41

Lend-Lease legislation to end HMJr's responsibility
entirely:
a) Purvis told

b) Phillips told

c) Letter to Hopkins discussed by Treasury
group and Cox

116

72
76

119,147

Shipping:

Proposition to buy all German ships in Western
Hemisphere (33 or 34) for $12.5 million
discussed by Land, Cairns, Truitt, Gaston, etc. 3/18/41

Wood, Kingsley

See War Conditions: Lend-Lease

137

1

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington

Fress Service

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,

No. 24-7

Tuesday, March 18, 1941.

3/17/41

The Secretary of the Treasury announced last evening that the
tenders for $200, 000, 000, or thereabouts, of 91-day Treasury bills,
to be dated March 19 and to mature June 18, 1941, which were offered
on March 14, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on March 17.

The details of this issue are as fellows:
Total applied for - $442,380,000

Total accepted - 200,167,000
Range of accepted bids:

High - 100.
Low - 99.966 Equivalent rate approximately 0.135 percent

Average

11

"

If

price - 99.971

0.117

(86 percent of the amount bid for at the low price was accepted)
-000-

2

March 18, 1941
9:15 a.m.
RE FINANCING

Present:

Mr. Bell
Mr. Hadley

Mr. Haas
Mr. Murphy

Mrs. Klotz
H.M.Jr:

I hope you people are in better shape than

I am today. You (Bell) were a little tired

yourself yesterday.
Bell:

I was really sick when I went home.

H.M.Jr:

I knew I wasn't clicking, and my nervous
system told me there was something the matter

with you.
Bell:

Really? I went home about half past five
and took a drink, something I never do. It
kind of pepped me up a little.

H.M.Jr:

Did you go to that very exclusive party
last night?

Bell:

Yes. Wasn't it exclusive? I am going down

with the general public sometime.
Haas:

It won't be so crowded.

Klotz:

That is very cute. There were a million
people last night.

3

-2H.M.Jr:

Did you go, George?

Haas:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Did you faint?

Haas:

No, sir, I came through.

H.M.Jr:

Do you want to talk first?

Bell:

No, I don't want to talk. I am more confused
this morning than I was yesterday morning. I
was pretty clear yesterday.

H.M.Jr:

Yes, these fellows upset me all day yesterday.
Now, George, what happened back in your shop?

Haas:

There was only one thing that impressed me,

and that was the probability of rights being
sold with people choosing to buy the bond on

a subscription. That would make the thing
technically bad.
H.M.Jr:

Wait a minute, say it again.

Haas:

If a man holds rights and you have got a
premium on it and you are offering a refunding
and the cash at the same time, he would say,
"Here is a thing with a premium of a hundred

and one and a fraction. I will sell that

and get my hundred and one and a fraction
and get the bond which I want in a cash sub-

scription, get it for a hundred." He will do
that if he thinks the allotments are going
to be large. That will make a bad technical
situation. Now, Mr. Hadley suggested a way

to get around that, but it is not an entirely
happy solution, and I think I would stay - I
mean for my own opinion, I would stay on the
52-54. I didn't hear anything that would

4

-3-

change that. I wouldn't go out any further.
H.M.Jr:

Well, I am listening. I have got some ideas
myself. Go ahead, Hadley.

Hadley:

My suggestion comes as a result of the fact
that Mr. Devine and some of the others said,

and I had heard it before, that a billion
dollar issue is going to be rather heavy
until we get a better bearing on this taxable

bond area and his suggestion was to do a two
and a half per cent and a two and three quarters
and split the cash between each of them.

H.M.Jr:

Do what?

Hadley:

A two and a half per cent, say for two hundred

H.M.Jr:

No.

Hadley:

I think that is a good idea, but on the other
hand, we are not too sure of that two and
three quarters and --

H.M.Jr:

No, it is no good.

Hadley:

To me there was another out, if you want to
keep your cash on your two and a half per cent

fifty million, and two and three quarters for
two hundred fifty.

bond down and that is to say that the last

three quarters note which we put out, which

was only thirty-two million, ten of which is

in the Federal Reserve and ten in one other
bank, leaving twelve on the market, to say,
"We are going to open that up for two hundred

million cash." That leaves only an eight
hundred million issue in your two and a half
per cent or less, and the difference between
that and a billion dollars might give this
issue a wonderful start. In other words, you

5

-4would only have three hundred million in

cash available for subscriptions. Your

allotments would be low, and it would leave

a better taste in their mouths if the allotments are much lower than they were last
time.

H.M.Jr:

Now let me just - I got what you said. Let

me just ask you this, whether this makes
sense. They all seemed to think that on
the refunding of the note we should do the
bond and the two year note - not all of them.

Let's just say for a minute we do this. Then
the fellow that has the rights can either
take this note or the bond and having the two
year note there at a more or less fixed level
will keep the rights from going below a certain

point. Am I right on that?

Murphy:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I want to get that awfully sure, you see.
And if the rights won't go, sink below a
certain point, it also ought to have some
effect on the offering for the new money,
because it eases up the pressure. Am I right?
Just think of that a minute.

Bell:

I am not so sure that your rights will hold
or your notes will hold.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I just want to get this one thing clear
in my - the rights - if the thing works the
same way it did last time, and let's say this
three quarters per cent two year note will
stay about par or two thirds, somewhere in

there, that puts an underpinning to the rights.

What effect on one thing will it have? Will
it affect the price of the new bond if we

offer the bond and the two year note for the
refunding and if the same thing happens, let's

6

-5say that the old three quarter two years

will stay right around that level, does that

have any effect on the price of the new bond?
Do I make my question clear?

Bell:

You mean the new bond out now or the one you

H.M.Jr:

The one we are going to issue. Shall I state

Haas:

The when-issued price?

H.M.Jr:

Shall I state it again? If for the refunding
we get out a 52-54 and offer them also a two
year note, let's say the two year note will
work again the way it did last time, it will

issued?

it again?

be fairly steady, around par twenty, and the
man - he sits there, anyhow; he says, "I own

these rights and when the new bond, 52-54, goes

Hadley:

below a certain point, well I won't take it,
I will go into the old note." " It relieves
the pressure on the 52-54. Am I right? Or
won't it have any effect?
I am a little bit in doubt about that, because

H.M.Jr:

Now, what you suggested was, on the new money

we didn't have any trading in that new note
last time. We don't know whether the quotations
were strong or not, and the new note might fall
just the same way the bond did if there was
any trading worked into it. That is something
we have to leave to conjecture. We are not
sure whether the note really stopped the bond
or whether they met in coincidence.
I give them the note and the bond?

Hadley:

Right.

7

-6H.M.Jr:

Well, I wouldn't do it that way. I am just
thinking. If I am afraid of the new money,
then for the note I would offer them the
choice of the note or the bond.

Hadley:

Well, I would do it for both.

H.M.Jr:

You would do it for both?

Murphy:

It would be two of one and three of the other.

H.M.Jr:

I think that is an awful sign of weakness.

Haas:

H.M.Jr:

That is the only thing that -I think that is an awful sign of weakness.

Murphy:

That is the difficulty, but Bill thought that

could be gotten around by explaining that you

wanted to build up that note into a trading
vehicle.

H.M.Jr:

Dan, any time you want to, will you butt in?
Are you all right now?

Bell:

Yes, I feel pretty good this morning.

H.M.Jr:

These men came down here yesterday and cer-

tainly were convinced in their minds that we

shouldn't price it in connection with the
corporate market. Now, that at least is
their own thinking. I don't know whether

you have got that, but all who came down

said, "You mustn't price it to the corporate

bond market, you must price it so many basic
points di fference between the taxable and
non-taxable.

Bell:

That is right.

8

-7
H.M.Jr:

That is their thinking, but at least that
is the way they do the figuring. Now, let
me ask you this. You mean - let's take

these two (Haas and Murphy) first. You
figure this new bond by comparing it with
the corporate or comparing it - how do you

arrive at the pricing? Just you two.

Haas:

We arrived at the price by comparing it with
the Government market. We also looked at

the corporate market, but decided that it was
not a safe basis to use as a guide.
H.M.Jr:

Then you people agree with the fellows that
I saw yesterday, in other words, you are
pricing it by comparing it with the Government
bond market and not the corporate?

Haas:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

What did you do?

Hadley:

I did it the same way, but I arrived at a
little different answer. That memorandum
yesterday sort of surprised me after I read
it to find that I was pricing my bonds on
the corporate market. I do use them as a
guide, but I don't put primary basis on the
corporates.

Bell:

I think they both used practically the same
method. It is a question of where they

arrived on the chart, isn't it?

Haas:

Henry didn't think that and neither did I
at the time he wrote that.

Murphy:

It is a question of emphasis. Hadley told

us to use the corporate market as a guide,
and we don't see how you can arrive at a

9

8-

54-56 without having a real guide. We

didn't use it as a guide. We merely used it
to make us feel a little more optimistic about

a price arrived at purely by an intra-Government
comparison.

H.M.Jr:

How far apart were you men in your pricing?
What kind of a bond did you (Hadley) suggest?

Hadley:

I started out with a 54-56, which is two
years farther on than theirs and after listening
to these people yesterday and the fact that
only one of them was for that and rest were
for shorter bonds and they are going to make
the quotations when it comes out, I pulled
down to 53-55. That is one year difference.
Although some of the people yesterday said it
doesn't make any difference what month you

make the issue as long as it is within a
certain year. Mr. Devine said March or
December, '52. It doesn't make any difference,
just the name '52 is what counts.

H.M.Jr:

Where are you now?

Hadley:

I would say 12-14 years.

H.M.Jr:

Give it to me in years.

Hadley:

53-55.

H.M.Jr:

53-55? And where were you?

Bell:

You were what, 52-54?

Murphy:

Yes, still 52-54.

H.M.Jr:

Were you 11-13 yesterday?

Murphy:

That is right. The main difference between

yesterday and today was we thought we would

10

9-

probably compromise a little over Hadley's

direction, but now we feel that opposition
is really a compromise position. We feel
because we had a number of suggestions for example, Pope says you put out a 51-53

and if you are lucky, it will go. I think
that is extremely pessimistic. But the

52-54 doesn't seem to have the big margin

in it today that it did yesterday.

Bell:

But they all were in either 52-54 or 53-55?

Murphy:

Except Pope.

H.M.Jr:

Now, there was one man from the savings bank
who was 51-53, and I thought he was about as
shrewd as any of them.

Murphy:

Pope was also 51-53, if you didn't do his note.
He said 53-4 if you put out the five hundred

million of the note, but 51-3 if you did it all
in two and a half bonds.

H.M.Jr:

But weren't you people impressed with this
man Ihlefeld of the Mutual Savings Bank?
You weren't?

Murphy:

No.

Haas:

He has got such a bias for high interest

rates. He would like to get four, I think.

He is smart all right, but he has an extreme
bias.

Bell:

I don't think he watches the market as close
as some of the other fellows.

H.M.Jr:

Well, gentlemen, I just think at this time
that if we can't borrow five hundred million
dollars on a bond - I would much rather do

11

- 10 -

this, if you are afraid. I would much
rather have the note into a note.

Hadley:

I think that would be worse.

H.M.Jr:

Why?

Hadley:

Because you have already done over a billion
dollars worth of notes for new money and they

say that that area is upset and that would
mean five hundred million in your notes.

Murphy:

One thing, it would be a very sharp decline
value of rights, which would disappoint the

people. They have thought they were going
to get a bond and the rights have presumptively
got to the hands of people who are expecting
the bond.

H.M.Jr:

What are the rights?

Hadley:

They are going to run five to seven.

Murphy:

They would have to go down to about twenty.

H.M.Jr:

Every one of these fellows who came down

yesterday with the exception of Discount

lost their shirts in the last three weeks
in the bond market, and therefore - Pope

particularly, so -Haas:

H.M.Jr:

Bell:

That isn't good either.
And I thought Discount - I thought they talked

kind of mean.

Yes, I was surprised at Dudley Mills. I have

never seen him as nervous and jittery as he
was yesterday.

12

- 11 H.M.Jr:

Oh, I thought he was mean. I mean, the
whole thing yesterday was - left me - I

was very much upset.
Haas:

I didn't think, Mr. Secretary, that as we
quizzed these people, you know, on their
proposal --

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Haas:

Several of those didn't seem to - they made
a proposal thinking, "Well, you won't take

it," and it didn't seem, you know that they

were willing to stand by that. In other
words, if you took it and called on them for
help - I got that feeling, but you couldn't
prove anything.

Bell:

I think there was a little feeling over the

last issue that you asked so many people to

come down and advise you, and everybody said

something different from what you put out
except Devine and I think there was a feeling.

H.M.Jr:

What is that, Dan?

Bell:

I thought there was a feeling yesterday that

they had come down here before to advise the
Treasury, and we didn't accept anybody's advice

except Devine's, and that was pretty well

over the Street, wasn't it, that this is a

Devine bond, this 48-50, and I think there

is a feeling --

H.M.Jr:

Oh, that is what he meant. He spoke of it.
He didn't just say it in so many words.

Bell:

That is right.

Hadley:

He was actually high pressuring his customers

to buy this issue. He says, "It is my baby,

13

- 12 -

it is a good bond," and that is why the

volume was so high on it. He was lucky

that he was in there all right.
Bell:

There was one thing about this suggestion
of Hadley's. The chances are that the most

of your refunding will go into the bond, so
in effect you would take five hundred million
dollars out of the note market, which would
give you some relief and you put back two
hundred so the net effect would be three

hundred million out of the note market. I

don't like it, but it does --

H.M.Jr:

Bell:

What is that?

I say I don't like it, but it has that

advantage.

H.M.Jr:

Let me ask you this. Postal Savings, how
many special two's have they got, Postal
Savings and FDIC?

Bell:

I think they have got 90 million, and I
think the FDIC has about 60.

H.M.Jr:

How close are those?

Bell:

I can get it in two minutes.

H.M.Jr:

Can't you (Hadley) get it?

Bell:

No, it is on my desk.

(Mr. Bell left the conference and returned

with data.)
Bell:

Postal Savings has about five hundred thousand

and the FDIC has about ninety. There is about

twenty-five million dollars in cash.

14

- 13 H.M.Jr:

How much has the Federal Reserve got of
these maturing things?

Bell:

I don't know, do you?

Hadley:

No, I am not sure.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I can ask them. I will tell you,

gentlemen, after what I announced that I

was going to go ahead and the bond market

went up, didn't it?

Murphy:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, sir.
I would much rather make it extra sweet,
give them on a mathematical basis a hundred

and two, you see, but I just can not with

what I know is before us sit here and compro-

mise with these fellows by - for cash - say

I am so frank and I can only do two hundred

fifty of a bond and two hundred fifty of a

note. I can't do it. I have just got to

pull this thing through, and I would much
rather give them an extra half point and then
if the thing drops the way the last one did,

it is all right and on that basis they will
buy it and if they don't, I will; but you

can not sit here, the United States Government,
and say we can't borrow five hundred million
dollars on bonds, the two and a half per cent

bond. We just can't do it, not with the
program that is ahead of us. So I would rather
go on the sweet side.

Mathematically, what is there in the 52-54,
how many - you know, I like it on a basis
of a hundred and one over whatever it is.
Murphy:

Our estimated price that we have for it is
about one hundred one and thirteen thirtyseconds.

15

- 14 H.M.Jr:

It isn't enough. I will say that now.

Hadley:

Mine runs from one hundred one and three
quarters up, the same bond.

Murphy:

As your estimate of that bond?

Haas:

You can't save yours, Mr. Secretary, make
yours certain by making it sweet, because

if you sweeten it, it may not be there when

the bond is quoted.
H.M.Jr:

Price it for me at a hundred and two. Give

me a two and a half per cent bond that
mathematically sells at a hundred and two.
Hadley:

I think there are some technical features --

H.M.Jr:

Just a minute, wait a minute.

Murphy:

How about September 53-5? We have one hundred

one, twenty-five for that. If you cut that
back
to June
two for
it. 51-3, we have about one hundred

Hadley:

We have got three bonds in that area, and
they are going to be a detrimental influence
on any new bond.

H.M.Jr:

But they are partially tax-free.

Hadley:

That is all right, but that area is concentrated

and if you get 52-53, you get in a new area
where there would be more openings on the maturity
schedules for these investors.
H.M.Jr:

Well, what can we do with the two and three
eighths?
It doesn't have to be a two and
a
half.

Bell:

Isn't it costing us quite a bit of money
for that extra - say three years there?

16

- 15 Murphy:

It is costing us tremendously. It is costing

Bell:

Two and a half per cent for '48 to '51.

Murphy:

If you push beyond that, it will cost you

us better than two and a half per cent.

relatively little, that is for the extension

from 45-50 to 51-3 or 52-4. You pay around

three and a half per cent for the period
which you extend it. Beyond that, it costs

you very little as the curve extends. It
is in the most expensive position.

H.M.Jr:

What is the next position, what would it
go?

Murphy:

Going up?

H.M.Jr:

I mean beyond that.

Murphy:

You would have to go out to a two and three

H.M.Jr:

What about a two and five eighths.

Hadley:

1955 or '56, somewhere in there, but that

H.M.Jr:

Well that doesn't make any difference. Just because all the financial writers say two and a
half per cent, they are most likely wrong,

quarter.

is an odd size and it looks sort of funny.

the very fact that they all write it. You

fellows have kind of gotten frozen on this
two and a half per cent business.

Hadley:

On the theory you didn't want to go higher.

H.M.Jr:

There is no theory. There is nothing in

Haas:

I think a two and a half would probably go

this thing. We want to make our bond go.

better, Mr. Secretary, than shaving it.

17

- 16 Murphy:

I think a two and five eighths wouldn't
set well. It would give more impression
that we were afraid than even a note.

Bell:

I think we might run into the same difficulty

we had before that we talked one type of
financing and shifted to another.

Now, we have been talking two and a half here

in the last day with all these people. Now
we shift to a two and five eighths, and it
looks funny; and they are going to kind of
look it over a couple of days and that is

going to hurt it. I am inclined to think we
ought to stick to the two and a half and
put it some place in that 52-53 area.

Haas:

Maybe this concern about this rights selling
isn't so real. I was impressed by it. Maybe
Rouse wouldn't think so much of that.

Murphy:

Johnson didn't see any trouble about it at
all.

Haas:

Devine wouldn't trouble.

Bell:

No, Mills was really the one that is really

troubled, and yet we have had the same problem

right along and I suppose the only thing that

accentuates it at this time is the fact that

we might get higher allotments, but I am not
very much impressed with my argument. You

might sweeten the refunding a little, by giving
interest up to June 15.
H.M.Jr:

Pope said to do it the other way, charge them
a premium, didn't he?

Bell:

He said charge them a premium on the notes.

Murphy:

That was for cash, wasn't it?

18

- 17 Bell:
Murphy:

H.M.Jr:

No, on the refunding and the notes. Well,
I guess it was cash.
You could offer a par and twenty hundredths

notes.

It amuses me. These people come down here

and they are the great wizards of Wall Street
and are they confused.

Bell:

Well, there are not any two of them that
have the same opinion about the whole situation.

H.M.Jr:

Here is the president of the Metropolitan
Life who has the greatest pool of capital

in the world, and all he can say is, "I need
a three per cent bond."

(Telephone conversation with Mr. Rouse and

Mr. Sproul follows:)

19

March 18, 1941
9:45 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:
H.M.Jr:

Mr. Sproul and Rouse.
Hello.

Sproul:

Good morning, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

How are you gentlemen?

Rouse:

Good morning, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Fine. How do you people feel today. What

S:

I'11 let Mr. Rouse speak.

R:

As you know, both Allan and I were in

would you recommend?

Washington yesterday at the Open Market
Committee meeting and we didn't have the

benefit of the interviews which you did
and the feel of the market.

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

Well, I didn't know you were both here.
Well, I thought you did.

I think that is most unfortunate.
It was. In checking the market 80 far this
morning, we find that in a couple of the

spots which you interviewed yesterday, that
is, First Boston Corporation and Devine and

Company - their ideas are somewhat below what
we would think.
I

H.M.Jr:

R:

Excuse me. I think it's a great mistake
that one of you weren't in New York
yesterday. I didn't know that you were
down here. I think it is most unfortunate.
I mean, I don't want to hear what the
people I saw - I mean, I don't have to go
all through that again.
That's right, and our ideas here - we're
interviewing people again this morning
and we'll have a check on the ideas that
we had over the weekend in half an hour,

if that's all right with you.

20

-2H.M.Jr:

Well, what were your ideas over the weekend
before you talk to anybody?

R:

21 of 1953-55

H.M.Jr:

And that's for the new money?

R:

That includes new money.

H.M.Jr:

And for the refunding?

R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

And for the refunding.
I mean, do the whole thing in the bond?

Do the whole thing in the bond. If you
wanted to re-open the 2'8 of the 2-year
note that you offered last time, fine.
I'm really very much upset to think that

on a Monday before a financing that the
Federal Reserve in New York is down here
in Washington. That doesn't do me any

good. My heavens! I mean, I just can't
understand that.

R:

(Pause). Well, that was - didn't the Board

check with you? About the Open Market

Committee meeting?
H.M.Jr:

No. I didn't even know there was one.

R:

I'm sorry.

Sproul:

Well, Mr. Secretary, we took it up with
them and told them there was probably a
Treasury financing coming up. It was

the organization meeting of the Committee
and when it was called, we had to be there.
We were in touch with the market through
the day, however, and had our plans laid

for the final check today. I don't think

we could know any more about the market

at the time necessary to make a decision
today than we will know.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I can only repeat that I'm terribly
disappointed.

21

-3s:

Well, we'll have to make certain that
the same combination of events doesn't
happen again. That's all.

H.M.Jr:

Well, it just can't happen again, that's

S:

Well, we'll take care of that.

H.M.Jr:

Well, then really you know nothing

S:

Will it be convenient for us to ring you

H.M.Jr:

Well

S:

Half an hour?

H.M.Jr:

Let me just see a minute. Supposing you

R:

Yeah.

S:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

Quarter of eleven?

R:

That'11 be fine.

H.M.Jr:

Will you both call me back?

all. It just musn't.

back in about three-quarters of an hour?

call me back and give yourself, say, until
quarter of eleven? Hello?

H.M.Jr:

We'll do that, yeah.
At a quarter of eleven.

R. & S.:

Yeah. All right.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

R:

22

- 18 Bell:

You see, they had a reorganization of the

H.M.Jr:

It is just unbelievable that these two

Bell:

He is the secretary of the Open Market

H.M.Jr:

Well, they could have it on Sunday, they
could have it on Monday - I mean they would

committee yesterday.

men should be down here having a talk fest
with the people when I am sitting here sweating.
I mean, it is the most asinine performance
I ever heard of. What good does Bob Rouse
do down here to one of these debating society
meetings of the Federal Reserve?
Committee and he had to make his annual report.

have it any day except Monday and Tuesday.

Bell:

That was the reason Eccles told you the other

day that he wanted you to put it off until
Wednesday.

H.M.Jr:

Bell:

They don't know anything more today than

what they knew as of Saturday. You (Bell)
evidently knew they were going to have this.
Both of them are going to be there.
I didn't know who was going to be there.

I assumed Rouse would be there because he

is secretary, and had to make his annual

H.M.Jr:

report. But it was discussed at the meeting
the other day. You have just forgotten it.
I couldn't believe that both - it made no
impression. I didn't even know Rouse was
secretary. They just don't know what was
going on.

Bell:

All the presidents were here. They had to
re-elect their executive committee.

23
- 19 H.M.Jr:

Well, couldn't they postpone it a week?

Bell:

Well, I suppose it has been postponed since
January.

H.M.Jr:

Well, it just won't happen again.

Bell:

Well, that is the reason Eccles asked you

H.M.Jr:

to put it off until Wednesday.
Well, that is no reason.

Bell:

Well, certainly the market expects this issue
to be in the 51-54 area, doesn't it?

Hadley:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

That is exactly where they expect it to be
put.

Murphy:

You mean as first call dates?

H.M.Jr:

Have you got where the vacancies are, what
comes down from 50 on? Has anybody got a
chart?

Haas:

There is a book --

H.M.Jr:

George, it comes here when you give it to
me, not before.

Murphy:

Sorry, Mr. Secretary. I should have had

Hadley:

The first vacancy is in March, 1952.
(Mr. Hadley showed book of reports to the

that sheet with me.

Secretary.)

H.M.Jr:

I can't read them that way.

Haas:

Have you got a sheet, Murphy? I will get it.

24

- 20 H.M.Jr:

Does this give it?

Haas:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Well, show it to me. There is nothing,

Hadley:

Until December.

for instance, in '49, is there?

(Telephone conversation with Mr. Burgess

follows:)

25

March 18, 1941
9:52 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello, Randolph. Do you know anything

Randolph
Burgess:

Well, I've heard of it. It's mentioned

H.M.Jr:

Well, are you thinking about our refunding

B:

H.M.Jr:
B:

H.M.Jr:
B:

about the Government bond market?

around here once in a while.
and financing?

Yes, I've been doing some thinking about it.
Well, could you share it with me?

Well, I think the next step is the one
Dan talked about last time some, to put out
something in the middle fifties at a 21
coupon. That 8 what the market rather
expects. I think it would go very well.
Well, now, let's divide it into two pieces,
Randolph. What about the refunding?

Well, I'd do the refunding into the same
issue. The question is whether you wanted
to open up a note issue in addition. There
is no harm in opening up that same note

you sold last time if you want to for the
exchange. I wouldn't open it up for the
cash. I don't think it makes very much
difference. I don't think people would
take it very much, but it might give you
an anchor to windward on the exchange.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you could do it on the cash, couldn't
you?

B:

H.M.Jr:

Oh, let them take some of the note for cash?

I mean, just to offer it to them and - we

have done it without fixing the amount,
haven't we - or do you have to fix the
amount?

B:

I should doubt if that was desirable, Henry.
It would look a little as though you weren' t
very certain about yourself. We've usually

26
2-

fixed the amount and I think that to do
something that is kind of different might
not go so very well. I'm sure you can
sell $500 million cash.
H.M.Jr:

Have you any doubts?

B:

No.

H.M.Jr:

Well, the people who came down here

yesterday - they were awfully uncertain
of themselves.

B:

They were?

H.M.Jr:

Yeah. But of course they lost some money,
you know, the dealers.

B:

H.M.Jr:

Yeah. Everybody is prepared to stand by,
I think. I know we are. I think it would
be very wise for somebody to talk with
the insurance people, They all ought to go

along; I think they will.
Well, let me ask you this, just 80 I get it.

You're feeling is that - where would you put
the bond, Randolph?

B:

H.M.Jr:

I'd make it about a '53-55.
'53-55, and your first blush was we

could do it entirely in a bond.

B:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

But if you wanted to be a little safe,
let the refunding also re-open that note.
Yeah. Then you'd be sure of that.
And you, yourself, seem to think it would
be all right?
I think it would, yes.
Where do you think that '53-55 would sell -

B:

H.M.Jr:
B:

H.M.Jr:

about what price?

27
-3
B:

About 101. I don't think these things are

going to go to very big premiums, you know,

because people know they can get some more

at par a little later.
H.M.Jr:
B:

I see.

So I think that this business of running
up the premium to 102 - I think that's a

thing of the past. I don't believe you
can expect that now.

H.M.Jr:

I see. Do you own any of the rights?

B:

Yes, we have about 25 million.

H.M.Jr:

What would you do with them?

B:

We'll convert into the bond and we'll subscribe

H.M.Jr:

How much is that?

B:

Well, it's .....

H.M.Jr:
B:

H.M.Jr:

to cash our full limit.

50 million?
You'd presume to have in half the capital and
surplus, wouldn't you?
Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

About 75 million.
I mean, you'd be down for 75 million.

B:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:
B:

I see. Well, that sounds good.
Well, I think everybody would do that.

H.M.Jr:

I see.

B:

B:

I think it's important to talk with the
insurance fellows first. I've always felt
that calling fellows up ahead of time was
a way of selling your bond. You really
ask them about it and then they are sort
of committed to go along.

28
4H.M.Jr:
B:

I see.

Bo I think if you were to call old Mr. Ecker,

and Parkinson and have Dan call Steadman

at the Prudential and Lew Douglas and oh
two or three others, you know, you kind of
sell your issue in advance.
H.M.Jr:

I see.

B:

But I know what the Mutual Board - I'm on

H.M.Jr:

that - they'11 go along I'm sure.
Well, if during the day you change your

opinion, would you call me between now and
2:30?

B:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

If for any reason you change, call me before

2:30.
B:

Very good.

H.M.Jr:

I'd appreciate it.

B:

Fine, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

29

- 21 H.M.Jr:

I have got an idea.

Haas:

You probably can see better on the table.

H.M.Jr:

I think you fellows have got an awful lot

Murphy:

This area begins with a '51 to '54.

H.M.Jr:

How much is that?

Murphy:

Dollars are over there. That is the price
history of the issue over there.

H.M.Jr:

You see, Burgess said --

Murphy:

'53-5.

Haas:

We just put up one --

H.M.Jr:

This is what I was thinking about. Would
an issue to a fixed date be any sweeter?

Haas:

Yes.

Bell:

Probably would.

Hadley:

It would help a little.

H.M.Jr:

We have done that, you know, twice or three

of intestinal fortitude.

times in my time. I did it '47 and I did
it '48 when I was hard pressed.

Murphy:

I don't think it is nearly as sweet for
what you get for it, Mr. Secretary. That

is, you would have to put your fixed date

note more than six months ahead of what

would otherwise be the callable issue. I
would a lot rather cut the issue back.
Hadley:

I think if you can do a 53-5 you can do a 54

30

- 22 -

straight bond easily.
Haas:

I think that would raise questions in
peoples' minds.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am just rasing it. I am still

convinced I can do it, see. I have just
sold seventy-five million right now over
the telephone. You heard it. I mean, there
is seventy-five sold there and I bet you in
fifteen minutes I can sell this issue. I
am going to do it. I am going to sell it
right now.

Bell:

I think all those big banks will subscribe
their issues. They did last time.

H.M.Jr:

I am going to sell the issue in the next
half hour or I won't.

Bell:

George, what is your price on the -Is it one or two heurs difference between

H.M.Jr:

here and Chicago?

Bell:

One hour.

Hadley:

One hour.

Bell:

What is your price on the 53-55 bond? Have
you got a minimum?

Murphy:

For a March '53-5, we have par thirty.

Bell:

Par thirty? Burgess said it would sell

around a hundred and one. Hadley has got

a hundred and one eleven.
Hadley:

Yes.

Haas:

Our price and Burgess' is just about the
same.

31

- 23 Bell:

Yes.

Haas:

I think it ought to be a little sweeter.

Bell:

What do you suppose Parkinson does?

Haas:

I think he lives in Connecticut. He goes

up there and stays two or three days a week.

He is probably like the old Mr. Ecker. He

is gradually retiring.

What have you got a September 52-54 priced
at?

Murphy:

One hundred one, six. Hadley has got as
a minimum one hundred sixteen - one and a
half.

Hadley:

Right.

Bell:

I would cut it back a year from what they
were suggesting, or at-least six months,
September 52-54 and reopen the note.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I have never considered the 53-55.

Bell:

You say you never have?

H.M.Jr:

No. I just don't - I haven't been considering

Bell:

Is that it?

Murphy:

Yes, March 15.

H.M.Jr:

What is the matter with that, Dan?

Bell:

That is all right.
I will go along with that. I think it is

Hadley:

it. You boys suggested March 15, 52-54.

being more conservative than you need to
be.

32

- 24 H.M.Jr:
Hadley:

H.M.Jr:

Can't be. You think it is conservative?

I think it will show a slight sign of

weakness, that that is as far out as you
dare go, but on the other hand I don't
see any reason for not doing it.
Well, how can you talk about a slight sign

of weakness when you say you are recommending

I only sell two hundred fifty million of
bonds for cash?

Hadley:

I was saying three hundred because you have

got your five hundred refunding. That is an
eight hundred million dollar issue. On a
technical basis that the market didn't act

right on the last billion dollar issue and
it might be better to get the market set up
on a smaller issue and then move ahead next
time.

H.M.Jr:
Hadley:

It doesn't ring a bell with me.
Last time the issue sold off because there
were a lot of right holders that wanted a long
bond. They are getting a long bond, and

H.M.Jr:

this may go right up to the ceiling.
I think the reason it didn't sell last time,
I don't think the people knew how to figure.
(Telephone conversation with Mr. Lewis Douglas

follows:

33

March 18, 1941
10:05 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Lewis Douglas.

Lewis
Douglas:

Hello, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

How are you?

D:

I'm fine, thank you. How are you?

H.M.Jr:

I'm all right.

D:

That's good.

H.M.Jr:

Lew, have you been figuring at all on this

D:

I haven't in the last few days, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Well, could you think about it and maybe

D:

Yes, now in connection with what particular

Government bond market?

call me back?

thing, Henry?

H.M.Jr:

Well, tomorrow we have to announce a

refunding of the 500 million of notes

and we're asking the public to subscribe

to 500 million of cash, and it's in that
connection.

D:

I see, and you'd like to have my judgment
about what the rate should be and the
maturity?

H.M.Jr:

That's right.

D:

About both items.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

D:

All right, Henry. Were you thinking of a
long-term issue?

H.M.Jr:

Well, this is the way we're thinking.
We're thinking on the refunding to offer

34

-2them their choice of a 21% bond and to

re-open that last 2-year note. They can
take their choice.
D:

21 and

H.M.Jr:

The 3/4%, 2-year note, and then for cash
the 2% bond.

H.M.Jr:

And it is in connection really with the
maturity that
Well, the whole thing. It would be the

D:

Yeah.

D:

H.M.Jr:

same bond, you see.

It'd be the same bond but, I mean, whether
that seems attractive, whether you people

would be at all interested in that bond.

D:

Yes, I see, Henry. Have you any ideas could I ask you about what you were

thinking of in terms of the maturity for
the 2 ?

H.M.Jr:

Well, it varies from '52-54 to '53-55 -

D:

All right, Henry. Might I think about that

H.M.Jr:

somewhere in that range.

and could I call you back this afternoon?

No, I'd like to have you call me back if
you could, oh, between now - within an
hour if possible.

D:

All right, Henry. I'11 do that.

H.M.Jr:

Within an hour.

D:

I'11 do that.

H.M.Jr:

And, as I say, also whether this bond at
all comes within the range that you people
would be in the market.

D:

Yes. In other words whether there would be
some support from us.

35

-3H.M.Jr:

Well, I mean, whether you are potential

D:

Quite.

H.M.Jr:

See? I'm selling shoes today.

D:

(Laughs). All right, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

customers or not.

36

- 25 H.M.Jr:

I want to call up Walter - what is his

Bell:

Cummings?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. I get a couple of good customers, a
couple of seventy-five million dollar customers,
I am going to quit worrying.

Murphy:

Why don't you call up Travelers? They have

name out in Chicago?

been your best customer throughout the whole

pull.

H.M.Jr:

Travelers?

Murphy:

Yes. They were the first to go into the

H.M.Jr:

Who is the president of it?

Murphy:

Sacher.

H.M.Jr:

How do you spell it?

Murphy:

S-a-c-h-e-r.

H.M.Jr:

Do you know him?

Bell:

Baker we have had down here.

Murphy:

They were the first to go into the Government
bond market, and as far as I know, they
have been the largest on it and they have
gone into Governments exclusively to corporates and I think they represent a represen-

Government bond market.

tative point of view.

H.M.Jr:

Could you (Bell) call him? I don't know
him.

Murphy:

I have never met him. I have talked to
Baker, the treasurer.

37

- 26 Bell:

Yes, we have had Baker down here.

H.M.Jr:

Would you call him down here? As soon as

we get this next call, we will break and
come back at a quarter of eleven. How

do you (Murphy) know this?
Haas:

I sent him up one time at your suggestion.

H.M.Jr:

You should have had him down here.

Bell:

We had Baker on the list the last time, and
we had too many.

H.M.Jr:

Supposing you call him.

Bell:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

Who else did I have?

Bell:

Would you like to have me call Stedman, also,
of the Prudential?

H.M.Jr:

Yes, would you? When are we going to see

Bell:

It is a little late.

H.M.Jr:

Can't help it.

Bell:

The thing that worries me about it, your cash
is only open one day and if you don't catch

the Federal crowd? Two thirty?

a train before six o'clock, they don't get

out.

H.M.Jr:

Train?

Bell:

You see you have got to catch a train for
all of these Federal Reserve cities and
we do send night letters to every place where

38

- 27 -

H.M.Jr:

they think the train won't get there.
Well, you will have to send them all
night letters.
(Telephone conversation with Mr. George

Harrison follows:)

39

March 18, 1941
10:11 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Harrison.

George

Harrison:

Hello.

H.M.Jr:

George?

H:

Good morning, Henry. How are you?

H.M.Jr:

Oh, I'm alive. How are you?

H:

H.M.Jr:
H:

H.M.Jr:

(Laughs). Just about the same. I stayed
up too late last night.
Oh, you were dedicating the Gallery, huh?

Yes, I saw your picture - at a distance I didn't see you there.
Well, you know, distance lends glamour.

George, are you still interested in Government bonds?

H:

Very much.

H.M.Jr:

Or just in art?

H:

No, very much in your bonds.

H.M.Jr:

Do you know anything about it?

H:

Not very much.

H.M.Jr:

Well, . how long would it take you to find

H:

Well, I can

H.M.Jr:

out so you could give me some advice?

I mean, how long would it take you to call

up Marriner and ask him?
H:

(Laughs). Thank you, I'll give you some
independent advice.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah. Seriously.

40

-2H:

No, I'11 be glad to come down if you'll

let me.

H.M.Jr:

Where are you?

H:

I'm right here at the corner.

H.M.Jr:

Well, come on down. How long before you

H:

I'm all dressed, all set to go.

H.M.Jr:

Well, come right away.

H:

I'll be right over.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

can get dressed?

41

- 28 H.M.Jr:

That is the way to talk to a --

Bell:

He is the president of an insurance company.

Klotz:

How long before you can call Marriner? That

Bell:

is terrible.

And how long will it take you to get

dressed?

H.M.Jr:

Now, Walter --

Bell:

Cummings, Continental.

H.M.Jr:

So we don't double up, you do this and we

will meet back here again at a quarter of.

Bell:

Quarter of eleven?

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

42

March 18, 1941
10:19 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Mr. Cummings.

Walter
Cummings:

Hello.

H.M.Jr:

Walter Cummings?

C:

Yes, Henry.

C:

I can't hear you.
Yeah, this is Walter.

H.M.Jr:

Are you through a switchboard?

C:

No, I'm talking direct now.

Operator:

Just a moment, please.

H.M.Jr:

What?

Operator:

Just a moment.

H.M.Jr:

I can't hear him.

C:

Just a minute. Hello. Can you hear me

H.M.Jr:

now?

H.M.Jr:
C:

A little bit better - not too well.
All right.

Operator:

Hello, operator.

H.M.Jr:

Who is that breaking in?
Just a moment, please. I'm going to get
a better extension for you, Secretary

Operator:

Morgenthau.

10:20 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

43

-2Operator:

Mr. Cummings.

C:

Hello, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

I hear you better now.

C:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

Walter, have you been following this

C:

Yes, we have, very close.

H.M.Jr:

Government bond market?

Well, you know we're doing a refunding
and we want 500 million cash. Got any
ideas?

C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

Yes, we had in mind, Henry, that you'd
put out about a 14-or 15-year, 2%
14 to 15 years, 21.
Yeah. That kind of matches in with the

rest of the stuff on today's market, you
know, and that would fit in better than
H.M.Jr:

anything else in my opinion.
Well, now, do you think we can do the
whole thing into that bond?

C:

Yes. I think you could do it all.

H.M.Jr:

You think 80.

0:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Well, let me just see. I'm just looking
at what they've got here.

C:

This is the new money?

H.M.Jr:

Well, I was asking both for the refunding
and the new money.

C:

Oh. Well, then if you're going to do both,
Henry, I'd put out a short bond because
they won't want it but give them a choice
on it.

44

-3H.M.Jr:
C:

Well, how about re-opening the last note?
Well, not very many took that, you know.

H.M.Jr:

I know, but it would just be there.

C:

That would be all right because you give
them their chance then.

H.M.Jr:

Just on the refunding.

C:

Yeah, just on the refunding. Give them

H.M.Jr:

Yeah, either the medium - the 2% bond

C:

their pick on it.

or the last note.
Yeah, that's right.

H.M.Jr:

On the refunding.

C:

Yeah, that's right. That would go.

H.M.Jr:

What?

C:

That would be all right.

H.M.Jr:

But for the new money use the same bond.

C:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

You don't have any doubts about it?

C:

No, I'm pretty sure of that - as sure as
I can be. That would hit right in with
the market. I know 80 far &8 we're con-

cerned, we'd come in and take all we could

get.

H.M.Jr:
C:

You'd take your limit, huh?

Oh, yes. We'd take out limit then we'd
come out and buy them.

H.M.Jr:

What's that?

C:

Then I'd do better than that; I'd come in
and buy them on the market.

45

4H.M.Jr:

C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

I see. Some of the fellows in New York

are a little bit - oh, a little pessimistic,

I mean, they're talking about
They're not pessimistic on the 21 are they?
Yeah, they question whether I can sell
500 million for cash of the 21's.
Well, Henry, you can sell 500 million at
2% for cash without any question. They're
just talking about something that they're
not sure of.
Well, how are some of the banks out there
that you do business with?
Well, everyone out here in the Middle West
will take them, Henry.
They will.
This crowd out here in the Middle West

will all come in and take these 21's.

H.M.Jr:

They will.

C:

I'm sure of that, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Well, that's what I want to find out. I

was confident myself but some of the people

who came up from New York yesterday kind
of scareime.
C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

If I could do it legally, I'd underwrite
the 500 million for you but I can't do it.
Well, they had me down so that we were

talking about 11-13 years instead of 14-15.
No, you don't have to do that.

H.M.Jr:

What?

C:

You don't have to do the 11, 12 or 13

H.M.Jr:

unless it fits in better with your scheme.
No, it's just that these New York fellows

are scared.

46

-5C:

No, I just think they are wrong, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

You think they are wrong.

C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

I think they are wrong, yeah.
Because you are out in the center of
things I wanted to call you.
Well, we've studied this every day, Henry.
We're following it awfully closely. I
sent Knight down to talk to Danny about it
sometime ago.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah. Well, I'm glad to get the encouraging
word because you know New York, when they're

blue, how blue they are.
C:

Yes, I know that but out here in the
Middle West we'll all take it.

H.M.Jr:

Fine.

C:

It'11 go well out here.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

C:

H.M.Jr:

you

All right, Henry. How're/feeling?
I'm all right. I'm going to get away

Thursday or Friday for a week or 10-day
holiday.

C:

Going down to Sea Island?

H.M.Jr:

No, we're going down to Arizona.

C:

Oh, good. I was out there at Chandler
for a couple of weeks.

H.M.Jr:

Well, we go down south of Tucson.

C:

That's out of Tucson, isn't it?

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

0:

Well, I hope you have a nice time. Take
care of yourself.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

47

March 18, 1941
10:27 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Hopkins.

Harry

Hopkins:

Hello, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Good morning.

H:

H.M.Jr:
H:

Henry, we didn't get to talk that thing
through with the President last night.
Pardon me?

We didn't get that great conference with
the President last night. Now, I've got
to move on this thing and I've decided to
ask General Burns to look after this thing
while I'm away, and I'm anxious to talk to
Phil Young today about this business I want
him to do and I'm going to have a talk with
him.

H.M.Jr:

O. K.

H:

I had a talk with Phillips.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

H:

And they said if we'd put up the money promise to pay them back - they'd do it.
Now, they've got a whole list of stuff God knows what - and I told them that I
understood the arrangement was that up

to $600 million, but the less the better,
that we'd pay out of the $7 billion, and
that I didn't want to go into the detail
of what it was, that it was a financial over-all financial transaction, and as far
as I was concerned, they could order anything
they pleased but that I didn't want to
discuss the items with them.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

48

-2H:

I told them that they should be careful
not to put items in that would be embarrass-

ing later to us - politically - for the

President.
H.M.Jr:
H:

I see.

If they were in doubt about it, they
ought to remember that the President's
going to make this list public and they
also should avoid putting items in that
they' re going to have a hell of a fight
with the Army and Navy about.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

H:

And they all seemed very agreeable with

that, and I told Phillips that I didn't
think our Government would put anything
in writing, that he'd have to take it from

you and from me, that that was the intent
of the Government and we meant business.

H.M.Jr:

Right.

H:

All right, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

49

March 18, 1941
10:45 a.m.
RE FINANCING

Present:

Mr. Hadley
Mr. Murphy
Mr. Haas

Mrs. Klotz
Mr. Bell

H.M.Jr:

Well, while you people were out of the

room, Walter Cummings says 14 to 15 years.

He says it will go over and he personally,
if he could legally, would underwrite the

whole issue.

Chicago. "I will take the whole issue
if you will let me take it." And the

only other person I have had is George
Harrison, who says that they have eighty

million and they will take twenty million

of it if they can get it.

Haas:

Did Cummings mean that 14 to 15--

H.M.Jr:

He just said 14 to 15 years. He just said --

Bell:

That puts it out there.

H.M.Jr:

Pardon?

Bell:

Even the maturity date puts it out beyond
anything we have been thinking about.
Fourteen would be '55.

50

-2H.M.Jr:

I had to look to get down to 14 to 15 years.

I couldn't find it. But he says, "I will

underwrite it, I will take the whole thing."

Hadley:

H.M.Jr:

I was --

Just a minute, please. What luck did you

have?

Bell:

The Travelers say that a two and a half
per cent in the amount of five hundred

million, '52-'55 area, will be all right

from their standpoint, and that they have

always been large subscribers to Treasury
offerings and they would be a large sub-

scriber to this one. The president couldn't
say how much, he didn't have the figures

before him, but he said they would like to

have a substantial block of it.

He said he didn't have any of the notes and

he wasn't interested in the note, the refunding. He would prefer, of course, two

and seven eighths, but he says they always
take whatever the Treasury offers and are

glad to get whatever they can get out of it.
Stedman was not quite so enthusiastic.
He said, "What we want, of course, is a

two and three quarters." He said, "We
could sell the five hundred million two
and a half and it will go," but he said,
"there might be some subsequent shifts

and churning of the market," but he said,

they will take their share and they certainly
will hold them for awhile, but they wouldn't
want as many of the two and a halves as they
would if they were two and three quarters.

They have twenty-four per cent of their

assets in Governments at the present time.

51

-3H.M.Jr:

Which company is that?

Bell:

That is the Prudential.

H.M.Jr:

That is over in Newark, isn't it?

Bell:

Well, he is in New York.
Sacker said, "We have always been heavy

subscribers and we will be to this one,
and we hope we will get a substantial block."

They still have some doubt in New York

about the bill.

H.M.Jr:

Have you been talking to them?

Bell:

I just picked up the phone as I started
in here and just got in two words.

H.M.Jr:

Kind of beat the gun on me, did you?

Bell:

No, Rouse called me.

H.M.Jr:

What you have got to make up your mind is,

New York is a little bit bluer than any
place else, and if Chicago is all right

and the insurance companies are all right
and the mutual savings companies are all
right, we can just forget New York.

Hadley:

I was just talking to some of the people
in New York, and I think we saw all pessimists yesterday, because the trading desk
at Discount is saying at least 54-6,
Salomon Brothers is saying '56-'58, G. W.
Rich is saying around '54 or'55, and we

Murphy:

didn't get near that yesterday.
I talked to Piser while we were out, and he
wants a March '52-4 now --

52

H.M.Jr:

Just hold it, please.
(Telephone conversation with Mr. Sproul
and Mr. Rouse follows:)

53

March 18, 1941
10:56 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Sproul and Rouse.

Robert
Rouse:

Hello. We're both on the wire, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

Good.

R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

We've reviewed very carefully this thing,
going back over the past few days and the
factors that we believe one would have to
consider here. As far as the condition of
the market is concerned, we're satisfied
it's a good market on which to do it. The
news is all right, nothing very positive
about it and I think from that standpoint
it might be regarded that way this morning.
Yes.

The statements last night in respect to
the discontinuance of the bill - the R.F.C.
financing - and no Treasury financing after
this until May I think was very helpful and
is definitely regarded this morning.
Good.

The market both yesterday and today is in
a waiting period for the announcement.
Nothing much went on yesterday.

H.M.Jr:
R:

Right.

But in reviewing the thing - you remember
dollars could be done but it was the

Allan told you - we felt that a billion
maximum.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

R:

We still feel that same way and we think

it's advisable, if possible, to have a
positive success of this financing rather
than a negative success. In the light of
that, we'd recommend that you do a 2%
bond and, because of the condition of the

corporate market and for further testing

54

-2of the Treasury bond market, do an

additional issue but not in the 2 and 3/4

range. We'd suggest you offer the 2% bond
of 1952-54 for exchange.

H.M.Jr:

What month?

R:

March.

H.M.Jr:

52-54. Yeah.

R:

That you offer 300 million of the same bond
for cash and 200 million of the 2-year note
and let the holders of the rights exchange

into either.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I don't know whether they've got any
vitamin pills down there but I wish you'd you fellows would take a few and then take

another look at it.

R:

(Laughs). Well, as far as the maturity

of the bonds are concerned, a year doesn't
make very much difference. We wouldn't
go any shorter than 52 and we wouldn't
quarrel with 53-55.
H.M.Jr:

No, as of this moment, March 15th, 52-54

R:

go shorter.
I see.

H.M.Jr:

suits me all right. If I went anywhere, I'd

Now, as to the refunding, I'm all right
on the bond and re-open the old note, see.
The only place that we differ is on the
500 million. United States Treasury can
borrow 500 million from a bond properly

priced.
R:

Well, I don't think there is any question
as to your borrowing it. We're thinking in
terms of the secondary market. There has
been no clarification of the tax situation

H.M.Jr:

And there won't be until - put this down in
your book. If you know what the next tax
bill 18 going to be by the first of July,
you'll be lucky.

55

-3R:

I can well believe that.

H.M.Jr:

So you've got that before you from now

R:

But there will be a good deal of talk

H.M.Jr:

Plenty, and you saw what Chairman Doughton

until the first of July.

about it and some indication won't there?

did yesterday. He completely discredited

all the talk and 80 did I. I said, "As
far as the Treasury is concerned, we haven't
talked to anybody. But there will be that
constantly from now until the first of
July. Now let me give you something why
I feel that the thing can be done. George
Harrison was down - just left a few minutes
ago - and he'll take the 21; he'11 take
20 million. Walter Cummings, Chicago,
said he'd take the whole issue if he could

get it. Hello?

R:

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

He said he'd underwrite the whole issue;
he said it would go big. Randolph Burgess

says they'11 take the limit - 75 million.
Now that's just a few. Dan talked to the

Travelers up in Hartford, Connecticut,
and they'11 take what they can get. Now,

Mutual Savings fellows were down here and they've been the most - they wanted a 51-53,

but they said they were good for 400
million.

R:

Well, there's no question of the backed-up
buying power.

H.M.Jr:

See, they said they were good for 400 million.

Well, I've given you - the Mutual's plus a
couple of banks and the issue is sold.

R:

Well, there's no question of selling it.
will those fellows buy an additional supply
over their allotment in the market at a
premium?

H.M.Jr:

That I don't know.

56
-4
R:

H.M.Jr:

That's the problem that bothers me.

Now, I tell you what I'd like you to do
for me. I wish you could get - whoever

the highest man is you can reach at the
Chase and talk to him and call me back.
I'd like to know what they'd do on a 21,

52-54 for cash. Hello.

R:

Very well, I'11 do that. I've talked with
the senior man on bonds over there this

morning. Their tentative ideas as to a
21 would be a 53-5 or 54-6. As to what

they would do I didn't ask him. I will.

H.M.Jr:

Well, ask them what they'11 do. Just
a minute, Bell is saying something.
(Pause) And the Guaranty.

R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

Right.

Those two - I'd like to know what they'd
do on the line.

I'll do it and call you back.
Now one other thing. Just a second, please.
(Pause). On the secondary market, there
is a fellow by the name of Morgenthau, see,

and he's got$200 million to invest. Hello?

R:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, sir.

I've got $200 million to invest for Postal

Savings and F.D.I.C. and just keep that in
mind. Hello?
R:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

See? I've got 200 million in those two

institutions. So see if you can't work
up a little enthusiasm, sincerely. I

don't want you to advise me anything you know. But ask the Guaranty and the
Chase right on the line what would they do.

R:

Well, Mr. Secretary, I can say right now,
if you have 200 million to help support

57

-5the secondary market, then you can do the
whole thing with a 52-54, plus opening the

note for exchange, and that's that.

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

Well, I've got 200 million.
Well, then I'd say you can do the whole
thing with a 52-54.
Well, I'm going to use the note on the

refunding because I think that that is
smart. Now let me ask you this. What is
the Federal's position on these notes -

how many do they own?
R:

58 millions.

H.M.Jr:

58 millions. I see.

R:

There are about 266 million that can be
accounted for. The savings banks have
very few, I think the insurance companies

have 60 odd million the last figures I

saw, the New York banks 100 million and
out-of-town banks account for about another

75 million, 80 far as we know of the
holdings.

H.M.Jr:

Well, if I could find out what the Guaranty

will actually do, plus, let's say, the

Bankers, plus the Chase - hello?
R. and S.:
H.M.Jr;

Yeah.

Those three and then would you call me

back?

R:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

If you please.

R:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

58

-5H.M.Jr:

You say these fellows - where did you get
that information from?

Hadley:

At the Federal Reserve.

H.M.Jr:

What did you say?

Hadley:

From the trading desk of the Federal
Reserve, and they have gotten it from
people on the Street.

H.M.Jr:

What did they say?

Hadley:

Dominick says '55-'56. Salomon Brothers

says '56 up to '58. Discounts trading men
say '54-'56. Mr. Mills yesterday had a

53-5, but he was a little bit skeptical

of that, and sometimes you get a different
picture when you talk to people that are
actually doing the trading.
H.M.Jr:

Well, they are all much more cheerful than
anybody else.

Hadley:

Than any that we have talked to.

H.M.Jr:

George, you have been sitting there like

a sphinx. I apologize. I thought that

was you belching. (laughter)

He (Dano) is right in line, and I heard
these belches and I said, Well, well, well."
Bell:

You notice, too, that it came when you

mentioned Chase.

H.M.Jr:

Dano went "pffft."
Come on, George, put yourself right on

the line.

59

-6Haas:

Well, I feel that a '52-'54, that is our
story and we are stuck with it. We will
stay there.

H.M.Jr:

For cash?

Haas:

For both?

H.M.Jr:

Yes, but five hundred million for cash?

Haas:

I think that is the thing you should do, but
it is not ironclad, Mr. Secretary. The ironclad is this - unless you get assurances from

them up there and with these insurance companies

you have it practically sold, you are all right,
but it is not ironclad. I think the chances
are nine to ten it will be all right; but I
don't think it is ironclad. There is one
out in it, the thing I mentioned when I first
came in, that might develop.

H.M.Jr:

What is that?

Haas:

That issue is a billion dollars, and the
market may expect large allotments, and there

may be a tendency at the onset to sell their
rights thinking they can buy the bond at par
on subscription. But that may not develop.
H.M.Jr:

It may go off fine.
Well, if the offering is going to be big
allotments and they put less allotments,
they don't get what they want, there is
your secondary market.

Bell:

The savings bank man figured on an 18 per
cent allotment.

H.M.Jr:

Well, they would take less.

Haas:

Well, the point is, Mr. Secretary, if they
expect a small allotment they will hesitate

60

March 18, 1941
11:10 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Lewis Douglas.

Lewis

Douglas:

Hello, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Lew, how many shoes do you think you can

D:

Henry, let me deal with the two phases
of the operation.

H.M.Jr:

Go ahead.

D:

The new money first.

H.M.Jr:

Please.

D:

A 21, 52-54 would be attractive, and we

use?

would like to get 10 millions of them.
Now, might I ask you this, Henry, that
is, of course, subject to the approval

of the Finance Committee that meets tomorrow
afternoon.

H.M.Jr:
D:

Yes.

On what basis do you allocate subscriptions?
Generally on the basis of the cash balance

at the end of the previous year, isn't it?

H.M.Jr:
D:

No.

Now, we have tried to pull our cash balance
down and we're going to continue to do it
and if subscriptions are made on that

basis, we are rather hurt by trying to

keep our money at work. You see what I
mean?

H.M.Jr:

D:

Well, a bank, it's one-half of their

capital and surplus and we try to do the

same thing with an insurance company. See?
I see.

61

-2H.M.Jr:

We try to do it on the same basis.

D:

That's rather difficult to do with a
mutual, isn't it.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

D:

But you see what I mean, Henry

H.M Jr:

But, normally, what would happen is,

let's say just supposing the thing - we
got $2 billion worth of subscriptions there'd be a 25% allotment.

D:

H.M.Jr:

Yes, I see.
That's the way, depending upon how much

you put in. If you subscribe for 10
million and the allotment was 25%, you'd
get 21 million.

D:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Does that answer your question?

D:

Yes.

H.M.dr:

That's the way it is usually done.

D:

I see. All right, Henry. That takes

H.M.Jr:
D:

care of the new money. The 53-55 wouldn't
be as attractive to us as the 52-54, but
we would still take them.

But your people feel 52-54 - I mean, how
would you describe it?

Well, that would be quite attractive to
us.

H.M.Jr:
D:

Well, that's all I wanted to know.
All right. Now, on the refunding operation,
we would turn over - we have about 16
millions 8 and we would turn them over
into the 21% bond.

H.M.Jr:

I see.

62

- 3And the note, Henry, I think I wasn't

D:

clear. What was the rate on the note?

H.M.Jr:

Well, it's the note we offered last time.
It's a 2-year note with a 3/4's of 1%
coupon.

D:

H.M.Jr:

D:

H.M.Jr:

I'm afraid that I missed that detail.
Well, that's just there as a catch-all.
Last time we only sold 30 million of them.
We just offer it again as a sort of a
catch-all 80 that the people don't say,
who have the notes, that we are forcing
them into a bond. If they want to take
a note why it's there.
I get it. Well, we would turn over our
16.8 millions of the 1-3/8's for the 2+%
bond, Henry, and we'd like like the devil
to get 10 millions of the new issue.
Well, that's very good news and it's a
clean-cut answer and that's just what I
wanted.

D:

Well, there's one further thing I would
like to tell you because I don't want to
conceal anything from you. We might sell
a small part of our 48-52's, taxables, and

buy some more of the new issue, 2 at 52-54,
in the market.

H.M.Jr:

Well, that's interesting. That's all right.

D:

But I wanted to tell you, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Well, that's all right.

D:

We wouldn't sell enough obviously to
disturb the market.

H.M.Jr:

No. That's all right. The market is open

D:

O.K., Henry. Does that dispose of it?

H.M.Jr:

Entirely. Thank you 80 much.

D:

Thank you ever so much. Good-bye.

H.M.Jr:

Good-bye.

and we're going to keep it open.

63

-7-

selling -H.M.Jr:
Haas:

You said a big allotment.

Well, if they expect a big allotment and
they are certain ot if, then they can sell
their rights and buy the bond in the subscription because they are going to get big
allotments, but if they expect small allotments, they will hesitate selling the rights

and the way to cut that down is to cut down
the size of the issue and put some risk on the

down side, on the allotments. If they thought

it was going to be heavily over-subscribed and
they would get a small allotment, that would
remedy that situation, and the device that
Hadley suggested is one way to do that; but

I don't like it for the same reason you don't

like it.
H.M.Jr:

Now listen, George, as of this minute, ten
minutes past eleven, yes or no --

Haas:

I will go with the way you are thinking.

H.M.Jr:

All right. That is all I want to know.
(Telephone conversation with Louis Douglas

follows:

64

-8
H.M.Jr:

That is a clean-cut answer.

Bell:

You see they want the higher earnings.

Hadley:

Some of your savings banks may do the same

thing, those that got our last two per cent

bond might sell them and pick up this new
one.

H.M.Jr:

Now, what I think I will do now, gentlemen,

is this. Why don't we let everything cook
until two o'clock. I will meet with you at
two and Danny, don't hesitate to spend a

little money on night letters tonight.

Bell:

We always do.

H.M.Jr:

Who decides whether there should be a night

Bell:

The Federal Reserve Banks. We always tell

letter or not?

them in a telegram that if they feel that
the mail will not get into the hands of the

banks by the next morning, then they are

directed to send night letters in every case;
and there are always night letters in the

West because the mail is poor and trains

are not very - don't run so often.

H.M.Jr:

All right, I will see you all at two o'clock.

65

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941
TO

FROM

Secretary Norgenthan
Mr. Cochran

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

At 11:10 this morning Assistant Secretary of State Acheson told me that Under
Secretary of State Velles had received two cablegrams from Minister Lane at Belgrade.
Mr. Welles had discussed the Yugoslav situation with President Roosevelt, but the lat-

ter is not willing to take a decision on freezing in present circumstances. Mr. Velles
had also consulted Secretary Hull in the premises and the latter feels that the amount

of gold involved is too insignificant in comparison with the attending political

question. Furthermore, Mr. Lane had recommended that the gold transaction be put
through, after he had discussed the question with various officials in the Yugoslav

Government and Central Bank. Consequently, Mr. Welles was to receive the Yugoslav

Minister at 11:15 this morning. It was planned to tell the latter that the transaction
under question would be permitted but that any further withdrawal of gold from the

Yugoslav National Bank account in New York would lead to immediate freezing of Yugoslav

assets here. Mr. Acheson told me that he had been unable to get this information to
Secretary Morgenthau, since the latter was engaged in a financing conference. It was
agreed that I should drop by Mr. Acheson's office to see the telegrams under reference,
nd then report to Secretary Morgenthau at the noon hour.
I called at the State Department shortly before 12:00 and read the two cablegrams
in Mr. Acheson's office as well as current cablegrams from the Balkans in Secretary
Hull's office. The messages from Belgrade indicated that the Yugoslav officials explained the transfer of their assets from New York principally upon the ground that
they feared their total reserves here might be tied up under a general freezing order

of the Balkan States. They did not wish to risk all of their gold on this one market,

but promised that the balance of some $40,000,000 would be left here if the two payments to Argentina and Brazil are permitted. The Government gave various assurances

to Minister Lane with respect to their determination to resist Nazi aggression. It

was in view of such promises that Minister Lane recommended that the transaction be
permitted.

I reported the foregoing to the Secretary at 1 o'clock and also mentioned the
pending application involving the B.I.S. withdrawing $1,800,000 from this market to
purchase Swiss francs for Yugoslavia. In view of the State Department's attitude, the
Secretary authorised me to clear both the gold transaction and the B.I.S. application.
I told him that before so doing I would endeavor to have one more talk with Mr. Acheson
to see what the result of Acting Secretary Welles' conference with the Yugoslav Minister
had been.

I reached Mr. Acheson at 1:10 p.m. He spoke with Mr. Welles over another phone
while I held the wire. Another cablegram had been received from Belgrade since I had
called at the State Department, reporting that the Yugoslav Minister of Court thought
that the United States was using financial pressure to force Yugoslavia into an alliance
ith the British, and there were other indications that resentment was growing at our

66
2

holding up the gold transaction. The Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Yugoslavia
were leaving shortly for Berlin where it was expected that some one or more agreements
with Germany would be concluded. The exact character thereof cannot be known perhaps

before the end of the week. Mr. Acheson told me that Mr. Welles thought that neither
his conversation with the Yugoslav Minister nor the latest cablegram changed in any
way the position. That is, the Treasury should go ahead with an approval of the pending financial transactions in which Yugoslavia is involved.
Immediately after this conversation I telephoned Mr. Knoke at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, whom I had previously asked at 12:40 to stand by. I summarized to
Mr. Knoke the developments to date and told him that the Stabilisation Fund would now
buy the gold offered for sale by the Yugoalav National Bank, and that this should be

delivered to the Assay Office today. The Federal was then free to carry out the
instructions received from Belgrade as to the disposal of the dollar proceeds of this
transaction. I told Mr. Knoke that I had also spoken with the Secretary in regard to
the B.I.S. transaction, and that I would communicate on this with Mr. Pehle.

At 1:20 I telephoned Mr. Pehle and also summarized to him the morning's conversations and cablegrams, mentioning particularly the Secretary's approval of the clearing
up today of pending Yugoslav financial transactions. It was understood that Mr. Pehle
would clear the B. I. S. application through Under Secretary Bell. since this matter
had been discussed with the latter at our group meeting yesterday evening.

At 3 o'clock this afternoon I reported developments to the Secretary and also let
in know that an official of the British Embassy had told me in strict confidence that
ais Ambassador had received instructions to take up with the Department of State the
reported request of the National Bank of Yugoslavia for the transfer of funds from
this market to Brazil and Argentina, and to use this as pressure on Yugoslavia vis-a-vis
Germany. I let the Secretary know that I had told the British official that the State
and Treasury Departments were already fully aware of the situation and doing what they
properly could.

67

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941
TO

FROM

Secretary Morgenthau
Mr. Cochran

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

After making an appointment by telephone this morning, I called on Admiral Noyes
at the Navy at 11:45 a.m. I handed him a typed draft of a message which he should
send today to the Naval Attache at London for delivery to the Chancellor of the
Exchequer setting forth our offer to purchase $120,000,000 of gold. I worded the con-

tract identically with that for the last shipment. Admiral Noyes showed me the text

of a message which he was despatching to his ship at Pernambuco instructing the vessel

for her voyage to South Africa. He asked me to raise the question with the British as
to the possible obtaining of 8,000 barrels of bunker oil by the American Naval vessel
at the port where the gold cargo is taken on, since the ship cannot carry enough oil
from Brazil to last through the home trip from South Africa.
Upon returning to the Department, I telephoned Mr. Pinsent to the effect that

the

message was being despatched to London today. Pinsent has now wired the Treasury that

this is expected. Pinsent also is taking the necessary steps with his people to assure
the availability of the desired bunker oil above mentioned. He let me know that word
had now been received that the port of embarkation of the gold will be the same as last
time. I have, in turn, communicated this to Admiral Noyes. The latter decided, however,
to instruct the ship to proceed to the larger nearby port, and will indicate the smaller
port only as the ship nears its destination. At his request, I asked Pinsent this evening
to make sure that the cargo would be ready by March 29. We are all to keep in touch
and confirm later the prospective date of arrival.

AMP

68

Naval Attache please present personally following message:

"From the President and the Secretary of the Treasury to the
Chanceller of the Exchequer:

#Pursuant to and in confirmation of the conversations had is
Washington with Sir Frederick Phillipe:
"(1) An American Naval vessel will proceed to agreed port where
the Commander will enbark approximately 120 long tons gold representing approximately 120,000,000 dollars. Detailed inventories with
description packages and estimated value will be given this official
who will give a receipt.

"(2) Title to such gold shall pass to Government of United States
upon packages being taken in charge by Commander of American Naval ves-

sel. All risk of loss remaine with British Government until delivery

at United States Assay Office in New York. Insurance is to be covered
by British Government.

"(3) Upon receipt of cabled advice from British Government as to
exact weight and fineness of gold in cargo and after American Naval
Commander has reported to this Government that gold is safe on board,
Secretary of Treasury will direct Federal Reserve Bank New York to
credit as an advance to British Government account 95 percent of total

value calculated at 35 dollars per fine ounce. Final adjustment will
be made after gold weighed and tested New York Assay Office with usual
charge of one-quarter percent and deductions for handling, Mint and

trucking charges. British Government agrees to reimburse and indennify
Government of United States and Secretary of Treasury for any advance
payments and expenses in the event of any loss of gold or underweight."

HMC:1ap-3/18/41

69

call.

millions

new

person
years
adavi
your the revelent and the

Secretary of the Treasury facts

the Reauallor of the Exchague

0 Pursuant to and in con.

livination of the conversation
had iv Washington with Sir

aderick Philleps

(1)
Yes
free
Quarican Moral

Proceed to e grey where the 120 will
which /long appropriately

the hous representing appropisately 120 million Collers

with description

mackages

will be give this official who
will give a receiptHell

Title to such sld United
millpress
to
the
Hater

taska tills to the pet

70

beisp

upon

Jackay are Taken
U charge Farm to Mary
with
the lixry Britisle at writed
States
is to
bee
to
work your upon Inverauce

13) the the receipt # coked
drice from the Britisk

nut as to and finc
uss mercause of you cargo and after

Noral the presenter has beto 14 safe
on
Hoard
Secretary
of
will direcT Indical aw

B

Bank as credit Briterik Deven

weat account worth 95 ur cent of
talvalue
in hive nuce A
after

ented office with used

wip of me quality Ret pert and mint

educations hawling
charges.
migrad Trusting

71

winkers and
be
Butch
spreed
on
idensify Calemotion

4 the Tregram and

be any admiss kayment Methos

i the exot g any loss I sea
underweight

72

March 18, 1941
11:48 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Mr. Purvis.

H.M.Jr:

Hello, Arthur.

Arthur
Purvis:

Good morning. How are you?

H.M.Jr:

O.K. Arthur, just 80 there can be no
possible misunderstanding between you or
Sir Frederick Phillips or myself and
the United States Treasury, I just want
to let you know that as of the 15th of
March, the Treasury or the people who work
for me in no way feel any responsibility
for what happens to the placing of your
orders after the 15th.

P:

I see.

H.M.Jr:

Hello?

P:

H.M.Jr:

Yes. Feel no responsibility for placing
orders after the 15th.
Now, any arrangement that you make with

Mr. Hopkins - you look to him and not to
me.
P:

No, I understand that. May I ask you one

question on it? It does not mean, I take
it - in fact, I'm sure it doesn't from what

you've told me before - that you are in

any way unsympathetic to the idea of new
contracts coming under the Lease-Lend

Bill later if - I mean, when the Appropriation Bill comes through that it would
be retro-active.
H.M.Jr:

No, no.

P:

You
lies simply
..... mean that the responsibility

H.M.Jr:

I'm entirely sympathetic with the idea;

I'm the instigator of it.

73

-2P:

H.M.Jr:

P:

H.M.Jr:

That's what I felt. I just wanted to make
sure I hadn't lost your help on that if
later it were necessary.
No, I'm the instigator and I'm entirely in
sympathy, but, as I tried to explain to

you and to Lord Halifax, I've done business
for seven years by word of mouth
That's correct.

...... and again with the British Treasury
we're on the plane where I have complete
faith in them, but you are going into a
new transaction again by word of mouth,
and I want you to feel that in no way can
you look to me.

P:

No, no, except for your sort of sympathetic

help without responsibility. Is that right?

P:

Sympathetic help .....
Without responsibility.

H.M.Jr:

Perfect.

H.M.Jr:

P:

(Laughs). Henry, I've got it well in

mind.

H.M.Jr:

Perfect, and I'm going to tell exactly
the same thing to Phillips. I mean, I'm
not in any way - I just want to be for your
sake - before Hopkins gets on that train
tomorrow that you have a clean-cut understanding with him.

P:

Yes. You couldn't tell me about what time
he's going could you?

H.M.Jr:
P:

No. Because I've carried this 100% myself

and I can't carry a divided responsibility.
No, and, Henry, I know it myself. It can
not be done successfully.

H.M.Jr:

And so I just don't want to feel that I'm
sharing it with anybody.

74

-3P:

No, no. He's a little bit inclined, you

see, in talking with me to bring you in all

the time and I am assuming really that what
you're saying is that when Cox helps him,
Cox 18 helping him as his man.

H.M.Jr:
P:

When he's helping him, he 18 helping him
as his man and not talking for the Treasury.

No. I'm rather glad to have it stark and
clear although I think I understood it well
enough.

H.M.Jr:

P:

Well, it is too much involved and I do

everything on good faith and I don't want
that in any way disrupted.

No. Well, now that's splendid. Thank you,
Henry. May I ask you one thing while I'm
on the telephone?

H.M.Jr:

Please.

P:

You have been very good in being willing

to facilitate our getting some Coast

Guard cutters. A little question has

arisen that Philip may have mentioned to
you or not.- I sent Commander Gilbraith

over to him - but I wanted to get your
advice if I could. There would be
a great value if some of those could be
20 knoters, and I understand there are
some 20 knoters. On the other hand, I
have rather understood that the situation
has developed on the basis of 16 knoters.

Now, I'd really like to ask you this.
If this 20 knot thing turned out, after
further telephoning to London, as being a
very vital matter, would it be wise or
would it not, in view of the help on the
convoys, to bring that up, or would it be
better to leave it stand at the 16 knoters just as a pure horseback opinion.

H.M.Jr:

Bring it up. After all what we want to

give you is something which will be useful,
not decorative.

75

P:

(Laughs). Yes. You're grand. Thank

you, Henry.
H.M.Jr:

All right.

P:

Thank you, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

Good-bye.

76
March 18, 1941
11:56 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Sir Frederick Phillips.

Sir Frederick

Phillips:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Morgenthau speaking.

P:

Oh, yes.

H.M.Jr:

Hello, Phillips.

P:

Good morning, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Phillips, so that there can be no possible
misunderstanding between your Treasury and

mine, because there hasn't been for seven

years, I just wanted to tell you officially
that any orders which are placed by your
Government after the 15th - hello?

P:

H.M.Jr:

After the 15th.
Yes. That I am in no way responsible for
them. Hello?

P:

You're in no way responsible.

H.M.Jr:

No.

P:

Well, that means that

H.M.Jr:

That you have to look to Hopkins.

P:

Yes, that's right. I think that's quite
clearly understood.

H.M.Jr:

But I mean any steel, or any understanding

you have with him on the side, will be
between you and Hopkins. You see?

P:

Yes. Everyone clearly understands that.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I just wanted to make terribly sure
because we've gotten along 80 fine and
while I've carried the whole responsibility
there has been no trouble.

-2P:

H.M.Jr:

What
sir? particular danger were you fearing,

Well, nothing except that I thought that
you might be looking to both of us on this for the next two weeks. You know what I

mean.
P:

Oh, I see. Well, I think that's quite

clear here. We actually saw the gentleman

yesterday.
H.M.Jr:

Well, just so that you understand that

the agreement is between you and Hopkins.

P:

That's all I want.
Yes, that's right. That was our understanding.

H.M.Jr:

P:

H.M.Jr:

Now, I've said the same thing to Purvis
and he summed it up this way. He asked
me, am I sympathetic. Yes, but I don't
want to assume any responsibility. Does
that make it clear?

That makes it quite clear, sir.
I'm entirely sympathetic but in no way

responsible.
P:

H.M.Jr:

Right.

And I got your message on the gold and
I'm very much pleased and I hope to see
you and Clarke sometime tomorrow.

P:

Yes, right. Thank you, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

78
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941
Secretary Morgenthau

opening
10 an

W: H. Hadley

TREASURY BONDS

Coupon

Term

Yield

Price

Premium

2 1/2%

11 - 13 yrs.

2.27
2.32

102.7
101.23

2 pts. 7/32
1 pt. 23/32

2.29
2.34

102.3
101.19

2 pts. 3/32
1 pt. 19/32

2.30
2.35

102

2 pts.

101.16

1 pt. 16/32

2.32
2.37

101.28
101.12

1 pt. 28/32
1 pt. 12/32

2.35
2.40

101.20
101,2

1 pt. 20/32
1 pt. 2/32

2.37
2.42

101.15
100.28

1 pt. 15/32

2.60
2.65

102.10
101.17

2 pts. 10/32
1 pt. 17/32

(3/15/52-54)

11 1/4 - 13 1/4 yrs.
(6/15/52-54)

11 1/2 - 13 1/2 yrs.
(9/15/52-54)

12 14 yrs.
(3/15/53-55)

12 1/2 - 14 1/2 yrs.
(9/15/53-55)

13 - 15 yrs.
(3/15/54-56)
2 3/4%

20 -22 yrs.
(3/15/61-63)

28/32

79

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE March 18, 1941
Secretary Morgenthau

TO

FROM

2:00 P. M.

V. H. Hadley

TREASURY BONDS

Coupon

Term

Yield

Price

Premium

2 1/26

10 - 12 yrs.

2.25
2.30

102.8
101.25

2 pts. 8/32
1 pt. 25/32

2.30
2.35

101.30
101.14

1 pt. 30/32
1 pt. 14/32

2.32
2.37

101.25
101.9

1 pt. 25/32
1 pt. 9/32

11 1/2 - 13 1/2 yrs.

2.33
2.38

101.23
101.7

1 pt. 23/32
1 pt. 7/32

12 - 14 yrs.

2.35
2.40

101.18
101.1

1 pt. 18/32
1 pt. 1/32

101.9
100.25

1 pt. 9/32

(9/15/53-55)

2.38
2.43

13 yrs.
(3/15/54)

2.32
2.37

102.

2 points

101.14

1 pt. 14/32

20 - 22 yrs.

2.60
2.65

102.10
101.17

2 pts. 10/32
1 pt. 17/32

(3/15/51-53)

11 - 13 yrs.
(3/15/52-54)

11 1/4 - 13 1/4 yrs.
(6/15/52-54)
(9/15/52-54)
(3/15/53-55)

12 1/2 - 14 1/2 yrs.

2 3/4%

(3/15/61-63)

25/32nds

80

March 18, 1941
2:00 a.m.

RE FINANCING

Present:

Mr. Bell
Mr. Haas
Mr. Murphy

Mr. Hadley

H.M.Jr:

Bell:

There was a call in from Sproul, but I didn't
talk to him.
I got Rouse. He said he tried to get you and

he called me.
H.M.Jr:

What was the news?

Bell:

Bankers Trust Company has five and a half mil-

lion of the rights which they will exchange

for the bonds. Their limit of subscription
would be 37 and a half million and they will
put in the limit. They wouldn't say that

they would hold them personally, but they
would not unload them on the market at any
time when it would not take them.

Chase has no rights. Its limit is a hundred
million and it will subscribe for the hundred
million, or at least Green said he doesn't
think there is any doubt but what they will.

81

-2Aldrich is in Washington. He said before

he went to Washington he talked to him and
they talked about 52-54 security.
H.M.Jr:

Did they?

Bell:

Yes. And he is quite certain--

H.M.Jr:

He talked about 52-54.

Bell:

That is right, and he said he is quite certain that they will go the limit as usual.
Guaranty has a few rights. What-is-his-

name didn't know the but
was
10 not
and
Hethan
said are

they

they would ordinarly like, but

will of thought bond convert. it that less amount, they million, he said the type he

they would subscribe for a moderate amount
and take them as an underwriting matter.

They would sell out to their customers and
80 forth. They would certainly take as much

as 25 million, although their limit is a

hundred and 30 million on their capital
surplus.

Knight of Chicago called in to Rouse while
he was doing this telephoning, and they are
talking about a 54-56, and of course they
will do what Cummings told you, and they
will buy the bonds If they go down to a hundred
and one and buy them in substantial amounts
in the market.
Burgess says the same thing, that when the
bonds get to 101 they will buy them and they
will buy them down as they go, and he knew

what he told you about subscriptions. He
says the market is - the people they talked
with this morning are doing a great deal of
talking about a 53-55 or a 54-56, and they

think it is important that you go to 53

82

3-

because that gives you a five-year spread
between the 48 and 53, and they think

that is important. They think that will
give some resistance to the selling of the
two's and going into the three's - or into
the two and a half's. So that they said
they had not had their vitamin pills--

H.M.Jr:

Who said that?

Bell:

Rouse. And they definitely recommend that
you issue the 53-55 instead of the 52-54.

that is as of 12:30.

H.M.Jr:

I would say he has had vitamin pills.

Bell:

Yes, has had them.

H.M.Jr:

Is that what he said?

Bell:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

How does Mr. Bell feel after lunch?

Bell:

Well, I think that is the area, but I wouldn't
quarrel about a year, 52-54 suiting me all
right, although I would like to get away

as far as I could from that 48 call date of

the two's. It gives us a little more for

our money, and it sets a pattern.
H.M.Jr:

George?

Haas:

I feel like I would like to get out farther,
but I would stay with the 52-54.

H.M.Jr:

Henry?

Murphy:

I haven't had my vitamin pills, so I am still
with the March 52-54. I would like, if I

83

4-

could, Mr. Secretary, to give you the
results of Mr. Piser who was most optimistic last time, maybe suffering perhaps

from a little reaction of the Russian

pessimism.
H.M.Jr:

He is a little under vitaminized, is he?

Murphy:

He is a little under vitaminized this time,
but he has a good record over a period of
time, and I think he ought to be heard.
On Saturday, when we checked with him last
at the time that Bill was for a 54-56 and
we were for a 52-54, he was half way between

us, for a 53-55. He is not a bit happy
about it today, and now he is definitely
for a 52-4 which he prices at par and threequarters to 101 and a half. He says he has

a lot of confidence in the bottom part of

his range. A March 53-5, however, he prices
at par and a quarter to 101 and a quarter,
and he says he doesn't think you should go
into it unless you have an agreement with
Federal to support the market.
H.M.Jr:

For which?

Murphy:

Fifty three-five, but 52-4 he feels happy

H.M.Jr:

about.

God, I will begin to worry now, if that is

what Piser wants.

Hadley:

I think he got a nice scare last time, and
he is going to be on the low side.

H.M.Jr:

If Piser is for that, then I begin to question
the veracity and everything else.

Haas:

He did - he was there originally, Mr. Secretary. He came down.

84

5H.M.Jr:

Now, after telling me where Piser is,
have you talked with Murphy?

Murphy:

Murphy still thinks the March 52-4 is pretty
good.

H.M.Jr:
Murphy:

Is that what he tells you?
That is what he tells me.

H.M.Jr:

Is Murphy pretty happy about it?

Murphy:

Yes, Murphy is pretty happy about it.

H.M.Jr:

Has Murphy got anything else to say?

Murphy:

No.

H.M.Jr:

What about this fellow?

Hadley:

It doesn't make any difference, 52-4 or 53-5.
I think they are going to price them the same
and if you think you are going to get more
premium on the 52-4, I would take it, but I
think 53-5 is better on a maturity basis.

H.M.Jr:

Which one are you for?

Hadley:

For the 53-5.

H.M.Jr:

Have you got anything more from desk to desk
down there?

Hadley:

I got a feeling that if we had a 10-12 or

a 11-13 or a 12-14 that they would price them
all about the same, that they wouldn't go
much above a point and a half on any of them,
even though on the curve they might look like
two point issues. They seemed to be holding
down the premiums, as we see on this 48-50,

the last bond, whereas the ones around it

85

-6have gone up about three quarters of a point.

This last bond has just stood by itself.

H.M.Jr:

How are the rights?

Hadley:

The rights are up three thirty-seconds at
101, 8.

H.M.Jr:

Up?

Hadley:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Is that good. I would rather see them go up
than go down. That means all the talking we

have done, they find out what we are doing

and they think the rights are more valuable.

What, Dan?

Bell:

They are looking at it.

H.M.Jr:

These talks certainly--

Bell:

Oh, say, they go back having inside information,

some of them. I think that is what hurt the
boys last time. They thought they had the
thing hit on the nail head and they missed it.

H.M.Jr:

They thought that what-is-his-name had more
than the others, Devine?

Bell:

I don't know that they thought that, but I

think they were surprised when we came out
with a two percent, 48-50, and when they found
out that was what Devine recommended, they
thought we had taken Devine's advice instead
of some of the others.
H.M.Jr:

Bell:

You didn't talk to anybody else, did you?
No, I didn't. Did you want to see Edwards
before he leaves town tonight?

86

-7H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Bell:

Did you make arrangements?

H.M.Jr:

No.

Bell:

Well, I just spent an hour with him before
lunch and he is leaving tonight to go back
home and go to the convention on Friday.

H.M.Jr:

A quarter of four, how is that?

Bell:

It is all right.

H.M.Jr:

Is he going down to Louisville?

Bell:

Yes, he is going down to Louisville. I think
you ought to think whether you shouldn't
announce before Friday the set-up. I mean,
like Edwards and Johnson.

H.M.Jr:

I think so.

Bell:

Because we want to give a letter to Johnson

that he is the Treasury representative, but

that might be a little late, If it is

announced beforehand, it might help.

H.M.Jr:

Have we ever announced Johnson?

Bell:

I would announce the staff set-up, I think,

H.M.Jr:

We could do that any time.

Bell:

We gave Houston a little statement that he
might make Friday morning and that will be

at the same time.

followed by Edwards making a statement.

(Telephone conversation with Mr. Sproul and
Mr. Rouse follows:)

87

March 18, 1941
2:13 P.m.
H.M.Jr:
Robert

Hello.

Rouse:

Hello, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

O.K. Did you have a good lunch?
We had a good lunch and we've had our
vitamins and as we see it now and with that

R:

fellow, Morgenthau, with 200 million, we'd
say a 53-5, 2 would do the job.

H:M.Jr:

Un-huh. Does the Federal Reserve take any

R:

Well, we would take the participation involved

participation or not in that.
in our exchange

H.M.Jr:
R:

Golly, I don't think you got enough vitamins.

(Laughs). Well, with all the other
people who want to get in on it, it doesn't
look as though we would be needed any more

than that.

H.M.Jr:
R:

Well, I'm still on the March 15th, 52-54.

I haven't changed from that.
Well, we have no argument on that except

that it would be a little better to be five

years away from the 2's than four years
away and that the one year on the 2g won't
make enough difference to give you added
insurance - much added insurance. It'd be

a little insurance but not much.

H.M.Jr:

I don't get this five year stuff. What is

R:

Well, it's not just a finish, it's that

that Wall Street finish?

the 2 is only four years away from the

2. It might lead to a little weakness
in the 2'8 - a selling of the 2+s in order
H.M.Jr:

to buy the 2a's.
Well, you know, I have only four toes -

I don't have five toes. I count everything
on my toes.

88

-2R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

R:

You don't work by the usual digit method
them.

No, so four years looks better to me than
five.

Well, that might react a little against
the 2's.

Well, that's true, but I'm frankly not
thinking about the 2's, and I think on
the pricing 52-54 is closer.
Well, I was interested in the people that
called in and the people with whom we
talked.

H.M.Jr:
R:

How many toes did they have?

They all had five toes, and they're thinking
in terms - oh, for example, the Continental
called in here and talked with me and they
told me they were thinking in terms of
told me substantially
54-6, Ben
I gather what the chairman had told you,

and Randy called in, Randy Burgess, and he

was talking 53-5. Two or three of the
dealers called in talking 53-5 or 54-6.

In fact, the savings bank group and Chris
Devine are the only two who've talked
52-4 or 51-3.

H.M.Jr:

The savings banks are 51-3.

R:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

How is this fellow Ihlfeld?

R:

Well, I hoped that Johnson would go down.

He's the man that I've had most dealings
with and He I think knows more about it

than Mr. Ihlfeld, but they've been very
good in the past and they've always done
what they said they would do. I think
you can take it that they speak pretty well
for the general run of savings banks
whether they're wise or not. That's another

question. I think they have some wisdom,
but they do seem to speak for the savings
banks and to know what their reactions will be.

89

-3H.M.Jr:

of course, they were a life-saver last

R:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

Chris Devine is where?

R:

Chris Devine is in favor of two issues,

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:
R:

time.

and he was talking 52-54.
And the other issue is what?

His other issue was 60-63.

Oh, well that's crazy.
I think if any of those people who are
on the short side knew that you were able
and willing if necessary to support the
secondary market, that they'd certainly
move up a year.

H.M.Jr:

Well, that's something I hope I won't have
to do but we will do it and do it cheerfully
and fast. We won't have to call any Board
meeting.

R:

Well, it's partly with that possibility,

although I don't think it would be likely,
but the possibility and the certainty that

you'd be there that we would have no
hesitation about the 53-5.
H.M.Jr:
R:

Have you told Eccles about my underwriting?

No, we have not. We didn't think that
was our business to tell him, that you
could if you wanted to.

H.M.Jr:

O.K. I just wondered. I'm glad you
didn't because I'm going to have a little
fun with him on it.

R:

Well, we didn't tell him that.

H.M.Jr:

O.K.

90
4R:

H.M.J.:

There's one more thing. The Continental
got specific about their buying in the
market and for the issue and their idea
of price to start anyway is 101, and
Burgess also said if the market weakened
that he would be a buyer in the market.
Good.

R:

I judged on a scale down from 101.

H.M.Jr:

101.

R:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

Well, the Board will be over here in about
ten minutes and as soon as they leave we'll
give you a ring.

R:

Fine.

H.M.Jr:

We'll give you a ring as soon as they

R:& B.:

We'll be here.

H.M.Jr:
R:

leave.

Thank you. I'm glad you took a few

vitamins.

Well, we're feeling much stronger since
lunch.

S:

We had a rough ride coming home on that

R. & S.:

train last night.
Well, I'm sorry. (Laughs).
(Laughs). All right.

H.M.Jr:

Good-bye.

R. & S.:

Good-bye.

H.M.Jr:

91

Bell:

He didn't expect that last remark. He
expected something else.

92

March 18, 1941

I cleared with the President at 2:20 pm
today on financing.

93

March 18, 1941
2:30 p.m.

RE

FINANCING

Present:

Mr. Bell
Mr. Murphy
Mr. Haas
Mr. Hadley

Mr. Eccles

Mr. Ransom

Mr. Piser

Mr. Goldenweiser
Mr. McKee

Mr. Jones

H.M.Jr:

Well, I have been talking to a lot of people
that have got the blues, that is, in New York.
Chicago feels pretty good. How does the
Federal Reserve feel?

Eccles:

We feel all right. You can't tell anything

about the country by the way New York feels.
We decided that a long time ago. Do you want
me to --

H.M.Jr:

Sure, sound off.

Eccles:

Well, we discussed this just a few minutes
since we were over here the last time, and
we understood it had been decided to get
five hundred million of new money, refund the

June issue, and that it had pretty well

determined upon a two and a half per cent
coupon.

94

2-

(Mr. Bell entered the conference.)
Eccles:

So that it seemed to get down to a question

of pricing. I think we would favor a 53-55.
There has been some talk of a 52-54. Fiftythree--fifty-five might, on the face of it,
look a little thin. We are of the opinion
that the two and a half per cent bond with
the higher coupon, that there will be less
interest in a one year -- I mean, there will
be less attention paid to whether it is a
52-54 or 53-55 than there would on a lower

yield, that the investor in this higher yield
security is looking at the yield, I think, a
little bit more than the maturity.
(Mr. Jones entered the conference.)
Jones:

H.M.Jr:

My name is Cummings.

I have to laugh because Jesse said Cummings

was his name.
Eccles:

I heard him the first time.

H.M.Jr:

Go ahead.

Jones:

Walter Cummings.

Eccles:

I didn't think he had any guilty conscience.
I was just saying that a maturity of one year
more or less with a coupon of two and a half

is going to make, I think, very little difference. The reason we favor the 53-55, it is a
five-year longer maturity than the two's that

were last issued.
H.M.Jr:

You are another one of these fellows that counts

everything on his toes. That is what I have
been telling New York. I told them I have only

95

-3got four toes.
Eccles:

Well, I hadn't thought about that.

H.M.Jr:

What do you do if you have four toes?

Eccles:

You don't want to encourage a switching from
the two's that were issued last time to the
two's and a half. I understand there is some

little selling out of the two's now in antici-

pation of taking the two's and a half. The
shorter the maturity of the two's and a half,
I think the more encouragement it would give

to a switching operation. I think we would
favor leaving it open for the cash offering leaving it open for two days on small subscriptions, closing it one day on the bigger
ones, giving it possibly two days on the

smaller ones. I don't know what amount.
Somewhere around fifty thousand. That
usually amounts to five or ten thousand

dollars, what they finally get, so if you
allot on a basis of the allotment - on the
refunding, handle it just like it was handled
before, leave it open for an extra day for
the small holders --

H.M.Jr:

Well, to go backward on the thing, we thought
that two days for the note holders was enough,
because we don't think there are any small
holders of these notes. The fellows that have
their notes, most of them know their way around
town.

Eccles:

Well, I think that is generally true, but there

may have been some small owners who, of course,

bought the rights just for the purpose of

getting in on this. I don't think it is impor-

tant. The only - should there be small holders,
they would merely have a little more time to

96
4-

come in.
H.M.Jr:

What do you think, Dan?

Eccles:

I do think, though, the fact that it is notes,
what you say is true, they are pretty well
held by the big outfits.

H.M.Jr:

I doubt if anybody has under a hundred thousand

Eccles:

So - are they that closely held?

H.M.Jr:

We think so, yes.

Bell:

Half of them are.

Eccles:

Then you wouldn't need to leave them open an
extra day.

H.M.Jr:

We were planning two days.

Eccles:

Last time you gave two days and an extra day

H.M.Jr:

That was a bond. Dan is taking extra trouble

dollars of notes.

for the small holders.

this time to tell them if there is any question
at all to send night letters, but the other
one was a bond.

Eccles:

Well, there was more involved, too. There was
both a bond and a note, and you had a billion
two involved.

H.M.Jr:

We don't think there are any small holders.

If there are, we greatly question it.

Eccles:

Well, it would be following the same pattern

that you did before. I don't think it is
important whether you do or you don't.

97

-5-

H.M.Jr:

Do you people feel strongly about that?

McKee:

I feel very strongly, Mr. Secretary, that
sooner or later you ought to
and do something

your
is
closed
they
really get a notice of it, an official

for that the where Twelfth District issue places before like

notice -H.M.Jr:

Is the Twelfth San Francisco?

McKee:

Yes. Their territory is so far reaching.
The idea has been presented to us by Mr. Day
out there, that if in certain sections of
this country they just had a little more
notice --

H.M.Jr:

Well, I --

McKee:

You might be able to eliminate those people
who have stimulated to some extent your
secondary market for your securities --

H.M.Jr:

Well, we pay for the telegrams, don't we?

Bell:

Yes, but the trouble is that so many of those
small banks delay putting in subscriptions, and
we had a number of kicks on the last issue,
even extending it over a day they didn't get
in because they were waiting for the application
forms to arrive. Now, most banks have been in
this business with us long enough to know that
we will take a telegraphic application, to be
confirmed by a formal application later. Yet
they wouldn't do that. We have got to educate
them all over again, I suppose.

McKee:

I don't mean to prolong this thing, but I
think it would be interesting to you. These
bankers have got themselves into a habit that
they don't subscribe, they buy after the issue

98

-6is out, and the so-called underwriters, the
dealers and so on, furnish them with their
bonds just through the market. Otherwise,

if they had an opportunity - I don't know

Eccles:

that this is the issue to do it, but sooner
or later I think you ought to consider it.
Well, is it your - did you have any objection
to leaving the issue open an extra day on new
subscriptions for small subscribers?

H.M.Jr:

Well, it is the first time it has been brought
up. I don' have any --

Bell:

We intend to put into the bond the provision
that they can subscribe for five thousand
dollars and take it registered for 90 days the
same as we did on the other bond issue.

H.M.Jr:

How long do you give them on that?

Bell:

We haven't given them any extra time, I don't
believe, on that. We discussed it once and
some thought that it was wrong and others

felt that it might be a good thing, so we
eliminated it for further discussion later on,
and it never came to any conclusion. I don't
know that it would do a bit of harm leaving
that open an extra day for a cash subscription
on the five thousand limit.

Eccles:

That is what I suggested, that it wouldn't do
any harm, and it may cover some of these

little subscribers and especially where the
time is against them.
H.M.Jr:

I am willing to do that.

Bell:

It might cover a lot of the banks in the territories John mentioned.

99

-7-

McKee:

And you are getting into a cash coupon. It

is going to bring in an interest that you

haven't seen here for some time, that "X"
amount. They are not going to pay so much

attention to your maturity as they are that
cash coupon.

H.M.Jr:

We can give them an extra day for the five

Eccles:

Yes. You accept subscriptions in full up to

Bell:

That is right, we lock the full.

H.M.Jr:

We will give those fellows an extra day. What

thousand.

five thousand?

do you think, Jesse?

Jones:

Sounds all right to me. Desirable.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Now, we are working backward. The
notes we will keep open just two days, though.

Bell:

Exchange, yes.

Eccles:

Yes, I think that the way they are held there

would be no point in keeping them open longer.

I was thinking of what we did last time.

H.M.Jr:

Now, see if we are together. For the exchange
of the note, we were thinking of the bond and
reopening the two-year note which we offered
before.

Eccles:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

Two years, three quarters of one per cent. We

only sold thirty million of it, but it was very
useful. It helped stiffen the whole thing.
Jones:

Leave that open?

100

-8-

H.M.Jr:

Yes, reopen it.

Eccles:

That is on the refunding.

H.M.Jr:

That is on the refunding. Are you fellows

McKee:

Yes.

Eccles:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Now, the only difference is this. On this

together on that?

two and a half, we were thinking of a 10-12

year, the 15th of March, 51-53. Now, this -Bell:

Fifty-two --

H.M.Jr:

I mean 52-54. I misspoke myself.

Eccles:

You had me scared for a minute.

H.M.Jr:

Well, he changed sheets of paper on me.

Hadley:

Those are revised quotations.

Bell:

Here is your sheet here. You have got hold of
the wrong sheet.

H.M.Jr:

I have got three sheets now. This is the sheet
I was working from. Changed sheets on me.
52-54. The reason - this morning when we

started - just get this - everybody was arguing
with us that we couldn t sell more than three
hundred millions for cash, but they said 54-56,

some of them, and I had a great time arguing
with the people in New York that we - the United

States Treasury could sell five hundred million
and the people would take them. Well, then,
I began to call up a few customers. I said,
"I don't want you to price them; I want to
know, will you buy them." And enough told me

101

-9that I sold the issue over the telephone,

a couple of times over. I said, "I just
wanted to know how much will you buy."
Well, then I was satisfied, but I still
feel that I would like that extra cushion
after what I went through three weeks ago.
Now, there is about 10 or 12 thirty-seconds.
Bell:

Ten or twelve thirty-seconds.

McKee:

Do you think that is a market expression
predicated on maturities and not enough of
consideration given to this increase to two and
a half per cent and bringing in the demand
that you haven't had because you haven't had
two and a half per cent bonds?

H.M.Jr:

I don't know. Now, we were very conservative

last time, and it saved our skins, you see.

We would have been under water. This time I

would still like to be on the conservative
side. I mean, if these people this morning

can argue - now, all these people we talked to
this morning said, "You mustn't sell more than

three hundred million for cash." This afternoon they say, "Oh, go out," I am not talking
about you people - 'five hundred million. Let
her go." I can't change that fast.
McKee:

No, you can't. They are either right in the
first place, or they are right the second
time. If you get two opinions in the same
day, there is something wrong.

H.M.Jr:

I can't change that fast before lunch and
after lunch.

Eccles:

Was that the New York bank point of view?

Bell:

No, they were reflecting what they got from
the Street.

102
- 10 -

H.M.Jr:

I say I can't change so fast before lunch

McKee:

Well, our country is in a hell of a shape if
the people are not going to buy a two and a
half per cent bond for twelve or fourteen

H.M.Jr:

and after lunch.

years. I think they will do it.
I do too, but the trouble is a lot of these

dealers got burned the last time and they are

very, very blue, and they reflect it.
Eccles:

They are not in the red, any of them, over

the year now. They are doing all right.

H.M.Jr:

They lost a lot of money - no, this last time.

Eccles:

Yes, this last time, but my God, they don't

expect to make a cleaning every time, do they?

H.M.Jr:

No, but they are perfectly willing to take
it out on me. How far apart are we on our --

McKee:

One year.

Eccles:

One year is all.

H.M.Jr:

No, as to our estimates.

Bell:

What do you price the 52-54, Piser?

Piser:

I have a range of par and three quarters to
101 and a half. Par and three quarters was
being just as pessimistic as I could be.

H.M.Jr:

To what, Piser?

Piser:

One hundred one and a half.

McKee:

That is a spread of one and a quarter. It is

103
- 11 -

a lot, isn't it?
Piser:McKee:

Eccles:

That is a spread of three quarters of a
point.
Three quarters.

And that is figuring nine-tenths of the full
tax equivalent, which is a - if this was a
lower-yield security, it seems to me you would

be justified in figuring that much of the
tax equivalent, but your market for these securities is with those institutions that don't

pay taxes, pretty largely, insurance companies

and the mutual savings. At least they will be

among
an
issue.your biggest customers in this kind of
H.M.Jr:
Eccles:
H.M.Jr:

Well, the savings banks were the only people
that came to our rescue last time.
On the two's?

Yes. They saved our lives. They came down
here,
and they
our lives
last wanted
time. a 51-53 and they saved

McKee:

Mr. Secretary, have you any - probably this is
a question for your boys - are you fearful that
shorting your maturity on your two and a half,
that
you
are not going to put further pressure
on
your
two's?
H.M.Jr:

Well, I will be awfully honest with you. I
want to make this issue go. I think I need

this much velvet, and I am not thinking about
the other two's. Is that an honest answer?

McKee:

H.M.Jr:

Sure.

It gives you my honest opinion.

104
- 12 -

Eccles:

In other words, you don't care so much even if

H.M.Jr:

I am sure they will.

Eccles:

The two's may go down pretty close to par, then.

H.M.Jr:

Well, if they do then I can't help it but --

Eccles:

What would you think --

H.M.Jr:
Eccles:

H.M.Jr:

they trade out of the two's to go into this?

I told -if
.....the original subscribers it only cost
them par, so if it stays at par or better there
is no kick coming, is there, Jesse?

Jones:

I would take the 51-53.

H.M.Jr:

That is what the savings bank fellows said.

Jones:

I am conservative like a savings bank fellow.

I do it on this theory, Henry, that you - it

would be nice for them to go on up and be
strong, because you are going to have to come
again.
H.M.Jr:

And again and again.

Jones:

And again and again, and the two's will take care
of themselves. Let these go on up.

Eccles:

Except, Jesse, what you are doing, you are

giving almost half a point more, or if you

give them a 51-53 you have only got a threeyear longer maturity and you are raising the

rate from two to two and a half, which is

pretty - which is awfully sweet for that - I
think four is - four-year spread is plenty.

105
- 13 -

I would prefer to see five.
McKee:

You do that, and your next issue is going
to be two and three quarters.

Eccles:

These fellows are going to keep on pushing
you as long as they can.

H.M.Jr:

Well, they haven't been very succesful at

it. I don't lose sight of the fact that there

hasn't been a succesful flotation in I don't
know when. I don't know when there has been

a successful flotation for new money.
McKee:

You mean outside the Government?

H.M.Jr:

Outside the Government. I don't know when

was the last one. It has been a hell of a
while, anyway.

Eccles:

Piser, what are some of the recent --

H.M.Jr:

For new money.

McKee:

Republic was pulled off the Street.

Eccles:

But the way they priced some of that stuff was

terrific. These latter flotations have been

priced on a lower yield basis than even Govern-

ments.
H.M.Jr:

I know, but as the President said, we are just
supposed to be a bunch of amateurs, but I can't
report even one failure.

Jones:

Well, I would vote for the top ones.

H.M.Jr:

Which is your top one there?

Bell:

Fifty-one--fifty-three.

106
- 14 -

Jones:

H.M.Jr:

Fifty-one--fifty-three.
I am talking 52-54, and they are talking

53-55.

Jones:

I would go --

H.M.Jr:

On the conservative side?

Jones:

I would take the 51-53.

Eccles:

Of course, the lower you go, the more you

Jones:

You are going to pay the same interest anyway.

Eccles:

What is it?

Jones:

You are going to pay the same interest anyway.

McKee:

Jones:
McKee:

give the distributors.

The fall-off is going to be a little different.
"hat fall-off?
Any new money that you are going to get. If
this was the last five hundred million you
were going to borrow, I could agree with you,
too.

Bell:

It makes that three years a little expensive,
48-51. Four is bad enough, but I think it is
a cushion that is rather desirable at this time.

Eccles:

What would you think of the Fed, say later in
the week or the first of next week, if those
two show some weakness - because there may be

this switching of them - if we would consider
exchanging some of the tax-free securities we
have got for some of those two's? I mean, a
switching operation which would tend to support
the taxable two's and the market seems to be

107
- 15 -

stronger for the tax-free securities, and

we thought possibly having increased the

portfolio we might do that and help the
market for the two's if there is any shifting
from the twds and half into the two's. Just
think about it.

McKee:

Marriner, I don't believe we ought to do that
unless the Treasury would see fit to join us
with your trust funds and go 50-50.

Eccles:

Well, I think it is up to - I just mentioned
it.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I seriously doubt whether the Treasury
ought to sell any more tax exempts.

Eccles:

Yes, I think that is right.

H.M.Jr:

Now, we have got a couple of billion dollars
worth of tax exempts for our trust funds, and
I can't see the difference of selling those
to the public or issuing some new ones.

Eccles:

Not a bit. Of course, that same argument would
apply to us except from a market operation.

H.M.Jr:

True, but I just wonder whether you want to do

Eccles:

We wouldn't want to do it from a yield point
of view. We wouldn't want to do it unless it
was advisable from a standpoint of helping
stabilize the market situation.

H.M.Jr:

What I would rather do, until we had time to
really sit down and talk it out, would be
that you would sell - if you needed some cash,
would be to sell some of these rights that

it unless --

you have got. I don't know how many you have
got of these.

108
- 16 -

McKee:

Fifty-eight million.

H.M.Jr:

I would rather see you sell fifty million

of the rights and put that money there against
buying some twos or even this -McKee:

Or even switch what you get for two's.

Eccles:

Well, that is all right, yes. I wasn't --

H.M.Jr:

Do I make myself plain?

Mchee:

Yes, I think that is all right.

H.M.Jr:

I would rather have you sell some of these

Eccles:

You mean the short term. That is what the
rights really amount to.

McKee:

Mr. Secretary, we are going to put a load by

rights --

doing that on your secondary market.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am not afraid of that, and if you men

want to - say fifty million in the kitty, so
to speak, for next week, to use either for

the new bond or for the one we sold three
weeks ago, why then you would have fifty million
there.

Eccles:

Yes, we could do t hat.

H.M.Jr:

And we would be glad to match you in that.

McKee:

That is what I had in mind. I think we ought
to go along that thing.

H.M.Jr:

Oh, I do.

McKee:

And cut off at the same time, if and when.

109

- 17 -

H.M.Jr:

Now, we have the money on hand for - both
in Postal Savings and in FDIC, so we would

be glad to put up fifty million either for

the old two's or for the new two and halfs.
In fact, I would be glad to put up a hundred
million.
million. I would be glad to put up a hundred
McKee;

Then with that potential buying power, and

with us with fifty-eight million - with your

notes, only five hundred million of new money,
I would certainly hate to blacken your future
record by shortening this maturity too much.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I will tell you, John, the thing that I
went through three weeks ago was so damned

uncomfortable that I want those extra ten or

twelve points. I don't like to make a
prophecy, but I am pretty sure that the thing
is going to go and go well this time, but

God, it was too damned uncomfortable last time.

McKee:

If the dealers got caught the last time they
are going to be cautious this time. Half of
one per cent is going to mean an awful lot

in their picture.

H.M.Jr:

I am as confident as I can be that the thing

is going to go and go well. I mean, it will
go up but after all, without trying - I don't
want to rub it in. The Fed last time figured
the thing wrong, and if we had taken their

figures, we would have been under water, and

it just scares me because I could be wrong

this time, and you could be right. We are

all human.
McKee:

Well, I have been wrong more than I have been

right.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I don't know.

110
- 18 -

McKee:

So you are on the safe side.

H.M.Jr:

And here is old Jesse Jones, who is below
both of us.

Jones:

I don't think it matters how sweet it is,

since you are going to pay two and a half

per cent.
McKee:

That is what I figure now, Jesse. That means
something to me.

Jones:

Yes, and you want it to go with a bang and

you want it to be good. I don't think it is

going to depress any other bond. I don't
think it necessarily is going to increase the
rate on your next one. But if you have got

your mind made up to pay two and a half, I
would stop on the 10-12 year.
H.M.Jr:

Well, unless anybody gets very excited - we
have worked awfully hard on this - we would
like to do the 52-54 on the 15th of March.

All right?

Eccles:

I think that is a good compromise. Jesse
goes 51-53 and we go 52-54, so you go right
in between them.

McKee:

We are just putting this other out on the

table for your information, that is all.

H.M.Jr:

And as I understand it - I am going Thursday

night, but I will leave orders here with Dan
to go up to a hundred million dollars either
on the two or renew two and a half, with you
people putting up a hundred.

McKee:

Of
course, ours will be a switching proposition.

111
- 19 -

Eccles:

In so far as the operation is concerned, we
can either carry a switching operation or
increase our portfolio, we can put up half

of it, or we can put up all of it. It isn't

a question of limitation with us.
H.M.Jr:

Well, I think I would like to - wha tever you

do on this thing, I think it is good for the
public that the Treasury and the Federal
Reserve go 50-50.

Eccles:

Well, you have got the funds to invest, so it
is a good time to do it.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Eccles:

The time to invest funds is when the market

H.M.Jr:

You and I may argue about ideologies of
finance, but when we have to put the dollar

is weak and not when it is strong, isn't it?

on the line, if we are together, that is important.

McKee:

Well, Marriner, you will have to take it up

with your committee, of course. You (Secretary)
understand that.

H.M.Jr:

Oh yes, I understand that.

Eccles:

Well, I don't think there will be any question.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you might let me know tomorrow. Jesse,
when do they offer these Arkansas bonds of
yours?

Jones:

When did they?

H.M.Jr:

Well, I gather that you sold some this morning. Now, they don't buy these for an investment. When do they re-offer them to the
public?

112
- 20 -

Jones:

Thirty-five million are being offered today.

H.M.Jr:

Today?

Jones:

This morning, by Chase. Fifteen million will

be offered on April 1 by Stewart.

H.M.Jr:

I thought you were going to do this last week.

Jones:

Well, we were working on it last week. It
just came to a head.

H.M.Jr:

But there will be - will there by any public
offering tomorrow?

Jones:

Today, thirty-five million.

H.M.Jr:

Thirty-five million?

Bell:

Do you know how it went?

Jones:

It is going all right.

Bell:

Going all right?

Jones:

Yes.

Eccles:

On what basis, Jesse, were they offered? On
what basis are they offering them?

Jones:

About three yield.

Eccles:

About a three. They are totally tax exempt,
too, aren't they?

Jones:

Yes. Three, two is the rate, or three, one,
nineteen, and they paid us a premium of one

and a half points, and they add two points to

the syndicate for selling. That is three and
a half. That is a little under three per cent

yield.

113
- 21 -

Eccles:

I don't believe that will be competitive at
all with this financing, because it is
entirely a tax-free security and it will
go to an entirely different market.

Jones:

There are two different markets, anyway.

Eccles:

Than these taxable?

Bell:

I hope sometime it doesn't interfere. Gener-

ally speaking, it doesn't interfere, but I

hope sometime it doesn't.
H.M.Jr:

All right, thank you.

114

March 18, 1941
2:31 p.m.
H.M.Jr:
Jesse

Hello, Jesse.

Jones:

How are you?

H.M.Jr:

Oh, I've been busy and I see you've been
busy.

J:

Yeah, doing a little business.

H.M.Jr:

I see. When do those go on the market?

J:

They went on this morning.

H.M.Jr:

I see.

J:

I called you earlier this morning when I
read in the paper about yours and I got
Dan, I didn't get you.

H.M.Jr:

He told me.

J:

He said it wouldn't bother you; it might
bother the other fellow.

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

J:

What is your plan? Have you announced
yours yet?

H.M.Jr:

No. Eccles and his gang are coming over

J:

That ought to go all right, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

I think 80. On the exchange we'd give
them the offer of the bond or the same
note that we did last time.

J:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

What happened to the syndicate? Have they
re-offered them today?

J:

here - they're due here now. We're thinking
of a 2% bond 11 to 13 years.

(Laughs). Well, I've had a monkey and a pair of toms

in hereit. for three days. I'11 have to tell you
about

115

-2H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

Because it has really been - it's been
more than three days - four or five days.
Last night I finally reached an agreement
with them about 7:00 o'clock. Did you

J:

get a copy of my release?

H.M.Jr:

No.

J:

I sent it over there not long ago. What

H.M.Jr:

Right now.

J:

Why don't you invite me over?

H.M.Jr:

I've been waiting for you. Come on over.

J:

Because I'm going to leave town tomorrow

time are you meeting with Marriner?

for ten days and I'd like to come down

and have a word with you.
H.M.Jr:

Come over right away.

J:

I'11 be right over.

H.M.Jr:

You can come over and help me listen to
Marriner.

J:

Fine.

H.M.Jr:

Come on.

116

March 18, 1941

Mr. . Jesse Jones was here and he asked me

about his introducing legislation which would make

it legal for him to lend money against British secur-

ities or properties. I asked him not to do anything

about it until the $7, 1000,000,000 appropriation had

passed. He agreed to that, and then he said in view
of my testimony in regard to British assets and the fact

that I was handling the whole matter, he would do nothing

until after the legislation passed before discussing the
matter with me.

117

March 18, 1941
2:35 p.m.
Captain

Callaghan:

Hello, Mr. Secretary. I'm sorry to

H.M.Jr:

Go ahead.

interrupt you.

But you wanted some information on the

C:

shipping methods from the British Ministry
in connection with the routing of convoys.

You made an inquiry that came back to the
Navy Department on the thing.
H.M.Jr:

C:

Well, not the routing. The President
asked me Friday a week ago to look into
this whole convoy thing as a result of a
letter that Stimson had got from exPresident Hoover, and the President asked
me to look into the whole thing for him.
I see. Well, now, Mr. Secretary, we've
just had three officers who have been up
there looking into that whole matter and
they've made a complete report on it.

Would that fill the bill? They've got the
system.
H.M.Jr:
C:

H.M.Jr:

Well, if I could see it - after I read it
I could say whether it does or not.
I see.

But the President at Cabinet Friday a week
ago asked me to look into the whole thing

for him. If you'll send it over to me -

C:

H.M.Jr:
C:

how long is it?
Well, suppose I have them send it over to
you, sir.
How long is it?

I don't know definitely, but I think it is
five or six pages long.

H.M.Jr:

Well, if they'11 send it over and deliver
it to Lieutenant Stephens in my outer
office, I'd like very much to see it.

118

-2-

All right, sir. I'll do that.

C:

H.M.Jr:

Not only - it was the whole question of
the loading and the turn-around. That's
what he was interested in. See?

C:

I see.

H.M.Jr:

And then the suggestion was made that

they might form their convoys close off
our shore rather than going up to Halifax
and have another wait there.

C:

I see. Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

But I'd be glad to read it and see whether

C:

All right, sir. I'll have them send it

it fills the bill.

over to you right away.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

C:

Right, sir.

119

March 18, 1941
3:30 p.m.

RE

AID TO BRITAIN

Present:

Mr. Young

Mr. Foley

Mr. Cochran

Mr. Bell

Mrs. Klotz

Mr. Cox

H.M. Jr:
Young:

Now, where is the great Oscar?

He wrote up two drafts of the letter of which
I have copies here, and he is now writing a
third one, I think, which ought to be ready.

H.M.Jr:

He was going to have it in twenty minutes
this morning. When did we see him, around
10:00 or 11:00 o'clock?

Klotz:

That was the first one. This is the third.

H.M.Jr:

I understand when they say twenty minutes,

you should say fifteen, and you will get a
good letter.

Young:

As long as he isn't here, I will show you

mine. (Attachment 1 unavailable.)

H.M.Jr:

What time were you here with him when he said

Young:

It was about 12:00.

he would have it in about twenty minutes?

120

-2-

H.M.Jr:

This is yours?

Young:

Yes, I wrote one.

H.M.Jr:

My heavens!

"Dear Harry: In connection with the decision
that was reached yesterday, I would like to
make it clear that the Treasury has no
responsibility as to new orders placed by the
British after March 15 or pursuant to that
decision. As it is, you know, I am sympathetic to the matter which was discussed, and
I make this statement in order that there can
be no possible misunderstanding between you
and me."

(Mr. Cox entered the conference.)
H.M.Jr:

From now on, when you say twenty minutes, I am

going to say ten.
Cox:

McCloy was on the phone, and I couldn't get
him off.

H.M.Jr:

I don't care for this draft.

Cox:

I have got three different versions here.

H.M.Jr:

So that you people can be moderately intelligent and helpful, I want you all to know the

different reasons. There are three different

versions here?
Cox:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

How long have you been working for me, to come

in with three different versions? Anyway, the
point is, yesterday morning - it goes back to
Sunday or Saturday. I got this idea that,

121
3

beginning with Monday, they ought to

Lend-Lease all their orders, you see, in
various stages, so they didn't have to pay

any more cash beginning with the 17th, the

British. We won't go through all the

various stages that it has happened in.
Monday, Hopkins said would I talk to the
President at lunch and ask him if they placed

300 million dollars worth of orders in the

next two weeks, 20 per cent down, that when

the seven billion dollar bill passed, the

British would be reimbursed out of the seven

billion for that, you see. The President

said, "Yes." Then I stopped by to see Harry
in his room, and he wanted to know whether I
could immediately see Purvis, and I said, "No,"
I had my financing. So he said he would send
for Purvis, and I said, "You had better send

for Phillips." Which he did, and put this

thing up to them, and they agreed that they

would go ahead and do this thing and when the

seven billion dollar thing passed, they would

be reimbursed.

Then I got to worrying about the different
remarks that Harry dropped, would they or

wouldn't they. I wasn't there yesterday

afternoon when they met. I don't know what
they said. Cox and Young weren't there. So

the agreement was made in which Hopkins kept

referring to me as though I was part of it,
but I don't know what it is, and I don't know
what the reservations are, and I have been

trying to get this thing finished as of the
15th, and then Hopkins would handle it on new
orders. So this morning I called up both
Phillips and Purvis, and I said, "Just so

there will be no misunderstanding, whatever
arrangements you enter into with Hopkins have
my sympathetic support, but I am in no way
responsible, so you have got to look to Hopkins

122

to be reimbursed out of the seven billion.
Don't look to me. Because," I said, "as
far as - I have got along with you fellows,

and if I take the sole responsibility - I

will see you through," that is what I said
to myself - but I am not going to have a

joint responsibility and then have Hopkins

say, "Well, 50 million of this the Army

objects to, so we can only reimburse you to

250." They have been assured on the 300.

The clinch is, I want to write a letter to

Harry squarely placing the responsibility on
him before he leaves tomorrow. I will gamble

with anybody that when they come back there are

going to be a lot of disagreeable things about
this, and the English are going to have great
trouble getting their 300 million back, and I
don't want anything to do with it, and I want
to wash my hands clean and stay clean, and I
want everybody in the Treasury to have no part

of the responsibility for this, because I am
sure there is going to be trouble. That is
the background.

Now these men have been at this thing since
when this morning?
Cox:

Eleven o'clock.

H.M.Jr:

And they come in with three letters. What
would you do with them?

Cox:

I would recommend the top one if you feel the
same --

H.M.Jr:

You know what I call them? "The Harry Hopkins
Bedroom Boys."

(Laughter.)
Foley:

What are the English going to do while Harry is

123

-5away?

H.M.Jr:

What?

Foley:

What are the English going to do while Harry is
away?

H.M.Jr:

You will have to ask Harry that. The point is,

they are not going to come here, because I have

tried now nicely - I have said it so often they

most likely think I have something hidden in
meaning, but I don't think they do, because they

know me so well. "I will take from the President of the United States, as his agent, full
responsibility of looking after the English, but
I will not share that with anybody outside who isn't in the Treasury," and that is what I
am trying to make plain.

I mean, I will take the full responsibility or
none, but I will not share it, because it is
too delicate. It is all by word of mouth. It

is just like Jones said, well, he didn't remember
that he wasn't to sell any Arkansas this week

but last week. He just forgot about it. Well,

Harry may forget. He might say, "Well, you know,
we couldn't do anything that the Army doesn't
want to approve, so if you have got 303 ammuni-

tion in there for ten million dollars and 25
will be guns for the English, and all the rest
of that stuff, and so forth.
This is the one you want me to sign?

Cox:

I would recommend the top one if you want to put

it as strongly as you put it this morning.
(See Attachment 2.)

"Dear Harry: So that there can be no possible

misunderstanding between you and me, my clear

understanding is that the Treasury is in no way
responsible for any orders placed by the British
after March 15, 1941."

124
6-

You see, I will use Treasury. That would
mean any Treasury employee, wouldn't it?

"I was and am sympathetic to the matter which
was discussed yesterday. I do, however, want

to point out that the Treasury has no duty
in the execution of the decision that was

reached yesterday and no obligation as to new

orders placed by the British after March 15th."

Well, that is pretty ambiguous. Would that
be clear to you?

Foley:

That is a little strong, isn't it? I mean,
the tone of that --

H.M.Jr:

That is the feeling I have, that the tone is
pretty strong.
I didn't write it that way.

Cox:

Well, that was the substance of what you said.

Young:

It is almost word for word.

H.M.Jr:

No, sir. Mrs. Klotz took it down, and she

Klotz:

Shall I get it?

H.M.Jr:

Please. This is No. 2?

Cox:

Well, that is substantially the same. The
one that is softest in tone is the last one.

Cox:

can read it.

(See Attachment 4.)
H.M.Jr:

"My dear Harry: I am sympathetic to the decision reached yesterday on the problem of the

British orders, and I will, of course, be glad
to help its execution in any way which I

reasonably can. However, I do want to make it
clear, in order to avoid any misunderstanding,

125
7-

that the Treasury is in no way responsible

for any orders placed by the British after

March 15, 1941.
Foley:

That is better.

H.M.Jr:

I didn't say anything about "I am sympathetic."

Bell:

You have to say that sympathetic part.

H.M.Jr:

No.

Bell:

Couldn't you state it that "in order to avoid
all possible confusion? I think it should

be made clear that the British representatives,
after March 15, should contact you on all
future orders.
H.M.Jr:

We asked for that in a letter to the President, and we got nowhere.

Bell:

That is saying another thing, only putting

it on the British instead of saying that the

Treasury should have no responsibility. Does
this come as a shock to Harry? He knows all
about it, doesn't he?
Cox:

Oh, he knows what the problem is.

Young:

This represents our understanding of something

that has already been done. It is a confirma-

tion.
Klotz:

I can't find it.

Cox:

I have got it right in my pocket.

Young:

You remember it.

Cox:

"So there can be no possible misunderstanding

126

-8between you and me, the Treasury is in no
way responsible for any orders placed by

the British after March 15."

H.M.Jr:

That is verbatim so far?

Cox:

Yes. That was all you said. Then you said
to --

H.M.Jr:

I didn't say anything about I am sympathetic

Cox:

No, but you said to put it together --

H.M.Jr:

I didn't say that.

Bell:

You said it in your telephone conversation with

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Bell:

You can put it on the other ground, too.

to this.

Purvis.

You can say that "I have advised Purvis and

Phillips that the Treasury will have no
responsibility in the placing of orders for
the British after March 15. They should deal
directly with you and not through my Treasury

officials.

H.M.Jr:

I think that is smart.
"Dear Harry: So there can be no possible mis-

understanding between you and me, I have today
communicated by telephone with Mr. Arthur

Purvis and Sir Frederick Phillips that they
should look to you as the sole authority in
connection with placing all future orders
after March 15."

Young:

I don't think that does the job.

Bell:

You don't?

127
9-

Young:

No, because I think Mrs. Klotz is abso-

Cochran:

May I try this, Mr. Secretary?

H.M.Jr:

Yes, go ahead.

Cochran:

"Dear Harry: Please accept my sincere thanks

lutely right. It doesn't put the responsibility where you want to put it.

for your receiving Messrs. Purvis and Phillips

yesterday.

"I feel that this meeting should represent the
institution of a new system whereunder the

responsibility of handling British orders
should be definitely transferred to you alone.
With this thought in mind, I have advised
Phillips and Purvis accordingly."

Bell:

That is a diplomatic way of putting it.

H.M.Jr:

Does that relieve me of this order business?

Cochran:

If it constitutes the institution of a new system, I think it would.

H.M.Jr:

Now this thing here, "So there can be no
possible misunderstanding, the Treasury is
in no way responsible for any British orders
placed after March 15."

I don't think it does.

I could say, "In view of your departure tomorrow,
I want to have a clear-cut understanding with
you."

The way I have got it now, I have just cut this
out. So there can be no misunderstanding

between you and me, the Treasury is in no way

responsible for any orders placed by the

British after March 15."

128

- 10 -

"I do, however, want to make it clear that the
Treasury has no duty in the execution of the
decision that was reached yesterday and no

responsibility as to the new orders placed
by
British after March 15 or pursuant to
thatthe
decision."

Young:

I think it is all right the way it is.

Young:

Just cutting out "I was sympathetic."
If you want to.

H.M.Jr:

Yes, I think that weakens it.

Bell:

Do you want to speak of a misunderstanding
between you and Harry? You could say, "In
order to avoid confusion and possible misunderstanding," and leave out "between you

H.M.Jr:

and me." "I want to make it clear that the
Treasury has no responsibility."

H.M.Jr:

Say that again, Dan.

Bell:

"In order to avoid confusion and possible
misunderstanding, I want to make it clear
that the Treasury has no responsibility.

H.M.Jr:

I will just take that down. Say it again,

Bell:

"In order to avoid confusion and any possible

slowly. I will write it.

misunderstanding _" now drop down to your
second paragraph where you begin, "I want to

make it clear, and so forth.
H.M.Jr:

"I want to make it clear" -- "I want to make

it perfectly clear?"
Bell:

Clear is all right. I think clear is all

129

- 11 -

right.
H.M.Jr:

"Perfectly?"

Bell:

Well, that is a little sharp.
All right.

H.M.Jr:

"I want to make it clear that the Treasury
has no duty in the execution of the decision

which was reached yesterday." "Between you decision that was reached yesterday between

you and" -- I will put it, "Arthur Purvis and
Frederick Phillips, and no responsibility" -

I think that is - let's see.

"In order to avoid confusion and any possible
misunderstanding, I want to make clear that

the Treasury has no duty in the execution of

the decision which was reached yesterday between you and Arthur Purvis and Sir Frederick

Phillips and no responsibility as to new
orders placed by the British after" - you said
that once before. Oh no, you were going to
change it, weren't you? You started out this

way.

Bell:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

I think that is all right

Bell:

Just one paragraph.

H.M.Jr:

I think that is all right.
"Dear Harry: In order to avoid confusion or
any possible misunderstanding, I want to make

it clear that the Treasury has no duty in the

execution of the decision which was reached
yesterday between you and Arthur Purvis and

Sir Frederick Phillips and no responsibility

130
- 12 -

as to new orders placed by the British
after March 15 or pursuant to that decision."
That is a clean-out statement. What?
Cox:

Yes.

Klotz:

I am not too crazy about that.

H.M.Jr:

But it says what I want to say. I think that

Foley:

It is all right.

H.M.Jr:

That says what I want to say, doesn't it?

Foley:

It is perfectly clear.

Bell:

That doesn't sound sharp, does it?

Foley:

No, I don't think it sounds too sharp. It is

is all right. Ed?

a moderate tone.

Klotz:

I would rather have some other way of introducing it.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I could say--

Foley:

You could - "As I am leaving."

H.M.Jr:

No, "I am writing--"

Foley:

"As I am leaving at the end of the week."

H.M.Jr:

No. "I am writing you this letter because
you are leaving town tomorrow afternoon.

Foley:

Well, I mean if you put it the other way and

say, "As I am leaving town tomorrow afternoon."

131

- 13 -

Cochran:

Say, "Since we are both leaving town this

week."

Foley:

All right, "Since we are both leaving town."

Bell:

Is there any way of saying, "Confirming my
telephone conversation with you today"?

H.M.Jr:

No. I didn't say that.

Bell:

I see.

H.M.Jr:

Why not try it, "Since we are both leaving

Young:

The point isn't that you are leaving town, the
point is that you have gone on to a lend-lease

town this week."

basis.

H.M.Jr:

That is r ight.

Foley:

Well, that is perfectly true, Phil, but --

H.M.Jr:

I think this is all right.
Take this.
"Dear Harry:

"In order to avoid confusion and any possible
misunderstanding, I want to make it clear that
the Treasury has no duty in the execution of

the decision that was reached yesterday between

you and Mr. Arthur Purvis and Sir Frederick
Phillips and no responsibility as to new orders
placed by the British after March 15 or pursuant
to that decision.
Sincerely yours.

(The Reporter left the room with the notes

132
- 14 -

of the preceding letter for immediate
transcription.)
H.M.Jr:

I am just going to let it go. I am willing
to take the repercussion. If he doesn't
like it, he will call me up. I have begged,

I have cajoled, I have tried everything
possible to get a letter out of the President.
"Dear Harry:

"In order to avoid any possible confusion - If
that was your (Bell's) contribution. You

(Klotz) still don't like it?

Klotz:

No. I think it is important to get something
from the record, but I don't think of anything
right at the moment.

H.M.Jr:

Well, they had from 11:00 o'clock until 3:30,
and they couldn't do anything.

Do you (Foley) feel that it is a mistake?
Foley:

Well, I don't know how your relations are

with Harry. You can write that kind of a
letter and say all that without having it
so severe. You can write it in a very off-

hand and friendly way, and you still accomplish your purpose.

H.M.Jr:

Well, how would you do it? God Almighty, these
men have had since 11:00 this morning.

Cox:

I think, just guessing --

H.M.Jr:

When I ask you to do it, I consider it important. I have been on a financing all day,
and here I have been now twenty-nine minutes

trying to write a letter that I asked two

133
- 15 -

of you to write for me at 11:00. I mean,
just a half page letter. You haven't been
able to produce it in half an hour. We are
all sitting around here chewing the fat over

it.

Klotz:

I think once you read it, it will sound worse
than it did before.

Bell:

I don't think it sounds so bad. I don't know
that there is any feeling, is there? Would

you say anything about a transition period to
the Lease-Lend, from the basis we have been

operating on in the past to a Lease-Lend basis,
and in order to avoid a misunderstanding?
H.M.Jr:

No, let me think about it, will you, and when
the letter comes in, we will see.

134 2

My dear Harrys

So that there can be no possible misunderstanding between you and mo, my clear understanding

is that the Treasury is in no way responsible for any
orders placed by the British after March 15, 1941.
I was and am sympathetic to the matter which
was discussed yesterday. I do, however, want to point
out that the Treasury has no duty in the execution of
the decision that was reached yesterday and no obliga-

tion as to new orders placed by the British after
March 15th.

Sincerely yours,

Hon. Harry Hopkins
The White House.

OSC:aja

3/19/41

135

My dear Harrys

So that there can be no possible misunderstanding between you and m, the Treasury is in no

way responsible for any orders placed by the British
after March 15, 1941.
I was and am sympathetic to the matter which

was discussed yesterday. I do, however, went to make

it clear that the Treasury has no duty in the execution
of the decision that was reached yesterday and no re-

sponsibility as to new orders placed by the British
after March 15th or pursuant to that decision.
Sincerely yours,

Hon. Barry Hopkins
The White House.
OSC:aja

3/18/41

136 4

March 18, 1941.

My dear Harrys

I an sympathetic to the decision
reached yesterday on the problem of the British

orders, and I will, of course, be glad to help
its execution in any way which I reasonably can.

However, I do want to make it clear, in order
to avoid any misunderstanding, that the Treasury

is in no way responsible for any orders placed

by the British after March 15, 1941.
Sincerely yours,

Hon. Harry Hopkins
The White House.

OSC:djb

3-18-41

137

-

Seriguanted
you
to
see
3-19-41

March 18, 1941.

4 P.M.
MEMORANDUM

TO:

Secretary Morgenthau

FROM: Mr. Gaston

I have talked to Admiral Land and Huntington
Cairns has talked to Max Truitt about the attached
memorandum telling of a proposal by a man named

Herd, of Chicago, to buy all German ships in the
western hemisphere, numbering 33 or 34, for
$12,500,000, and to place them under American registry and on runs to be approved by the Maritime Com-

mission. Truit says the deal would involve delivery
of all the ships at American ports by the Germans.
There are only two German ships in our harbors now.
It would be necessary to get the approval of the

British to put the deal through.

Land and Truittmake it plain that they think
our only interest is the question whether $12,500,000

should be paid to Germany. We have told them that
we think your answer would be that it would all de-

pend on what this country gets out of it, that the
mere transfer of $12,500,000 is not particularly important
if the deal should be found to be desirable
and
feasible.

outstall

high to plips Love mug 4/'
This

Apple

138
UNITED STATES MARITIME COMMISSION
WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

March 15, 1941

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARY MORGENTHAU

A Mr. Herd of Chicago (presumably backed by a

syndicate) has submitted a proposition to buy all
German ships in the Western Hemisphere for $12,500,000.
There are 33 or 34 of these ships.
Mr. Herd has been in touch with officials in

Berlin.

Mr. Herd has been told by the Germans that they

will accept the proposition provided (1) that all
crews off these ships be repatriated to Lisbon or

Tokyo and (2) that the $12,500,000 be made available
to Germany in cash.

Mr. Herd purchased certain Austrian vessels under
somewhat analogous conditions during World War I.
Mr. Herd has been on this job for some time and has

had a number of conferences with officials of the
Maritime Commission and with officials of the State

Department and he infers to me that the matter has been
discussed by some Government official with the President.

Mr. Herd also thinks that further action on the
matter is up to me. I told him yesterday that I would
have to have clearance from you with regard to the

$12,500,000 being made available to Germany in cash.
Will you please be good enough to advise me with regard

to your reaction to this point as well as to any other
points referred to above.

Mr. Herd is under the impression that I ought to
take this matter up with the President and I have no
intention of doing so until the matter can be presented

139

-2in a clear-cut and definite fashion with proper
clearances from the Treasury Department and the

State Department.

Juny
hand.
E. S. Land
Chairman

140
GRAY

RS

Berlin
Dated March 18, 1941

Rec'd 3:11 p.m.

Secretary of State
Washington.

989, March 18, noon (Section OnE) For Treasury from
Heath.

For several months German business men have expected

price regulations which would affect not merely the price
of their products but their earnings. On November 23, 1940
an order of the Price Commissar contained the following
rather vague paragraph:

If price agreements lead to EXCESS profits on the part
of individual firms the REich Price Commissar can order

that these profits be wholly or partially paid out in the
matter determined by him.

The Price Commissar has now issued instructions which

have been widely publicized providing that enterprises whici
during wartime have made greater profits than in peace time
must (one) immediately lower prices and (two) pay to the
Government the EXCESS profits Earned since September 1,

1939. (A translation of these rather complicated instructions will be forwarded by mail.)
MORRIS

CSB

141

PARAPHRASE OF SECTION TWO OF TELEGRAM NO. 989 OF

MARCH 18, 1941, FROM THE AMERICAN EMBASSY, BERLIN

It is to be doubted whether this new combination price
deflation and excess profits tax measure will be carried
through with complete success, even with the present efficient
control by the German Government and the discipline of German
business. The Government undoubtedly, however, expects

that price reductions on articles of common use may be
achieved, and this the Government hopes may bolster the

confidence of the public in the stability of the mark's
purchasing power, and arrest the development of an inflationary
psychology.

During the past week, there has been a considerable drop

in quotations on the stock market which is attributable in
part to these instructions by the Price Commissar. However,
undoubtedly an important factor therein was the speech of
Funk, the Reich's Economic Minister - reference, telegram of
March 13, 4 p.m., no. 950 from the Embassy - in which he
announced that dividends above six percent would be subject to

prohibitive taxation, and there may have been some influence
from the adoption of the Lease Lend Bill.
The index of quotations on the Berlin Stock Exchange is
given in the BERLINER BOERSEN ZEITUNG as having declined to

179.6 on March 15; it had been 183.4 on March 8. There was

a further marked decline in stock quotations yesterday. It 1s
said that approximately 3/4 of the stocks xxxxxxxxxx listed

142
2

were quoted at the opening of the market due to the fact
that there were no buyers.
END MESSAGE.
MORRIS.

EA:LWW

143

March 18, 1941
4:13 p.m.
H.M.Jr:

Sproul and
Rouse:

H.M.Jr:

S:

H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Hello, Mr. Secretary.
Well, we've decided on the 52-54,

March 15th.

I see. Well, I think you'll have a

successful offering.
I'm sure. And the Federal Reserve - what
they're going to do - they're going to
call a meeting. We're each to put up a
$100 million to support both the 2's, the
last issue, and the new issue, if necessary.
Hello?

S:

I didn't get that last word.

H.M.Jr:

Only if necessary.

S:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

They made the suggestion, so - I mean, on

the old 2's. So I think it's all right.

O.K.T
S:

H.M.Jr:
S:

Yeah.

Well, thanks for all the help.
All right, sir. We'11 watch it tomorrow.

H.M.Jr:

Good. I'11 be here.

R. & B.:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

R. & S.:

Good bye.

144
March 18, 1941
4:25 p.m.
Harold

Ickes:

Hello, Henry.

H.M.Jr:

I'm sorry I've been 80 long in answering.

I:

That's all right. Say, Henry, who is

H.M.Jr:

Who is?

I:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

sending this grain over to France.

I don't know, Harold. I suppose Sumner

Welles.

I:

I heard it was the State Department.

H.M.Jr:

Pardon?

I:

I heard that it was the State Department.

H.M.Jr:

I've had no official notice or even a

I:

discussion with anybody other than what

I've seen in the paper.
Yeah. Well, I wasn't worried about how

you felt about it.

H.M.Jr:

Well, neither the President nor anybody in
the State Department has discussed it with
us, 80 I'm just as much on the outside as
the cop on the corner.

I:

Well, I think one thing that happened -

Henry-Haye went over to see the White House,

and then the President came in, and then
he went out and gave an interview to the

newspapers - sort of forced his hand. I
wouldn't deal with an Ambassador like that.
I'd send him home.

H.M.Jr:

As far as we know, it is not yet an accomplished
on it. fact because we've got no orders

I:

Yeah. Another thing. Do you know John
Ansel Ford in Los Angeles? He ran for
Senator on the Democratic ticket in
California?

145

-H.M.Jr:
I:

H.M.Jr:
I:

No. That isn't the Congressman is it?
oh, his name isn't Ford. What the devil
is that fellow's name?
That's the Congressman, isn't it?
Yeah. That's the Congressman. Well, I
have his name here. At any rate he ran
for Senator on the Democratic ticket in
California. He was in here yesterday.

H.M.Jr:

You don't mean Jefty O'Connor? (Laughs).

I:

No. They've elected a new District

Attorney down there and according to him
they ran across some very suspicious
circumstances involving Federal income
taxes.

H.M.Jr:

Really?

I:

Which McAdoo and Blackjack Elliot and

H.M.Jr:

I know who you mean.

I:

H.M.Jr:
I:

McAdoo's former disreputable partner what's his name - were involved.

And I thought I'd just pass it on to you,
because I know you are interested in those
things in case you want to look it up.
Sure. Have you any more details?

No, I haven't, but I think he'd be willing
to tell what he has and I think probably
you'd have to send somebody in from
Washington. They have a suspicion about
some of your people out there.

H.M.Jr:

Well, how do we get hold of this fellow?

I:

I'11 get his name for you. (Aside. Bring
me my list for yesterday. Who was in from
California to see me yesterday?) Yeah, it

was John Ansel Ford. He isn't a Congressman.

John Ansel Ford - A-n-s-e-l.

H.M.Jr:

And he has the story.

146

-3I:

He has the story. He' 8 a commissioner
out there.

H.M.Jr:

O.K.

I:

He also said that this particular case
that - I think there is some feeling that
perhaps Irey isn't the one to take it up.
It may be all cobwebby. I don't vouch for
a damn thing. I know what good work Irey
has done and the confidence you have in

him.
H.M.Jr:
I:

Yeah. He's tops.
Yeah, I know he is, but

I:

But this is just a story.
This is just a story.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I'11 have John Sullivan send for

H.M.Jr:

him.

I:

All right. Now, he may be in town still.
Well, I'll get word to John Sullivan.
Yeah. All right.

H.M.Jr:

Right-o.

I:

Good-bye.

I:

H.M.Jr:

147

March 18, 1941
4:30 pm

Present:

Mr. Foley
Mr. Cox

Mrs. Klotz

Mr. Young

(Mr. Foley reading revised letter to
Mr. Hopkins, final draft of which is attached.)

Mr. Foley: It is general and at the same
time I think it is broad enough to cover the sit-

uation without backing up on any specific instructions you have on quid pro quo.

HM,Jr: Are you satisfied?
Mr. Young: Yes.

HM,Jr: Read it again.

Mr. Foley: "Dear Harry: I think it is

important to clear up the manner in which British

orders will be handled in the future. Hence this
letter.
"It is my understanding that the handling
of all orders and other arrangements on behalf of
the British since March 15th is being done by you
and the Treasury is in no way responsible after
that time.

"If this is not in accordance with your understanding,
I hope you will let me know before you
leave town.
Yours sincerely,"

148

-2-

Mr. Cox: Could I raise one point? On

the point Phillip and I discussed. That is,

starting with the second paragraph, possibly men-

tioning that in the light of his advising you
that he has worked out arrangements with Purvis
and Phillips as to the handling of British orders
after March 15th and then go on into the rest of
it.
HM,Jr: I have nothing from him.

Mr. Cox: In his conversation with you
this morning didn't he

HM, Jr: That's all right. Let me go back.

What about that I say simply, "Harry, it has my
if
sympathetic support, but the responsibility

he calls me "the responsibility" -- the fact

that the English spent $300 000, 000, that gives me

the chance --"the responsibility is yours and not
mine and I have so advised you. He will say,
"What about that $300,000,000?" I say, "All right.
You have to see that the British get reimbursed.
It's on you and not on me because I have no contact

with the Army and no contact with the Navy. I am
not seeing the orders any more and I don't know."

Mr. Cox: That's right.
HM,Jr: So if they put in the order for the
50 kiddle-cars, I won't know it.
Mr. Cox: That's right.

HM,Jr: I think it's all right. If you be-

gin to go into it, it takes more of the form of a
legal document. This is very nice. The edges have
been filed off and if he comes back, I simply say,
"Harry, I cannot share this with you and you have

to go through with this thing. Two people can't

149
-3-

do it. If it.
he asks you (Cox), that's why I have
written
me.

I

Mr. Cox: That part is completely clear to
HM,Jr: Why have I written the letter? Because
don't know. General Burns won't tell me. He won't

tell me. The President won't tell me. And in the

$300,000,000 there will undoubtedly be things that

Stimson will not approve. Now, who will see that they
get that reimbursement? Harry Hopkins and not Henry
Morgen thau, Jr.

0-0000o-o

150

March 18, 1941

Dear Harry:

I think it is important to clear up the

manner in which British orders will be handled

in the future. Hence this letter.

It is my understanding that the handling
of all orders and other arrangements on behalf
of the British since March 15th is being done by
you and the Treasury is in no way responsible

after that time.

If this is not in accordance with your
understanding, I hope you will let me know before you leave town.
Sincerely yours,

Honorable Harry Hopkins,
The White House.

Copies to:

Mr. Bell

Mr. Foley

Mr. Cox
Mr. Young
Mr. Coehran

151

V

my > than is is

for can to la

rwillthe
Bitter adm
il be has end in

h
fortune There this
when

I is my in dustanley

the no any

Financial ? are a has you

$

by 7 A the 7 Britich is after

Man
done l 15 will weing

was my you and

to many is in

m may - mpmich

ic the with
y this is and 152
will signature you

- will h m

foundation a

and

the mim upon you leave

153

THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON

My dear Harry:

In order to avoid confusion and any possible
misunderstanding, I want to make it clear that the
Treasury has no duty in the execution of the decision
that was reached between you and Mr. Arthur Purvis

and Sir Frederick Phillips, and no responsibility
as to new orders placed by the British after March 15

or pursuant to that decision.
Sincerely yours,

Hon. Harry Hopkins
The White House.

154
THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON

My dear Harry:

So that there can be no possible misunderstanding between you and me, my clear understanding

is that the Treasury is in no way responsible for any
orders placed by the British after March 15, 1941.
I was and am sympathetic to the matter which

was discussed yesterday. I do, however, want to point

out that the Treasury has no duty in the execution of
the decision that was reached yesterday and no obliga-

tion as to new orders placed by the British after
March 15th.

Sincerely yours,

Hon. Harry Hopkins
The White House.

155
THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON

March 18, 1941.

My dear Harry:

I am sympathetic to the decision
reached yesterday on the problem of the British

orders, and I will, of course, be glad to help
its execution in any way which I reasonably can.

However, I do want to make it clear, in order
to avoid any misunderstanding, that the Treasury

is in no way responsible for any orders placed
by the British after March 15, 1941.
Sincerely yours,

Hon. Harry Hopkins
The White House.

NA
156

March 18, 1941

TO:

Mr. Sullivan

FROM:

The Secretary

Harold Iokes says a man by the name of
John Ansel Ford of Los Angeles has a story about

crooked income tax in Los Angeles. They think he
is in town.

157
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941
TO

FROM

Secretary Morgenthan
Mr. Cochran

At p.m. I received in my office Messrs. Phillips, Pinsent and Playfair of the
British Treasury, and Deputy Finance Minister Clark of Canada and his newly appointed
Financial Attache in Washington, Mr. Coynes. The Secretary had instructed me to receive these gentlemen since Under Secretary Bell was engaged in financing.

Mr. Clark referred to the promise made on his last visit that he would bring to
date certain memoranda previously submitted to us, particularly reconciling statistics

to the increased British purchasing in Canada. Mr. Clark handed to me the attached
documents. I telephoned Dr. White, but found that he was unavailable for meeting
Mr. Coynes this evening. The latter is available, however, for explaining to Mr. White
or the rest of us any details on the Canadian figures which are not clear.

Mr. Clark stressed the point that the British assistance to Canada through providing gold is no longer forthcoming and that the extent to which Canada is being of assist
ance to Great Britain through accumulating sterling is increasing. Sir Frederick
Phillips thought that this latter item would shortly be reaching a rate of $100,000,000
Canadian per month. The Canadians have made a revision of their American listed secu-

rities and other assets, revealing a present total of approximately $276,000,000 (U.S.).
Mr. Clark will raise the question as to the best means of disposing of such securities
once a reregistration and vesting thereof by the Canadian Government takes place.
Mr. Clark feels that there should be some coordination with the British effort, 80 that

the British liquidation will not be interfered with and so that our market will not

suffer from too much pressure. Canada could, according to Mr. Clark, send down to
New York a Ministry of Finance or Bank of Canada representative thoroughly familiar with
the American security market who could take charge of the liquidation.

Both Sir Frederick Phillips and Mr. Clark brought up the question of applicability

of the Lease-Lend Act to American parts and materials entering into Canadian manufactured munitions for Great Britain. Can we give them any information on this point?

Phillips also stated that the question of dollars for Canada still has not been

settled. In answer to my question as to whether United States dollars would meet
Clark's requirements as well as gold, he replied in the affirmative, since any gold
received would necessarily be used eventually in liquidating the Canadian deficit
balance with the United States.

Phillips reverted to the standing question which he has with us as to the prospect

ive deficit of $185,000,000 for the current six months. (It will be recalled that this

estimate did not include British help to Canada along the lines which had originally
been anticipated). Phillips added that this figure also contemplated that all of the
calculations made by the British Purchasing Commission with respect to the applicability
of the Lease-Lend Act might prove correct. To the extent that contemplated transactions
do not come under the Lease-Lend Act. the deficit would correspondingly rise.

158
-

In spite of the press stories indicating that Mr. Jones has reached definite
arrangements to take over $46,000,000 of British financed or owned plants, Phillips
stated that nothing at all has yet been closed with Mr. Jones. Nothing has developed
along this line to amend the data on negotiations with the R. F. C., Aray and Navy,
which Phillips presented several days ago.

With the immediate application of the Lease-Lend Act and no miscalculations on
the part of the British Purchasing Commission, there might be a saving of $80,000,000.
Phillips stated that the conversation which Purvis and he had yesterday with Mr. Hopkins
brought about no clear out and definite arrangement. The British are to go ahead,
however, making down payments on new contracts with the understanding that the Lease-

Lend people will bail them out after the legislation is in full operation. The British

were warned in turn not to include any questionable items in their purchases for which
they expect to be reimbursed.

159
March 18.
1941.)of Finance Clark of Canada to Mr. Cochran in the Treasury
(Sanded by Deputy
Minister
Memorandum on Canada's Balance of

5:30

Payments with United States

SECRET

Estimates of Canada's balance of payments with the United States for

the fiscal year April 1st, 1941, to March 31st, 1942, and the quarters thereof,
are set forth in the table attached to this memorandum. Figures are also
given for the six months March to August, 1941. The headings and items in this
table are self-explanatory and require no detailed comment. Some additional
relevant information is given in the following paragraphs.
Imports for War Purposes:

The estimated value of imports for war purposes of $428 millions during the fiscal year includes the value of imports required for British account
in Canada and for producing supplies for British account, as well as imports
for Canadian projects. The following table gives an estimated breakdown of
this division according to general categories of import requirements. Included
with the purely Canadian requirements are relatively small amounts for the
account of other Dominions.

Estimates of Requirements of United States Funds for War Purposes

in the Fiscal Year 1941-42

(millions of Canadian Dollars)
Total

United
Kingdom

For direct purchases of aircraft,
engines and parts.

For direct purchases of ships, motor
transport, ordinance & munitions.
For miscellaneous direct purchases.
For the U.S. content of war supplies
produced in Canada

94.5

48.1

Canada and
Dominions

46.4
9.4
6.2

9.4
6.2

242.2

154.0

88.2

55.7

30.5

25.2

408.0

232.6

175.4

20.0

11.4

8.6

428.0

244.0

184.0

34.6

21.1

13.5

37.5

24.0

13.5

For the U.S. content and U.S. equip-

ment of capital projects for war

production and defence construction.

Total as above

Add allowance for price increases
Total

Of the above for U.S. Content:

and
ordered
Aircraft, figures engines
parts
by contractors from U.S.

Machine tools for capital projects receiving capital assistance.

It is also estimated that of our imports of petroleum and its products about 20.5 million dollars worth will be required for war purposes,
including production of war supplies, about 17.9 million dollars worth of our
imports of coal and coke, and about 57 million dollars worth of our imports of
primary iron and steel, including rolling mill products. These items are
included in the totals in the table above.

160

The distribution between the quarters of the fiscal year of these imports for British and for Canadian war purposes isBfitish
estimated asCanadian
follows: (and other
Total

Total for fiscal year
1st quarter
2nd quarter
3rd quarter
4th quarter

Dominions)

428

244

184

87

52

35

98

59

39

117

66

51

126

67

59

181

109

72

Six months - March - Aug. 1941

It will be noted that the proportion of imports for war purposes which
for British account or for the production of supplies for Britain is subare stantially higher than in the estimates hurriedly supplied early in December when

only $75 millions of a total of $325 millions were attributed to British requirements. The earlier estimate of the division took account only of the British
share of the United States content of capital and production requirements for

projects receiving capital advances. It did not include the direct purchases

made in the United States for British account by the Canadian Department of

Munitions and Supply, including aircraft, nor the United States content of the
British purchases in Canada which were produced without capital assistance.

The many largest single item in the latter category would be motor transport.

161
(Handed by Deputy Minister of Finance Clark of Canada to Mr. Cochran in the
TreasuryEstimated
at 5:30 P.M.,
March
18. 1941.)
Canada
- United
for theStates Balence of Payments

Fiscal Year April lst,
1941, to March 31st, 1942
and
Six Months, March 1st, 1941, to August 31st, 1941

(in millions of Canadian dollars)
Fiscal Year 1941-42

Total lst.o. 2nd.e. 3rd.o. 4th.0.

Six Months
March-Aug. 1941

Payments by Canada to U.S.A.

war purposes

For imports for war
purposes. (See Note 1)
For interest and
dividends

525

127

128

155

117

255

428

87

98

117

126

181

238

68

52

67

51

121

85

19

21

25

20

40

For freight

22

10

5
5

For other miscellaneous
current items (net)

5

For tourists & travel

7

For imports for non-

12
25

7
6

6
6

512

310

373

328

619

475

117

126

121

111

235

215

51

53

55

56

104

production

152

27

82

22

21

98

(see Note 3)
For freight

55

13

15

14

13

Total

1,325

Receipts by Canada from U.S.A
For exports of
merchandize

For exports of gold

For tourists & travel

28

For interest and

Total

15
8

28

7

7

dividends

6

925

214

283

219

209

398

98

27

154

119

478

Net payments by Canada

to U.S.A. on Current
Account

141

Additional Items

Capital exports throughoutside market offsetting tourist receipts.

15
25

5

11

5

4

Bond maturities payable

in U.S.dollars held in

54

dd: net payments by
anada to other
countries outside ster10
ing area (See Note 2)
otal net requirements
y Canada of U.S.dollars 478

131

5

163

45

190

131

5

Total net payments by
Canada to U.S. including capital items above 468

28

5

45

7

U.S.A.

-2
129

7

50

-1

162

anadian dollar equivalent)

Notes on following page.

6

137

195

162

-2-

Note 1, re Imports for War purposest

These figures include estimated values of imported oil,

coal, steel, machinery, etc., required for the production of war
supplies.

Nc provision has been made in these estimates for new
capital projects which may be developed but which are not under

consideration at the present time.

Note 2. re Other Countries:
These items represent the net balance of payments of Canada

with other non-Empire countries which Canada settles in U.S. dollars.
It is mainly made up now of merchandise trade with Latin America and

Japan. The only significant "invisible" item is the amount receivable
in dividends from the International Petroleum Company.
The U.S. dollar balance of payments of Newfoundland has been

disregarded in the tabulation as negligable, at least on the basis of
experience to date.

Note 3. re Receipts from Tourist Trade:

This figure is based upon an expectation of a substantial
increase in Canadian receipts from tourists over those of the 1940
season.

163

(Handed by Deputy Treasury Minister at 5:30 of p.m., Finance March Clark 18. of 1941.) Canada to Mr. Cochran in the
SECRET

CANADIAN HOLDINGS OF U.S. DOLLAR ASSETS

A. The following are liquid assets in U.S. dollars or convertible into

U.S. dollars, held by Canada, as of February 28th, 1941.
Gold

$136 mm. U.S. (long)

.

$312 mm.

$8 mm.

"

2. Private

.

33 20 -

-Minister of Finance

$8 - U.S. (short)

.

123 -

1. Official-F.E.C.B.

.

Dollar Balances

The private holdings of $20 millions included above do not include
the cash holdings of the Canadian chartered banks or life insurance companies.

B. Canadian holdings of U.S. securities are tabulated below. This information was obtained from the registration of all foreign securities owned by
Canadian residents having total holdings of a value of $1,000 or more.
The table is based on values of listed and unlisted bonds at 31st
December, 1939, and listed stocks at 28th February, 1941. These securities were
originally valued as at 31st December, 1939. The valuation of the listed stocks
as at 28th February, 1941, was reached by revaluing the holdings of issues held
in excess of $500,000 (which accounted at end-1939 values for over 70 per cent
of the aggregate) and assuming that the prices of the balance of the stocks in
each group declined to the same extent as the revalued stocks in that group.
Listed Stocks

Listed and Unlisted

Totals

Bonds

Industrial

$189.9 mm. (U.S.)

Mines

7.7

Rails

7.8
38.9

Utilities
Investment Cos.
Insurance Cos.
Banks & Trust Cos.
U.S. Government

5.7

7.3
4.0

--

$14.4 mm. (U.S.)
7.9

7.7
15.2

15.5

54.4

Real Estate

260.8

5.7

2.0
1.3

7.3
4.0
7.0
2.0
1.3

48.1

308.9

7.0

State & Municipal

$204.3mm.(U.S)

There are approximately, 3,500 items
under unlisted stocks which it has not

been possible to value thoroughly. It
is
on the basis a

valuation
that
the
which
believed, made,
figure
of partial
at
they are entered is an outside estimate.

20.0
528.9

#

Deduct:

Sales of Stocks and Bonds,

Sept. 15/39 to Feb. 28/41 (A)
Maturities of bonds, Sept.
15/39 to Feb. 28/41

40.0
3.0

-43.0
285.9

Deduct:

-10.0

Brokers' Loans

(Footnotes on next page)

275.9mm. (U.S)

2-

164

The figures above do not include the assets of Canadian life insurance companies, banks or trust companies. The latest available figures
relating to these institutional holdings were submitted in December.
An estimate of Canadian direct investments in the United States was
also submitted in December and no later information on this is available.
Information was also provided at that time on holdings of securities of Latin
America, the total of which is so small as to make a revaluation unimportant,
and on direct investments in Latin America on which there is no later infor-

nation.

In the figures supplied in December a "rough guess" of
20 to 40 million dollars was made of the value of these

#

unlisted stocks. Since that time a detailed appraisal

has been made of all items which could be identified and
valued. The total of such items amounted to about 13.5

million dollars. On the basis of this information it is

believed that $20 million is an outside estimate.

(A)

This is the amount estimated from the receipts of the pro-

ceeds of sale of dollar securities. The figure may include
some small amount resulting from the sale of dollar
securities other than U.S. securities.

165

(Handed by Deputy Minister of Finance Clark of Canada to Mr. Cochran

in the Treasury at 5:30 p.m., March 18. 1941.)

Memorandum on Canadian - United Kingdom Balance
of Payments, 1941-42

Attached hereto is a table giving estimates of the balance of
payments between Canada and the United Kingdom for the fiscal year

April 1st, 1941, to March 31st, 1942, for the quarters thereof, and for
the six month period March to August, 1941. Estimates of the net
balance of payments of Canada with the rest of the sterling area are
added, and also the estimated net balance of Newfoundland with the
sterling area.
Estimates of these balances of payments were supplied in December

for the second year of war. The present figures take into account
developments and new information since that time. Use has been made of

estimates supplied to Canada by the British Treasury covering the six
month period March to August, 1941. The attached estimates show a

somewhat smaller net balance on current account than do the British

figures, and differences in certain of the items making up the totals.
One principal difference is in the estimates of war supplies to be sold
by Canada to the United Kingdom where the British figures appear to be

based upon different forecasts of cost prices, and possibly in different
anticipations regarding dates of delivery. The second major difference

is in the estimates of expenditure in Britain by and for the Canadian

forces there. While such expenditure is very difficult to forecast
accurately, we anticipate a substantially higher figure than that in
the British estimates.

166
ESTIMATED CANADA-UNITED KINGDOM BALANCE OF PAYMENTS

FISCAL YEAR APRIL 1. 1941 to MARCH 31, 1942
AND

6 MONTHS PERIOD MARCH 1, 1941 to AUGUST 31, 1941

Fiscal Year
1st

March 1, to

4th

3rd

2nd

Total Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

August 31,
1941

Payments to Canada

Deliveries of munitions etc. (Schedule 1)
Capital assistance
(see Note 1)

Raw materials
(Schedule 2)

Agricultural products
(Schedule 3)

803

140

181

65

33

22

318

74

80

86

78

162

269

82

85

61

41

167

233

315

249

59

1
9

R.A.F. Schools in

Canada (This estinate was supplied

27

by U.K.)

Ship disbursements and
Indemnities (See Note 2)

13

7

7

7

6

58

14

14

15

15

30

1,540

349

389

411

391

746

150

35

40

40

35

75

56

16

15

13

Payments by Canada

Inports from U.K.

Interest and dividends
(net)

Shipping services
Canadian military
expenditures

10

20

5

5
5

223

Miscellaneous services

31

12
5

70

46

99

56

51
2

4

2

2

2
8

457

104

132

111

110

219

1,083

245

257

300

281

527

49

12

12

12

13

24

Net balance on current
account:

with the United Kingdom(See Note 1)

With rest of
sterling area

Newfbundland's net

balance on current
account with

sterling area

20

10
5
5

5

5

Total net balance
on current account
(See Note 1)

1,152

Notes: 1.

262

274

317

299

561

No provision has been made in these estimates for new
capital projects which may be developed but which are

not under consideration at the present time.

2.

The United Kingdom believe this may be too low by as

much as $40 millions in the full year, or $20 millions
in the six months March 1 to August 31, 1941.

167

Canadian Holdings of Sterling Exchange

The amount of sterling balances held by Canada as at

February 28th, 1941, is as follows:
Foreigh Exchange Control Board
Spot

Futures

Total

Minister of Finance Account
Total holdings

£ 37.1 mm.
4.0

41.1 .7 .
£ 41.8 mm.

Some indication of the value of Canadian investments in the
United Kingdom and other Empire countries, and in European countries

other than the United Kingdom, was given in the estimates supplied
in December, 1940. As the amounts of these investments are relatively
unimportant and the values are largely nominal, they have not been
re-estimated.

(Sended

by Deputy Minister of Finance Clark of Canada to Mr. Cochran in the Treasury
168

5:30 this THE WAR PROGRAM AND ITS EFFECT ON THE NATIONAL INCOME

(Millions of Dollars)

Fiscal Year

Calendar Years

1941-42

1940

1939

Income Payments to Individuals and Income in Kind
Salaries & Wages
Investment Income
Agriculture

Independent Business Proprietors, Professions, etc.

All other

2,527

2,875

3,375

486

512

560

506

509

530

367

389

430

129

126

130

4,015

4,411

5,025

275

225

200

25

183

380

32

65

304

440

645

4,319

4,851

5,670

40

95

210

40

60

70

4,399

5,006

5,950

473

425

420

544

535

545

1,017

960

965

55

133

150

75

40

30

1,147

1,133

1,145

3,252

3,873

4,805

-56

+115

+408

3,196

3,988

5,213

71

549

1,450

74

265

1,087 (o)

88

65 (a)

Total

reasfer Payments and Income in Kind

Belief, Pensions and Other Public Welfare
Military - Pay and Allowances
- Food & Maintenance
Total Transfers
total Income Payments & Income in Kind

4

djustments to obtain National Income Produced
Indirect Taxes Included in Government Purchases
Undistributed Corporate Profits
National Income Produced Plus Transfers
Non-War Government Expenditures

Current Account - Dominion

- Provinces & Municipalities

Wheat

Capital All Governments
National Income Available after Non-War
Government Expenditures

at Favourable (-) or Unfavourable (+) Balance of Payments
on Current Account Excluding Assistance to Britain (a)
Total Income Available for War and Private Use
Expenditures on War

Assistance to Great Britain (b)
British Capital Assistance Program
Total War

asome Available for Private Use (d)

-

Canadian Expenditures

145

902

2,602

3,051

3,086

2,611

(b) Repatriation of securities and accumulation of sterling. This item less (a) equals
the favourable balance of payments on current account with all countries.
Assumes that no gold will be received from Great Britain, Total assistance includes

018 m. to Great Britain for exports, $65 - to Great Britain for the capital program,

$49 - on account of other sterling area countries and $20 mm. to Newfoundland.

(d) This includes not only income available for consumption but also for private capital

investment and accumulation of stocks. It excludes consumption made possible by consumption

stocks, the sale of existing capital assets to the government (such as land) which are
included in government expenditures, or the failure to make good depreciation.

United Kingdom Cash Deficiency of Canadian Dollars
September 15. 1939 to February 28,1941
TMEMTRA

SECRET

(Millions of Canadian dollars)

381

&

ee a M9 SI RAM LAC

Sept.15/39

Sept.15/39
to

to

Feb. 28/41

Feb.29/40

(17) mos.)

(5 mos.)

Aug.31/40
(6 mos.)

Net deficit (a)

736.9

115.1

Realization of assets:
Canadian Gov't securities

256.9

to

OT

Sales of vested securities
and other realizations (a)
Sub-total

45%
11%

Canada's accumulation of sterling
Total ex gold
Sale of gold to Canada

34%

Sept.1/40

Mar.1/40

to

Feb.28/41
(6 mos.)

Sept 1/40
to

Nov .30/40

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

1940

1941

1941

(3 mos.)

262.4

359.4

185.5

45.6

73.0

55.3

78.3

71.2

107.4

17.3

46.4

36.8

6.9

72.5

15.6

9.8

47.1

0.5

27.9

14.2

4.5

329.4

93.9

81.0

154.5

17.8

74.3

51.0

11.4

157.7

19.2

(1.3)

139.8

107.7

(33.8)

22.0

43.9

487.1

113.1

79.7

294.3

125.5

40.5

73.0

55.3

249.8

2.0

182.7

65.1

60.0

5.1

736.9

115.1

262.4

359.4

185.5

45.6

(a) Exclusive of unknown changes in private balances

-

73.0

-

55.3

Deputy

unds
Deficiency of
September 15. 1939 to February 28, 1941

Canada's

Cash

(Millions of U. S. dollars)

SECRET

Sept.15/39
to

Feb, 28/41
(17) mos.)

New capital inflow (a)
NET DEFICIT

Recidation of foreign assets (b)
Depletion of gold and U.S. balances

(official and private)

Sub-total: Decline in Canada's
U.S. assets

Gold received from U. K.

to

Feb. 29/40
(51 mos.)

Mar .1/40
to

Aug.31/40
(6 mos.)

Sept 1/40

Sept 1/40

Feb. 28/41

(6 mos.)

to

Dec.

Jan.

Nov 30/40
(3 mos.)

1940

1941

Feb.
1941

to

436.6

59.4

222.7

154.5

74.9

38.9

17.8

22.9

19.8

10.6

4.9

4.3

2.0

0.7

0.5

1.1

416.8

48.8

217.8

150.2

72.9

38.2

17.3

21.8

66.4

21.4

20.8

24.2

13.4

3.9

3.5

3.4

123.3

25.6

31.0

66.7

4.8

29.7

13.8

18.4

189.7

47.0

51.8

90.9

18.2

33.6

17.3

21.8

227.1

1.8

166.0

59.3

54.7

4.6

416.8

48.8

217.8

150.2

72.9

38.2

(a) Sale of Canadian securities to non-residents for U.S. funds, new
loans and direct investments, immigrants' capital, etc.

(b) Sale of foreign securities to non-residents for U.S. funds, maturities
of foreign securities payable in U.S. funds, repayment of loans,

transfers by insurance companies, realization of miscellaneous assets.

$

Net deficit (current account and
capital before allowing for
new capital inflow

Sept .15/39

-

17.3

-

21.8

171

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE March 18, 1941

TO Secretary Morgenthan
FROM V. H. Hadley

Mr. Rouse talked to Mr. Black of the Chase Bank and his

report is that the syndicate dealers have pretty well taken
all of the $35 million Arkansas bonds. Retailing is progressing

satisfactorily and, except for a few maturities, seems all right.
Outside market comment is that the issue is moving better
than slowly and as well as could be expected for what they
consider a second or third grade issue.
$20 million offering by New York City today is moving

very well on a serial basis of 1 to 15-year bonds, with a
maximum yield of about 2.36%. These bonds are rated A.

172
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON

of

THE

March 18, 1941

CHAIRMAN

Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
Washington, D. C.
Dear Henry:

Enclosed is the material about which I spoke to you yesterday on the
phone.

Our consideration of this problem runs back to last October when the Army
War College wrote us saying that they were working on a revision of their M-day
plan and asking us to make suggestions as to our agency. Our reply apparently
got through to Under Secretary Patterson, who liked it well enough to send it to
the President. Patterson suggested to the President that we proceed at once to
utilize our powers in connection with Defense.
Since that time, things have moved slowly. We did work out with Ed
Stettinius the priorities arrangement described in the attached material, and
we have been giving study to the general subject of capital funds control. But

we have taken no further specific action because we have come more and more to
the conclusion that formal coordination between the various appropriate Government agencies is necessary.

Then, as I have told you, the subject came up again in a recent luncheon

I had with Jim Forrestal. It was as a result of that discussion that we pre-

pared the enclosed material. As I told you, Jim phoned me yesterday saying he
thought it was a splendid idea and urged that we should proceed without further
delay towards setting up something along the lines we suggested.

The memorandum entitled "Capital Funds Control" is obviously a little
heavily loaded on the side of the S.E.C. I want you to know that this is simply
because we know more about the S.E.C. than we know about any other agencies and

not because we wish to grab more than our share. I believe that you should be
the Chairman of such a committee. There should, I think, be no difficulty on
that point since you are the ranking Cabinet member.
The copy of the proposed memorandum to the President which is enclosed

herewith is, of course, written from our point of view. As I think it over,
it might be better if you took the initiative. If this does not appeal to you
I would be glad to join with you or take the initiative myself -- anything you
wish.
Sincerely yours,

Jerome N. Frank
Jerome
Chairman

173

Capital Funds Control

The discussion below is confined simply to a brief examination
of some of the problems which arise in connection with consideration

of the problem of controlling capital funds for Defense purposes
together with some suggestions for meeting the problem. It is not
meant to be an economic treatise on the sources of or the mechanics

for raising capital.
Publicly issued securities
All corporate issues exceeding $100,000 must be registered

with the S.E.C. Under a recent agreement with the Priorities Board
and O.P.M. Associate Director Hillman's office, the S.E.C. has already
established certain important avenues for capital issues control.

Briefly, it has adopted the policy of clearing with the Defense

offices all registration matters involving the construction of
additional facilities or the purchase of additional machinery and
equipment. Where these Defense offices indicate that either labor
or materials are not forthcoming or may not be forthcoming because

of the Defense effort, the S.E.C. requires that this information be

prominently disclosed in the selling literature.

Of course, technically, this is not control. It relies on
the power of publicity to stop financing for the purchase of materials
and labor which are in competition with Defense needs.

Furthermore, the employment of this device is presently
premised on protection of the investor rather than on Defense

173

Capital Funds Control

The discussion below is confined simply to a brief examination
of some of the problems which arise in connection with consideration

of the problem of controlling capital funds for Defense purposes
together with some suggestions for meeting the problem. It is not
meant to be an economic treatise on the sources of or the mechanics

for raising capital.
Publicly issued securities
All corporate issues exceeding $100,000 must be registered

with the S.E.C. Under a recent agreement with the Priorities Board
and O.P.M. Associate Director Hillman's office, the S.E.C. has already
established certain important avenues for capital issues control.

Briefly, it has adopted the policy of clearing with the Defense

offices all registration matters involving the construction of
additional facilities or the purchase of additional machinery and
equipment. Where these Defense offices indicate that either labor
or materials are not forthcoming or may not be forthcoming because

of the Defense effort, the S.E.C. requires that this information be

prominently disclosed in the selling literature.

Of course, technically, this is not control. It relies on
the power of publicity to stop financing for the purchase of materials
and labor which are in competition with Defense needs.

Furthermore, the employment of this device is presently
premised on protection of the investor rather than on Defense

174
-2-

needs. This must be so, because of the character of the S.E.C.'s
statutory authority, unless and until the Commission is given special

direction (either by statute or executive order) to concern itself
directly with Defense problems.

Consideration should be given to the possibility that two or
three hundred millions of dollars of corporate financing, scheduled
to hit the market at the same time as a large Treasury offering,
might play havoc with Defense financing. The S.E.C. might prevent

this by refusing to accelerate the effective date of registration
statements until after the Treasury operation is out of the way.
It seems obvious, however, that unless this were made a generally
accepted procedure as a part of the Defense program, the effect

upon the market of the use of this device might be bad rather than
good. It is also questionable whether the S.E.C. could appropriately
employ this power for this purpose unless it had statutory or
executive sanction.

Privately offered issues

For the most part, life insurance companies are the principal

buyers of privately placed issues of securities. By far the great
percentage of their purchases in recent years has been refunding
bonds, which do not appear to create an immediate capital issues

control problem (except where the actual offering date conflicts
with Treasury plans) inasmuch as they represent merely the exchange

of one security for another already outstanding.

175

-3-

There is undoubtedly, however, a certain amount of stock and
bond financing of companies for new money purposes done through

commercial banks, fire insurance companies, institutional and private

investors. It seems probable that such financing might be for purposes in conflict with National Defense. At present, however, there
is no central source of information on this subject.
The subject of private placement of securities is one which
the S.E.C. intends (for reasons not directly related to Defense)
to cover in connection with its imminent proposals for amendments

to the Securities Act. It intends to ask Congress to require the

registration of most of such securities with it. This will give it
the same kind of opportunity to know about them and check with the

Defense offices that it now has as to the bulk of security issues
and should largely meet the problem, although a check should be made

with the Treasury as to whether the offering conflicts with Treasury
offerings.

Financing other than through sales of securities

The bulk of this financing falls in the general category of
commercial loans by commercial banks. These loans may run from 30

days to several years. They may reflect the acquisition of inventory,
the addition of new facilities, the cost of a new sales promotion
program or the refinancing of previously incurred debts. By and

large, there is no immediate interest in the last because it is in

176
-4-

the nature of a refunding, but there may well be cause for concern
in the others wherever they may be for the purchase of goods and

services in conflict with National Defense needs. Intelligent use
of our resources would seem to indicate the need at least for full
information about such transactions and perhaps for some form of
control.

The investment policies of life insurance companies may also
come into direct conflict with the Defense program in the mortgage

field. The construction of a new office building with insurance
funds, for example, may result in the employment of labor and
materials badly needed for Defense purposes. The same is true of

the construction of private homes, particularly in the type of large
scale real estate developments using the same types of labor as is
necessary to build Army posts and Defense housing projects.

For this reason, it seems important that some steps be taken

to make sure that this type of competition is not permitted to exist.
Of course, the Priorities Board can at any time step in and requisition
materials designated for an office building, and Mr. Hillman's office
can similarly requisition labor employed on such non-Defense projects.

Fut the psychological difficulties of doing this after the financing
has been arranged and the project is under way can readily be seen.

It might be helpful to catch such situations, where possible, in the
financing stage before specific priorities applications are made.
Furthermore, it might be well for the Treasury to know of these kinds

of financing to assist it in making its plans.

177

Conclusions and recommenda ons

There is no need for additional legislation to meet this
problem.

Sufficient machinery now exists within the Government to

handle this problem, provided that machinery is authorized to be
used for these purposes. There appears to be no need for the kind
of reliance upon local business groups such as were used in the

last war. In this connection, it should be recalled that there was
at that time no Federal statute for a central clearing house for all
public offerings of securities such as the S.E.C., and also that
the Federal Reserve System was relatively new - only a little over
three years old. Furthermore, there was no well established financial
institution with the Government to finance business such as the R.F.C.
The simple solution of our present problem seems to be to

coordinate the activities of existing agencies and to authorize
then, where authorization is or seems necessary, to employ their

existing machinery for the purpose or rendering every aid to the
military, naval and general defense needs of the nation.
Probably the first function of such a coordinated group would
be to open up reliable channels of information. The Government

should be in a position to know at all times where all capital is
going, whether it be through public or private offering of securities,
through private arrangements with banks and other commercial lenders,

through mortgages, or through any other channels including the
investment of corporate reserves. Such a coordinated group should
have unquestioned power to gather such information.

178

Secondly, such a group should be able to assist bona fide

defense projects to obtain the best kind of financing for their
particular needs, whether it be through governmental or private
channels.

Thirdly, such a group should have the latent power to control
the flow of capital wherever necessary for defense purposes. It
should be authorized to employ all powers existing in any of the
member agencies, regardless of the original purpose for which these
powers were granted, to this end. Typical would be the discount
powers of the Federal Reserve System and the stop order and
acceleration powers of the S.E.C.

Specifically, it is recommended that an Executive Order
be prepared providing that:

(1) A National Defense Finance Board be established,
comprised of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Chairman

of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Chairman of the

Reconstruction Finance Corporation and the Director of Priorities.

(2) This Board be created as an integral part of the
National Defense machinery, and as such directed to coordinate

its activities closely with those of the War and Navy Departments
and other National Defense agencies.

(3) Each member be authorized to employ to any extent

necessary the powers and facilities of his particular agency for
the purpose of carrying out the objectives of the Board.

179
-7-

(4) This Board be authorized to establish channels of
continuous information as to capital financing from all sources,
with authority to compel the submission of such information wherever
such compulsion becomes necessary.

(5) The Board be authorized to employ any powers existing
in the agencies of any of its members to prevent or postpone

capital financing in conflict with the needs of National Defense.
(6) The Board be directed to employ the facilities of
any or all of the agencies of its members to facilitate the financing
of bona fide National Defense businesses in need of financing or to

prevent financing in conflict as to time with Treasury plans.
To commend it, this plan has the feature that no new
governmental machinery and no new legislation are necessary.

It is simply a coordination of existing facilities.

180

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Establishing the National Defense Finance Board in the Executive

Office of the President and Defining Its Functions and Duties

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution
and the statutes, and in order to define further the functions
and duties of the Office for Emergency Management with respect to

the national emergency as declared by the President to exist on
September 8, 1939, for the purpose of effectively mobilizing,

utilizing, conserving and coordinating the Nation's financial resources
for production for national defense, for the purpose of preventing
wasteful financing, and finding that this Order is necessary to
increase the efficiency of the defense program, it is hereby ordered:
1. There shall be in the Office for Emergency Management
of the Executive Office of the President a National Defense
Finance Board which shall consist of (1) the Secretary of the
Treasury, (2) Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, (3) Chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation,
(4) Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (5)

Director of Priorities, Office of Production Management. The Chairman
of the Board shall be designated from among the members by the

President. The members shall serve as such without compensation but

shall be entitled to actual and necessary transportation, subsistence,
and other expenses incidental to the performance of their duties.

2. Subject to such policies, directions and regulations
as the President may from time to time prescribe, and with such

181
-2-

advice and assistance as the National Defense Finance Board may
require from the departments and agencies of the Federal Government,

and subject to the general policy of coordinating its activities
with those of the War and Navy Departments and other National Defense

agencies, and utilizing the services and facilities of other
departments and agencies of the Government to the fullest extent
compatible with efficiency, the National Defense Finance Board shall:

a. Assemble and analyze all pertinent information from private
or public sources for the purpose of utilizing and conserving the
Nation's financial resources for national defense, for the purpose
of coordinating the flow of capital and the Nation's requirements for
national defense, and for related purposes; and take all lawful action
necessary or appropriate to obtaining such information.

b. Insure and foster effective utilization, conservation and
coordination of the financial resources of the Nation for national
defense in connection with any capital financing; prevent any capital

financing in conflict with the national defense effort; and take all
lawful steps necessary and proper to these ends.

C. Determine the adequacy of existing facilities for financing
business enterprise connected with defense and stimulate their

maximum use; and foster the creation of such financial facilities as
may be appropriate to increase, aid and expedite production for
national defense.

d. Plan and take all lawful steps necessary to coordinate

capital financing in accordance with priorities of deliveries of

182

-3-

material as provided in Section 2(a) of the Act entitled "An Act
to Expedi te National Defense and For Other Purposes", approved

June 28, 1940, and in accordance with such determinations and orders
issued in pursuance thereof by the Office of Production Management.

e. Formulate plans for the mobilization for defense of the
financial resources and facilities of the Nation; and take all
lawful action necessary or appropriate to carry out such plans.

f. Utilize and coordinate for the purpose of carrying out
this Order the powers and facilities available in the several
departments, corporations and other agencies of the Government which

are concerned with financial activities.

g. Establish and maintain liaison with the financial, fiscal
and monetary agencies of the Government and with such other departments and agencies of the Government and with such persons, private
and public, as the National Defense Finance Board may deem necessary

to carry out this Order.

h. Advise upon proposed or existing legislation, and
recommend such additional legislation as may be necessary or

desirable, relating to financial activities or resources which
affect the mobilization of all resources required for national
defense.

183

i. Keep the President informed with regard to progress
made and problems encountered in carrying out this Order; and

perform such other related duties as the President may from time

to time assign or delegate to it.
j. Conduct such investigations, hold such hearings, make
such determinations, and prescribe such rules and regulations as

may be necessary or appropriate to carry out this Order.
3. The National Defense Finance Board may provide for

its internal organization and conduct its business in such manner
as it deems necessary to the performance of its functions and
duties.

4. Within the limits of such funds as may be allocated to
it by the President on the recommendation of the Bureau of the Budget,
the National Defense Finance Board and the Government departments,

corporations and agencies represented on the Board are authorized to
employ necessary personnel and make provision for the necessary

supplies, facilities, and services to carry out the provisions of
this Order. However, the National Defense Finance Board shall use

insofar as practicable such statistical, informational, fiscal,
personnel, and other general business services and facilities as may
be made available through the Office for Emergency Management or
other departments and agencies of the Government.
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT
THE WHITE HOUSE
March

, 1941

184

March 12, 1941

KENDRANDIAN FOR THE PRESIDENT

Re: Control of Capital Funds

This nemo results from a talk I had recently with Jia Forrestal on
the subject. He agrees that steps should be taken now to prevent the flow
of capital into projects which may be in competition with the Defense
effort. You may recall that several months ago Judge Patterson indicated

to you a similar interest in action to this end. Right now, we do not even
have reliable channels of information through which we can know currently

where capital is going from such sources as banks, life and fire insurance
companies, other institutional investors, etc.

As a result of this discussion, I have studied the subject and am
convinced that all necessary steps can be taken without additional

legislation. All that is needed is a proper coordination of the various
existing agencies of Government having functions related to the flow of

capital and finance, both public and private. And of course those agencies
should be authorised and instructed to use whatever facilities they have
wherever necessary.

The S.E.C. offers a good example. After a recent talk with Stettinius
and Lubin, we adopted the policy of making priorities information "material"
in connection with Securities Act registrations. Now, whenever an issuer
is registering to get money for new plant or equipment, we check with O.P.M.

and Priorities to see if the project is in competition with National Defense

as to materials or labor. If so, we require that this be prominently

185
2.

disclosed in the prospectus. of course, our emphasis here is on protection

of investors and our reliance is on publicity, because that's all our statute
lets us do normally. But it should be almost 100 per cent effective.
Similarly, we have the power to delay the offering of registered stocks
and bonds because of inadequate disclosure, etc. But, without emergency

authority from you, there is considerable doubt whether we could use this
power to delay private financing which might compete with Treasury financing

for Defense needs. It is, of course, net inconceivable that a couple of
hundred millions of private financing might wreck the Treasury's plans if 18
all came on the same day.

These are just examples. Other powers exist in this Commission and in
other agencies. Could you not coordinate the work of all these agencies by
setting up a Defense Finance Board composed of the Secretary of the Treasury,
the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the Chairman of the R.F.C., the

Chairman of the S.E.C. and the Director of Priorities, authorising the employsent of any facilities and powers which all these agencies have for this
purpose? Jim Forrestal feels this would be most helpful.

If this is not done, yesterday's plea of Connely of the Investment
Bankers Association to have a Capital Issues Committee as in the last war,

may be reechood to the point where any effort to confine this activity to
existing Government agencies may be difficult. We don't need and I doubt if
we want a 1917 Capital Issues Committee again.

Jerome N. Frank
Chairman

186

Union Calendar No. 82
77TH CONGRESS
1st SESSION

H.R. 4050
[Report No. 276]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 18, 1941

bine

Mr. TAYLOR, from the Committee on Appropriations, reported the following
bill; which was committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
state of the Union and ordered to be printed

Firm

A BILL

(8)

at

at

Making supplemental appropriations for the national defense to
provide aid to the government of any country whose defense
the President deems vital to the defense of the United States,
and for other purposes.
1

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That to enable the President, through such departments or
4 agencies of the Government as he may designate, to carry

5 out the provisions of An Act to Promote the Defense of
6 the United States, approved March 11, 1941, and for each

2

1 and every purpose incident to or necessary therefor, there

2 is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury
3 not otherwise appropriated, the following sums for the fol4 lowing respective purposes, namely:
5

6

(a) For the procurement, by manufacture or otherwise,
of defense articles for the government of any country whose
ml

7 defense the President deems vital to the defense of the
cars

8 United States, including services and expenses in connection
9 therewith, as follows:
10

(1) Ordnance and ordnance stores, supplies, spare

11 parts, and materials, including armor and ammunition and
moit

BOSTAT

12 components thereof, $1,343,000,000.
13

all

llid

botariq of to data

(2) Aircraft and aeronautical material, including en-

14 gines, spare parts, and accessories, $2,054,000,000.
15

(3) Tanks, armored cars, automobiles, trucks, and other

16 automotive vehicles, spare parts, and accessories, $362.17 000,000.
18

anidall

hemmey ods of his obivorq
(4) Vessels, ships, boats, and other watercraft, and

19 equipage, supplies, materials, spare parts, and accessories,

20 $629,000,000. Id hotopies If sa
21

(5) Miscellaneous military equipment, supplies, and

22 materials, $260,000,000. od oldans a) IndT 8
23

(6) Facilities and equipment, for the manufacture or

24 production of defense articles, by construction or acquisition,

das his teel donald bizonqqa and botia U edit a

3

1 including the acquisition of land, and the maintenance
2 and operation of such facilities and equipment, $752,000,000.

(7) Agricultural, industrial, and other commodities and

3

4 articles, $1,350,000,000.

5 For testing, inspecting, proving, repairing, outfit6 ting, reconditioning, or otherwise placing in good working
7 order any defense articles for the government of any country

8 whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of
9 the United States, including services and expenses in con10 nection therewith, $200,000,000.

(c) Not to exceed 20 per centum of any of the fore-

11

12 going eight appropriations may be transferred by the Pres13 ident to any other such appropriation, but no appropriation
10

M

14 shall be increased by more than 30 per centum. adt
(d) For necessary services and expenses for carrying

15

16 out the purposes of such Act not specified or included in the

17 foregoing, $40,000,000. od India tab
81

unins(e) For administrative expenses, $10,000,000.

18

19

to

(f) In all, $7,000,000,000, to remain available until

20 June 30, 1943.
21

sool

OF

SEC. 2. If any defense article procured from an appro-

22 priation made before March 11, 1941, is disposed of, under
23 such Act of March 11, 1941, by any department or agency
24 to the government of any country whose defense the Presi-

VIA ABUT 10 assel estal8 as

4:

1 dent deemed vital to the defense of the United States, the
2 President may transfer, from the appropriations made by

3 this Act to the appropriate appropriation of such depart
4 ment or agency, an amount equivalent to the value (as
5 computed for the purposes of the $1,300,000,000 limitation

6 contained in section 3 (a) (2) of such Act of March 11,
7 1941) of the defense article so disposed of, but not to exceed

8 in the aggregate $1,300,000,000.
9

8

SEC. 3. Any defense article procured from an appropria-

10 tion made by this Act shall be retained by or transferred to
11 and for the use of such department or agency. of the United
12 States as the President may determine, in lieu of being dis13 posed of to a foreign government, whenever in the judgment

14 of the President the defense of the United States will be
15 best served thereby.
16

(b)

at

SEC. 4. No part of any appropriation contained in this

17 Act shall be used to pay the salary or wages of any person

18 who advocates, or who is a member of an organization
19 that advocates, the overthrow of the Government of the
20 United States by force or violence: Provided, That for the
21 purposes hereof an affidavit shall be considered prima facie

22 evidence that the person making the affidavit does not
23 advocate, and is not a member of an organization that
24 advocates, the overthrow of the Government of the United

25 States by force or violence: Provided further, That any

5

1 person who advocates, or who is a member of an organization

2 that advocates, the overthrow of the Government of the
3 United States by force or violence and accepts employment

4 the salary or wages for which are paid from any appropria5 tion in this Act shall be guilty of a felony and, upon convie-

6 tion, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned

7 for not more than one year, or both: Provided further,
8 That the above penalty clause shall be in addition to, and
9 not in substitution for, any other provisions of existing law.
10

SEC. 5. This Act may be cited as the "Defense Aid

11 Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1941."

187

77TH CONGRESS

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

REPORT

No. 276

1st Session

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATION BILL,
1941

MARCH 18, 1941.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the state

of the Union and ordered to be printed

Mr. TAYLOR, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the
following

REPORT
[To accompany H. R. 4050]

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in
explanation of the accompanying bill entitled "A bill making supplemental appropriations for the national defense to provide aid to the
Government of any country whose defense the President deems vital
to the defense of the United States, and for other purposes," with a
recommendation for immediate consideration and early enactment
The purpose of the bill is to provide the necessary appropriations
to carry into effect an act to promote the defense of the United States,
approved March 11, 1941.

The Budget estimates upon which this bill is based were transmitted
to Congress on March 12 by the President in a letter addressed to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives (H. Doc. No. 139) requesting
a total of direct appropriations of $7,000,000,000.
The letter of the President to the Speaker is as follows:
THE WRITE HOUSE,

Washington, March 18,1941.
Hon. SAM RAYBURN,

Speaker, House of Representatives,

Washington, D.C.

My DEAR MR. SPEAKER: This Nation has felt that it was imperative to the
security of America, that we encourage the democracies' heroic resistance to
aggressions, by not only maintaining but also increasing the flow of material

2

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941
assistance
from this country. Therefore, the Congress has enacted and I have
signed H. R. 1776.

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941
)

(

Through this legislation our country has determined to do its full
creating an adequate arsenal of democracy. This great arsenal will be part in
this country. It will be a bulwark of our own defense. It will be the here is

3

The committee invites attention to the remarks of the Secretary of
at the opening of the hearing on these appropriations. They
State clear and cogent restatement of the policy and purpose of our
Government are a in approving an act to promote the defense of the United

and of the urgency of providing the appropriations called for
States the bill. The following excerpt epitomizes the statement:

the toolsaggression.
of defense for all democracies who are fighting to preserve themselves source of
against

While the defense equipment produced under H. R. 1776 remains under
control of the United States until it is ready for disposition, it is the fixed the

by

Secretary HULL.

Our safety and the success of the course upon

we have set ourselves demand the courage and the wisdom to go full out in

of this
Government
to can
make for democracies every gun, plane, and munition policy of
war
that
we possibly

which adequate material aid to the nations whose defense is necessary to our

To accomplish these objectives I am transmitting an estimate in the

furnishing When we do this, we take the most effective step possible in the circum-

defense. to keep war away from our hemisphere, from our own Nation. Doing

of $7,000,000,000, the details of which are set forth in the accompanying amount letter

stances
we act in defense of our homes, our institutions, our liberties, our way of life.
this,

from
the Director
of the Bureau of the Budget. I strongly urge the immediate
enactment
of this appropriation.

In this task, half measures will not suffice. There is much to be done and the

is urgent. We must strive with all our will, all our power, and all our
task To be content with less would be to invite disaster. No people in

Respectfully,
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT.

history resources. have had such opportunity to learn from the tragic example of others.

This Budget estimate was received on March 12. The committee
held hearings on March 13, 14, and 15, having before it the Secretary
of State, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, the Chief of
Staff of the Army, the Assistant Chief of Naval Operations, the Director General of the Office of Production Management (Mr. Knudsen),
the Director of the Bureau of the Budget, and other officials concerned
with the planning of the program
The estimates upon which the bill is based were carefully prepared
after a survey of the requirements to carry out the act of March 11.

We cannot stint and we must not falter.

It has been deemed advisable by the committee and in consonance
with the advice of the administrative officials concerned that all of the
usual minute justification of appropriations should not be discussed

in the printed hearing. The total appropriation of $7,000,000,000
and the several categories of the 10 appropriations constituting that
amount have been "broken down" for the committee into component
elements and the committee is possessed of the itemization used by

the Government agencies concerned in making up the individual

The work of the survey was facilitated by the furnishing by the

amounts of the categories of appropriation which comprise the total.
The omission of this detail from the printed hearing is not occasioned

British Government of a specific list of its needs. That list has been

studied by the War and Navy Departments and other agencies

by any desire to withhold information from the Congress and the
public to which they are entitled. Rather it is a desire to withhold
from certain foreign governments and their diligent agents detailed
information which they should not have. The procurements under
the funds in this bill are for weapons and instruments of war to aid

concerned and by the Office of Production Management and in consultation with the representatives of that Government. The program under the $7,000,000,000 has been coordinated and correlated
with our own needs for our own defense. It represents in terms of
money and quantities of defense articles the needs for assistance as
they can be seen at this time. The sum is stupendous and the program ,
is gigantic but the issue is greater than both.

(

The committee has incorporated in the bill the full amount of

the Budget estimate of $7,000,000,000 distributed according to the
10 categories of appropriation. The policy of aid to countries whose
defense may be determined to be vital to the defense of the United
States has been established with the approval of an act to promote
the defense of the United States on March 11 (H. R. 1776, Public

countries which are engaged in a desperate struggle and whose success

in that combat is vital to us. These details have a strategic value
which must be carefully preserved. The committee ventures to
express the hope that what might only be considered by some to be
"interesting news" to the citizens of this country shall not become
"strategic news" elsewhere to the harm of the very countries we are
trying to assist and to ourselves.
There has been speculation on the part of some that the production
of such vast amounts of defense articles for assistance to other countries

Law No. 11). The remaining step to start the full impact of that

might injure our own defense. The committee desires to quote from

policy is to implement with funds the agencies which the President
may designate to carry out the purposes of the law. In urging expedition in the granting of the appropriations the committee has in
mind the legislative history of H. R. 1776. That bill was introduced
in the House of Representatives on January 10, reported to the
House on January 30, passed the House on February 8, reported to the
Senate on February 13, passed the Senate on March 8. The House
concurred in the Senate amendments on March 11 and the President
signed the bill immediately. The program now needs to proceed
with the utmost expedition consistent with prudence if it is to have
the effect which the law contemplates and which the American people
unquestionably overwhelmingly approve.

the very pertinent testimony of the Chief of Staff of the Army in

response to a question from Representative Ludlow:
Mr. LUDLOW. General, I want to ask whether, in your opinion, providing these
articles in aid to Britain will in any way endanger our own defense?

General MARSHALL No. sir: on the contrary I think that as we now have

matters arranged, the result will be to our advantage Our own actual resources
will not be diminished until the finished products come off the production until line

and are ready for shipment. Increased production will add to our strength a
the time for distribution begins. I will go further and say this; that I would be
much happier man today if I thought we had reached a point in our production would

development where we actually had more capacity than we required. That
be the most favorable situation possible for us, in view of present conditions.

The committee has also been advised with respect to the utilization
by the United States of the defense articles to be procured with these

)

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941
4

5

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

given as security on defense articles which the United States may

whose
defense
isthetonotStates.
funds in the event
vital they are
United disposed of for aid to any country

furnish to them.

Secretary Stimson made this statement, which shows very
mendable
planning
the War Department and very commendable com.
cooperation
by thebyBritish:

United Kingdom and the Dominions are currently amounting monthly
$1,750,000,000, of which $1,500,000,000 is by the United Kingdom
to and $250,000,000 by the Dominions. Canada will spend $1,400,000,000 in the fiscal year 1941-42 on her direct war effort, which is 25
percent of her expected national income.
The agreements with the governments to be assisted under "An
act to promote the defense of the United States' rest with the President of the United States. His is the responsibility to determine the
terms and conditions under which the nations receiving this aid should

Of the War Department items, practically all or 95 percent
which can be used for our own Army purposes and which would be are those
in case Britain should fall. Only 5 percent represent purely British vitally useful
weapons, including the facilities to be erected for such weapons, as types of
from our American types and their facilities. And even in the case distinguished of this

5 percent, the plant facilities necessary for construction- that is the tools last
plants for these purely British items could be used by us on very short and the

In other words, as you are doubtless familiar, I might give as an notice

the British use the 303-caliber rifle. The facilities for the construction example of that

rifle which they are using in this country today, under their contracts that
creation, could be transferred so as to manufacture the 30-caliber rifle which for its

use, I am informed, in about 2 months, And, in the same way, the facilities We
the ammunition
items.

could be transformed And that is true largely of other British for

The committee has received from the Director General of the
Office of Production Management a resume from last June to date of
the progress of our own defense efforts. Contracts placed for matériel total $12,600,000,000. Contracts for construction on 302 Govern.
ment plants total $1,574,000,000. A total of 421 privately financed

prime contractors' plants have been certified for assistance in the
amount of $393,000,000. The total for facilities, governmental, or
privately owned assisted with Federal funds, is $2,138,000,000 on &
total of 723 plants. In addition the British Government has financed
61 plants for a total of $171,000,000. Mr. Knudsen advised the com-

mittee that if funds are provided for the facilities contemplated by
the bill they can be procured in a reasonable time and will meet the
needs for procurement of the matériel. Some existing facilities will be
available in addition to those which the British Government has
provided
and which will become available rapidly as they run out of
British orders.
The committee has also made inquiry as to British resources and
orders placed in this country. The total of such orders placed by the
British Purchasing Mission to January 1, 1941, is $2,700,000,000.
Payments on these orders to March 12 totaled $1,682,000,000
consisting of $1,300,000,000 paid prior to January 1, 1941, and
$382,000,000 paid during the period January 1 to March 12, 1941.
All goods delivered under these orders have been paid for in cash and
some goods not delivered have been partially paid for in advance.
The committee has been assured that none of the $7,000,000,000
contained in the bill will be used to pay for materials under any orders
heretofore placed by the British Government and that sufficient
existing dollar resources and dollars to be acquired by them will be
available to pay for those orders. The estimated British holdings in
the United States as of January 1 last consisted of $616,000,000 of
marketable securities, $900,000,000 in direct investments, $292,000,000

in gold, $54,000,000 in official dollar balances, and $305,000,000 in
private dollar balances. These figures necessarily have changed as
these resources have been drawn upon between January 1 and March
12 by $382,000,000 to meet payments for the goods ordered. The

committee is also advised that the British assets in this country
insofar as they are not needed for payment on their orders here will

Britain is engaged in a terrific struggle. The expenditures of the

make a return to the United States. A nation engaged in a death
struggle with a mortal enemy needs, in addition to the tools of war,
the maintenance of its own economy and financial stability in order
to pursue successfully its efforts. If the United States furnishes
Great Britain with defense articles but upsets her economy the aims
and purposes of our assistance would be defeated.

The committee desires to call attention to the form in which the

appropriations are made in this bill. It is not a "blank check

appropriation. Public Law No. 11 provides that the President may

authorize the head of any department or agency to procure the defense
articles which that act specifies for aid to any country whose defense is

vital to the United States. It is not practicable, considering the problems involved in this huge program, to appropriate specifically in terms
of the normal Government appropriations in the usual detail to each
of the agencies and each of the bureaus and other offices concerned

and "freeze" the procuring funds in customarily rigid channels. It
should be borne in mind that the appropriations in this bill are for
aid to countries that are at war. That war is being fought on the
high seas of the world, in Europe and in Africa, and with hostilities
and moves of conquest in Asia. The important theaters of the war

are shifting rapidly from one area to another. Changes are occurring
constantly in the types of weapons and their use. A program of aid
such as this must be as flexible as a program of use in combat The
needs may change frequently and the emphasis on certain needs may
shift to others. The committee therefore feels that it is highly desirable that flexibility should be provided and to that end has approved
the proposal for a 20-percent transfer between appropriations with the
stipulation that not more than 30 percent can be added to any one of
the first 8 of the 10 specified appropriations by virtue of the transfer.
This flexibility is particularly desirable not only with respect to the
amounts for defense articles under specific categories but also with
respect to the application of the amounts to any particular countries
as exigencies may occur from time to time.
The bill contains 10 separate appropriations, 7 of which are devoted
to categories of procurement of specific classes of defense articles and
3 of which are devoted to services. Each of these 10 appropriations
is subject to allocation by the President to such department or agency,
as he may deem advisable, to procure the type of defense articles
needed. The total of the 7 procurement appropriations is $6,750.000,000 and the total of those devoted to services is $250,000,000.
A few of these categories are necessarily problematic, particularly
the item of $200,000,000 for repairing and reconditioning defense

6

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

articles.
This
must
be so,andue
to inability to secure any substantial
data
upon
which
to base
estimate.
The 10
categories
appropriation into which the $7,000,000,000
divided
consist
of theof
following:
1. Ordnance and ordnance stores, supplies, spare parts, and
terials, including armor and ammunition and components thereof, ma$1,343,000,000.

2. Aircraft
and aeronautical
material, including engines, spare
parts,
and accessories,
$2,054,000,000.

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

7

expressed by the act. If all the money for all the program is available
time, all the commitments for all the program can progress as
at one as the executive officers can make the plans and enter into
the rapidly contract. If the funds are appropriated in installments the
program of procurement is apt to become an installment program in

of time. The committee was advised that substantially the

point entire amount of the funds provided would be required prior to July
1942

3. Tanks, armored cars, automobiles, trucks, and other automotive

The committee has likewise canvassed the practicability of providing
of the $7,000,000,000 in direct appropriation and part in contract
part
authorization. So far as the obligation of the Government to pay is

4. Vessels, ships, boats, and other watercraft, and equipage, sup-

concerned a definite commitment through a contract made by an
administrative officer against legislative authority to enter into

vehicles, spare parts, and accessories, $362,000,000.

plies, materials, spare parts, and accessories, $629,000,000.

5. Miscellaneous
$260,000,000.

military equipment, supplies, and materials,

6. Facilities and equipment, for the manufacture or production of
defense articles by construction or acquisition, including the acquisition of land, and the maintenance and operation of such facilities and
equipment, $752,000,000.

7. Agricultural,
$1,350,000,000.

industrial, and other commodities and articles,

8. Testing, inspecting, proving, repairing, outfitting, recondition-

ing, etc., defense articles, $200,000,000.

9. Services and expenses not specified or included in any of the

foregoing, $40,000,000.

10. Administrative expenses, $10,000,000.
Each of these 10 appropriations will be accounted for as though it

had been made in the normal fashion. The expenditures will be

audited by the General Accounting Office. Treasury statements will
show the expenditures under the appropriations in this bill in the same
manner as other appropriation expenditures are exhibited.
The sum of $7,000,000,000 is a large total for any single appropriation bill. The question naturally arises as to why all the fund should
be granted at one time-why not appropriate some now, some more

contracts is as binding upon the United States as though the contract
were made under a direct appropriation sufficient for its fulfillment.
The Congress would have to appropriate to discharge the contract
authority granted when the need for cash arose or repudiate obligations lawfully entered into. In effect contract authorizations granted
by Congress to permit administrative officials to initiate procurement
programs are deferred appropriations and the only point in giving a
contract authorization is to defer the appropriation to the end that the
appropriations and the cash withdrawals from the Treasury may more
nearly harmonize on a fiscal-year basis. In the present instance if
part of this money is given in cash and part in contract authorization
it will advertise to those seeking information with respect to the
military characteristics of the program what part of it is long range
and what part is relatively short range. So far as a division between
cash and contract is concerned there is no particular advantage to the
United States in providing the funds in that fashion, but there would
be circumlocution in our bookkeeping. There is a particular disadvantage to those we are seeking to aid.

later, and some still later-tak it piecemeal instead of all in one

The committee is advised that under the terms of the bill the procedure to be followed will be the allocation from the particular appropriations involved to a Federal agency for procuring certain defense
articles or furnishing certain services authorized by the act of March

lump-because the amount is made available until June 30, 1943. The
amount is based upon the procurement of definite quantities of defense
articles. They have to be acquired for this specific purpose; they are

procure the defense articles or perform the services in accordance with
the laws which are applicable at that time to that agency in connection

in the main, not articles of commercial use. In some instances
facilities must be constructed with which to produce them. It

should be recalled that these funds are all to be expended by the
United States Government and the defense articles to be procured
will belong to the United States until the President decides pursuant
to the law what shall be done with them. No officer of the United
States can enter into commitments on behalf of the United States
without first having an appropriation from which the entire commitment can be paid or without having other specific authority to make &

commitment on behalf of the United States. If only a part of the
funds are appropriated now only that part of the commitments for
defense articles can be made that can be paid for with that amount of
money. The initiation of the commitments for the rest of the defense

articles must wait until more money is available. Such a delay
would be inexcusable and nonresponsive to the purposes and policy

11. The agency receiving such an allotment will then proceed to
with making its own similar procurements or performing its own
similar services. No new procedures or departures from existing
practices and requirements are contemplated.

The total appropriation in this bill is $7,000,000,000. Public Law

No. 11, section 3 (a) (2), provides that the value of the defense articles

procured from appropriations made before the enactment of that
act and disposed of under the authority of that paragraph shall not
exceed $1,300,000,000. This sum plus the $7,000,000,000 carried in
this bill makes a total ceiling of aid of $8,300,000,000. The committee has included in the bill, however, in modified and clarified
form the Budget recommendation (sec. 2) that the President may
order the transfer from any of the appropriations in the bill to the
appropriate appropriation of the department or agency, which procured such a defense article and by which it was disposed of an
amount equivalent to the value of the defense article so disposed of,

8

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

but the total of such transfers shall not exceed the total of
000. This transfer provision, to the extent it is availed $1,300,000. of
operate to reduce the ceiling of $8,300,000,000. For example, if will
entire $1,300,000,000 in value of defense articles should be the
of under the law and the President should determine that disposed
should be transferred to the furnishing agencies for replacement $500,000,000

poses, the ceiling of aid becomes a total of $7,800,000,000 instead pur-

$8,300,000,000 and the amount available under this bill for of

becomes $6,500,000,000 instead of $7,000,000,000. The Budget new aid

ommendation provided for transfer from the appropriations to rec-

the value of defense articles disposed of subject to the $1,300,000,000 cover

limit and the value of defense articles that might be disposed of
the future under such appropriations as might be made available in
hereafter for that purpose. The committee has confined the transfer
proposal
to the
$1,300,000,000
and prefers to cross the bridge of the
future
when
it comes
to it.
This transfer provision will also have the effect of protecting
own defenses in that it will make it possible to provide for replace- our
ment of defense articles that are disposed of under the $1,300,000,000
that are deemed necessary to be replaced in the interest of our
defenses. It will also be in the interest of maintaining an orderly own

record of the cost of the entire aid program Without some such
arrangement, it might become necessary for replacement of any such

defense articles to await future appropriations with consequent
delay and with confusion in the cost records of the entire aid program.
The committee has suggested during the course of the hearings
that the Bureau of the Budget maintain appropriate central records

in connection with the finances of this program and has received
assurances that the suggestion will be followed Such central record.

ing should include the allocation of funds for procurement and
reimbursement, the periodic statement of obligation of funds, and
other appropriate fiscal data in connection therewith, so that this
information may be currently available for the information of Congress. The committee has also received assurances that appropriate
centralized informational records will be kept of procurements and
other progress so that there will be available the principal progress
data for such access as the appropriate jurisdictional committees of
Congress may wish.

The committee deems it advisable to incorporate section 3, which
provides that any defense article procured from funds in the bill shall
be retained by or transferred to and for the use of such department or
agency of the United States as the President may determine, in lieu
of being disposed of to a foreign government, whenever in his judgment
the defense of the United States will be best served thereby. Obviously

if our own need at any point in the program should precipitously

become more important than the furnishing of aid to a country whose
defense the President had deemed vital to the defense of the United
States, the right should exist to retain and use for our own immediate
necessities such defense articles as the President should consider would
best serve our own interests.
The committee has included as section 4 a provision prohibiting the
use of any of the money contained in the bill for paying the salary or
wages of any person who advocates, or is a member of an organization
that advocates, the overthrow of the Government of the United States
by force or violence. This section is identical with similar provisions

1

9

adopted by the House at this session in connection with other appropristion bills.

For the convenience of the House membership there is reprinted
appendix to this report the text of "An act to promote the defense
of the United States, approved March 11, 1941" (H. R. 1776, Public
Law No. 11, 77th Cong.).

The committee is aware of the very grave responsibility it has in
recommending this huge appropriation. It has considered it from all
angles and concludes that if effective implementation is to be given to
the recent law providing for this aid there is no other course but to
provide the full amount. Either the United States means what it said
in "An act to promote the defense of the United States" and goes in
whole-heartedly, enthusiastically, and expeditiously to become the
arsenal and storehouse of defense articles for aid to the beleaguered
democracies whom we have avowed to assist in order to promote our
own defenses, or we become a faltering "welsher" on the promises we
have held out to those brave countries and their people who are looking

in this direction for the ray of sunshine that will illumine the dark
pathway they are treading. We either give an all-out assistance or
we fall down on the job. No halfway measures can be countenanced

at this critical stage.

The committee also desires to call the attention of the executive
agencies of the Government to the serious responsibility that rests
upon them under any allocations the President may make for them
to administer. Procurements should be made with the utmost care
to protect the interests of the United States, contracts should be
carefully drawn with appropriate cancelation provisions to protect
the Government, and every official should regard this task as important

as if his own individual life depended upon its faithful and prudent
administration. The patriotic endeavors of industry, labor, and all
other citizens are needed. A unified, harmonious effort by all the
people of the United States behind this program will carry it forward

successfully and promptly. The news of that program and this
effort will be an inspiration to every citizen of every nation we are
seeking to aid. That tonic and the defense articles we furnish them
should be their salvation and ours.

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

APPENDIX
[PUBLIC LAW 11-77TH CONGRESS]
[CHAPTER 11-1st SESSION]
(H. R. 1776)

AN ACT
Further to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purpose.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act of

may be
States"

cited as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United

SEC. 2. As used in this Act(a) The term "defense article" means(1) Any weapon, munition, aircraft, vessel, or boat:
(2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply necessary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servicing, or operation of any article described in this subsection;
(3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any
article described in this subsection;
Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article
for (4)
defense.

Such term "defense article" includes any article described in this
subsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to
which the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter
acquires title, possession, or control.
(b) The term "defense information" means any plan, specification,

design, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article.
SEC. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the
President may, from time to time, when he deems it in the interest
of national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary
of
the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the
Government-

(1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards
under their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to

which funds are made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense

article for the government of any country whose defense the
President deems vital to the defense of the United States.

(2) To sell, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise
dispose of, to any such government any defense article, but no
defense article not manufactured or procured under paragraph
(1) shall in any way be disposed of under this paragraph, except

after consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Army or the
Chief of Naval Operations of the Navy, or both. The value of
defense articles disposed of in any way under authority of this
paragraph, and procured from funds heretofore appropriated,

shall not exceed $1,300,000,000. The value of such defense articles
10

0

11

shall be determined by the head of the department or agency concerned or such other department, agency or officer as shall be
designated in the manner provided in the rules and regulations
issued hereunder. Defense articles procured from funds hereafter
appropriated to any department or agency of the Government,
other than from funds authorized to be appropriated under this
Act, shall not be disposed of in any way under authority of this
paragraph except to the extent hereafter authorized by the Congress in the Acts appropriating such funds or otherwise.
(3) To test, inspect, prove, repair, outfit, recondition, or otherwise to place in good working order, to the extent to which funds
are made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time
to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for any such

government, or to procure any or all such services by private
contract.

(4) To communicate to any such government any defense information, pertaining to any defense article furnished to such government under paragraph (2) of this subsection.

(5) To release for export any defense article disposed of in
any way under this subsection to any such government.
(b) The terms and conditions upon which any such foreign government receives any aid authorized under subsection (a) shall be those
which the President deems satisfactory, and the benefit to the United
States may be payment or repayment in kind or property, or any other
direct or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory.

(c) After June 30, 1943, or after the passage of a concurrent
resolution by the two Houses before June 30, 1943, which declares
that the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) are no
longer necessary to promote the defense of the United States, neither
the President nor the head of any department or agency shall exereise any of the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a)
except that until July 1, 1946, any of such powers may be exercised
to the extent necessary to carry out a contract or agreement with such
a foreign government made before July 1, 1943, or before the passage
of such concurrent resolution, whichever is the earlier.

(d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to

permit the authorization of convoying vessels by naval vessels of the
United States.

(e) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit
the authorization of the entry of any American vessel into a combat
area in violation of section 3 of the Neutrality Act of 1939.
SEC. 4. All contracts or agreements made for the disposition of
any defense article or defense information pursuant to section 3 shall
contain a clause by which the foreign government undertakes that

it will not, without the consent of the President, transfer title to

or possession of such defense article or defense information by gift,
sale, or otherwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee,
or agent of such foreign government.

SEC. 5. (a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or
the head of any other department or agency of the Government
involved shall, when any such defense article or defense information
is exported, immediately inform the department or agency designated

12

DEFENSE AID SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION, 1941

by the President to administer section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940
(54 Stat. 714), of the quantities, character, value, terms of disposition, and destination of the article and information so exported
(b) The President from time to time, but not less frequently than
once every ninety days, shall transmit to the Congress a report of
operations under this Act except such information as he deems
incompatible with the public interest to disclose. Reports provided
for under this subsection shall be transmitted to the Secretary of

the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as the case
may be,
be, isif not
the in
Senate
or the House of Representatives, as the case
may
session.

SEC. 6. (a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from
time to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise
appropriated, such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the
provisions and accomplish the purposes of this Act,
(b) All money and all property which is converted into money
received under section 8 from any government shall, with the approval
of the Director of the Budget, revert to the respective appropriation
or appropriations out of which funds were expended with respect to
the defense article or defense information for which such consideration
is received, and shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for
which such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the
fiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal
year; but in no event shall any funds so received be available for
expenditure after June 30, 1946.
SEC. 7. The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the
head of the department or agency shall in all contracts or agreements
for the disposition of any defense article or defense information fully
protect the rights of all citizens of the United States who have patent

rights in and to any such article or information which is hereby

authorized to be disposed of and the payments collected for royalties
on such patents shall be paid to the owners and holders of such patents.

SEC. 8. The Secretaries of War and of the Navy are hereby

authorized to purchase or otherwise acquire arms, ammunition, and
implements of war produced within the jurisdiction of any country
to which section 3 is applicable, whenever the President deems such
purchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defense
of the United States.
SEC. 9. The President may, from time to time, promulgate such
rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to carry out any

of the provisions of this Act; and he may exercise any power or
authority conferred on him by this Act through such department,

agency, or officer as he shall direct.
SEC. 10. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to change existing

law relating to the use of the land and naval forces of the United

States, except insofar as such use relates to the manufacture, procure-

ment, and repair of defense articles, the communication of information and other noncombatant purposes enumerated in this Act.
Snc. 11. If any provision of this Act or the application of such
provision to any circumstance shall be held invalid, the validity of
other the remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provision to
circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Approved, March 11, 1941.

188

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL

COPY

March 18, 1941

My dear Mr. Secretary:

Pursuant to the Act of March 11, 1941, I hereby
authorize you during my absence and until further notice
from me to:

(a) To transfer, after consultation with the

Chief of Staff, to His Majesty's Government in the United
Kingdom, China and the Royal Greek Government defense

articles procured out of appropriations made before March
11, 1941 of a dollar value not in excess of $5,000,000,
when you deem such transfers in the interests of our defense.

(b) To place orders under that Act, for items

approved by you, in an amount not in excess of $150,000,000,

in a manner similar to your traditional method of issuing
conditional letters of intention, and binding on the Govern-

ment when and if the appropriations are passed.
Very sincerely yours,

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (Sgd.)

The Honorable

The Secretary of War.

189

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL
COPY

March 18, 1941.

My dear Mr. Secretary:

Pursuant to the Act of March 11, 1941, I hereby
authorize you during my absence and until further notice
from me to:

(a) To transfer, after consultation with the

Chief of Naval Operations, to His Majesty's Government in
the United Kingdom, China and the Royal Greek Government

defense articles procured out of appropriations made before
March 11, 1941 of a dollar value not in excess of $1,000,000
when you deem such transfers in the interests of our defense.

(b) To place orders under that Act, for items
approved by you, in the amount not in excess of $15,000,000

in a manner similar to your traditional method of issuing
conditional letters of intention, and binding on the Govern-

ment when and if the appropriations are passed.
Very sincerely yours,

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (Sgd.)

The Honorable

The Secretary of the Navy.

190

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL

COPY

March 18, 1941.

My dear Admiral Land:

Pursuant to the Act of March 11, 1941, I hereby
authorize you during my absence and until further notice
from me to place orders under Section 3(a)(1) or 3(a)(3)
in an amount not in excess of $1,000,000 in a manner

similar to traditional Government method of issuing

conditional letters of intention, and binding on the
Government when and if the appropriations are passed.

Very sincerely yours,
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (Sgd.)

Honorable Emory S. Land,
Maritime Commission,
Washington, D. C.

191
COPY

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL

March 19, 1941.

My dear Mr. Secretary:

This will cancel my authority to you relative to the
transfer of 45 planes to the Royal Greek Government.

Consultation having been had with the Chief of Naval
Operations of the Navy, I find that:

(1) The defense of the United Kingdom is vital to

the defense of the United States;

(2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941

have been complied with by the necessary agreement on the part
of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom;

(3) It would be in the interests of our national
defense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the
annexed schedule.

I therefore authorize you immediately to make the
transfer to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of
the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule.

I would appreciate it if you would arrange with the

Chairman of the British Supply Council in North America for
the time, method, and other details of the disposition.
Very sincerely yours,
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Sgd.)

The Honorable

The Secretary of the Navy.

192

DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER
BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO THE UNITED KINGDOM

30 Grummond Planes

March 19, 1941

193
Cox gave to Harry Hopkins on
3/18/41.

for
From:

Mr. Hopkins
Mr. Cox

Subject: Napier-Saber Engine.

The British are under the impression that Mr. Knudsen
thinks no order can be placed for this engine under the
Lease-Lend Act until it is adopted by the Army or Navy.

Since these engines are critical items for the British,
unnecessary delay may be caused by waiting for their adoption
by the Army or Navy.

As you know, this engine is now being tested by the Army.

It would seem that the testing should be speeded up so
that a decision can be reached by the time the Lease-Lend ap-

propriation is enacted either to have the engine manufactured

for both the United States and Britain, OF for Britain alone.

OSC:aja

3/18/41

194

March 18, 1941
Ferdinand Kuhn

Secretary Morgenthau

If you were successful in killing that story with

Kintner and Alsop, I would suggest that you call up Charles
Peake of the British Embassy, and tell him what you have done,
and also tell him where the newspapermen got the information
from; namely, that the bankers were told that they had to
make a sale within a week. Whoever gave out that information certainly does not know anything about public relations.
I think you ought to tell the whole story to Charles Peake.
If you do not agree with me, please discuss it with me.
If you do agree, please go ahead and talk to Mr. Peake.

195
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941.
Secretary Morgenthau
Mr. Kuhn

It was not possible to kill the Kintner and Alsop story on
American Viscose, as the story had already gone out on the wires to

their client papers. I did, however, tell Charles Peake, at the
British Embassy, that the story of pressure on the British to sell
the Viscose Company had been spread by the bankers in New York, who

heard it from Peacock himself. Apparently Peacock said nothing about
any American pressure, but merely told the bankers that he had had
orders from his government to sell the company by Monday, March 14.

Secretary Morgenthau agreed this morning that it was unwise

to make any further efforts with Alsop and Kintner, as the story had
already gone out. Kintner himself telephoned this morning and read
the story to me.
F.K.

196

Me

PLAIN

JT

LONDON

Dated March 18, 1941

Rec'd 11:50 a.m.

Secretary of State,
Washington.

1052, eighteenth.
FOR TREASURY FROM BUTTERWORTH.

In announcing the Viscose sale the British Treasury
statement comments as follows:

"The sale of this valuable holding to American
interests is EVIDENCE of the determination of the British
Government to USE EVERY possible means of self-help at

a time when they are receiving from the Government of the
United States the measures of assistance set out in
President Roosevelt's great speech of last Saturday and

in arriving at this transaction Sir Edward Peacack has
acted with the full knowledge and approval of the United
States Administration.1

Press comment indicates that this deal, with the

realization that others will follow, hurts more than the
liquidation of securities. The TIMES city Editor, after
pointing out that any idea that prolonged negotiations
would

I

197
-2- 1052, March 18, from London
that

would be involved has now been quickly dispelled, states
"the transactions must represent a serious loss to

British industry but such sacrifices had been envisaged.
The MANCHESTER GUARDIAN describes the deal as a

"sharp reminder that the LEASE and Lend Bill has not

solved our dollar problem" and states that "thESE losses
are EVEN more painful than those of general investments
in United States stocks and shares."
Oscar Hobson of the NEWS CHRONICLE USES the phrase

"a first step in that mclancholy process of turning out
our pockets" and concludes "it would be little short of
a tragedy WETE the British insurance companies driven to
throw on the market the valuable goodwill of the EXTENsive American business they have built up OVER many decades.

Einzig in the FINANCIAL NEWS deplores the sale of such

a valuable asset when the needed dollars could in fact be
raised by adequate proceedings against Exchange EVADEIS.

The FINANCIAL TIMES in an Editorial describes the

deal as representing a big sacrifice for Courtaulds and

for Britain and states, "regrettable as the transaction
must be from the company's standpoint it is regrettable
too from that of the nation" and the deal is but one more
reflection of the determination of the British people
to make EVERY sacrifice necessary to win the war."

The rise of Courtaulds shares yesterday from 26

shillings 9 PENCE to 29 shillings is described by the
TIMES

198

-3- 1052, March 18, from London

TIMES as hardly more than a technical adjustment due to

the inclination of dealers to prefer the short rather
than the long of the shares, a capital repayment by the
company being Expected, while the ultimate effect on

Courtauld's profits is less Easy to assess.
WINANT

OSB

199

(Handed by Mr. Stone in the Department of State to Mr. Cochran of the
Treasury when the latter called at the office of the Secretary of
State at 3:30 p.m., March 27. 1941)
PARAPHRASE OF TELEGRAM RECEIVED

FROM: American Embassy, London, England
DATE:

March 18, 1941, 8 p.m.

NO.:

1060

The following is strictly confidential for the President,
the Acting Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury.
Deep concern is expressed by the Prime Minister over
the report which his Chancellor of the Exchequer gave him
that a much smaller part of their existing commitments in
the United States would be taken over under the Lease Lend

Bill than had been anticipated by the British Government.
The British had apparently thought that there would be
released to them about L195,000,000 on account of past
payments on existing commitments. They have now been informed

that not more than 190,000,000 will be released for this
purpose, and the amount may be very considerably less.

Also, they will have to provide future payments on account
of the greater part of commitments already made.

The British believe that in view of the foregoing, it
will be extremely difficult for them, considering their
other requirements, to meet their own and Canadian exchange

requirements in the United States; in order to function properly
in meeting the war emergency, they feel they should have
not less than L150,000,000 for a working balance.

It is the strong belief of the Prime Minister that they
should have more leeway and freedom than are given in the

arrangements

200

-2arrangements now contemplated. He expressed the hope that

the British situation might be sympathetically reconsidered
by the President and Secretary Morgenthau. The thought
occurs to me that it may be Secretary Morgenthau anticipates

more rapid liquidation of securities and investments of the
British than is believed practicable by the Chancellor of
the Exchequer. In order to help you to get the picture
as it was put to the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of
the Exchequer, I quote below the letter of March 17 from
Under Secretary Waley to Mr. Ben Cohen:

(The letter in paraphrase):
# My dear Mr. Cohen:

I set forth below the figures which I mentioned to

you in our talk this morning. It is necessary for us to
take care of

Commitments in the amount of 360,000,000 on existing

contracts made by the U.K. in the U.S.A.
Approximately 150,000,000 in payments by the sterling

area to Canadian gold or dollars.
150,000,000 will be needed to reconstitute a working
balance.

Those payments by the U.K. to the U.S.A. which the
Lease Lend Bill does not cover.

The foregoing would total, say, 660,000,000 in addition
to (omission).

It has not been possible for us to estimate the figure
for

201

-3for the last-mentioned item, as we have not yet had the
necessary information.

The United Kingdom has the following to apply towards
meeting the aforementioned needs:

Visible and invisible exports in the amount of 45,000,000
from the United Kingdom to the United States of America.
An amount of 25,000,000 for the favorable balance of

the rest of the sterling area.
A net total of 90,000,000 in new gold (120,000,000
mined, but 30,000,000 taken off for gold outgoings elsewhere).
An amount of (omission) from the sale of marketable
securities and direct investments.
These items would total 160,000,000, plus (omission).

To estimate the last figure for any particular period
of time it is again difficult; however, it would seem difficult
to figure on an amount more than 150,000,000 within a year.

Taking all of the above figures into account, it would
be indicated that more than L700,000,000 would be needed,

of which there is in sight not more than approximately
1300,000,000. Therefore it would appear that the U.K.

might well find, when it is in a position to figure more
closely, that it will be necessary that commitments on
existing orders in the U.S.A. amounting to 1360,000,000

will have to be taken care of for it, and that the U.K.
receive 1.195,000,000 in reimbursement for advance payments
and

202

4

and capital, in order to be in a position to bridge the gap or at any rate, a large proportion of this assistance will
be necessary.

Sincerely yours, 8. D. Waley."
WINANT.

EA:LWW

203
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE March 18, 1941
TO

Secretary Morgenthau
Mr. Cochran

CONFIDENTIAL

Registered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follows:
£70,000
Sold to commercial concerns
Purchased from commercial concerns £26,000

Open
banks were
as market
follows:

sterling was quoted at 4.03-1/2. Transactions of the reporting
£1,000
Sold to commercial concerns
Purchased from commercial concerns £2,000

In New York, the closing rates for the foreign currencies listed below were

as follows:

15-1/8% discount

Canadian dollar

Swiss franc (commercial)
Swedish krona
Reichamark
Lira

Argentine peso (free)

Brazilian milreis (free)
Cuban peso
Mexican peso

.2321

.2384-1/2
.4005
.0505
.2315
.0505

5-5/8% discount
.2066

In Shanghai, the yuan advanced 1/16 to 5-7/16 Sterling was quoted at

3.93. up 2.

We purchased $22,507,000 in gold from the earmarked account of the National
Bank of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
No new gold engagements were reported.

price at

In London, the spot and forward silver prices were fixed at 23-1/24 and
23-7/16d, respectively. The U. S. equivalents were 42.67 and 42.56

Handy and Harman's settlement for foreign silver was unchanged at
34-3/4#. The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver was also unchanged 35
We made three purchases of silver totaling 200,000 ounces under the Silver
Purchase Act, all of which consisted of new production from foreign countries, for
forward delivery.

204
2-

The report of March 12 received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
diving foreign exchange positions of banks and bankers in its district, revealed
a

that the total position of all countries was short the equivalent of $6,851,000,

lecrease of $435,000 in the short position. Net changes were as follows: Change in
Short Position
Short Position
Short Position*
March 12
March 5

Country

Ingland**
errope
Canada

Latin America
Japan

Other Asia

ill others
Total

$ 515,000
3,207,000

173,000 (Long)
126,000

2,316,000
1,329,000

34,000 (Long)
$7,286,000

$ 410,000
3,091,000
245,000 (Long)
139,000

2,273,000
1,243,000
60,000 (Long)
$6,851,000

- $105,000

- 116,000

- 72,000
+ 13,000
- 43,000
- 86,000

- 26,000
- $435,000

Plus sign (+) indicates increase in short position, or decrease in long position.
Minus sign(-) indicates decrease in short position, or increase in long position.
Combined position in registered and open market sterling.

CONFIDENTIAL

205
BRITISH EMBASSY,
WASHINGTON, D.C.

18th March, 1941.
PERSONAL AND SECRET.

Dear Mr. Secretary,

I enclose herein for your personal and

secret information copies of the two latest reports
received from London on the military situation.
Believe me,

Dear Mr. Secretary,

Very sincerely yours,

Halifex
The Honourable

Henry Morgenthau, Jr.,

United States Treasury,
Washington, D.C.

206

TELEGRAPH FROM LONDON DATED MARCH 15TH. 1941.
NAVAL

1. During an air attack on the Clyde area night of March
13th/14th two destroyers building damaged. Other ships
superficial damage only.

2. At Liverpool night of March 12th/13th 7 merchant vessels
were damaged.

3. off Lowestoft and Yarmouth night of March 14th/15th E-Boats were active. "Versatile" on escort missed by 2 torpedoes

4. Early on March 15th constal aircraft bombed docks at
Breat also warship which may have been a German cruiser.
ROYAL AIR FORCE

5.

Night of March 13th/14th. Attack on industries and
shipyards at Hamburg very ferocious; 84 tons of high explosiv
and 13,000 incendiaries dropped under good conditions.
NIGHT OF MARCH 14th/15th

6.

159 aircraft sent out with main objective synthetic oil
plants at Gelsenkirchen (101 aircraft), other objectives
industrial centres at Dusseldorf (24), petroleum, harbour
at Rotterdam (13), also some mine laying. Two of our air-

craft missing. Four fighters also carried out offensive
operations over aerodromes in north west France.
7. RHODES. Same night 14 aircraft attacked 4 aerodromes

with satisfactory results.
8.

GERMAN AIR FORCE

Reports show that during the night of March 13th/14th,
13 enemy aircraft were destroyed and 6 damaged.

9. MARCH 14th. Activity limited to reconsissance flights
and sea patrols.
10. NIGHT OF 14th-15th About 310 bombers and 69 mine-

layers came over. Attacks widespread and scattered although
main concentration was in Glasgow area. From preliminary
reports 3 enemy aircraft destroyed and one probably destroyed
/by

207

2. (Telegram from London Har. 15/41)

by fighters, also one by anti-sizeraft.
11. Aircraft casualties in operations over and from British
Isles night of March 14th/15th.
German: destroyed 4, probable 1
British: 2 bombers missing,

12. LIBYA. on March 11th enemy aircraft made 8 low flying
attacks on our forward troops at Agheila. Result: 2 casualt-

ies, 4 enemy aircraft shot down by anti-aircroft fire.
130 HOME SECURITY. Night of March 14th/15th Gleagow,

Fire caused among residential property and at 2 factories, 3
tonement buildings demolished. Leeds Telephone Exchange hit.

Considerable damage to shop and industrial property, mainly

by fire. London Some damage at Tilbury Docks. Plymouth,
Some damage was caused in Naval Dockyard and a training estab-

lishment was hit.

14. Casualtion, Night of March 12th/13th. Liverpool and
Birkenhead 156 killed and 70 seriously injured.
Night of March 13th/14th. Glasgow. Glyde

Bank, 115 killed. March 15th. Ordinance factory at Dalmir,
production temporarily stopped owing to interruption of
utility services. No extensive damage reported.

208

TELEGRAM FROM LONDON DATED MARCH 16th. 1941
NAVAL

Britomart bombed in Rye Bay on March 15th has

proceeded to harbour. officer commanding and 88 killed,
P.M. March 15th. Four British merchant ships in
2.

area about seven hundred miles west - North-west from Azores
made enemy raider signals, two reported being shelled.
Further signal received indicated one ship being abandoned.
During air raid on Manchester 11/12th 10 merchant

3.

ships damaged in verying degrees. one Bank.

A.M. March 16th. British forces successfully

4.

landed east and west of BERBERA supported by bombardment by

His Majesty's ships.
Photographs A.M. of March 15th show HIPPER class

5.

cruiser alongside torpedo boat stations, Three merchant
ships off Ostend attacked by bomber command aircraft Deme

March 15th. one ship near miss. LORIENT attacked by aircraft night of March 15th/16th, Seventeen mines were detonated home waters March 15th.

R.A.F. Night of March 15th/16th. Weather conditions

6.

reduced operations 37 aircraft were sent to LORIENT submar-

ine base and 21 to industrial target at Dueselldorf; one
aircraft has not returned.
Albania. over Keloyre on March 14th fifteen British
7.
fightere intercepted an enemy formation of 15 bombers escorted by 36 fighters and definitely destroyed seven enemy air-

craft and probably five more. Two of our fighters shot down
but pilote saved.
German Airforce. March 15th. strong defensive
8.

patrols were maintained in Dover straits. A few aircraft
penetrated a short distance over Kent; our fighters probably
destroyed one Messerschnidt 109.
9.

Night of March 15th/16th. About 100 enemy sircraft
/were

209

2. (Telegram from London Nars 16/41.)

were operating over wide areas although London was the chief

objective. Country was clear abortly after midnight. owing
to deteriorating weather conditions action by OUR night fightera was almost impossible.
10.

Aircraft casualties in operations over and from the

British Isles. German: destroyed one, probable one, damaged
one. British: one bomber missing.
11.
Home Security. Night of March 15th/16th. Several
bombs were dropped in London and Home Counties but no important

damage reported although casualties, considering the scale of

the attack appear rather highs preliminary estimate 70 killed
and 200 wounded. Some fires were started in the dook area,

at a paint factory and a gas works but were soon put out.
12.
Clyde Bank. Situation reported completely in hand
although damage especially to dwelling houses is extensive.
An orderly voluntary evacuation from the area of

about 205,000 has taken place. Morale is excellent. Casualties
night of March 14th/15th reported 120 killed and 394 wounded.

210
RESTRICTED

M.I.D., W.D.
0-2/2657-220

March 18, 1941

No. 342

12:00 M.
SITUATION REPORT

I.

Western Theater of War.

Air: German. Light activity by day and night. Some
bombs were dropped on Newcastle-on-Tyme and along the east coast

of Scotland last night.

British. Moderate offensive activity last night
centering on Bremen and Wilhelmshaven.

II.

Balkan Theater of War.

Ground: Bulgaria. No change.

Albania. Normal activity by patrols and artillery.

Air: No reports of activity.
III. Mediterranean and African Theaters of War.
Ground: British Somaliland. Berbera, the seaport and

capital of British Somaliland, which fell to the Italians last August

was recaptured by British forces March 16.

Eritrea. The British claim they have captured
important heights in positions covering Cheren.

Air: Sharp fighting by small forces incident to the capture of Berbera.

Note: This military situation report is issued by the Military Intelligence Division, General Staff. In view of the occasional inclusion of political information
and of opinion it is classified as
RESTRICTED
Restricted.

CONFIDENTIAT

211

of Sale
Received as the - Department

at S:33, March 18, will

Decharent, filed syste, March 27, 1944.

1. - divisions - - is Bulgeria. This number
incinies three amount divisions. There is also - based on Bulgerios airdreams, a Common Air Garge of two ets divisions.

2. Yea further - divisions are still in Senate. These distributed as follows
Meldevia . 6 divisions
Behavija - 2 divisions
Instructional Units distributed over
coming . 2 divisions

3. There are also two - air divisions been - airfields. there are, therefore, four - air divisions is all in the Baltera
area. These air Suress are serviced w a large force of - personal.

4. Forty traine assive daily in Seconda from - with large
chiparate of military equipment and explies. In addition, other emplies

are arriving - Demac river barges. It is estimated that about see of all
these emplies are destined for troops - in the Beline area while the other

50% are reserved for - divisions which are you to arrive. a

ties of - beague is Basala is - - a I seale that as
would seen that - tabula to matatata is I a foree of beloom s
- 30 divisions.
5. A high making - air officer is Declaration stated mounty

that while attenting Distates - a take to Viewn, be and talked
to Cowing. Searing self,

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

212

The - order of Banage is - being establishes, penerfully

where possible, who m with the ald of - wage. - just
wister was a difficult - n will gata the victory as our price.
Brea if the U.S.A. should - in filling Groat Britata with
am such - addientment would not - - Regists vistory."
6. Another high making - in Declares states,
" program is to 1 the British off the continues. Match

how - pasts them out of the then abortly you will - the

-

- performence - the Ibartes Justicale."

Distributions
Secretary of Mar
State Department

Secretary of Treasury
Asst. Secretary of War

thief of Staff

Yes Plans Division

office of Noral Intelligence

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

213

or Sale /
Received as the w Department

as 11/97, March 18, M.

Loston, filed 17:00, March 10, rahs.

1. During the night of March 17-18 there - as British please

over the Centinent. a Montay, March BY stores of - as Finahing the target of - Britter plans. the result of this seed could not be w
termined. During the night of March 16-37 there - as activities - the

part of the Reyel Ats Pereo.

2. During the night of March 17-18 - / please were pletted

over Britata. - was over - - over Hand, to over
Wish, and six over Missing - Burnick. the extent of the - done w
these suide has not been determined. During the speecing my - -

because was active - - Sections, - too others were over the
Heat area. the - maintained patrels over the Dover Stemite and a

wall nonber of Comma please were active - the Bristel / as

- minutesa. British fighters l the - - busher
which attented I

3. Reporte or the - weight w - attents during the

night of March 16-37 have - I available. AS I the Social
Smiliting Washe outfused serious I During the - seid - Bristel

- this night fives - started w the - midere which - employed

in the initial / of the attack. these midere - followed w Describe that happed high explosive business - I mass. Detente -

- the l water - - distributing system outforced - -

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

214

4. / of the Business in made Statem Members - follows: in Britzon, the high - overleeking the city of - taben w British beat farees and British attention Italian positions

- this city, in Albenta, Italian staffeide as Velon - - were
attented w Bristen in Miles, Bestian busture started state destroyed four Ants please during attachs - the Metro as

Illegate and the Geotal Denito atmirus - Briggle, is seven
Italian please - the - as Disclose were destroyed w Brittah fighters.
5. there - no reports of Aste ats activity in made Sustem
theaters.

6. According to British Your office information refeges in numbers - moving from estima Massienta - Three to the met.
According to the - course atvilian more is Salestin was not month as
antistactory as so was is Athons.

7. Year of the - also mentily planted in the Base have not yet bom exploint. For this - the south - of the - to
not yet eges to tweffic.

-

8. Daring the afternoon of March 16 a -

three British cango bests in the Astenatic. a extent of the d has not yes been separate

Distributions

Secretary of State Department

Decretary of Treasury

A Secretary of Mer
Other of Staff

the Please Division

office of Small Intelligence
Air Garge
6-3

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

215

of Date
Received as the Mar

as 16:35, March 28, MA.

Indurent, filed March 18, will.

- Air Force Watte are - - Shotos - in the future will be operating effectively. This information has book

furnished - w the - Air Attache.
BASK

Destributions
Secretary of Year
State Department
Secretary
of Treasury
of
A Secretary
Mar

Chief of Shaff

War Please Division

office of Neval Intelligence

CONFIDENTIAL

216

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,

Wednesday, March 19, 1941.

Press Service
No. 24-7

3/18/41

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today offered for cash
subscription, through the Federal Reserve Banks, at par and accrued
interest, $500,000,000, or thereabouts, of 11-13-year 2-1/2 percent
Treasury Bonds of 1952-54, and at the same time offered the holders

of 1-3/8 percent Treasury Notes of Series B-1941, maturing

June 15, the privilege of exchanging such notes for additional
amounts of the Treasury bonds now offered for cash subscription,

or for 3/4 percent Treasury Notes of Series D-1943, dated March 15,
1941, the exchanges in either case to be made par for par, with
interest adjustments as of March 31, 1941. An additional amount of
$50,000,000, or thereabouts, of the bonds may be sold to Government

Investment Accounts during the next month. For the benefit of

small investors, preferential allotment will be given to cash subscribers up to $5,000 of the bonds, where delivery in registered
bonds 90 days after the issue date 18 specified; those who enter

such a subscription for preferential allotment may not enter any
other cash subscription.

The Treasury Bonds of 1952-54, now offered for cash subscrip-

tion and in exchange for the notes due June 15, 1941, will be dated
March 31, 1941, and will bear interest from that date at the rate
of 2-1/2 percent per annum, payable semiannually. The first coupon
due September 15, 1941, will be for a fractional period. The bonds

217

2-

will mature March 15, 1954, but may be redeemed, at the option of

the United States, on and after March 15, 1952. They will be
issued in two forms: bearer bonds with interest coupons attached,
and bonds registered both as to principal and interest. Both forms
will be issued in the denominations of $50, $100, $500, $1,000,
$5,000, $10,000 and $100,000.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Public Debt Act of 1941,
interest upon the bonds now offered shall not have any exemption,

as such, under Federal Tax Acts now or hereafter enacted. Otherwise
the securities will be accorded the same exemptions from texation 83
are accorded other issues of Treasury bonds now outstanding. These

provisions are specifically set forth in the official circular
released today.

The 3/4 percent Treasury Notes of Series D-1943 now offered

in exchange for the notes maturing June 15, 1941, will be an
addition to and will form a part of the series issued pursuant to
Treesury Department Circular No. 650, dated February 25, 1941.

They are identical in all respects with such notes, with which they
will be freely interchangeable. The notes are dated March 15, 1941,
and bear interest from that date. They will mature March 15, 1943,

and will not be subject to call for redemption before maturity.

As set forth in the official circular released today, interest upon
the notes shall not have any exemption, as such, under Federal
Tax Acts now or hereafter enacted.

218
-3Subscriptions will be received at the Federal Reserve Banks
and Branches, and at the Treasury Department, Washington. Banking

institutions generally may submit subscriptions for account of
customers, but only the Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasury

Department are authorized to act as official agencies. Cash subscriptions for the bonds from banks and trust companies for their
own account will be received without deposit but will be restricted
in each case to an amount not exceeding one-half of the combined

capital and surplus of the subscribing bank or trust company. Cash
subscriptions from all others must be accompanied by payment of 10
percent of the amount of bonds applied for. Exchange subscriptions
should be accompanied by a like face amount of 1-3/8 percent
Treasury Notes of Series B-1941, due for payment on June 15, 1941,

with final coupon due June 15, 1941, attached. If the maturing
notes are tendered in exchange for the new Treasury bonds, accrued
interest from December 15, 1940 to March 31, 1941, about $4.004

per $1,000 face amount, will be paid the owners of the surrendered

notes following their acceptance. If the maturing notes are tendered
in exchange for 3/4 percent Treasury Notes of Series D-1943, the
difference between the accrued interest from December 15, 1940 to

March 31, 1941, on the surrendered notes and the accrued interest
from March 15 to March 31, 1941, on the notes to be issued, about
$3.678 per $1,000 face amount, will be paid the owners of the
surrendered notes following their acceptance.

The right is reserved to close the books as to any or all
subscriptions or classes of subscriptions at any time without notice

219

-4Subject to the reservations set forth in the official circulars,
all exchange subscriptions will be ellotted in full. The basis of
allotment of cash subscriptions will be publicly announced, end
payment for any bonds allotted must be mede or completed on or

before Merch 31, 1941, or on leter allotment.
.There are now outstanding $503,877,500 of 1-3/8 percent
Treasury Notes of Series B-1941, maturing June 15, 1941. The

present offerings of Trersury bonds and Trersury notes efford to
holders of the maturing notes on opportunity to exchange them for

other interest-beering obligations of the United States. Any
notes not so exchanged at this time will be paid in cash following
their presentation on and after June 15, 1941.

The texts of the official circulo rs follow:

220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

2-1/2 PERCENT TREASURY BONDS OF 1952-54

Dated and bearing interest from March 31, 1941

Due March 15, 1954

REDEEMABLE AT THE OPTION OF THE UNITED STATES AT PAR AND ACCRUED

INTEREST ON AND AFTER MARCH 15, 1952

Interest payable March 15 and September 15
TREASURY DEPARTMENT,

1941

Department Circular No. 651

Office of the Secretary,

Washington, March 19, 1941.

Fiscal Service
Bureau of the Public Debt
I. OFFERING OF BONDS

1. The Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the authority of
the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended, invites subscriptions, at
par and accrued interest, from the people of the United States for
2-1/2 percent bonds of the United States, designated Treasury Bonds

of 1952-54. The amount of the public offering is $500,000,000, or
thereabouts, with the right reserved to the Secretary of the
Treasury to increase the offering by an amount sufficient to accept
all subscriptions for which Treasury Notes of Series B-1941, maturing
June 15, 1941, are tendered in payment and accepted. In addition to
the amount offered for public subscription, $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of these bonds may be allotted to Government investment
accounts against cash payment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF BONDS

1. The bonds will be dated March 31, 1941, and will bear
interest from that date at the rate of 2-1/2 percent per annum,
payable on a semiannual basis on September 15, 1941, and thereafter

on March 15 and September 15 in each year until the principal

221

-2 amount becomes payable. They will mature March 15, 1954, but may be

redeemed at the option of the United States on and After March 15,

1952, in whole or in part, at par and accrued interest, on any interest day or days, on four montha' notice of redemption given in
such manner as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe. In
case of partial redemption the bonds to be redeemed will be determined by such method as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the

Treasury. From the date of redemption designated in any such notice,
interest on the bonds called for redemption shall cease.

2. The income derived from the bonds shall be subject to all
Federal taxes, now or hereafter imposed. The bonds shall be subject

to estate, inheritance, gift or other excise taxes, whether Federal
or State, but shall be exempt from all taxation now or hereafter imposed on the principal or interest thereof by any State, or any of
the possessions of the United States, or by any local taxing authority
3. The bonds will be acceptable to secure deposits of public
moneys, but will not bear the circulation privilege and will not be
entitled to any privilege of conversion.
4. Bearer bonds with interest coupons attached, and bonds

registered as to principal and interest, will be issued in denominations of $50, $100, $500, 81,000, $5,000, $10,000 and $100,000. Pro

vision will be made for the interchange of bonds of different denominations and of coupon and registered bonds, and for the transfer

of registered bonds, under rules and regulations prescribed by the
3ecretary of the Treasury.

5. The bonda will be subject to the general regulations of the
Treasury Department, now or hereafter prescribed, governing United
States bonds.

222
-3III. SUBSCRIPTION AND ALLOTMENT

1. Subscriptions will be received at the Federal Reserve
Banks and Branches and at the Treasury Department, Washington.

Subscribers must agree not to sell or otherwise dispose of their
subscriptions, or of the securities which may be allotted thereon,

prior to the closing of the subscription books. Banking institutions generally may submit subscriptions for account of customers,
but only the Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasury Department are

authorized to act as official agencies. Others than banking
institutions will not be permitted to enter subscriptions except
for their own account. Cash subscriptions from banks and trust
companies for their own account will be received without deposit
but will be restricted in each case to an amount not exceeding one-

half of the combined capital and surplus of the subscribing bank
or trust company. Cash subscriptions from all others must be
accompanied by payment of 10 percent of the amount of bonds applied
for.

2. The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to reject
any subscription, in whole or in part, to allot less than the
amount of bonds applied for, and to close the books as to any or
all subscriptions at any time without notice; and any action he may

take in these respects shall be final. Cash subscriptions
for amounts up to and including $5,000 where the subscribers specify

that delivery be made in registered bonds 90 days after the issue

date will be given preferred allotment. In each such case a sub-

223

-4scriber may not enter any other cash subscription, and payment

must be made as provided in Section IV of this circular, Subject to these reservations, subscriptions in payment of which
Treasury Notes of Series B-1941 are tendered will be allotted in

full. Allotment notices will be sent out promptly upon allotment,
and the basis of the allotment will be publicly announced.
IV. PAYMENT

1. Payment at par and accrued interest, if any, for bonds
allotted to the public on cash subscriptions hereunder must be mede

or completed on or before March 31, 1941, or on later allotment.
In every case where payment is not so completed, the payment with

application up to 10 percent of the amount of bonds applied for
shall, upon declaration made by the Secretary of the Treasury in

his discretion, be forfeited to the United States. Any qualified
depositary will be permitted to make payment by credit for bonds

allotted to it for itself and its customers up to any amount for
which it shall be qualified in excess of existing deposits, when
so notified by the Federal Reserve Bank of its district. Treasury
Notes of Series B-1941, maturing June 15, 1941, with coupon dated

June 15, 1941, attached, will be accepted at par in payment for any
bonds subscribed for and allotted, and should accompany the sub-

scription. Accrued interest from December 15, 1940 to March 31,

1941 ($4.00412 per $1,000), will be paid following acceptance of
the notes.

-V. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. As fiscal agents of the United States, Federal Reserve
Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions, to
make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by
the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks of the

respective districts, to issue allotment notices, to receive payment for bonds ellotted, to make delivery of bonds on full-paid
subscriptions allotted, and they may issue interim receipts pending

delivery of the definitive bonds.
2. The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time, or from
time to time, prescribe supplemental or amendatory rules and
regulations governing the offering, which will be communicated
promptly to the Federal Reserve Banks.
HENRY MORGENTHAU, JR.

Secretary of the Treasury.

224
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

3/4 PERCENT TREASURY NOTES OF SERIES D-1943

Dated and bearing interest from March 15, 1941 - Due March 15,1943
Interest payable March 15 and September 15
ADDITIONAL ISSUE

-

TREASURY DEPARTMENT,

1941

Department Circular No. 652

Office of the Secretary,

Washington, March 19, 1941.

Fiscal Service
Bureau of the Public Debt
I. OFFERING OF NOTES

1. The Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the authority
of the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended, invites subscriptions,

at par and accrued interest, from the people of the United States
for 3/4 percent notes of the United States, designated Treasury
Notes of Series D-1943, in payment of which only Treasury Notes
of Series B-1941, maturing June 15, 1941, may be tendered. The

amount of the offering under this circular will be limited to the
amount of Treasury Notes of Series B-1941 tendered and accepted.
II. DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

1. The notes now offered will be an addition to and will form
a part of the series of 3/4 percent Treasury Notes of Series
D-1943 issued pursuant to Department Circular No. 650, dated

February 25, 1941, will be freely interchangeable therewith, are
identical in all respects therewith, and are described in the
following quotation from Department Circular No. 650:

"1. The notes will be dated March 15, 1941, and will bear
interest from that date at the rate of 3/4 percent per annum,

225

2-

payable semiannually on September 15, 1941, and thereafter
on March 15 and September 15 in each year until the
principal amount becomes payable. They will mature March
15, 1943, and will not be subject tc call for redemption prior
to maturity.

"2. The income derived from the notes shall be subject
to all Federal taxes, now or hereafter imposed. The notes shall
be subject to estate, inheritance, gift or other excise
taxes, whether Federal or State, but shall be exempt from all
taxation now or hereafter imposed on the principal or
interest thereof by any State, or any of the possessions of
the United States, or by any local taxing authority.
"3. The notes will be accepted at par during such time
and under such rules and regulations as shall be prescribed
or approved by the Secretary of the Treasury in payment of
income and profits taxes payable at the maturity of the notes.
#4. The notes will be acceptable to secure deposits of
public moneys, but will not bear the circulation privilege.
"5. Bearer notes with interest coupons attached will be
issued in denominations of $100, $500, $1,000, $5,000,
$10,000 and $100,000. The notes will not be issued in
registered form.

"6. The notes will be subject to the general regulations

of the Treasury Department, now or hereafter prescribed,
governing United States notes."
III. SUBSCRIPTION AND ALLOTMENT

1. Subscriptions will be received at the Federal Reserve
Banks and Branches and at the Treasury Department, Washington.

Banking institutions generally may submit subscriptions for account
of customers, but only the Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasury

Department are authorized to act as official agencies.

2. The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to

reject any subscription, in whole or in part, and to close the
books as to any or all subscriptions at any time without notice;
and any action he may take in these respects shall be final.

226
-3Subject to these reservations, all subscriptions will be allotted
in full. Allotment notices will be sent out promptly upon allotment.

IV. PAYMENT

1. Payment at par and accrued interest for notes allotted
hereunder must be made or completed on or before March 31, 1941,

on or later allotment, and may be made only in Treasury Notes of
Series B-1941, maturing June 15, 1941, which will be accepted at
par, and should accompany the subscription. Coupons dated June
15, 1941 should be attached, and accrued interest from December
15, 1940 to March 31, 1941 ($4.00412 per $1,000) on the maturing

notes will be credited, and accrued interest from March 15 to
March 31, 1941 ($0.32609 per $1,000) on the new notes will be

charged, to subscribers. The difference ($3.67803 per $1,000)
will be paid following acceptance of the notes,
V. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. As fiscal agents of the United States, Federal Reserve
Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions, to
make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by
the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks

of the respective districts, to issue allotment notices, to
receive payment for notes allotted, to make delivery of notes

on full-paid subscriptions allotted, and they may issue interim
receipts pending delivery of the definitive notes.

227

2. The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time, or from
time to time, prescribe supplemental or amendatory rules and

regulations governing the offering, which will be communicated
promptly to the Federal Reserve Banks.
HENRY MORGENTHAU, JR.,

Secretary of the Treasury.

228

J

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
DATE March 19,1941
Secretary Morgenthau

TO

Mr. Cochran

FROM

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

At 9:20 this morning Mr. Knoke telephoned me that late yesterday evening the
Federal Reserve Bank at New York had received from the National Bank of Yugoalavia
& cablegram confirming their order for the sale of $22,500,000 of gold, but cancel-

ling the order for the transfer of one half of the proceeds to the account of the

Central Bank of Argentina with the Federal. Since the Federal had already sent a
cablegram to Argentina notifying the Central Bank of the transfer ordered by the
Yugoslav National Bank, a follow-up message was sent citing the instruction from
Ingoslavia. This morning a reply was received from Argentina to the effect that
the Central Bank of that country had not received any instructions from Belgrade to
expect this transfer of funds from the Yugoslav National Bank and consequently ac-

cepted the cancellation of the transfer. The situation is, therefore, that we pur-

chased the gold as of yesterday and that one half of the proceeds has been paid
over to the Chase to the account of the Banco do Brasil, and that the other half of
the proceeds remains in the dollar account of the Yugoslav National Bank with the

Federal.

At the 9:30 staff meeting I reported this development to the Secretary.
At 10:00 I telephoned this information to Assistant Secretary of State Acheson.
who felt that this indicated that our representations to the Yugoslav Government had
been at least 50 percent successful, and that this action on the part of the Yugoslavs
night be interpreted as a good sign. He said he would promptly convey the information to Action Secretary Welles.

TMR

229

March 19, 1941
9:30 a.m.

GROUP MEETING

Present:

Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Thompson

Mr. Pehle

Mr. Haas
Mr. Young
Mr. Kuhn
Mr. Schwarz
Mr. Gaston
Mr. Graves

Mr. White
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Foley

Mr. Bell
Mrs. Klotz

H.M.Jr:

You people have most likely been wondering

why we haven't had any staff meetings, but

I just did it to save embarrassment for the
friendly sons of St. Patrick who have been
so conspicuous by their absence.

Sullivan:

It wouldn't have embarrassed us a bit yesterday.

H.M.Jr:

Tell the story about it.

Sullivan:

About what?

H.M.Jr:

About how Ed felt that he didn't --

Sullivan:

Oh, we were going to get up very early and
some how or other we didn't, so I went in

230

-2 Ed's room and I called to find out if there
had been a nine thirty meeting. No. Did

the Secretary call? No. I said, "Call
Mr. Foley's office and see if he called in
there. No. He can't do that to us, they
can't run that place without us. (Laughter)
My mother is leaving on the ten o'clock, and

she is in my office, and I would like to

take her to the train unless there is something special. May I be excused?
H.M.Jr:

Please. There are two things. Have you heard
anything about the bond issues this morning?

Bell:

No, it is pretty early.

H.M.Jr:

I have this memorandum which came in last

night from Jerome Frank which I haven't had
a chance to read.
Bell:

I just glanced through it hurriedly. It has

H.M.Jr:

You let both Haas and White see it. It has
to do with, as I understand it, something

some merit, but you had better look at it.

that the Army asked them in connection with

future financing, you see, capital.

Bell:

It is along the lines of the old capital

H.M.Jr:

Well, if there is going to be any such thing,
it is going to be here.

Bell:

I think that is absolutely right.

H.M.Jr:

Where is George? George, somebody gave me

issues commi ttee during the last war.

this morning a very interesting chart which
I have never seen one like it before. He
has taken the net corporate receipts going

231

-3back to '26 and compared it with the working

capital of the corporation, and in this thing

he shows that the spiral in '37 started downward

due to a lack of working capital. Using - that
if business net receipts go above 60 billion
dollars, he thinks we will need 30 billion
dollars of working capital, and we will be
short about five this year; and for plant
expansion another five to ten billion, you
see.

Now, have you any such studies in your place?
Haas:

We are working on that same problem in connection

H.M.Jr:

Well, will you do it just this way and see

with the --

what you get? The net corporation receipts
and working capital, going back - he went back
to '26. He is convinced that the downward

spiral in '37 was a result of a shortage of
working capital. That was one of the factors.
Two, that for this year there will be a

shortage of around five billion on working
capital and for plant expansion another five
or ten; in other words, between ten and fifteen

Bell:
H.M.Jr:

billion dollars shortage. That fits in with
this thing of Frank's, doesn't it?
It fits in as a part of that study, yes.

I would like very much when I get back to have
an answer on this working capital thing, George,
please.

Haas:

I have got some people working on that same
problem.

H.M.Jr:

Well, let me have something, will you? It

has never been put up to me like that before.

232

-4Haas:

It ties in also with your Treasury financing.

H.M.Jr:

Well, what do you think I mentioned it for?

Haas:

I thought maybe you were considering it from

H.M.Jr:

No.

Haas:

H.M.Jr:

the point of view of the effect on business.
It works both ways.

It is the same thing. And then this thing
coming in last night from Jerome Frank brings
it to a head.
Herbert?

Gaston:

You sent me in a memorandum yesterday in regard

to cutters. There didn't appear to be anything
that we are to do on that. It appeared to be
taken up through other channels.

Gaston:

That is right.
And then this material here that Mr. --

H.M.Jr:

Have you read it?

Gaston:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Then just send it back to me.

Gaston:

You didn't want anybody else in our organization

H.M.Jr:

Well, Waesche.

Gaston:

Yes. Well, that is what I was thinking, I
might let him look at it.
And then get it back - not Purvis' letter, but

H.M.Jr:

H.M.Jr:

to have a look at it?

233

5-

the rest of it goes back to Captain Callahan.
Purvis letter belongs to me, and Captain
Callahan, the aide to the President, sent

the rest of it to me. There is a note in
there from him.

Gaston:

Yes, but I didn't recognize anything as being

a Purvis letter. Is it this one here? No,
I didn't see any Purvis letter. Oh, here it

is. I just didn't see that.

You wanted to speak to me some time about this
book and the Rueckswander Mark some time today

or tomorrow and if the decision is final as

to the cutters, we need to take up through some
channel the question of weather service ships
and I presume if we get the proper authority,
we can take it up through Land.

H.M.Jr:

Well, Herbert, you will just have to fight your
own battle. I can't get to do any more on it,
and if they pull these ships out, I just wouldn't
wor ry about the weather business. The way to

do things now days is just to pull the ships
out. Don't give them any weather service. And
then let somebody holler.

Gaston:

And just to call their attention to what it
does.

H.M.Jr:

We will just pull the ships out.

Gaston:

All right.
Pull the ships out. You can't sit around in
Washington these days and wait for somebody
to act. Just pull these ships out and then

H.M.Jr:

let Pan American shriek.

Gaston:

Yes. It won't be only Pan American, it will
be the English.

234

6-

H.M.Jr:

Pull them out and then let somebody yell
about it, and then maybe the President

will act.

Gaston:

All right. I don't know whether a memorandum
came to you which I wrote yesterday on a
letter which I - a letter or a memorandum
which I think you hadn't seen from Land about
the acquisition of-a scheme for the acquisition
of 33 German ships.

H.M.Jr:

I won't look at it before I go away.

Gaston:

You won't?

H.M.Jr:

No, sir.

Gaston:

They asked our views solely on the question of

whether we would have objections to the payment

of twelve and a half million to the Germans
for the ships and we have indicated to them

that that isn't a particularly material point,
that if they insist on deciding the main
question themselves as to whether we should
allow Americans to buy these 33 German ships,

that that is the question and the mere question

of the transfers of twelve and a half million
dollars of American funds to Germany isn't

particularly important.
H.M.Jr:

I won't be able to absorb anything new.

Gaston:

All right. Well, we can go ahead and express
our view on the thing.

H.M.Jr:

Bell is Acting Secretary.

Gaston:

O.K.

H.M.Jr:

Sorry, but I just can't. I am going to try
to clean up.

235

-7Gaston:

Fine. All right.

H.M.Jr:

Did you get my message about those two

Gaston:

Yes, I did. I sent a note to you yesterday,
but he wasn't able to deliver it.

tickets?

Gaston:

Oh. All right. Is there a note on it?
I sent a note, but it didn't get to you. It

H.M.Jr:

Do you want to give it to me?

Gaston:

Yes. He handed it back to me this morning.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Ed?

Foley:

Sam Clark wanted us to come over to a meeting

H.M.Jr:

is in my pocket.

to help draft that legislation on the defense
activities from sales taxes and transaction
taxes.

H.M.Jr:

Not until Thursday afternoon.

Foley:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

Anything else? That is putting somebody with

Foley:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

Merle?

Cochran:

Knoke just telephoned at 9:20 on the transaction
of the Yugoslavs. The Bank of Yugoslavia can-

Peacock. I think we will let that go. We
will take it up after I get back.

celed the transaction with Argentina. It is
only the Brazilian this time.

236

-8H.M.Jr:

How much was to go to Argentina?

Cochran:

Eleven million two hundred twenty-five thousand.

H.M.Jr:

They are leaving that here?

Cochran:

That is left here. They had already paid it
out, and then they got Argentina to give it

back again. Argentina had had no instructions

on it. It is out of the twenty-two and a half
sold so we just lose the eleven and a quarter.

H.M.Jr:

That is 50 per cent gold?

Cochran:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

The fact that they are leaving eleven million

Cochran:

with us is a little bit cheering, isn't it?
I think so. I will tell Mr. Acheson about it
this morning.

Cochran:

The Canadians and British were in this morning
and left some documents. I am having them

photostated, and will leave them. I have
made a little memo of what they want to talk
about this morning. They are coming in in
two groups. I will pass the photostats around
because I think you might want Mr. Foley and
Mr. Cox there.
H.M.Jr:

Who else? Bell, White --

Cochran:

And either Mr. Foley or Mr. Cox on the LendLease.

H.M.Jr:

Mr. Foley or whoever he wants to bring with
him.

Foley:

In here?

237

H.M.Jr:

Yes, five minutes of eleven.

Cochran:

I will get the documents to them.

H.M.Jr:

That will be good.

Cochran:

H.M.Jr:
Cochran:

Then I had a cable from Butterworth giving
the British press comment on the Viscose
sale. Do you want to see that?

No, just tell me. Is it good or bad?
It is mixed. They think it is a serious
matter, getting rid of these, but it shows
they are sincere and so on.

Pehle:

I have nothing.

H.M.Jr:

Good.

Kuhn:

Nothing.

H.M.Jr:

Yes you have. Now, when are we going to when am I going to be shown this various
publicity for the defense savings bonds
for Friday morning.

Bell:

Harold wanted to stay a few minutes after

H.M.Jr:

He isn't going to be able to.

Bell:

He is not?

H.M.Jr:

No, We will do business right now.

Graves:

Well, we have a release in draft subject to

this --

some revisions that Mr. Kuhn is making. We

will be ready any time. In fact, I asked
for that release without fail by the close

of today to make sure that it would be ready.

238

- 10 H.M.Jr:

What I was thinking of was this. I have

mentioned in two press conferences - I can't

take it. So I thought we could do it all at
the 10:30 press conference and tell them it
is a release for Friday morning newspapers.

Bell:

Tomorrow morning.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Schwarz:

Give it to them tomorrow for Friday.

H.M.Jr:

Do you agree?

Schwarz:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Then what you fellows had better do is come
in here at about 10:15 tomorrow morning and
go over the whole thing with me and have it

all ready. All right, Chick?

Schwarz:

Fine.

H.M.Jr:

From the way these men talk, Chick, I think
you are going to have to get after them.

Bell:

Is that going to give you enough time in case
you want to make any changes?

H.M.Jr:

Well, when will they have it ready?

Bell:

I think this afternoon we could show it to
you.

H.M.Jr:

Four o'clock?

Graves:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I thought we would announce who was going to

work. That was Bell's suggestion. The whole

business. I mean, the people we brought down

239
- 11 -

and Marion Edwards and all the rest of it.

Yes? No?
Graves:

Well, I have here a release that I think we
ought to get out today on Edwards, because

Edwards is going to Louisville as your
representative.

Bell:

And that also covers the others, doesn't it?

Graves:

In the first place, we never got around to

H.M.Jr:

Well, that doesn't mean that that uses up

Thompson:

No, if you have a memo, we can switch them
over. Mr. Pehle can go on Foreign Funds

fixing his status. We prepared an appointment
for him as Assistant to the Secretary, which
Dan and I think should be --

that - there are six of them.
and so on.

Bell:

Mr. Secretary, he said he only wanted expenses.
He can't get expenses out of $5.00 a day, so
we are paying him $22.00 a day as an assistant,
and he can work as many days as he wants to

and put in as many days expenses on that basis.

Graves:

Here is a letter which Dan and I think you
should sign, to Mr. Houston, notifying him
that Mr. Edwards is there as your representative.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Now what about the publicity?

Graves:

This is the publicity on him which I think we
ought to get out right away, because he is
functioning down there today.

H.M.Jr:

"Secretary Morgenthau today appointed Mr.

B. M. Edwards, president of the South Carolina
National Bank and the only National Bank who

240

- 12 -

voted for Franklin D. Roosevelt."
Schwarz:

All 15 branches.

H.M.Jr:

What do you think of that, Herbert?

Gaston:

That is all right. (Laughter)

Haas:

So much to the good.

H.M.Jr:

Mr. Edwards - these pretty young men are

Gaston:

I would strike out "only." There might be

H.M.Jr:

"Mr. Edwards, who is also a director of the

full of ideas.
one other.

of the Charlotte branch of the Richmond Federal

Reserve Bank, will serve as liaison officer

between the Treasury and the nation's banks
in connection with the defense financing program.

His assignment will cover various phases of
the effort to sell savings stamps and bonds
of small denominations, as well as securities
of larger denominations.

"Mr. Edwards is a member of the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation's advisory board at

Charlotte, North Carolina, the South Carolina
Council for Defense, and a director of the

Columbia, South Carolina, Chamber of Commerce."

Shall we put that in too? It sort of waters
it down. Do you like him?

Graves:

Very much. He has made more headway in two

on our stuff than I thought it would be

for
oneany
to He
do. is and fine. The
possible
days
only trouble is, he is a pessimist perhaps
one other little trouble is, he wants to go

back and work for his own bank.

241
- 13 H.M.Jr:

Well, we will cure him of that.

Graves:

He is grand. He is A-1 in every respect.

H.M.Jr:

When is he coming back?

Graves:

He will be here Tuesday.

H.M.Jr:

Four o'clock then?

Kuhn:

Four o'clock, sir.

H.M.Jr:

The Kintner and Alsop thing was all right,
all except the last paragraph, but that was
their personal opinion, which they are entitled
to. Did you like Edward?

Kuhn:

Very much. He was in at a meeting with Dan

Bell yesterday, and I think Dan will agree
about him.

Bell:

He is very good.

H.M.Jr:

Philip? I have had nothing from the bedroom
on the second floor.

Young:

H.M.Jr:

I am going on the bedroom circuit at ten, and

I will ask to be excused. Perhaps I will call
it the short circuit.

You are going on the bedroom circuit? (Laughter)
When?

Young:

At ten o'clock. I will ask to be excused. A

memorandum is being typed up for you on this
Mexican airman whom Wallace spoke to you about.

H.M.Jr:

I am lunching with him.

Young:

I will have it sent in to Mrs. Klots in case I
don't get back in time for you to sign it.

242

- 14 H.M.Jr:

Right.

Young:

It is all right to tell the Bedroom Boys

that we are planning on beginning to
liquidate tomorrow on the foreign end?

H.M.Jr:

Tell who?

Young:

Harry.

243
- 16 -

H.M.Jr:

Yes. You know, Cox and Young, I have nicknamed them the Harry Hopkins Bedroom Boys.

(Laughter) All right.

Incidentally, you know, you might suggest
to Harry, you might get a double decker and
then you could go to bed too.
Young:

Those posts are too tall. It would be too

high up.
H.M.Jr:

Good luck,

Young:

Thank you.

H.M.Jr:

George?

That is the bed Lincoln died in.
Klotz:

He didn't die there. That is not in the White
House.

H.M.Jr:

Yes. They have got the bed that he died in.

Haas:

You wrote that (handing memorandum to Secre-

tary) after you talked to Mr. Foley.

H.M.Jr:

I have already talked to him.

Haas:

All right. There is one thing on that that
bothers me a little bit. Part of our disagreement, a large part, is on that very

confidential document, and it is all right
talking to the person that wrote it, but I

mean to go outside - I wanted to get your
idea on that.
H.M.Jr:

I guess you had better not.

Haas:

I will confine it, then, to the author.

244
- 17 H.M.Jr:

Yes. Anything else, George.

Haas:

That is all I have. Did you want me to send
anybody up to New York on this thing? I
forgot to ask you.

H.M.Jr:

Did you get anything last time?

Haas:

Well, he got some experience and picked up

some information. I based that chart on
some of the things I told him to get while he

was up there.
H.M.Jr:

Then send him up.

Klotz:

He got some experience up there. (Laughter)

Haas:

That is where the Navy sends their men to sea.

Bell:

And Herbert.

H.M.Jr:

Sure. Come on, children.

Schwarz:

Here are the stories on the Government bond

market this morning. Since you have already
read Kintner and Alsop-H.M.Jr:

Right.

Schwarz:

The District WPA, the Writers' Project, has
done a book for junior high school children

about Government departments in the District.

of six services they picked the Treasury as
one and we supplied some of the material.
Now they are asking if you would write a

foreword for it. They have suggested a draft
which, if you are willing, Ferdie and I could
edit.

H.M.Jr:

PWA?

245
- 18 Schwarz:

WPA Project. It is sold by private publishers
but
royalties
come back and help keep
the the
Project
solvent.
H.M.Jr:
Schwarz:

H.M.Jr:

I have never done it.

The angle that it is a private-Private?

Schwarz:

H.M.Jr:

Private publisher. It is sold by Funk.
What do you think, Herbert?

Gaston:

back-I don't
Schwarz:

think so. Just the royalties coming

The publisher still makes a profit.

Gaston:

It
is aso.
money-making venture, and I don't
think
H.M.Jr:

Out.

Kuhn:

It was done by the state governors on the
WPA guides, which were private projects, but
the state government was the only one. I

have never seen it done otherwise.
Schwarz:

We don't do a lot of things that governors
do. I think the whole group might want to
know-H.M.Jr:

Look at Pehle's expression.

Schwarz:

The whole group might want to know about

the formation of a - finally, of a youth

group supporting the Administration foreign
policy. The have been sending you some of
their publications. Mrs. Roosevelt seems
to become interested in them.

246

- 19 They are called the Student Defenders of
Democracy.
Somebody might mention they sent
you
that publication.
H.M.Jr:

All right. Is that all?

Schwarz:

Yes.

White:

I have nothing.

Graves:

I spent a little time at Olin Dow's since

Monday. He has been in to see me three times.

He is not going to be able to take the post
that you had in mind for him, but he is
entirely willing to come here from time to
time to give us his advice--

H.M.Jr:

Good.

Graves:

.... and suggestions, and he has already left

some suggestions with me about people that
he might do business with. He was exceedingly

nice. But he feels that he can't do it.

H.M.Jr:

Get everything you can out of him, you see.

He is painting that thing.
Graves:

That is right. I thought it was Hyde Park.

H.M.Jr:

Is it? I don't know. Well, get what you can
out of him.

Graves:

Yes. That is right.

H.M.Jr:

Are you going to show me any more posters

before I go? Four o'clock is a good time.

Graves:

Well, I don't think it is necessary to show
you any more posters because yesterday we

had the artists' submissions on posters that

we had asked for at the same time we asked

247
- 20 -

the Bureau for its suggestions, and we all

decided that the Bureau poster was better
than any other thing that had been submitted,

so we turned that back to Mr. Hall to do a
model in greater detail, so we have nothing
for you to see about posters, but we can
tell you that we are going ahead on the
basis of the poster which we showed you be-

fore. And, incidentally, one of the things
that we are doing is to try to work all of
our printing business, including posters

and stamp albums and that sort of thing,
through the Government Printing Office in-

stead of by private contractors, turning

this poster over. We have made an arrangement under which the Public Printer is going

to assign one of his staff half time to work
with us on all of our publications, which
is going to be a great help to us because

we are in difficulty with paper shortage
and things of that kind, all of which the

Public Printer is in a better position to
take care of than we are.

H.M.Jr:

Good.

All right?
Graves:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

I wish - I don't think I will get time. I

read a very good report by Elmer Irey on
Nucky Johnson of Atlantic City, and what he

needs now is to be sure the thing is tried
before a good judge and he thinks it ought

to be one outside of the State of New Jersey.
When you boil the whole thing down, that is
what I get out of it. Elmer is under you,
isn't he?
Gaston:

Not as to his tax cases, only as to the

248
- 21 coordination.
H.M.Jr:

Anyway, send for him and talk to him about

it. If you and he feel, after talking about
it, that you want five minutes with me, I
would be glad to give it to you, and it is
a case I am particularly interested in, you
see. I will have five minutes this after-

noon. I don't know just who all gets in on
that, but I want to make sure that he gets
a good judge.

Gaston:

Well, Ed can probably give us some help if
necessary.

H.M.Jr:

Well, whoever can, but if you see him and
Elmer feels he still wants to see me, around

five o'clock.

Gaston:

Sometime this afternoon?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. But it is a case I am very much interested in, and I want to be sure that he
gets all the backing. I don't know whether
it has been brought to Ed's attention or
not.

Foley:

I know about it.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I want to make it a case that - everything that we can do to help him. Make
sure that he gets a good trial and a good

United States District Attorney. There are
so many people interested in it. If he can

get a conviction there, it will be a re-

freshing thing for me. Elmer has been on
it three years, I guess. Would you?
Gaston:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Are you through?

249

- 22 Graves:

Through.

H.M.Jr:

Bell?

Bell:

In view of our consideration of the financing
at a two and a half percent rate, Mr. Haas
and Murphy have gone over our rates on the

savings bonds, and they think that we will

probably be better off if we raised that

two and four-tenths to about two and a half
and worked out schedules along that line.

It is really only raising it one-tenth of
one percent, and I think it is a pretty
good thing to do.

H.M.Jr:

Do you recommend it?

Bell:

Yes, I do.

H.M.Jr:

Accepted.

Bell:

Our schedules are all completed, and we can

go right ahead today on it.

H.M.Jr:

They haven't already put it on the face of the

bonds?

Bell:

No, I have approved it, but they are just in
an approved form so they can readily be changed.

H.M.Jr:

Bell:

All right.
You remember we asked the Secretary of War

and the Secretary of the Navy - or Secretary

of Commerce, the Federal Loan Administrator,

to give us information as to what they are
doing with respect to taking over contracts
from the British and putting them under the
Lease-Lend. I just have a letter from the

Secretary of War, and he says that the amount

involved in their taking over contracts is

250
- 23 about 230 million, and that Jesse is considering a hundred and ninety-seven million

but we will get the details from him. That

makes a total of 427 million 560 thousand

which is under consideration. I will give
Phil Young a copy of that.

H.M.Jr:

Well, and Harry White and Merle Cochran and
Foley.

Cochran:

We could use that in today's meeting.

Bell:

Will it come up today?

Cochran:

Oh, yes, that is the main thing.

White:

Oh, there is no hurry about that, you know.

H.M.Jr:

Anything else?

Bell:

I was to remind you that you should talk to

Glass.
H.M.Jr:

The second we are through, I am calling up.

Bell:

I have a memorandum here for your files on
the Harold Smith question which I thought

ought to go into the record.

H.M.Jr:

Good.

White:

They called up again yesterday, Dan, and the
committee wanted to know again what our

appropriations for war were with respect to

the British. They weren't satisfied with
the answer. I explained them again, so they
will be satisfied with what the British Empire spent as compared with what we have

spent. Your office is furnishing what we

have spent, and we are furnishing what the

British have spent. I will sand it up to

251
- 24 them this morning.
Bell:

There has been some correspondence between
the President and Congressman Downs with

respect to furnishing additional relief to
Finland, and the last letter that he got the President got from Congressman Downs,
he referred it jointly to you.
H.M.Jr:

You know they did it yesterday.

Bell:

Yes, and the Secretary of State for preparation of a reply, and we have been working
on a reply, but in view of what was done
yesterday, the reply was changed just to
say, "With reference to your letter of February 18 regarding extension of further

credit to Finland, I take pleasure in inform-

ing you that the Export-Import Bank of Washington has opened an additional credit to

Finland in the amount of five million."
That is the draft of the reply, and the
Secretary of State wants to say to the Presi-

dent in his memorandum, "that I am advised

that the Secretary of the Treasury concurs

in submitting this draft." I will initial
that.
H.M.Jr:

All right. Who knew before the Export-Import
Bank made that five million loan? Did anybody
in the Treasury know?

White:

did'nt know. I was informed that there was
going to be a meeting yesterday noon. As a

I

result of coincidence, I didn't attend, but

in any case I didn't know ahead of time what
they were going to take up. I have spoken

twice about being - I asked if it wasn't

possible to be forewarned as to what is being
taken up. Jones stated that it would be

possible, but I haven't heard about it.

252

- 25 H.M.Jr:

For instance, he was here yesterday after-

noon, and he said, "We had an executive committee
meeting of the Export-Import Bank and

decided to do the five million dollars."

I am perfectly willing, if you will write
a letter, I will sign it, and simply say
that if my representative - the Treasury

representative can not be advised in advance

of an important transaction like this, I

would feel it would be much better if the
Treasury were not represented. Think it

Bell:White:

over. Talk it over with Bell, will you?
Because I mean he is very high-handed, to
put it moderately, understate it. Dan?
That is all I have.
The Treasury did not approve that loan,

didn't vote.
H.M.Jr:

Well, I think it would be much better if we
just didn't have representation.

Cochran:

Doesn't the law require a representative from
the Treasury Department?

H.M.Jr:

Well, we can get the law changed. I don't
know. We can get it changed.

Foley:

A corporation was set up under the District
of Columbia laws. It is a regular banking
corporation.

H.M.Jr:
Cochran:

Well, we can resign and leave it vacant.
But Procopé had come in and talked about his

desire for a loan.
H.M.Jr:

Well, Jesse is very high-handed.

253
- 26 Thompson:

The President yesterday signed an Executive

order that will permit the General Counsel
to become the Acting Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

Wonderful. That means that Mr. Bell can

go away, Mr. Sullivan can go away - wonder-

ful. That means that every Saturday you
fellows can go and play golf.
Sullivan:

And Ed doesn't play.

Gaston:

On a certain contingency.

H.M.Jr:

That is what I mean.

Sullivan:

That is what I wanted him to get.

Gaston:

That is wonderful. Now, beyond this point,

you get every other Saturday, and you fellows
used to get every fifth Saturday? How does
that work?

H.M.Jr:

Ed is here every other Saturday, and we are
here every fourth Saturday. (Laughter)

Schwarz:

Fair enough.

Sullivan:

That is a better deal than you made last summer.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I am glad you brought it up, because I
just wanted to say, I don't know whether it

is four or five weeks or four or five years
that I have been here since my last trip to

Arizona, and everybody here has been per-

fectly grand in helping me through one of
the most difficult periods we have been
through, the Lease-Lend, two financings. I

don't expect to call up. If I do, it will

only be because you people ask me something.

So I would like everybody to take it easy
for the next two weeks. We have all been

254

- 27 -

through some very, very difficult times.

But I think we have help up our own end.

I say unless I get calls, I will not be
calling, so the callee will have to be in
the Treasury.

Thompson:

Mr. Bell and Mr. Foley and I want to speak
to you about two promotions.

H.M.Jr:

Bell and Foley and you? Well, I have already
been talked to about this. Is anybody
against it?

Thompson:

We can't legally promote Mr. Cox on his
present payroll or on the General Counsel's
roll, so we could put him on Foreign Funds
temporarily.

H.M.Jr:

No. What about Kades?

Thompson:

The only alternative would be to wait until

we get an administrative expense account
under the Lend-Lease administration.

H.M.Jr:

What about Kades.

Thompson:

Kades is all right, but there is a technical
question involved. The General Counsel advises me that it is O.K., but the Comptroller
General might raisea question on it.

Foley:

No, I don't think so.

H.M.Jr:

Do you want to do the one without the other?
Wouldn't that be bad medicine?

Foley:

Well, let's do Kades and then we can do the
other one when we get some money.

Bell:

We ought to get an allotment under the LeaseLend pretty soon.

255
- 28 Foley:

You see, that won't affect him.

H.M.Jr:

Klotz:

But why do Kades - wouldn't it raise a question in Cox's mind, why Kades and not himself?
Well, you can tell him.

Foley:

We tried to.

H.M.Jr:

Tried to what?

Foley:

Do him too.

H.M.Jr:

Will you tell him that?

Foley:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Well, why do you jump Kades a thousand? Why

not five hundred?

Foley:
H.M.Jr:

Because Huntington and Bernie are getting

nine and I think he is entitled to it.
All right.
Anything else?

Thompson:

I have a letter written on the Cadillac, but
I haven't gotten an answer yet.

H.M.Jr:

Before I do it, I want to see one. I want to

make sure that the ceilings are high and the
windows are big, because this car has got it is exceptionally roomy. Maybe I can look
at McReynolds' or somebody's, because he has

a new one.
Thompson:

I think he has the same as yours.

H.M.Jr:

No, the chauffeur said he just got another one.

256

- 29 Sullivan:

Are we going to see Mr. . Doughton today?

H.M.Jr:

No, I am through with Doughton.

3/19/41

257

At 9:30 meeting today Mr. Graves reported to

the Secretary that he had talked with Olin
DO, and that it would be impossible for Mr.
Dows to take full charge of the Treasury's
art work but that he would be glad to give
the Department any advice and assistance he

could. HM Jr said this was all right and told

Mr. Graves he should use him as much as possible.

258

March 7, 1941
Harold Graves

Secretary Morgenthau

Please talk to me today about Olin Bows, the
artist who lives at Rhinebook, New York. Both Mrs.
Morgenthan and I think he would be tops, and I want

to personally get in touch with him, and ask him to

came down and take full charge of our art work.

Olin Dows used to work under Ned Bruce and was part

of that organisation. It was Mrs. Morgenthan's suggestion, and we could look for years and could not
find a finer young man than Olin Dows.

259

March 10, 1941.

MEMORANDUM FOR MISS CHAUNCEY:

Re: The Secretary's memorandum of March 7 to
Mr. Graves about Olin Dows.

Mr. Graves called Mr. Dows at his home at Rhinebeck,
N. Y., on Friday, March 7, and succeeded in reaching him
at about 3:00 p.m.
Mr. Dows stated that he had to come to Washington
on March 17, and that he very much did not want to make

two trips. After some persuasion on Mr. Graves' part,

he consented to come to Washington on Monday, March 10,

as the Secretary had indicated to Mr. Graves he wished,

if the Secretary wouldn't let him postpone his trip
until the following week.
Mr. Graves spoke to the Secretary following the
showing of the motion picture on Saturday, March 8,

and Mr. Morgenthau consented to the postponement of

Mr. Dows trip until March 17.

Mr. Graves wired Mr. Dows accordingly on Saturday,

March 8. A copy of the telegram is attached.
MFF

260
EXPEDITE
DARD FORM No. 14A

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON

MOVED BY THE PRESIDENT
MARCH 10. 1926

TELEGRAM
OFFICIAL BUSINESS - GOVERNMENT RATES

CHARGE TREASURY DEPARTMENT. APPROPRIATION FOR

Expenses of loans
(The appropriation from which payable must be stated on above line)

- PERFORM -

KIN

March 8, 1941.

0lin Dows,

Rhinebeck, N. Y.

It will be satisfactory to Mr. Morgenthau for you to come

in Monday, March seventeen. Would appreciate your phoning me that
day.

Harold N. Graves

Assistant to the Secretary.

261

Lunch
CONFIDENTIAL

March 19, 1941

To:

The Secretary

From:

Mr. Young

Re: Conference with Lt. Rademes Gaxiola

On March 17th, the Vice President called me to say that
he was greatly interested in seeing what could be done for
Lt. Gaxiola who wanted to purchase some planes for the Mexican
Air Force. Evidently the Vice President had spoken to the
President about the matter, and, although Lt. Gaxiola wished
to purchase a large quantity under the provisions of the LendLease Act, the President's reaction was that ten or twelve
trainers might be made available.
Mr. Wallace went on to say that the Mexican Air Force now
had four planes and that those were obsolete. Further, the
Vice President advised me that the President had suggested that

Lt. Gaxiola talk with the Chief of Staff. I told Mr. Wallace
that I would get in touch with Lt. Gaxiola immediately and do
what I could to help.

I called Lt. Gaxiola at the Roosevelt Hotel, and he came
in to see me the same afternoon. He told me that the Mexican
Air Force now had four planes in service which were of the
light attack and observation type. These planes were of 1930
vintage and insufficient to accommodate the 175 pilots already
in the Mexican Air Force. In addition to these four planes,
Mexico had six trainers.
Lt. Gaxiola wanted to purchase from 150 to 300 assorted
planes, of which about ten percent would be trainers, and the
rest, attack, observation, and pursuit ships. He was considering
the 950 horsepower class of either North American or Vultee

attack and observation ships, the Curtiss P-36 for a pursuit
ship, and the Fairchild or Harlow for trainers.

262

-2I told the Lieutenant that, of course, the aircraft situation was very tight and it would be very difficult to get any

planes to say nothing of the quantity which he desired. He
replied that Mexico would be perfectly willing to take delayed
delivery, that is, six or seven planes a month for an extended
period rather than all of them at once.

I explained to Lt. Gaxiola that there was a joint aircraft

committee, under the chairmanship of General Arnold, which allocated production capacity and deliveries, and that it would be
necessary to put in a request with this committee before any

action could be taken. I added that I thought there might be
some possibility of getting a few trainers, but that I was very
doubtful about the attack or pursuit ships due to the scarcity

of engines.

I inquired as to the status of the old Bellance planes in

Mexico, which had served as the basis for so many fantastic
stories, with the thought in mind that perhaps the old engines
could be made available if new frames could be procured. I
gathered, however, that this idea was not feasible, and I subsequently heard from a different source that those engines had
been sold to Canada.

I told Lt. Gaxiola that I would make an appointment for him
to see the Chief of Staff and General Arnold. Gaxiola said that
he already knew General Arnold and had been talking with him
about the plane which Gaxiola had flown from Mexico demonstrating
the use of butane as fuel.

After Lt. Gaxiola's departure, I called the War Department
and found that General Marshall was out of the city on an inspection trip, so I made an appointment for Lt. Gaxiola to see
General Arnold yesterday (March 18th). In talking with General
Arnold over the telephone, he advised me that he knew Gaxiola
and that I knew as well as the General did that it would be very
difficult for planes to be made available for the Mexican Air
Force, however, Arnold said he would talk with Gaxiola about it.

I have had no report or indication as to the result of this con-

ference.

In connection with the foregoing, it might be possible for
Mexico to secure a few CW-22's, a two-place observation and light

attack ship manufactured by Curtiss Wright at its St. Louis plant.
An arrangement is just being worked out now by the joint aircraft
committee whereby about 100 of these CW-22's will be manufactured

over and above orders existing on the books for delivery some time
in the late summer and fall. This is the type of ship which Mexico
would like to have and for which there is no great demand in the U.S.
defense program. Presunably. part of these CW-22's will be allocated
to the Netherlands East Indies.

Py

263

March 19, 1941

10:18 a.a.

H.M.Jr:

Allan

Hello,

Sproul:

Hello, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

Who is this?

S:

This is Allan Sproul and Bob Rouse is

right here with me. He can tell you what

has been going on.
H.M.Jr:
Rouse:

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

Right.

There was a little early talk among the

brokers around 101 and as soon as the
real market developed - developed around
9:11 and 10:12 - and the general reception
has been excellent.
Good.

There is some trading out of the taxable
2's and other surrounding issues with a
view of going into the new bonds, but 80
far they are holding very well as far as
price is concerned, the 2's being about
par . 31 to 101.1. So, so far, I think we
can be very well pleased.

Tell me, has the last 2, has that sold off
any.

R:

Oh, I don't think there 18 any change there.
Nobody has paid any attention to them this
morning.

H.M.Jr:
R:

I see.

(Talks aside). You mean the last two bonds
or the 2'8 of 48-50.

H.M.Jr:

The 2's of 48-50.

R:

They are 31 to 101.1 and there is some

selling of those with the idea of buying
the new 21's.

264
-2H.M.Jr:
R:

Well, that would be expected.
But the market is in good shape. One
dealer reported he had more rights than
he could handle but by and large they're

H.M.Jr:

not seeing very much selling of rights.
Well, that was the First Boston, wasn't

R:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:
R:

it?

I hear they were spreading the gloom

particularly.

Well, from things we heard we thought so,

but in talking with the man who is alleged
to have been doing it this morning, he
denied it completely. He said he had a
joke with another fellow in another

H.M.Jr:
R:

H.M.Jr:

trading house.
That's Lanston.

Yeah, but that apparently wasn't so.
Well, now, you won't help out the First
Boston, will you, by relieving them of any

of their rights?

B:

No, we're not doing anything of that sort,
but I think they are playing the game,
Mr. Secretary, as far as. the public is
concerned.

H.M.Jr:
S:

H.M.Jr:

Well, I'd watch them.

They talk frankly to us but I know they
are trying to do a constructive job.
Well, I mean, I don't want to bail them
out.

S:

Right.

H.M.Jr:

Some other people have come in and been

helpful, but I don't think the First

Boston has been helpful. I mean, before you

do anything, I'd like you to talk to me.

will you?

265
3S:

H.M.Jr:

Yeah.

I don't like the way Pope talked when he

was down here.

S:

Uh-huh.

H.M.Jr:

I mean he was kind of ugly.

S:

Really?

H.M.Jr:

Oh, yeah.

S:

Yeah, I am surprised.

H.M.Jr:

No, I didn't like - that's just between us.

S:

Yeah, I understand.

H.M.Jr:

S:

I didn't like the way he talked. I mean,
I don't have grudges - I can't afford to but I just thought before you did anything I mean if you got soft-hearted, I'd like
you to talk to me. All right?
Well, 80 far, as far as any subscriptions
and 80 on, they'11 get treated just like
anybody else.

H.M.Jr:
S:

Well, that's all that I'd care about.
As far as outstanding jobs that have been
done, Devine did an outstanding job on the
2's.

H.M.Jr:

I know he did.

S:

He carried a real load there and did a

H.M.Jr:

swell job.
I know he did.

S:

Fine.

H.M.Jr:

But the thing has got off to a good start.

S:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you so much.

R. & S.:

Fine.

266
March 19, 1941
10:29 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Mr. Bell.

H.M.Jr:

Yes, Dan.

D. W. Bell:

Sir Frederick would like to know if he

could have five minutes alone with you

at the beginning of the meeting this

morning?
H.M.Jr:

Yeah. Well, the others will just have

B:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:
D:

to wait.

We'll start at five minutes of 11:00
No, he didn't mean that. He meant just to
come in at the regular time, but if you'd
just see him for five minutes.

H.M.Jr:

I'll do that. Alone.

B;

Alone, yes.

H.M.Jr:

I'll do that.

B:

Thank you.

267

March 19, 1941
11:03 a.m.

RE AID TO CANADA

Present:

Mr. Foley

Mr. Bell

Mr. Cochran
Mr. White

H.M.Jr:

We started in yesterday morning. In the
first place, they called a meeting Monday
over at Federal Reserve, and they tie everybody up just to listen to an annual report,
so that the men that are my eyes and ears
in New York have got to be down here to listen
to the Open Market Committee. That was
number one. And then when we started yesterday morning, everybody practically put the

Pressure on. We couldn't sell 500 million

dollars of bonds for cash at any price. Is
that right? And I kidded the fellows in New

York and said, "Take some vitamin pills, I

am going to do it." Is that right? I am

not exaggerating, am I?
Bell:

No.

H.M.Jr:

And they tried every way they could to say,
"Make it 300 million of the bond and 200

million of the note." Is that the way they
wanted it?

Bell:

Yes.

268

-2-

H.M.Jr:

And I said, "Well, the United States Govern-

ment can sell it.

Then when we came around after lunch, they

wanted me to go out a year further, and I

wouldn't do it. I said, "If in the morning
you can't sell it at any price, in the

afternoon you switch and say, 'It is too
sweet, it ought to be further- 1" and I have
never gotten more conflicting advice. And
the First of Boston was all over the street
telling their customers the bond is no good,
and it is going down to a hundred at least
so don't do anything, and they are just sitting there loaded with rights. But I mean,
you just can't

Bell:

You say they deny it?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. You just can't believe it. The thing

that Dan and I went through the last couple
of days, there wasn't any of the New York
crowd until we started to go to the fellows
that had the money, and the fellow out in
Chicago said, "I don't know whether I can

take it, but I will take the whole issue."
And as soon as you got out to Chicago, you
get a different atmosphere. I really, when
I come back, would like to sit down with

that SEC crowd. There must be something

that they can do legally and properly in

the handling of the New York financial crowd.

There must be some way to do something that

these fellows are not all the time - all the

time this beating them over the head. We
are going to have to get an awful lot of
money and so is private industry, and I
have never, never seen the fellows so licked,
have you?

269

-3Bell:

They are awfully blue.

H.M.Jr:

And there hasn't been a private issue for

new money that has been a success, I think,

this year. Maybe a little, but not much.

Bell:

Not a big one.

H.M.Jr:

There hasn't been a big one. I don't blame

it altogether - but I blame it in the sense
of their doing nothing on the affirmative
side to cheer the fellows up. In a perfectly legal, proper, equitable way, go

ahead and do some business.
Bell:

I don't think this competitive business is
right.

H.M.Jr:

That I don't know, but there is something
definitely wrong, Dan, when you have got to
go through what we have the last two days

on our own issues. I think it is worth
exploring. I don't know what is the matter.

Bell:

Competitive bidding may be all right under
limited control, but I think the company
that sells an issue to an underwriting
group ought to be interested in the success
of that from their own company's credit

standpoint. Instead of that, they go out
and they sell it to the highest bidder, and
then it is a drug on the market and it
doesn't hurt the people who are underwrit-

ing it, it hurts the credit of the company,

and many a company has had their credit

hurt by this process.
H.M.Jr:

All I know is what is the condition and the
amount of money that is needed, and it isn't

270

-4that - I am facing a great success day, so

I am all right, but it knocked the hell out
of me to do it. Dan was sick as a dog

Monday. You fellows get around and - you
know them over there. Sit around and gossip

with them a little while I am gone and,

what is the matter with the New York crowd,
what are you doing? You know, Harry and Ed,
you know them all over there. What is the

trouble, fellows? I mean, where is the

fault? Is it our fault or is it their fault?
Would you do that?
Foley:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Because it is very important, also, who they
put in as chairman of the SEC and what his

attitude is going to be. I needn't explain

to you people - I mean, I don't want anything done, no lessening of the regulations,

but it is just on state of mind. It is

like I call them up yesterday and I say,
"You fellows are deficient in vitamins.
Go out and take some vitamin pills." They

call me back and say, "We have had our vita-

mins, and we think we can do it." Isn't
that what they said?

Bell:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

I mean, you kid them and cajole them and

slap them on the back. I don't give up one
inch as to what we are fighting for.

White:

Instead of them advising you, you are advising
them.

H.M.Jr:

Seriously, Harry, I told the Federal in New
York, I said, Go out and - you are deficient
in vitamins. They called back, "Hello, we

271

-5have had our vitamins. We think we can do

it." Now, what happens? Nothing. It is
just a cheery word, a little kidding, a
little joking. I have got confidence. They

think it over and they get it. That is all.

Have I given up anything? Nothing except

my physical energy. If I sat here and said,
"It can't be done, and I gave in and said,

"I can't sell 500 million - " I haven't given

up anything with the New Deal, that is what
I mean, you see, and I just wondered if SEC
couldn't do the same thing, without giving

up anything. But I just suspect there is
something - and the facts are, you can't

sell a new issue today at a fair rate. Now,
there is something wrong. And I think if

you - you fellows could very well spend a
couple of days gossiping and having lunch

or supper with them and just talking with
them. Don't you think so, Dan?
Bell:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Because you don't know these fellows intimately and they do. Do you?

Bell:

No.

H.M.Jr:

They do.

All right, gents.
Cochran:

The Canadians left a number of documents

here. I have distributed them to the group.

They haven't had much chance to look at them

yet, and I wrote just a little memo as to

what I thought they were going to talk about.
They are going to raise this question of
the Canadian's selling their securities here
and Clark said they could send someone down

272
-6to New York thoroughly competent to take
charge, I mean someone from the Minister
of Finance or the Bank of Canada, and that

they would like to coordinate with the
British so that Gifford's sales wouldn't
be slowed up or the market wouldn't be
beared down. And they have recalculated

their American securities, which they place

at 276 million dollars. So that is that
point.

Bell:

What was it before, Merle?

Cochran:

Three hundred and fifty. That was 350,

Canadian, incidentally. This is 276, U.
S. . Then they are going to bring up this
same question--

H.M.Jr:

What is the Canadian dollar worth, 82 cents?

Bell:

It is about 89, isn't it?
It is 87, I think.

White:
Cochran:

And then they are going to bring up this
question as to whether the Lease-Lend Bill
or Act is applicable in the case of these
parts which are manufactured in the United
States and sent to Canada to be put in
munitions exports to Great Britain.

Bell:

It is no longer Treasury Department business.

H.M.Jr:

No, and the British Government should take

that up. If the British Government wants to

get some engines here and put them into

planes, it is up to the British Government,
and that is up to Purvis.
Foley:

That is right.

273

-7Bell:

And Hopkins.

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Cochran:

Then the question of what contracts can be

taken over - that is, existing contracts

under the Lease-Lend. They will have that
same thing.

H.M.Jr:

That is all right.

Cochran:

And they have had no information from Mr.
Jones or from the Army and Navy since they

submitted their last report to us, and that

meant they didn't know anything that was
going to be done. So those are the main

points, and then also this question as to

whether - Phillips will raise the point as

to what assistance they can give Canada. We
have almost excluded their sending any gold

up. Clark says that he doesn't need the
gold, but he does need dollar proceeds of
gold.
H.M.Jr:

All right.

Cochran:

And they raised the same point, that in the

data which we submitted to the Congressional

committees there was envisaged some payment

of dollars or gold to third countries, including Canada. That is that.

Bell:

What was that figure, Harry?

White:

Six hundred twenty million.

Cochran:

Then the point that Phillips wants to see
you about, I just now learned from Pinsent,

they are unhappy about some of the statements
made by Mr. Smith.

274

- .8 H.M.Jr:

Now, I think I had better see them.

White:

If they don't like Smith's testimony now -

ifis they
had seen it as it was originally, it
pretty good now.
Bell:

It is going to be worse when it is before
the Senate.

H.M.Jr:

He asked to see me five minutes alone.

Cochran:

The only other thing was this letter on the

Army contracts.
H.M.Jr:

I promise you, knowing this man, it will not
be more than five minutes, so if you will
wait in Bell's room.

275

March 19, 1941
11:14 a.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Senator Barkley.

H.M.Jr:

Hello, Alben.

Sen. Alben
Barkley:

Yeah.

H.M.Jr:

Henry. How are you?

B:

Fine.

H.M.Jr:

Alben, I'm going up on the Hill today to
have lunch with Henry Wallace and I
wondered if after that Bell, Foley and I

could see you and possibly Senator Glass
and Senator Adams for a few minutes,
because I'm leaving town tomorrow night,
and I wanted to have an understanding with

you on information that you might want in

connection with the $7 billion bill, you

see, as far as the Treasury is concerned.

B:

Yeah. Well, what time 16 your lunch with
Henry?

H.M.Jr:

Well, I'll be available at 2:00.

B:

Well, that's all right. I've got to go

H.M.Jr:

Yeah. Well, I can be there at sharp 2:00.

B:

Well, where will you want to meet?

H.M.Jr:

That's your pleasure.

B:

Well, meet somewhere over in the Capitol.

H.M.Jr:

Well, you name it. I don't know where

B:

Wallace, I guess, would be - we're not in

before the Agriculture Committee - I mean
the Appropriations Committee on Agriculture
at 2:30.

Wallace

session today.

276
2H.M.Jr:
B:

H.M.Jr:
B:

Yeah,
I don't know where Wallace would
meet.

Where areyou going to eat with him?
He hasn't told me.

Oh. Well, it it's over at the Capitol

why that's the best place to meet. In
his office or meet in mine which is right

next - my Library Committee, which is
right next to the Appropriations Committee.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I'll be there at 2:00 that's all.

B:

Well, suppose you come - it won't be any

inconvenience for Adams and Glass to come

into - just right next door - my office

there in the Library Committee and Henry
can come there too.

H.M.Jr:
B:

Right. Two o'clock at the Library
Committee.

That's right. It's on the ground floor
right in the corner, right beside the

Appropriations Committee.
H.M.Jr:
B:

Right.

Opposite the Committee on Education and

Labor.

H.M.Jr:

Good. Glass and Adams are the right

B:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Adams, I think, is sort of Sub-Chairman,
isn't he?

fellows to have there, aren't they?

B:

He's Subcommittee Chairman but I don't

H.M.Jr:

bill.
Well, let's leave it this way. I do want

think he's very enthusiastic about this

to see you and Glass and you invite anybody

else

277

-3B:

Well, suppose you get - I think, Adams

and Byrnes, because they are on the Subcommittee, and if Adams is going to handle

H.M.Jr:

the bill, of course he ought to be present.
Well, will you decide that?

B:

All right.

H.M.Jr:

And you' 11 have them there?

B:

H.M.Jr:
B:

All right.
And I'll be there at 2 o'clock.
All right.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

B:

Good-bye.

278

March 19, 1941
11:28 a.m.

RE AID TO CANADA

Present:

Mr. Coynes

Mr. Clark
Mr. Wrong

Mr. Playfair

Mr. Pinsent

Mr. Phillips
Mr. Bell

Mr. Cochran
Mr. White

Mr. Foley
H.M.Jr:

Do you mind, Sir Frederick, if I clear up the
thing of the testimony, first.

Phillips:

No.

H.M.Jr:

In this thing of the testimony of Mr. Smith,
it is not correct, according to my understanding with the President of the United States.
The understanding which we had, which I went
over with him Monday a week ago, was that we

looked to the British government to pay for
all outstanding contracts from the proceeds

of the sale of their listed securities, which
as of the first of January, was six hundred

million. Their direct investments as of the
first of January were nine hundred million,

and their proceeds from South Africa and

Australia in gold were four hundred million,

or a total of a billion nine. Is my addition
correct?

Bell:

Something like that, I think.

279

-2-

Cochran:

H.M.Jr:

Well, the gold production went up to 555.

Is that what it was? Less - now, this is

where the testimony is incorrect - less what
the Army and the R.F.C. would take over of

contracts which, according to their letter

now is how much, Dan?
Bell:
H.M.Jr:
Cochran:

Well, potentially four hundred million.
Let's say between three and four hundred

million.

I think that is a little high, because that

includes some contracts for which the British

are not yet committed.
H.M.Jr:

Let's put it this way. Less what the Army

and the R.F.C. could take over, the Army
taking over the contracts where you have a
down payment on the order, and the R.F.C.
taking over those contracts where you had

investment in plants. Is that correct? Well

anyway, that is my understanding with the
President.

Bell:

Yes, but that wasn't your testimony before the

H.M.Jr:

As of the first of January. But this is my

committee.

understanding with the President.
Bell:

Well, I think that is all right, but I don't

think you said that before the committee, and
I think if you make that statement before this
Appropriations Committee, you will get into

difficulties.

H.M.Jr:

I am not. I am telling Sir Frederick what my
understanding is with the President.

280
3-

Bell:

That is all right.

H.M.Jr:

I am telling him what my understanding with

the President was and is and still is, and

there has been no change in my understanding

with the President, and my understanding is

that there would be no change unless some
circumstance arose, and then we would discuss

it again, but I want him to be able to tell
this to his government, but the reason we

can't testify on this thing is because I made

the statement that the British government had

practically stopped placing orders, and if I
tell them all of this, then I have got to show
that you people have been placing about 35

million in orders a week, which is not stopping,
and my neck would be out so far it might
wobble off.

Phillips:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

But there is no misunderstanding as to what I what my understanding is with the President.
It is purely between the President and myself,
and I have told Mr. Hopkins what it is, so he
understands. Just another word on it. My
understanding with the President is that I am
solely responsible to him and nobody else for

the liquidation of your contracts up to the
15th of March, and from then on Mr. Hopkins

takes over on anything that you purchase. This
may or may not interest Canada, but it interests

England a great deal. As I say, I can't say
it publicly, because I just don't want to get

into this whole explanation of why you people

have been placing around 35 million a week.

Phillips:

It is a pity you couldn't have said some such
chrase like program orders. Of course, the
truth was we haven't placed any new program

orders, but there were things like iron and

281

-

steel and machine tools which are in a continuous progress which we can't obviously
discontinue.

H.M.Jr:

When I made the statement, I really believed
that all orders would come to a stop.

Phillips:

I think we should have been out of the war by
now, or pretty soon, if we had stopped steel
or machine tools.

H.M.Jr:

Well, I risked my job by okaying them every

day, but I thought it was worth while. I

have no regrets, but it would be damn diffi-

cult to go up and explain it on the Hill.

I

want you to know we are going to have a

private meeting this afternoon with the Vice-

President and Senator Barkley and Senator
Glass and Senator Adams, and I am going to ex-

plain the thing to them and also tell them I
am leaving town tomorrow night for two weeks,
not because I don't want to testify, but I
want - the brain cells have to be allowed to
re-multiply again. But these gentlemen will
know what the situation is. So don't worry
too much what the Budget Director says.

Phillips:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Now I am at your service.

Clark:

Well, Mr. Secretary, you will remember that when
I was down here a couple of weeks ago, I promised to go back and have a complete revision

of our statistics both in regard to our internal
situation and our balance of payments with you
and with U.K., and that I would get those back

to you, your officials, as soon as possible.

Now, we took them down yesterday and prepared

copies to Mr. Cochran, and they are perhaps a

bit technical, but Mr. Coynes will remain here

282

-5as financial attache for us and will be
ready to discuss them with your officials
at any time if there are any points that
are not fully clear. The reason for the
revisions in our statements are, first, the
considerable expansion of our own war program

for the new fiscal year, which begins in a

couple of weeks; and secondly, the much higher

estimates placed on the deficit of United
Kingdom with Canada. Perhaps I might just
mention one or two points - one or two of the
high spots in these figures after a very
careful examination of the British-Canadian
figures.

We placed the - we estimate the deficit of

United Kingdom with Canada for the coming fiscal

year at a billion one hundred twenty-five
million dollars. The make-up of that is here
in detail. During the next six months that
will be 561 million dollars. Now, I present
in another table what the British deficit has

been since the beginning of the war with Canada,
and I have shown in the table here how that

has been met by various periods. Briefly, if

you take the period from the beginning of the
war, or rather the beginning of exchange con-

trol, which is the basis of our figures, to
the end of February last, you will find that

we have financed the deficit by repatriation
of securities to approximately 45 per cent of
the total, by the accumulation of sterling
balances to the extent of 21 per cent of the
total, and the balance of 34 per cent has been
financed by the sale of gold - by the transfer
of gold to Canada by the United Kingdom.

The trends over the period, I think, are rather

interesting. I think I called your atten-

tion during the last meeting to the fact that
in the last three months it has been - the

283

-6-

deficit has been met almost wholly by
accumulation of sterling balances or repatriation, by accumulation of sterling balances.
In other words, we haven't had any gold from
the United Kingdom since the early part of
December. Then we have made a complete re-

vision of our deficit - of our balance of pay-

ments with the United States, and taking into
account current and capital items, perhaps

allowing a little generous estimate of tourist

receipts during this coming year, we are hoping
for a pretty considerable increase as compared

with last year. Our net deficit there in the
twelve months - in the twelve months from

April 1, we figure at 478 millions of dollars.
That is higher than the first estimate I gave
you last December, and it results partly from

our own expanded war program and partly from
the larger estimate of United Kingdom purchases

in Canada. I also --

H.M.Jr:

Clark:

H.M.Jr:

Excuse me. You didn't mind what I said to the
Press the other day. You see, Monday there
was a story in our papers coming out of London,
England, and I thought it was just as - I mean,
the only thing I could say was that the last
time I had seen you, you said you were all right,
and I thought it was much better to say it that

way than to hesitate about it. It is time to
tell them when you are not all right, isn't it?
I think that is quite all right, Mr. Secretary.
You can always hold up on the bad news. But
there was some story in the New York Times
coming out of London which - about the Canadian

dollars and so forth.

Clark:

I see. Then I also show a historical state-

ment covering our deficit with you by various
periods since the outbreak of war and how that

284
7-

deficit has been met, and finally we made
a revision, a complete and very thorough

investigation - revision of our national
income for the next fiscal year, raising you will remember that I told you the last
time I was here that Mr. Ilsley, the Minister
of Finance, in his presentation of the War

Appropriation Bill to the House of Commons,
had assumed for next year a national income

of five billion three hundred million. I said

that that would probably be larger as a result

of new information we had received here recently,
for the purpose of my discussion with you,

assumed a five billion three or a five billion
six hundred million national income.

Well now, we actually, by methods that perhaps

may be a little generous, get that national
income up to five billion nine hundred fifty

million dollars for next year. That is gross
income produced, including all transfer pay-

ments. Then I show in the table that I left

with Mr. Cochran, the expenditures on non-war
items of the Dominion and the provinces and

municipalities. I show our total war expenditures and the assistance that will probably
have to be rendered to the United Kingdom.

The net result of this table shows that while

we had three billion fifty-one million dollars
in 1939, the calendar year of 1939, available

for civilian use out of the national income,
that is to say, either for consumption, civilian
consumption or private investment, and in the

following year, 1940, had three billion eight
hundred - three billion eight hundred - three

billion eighty-six million dollars. Next year,

after taking out these expenditures of governments, there would appear to be two billion
six hundred eleven million dollars available
for consumption or investment by the public.
That is a decline as compared with last year of

285

-8-

nearly five hundred million dollars. Or
look at it another way. We estimate that the
total burden on the Canadian economy in the
new fiscal year of governments for war and
non-war items would be 56 per cent of that
estimated national income. Now, we feel up

there that that is - that represents an
absolutely all-out national effort. We think

we are going to have a really very serious
problem of financing that, but that is what
we are trying to do. We are going to try and
tackle it with such courage and skill as we
possess.

I think that is all I have to say at the

moment. I merely wanted to -H.M.Jr:

That is 56 per cent on your war, but on your

Clark:

No, that is 56 per cent of the total national

H.M.Jr:

But that is for your war efforts.

Clark:

No, that is for the war, plus the expenditures

total budget, it is about 30, isn't it?
income.

of governments for non-war work.

Bell:

The war would be less.

H.M.Jr:

But the war was - I saw a figure of around
30 per cent for war only.

Clark:

Yes. Well, that would be roughly correct,
wouldn't it?

H.M.Jr:

I meant for the war only.

Clark:

It would be over 40 per cent, including the
assistance to the United Kingdom.

286
9-

Phillips:
White:

Wasn't that figure, Mr. White, 25 or 30,
their direct war expenditures?
I think so.

Clark:

That is what it was meant to be.

Wrong:

Canadian military forces.

H.M.Jr:

Somebody gave me a figure of 30 per cent.

Clark:

The direct war effort would be about 24 or 25
per cent of the total national income.

H.M.Jr:

Well, it is plenty, anyway.

Clark:

Well, we don't think we have got a small

problem up there. It is going to take all

that we possess, I think, to solve the next

year.
H.M.Jr:

Well, that is a very clear presentation of
your picture. We are glad to have it, and we
will study it very closely. Now, have you
got any immediate problems.

Clark:

Well, I don't know that they are necessarily

immediate, Mr. Secretary. I know you are
planning to leave tomorrow, and I raised with

you last time I was here the fact that new
problems perhaps would arise from the fact
that our deficit in United States dollars would
be larger than we had expected, and I said to
you that, to my mind, that would bring nearer
the day when we would have to consider liquidation of securities or some other methods of

financing that deficit. I raised also with

you the possibility of Lease-Lending the
British - or the United States component of
the British war orders in Canada, which would

ease the strain - the drain on our dollars to

287
- 10 -

some extent.
H.M.Jr:

Well now, let's take one thing at a time.
To the question of your securities, are you

ready - have you reached the point yet where

you want to sell them or not, the United
States securities?
Clark:

Well, we are ready to be guided by, first,
the problem itself; and secondly, your own

views as to what is the best thing for us
to do here. One worry that I think we all
have in relation to the sale of Canadian
securities here is whether the - if we dump

more securities on your market, whether the

net effect of that will not be merely to re-

duce the amount of United States dollars
which the United Kingdom gets from the sale

of securities in your market.

H.M.Jr:

Well, could I approach it a little bit from a
different angle? I was so rash as to give
some advice last June or July to England,

which they didn't take, that they raise the

money before the needed it, and I don't think
there is much question but what you are going
to need it.
Clark:

We will need it - perhaps not immediately.
We can go on for awhile without actual sale

of securities.

H.M.Jr:

Well, if I were in your shoes, what I would
do is, I would get the machinery set up here
to sell your securities. I would have an

office either with or next to Mr. Gifford,

who has handled himself very skillfully, and
every time there is a chance to sell some

securities on a rising market, I would do it,

and then I would put the money away, but if
you wait three or four months until you are

288
- 11 -

right up against it - well, there might be
a condition of the market that you couldn't.
I would get the machinery set up, and every

time that there is a little strength in our

market, I would sell something.
Bell:

How soon do you think you might need to sell
them, Mr. Clark?

Clark:

Well, it is pretty difficult to say. It
depends on how far you want to let your

reserve of gold and United States dollars

run down, you see. If we are willing to let

them run down to nothing, then you could carry

on for several months. If you want to stop

before you get too near the bottom, before you
get completely broke in respect to cash, you

would start earlier than that. It is true,
I think, that once the spring months, the

summer months open up, we will get a little

bulge, we will get a little improvement from
tourist receipts, you see. The monthly drain
would probably not be quite as large as it

would be during the winter months, and that
may postpone for a little while, a few months,
at least, the time at which we absolutely have

to begin selling.

H.M.Jr:

Well, for whatever it is worth, I don't give

Clark:

Yes. You believe thoroughly that the - that

H.M.Jr:

Oh, definitely. Well, Gifford has handled

advice lightly, but I give it for what it is
worth, I give it to you.

there should be coordination between the sales
of the two countries.

this thing beautifully, and after all, you

can benefit by his experience, and it should
be coordinated, but I wouldn't wait until you
need it.

289
- 12 -

Clark:

Have the machinery set up anyway.

H.M.Jr:

Yes, and then if there is a good market,

Clark:

You don't think the effect would be merely

sell something.

that the total receipts of the two countries

would only be equivalent to what the United
Kingdom is now getting?

H.M.Jr:

No, because here recently Gifford has been

able to dispose of - well, in one day what

he was doing in November in one week.
Clark:

Well, we have had to - we gave you a list of
our marketable securities last December. They
were based on valuations, I think, at the end
of the previous year. Well now, the market
values of those securities are about 52 million
dollars below what we put in that estimate for
you.

H.M.Jr:

Don't ask me whether they are going to go up

Clark:

I would get you to sell our securities.

H.M.Jr:

No, that is the way I feel, and if on the

or down. If I knew that --

other hand, you wait and you still have stuff
to sell and you need the money, then you may

be getting in each other's way. How do you
feel about that, Sir Frederick?

Phillips:

Well, I had a word with Mr. Clark before, sir,
and we were quite in agreement that it would

be very nice to go on to the selling.
H.M.Jr:

But how about my advice to have them set up

Phillips:

Well, I think he has got some work to do. I

their office now?

290
- 13 -

think he has got some work to do in regis-

tering --

Clark:

Yes, we will have to re-register. That would

be our first step, I think, Mr. Secretary.

Phillips:

It would take anyhow a month or two before

he could start.

H.M.Jr:

But you don't differ?

Phillips:

Oh no, I don't differ at all.

Clark:

Would it be necessary, Mr. Morgenthau, to
make any arrangements with the Securities
and Exchange Commission?

H.M.Jr:

All you do is, whoever the man is, we do just

what we did with Mr. Gifford. We will introduce you to the chairman and let him know,

and I think - Mr. Gifford, I think, sends us
the figures, and we let the Securities and
Exchange know, but I don't think - I think
they took the position they didn't want to

know what the securities were, because they
couldn't guarantee secrecy, so therefore,
they asked us not to show them to them.
Clark:

I see.

H.M.Jr:

But I think the best thing to say would be
if you would be willing to put yourself in
our hands, we would follow the same routine
that we did with Mr. Gifford.

Clark:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

And we could get the same information, but

they did not want the details because they
said they would not guarantee secrecy. We

have been able to guarantee secrecy.

291
- 14 -

Clark:

Yes. Well, we will be very glad to give you
all the information.

H.M.Jr:

We are not held responsible for what Kintner
and Alsop write, I hope.

Clark:

Well, the second point was whether it would
be possible for - to arrange some leaselending provisions in regard to the United
States component of the British purchases in
Canada.

H.M.Jr:

That answer is, you will have to see Mr.
Hopkins. He has taken that over, so you will
have to arrange through your Legation here to
see him, or whatever way it is. But he is the
person to see. That is now out of my hands.
I am glad to say that.

Clark:

Well, I think that is all I have, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

All right. Mr. Wrong, anything on your mind?

Wrong:

No, I don't think so, Mr. Secretary. Mr.

H.M.Jr:

Has your Minister arrived?

Wrong:

Yes.

H.M.Jr:

Dan, have I said anything I shouldn't?

Bell:

No, sir. You have covered it pretty well.

H.M.Jr:

Have I?

Bell:

It is all right.

H.M.Jr:

Phillips, have you got anything on your mind?

Phillips:

No, sir. I have made it quite clear that I am

Clark has stated all we have.

292
- 15 -

not
in a position to make any payments to
Canada.
Clark:

Well, I think that point relates to whether

the United Kingdom would be able to meet any

part of her deficit with Canada by the transfer
of any gold or United States dollars to Canada.

H.M.Jr:

Well, we understand what their position viz
a viz us is, and I think we understand what

there position is viz a viz you.

I think these meetings are very good, and I
think we ought to do them at least once a
month, and certainly we are going to do everything we can to be helpful, certainly on the
financial front where we are all together.

I recognize that. We will do all we can.

Clark:

Yes. Well, to the extent that gold comes to
us or United States dollars or that the
British forces lease-lend it, of course, we
merely do something to solve our problem with

you. We defer the day, so to speak, when we
have to do other things to meet - take other
actions to meet the deficit with you.

Bell:

These parts that you buy in the United States

to go into British orders in Canada, do they
amount to very much money?

Clark:

We estimate in these figures that I have given
to you that in the coming twelve months that
will amount to about two hundred for ty-four

million of Canadian dollars, isn't it, about
two hundred twenty million of United States
dollars.

Bell:

That is quite a substantial item, then.

Clark:

It is quite a substantial item in our deficit

293
- 16 -

with you, and it is due to British purchases
rather than our own stuff, you see.
Phillips:

It is like everything else, Mr. Bell. You
start with a perfectly clear case like an

airplane engine, and it obviously could
easily be brought under the Lend-Lease Bill.
When you have every kind of intermediate

case, you wind up with something more diffi-

cult, machine tools and that sort of thing,
so 248 is the theoretical figure.

H.M.Jr:

All right, gentlemen.

294
(Handed by Financial Attache Coynes of the Canedian Embassy to Mr. Cochran

in the Treasury at 12 noon, March 19. 1941.)

CANADA'S WAR EXPENDITURES

(Millions of Canadian dollars)
Fiscal Years April-March

Total to

1939-40 1940-41 1941-42

March 1942

(Prelim.) (Est.)
Direct war expenditures - army,

navy, air force, munitions, etc.

118

875

1,450

2,443

Financing of British purchases -

by repatriation of securities,

accumulation of sterling balances,

etc.

Total for war, direct and indirect

- -

(Approx.).

(1)

-

113

434

1,152

231

1,309

2,602 (2) 4,142

535

440

433

1,699

N.B. Compare non-War federal

expenditures - ordinary
capital and special,

excluding wheat

1,408

Notes: (1) Estimated British deficiency of Canadian dollars, before
allowing for any transfer of gold or United States
dollars from Great Britain to Canada.
(2) This represents $226 per head of population

295
Treasury Department
TELEGRAPH OFFICE

PO7 MA

w7 14 VIA MRT
REP NEWYORK NY MAR 19 1941 1140A

1941 MAR 19 PM 12 23

HON HENRY MORGENTHAU

TREAS DEPT WASHDC

SORRY ILLNESS FAMILY PREVENTED COMMUNICATING WITH YOU YESTERDAY

STOP EQUITABLE SUBSCRIBING ONE FIFTH TOTAL
THOS I PARKINSON
1222p.

mrs Perturon - flowtes

296

March 19, 1941
3:11 p.m.
Rudolf

Forster:
H.M.Jr:

Hello, Mr. Secretary.
Yee, Forster.

I've just gotten over here one of your
"strictly confidential" envelopes. If
there 18 any hurry in this you'd better

F:

let me send it back to you and you put

F:

it in the form of a wire.
I don't know what is in it.
I don't either.

H.M.Jr:

Open it.

F:

I never open anything from you that comes

H.M.Jr:

marked "strictly confidential".

H.M.Jr:

Well, I'm asking you to now.
Well, I'11 do that now then.
I'11 hold on.

F:

All right. (Pause) It's an estimate of

H.M.Jr:

(Laughs).

F:

Marked D.W.B., initialed.

H.M.Jr:

The name is Bell.

F:

Daniel W. Bell.

H.M.Jr:
F:

income tax deposits of March, 1941. (Laughs).

F:

All right.
All right.

H.M.Jr:

Thank you.

F:

Thank you, sir.

H.M.Jr:

297

March 19, 1941

My dear Mr. Forster:

I thought you might like to
have a photostat of the inclosed

letter to the President for your
files.
Yours sincerely,

H. S. Klots,

Private Secretary.

Mr. Rudolf Forster,
Executive Clerk,

The White House.
Enclosure.

By 515

298

March 19, 1941

My dear Mr. Forster:

I thought you might like to
have a photostat of the inclosed

letter to the President for your
files.
Yours sincerely,

H. S. Klots,

Private Secretary.

Mr. Rudolf Forster,
Executive Clerk,

The White House.
Enclosure.

By Memories

299
THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON

I'ce Wa

in
7

March 17, 1941.

My dear Mr. President:

I should like to renew my objection to the attached

draft of a press release submitted by Secretary Stimson on
Friday.

Secretary Stimson's proposed press release states:

"The position taken by these states [which
impose sales and similar taxes] has caused
such uncertainty that materielmen are
threatening not to sell and contractors
are threatening to stop work."
So long as the Federal Government continues to reimburse

contractors for state and local sales taxes as part of the
contract cost, there is no reasonable basis for any contractor
who works for the Government on a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee basis

to threaten to stop work because of such state and local taxes.
The proposed press release also states:

"It is obvious that, if these taxes are
paid, certain favored states will be

unduly enriched at the creense of the
national defense program and of other
states.

This seeks to isolate one small phase of the whole field of
Federal and state tax immunities and fails to take into
consideration the broader aspects of the inter-governmental

300

-2immunity problem.

The legislation suggested in the press statement
proposed by Secretary Stimson would compel us to give up

our present efforts (1) to end the exemption from Federal

taxation of the income from future obligations of state and
local governments, and (2) to give state and local govern-

ments the right to tax the income from future Federal
obligations.
Furthermore, it would place us in the untenable

position of trying to collect taxes on all private income,
even if it is derived from a state or municipal government,
while at the same time preventing the states from taxing in
a non-discriminatory manner purchases of private contractors
because they have a contract with the Federal Government.
You and I have been disturbed for some time by the

overlapping of Federal, state and municipal taxation and by

the inequalities resulting from the doctrine of reciprocal
immunity. The Treasury has been trying to clarify this situation in Congress and in the courts.
In carrying out the program to end tax-exemption, the
Bureau of Internal Revenue last Friday began a test case
against seven bondholders of the Port of New York Authority,

for the purpose of settling the constitutionality of a

-3-

301

Federal income tax on future state and local obligations.
Once the courts have established the validity of such a

tax, it will greatly facilitate the enactment by Congress
of the short and simple statute twice recommended by you
to end the immunity from income tax of these issues.

An immunity bill of the sort suggested by Secretary

Stimson would, in my opinion, frustrate our efforts in this
direction and might remove for many years any hope of repealing the exemption in the Internal Revenue Code of state and

municipal issues. The question of the taxability of state
and municipal bondholders upon the interest they receive is

closely analogous to that of the taxability of articles
bought or used by a Federal contractor. In both cases the
expenses of the Government might be lessened if an exemption

were granted, but this is not an adequate basis for asserting
immunity. The sound test is whether the taxing statute
discriminates against the Federal Government or against a

Federal contractor in favor of other taxpayers. To prohibit
the imposition of state sales taxes as suggested by Secretary

Stimson abandons this test and substitutes by legislation
the reciprocal immunity doctrine only recently discarded by
the Supreme Court.

4

302

The taxes of which the contractors now complain are

not discriminatory. They are state sales taxes, gasoline
taxes and the like, which are applied equally to Federal con-

tractors and to all other taxpayers.
The burden on the Federal Government resulting from

state sales taxes is a normal incident of the organization
within the same territory of two governments, each possessed

of the taxing power.

Our Treasury estimates, incidentally, show that the
additional cost to the Army and Navy as a result of such state
and municipal taxes would not exceed $5,000,000 a year, and

that the total additional cost of cost-plus contracts for the
whole 28 1/2 billion dollar defense program would not be over

$15,000,000. On the other hand the Treasury will ultimately
receive additional revenue of $200,000,000 a year if it suo-

ceeds in its attempt to end tax-exemption of interest from

future state and municipal securities. This figure is, of
course, based upon present income-tax rates, and will be in-

creased materially by the higher rates we shall have to impose to finance national defense.
Moreover, Secretary Stimson's proposal would also

prevent the states and municipalities from deriving additional
revenue from Federal defense activities to pay for expenses

5-

303

incurred as a result of those activities.
If we must choose between Secretary Stimson's pro-

posal and the Treasury's program, it seems to me that we

should choose the legislation which will not only result
in a far greater saving to the Government but which will
help us to build a more equitable tax system as well.
I strongly recommend against the issuance of Secre-

tary Stimson's press release and the introduction of the
legislation suggested by him.

Faithfully yours,
Secretary of the Treasury

The President
The White House

Enclosure

304

Do. the
My attention has been called by the War and Navy

Departments to a serious condition caused by uncertainty as

to the application of state sales and similar taxes levied on
contractors engaged on national defense projects on a cost-plusa-fixed-fee basis.

Eighteen states have held that taxes of this nature
are not applicable because of Federal immunity, and a number have

not ruled on the question. However, several states have held
that such taxes do apply and have taken active steps to make

collection. The position taken by these states has caused such
uncertainty that materielmen are threatening not to sell and con-

tractors are threatening to stop work. It is obvious that, if
these taxes are paid, certain favored states will be unduly enriched
at the expense of the national defense program and of other states.
Duy

I am having a bill prepared for submission to Congress

is designed to clarify this situation. # Until the matter is adjusted.
the Government will refrain, where practicable, from placing any

cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contracts in those states which insist upon
applying their taxes to transactions covered by such contracts.

305

March 19, 1941
3:30 p.m.
H.M.Jr:

Hello.

Operator:

Admiral Waesche.

Admiral
Waesche:

Waesche speaking, Mr. Secretary.

H.M.Jr:

You called yesterday.

W:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

What was on your mind?

W:

I just wanted to report back after I had
investigated the matter of your plane that the plane was in shape. I think you
probably know the whole story now.

H.M.Jr:

I know it now, yeah.

W:

Yes. That was the only thing. I wanted
to report back on the situation regarding
your plane.

H.M.Jr:
W:

Thank you.

All right, sir.

306

March 19, 1941.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY'S DIARY

At 3:30 Messrs. Foley and Bernstein saw Mr. Istorik

relative to the proposal to borrow money in this country
for the purposes of the Anglo-Palestine Bank and the
Palestine Foundation Fund. At 3:45 the group went in
to see Secretary Morgenthau and the proposal was described

to the Secretary. The Secretary's immediate reaction was

that the proposition was not a business proposition nor
one that this Government could participate in, but that
the proposal involved an appeal to the "heart". Secretary
Morgenthau told Mr. Istorik that Bernstein would discuss
the matter with him with a view to seeing if something
could be worked out whereby an appeal could be made to

private people in this country to contribute funds to the
Anglo-Palestine Bank on a more or less philanthropic basis,

receiving perhaps a certificate of stock in the bank for
their contribution.
Secretary Morgenthau also told Mr. Istorik that
Pinsent of the British Embassy had submitted the matter to
us previously and that the Department had disapproved of
the proposal for any Government loan.

307

March 19, 1941
3:45 p.m.

RE DEFENSE SAVINGS BONDS

Present:

H.M.Jr:
Graves:

Mr. Bell

Mr. Graves
Mr. Kuhn
Mr. Schwarz
Mr. Gaston

All right, gents, at your service.
The first thing, I suspect, is this proposed
press release.

H.M.Jr:

Well, read it out loud in your melodious voice.
You are getting it at the same time I am,
Herbert, so you have no advantage over me,

or I over you.

Gaston:

I didn't expect to get an advantage over you.
(Laughter.)

Graves:

This is for release in the morning newspapers,
Friday, March 21.

"Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today
announced the new issues of United States
Savings Bonds and Stamps to go on sale May 1,

which have been developed to help in financing
the National Defense program.

308

-2"In meeting the cost of this tremendous

effort', the Secretary said, 'the Government must do more than find billions of

dollars. It must find these dollars in a

way that will best safeguard the nation

against the evils of inflation, and will give
all American citizens a sense of taking a
direct part in the defense of the country."
That ends the quote.

H.M.Jr:

Who are you quoting?

Bell:

You. You are making the statement.

H.M.Jr:

Oh.

Graves:

"Three new kinds of United States Savings

Bonds will be sold. The first kind, called
the Defense Savings Bond, will be almost

identical with the present United States

Savings Bond or "baby bond," which has become

the most widely held single security in the

country. More than $5,000,000,000 worth,
at maturity values, have been bought by more
than two million men and women."
H.M.Jr:

No children?

Graves:

As a matter of fact, children could go into it.

Gaston:

Very large in number, relative numbers.

Graves:

I think maybe that would be a nice thing.

H.M.Jr:

Sure, children, men, and women.

Graves:

Men, women, and children.

H.M.Jr:

All right.

309

-3-

Graves:

"The Defense Savings Bond will be offered

for 75 per cent of its maturity value, with

maturity of 10 years. Thus, a Defense Savings
Bond bought in May, 1941, for $18.75 will be
redeemable in May, 1951, for $25.00. This
is an increase of 33 1/3 per cent, equal to

an annual interest rate of 2.9 per cent. This
bond is not transferable, will not fluctuate

in value, and may be redeemed at any time before

maturity at values printed on its face. Intended chiefly for people of small income,

ownership is restricted to individuals in
their own right, with a limit upon holdings

of $5,000 maturity value in any one calendar

year.
Gaston:

Did you say a limit of holdings?

Graves:

Yes, I had in the copy that I last saw the

word "purchases," and I made a check on that.

Gaston:

Yes, you don't mean holdings.

Graves:

It is a limit on purchases. "Denominations

Bell:

Should we say that the present Series F Savings
bonds will be discontinued May 1? We will have

are $25, $50, $100, $500, and $1,000.

a lot of inquiries on that.
Graves:

I think it is a good thing to say.

Gaston:

Ought to be a little careful about that.

Schwarz:

You say new issues in your lead. You don't

say replacing. As a matter of fact, it

wouldn't make a whole lot of difference, because we say that the new bond is almost

identical to the present savings bond.

Bell:

You are saving answering a lot of inquiries.

310

-4-

Graves:

Yes.

"The new Series F Savings Bond, intended for

larger investors, for trustees, and for reserve funds, is offered for 74 per cent of
its maturity value, with maturity of 12 years.
It can be held not only by individuals, but
by trustees, associations, pension funds, and
corporations, except banks for their own
account, with a limit of $50,000 maturity
value issued in any one calendar year, alone

or in combination with Series G. If held to
maturity, the interest rate is 2.53 per cent

a year. The Series F Bond is not transferable,

and may be redeemed at any time after six
months from date of issue in accordance with

a table of redemption values printed on its

face. Denominations are $100, $500, $1,000,

$5,000 and $10,000.

"To meet demand for a current income bond, the
new Series G Savings Bond, to be issued at

par, bears interest during its 12-year term at

2.5 per cent, paid semi-annually by Treasury

check. Intended for both small and large investors, the Series G Bond is not transferable,
and can be registered like Series F in the

name of individuals, associations, and corporations, except banks for their own account, up

to a total of $50,000 maturity value, alone or

in combination with Series F. Denominations
are $500, $1,000, $5,000, and $10,000."

That again has got to be corrected to make sure
that they understand it is annual purchases and
not annual holdings.
H.M.Jr:

It does good to read it out loud, doesn't it?

Graves:

Yes.

311

-5-

"Denominations are $500, $1,000, $5,000,
and $10,000.

"Like the other two bonds, Series G is re-

deemable before maturity at fixed redemption

values printed on its face. In fixing these
values, inducement is given to holders to

retain their bonds until final maturity."

Bell:

Like the other two, do you want the thirty

Graves:

Yes.

days in here the same as in the others?

"Sales Agencies: Defense Sevings Bonds will
be on sale May 1, 1941, at 16,000 United
States Post Offices, at Federal Reserve Banks,

at all fiscal agencies of the United States,
and direct by mail from the Treasury. Series
F and G Savings Bonds will be on sale at all
these agencies __"

H.M.Jr:

The banks haven't said they would do that,
have they?

Graves:

No, we say all Federal Reserve Banks

H.M.Jr:

You don't say all?

Bell:
Gaston:

They are all doing it now.
We can order them to do it.

H.M.Jr:

We go on now about the banks.

Graves:

"Arrangements are now being made through

which orders for bonds of all three series
will be accepted at commercial and savings
banks."

H.M.Jr:

That is all right.

312

-6-

Graves:

"Postal Savings Stamps: Great emphasis
is laid by Secretary Morgenthau upon the
importance of Postal Savings Stamps as a
means of encouraging steady savings among
the youth of America and all others to whom

payment of $18.75 at one time for the
smallest Defense Savings Bond is not convenient.
The Postmaster General has approved a new

series of stamps, of special design, priced
at 10d, 25d, 50c, $1, and $5. Purchasers

will be given attractive pocket albums in

which to mount them. An album containing
75 of the 25d stamps has a cash value of
$18.75 and can be exchanged for a Defense

Savings Bond which in 10 years will be worth

$25. There are similar albuns for mounting

the 50g, $1, and $5 stamps, exchangeable for
$50 or $100 bonds.

Bell:

Are you going to put out the ten cent stamp
right now, the album?

Graves:

We have the stamp out but we have no album,

Dan. They are going to use the card that
they have always been using.

Bell:

You see, that is a hiatus. The denominations

Graves:

As a matter of fact, we don't expect that to
be very much used, but actually it does exist

are ten, but you have no album and you have
no exchange into a bond or other stamps.

in the Series F Postal Savings Stamps.

Bell:

Do you think it ought to be in there?

Graves:

It has really got to be in there, because
that is the denomination that is included.
But we don't have an album for it. They
have got to continue to use the card that

313

-7-

they have always been using for that

denomination.

"Organization: 'Every man, woman and child

in America will be given full details of this
National Defense savings plan, and easy ways

to take part in it, Secretary Morgenthau
said. A new division of the Treasury Depart-

ment, called the Defense Savings Staff, has
been created under the supervision of Harold

N. Graves, Assistant to the Secretary. It
includes Eugene W. Sloan, administrative

director, Gale F. Johnston, field director,

and Harford Powel, director of information."
I emphasized that because that is the first
time you have heard, perhaps, of that new

term. Mr. Bell and I have decided it is an
appropriate name.

H.M.Jr:

What do you call yourselves?

Bell:

Defense Savings Staff.

Gaston:

Brigadier Generals.

Graves:

Defense Savings Staff.

Gaston:

I would suggest, Harold, that instead of saying that the issue of the savings bonds will
be discontinued, I would say that the savings -

this security, that it will replace your

savings bonds and will be available to all
the regular purchasers of United States Savings Bonds.
Graves:

Fine.

Bell:

This is somewhat comparable to what we had

during the war. We had a War Loan Staff, Mr.
Secretary.

314

-8-

H.M.Jr:

Is this agreeable to you?

Bell:

Yes. Isn't that the one I initialed?

Graves:

Yes.

Bell:

I thought I had.

Gaston:

There is nothing in there about redemption, is
there?

Bell:

Yes, be redeemed --

Schwarz:

Thirty days.

Graves:

We say in each case, Herbert, will be redeemed

at any time before maturity at values printed
on the face of the bond.

H.M.Jr:

You don't want to put in the name of Mr.
Odegarde as consultant?

Graves:

We thought that we would from time to time
have other things to release. Mr. Odegarde
is right now working on an advisory group,

and I think that perhaps the time to mention

Odegarde would be when there is publicity
about that advisory group.
Kuhn:

H.M.Jr:
Graves:

I would like to keep it to the three steadies,

I think, at this time.
All right.

We have got to do some changing on this to
meet the points that have been discovered
here.

H.M.Jr:

Now, this goes out - is it released tomorrow
morning at 10:30 for the following morning?

315

-9-

Schwarz:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

And how do you get this into the field? Do
you give this to the various people to give
to newspapers?

Bell:

We can send this by wire to all the Federal
Reserve Banks and ask them to r elease it, to

give it out in their cities, send it to all
the banks for release Friday morning.

Schwarz:

We give it to a hundred correspondents here

who will send a large part of it to their
papers so it gets to the bigger papers.

H.M.Jr:

And you do it to the Federal Reserve?

Bell:

We could. That is the way we do our financing.

Now, the trouble with giving it to the papers,

they don't send it by wire to the Coast. It
is too expensive.

Schwarz:

That is right.

Bell:

But if we sent it to the banks to release there,
you would probably get it quoted in the
papers.

Kuhn:

Another thing, we could send out copies to-

night by air mail to ten or twelve of the big

newspapers that might be most likely to comment

on the thing editorially and send it to their
editors so that the editors will have the full
statement before them at the time it is re-

leased in Washington. There is no possible
chance of a slip-up there because you send-it
only to morning papers, and they will have gone

to press already by the time --

H.M.Jr:

When do you send it to them?

316
- 10 -

Kuhn:

Well, it could be sent tonight to arrive in

Chicago and New York and Boston in the morning.

Bell:

It can be in the hands of several thousand
banks Friday morning, if you wanted to have
the Fed send it out tomorrow night.

H.M.Jr:

Yes. Well, the Fed could send it out tomorrow
morning.

Bell:

Yes, so they get it up tomorrow night. They
have to mimeograph it and get it into the mail
tomorrow afternoon.

H.M.Jr:

But that doesn't do any good, to get it in
the Friday morning's papers.

Schwarz:

It is too late.

Bell:

I am thinking in addition to the papers, get
it into the hands of the banks as a statement.

H.M.Jr:

Oh, that is all right. Well, let me just -

let's just get - I would handle it, number 1,
from your end, as any publicity financial

statement that we want the Federal Reserve
System to get in the hands of the newspapers,

so that they will put it in the Friday morning's
papers. Let's do it that way. I mean, just
like my bond issue.

Bell:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

I mean handle it that way, you see. That would

Bell:

That is all right.

H.M.Jr:

Is that all right?

be number one.

317

- 11 -

Bell:

Yes, sir.

H.M.Jr:

I mean, that would go out tomorrow morning
on the Federal Reserve wire system.

Bell:

That is right.

H.M.Jr:

For Friday morning release. That would be
one way, just like a Treasury financing.

That is Number 1. Then Number 2, you (Kuhn)

want to send it to key papers. That is all
right, and we give it out here at 10:30. I
think that is pretty good coverage, isn't it?
Schwarz:

That is good first coverage, and we can keep
pushing from there.

H.M.Jr:

And I think it ought to go, besides that -

The Post Office has a system and we ought to

ask them to put it in the hands of every postmaster in the United States.
Bell:

They could quote it in their - when does that
come out, their journal, bulletin?

Graves:

Oh, they will undoubtedly put it in their
bulletin.

H.M.Jr:

I think if Dan does it just like a financial
statement through the Federal Reserve System,
just as though - we would like every newspaper

in the United States through the Federal

Reserve System to get an announcement for this

thing. That is the system. We do that

through the Federal Reserve, and we do it

here besides. It is a little duplication,
but there is no difficulty.
Kuhn:

I was thinking rather of the people who would
comment on that.

318
- 12 -

Bell:

Do that, too.

H.M.Jr:

Oh, I would do that to some of them. I think
that is good. Herbert, any comment?

Gaston:

No, I think that line-up is all right. I

suppose you are later going to have some local
organization stories?

Graves:

Yes, as Mr. Morgenthau just said, we can get

out later distribution through postmasters

to reach cities of ten thousand and less. It
ought to be somewhat different.

Gaston:

No, but I mean you are going to have stories
of local organizations which will be coming

up later for local distribution.
Graves:

Later.

H.M.Jr:

There is just one thing that I would like to

have. You couldn't give me a cut of the stamp
and have a mat made which could be sent out

for distribution?

Graves:

No. We can't print that stamp. Am I right,
Dan?

H.M.Jr:

No, you are wrong. I cleared that with Secret

Kuhn:

I make this suggestion --

Graves:

Has that been changed?

H.M.Jr:

Yes.

Bell:

I think it has been changed a number of times.

Service. It is printed now in any catalog or

With the approval of the Secretary, I think it

is all right.

319

- 13 -

H.M.Jr:

You pick up a Scott catalog. They now
reproduce all the stamps.

Gaston:

Yes. There is a special law on the subject
now. They have to be off-size.

Graves:

Yes.

Gaston:

By a certain degree from postage stamps.

H.M.Jr:

But I would like to have a mat prepared, you

see, of this stamp. I don't care what size

it is. If it isn a regular size, take the
twenty-five cent - what is the next size

above the ten?
Graves:

Twenty-five.

H.M.Jr:

Is that an odd size?

Graves:

No, it is a postage stamp size.

H.M.Jr:

Well, what is the next size?

Graves:

Well, we have no stamp of that size.

Gaston:

We have to magnify them in order to let them

print them. I think it has to be at least one
and a half times the size. You can blow it

up to any size.
H.M.Jr:

If I was going to do it, I would like to use

the ten cent stamp.

Graves:

You don't mean in connection with this release?

H.M.Jr:

Oh no, just as soon as we can.

Bell:

And you would send that out, too, to everybody
so they can see what they look like?

320
- 14 -

H.M.Jr:

That is right.

Graves:

We haven't yet had the formal approval of these

H.M.Jr:

The minute you get it, I would have ten

stamps by the Postmaster General.

thousand mats made, and if your weekly news-

papers and all that kind of stuff --

Kuhn:

Later on.

H.M.Jr:

Well, within a couple of weeks. Just as soon
as the stamp is finished.

Graves:

The stamps are finished now, that is, we have
the proofs of them.

H.M.Jr:

Well, just as soon as you can get it, I would
like to see a cut of the stamp, the boiler-

Schwarz:

plate stuff. Isn't that what you call it?
That is right.

H.M.Jr:

To go out.

Schwarz:

As a matter of fact, we won't have to stand
the expense of those mats. We can get Western

Newspaper Union and NAA and others to send
them out.
H.M.Jr:

Whatever way you can do it, Chick.

Schwarz:

Ferdie and I were talking over some of the
questions that might be asked tomorrow. I
think you might like to talk about them.

H.M.Jr:

Yes. What else?

Kuhn:

I had only this suggestion to make, that in

the press conference tomorrow we stick to the

actual issues that we are putting out, the

321
- 15 -

actual financial details, and lay off any
details of our publicity schemes or our
promotion devices or the design of the

stamps or the legend on the posters, be-

cause the more we tell of that in the beginning,
the more we hurt our publicity
later.
H.M.Jr:

I will stick to that.

Kuhn:

Do you agree?

H.M.Jr:

Yes. That is all right.

Gaston:

The issues and the economics of it. That is

Kuhn:

The publicity is for later on.

H.M.Jr:

I want both Bell and Graves at my press conference tomorrow, and Kuhn. You can all three

the story. The other isn't the story.

be here tomorrow.

Graves:

May I bring up a slightly different thing

H.M.Jr:

If the nurse is there, I want to take that
inoculation, but otherwise --

Graves:

We have here letters to the heads of the
broadcasting systems and a draft of a letter
which we intend to duplicate with your approval

about this?

to send out to all of the independent stations
in the country, leading to our radio advertising. We are paving the way for an approach
to our radio people.

H.M.Jr:

Do you want to blot these for me?

Graves:

Sure.

H.M.Jr:

Did you check your movie actress with the

322

- 16 -

National Committeewoman from California?
Kuhn:

Not yet, because we have been talking to Will
Hays' office, who says we can get a large

number of top-flight movie stars in our first
trailer, easy, without any trouble, and also

there is a chance of getting the publicity man
from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer to work for us one

day a week, and he is the best man in the
industry.
Schwarz:

Howard Dietz? He is very good.

H.M.Jr:

How is he going to come here?

Kuhn:

Apparently he is in New York quite a lot.

Graves:

Mr. Hays called me a while ago merely to say
that they were planning to cooperate with us.

H.M.Jr:

Wonderful.

Graves:

Fully.

H.M.Jr:

Wonderful.

Kuhn:

They say there is no trouble about making a

trailer to appear all over the country about
the 15th of May, if we pay the out-of-pocket
costs of making the prints and shooting, and
they will have a trailer with Ginger Rogers
and everybody under the sun in it.

Gaston:

Oh, I thought it was going to be an automobile
trailer with Ginger Rogers.
(Laughter.)

H.M.Jr:

If we have Ginger Rogers, I insist she has got
to dance. I want Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire

323

- 17 -

to do a trailer.

I want them dancing again,

the two of them. They are the best dancing
team in America. That is nice work. Every-

body all right?

Bell:

Yes, sir.