View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For Release on Delivery
7:00 p.m., Pacific Time
Octob'er 19, 1956.

THE PURCHASING POtvER OF THE DOLLAR
Address by C. Canby Balderston,
Vice Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,




Before the Fifty-fifth Annual Convention
National Association of Supervisors of State Banks
San Francisco, California,
On Friday, October 19, 1956,

THE PURCHASING POfeER OF THE DOLLAR
Money is tight and the reasons need to be understood.
the protection of the buying power of the dollar.

At stake is

At stake also is the

stretching out of the present period of high prosperity and employment,
Fortunately the long future of our economy is one of rich promise,
Thanks to technological advance and population increase, the long-term
prospects are superb.

The wide recognition of this fact leads to the specu­

lative enthusiasm that inspires some of the current plant expansion.

These

prospects are so full of hope for high employment and an ever-rising scale of
living that it would be a pity indeed if they were to be lost through failure
to grapple with the immediate problems.

These problems stem from the fact

that currently aggregate demand is in excess of supply.

Prices are being

pushed upward, the economy endangered by cost squeezes, and values inflated
by speculation.

Too often binges have led to painful hangovers.

At a time when the general business climate is inflationary^ it is
obviously necessary to pursue credit policies designed to restrain excessive
credit expansion.

Also it is obviously not feasible for commercial banks to

provide for the accommodation of all who wish to borrow*

Some loan applica­

tions must necessarily be refused or deferred by commercial banks, even though
they may be technically credit-worthy,
The recent rise in interest rates, including Federal Reserve bank
discount rates, seems to have caused considerable apprehension lest the supply
of funds in the money market during the ensuing month's be insufficient to pro„.yert fu<v

vide for essential credit needsi^guch as .the movement of crops and the
financial

In view of this apparent

concern, it seems desirable to re-emphasize/that the Federal Reserve System




has no

intention of allowing such a situation to develop.

The Federal

Reserve System has the continuing duty of providing a monetary expansion
consistent with orderly growth of the economy.

The discount facilities of

the Federal Reserve banks continue to be available to member banks requir­
ing temporary funds for their essential needs.
The goal of economic progress is more jobs and more goods combined
with a dollar of stable buying power.

The road toward this goal stretches

ahead as an inviting path for us and our children provided the current
economic traffic does not become snarled.

Into the road there is now pour­

ing more economic traffic than the present road capacity will permit to
move forward at one time.

This traffic comes both from government and from

private sources; from corporations anxious to expand, and from individuals
who wish homes and other durable goods.

Too many people wish to get through

first even if they disregard the rules of the road.
What is the nature of this traffic jam that threatens to impede
economic progress?

The demand for scarce goods is exceeding the supply and

pushing prices upward.

This explains what has been happening with respect

to wholesale and consumer prices.
too fast.

Too many people want too many things

They want to build new plants, office buildings, ships and

planes at an unheard-of rate and still retain record rates of production
for residences and autos.

The resultant pyramiding of demand not only

creates scarcities such as that for steel and cement, but for certain
labor skills as well.
What is so clearly evident in the case of scarce materials and
labor applies also to money and credit.

The so-called tightness of credit

is often attributed to insufficient supply, whereas it has in fact resulted




chiefly from a pyramiding of demand.
.

Actually the supply of money and.

credit is larger than a year ago, instead of being smaller as many imply
when they use the phrase "tight money."
Moreover, money is being made to work harder.

Demand deposits

are being turned over about 8 per cent faster than a year ago.

This in­

crease in money activity is to be expected in a period of credit stringency,
and has the effect of making the supply of money more efficient.
The aggregate and rival demands of corporations and individuals
to borrow heavily in order to buy more goods than exist at the moment
explain

the concern over the cost and availability of credit,

When the

demand for credit exceeds the supply of it, the price tends to rise.

This

is how the marketplace allocates the existing supply of credit among the
rival claimants for it.

In the process, many individuals and companies are

disappointed that they cannot secure the funds to buy what they want right
away.

As a nation we are trying to spend faster than we save.

If we

should succeed, the higher prices that would result spell inflation with
all its dread consequences to savings and to those dependent upon them.
The well being is involved of wage earners who have pension rights and
similar fringe benefits as well as that of widows, school teachers and all
whose incomes are fixed.
There are some who would curb spending through price controls and
rationing.

Such direct or selective controls over imports, food, critical

materials and credit were resorted to by many nations, including our own,
during and immediately after the war.
only a partial answer.

It is my conviction that they are

Even supported by wartime patriotism, their success

was limited and in the end did not prevent inflation.




They did nob prevent

-

4

-

eventual loss in the purchasing power of the monetary unit.

And they did

involve the policing of hundreds of thousands of industrial and commer­
cial enterprises andfijf private citizens.

It is little wonder, therefore,

that country after country shook off this harness of governmental controls
when peacetime conditions permitted free markets to operate because such
markets enable individuals to determine for themselves what they need, what
they will buy, and at what price.

Even though many individual spending

decisions be unwise, the free market gives people the satisfaction of using
their own knowledge, judgment, and initiative.

In a democratic free-enterprise

economy we must depend upon free markets and upon intelligent, not irrational,
decisions on the part of businessmen and consumers.
The proper role of government in these matters is to be responsible
for fiscal policy, including the balancing of its own budget, and for general
monetary policy.
Congress.

Responsible for the fiscal policy are the Treasury and the

Responsibility for monetary policy has been assigned by the Con­

gress to the Federal Reserve System with a mandate to serve as a trustee
over the total supply of money and to carry on its work without fear or
favor, free from partisan political pressure on the one hand, or private
business pressure on the other,

Its particular role is to regulate the

reserves available to the commercial banks so that bank credit may expand
and contract flexibly in accordance with the fluctuating needs of the economy.
In the light of the Employment Act of 1946,those needs may be expressed most
simply as the fostering of sustained economic growth and the maintenance of
economic equilibrium.

There can be no economic equilibrium without stable

buying power of the dollar.
If the supply of credit becomes excessive in relation to the goods
and services available, prices tend to rise; if the converse is true, prices




-

tend to fall*

5-

Therefore, if the value of money is to be stable and to assist

the economy to move steadily upward, its supply (at the current rate of
deposit turnover) must be harmonized with the flow of goods*

Hence, the

supervision of government is needed over the total supply of money and credit*
The apportionment among individual borrowers, however, is best left to com­
petition between private borrowers and private lenders.

It is the respon­

sibility of the central bank to influence the total supply of credit but the
selection of the particular customers to whom loans are to be made is left to
the discretion of commercial bankers and other private lenders.
The Rules of the Economic Road
The problem, then, is to keep the economy running at high speed
without overstraining its capacity,

A continuous stream of transactions

must be kept running much like the stream of traffic on a crowded highway*
The latter can move with speed and safety only if drivers observe the traffic
rules brought forth by experience.
The rules of the economic road, like traffic rules, are sometimes
ignored.

Perhaps the most fundamental of them is the preservation of balance

and proportion between protection and risk, caution and daring, liquidity
and expansion.

Moreover, the quality of debt should not be impaired by equity

that is overly thin.

Finally, the decision-making of lenders and borrowers,

whether business executives

or consumers, must be prudent to provide economic

growth free from serious inflation or from recession with its destruction
of values.
The financial panic of 1907 that led to the founding of the Federal
Reserve System six years later, the inventory panic of 1920 and 1921 with its
crashing prices, and the collapsing stock market of 1929 and 1930 all preach




-

their respective sermons.

6

-

The quality of past business decisions .may be said

to determine the .fundamental soundness of the economy at any given time.

The

decisions of 1955 are reflected in the sales, inventory, and employment
figures of 1956 and may indeed influence those of 1957.

These b\isiness

decisions not only are influenced by group psjrchology; they help to create it.
Sometimes they reflect excessive pessimism; sometimes speculative optimism.
One lessorx of the depression of the 1930's ■
would seem to be that
if equity values suffer from too great destruction, thcs e executives who
must venture if the economy is to revive are too distraught and fearful to
do so; or if they have the requisite courage and daring, they may no longer
be considered credit-worthy by lenders.
In contrast is the psychology of ebullience and of unwarranted
optimism.

Financial history records boom after boom that burst because

men "chased the fast buck" at the sacrifice of prudence.
may be in order.

Two observations

One is that speculative fever m y not, if it should again

sicken the economy, take the form of stock market speculation like that of
1929 when margin requirements were too low and the rewards of the call-money
market were too enticing.
disguise.

Speculation has many forms of dress and even of

The second observation is that neither monetary control nor fiscal

policy, nor the two in concert, are likely to maintain economic stability if
group psychology runs rampant.

How could they revive business from depression

in the face of general despair?

Or prevent inflation amidst a wave of reck­

less business decisions?
The problem of protecting the purchasing power of the dollar is
like a three-legged stool.

It requires the combined action of general monetary

policy, of fiscal policy, and of prudent decision making by labor leaders,




-

business executives and consumers.

7

-

It would be highly desirable for each

businessman and consumer to regard himself as a trustee of the economic
health of the whole community,

A philosophy of trusteeship and a sense of

responsibility are salient features of democratic free enterprise and of a
healthy economy.