View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For. Release on Delivery
"(Approximately 12:30 p,m, EST,
Monday, April 20, 1959»)

THE LATE RECESSION— ITS LOSSES AND LESSONS
Address by C, Canby Balderston,
Vice Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Before the Philadelphia Eond Club,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
April 20, 1959.

THE LATE RECESSION— ITS LOSSES AND LESSONS
The

cyclical

contraction that ended in April of last year vras

one of the shortest on record.

It has been followed by a recovery of

classic pattern that has now pushed most of the business indicators through
their previous ceilings.

Personal income in constant dollars has gone

2-1/2 per cent beyond its prerecession high.

Real gross national product

and industrial production have achieved new records*

The trough from

which we emerged followed a giant wave of consumer buying capped by plant
expansion.

Over-capacity and excessive inventories led inexorably to

painful correction in the form of recession, with its worries, losses and
tribulations,
It is now time to take stock of the residual difficulties that
still face us.

Three major problems may be summarized in three words:

unemployment, prices, and debt.
Unemployment is down from its recession levels, but it continues
to plague the mining regions and areas dependent upon heavy industry.

The

list of cities with one out of eight workers jobless contains the longsuffering coal towns of Scranton, Uilkes-Barre and Huntington.

These have

been joined by Buffalo, Erie and even Detroit, which has been the epitome
of American initiative and mass production know-how.

The rate of unemploy­

ment 19 months after the last cycle peak is only slightly above comparable
experience in 1948-50, but is higher than the 1953-55 experience by about
one per cent.
Such a comparison may comfort statisticians but not the families
afflicted.

......

Even though furtii^r -'exgiSEneio^wi11 tend to put the idle to
//'V ,£>-■
\ Xl
/an unemployment level of over
work as overtime fails to meiet tjrie


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

l i b r a r v

- 2 -

4 million beings should lead us to question whether job opportunities
would not be greater if some prices were lower.
As expansion continues, the rising investment demand stemming
from industrial research and management initiative m i l require an in­
creased flow of savings.

If we are to remain competitive at home and

abroad, we shall need not only capital for implementing technological
advance, but competitive prices as well.
relative matter.

Competition is, of course, a

How do our products compare with those made in other

countries as to quality, price and promptness of delivery?

While we have

improved, others may have been improving even more rapidly.

Early this

year our exports were down one-fifth from early 1957« This decline may be
explained, in part, by cyclical developments abroad which reduced foreign
demands for our raw materials and finished goods.

At the same time, there

is clear evidence that our cherished advantage in some types of machinery,
as well as in autos, and certain other mass-produced items has been
diminishing.

This is a situation that will not be cured by ignoring

it, or by the mere passage of time, or by passing laitfs. The sole solution
lies in keeping our costs (including labor costs) competitive so that
American firms may produce what enough people want, at prices they are
willing and able to pay.
Prices were buoyant during the recent decline and subsequent
recovery.

In the recession, the industrial-price average fell less than

one per cent, even though prices of materials slipped considerably.
was similar to the 1953-54 experience.

This

Early last year, however, prices

of farm products and foods went up sharply.

As a result the total whole­

sale price index rose one per cent during the period of business contraction.


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

-

3

-

Since the turnaround in business activity in May 1958, the average of in­
dustrial prices has risen 2 per cent and is now about 1-1/2 per cent
above the previous all-time high.

Though there has been unused capacity

of human resources and manufacturing plants, industrial prices have risen
sooner and faster than in the two previous recoveries when prices did not
advance significantly until after output was well above its previous peak.
One may ponder the question:

have we paid the fee for an adjustment we

didn't get?
In this Devil's Brew of trouble, containing unemployment and ad­
vancing prices, there is also the ingredient of debt,

I refer not alone

to consumer and to business debt, but to that of local, State and Federal
governments.
In 1958 the growth in consumer instalment debt slackened, but
total consumer indebtedness, including residential mortgage credit, still
grew by -¿10,7 billion — a large figure even if less than the §18,9 billion
rise in 1955*

Practically all of last year's rise was in mortgage debt on

family houses which mounted |>10,4 billion to a total of .118 billion.

For­

tunately, this rise in the debt of individuals was more than offset by an
increase in their financial assets, and so 1958 was a year in which consumer
saving continued at a high rate.

Now, however, both consumer instalment

and mortgage debt are rising sharply.
But the governmental debt situation is far different.

It is not

necessary to detail the plight of State and local governments in increasing
their revenues.

Their troubles are being widely publicized.

The Federal

government's spending in excess of its revenue, however, is especially


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

-

4 -

serious because financing it has been complicated by the attitude of savers
toward fixed-income securities in general, and government bonds in particu­
lar*

Thus, balancing the Federal budget is more than a problem for the

Budget Director; it is an evidence of the nation’
s determination to pro­
tect the integrity of the dollar as a store of value.

As such, our budget

behavior is watched by the financially sophisticated the world over.
Whereas the Federal government had a cash surplus of $2,1 billion
in fiscal 1957 and a small deficit of $1,5 billion in fiscal 1958, it is
incurring a whopping cash deficit of over $13 billion in the current fiscal
year.

Federal cash receipts in fiscal 1959 will be about the same as in

fiscal 1958, but expenditures will be close to $12 billion larger than in
fiscal 1958 and $15 billion larger than in fiscal 1957.
Consequently, the Treasury has been frequently in the market for
funds because of fiscal decisions made in the past.

The deficit that has

to be financed currently is arising out of decisions made a year ago and
earlier,

For some time in the future we will have to live with the fiscal

decisions now being made.

We are all aware of the circumstances that have

given rise to large national defense expenditures.

At the same time, non­

military Federal expenditures have also increased, partly as the result
of farm price-support programs, partly as the result of governmental ac­
tions taken to offset recession, and partly as the result of such built-in
stabilizers as unemployment compensation.

Prospects are that although

economic recovery will bring a big increase in receipts next year, expendi­
tures will continue large.

The attainment of a balance is precarious unless

positive measures are adopted*


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

-

5

-

I turn now to certain Federal Reserve problems that are current,
A basic function of the System is to supply banks with reserves that will
provide the volume of credit that is in keeping with stable economic growth.
The objective is to supply neither too much credit nor too little.

Monetary

policy made credit easy during the period of economic contraction in order
to hasten the turn around.

Credit continued easy throughout the early re­

covery period and the money supply expanded very rapidly from February to
August,

If the money supply be measured by currency and demand deposits,

the annual rate of increase (seasonally adjusted) was about 8 per cent in
that brief period.

For those who prefer to include time deposits in their

definition, the rate of expansion was even more rapid,

With vigorous re­

covery of business in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve System
acted to moderate expansion in the money supply so that the increase for
the entire year 1958 was about 4 per cent.
increase of the appropriate amount?

Was this sharp counter-recession

Or did it exceed the needs for stable

growth?
Another problem faced by the System is to help achieve and main­
tain a proper relation between the total of demands on the capital markets
and the total flovr of saving.

If these capital needs cannot be met out of

voluntary savings and if an increase in the money supply under such circum­
stances would be inflationary, a monetary policy geared to sustainable
growth must be restrictive and some would-be borrowers must be disappointed.
Lessens of the Recession and Current Concerns
It is illuminating to ponder recent history in order to distill
from it whatever lessons it may teach us.


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Take business capital expenditures.

-

6

-

In the year 1955 we enjoyed an extraordinarily high level of consumer ex­
penditures for automobiles, for housing, and for many durable goods.

Busi­

nessmen, encouraged by these strong demands, stepped up their capital
expenditures, partly because they vsere projecting these demands into the
future0 The record level of outlays for fixed capital helped sustain economic
activity in 1956 and much of 1957, even though consumer spending for durables
and housing had receded sharply.

Then businessmen in many industries de­

cided their capacity was great enough to match foreseeable demand — sometimes
even greater.

They cut back their expansion programs.

The consequent fall­

ing off of business capital expenditures in 1957 was clearly a major factor
in the recession.
By the same token, the inventory policies that had seemed appro­
priate in the light of peak business activity were found by the fall of
1957 to be out of keeping with existing needs.
of rapid inventory liquidation*

Query:

And so there began a period

Is the present rate of inventory

accumulation sustainable?
Many of the currently prevailing prices and wage rates also repre­
sent decisions made some time agoa We are not sure of the extent to which
the inflexibility of industrial prices during the recession represented
lags in the price and wage determining process«,

But price rises during a

recession are certainly no help in fostering recovery.
Diluting the purchasing power of the dollar does not provide
permanent employment opportunities.

Persistent depreciation in the value

of the dollar does injure those who must live on fixed incomes.

But the

protection of the purchasing power of the dollar goes beyond the important


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 7consideration of equity for such individuals.

For one thing, inflation

diverts business energy into speculation and avray from the increasing of
output and of productivity.

We know that hyperinflation is disruptive to

the productive process; even small doses of inflation are inconsistent
with well-maintained productive activity*
Per capita growth is largely dependent upon technological ad­
vances bolstered by sufficient capital to take advantage of them.
a mistake to equate economic growth with governmental spending.
ask ourselves:

What kinds of growth are most beneficial?

It is
We must

What kinds of

governmental spending are conducive to stable growth and what kinds are
detrimental?
I should observe, in passing, that GNP is too limited a measure
of a country's progress and of its ability to satisfy human wants to serve
as the sole basis for comparing our country with other countries that operate
under entirely different rules.

The dollar value of GNP may rise while

living standards fall or while job-creating activity declines.
material goals are only one aspect of our way of life.

Furthermore,

In the economic

sphere, however, what is it we desire to be able to produce in greater
quantity?

Is it more missiles, or more perfume? More plant capacity, or

more schools and roads, or more farm crops?
consumer goods and services?

More producer goods, or more

In our economy, of course, the majority of

these decisions are made in the market place.

The role of government, how­

ever, has been progressively widened,
Government spending will not enhance the savings required to pro­
vide the tools and other capital equipment needed.


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Spending dictated by

- 8 -

pressure groups will scarcely achieve the changes needed for real and sus­
tainable growth— in fact, it may impede such changes.

Economic growth has

been associated with the shifting of resources, human and material, to new
industries and from less productive industries and occupations to those of
higher productivity,

A major example of changes in patterns of resource

utilization is the continued shift of farm workers and land to urban uses.
The shifting of resources nonetheless may exact temporarily a price in un­
employment,

In New England it is only in recent years that the decline of

the textile industry has been offset by the emergence of the electronic
and other new industries.
Healthy growth of the economy can be attained only by a close
gearing of bank credit expansion with that of the economy generally.

Such

growth requires that the central banking system provide enough but not too
much money to achieve and maintain balanced growth without inflation.
Recent historical research of the National Bureau of Economic Research
shows that, while growth rates have fluctuated considerably in the short
run, the growth process, if measured by decades, has been remarkably durable.
Except for the decade containing the Great Depression we have had appreci­
able growth during every decade for the last 70 years,

A highly significant

point brought out by this research is that growth was strong during the
period of falling prices which came in the last third of the 19th centuryj
and that growth was rapid during the decade of the 1920's when prices were
fairly stable.

This evidence suggests that price stability and rapid growth

are quite compatible,

The essential point is that per capita growth depends

to a considerable extent on greater productivity.

Productivity, in turn,

depends on the existence of a flexible economic system, one ready to use
advanced technology.


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 9The decision-making process needs guideposts*

It needs to be

governed by some general view as to our ultimate goals; what we think
worth while and are willing to strive for.
permeate the deRision-making process*

National economic objectives

As long as our citizens deal vdth

general objectives, there is very little dispute.

Everyone wants the

country’
s standard of living to continue to rise.

Prosperity and adequate

job opportunities are goals that all agree upon, and so sustainable growth
without inflation is high among our accepted objectives.

Political and

economic freedom are American hallmarks.
The freedom to make private economic decisions is not only con­
sistent with our system of economic and governmental organization; it is
one of the basic human values that we prize.

But freedom can be preserved

only so long as it is accompanied by wisdom and restraint.

Moreover, our

freedom does not include freedom from the consequences of natural economic
law.

Each time we elect to spend, we must figure out how the bill will be

paid.
In homespun language, "There is no such thing as a free lunch,"
Government cannot give to some citizens what it does not take from others,
A nation cannot spend more than it earns through production.

The goods we

enjoy have to be produced by someone's sweat and by someone's saving.
Intemperate and unwise decisions could squander our resources, magnificent
as they are.

But if our decisions are prudent and balanced, and if we

assess correctly our nation’
s capacity to grow and prosper, we should enjoy
the great bounty that it can produce»

It would be tragic if inept finan­

cial husbandry were to injure a future that appears to be so rich in promise
and in hope.


Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis