View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

S

I L V

E

R ,

" T h e ascendency of the Democialic party after thirty-two years of retirement,
having upon its banner the motto Mown with Amer can industries,' as in 1861 the
motto upon its escutcheon was *down with the American Union,' is the cause of
our trouble."

S P E E C H

OF

HON. SETH L. MILLIKEN,
OF

MAINE,

IN THE

HOUSE OF




REPRESENTATIVES,

THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 1893,

WASHINGTON;

1893.




SPEECH
OF

H O N .

S E T H

L.

M I L L I K E

N.

The House having under consideration the bill (H. R.l) to repeal a part of an
act, appr >ved July 14, 1890, entitled " An act directing the purchase of silver
bullion and the issue of Treasury notes thereon, and for other purposes"—

Mr. MILLIKEN said:
*Mr. SPEAKER: In the great uncertainty which prevails some
things are clear. In the first place, we know that we are at sea
on the currency question and tlie still more important question
of what laws are to be enacted to affect the industries and labor
of our people.
It is very clear, too, that whatever we do should be done
promptly. The country can not afford to wait. The present
suspense is more damaging than will be even the enactment of
bad laws. If there has ever been a time since the war for the
suppression of the rebellion when all who desire the welfare of
the people and the nation's prosperity were called upon to act at
once and Earnestly, that time is the present moment.
It is a time when every worthy citizen of the Republic will lay
aside prejudice and selfishness and combine with his fellowcitizens, of whatsoever gparty or creed» to effect the common
weal.
The occasion is too serious for trifling. It is patriotism and
not politics that we want now.
While the ship of state is tumbling and pounding about, with
torn sails and shattdred spars, in a storm that every hour thickens and grows more threatening, portending irreparable disaster, we can not afford to contend for position or be concerned
about the ultimate effect of our action upon persons and parties.
The storm is upon us now. It will be quite time when we shall
have sailed safely otrt of it to discuss ulterior political results.
[Applause.]
The deplorable condition of the business of the country has
been cle irly stated by the President, and is acknowledged by all
men of all p irties. Indeed, it is too keenly felt, and the pinch^
ing fingers of distress make their impressions too painful to escape the sensation of the people.
•The urgent, p iramount question is, what is the remedy? Is
there any remedy at all? If there be any, certainly every good
citizen desires that it shall be promptly applied. He who would
falter now or allow any personal or partisan consideration to
stand in the way of a return of that prosperity to the industries
and labor of our countrymen which they possessed and rejoiced in
219
3




4

prior to the 8th day of last November, should be branded as an
enemy to his fellow-citizens and his race. [Applause^]
But there are almost as many doctors as there are people; and
the remedies which they prescribe are as varied as their different diagnoses of the disease.
I am sure that we could all agree upon the remedy to be administered if we could agree upon the cause of the malady.
Our sound-money Democrats, as they call themselves, and as
perhaps they should be called, arraign the Sherman silver law
as the root of the great evil which just now oppresses the country.
They say that this law,which provides that the Government shall
purchase 4,500,000 ounces of silver monthly, has destroyed faith
in our currency abroad, in our financial credit, and the honor
of the nation.
The question arises, why did not the Sherman silver law have
this effect when it was enacted? Is it not an anomaly that this
law should be enacted without disturbing our prosperous condition! and continue to be the law for three years without perceptibly affecting our welfare at home or our credit abroad, and now
all at once precipitate the ruin of our credit abroad and an unprecedented disaster to our industries at home? Why, at this
late day, after this law has been so long the law of the land,
should "it suddenly, and almost as with a lightning stroke, destroy the confidence of our people so completely that money is
withdrawn from circulation, the banks are depleted of currency
and driven into bankruptcy or suspension, the business of manufactories curtailed or, destroyed, labor thrown out of employment, and idleness, poverty, and distress made to surround us on
every hand. More banks have shut their doors and suspended
business within ninety days than during the entire,twenty-eight
years of Republican administration.
Is it because a Dempcratic Secretary of the Treasury temporarily determined to pay silver certificates in silver and not in
gold, as had theretofore been done; or does some other cause
lie at the root of all this fearful disaster which to-day oppresses
the country and causes the apprehension of greater disaster in
the future?
Let us be above partisanship in this fearful crisis, but let us be
honest with ourselves and others.
If we are afraid to search for the real cause of our present trouble, lest in doing that we shall discover that we are searching
for what we do not wish to find, then we shall surely be in no
condition to administer the right remedy. If we blindly console
ourselves that it is only a pimple upon the body politic, and
refuse to investigate lest we find it a cancer, and apply the remedy for a pimple2 then the cancer, whose existence we refuse to
recognize, will kill while we are doctoring for the simple pimple.
That the purchasing clause of the Sherman silver law should
be promptly repealed, unconditionally repealed, I do not entertain a doubt. It did not express the conviction and best judgment <of Senator SHERMAN and avast majority of the Republican party. It was a tub thrown to the shark of free coinage of
silver. In that respect it did its work. It saved us from the
free-coinage bill which had passed the Senate by a decided majority of the Democratic votes in that body, and threatened to
219




5

pass this House by an equally great percentage of the Democratic votes here.
The difficulty with the free-silver advocates is that they attempt what it is impossible to do—that is, to fix and hold a price
upon silver much above its market velue and very much above
what it costs to produce it.
That may be done, to be sure, to the extent of the subsidiary
currency for our own people. We do it with nickel. We did it
with cooper, and we know we can do it with silver. Actual
facts which no ingenuity of argument can overcome convinces
us of this.
But when we alone attempt to make silver, at a price far above
its market value and the cost of its production a medium of excli nge between ourselves and othsr nations, we attempt a
tisk which both reason and experience teach us that we can not
perform.
No one can blame our silver producers for desiring to sell their
product at the highest price possible; and, as an American citizen to whom the prosperity of all Americans is dear, I should feel
it the duty of the Government to so legislate as to give to our
silver producers the best possible price for their product so i-s to
keep their mines open and their workmen in the mines at work
and well remunerated, if this could be done without harm to our
country. But they ask what not only can not be done, but what
an attempt by the Government to do can result in only disastrous
failure.
For that section of our country where the debtor class wishes
a, cheap currency in which to pay off their debts—no, not to pay
them, but to discharge them by a nominal but really partiRl payment—I have not so much respect. But, still I can have the
charity to say that they only exhibit that degree of selfishness
which is too largely found in all mankind.
. .
I have spoken of the advocates oi: the free-coinage of silver.
Well, Mr. Speaker, the contest is squarely between them and
the advocates of a gold basis; for however strong a bimet?.llist
you or I may be, if we are not in favor of the free coinage of sil-,
ver we are not in favor of its coinage at all, beyond a sufficient
amount for a subsidiary currency, except in some way, to make
it the equal of gold to the holder of it.
The Sherman law really do: s not enter into the contest. We
all beliave it should be repealed. The actual question of contention is whether that law shall be supplanted by an act providing for the free coinage of silver in some shape, or shall it be
unconditionally repealed.
Now, I believe in a bimetallic currency, and because I believe
we shall soonest get to it by an unconditional repeal of the purchasing clause of the Sherman law, 1 shall vote for the repeal.
If this shall bring us to a gold standard, then we shall have gold
enough to do business, or no one will have it.
W e shall get our share of the money of the world, whatever it
be, whether gold, silver, or paper; lor when we consider our
vast and varied resources, and the capability of our people to
produce, we can, if we shall legislate wisely, keep the balance
of trade most always in our favor, and that will give us our share
of the money of the world, and more.
219




6
Then if it be found that there is not sufficient gold for a circulating medium, the stringency will not be with us so much as
with others; and England, with the oLher commercial nations,
will be driven to agree with us upon some ratio of value between
gold and silver.
^ That is what all bimetallists desire. For the commercial nations of the world can as easily establish a ratio b3tween the two
metals and maintain it as we do with our subsidiary coin, and
this they will do when they shall learn thit they can not—any
one of them—corner the gold of the world, and can not do business with more than their share of it.
Indeed, it was because the balance of trade has been against
us—that, more than anything else, has ssnt our gold abroad. The
gentleman from Nebraska [Mr. BRYAN] says it is not the Sherman
law that has caused our trouble. He says we have been recently
selling our products abroad, and therefore gold his begun to
come baclt to us.
This is truej but it is not good Democratic doctrine. We have
been all along taught by our free-trade Democracy that prosperity lies in buying more than we sell. It is a balance oi imports over exports, which they have been crying out for, and
which they propose to legislate for so soon as they can get at our
tariff laws.
The good sense of my friend from Nebraska [Mr. BRYAN] got
ahead of his political faith for once, at least, and he was right.
Indeed I incline to believe, I have so much faith in him parsonally, that he will always be right when he forgets his partisan
fallacies.
Mr. Speaker, you and I know that we are best off when we
produce and sell more than we buy, when we earn more than we
expend. This is universally acknowledged to be true of individuals. Then is it not equally true of that aggregation of individuals which makes a nation? Is not this great people, as
surely as any one of them, growing rich when the income from
their products and earnings is larger than their expenditures;
and is not that policy wisest for us which enhances the one and
diminishes the other?
I have never locked with gratification upon large importations
into our»country and small exports from it. But as it would give
me satisfaction to see my individual income increase and my expenditures grow smaller, so do I look upon large exports from
our country with smaller purchases by our people from abroad.
The money of the world will go where it is most needed. It
will be most needed where production is most abundant and the
largest purchases are made.
And how shall we stimulate our production to its utmost limit?
W e can do it only by protecting the labor of our people by wholesome laws from unrestricted competition with the products of the
pauper labor of other nations; and we can not do that except
by protecting the industries in which our working people are
engaged and by which they live. [Applause on the Republican
side.]
This the Republican party has done for the last thirty-two
years, and in that time we have seen the nation grow in wealth
and power, in comforts of life for the people, in progress in every
219




7

desirable line as it had never grown before, as no other country
has grown since the dawn of history.
The gentleman from Nebraska says. " Let us apply the remedy
to the disease." I heartily indorse his proposition. Indesd, unless we do apply the remedy to the disease the patient will never
be cured.
You may repeal the Sherman law and so do some good, a very
little good. You may thus inspire confidence in thos3 who think
the Sherman law the cause of our trouble. But the most diseased part will not b 3 reached by that remedy. [Applause on
the Republican side.]
Mr. Speaker, never in the history of mankind has a people
enjoyed "a greater prosperity, with a brighter promise of prosperity in the future, than our people enjoyed the day before
President Cleveland anil a Democratic House and Senate were
elected in November last. Every industry in our country was
in a healthy and flourishing condition. Our mills and tactories
were all running on full time. Our merchants were having large
orders for their goo^is, with sure and quick payments; our
farmers were getting good returns fo? their crops. The mechanic's hammer was heard in all our cities and villages and
towns making improvements. The laborer was everywhere
getting full employment and receiving larger remuneration for
his toil than ever before in this or any other country. Idleness
was banished from our land, and with it its consequent poverty.
Only the sick, the infants, the very old, and the lazy were unemployed.
Tne Democratic party was elected to full power in the Government for the first time in thirty-two years, and paralysis of
business in all departments began, It has since continuously
increasea, nntil the entire body, so strong, energetic, and nctive
prior to the last national election, lies prostrated with a malignant and almost, if not quite, incurable malady.
And why should not this be so? That party which thirty-two
yoars ago went out of power in its endeavor to destroy the nation has come back to full control of the Government, threatening to cripple or destroy almost every industry in the land.
Adopting as its platform upon the tariff question,'the provision
of the Confederate constitution upon-that subject, it resolved as
follows*
We denounce Republican protection as a fraud; a robbery of the great majority of the American people for the beneiit of a few. We declare it to be a
fundamental priuciple of the Democratic party that the General Government
has no constitutional power to i*npos3 and collect tariff duties except for the
purpose of revenue only. We denounce the Mckinley tariff law as the culminating atrocity of class legislation.

This isCalhounism in its most concentrated essence. It is the
doctrine of the rebellion. Why should not all this widespread
disaster fall upon the country? It is exactly what Republicans,
in the last campaign, predicted would be the result of a national
Democratic triumph, only it has come quicker and worse than
we foretold.
Many people were simple enough to believe that the Democratic party would fulfill its "roarises to the people. And we
who, judging the future by the past, doubted and believed that
the deplorable condition ox our people would enlighten the mind
£19




8
and dissipate the prejudices of the party in power have been
stunned by a declaration in the President's last message, which
sounds the death knell to the business of the people and the prosperity of our country.
It is a declaration of war upon the nation's industries, to be
commenced as soon as the silver question shall be settled. And
that unfortunate declaration, t iat, so soon as the present question shall bs decided, the attack upon the great law for the protection of the industries of our country and the labor o? our
workingmen shall at once commence, has done more harm than
this Congress can possibly cure, unless it shall declare that during
its life it will not consent to make the attack therein threatened.
Let this House pass the resolution offered by the gentleman
from Ohio [Mr. GR0SVEN0R],0r that which I will present, and a
thousand industries now idle will start up in a week, and thousands upon thousands of idle men will find remunerative employment. Let us resolve that during the lipe of the present
Congress this House will pass no bill which shall repeal or modify
our present tariff laws, nor consent to any measure which shall
revive State banks whose currency shall not be secured by bonds
of unquestionably good character, r This the* House can do without the concurrence of the Senate or the approval of the Executive.
Let us do this and do it at once, and whatever be the action of
Congress upon the Sherman silver law, you will see the nation
arise immediately from its prasent wretched state, be inspired
with confidence and courage, as the Christians were by the
vision of the Monk of Marsailles at Antiofc; and the people, assured
that their enterprises and industries are not to be stricken down
with the bludgeon of free trade, which is now raised menacingly
over their heads, will start up their mills and factories and foundries and furnaces, and workshops of every kind. [Applause
on the Republican side.]
Labor will be employed, idleness and distress will flee, the
farmer will once more see a good market for his products, the
merchant will find liberal and thrifty customers, the mechanic
will resume his vocation, the laborer will find work and a fair
remuneration for his toil, and we shall see all about us and all
over our country the hopeful and happy faces which everywhere
greeted us before the Democratic party had attained ascendancy
in all the branches of the Government, and the specter of free
trade had frightened the people with its terrifying aspect of enmity to their prosperity.
Our banks will become solvent and confident, and active business will bring out their currency to restore old enterprises and
build up new ones. Hands willing to work will become busy
hands, the wealth that there is in labor will again be realized, and by its magic touch our dormant resources will be converted into actual, available value.
But you reply that the McKinley tariff law is still in operation. Yes: but the threat of evil is often as potent to cause
alarm as its actual presence.
When the experienced shipmaster sees the storm coming he
takes in sail. He would be regarded a reckless captain who
would keep all sail on when he sees in the sky the black cloud
which portends the monsoon or the tempest*
219




9

NoticeTOSserved on the country last November by the election of a Democratic President and Congress that the McKinley
law was to be repealed or so amended as to take all the protection out of it. The country has taken notice, and men of all
pursuits have been preparing for the disaster which they saw
awaiting- them. When each one contracts his business, withdraws his money from circulation, reduces his expenditures to
the cost of the bare necessities of life, in order to prepare for
the threatened storm, why then the storm begins. The contraction of business and consumption began to contract the circulation of the currency before the dearth of currency began to
embarrass business. There is quite as much money and as much
to do in the country as there ever has been. The land Is full of
resources and we alth: our people are needlessly forced into
idleness, and men and women are pinched for the necessities of
life in the midst of abundance, and threatened bad legislation is
the sole cause for it.
Our free-coinage Democrats are bewailing the fall of prices.
They assert that gold has appreciated, because it will buy more
than heretofore of the world's products.
They seem to have put a new song into their mouths since the
last national campaign. Then they were all arguing for cheapness. Cheap wool, cheap tin, cheap lumber, cheap iron, cheap
farm products, cheap everything except sugar, rice, and cotton,
was their evening and morning slogan; and when we warned
them that all this meant cheap labor, they did not lessen the
volume of their song nor slacken their efforts to bring about an
era of cheapness in our country.
To get* directly at the cheap products of the pauperized laborers of Europe and x\sia was the goal of their exertions and
desires.
The result of their success in this respect is before the world.
The thousands of the starving and hopeless feel it and know what
it is. And now the free-silver wing of the Democracy say it has
been the appreciatiun of gold which has caused this cheapness
which they deplore.
Was not labor as high in price the day before the last national
election as it ever had been? Was there ever a time when the,
wage earners could get more money or more of the necessities and
comforts of life for their labor than immediately before the 8th
day of last November?
The sound-money wing of the Democratic party assert with
equal positiveness that the purchasing clause of the Sherman
law has been the source of all the mischief from which our people are suffering; and yet both the silver and anti-silver wings
of the Democracy know, or certainly ought to know, that neither
of them give the true cause of our great distress.
Has it been the Sherman law or the proposition to repeal it
that has caused the fall in the price of wool, or lumber, or farm
products, or the earnings of labor?
Our free-silver Democratic friends earnestly and emphatically
declare that the Sherman law has not caused the great depression of our industries, and yet they, equally with the sound money
Democrats, are very cr-reful not to give the true cause of it.
Certainly it has a cauie. Results never come without causes.
219




10
Why do they fear to proclaim the truth? Will it injure their
party? And is their partisan fealty so much stronger than their
desire to relieve their suffering countrymen th it they will spend
their time endeavoring to make a scapegoat of the Sherman silver law, while the condition of the people is every day going
from bad to worse, and the brink of irrecoverable disaster seems
to be only a short way before us?
Some of them say chat the great panic came about naturally.
There is no such thing as a panic without a specific cause, and
there never has been one in this country.
The panic of 1873 was but the reaction from indulgence even
to intoxication in an inflated currency following a great war.
The panic of 1857 was the.culmination of the result of the low
tariff of 1846, for so many years delayed and held in abeyance by
the gold discovery in California and the wars in Europe.
The panic of 1837 was the short, sharp, pinching pain which
followed a wild debauch in crazy speculation. The cause of the
distress and almost universal dis aster during the old Confederation was the practical free trade which succeeded the Revolutionary war. The war had been an embargo upon the importation of English cheap goods. It closed in 1793. ,The embargo
was raised thereby, and free trade brought ruin, as its menace
is doing now.
Yes; all of our panics have had their cause. They never come
spontaneously. This panic has its cause. The ascendency of
the Democratic party, after thirty-two years' retirement, bearing upon it,s banner the motto, 4*Down with American industries," as in 1861 the motto upon its escutcheon was u Down with
the American Union," is the cause, and the only cause, of our
trouble. You may try to hide it under one ingeniously framed
excuse or another, but you can not do it. Like Banquo's ghost,
it will not down at your bidding, and you can not prevent the
people from seeing it in all its hideousness.
Would you arrest the course of the disaster and restore prosperity to our country?
Then join us in passing a resolution that we will not touch our
tariff laws, nor flood the country with wild-cat currency by repealing the tax upon State banks.- Give the national banks the
right to issue bills to the full value of their bonds deposited, and
so bring a return of old-fashioned Republican good times.
Thus, gentlemen, you may do the greatest patriotic duty of
your lives. Thus you may atone, in some measure, for the freetrade votes you have given, the free-trade speeches you have
made, and the mischievous planks in your national platform.
Yes; have the courage to acknowledge the real causes of your
country's suffering; join us and help to remove them.
Do this and the people will forgive you and, perhaps, kill the
fatted calf for you, the thing which you know you want above
all things else.
Will you do it, gentlemen? You may now see the evil fruits of
your free trade, wild-cat currency policy all too plainly to warrant you in hesitating. The wrecks caused by the announcement
of that policy are strewn thickly all about you. The ruin Which
has followed in the wake of your national victory covers the
whole land, and, like a widespread, violent, and virulent plague,
it is bringing misery to almost every household in the country.
219




11

While you stand here inactive, bound hand and foot by your
partisan prejudices, and bending- your knees in worship of the
fetich of free trade and red-do^ money, the wealth of the rich is
melting away, the business of the merchant and manufacturer is
be;ngparalyzed,the farmer's crops are bringing him no adequate
returns, the hum of industry is hushed, there is no sound at the
mechanic's bench: idleness is king, and starvation will soon be
master in the land.
Whoever will take pains to read the history of our country
during the years of the confederation, when we had practical
free tr^de, will find there a picture of our country:s condition
to-day, or what it will grow to be if the present course of ruin is
not arrested. It was free trade and universal disaster; an inflow
of cheap foreign goods and closed stores, factories, and furnaces
at home; an outflow of currency and depletion of money among
our own people; wretchedness and despair until the Constitution
was formed and a protective tariff act was passed by the first
Congress under our present form of Government.
All this is seriously threatened and partially realized now.
Indeed, the people can not live long upon what they have already hoarded. Idleness is a most costly luxury. It has been
stated that the value of labor's productions for one year is greater
than the value of all past accumulations.
Be that as it may, I believe that one year's idleness by all mankind would cause the destruction of at least one-half of the human
race.
We told you last summer and^ autumn that to break down the
walls of protection to American industries and let into our market
the cheap-labor products of all mankind, would either reduce the
wages of labor, or stop our. industries and turn our workingmen
into idleness and consequent poverty and distress.
But you would not heed us. You went on in the way of free
trade and wild-cat banks, and the results are what we predicted.
Now have you the magnanimity to rise out of your political
prejudices and help us to administer the only balm which can
heal the wound which you have made? That is the serious
question of the hour.
The gentleman from Georgia [Mr. LIVINGSTON] and the gentleman from Kansas [Mr. SIMPSON] have told us that this is a
contest between the rich and the poor, the aristocracy and the
plain people. Of course they profess to be very earnestly anxious
to help the plain people, for it is universally known that the
plain people cast vastly more votes than the aristocracy; B(it
really no such contest exists, and rarely, if ever, has existed in
our country, except in the brains of those who want the plain
people's votes. [Applause.]
One good at least has. grown out of the present terrible business ^depression. It is that capital and labor, the banks, the
manufacturers, the merchants, the farmers, and the workingmen, all found themselves in the same boat together. Their interests are mutual and not antagonistic, and no injury can be inflicted upon one class without causing suffering in some degree
to all the others.
The gold bug and the silver bug are subject to the same fortune in common. The financial blow which prostrates one can
219




12
not fail to shake, if indeed, it does not shatter the other. And
it is only the humbug who attempts to make them believe that
they are natural enemies.
It has also demonstrated, what every intjlligent, unprejudiced
man should know, that all sections of our country are parts of
one body, which can be hurt in no part without bringing pain
and injury to every part. These are lessons which can not be
too thcroughly learned and nursed as axioms by our people;
lessons which can not fail to broaden the statesmanship and
strengthen the patriotic spirit of the nation. Indeed, the people have had no more mischievous advisers and the country no
more damaging enemies th*an they who have endeavored to
array one class against another and creats jealousies between
different sections of our country.
To-day the disaster is general. He who talks of a conspiracy
of banks and corporations against the people talks the sheerest
nonsense. It is but the fool's mumbling. It is an assertion that
the banks, manufacturing establishments, and other corporations have entered into a conspiracy to commit suicide for the
pleasure of seeing the plain people suffer and die with themselves. This is absolutely idiotic as well as harmful.
The abstract of the report of the Comptroller of Currency on the condition
of the national banks in the United States, on July 12 last, shows a decrease since May 4 last in individual deposits of $193,000,000; in loans and
discounts of $137,000,000; in specie of $21,000,COO, and in undivided profits of
$13,000,000.

This statement is no worse for the banks than the facts which
exist relative to our railroads, manufactories, and merchants' accounts. Who believes that they, or any of them, have sought
to bring this unfortunate condition upon themselves? It is impossible to believe it, because it is not in the nature of man that
it can be true.
And if, out of the great distress and suffering which is upon
every section and class in our country, shall come a thorough
realization by our people of the interdependence of all men, all
pursuits, and all parts of our land, though the medicine be harsh
and painful to take, the cure may be more than worth the suffering. [Applause.]
What I most fer.r is that the one paramount result of the crisis
will be the reduction of the price of labor. That must certainly
occur if the Democracy shall go on, after we shall have settled
the currency question, to strike down protection to our industries by the vicious tariff legislation with which it threatens
the country. Our factories and furnaces will not always be idle.
Even if free trade shall inundate them with a flood of foreign
cheap-labor products, they will eventually emerge from the deluge, but only by employing our idle and impoverished workingmen at European and Asiatic cheap wages.
The gentleman from Missouri, in his earnest, impassioned appeal for free coinage, said:
Will you trample down the interests of your own people and destroy the
value of one of the precious metals, simply to gratify the greed of Wall
street—a mere agent of Lombard street? It can not, it shall not be done. [Applause.] Any body or any party who undertakes to do it will, in God^s
name, be trampled—as it ought to be—in the dusc of condemnation now and
in the future. - [Continued applause on the floor and galleries.]
319




13
I speak as a Democrat, but yet as an American above Democracy. [Cheers.]
W e do not intend that any party shall survive, if we can help it, that will
lay its confiscating hand on America in the interest of England or Europe.
Now you can take the choice of sustaining America against England, of sustaining American industries and American laborers against English industries and English laborers, or of our going apart.

That was an eloquent, a touching appeal, a splendid expression
of patriotic feeling. But will the gentleman and his friends be
equally patriotic when his party shall attempt to lay its freetrade " confiscating hand upon America in the intarest of England"? When his party shall endeavor to carry out its threat,
that it will " trample down the interests " and dignity of American laborj and destroy or greatly reduce its value in our labor
market,'' simply to gratify the greed " of foreign manufacturers,
will he then as earnestly appeal for their protection? Will he
then "sustain America, American industries, and American,
laborers against English industries and English laborers
Is not their value as great and their interests as sacred as the
value of " one of the precious metals," and the interests of the
millionaires who produce and own them? We shall see when
we come to try that question whether he and his free-silver
Democratic associates will,vote to sustain American industries
and American laborers against English industries and English
laborers, or cast their votes to throw down the bars which for
thirty-two years the Republican party has kept up in order to
keep the products of cheap English labor from competing: with
the products of American workingmen- in our own splendid
American markets. [Applause on the Republican side.]
The gentleman from Georgia [Mr. TURNER] said, in his vigorous speech yesterday, that the banks, the manufacturers, and
the people, as well as Congress, should do something to alleviate the general dist-ess. Indeed, what have they not done, and
what has Congress done? The banks have extended their accommodations quite as far as they have been warranted in doing.
The manufactories have been operating at a loss, and have shut
down their mills only when absolute ruin has stared them in the
face; and the people who ask for work that their families may
eat have up to the pres3nt moment shown a self-control that5
should make us proud of our countrymen, while we gain new
confidence in the permanency of our country.
If, when rebel hands were raised to break the nation into fragments, and send this great home and fortress of freedom down in
night andflamesto everlasting death, true he arts were gladdened
and the hopes of patriotic men were inspired by the grand spectacle of rallying millions hastening to the perilous battle-front
to die or live, as in God's purpose it might be, for the preservation of the Union, h irdly less has our faith in the perpetuity of our
institutions been strengthened by the wise moderation, patient
forbearance, and earnest effort to find someway to prosrerityon
the part of men of all conditions and callings, a.nd especially the
plain people, who suffer the most and have most to fear from the
menace of free trade and bad currency. [Applause.] W h y s t m d
we here worse than idle? Who among vs holds the helm of state
now? Is it ignorance, partisan prejudice, or indifference to the
situation that is in command?
Gentlemen of the Democratic party, you are in command. You
219




14

have the Sanate, the House, and the President. You alone have
the power to enact laws. The great army cf American workers
and voters are looking to you for some legislation which shall relieve them from the situation in which your unfortunate policy has
placed them. Y o u have done nothing yet to give them even one
note of encouragement. All is as uncertain and more distressing than when the President called Congress together. How
long shall a suffering people wait to catch some ray of hope from
you? Will you not lift the gloom from those who are so courageously facing the storm and fighting away despair?
- Is there no commanding soul, no guiding spirit among you, to
inspire you with patriotic determination and lead you to wise
and unselfish effort? Will you repeal the purchasing clause of
;the Sherman silver law, empower the national banks to issue bills
equal to the full value of their deposits of Government bonds, and
pass an assuring resolution upon the tariff and wildcat bank
questions?
Unless you do these things, the wind which swept you into power
last November will become the tornado that shall hurl you from
political ascendancy forever. If in this dire emergency you fail
to fulfill your trust no one will be foun'd to trust you again. [Applause.]
219




O