View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

for release upon delivery
11:15 a.m. DST
Thursday, May 8, 1958




THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF MONETARY POLICY

Address by
A. L. Mills, Jr.
Member, Board of Governors
of the
Federal Reserve System.
at the
38th Annual Conference
National Association of Mutual Savings Banks
Boston, Massachusetts
Thursday, May 8, 1958

THE NATURE AMD SCOPE OF MONETARY POLICY
The best use to make of public finance either to stimulate or to
restrain economic activity will always be a subject of wide debate»

Against

the present background of economic recession, the debate has focused on how
to promote business recovery by bolstering spending.

On the side of Federal

fiscal policy much has been said about the pros and cons of tax redactions
and public works programs to encourage spending.

Much less has been said

about the use of Federal Reserve System monetary policy to sustain and expand
economic activity through its influence on spending.
Generally speaking, consumer spending is considered the most important
of all types of spending because it serves not only to prime our productive
machinery but, in doing so, to set its total output at varying levels that shape
a myriad of subsidiary activities that, in turn, decide the economic state of
the nation.

For consumer spending to perform its economic function at maximum

efficiency, its forces must maintain a proper balance between the kinds of
activities that go with producing and distributing the output of our national
plant and those that center around creating new or improving old plant capacity.
From time to time throughout modern economic history this balance has become
temporarily unsettled whenever plant capacity has been overbuilt in relation
to existing needs.

And when this has happened, the withdrawal of the manpower

previously engaged on its construction has adversely affected consumer spending
and consumer purchasing power.

New sources of spending must then be induced

that will restore the lost consumer purchasing power and redress the balance»
There is some evidence in the current business situation that the
American economy may now be moving through one of these historic economic
cycles resulting from a temporarily overbuilt plant capacity.




It is,

therefore* incumbent on all elements in public and private life to bend their
efforts and exercise their ingenuity in ways that will help round off the
ragged edges in the business situation* and in so doing put in place a firm
foundation on which to build sustainable economic growth«

Because credit is

one of the economic factors whose end result is spending* its proper use for
both public and private purposes is essential to the fulfillment of these aims.
In a free enterprise economy public finance^ in either its fiscal or
monetary aspects,, enters into the individual choice of alternative forms of
credit and the extent of their use by influencing the economic climate in which
credit decisions are made»

For example* consumers are less willing to use their

credit and to go into debt when they are uncertain about their near-term economic
security* and under such conditions the urge of industrialists to set up new
facilities to cater to consumer needs also lessens»

To help achieve an evenly

balanced economy* therefore, requires the adoption of public credit policies
that take practical economic advantage of the relationship between changing con”
sumer attitudes and their effects on commercial and industrial activity»
An explanation of how the kinds of credit policies that are related
to public finance can be used most advantageously in the public interest at a
time of contracting economic activity first calls for a definition of the term
"credit»"

It is fair to say that there are two distinct uses of the term»

The

first has to do with the kind of credit that is represented by loans and invest­
ments that have been made out of the supply of accumulated savings, while the
second has to do with the kind of newly created credit that is generated by the
lending and investing activities of the commercial banking system» Mutual
savings banks5 savings and loan associations^, and insurance companies deal in




- 3 -

the first kind of credit, but the scope of their lending and investment operations
is influenced vastly by the credit-creating activities of the commercial banks.
This is so because there is a ctynaraic force inherent in the creation of commercial
bank credit that affects the tempo of all economic activities in ways that have a
bearing on the supply of savings available for use by the credit-granting insti­
tutions referred to.
It follows in natural sequence that as the lending and investing
activities of these institutions are influenced by the credit-creating activities
of the commercial banks, and as the conduct of commercial banking is influenced
by Federal Reserve System monetary and credit policy actions to regulate the
volume of commercial bank credit, Federal Reserve System monetary and credit
policy, at least remotely, exerts a controlling influence over the use of every
kind of credit.

Realization of how much the ability of consumers to save, or

their willingness to spend, depends on the immense number of business trans­
actions that are financed by commercial bank credit, lights up the far-reaching
economic effects that flow from the power of the Federal Reserve System to
regulate the volume of commercial bank credit through the supply of reserves on
which it is based.
At the Federal level of using public finance to bolster spending,
fiscal policy takes its place by the side of monetary policy as an economic
agent capable of exerting a strong influence on business activity.

La the

realm of fiscal policy, both the tax and debt management functions of the
United States Treasury are of great importance to economic stability and growth.
At the present time, the relationship of fiscal policy and Federal Reserve Sjystem
monetary policy is closest at the point of the debt management functions of the




-

h

-

United States Treasury which, by affecting the conduct of Federal Reserve
System monetary policy, influence not only the lending and investing policies
of the commercial banks but those of the mutual savings banks, savings and
loan associations, and insurance companies.

For example, taking its past

policies as criteria for the future, the Treasury from time to time might be
expected to offer securities calculated to appeal to the investment needs of
the credit-granting institutions that operate through the use of savings.

If,

on such occasions, alternatively attractive investment choices should be avail­
able as between new or outstanding United States Treasury obligations and other
types of public and private obligations (including real estate mortgages cover­
ing residential, commercial, and industrial properties), Federal Reserve monetary
policy can then be employed to exploit the situation for national economic ad­
vantage.

This is so because Federal Reserve System monetary and credit policy

can link the savings based credit-granting activities of mutual savings banks,
savings and loan associations, and insurance companies to those of the commercial
banks so as to help stimulate economic activity when, as now, it is a purpose of
policy to do so.
The actual link is made through the mechanism of the national debt by
virtue of the fact that the supply of bank reserves, through which the Federal
Reserve Ss^stem regulates the volume of commercial bank credit, originates
principally out of transactions in United States Government securities»

More­

over, as the savings based credit-granting institutions, the commercial banks,
and the Federal Reserve Banks are all investors in Government securities, and
as the types of these securities held in their investment portfolios are con­
stant^ changing, the debt management policies of the Treasury are tied into the




potentiality of Federal Reserve System monetary policy to regulate not only the
volume of commercial bank credit, but to influence the investment policies of
the savings based credit-granting institutions to the end of fostering economic
stability and growth*
The record of Federal Reserve System policy actions going back to the
fall of 19^7 offers a practical demonstration of how the scope and influence of
monetary policy can be extended beyond the commercial banking system, on which
it falls primarily, toward secondarily exerting an influence on the investment
and loan decisions of the various other credit-granting institutions that have
been referred to*

Beginning at that time, additional reserves were supplied to

the commercial banks in steadily increasing amounts.

Inasmuch as loan demand

in the economically critical commercial and industrial sector of their lending
had subsided, the commercial banks used some part of the new reserves placed
at their disposal by Federal Reserve System policy actions as the basis for
making customer loans to finance the purchase of new issues of United States
Treasury, municipal, and corporate obligations whose proceeds exerted spending
effects that substituted for those that had originated from previous direct
commercial bank lendings for somewhat comparable purposes.
However, their greatest use has been to support a major expansion
of direct commercial bank investments in outstanding and new issues of United
States Government securities.

Between investing directly in Government

securities and, to a lesser extent, in other types of eligible public and
private fixed-interest obligations, and lending to finance the distribution of
the heavy volume of new security issues coming onto the market, the commercial
banks are contributing massively to the momentum of the kinds of economic




-6activities that have their origins in the acts of spending that flow out of the
proceeds of securities transactions«

The purposes of most of this spending can

be identified with making the physical additions to our school and other public
facilities, and the improvements in our commercial and industrial plants, that
are so necessary to our national well-being and which have beei translated in
the process of their construction into new consumer purchasing power and spend­
ing*
Moreover, where some part of the commercial banks* additional invest­
ments have come out of the diversified portfolios of mutual savings banks,
savings and loan associations, and insurance companies, the result has been to
release savings resources back to these institutions for discretionary invest­
ment use in whatever channels were then considered to be best suited to their
individual needs.

This, in practice, has meant increasing their real estate

mortgage loans and investing in new issues of United States Govérnment, public,
and corporation securities, the proceeds of which have flowed into the spending
stream with beneficial economic effects corresponding to those resulting from
the credit activities of the commercial banks.
It is through the kinds of developments that have been reviewed that
Federal Reserve System monetary policy, by assisting the commercial banks to
expand their loans and investments, at the same time opens new investment
opportunities to the credit-granting institutions operating through the use of
savings and, in combination, forges a link between the financing activities of
both groups that is economically helpful, especially when business conditions
are slack and need stimulation.




-7In considering the broad subject of savings and investment* it goes
without saying that interest rates have a profound influence on investment
decisions, and out of the entire complex of interest rates the discount rate
of the Federal Reserve Banks has a key importance.

This is true not only be­

cause it is the interest rate that governs the cost at which member banks can
borrow from the Federal Reserve Banks,, but because changes in the discount rate
are a significant guide to money market conditions and the direction of Federal
Reserve System monetary policy.

Considering that investment decisions are

framed in part against calculations as to whether interest rates will tend to
become more or less attractive for investment purposes, it follows that a
change in the Federal Reserve Bank discount rate has great significance.

The

reason for this is that where a change in the discount rate brings it into
line with a past movement of other market rates of interest, a kind of official
confirmation is given that the Federal Reserve System recognizes the validity
of the existing interest rate structure both as the product of its own monetary
policy and of market influences.
A change in the discount rate thus acts as a sort of green light to
go ahead with investment actions that otherwise might have been held up pending
clarification of interest rate conditions.

A change in the discount rate can

also be made as a red light to advise investors of some marked shift in economic
conditions which they should pause to consider.

A change in the discount rate

on such occasions generally has the characteristic of leading rather than follow­
ing the market movement of interest rates.

Under all circumstances, it is clear

that Federal Reserve Bank discount rate changes are a decisive factor for making
Federal Reserve System monetary policy effectivea




.0 .
In many ’
¿ays discount rate changes ai-e of greater significance to
the credit-granting institutions employing savings in their operations, and
who invest at long-tarai, than to the connorcial banks ’
.rhccc ir.vostn:cnts are
concentrated at short-term.

Altogether, tuore is little- cuesLion but that

Federal Reserve System monetary policy profoundly influences ohe invostr.iont
policies of mutual savings banks, savings and loan associr.t5.ons,, and insurance
companies, and that influence is registered directly throu2 changes in the
h
Federal Reserve Bank discount rate and indirectly through a derivative influence
on their activities that stems from the effects that monetary policy first has
on the credit-creating activities of the commercial banks«
The thread of this discussion has been '»oven into the background of
economic recession and has concentrated on the part that Federal Reserve System
monetary policy can play in fostering economic growth and stability»

The theme

has been developed that a broad use of all forms of credit exerts a strong in­
fluence over economic activity and that monetary policy is a great force in
determining the credit actions of all of the major financial institutions that
deal in one form of credit or another.
Although the use of credit for stimulating economic activity lay at
the heart of this discussion, we must not forgot that only a short time ago it
«as deemed advisable to aim Federal Reserve System Monetary policy at restrict­
ing the scansion of credit in order to mitigate the unatabilissing economic
effects that arise from its too extensive use.

The thought that remains from

studying the* effects of wide fluctuations ia the volume of credit is that
Federal Reserve System monetary and credit policy can exert a helpful, but
not conclusive, influence over the u«os to which creilit is pub.




The factor

-9that in the long run will always determine whether credit will be used to
social and economic advantage is the human equation.
our own masters over the use of credit.

Essentially we are

It is up to us to determine whether

it shall be used constructively or recklessly, and we stand to win the re­
wards or to reap the whirlwind of our own decisions.