View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

At

serve

a regular meeting of the Federal

Re-

Board held in the office of the Board at 11:00

a. m., on Monday, November 22,
PRE3ENT:
Ir. McAdoo, presiding

Mr. Williams

1::r. Hamlin

Mr. Warburg

Mr. Delano

Mr. Harding

Mr. Miller
Mr.

secretary.

X
The minutes of the meeting of November 19,
were read and approved.
The minutes of the joint conference between the Board and the 1xecutive Committee representlnr; Governors of reserve banks were presented
by the secretary and on motion referred to Mr. Warburg and :r. Liner for report.
On motion an application for Federal reserve notes for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(New Orleans Branch) amountin,7 to :::500,000 duly
reconuended by the Committee on Issue and Redemption
were approved as follows:




1008




.s5 denomination
10
LO

020,000
120,000
160,000

A shipment.of notes to the frubtreasury at
2ew Orleans.amountinF; to 01,000,000, the same to be
held in stock at that point, was authorized.
By unanimous consent other business was
deferred, and lir. Delano as chairman of the con-nittee '
on redistricting submitted another report on the subject.
r. Hamlin moved that the report be received
by the Board and on being put the quest iou prevailed.
LIr. Hamlin moved that the opinion of specia4.
Counsel J. P. Cotton re1atin€7 to the powers of the
Board in redistricting be formally laid before the
Board.

The motion was seconded by Mr. Warburg and

on being put to a .vote prevailed.
Mr. McAdoo stated that he had received late
on Saturday afternoon, the 20th instant, copy of an
opinion by special Counsel J. P. Cotton, upholding
the power of the Board to reduce the Federal Reserve
Districts; that he had had no prvious notice that

1009

such an opinion had been requested and as the redistricting question had been put upon the calendar for today he had assumed that the Board intended to act upon it finally; that as the question was one of grave ilq-)ortance he had felt that
the Board ought not to take action without having
the opinion of the Attorney General of the United
States as to its powers in the premises; that in
the early part of the preceding week he had requested the Attorney General to examine into the
question with a view to furnishing him, as a member and chairman of the Board, an opinion upon the
Board's power; that upon receipt of Er. Cotton's
Opinion he had concluded that it would be better
if the Governor of the Board should request the
President to ask the opinion of the Attorney General because he (Mr. McAdoo) was a member of the
Organization Committee and for that reason he preferred not to make the request.

He, therefore,

had suTested to Governor Hamlin that he reQuest
the President to ask for such an opinion.




1010




Hamlin thertalpon read a letter he
had written to the President of the United States
asking for the submission of the question to the
Attorney General and the reply of the President,
enclosing the opinion referred to, the said opinion expressing the view that the Board was without power to reduce the number of Reserve Districts.
Mr. Hamlin moved that the opinion be formally laid before the Board and copied for distribution to all members.

The motion prevailed.

Delano stated that he had not supposed
that the Governor, as Governor, had the power to go
to the President and ask for an opinion of the Attorney General without a vote of the 3oard authorininc him to do
Er. McAdoo stated that he thought that any
member of the 3oard was at liberty to ask the President to request an opinion of the Attorney General
without a vote of the Board, and that it rested within the discretion of the President to comply or not
with such a request.

hr. McAdoo stated that he

Ion

thought the power of any member of the Board to
make such.a request of the President should not
1?e denied.
Er. Mier inquired whether Er. 7amlin
had acted on his own motion or otherwise.
Er. 7amlin said that he had acted on his
own authority.
r.Tilliams stated that, although he knew
nothirr; of the opinion requested of the Attorney
General nntil this morning, he considered that the
Governor had been thorou7h17 justified in making of
the President the request he did for the Attorney
General's opinion, in view of the emorcmncy which
had developed as a result of the Camdttee's report,
and which, in his opinion, threatened the success
and inteiTity of the Federal Reserve System.

He

stated that when the Committee made its report on
the 15th instant, he had clearly understood from
the discussion which promptly followed that the Committee insisted upon immediate consideration and
definite and final action within the ensuing




few




Mr. Williams then reminded the Committee
that Mr. Delano had stated at the meeting of the
15th that unless the subject should be taken up;
considered and acted upon within the few days
next ensuing, that it would probably have to be
deferred until December 11, in order to have a
Pull meetinc; of the Board, and this delay Mr.
Delano had strongly objected to.

Mr. Williams

asked Mr. Delano if it had not been his intention and expectation to have the subject definitely acted upon before the 11th proximo.

Mr. Delano

said that that had been his expectation.
:Ir. Williams moved that a stenographic
relert of the discussion, and of all other discussions relating to redistricting be proveded by the
Board.
Mr. Delano opposed the motion, saying
that he thought no one meeting or subject was more
Lnportant than any other, and held that .none should
receive more attention than any other.
Mr. LicAdoo favored, the proposal.

Yr. Thrburg expressed the view that such
a report should be taken at all meetings of the
Board or never.
Mr. Harding suggested that Mr. Williams
modify his motion so that a stenographic report
should be provided on the present occasion and 11_ on any future occasion at the request of two momboo of the Board.
Del:,o said he .esired to record once
more the reason for his position against this pro_ —al, saying that the records should be kept always or not at all.
Mr. Miller took the view that the members
would not be able to express their thoughts so frankly
and freely if stenographically reported so that the
result of the keeping of such a record would be to
bring about meetings of a parliamentary and stereotyped variety with the real deliberations taking
place outside of the Beard room, of which he be lieved there already was too much.




Lfter further discussion the motion was

It)14.




withdrawn.
1.:r. Hamlin, by request, read the main
coL/clusions of the Attorney General's opinion with
reference to the powers of the Board in regard to
redistricting.

Mr. Delano called attention to the

fact that in the past the Attorney General had declined to furnish opinions to the Board, and asked
whether the opinion now offered was written by the
Attorney General himself or by a subordinate.

Mr.

Hamlin replied that he had no lmowledge on this subject but that it was signed by the Attorney General.
hr. Harding called attention to the point
which had been made during the hearin.n;s of the redistricting appeals, to the effect that members of
the Organization Committee should. properly have no
vote in decidinr: such appeals.

No action was taken

with reference to the point thus made.
Thrburg was formally recognized.

He

expressed regret at what had occurred during the
meeting.

The events of the day had damaged the

Board, in his opinion, more than anything which had

191

Het occurred in its history.

He thought the Gov-

ernor had no right to address the President, as
Governor, without authority from the :Board. There
had been unseemly haste in the whole matter. The
attitude adopted by those who had thus hastened
to secure the Attorney General's opinion, sue;gested the thought that the Board had intended to do
something of an ill-considered nature.

The whole

procedure must have implied that there was to be a
snap judgment.

This had Nsrepresented the Board.

Er. McAdoo said he could explain the
w.dole matter.

He had thought that after the meet-

ing of November 15, definite action was to be had
at this meeting (November 22).

He had then sup-

plied the Attorney General with all the data in
his possession, saying that he wanted an opinion
by.this meeting.

The Attorney General had then

taken the matter under consideration.

When the

opinion of Er. J. P. Cotton was received he
thouht it was better that the Governor of the
Board should sak the President for an opinion be-




T:1) 111




cause he (Mr. McAdoo) had been a member of the Organization Comnittee.

This made it possible to

got an opinion today, and explained the fact that
the data had been in the hands of the Attorney Ge
erol before Mr. Hamlin's letter was written.
1,:r. Warburg replied all this did not alter the fact that the Board had not.authorized the
request for an opinion.

He wished to add that

there had never been any intention of cutting short
discussion or acting hastily.

On the question of

legal authority he thought the inquiry had placed
the Caziittee in an unfortunate position.
Er. Williams called attention to the fact
that Mr. Elliott, as long ago as lost spring, had
filed on opinion in which he took a position adverse to the possession of this power by the Board.
Continuing, Mr. Warburg said he was unwilling to be described to others as one who was
ready to act without having the law on his side.
The Committee had merely reported certain facts
and conclusions it had arrived .at.

He, himself,

wan definitely of the opinion that those who favored a reduction in number were not conteplatinc
anythinc to the detriment but to the credit of the
2ederal aeserve aystem while those who refused to
have such action considered were, in his opinion,
hurting the system.

Ho thought the Connittee re-

port ought not to have been sent to any outsiders.
The Committee had never agreed on any specific
plan of redistricting.
Board ought

Pprther, he thought the

discuss very seriously the question

haw far the nets or resolutions of the Board are
binding upon all its members and how far the Governor of the Board is authori7.ed to act without
instructions from the Board on such questions as
he may deem best.
Mr. Delano said the harm in the incident
lay in the fret that the Governor had not made it
clear to tho President that his act was not that
of the Governor of the Board but that of an individual.




Er. Harlin called attention to the fact




that that was exactly what he had done and re-read
his letter to the President in which he asked for
an opinion an behalf of himself as a member, as
well as Governor of the Board.
Er. McAdoo said he thour;ht the discussion
haw the opinion was obtained was not material.

The

object was to get at the merits of the question. He,
however, thought that every member of the Board had
the right to appeal to the President if he desired.
Er. Warburg said that in former cases a
definite plan had been followed.
State banks

He cited the

mapbershir case when the opinion of

the Attorney General had not been asked because it
was thono,ht it might bind the Board's hands.
1:r. Harding incluired whether the Attorney General's opinion did not prevent action.
Er. McAdoo said that it did not in express terms prohibit the contemplated action but
tended to make it difficult by pointing out its
illecality.
-larburg referred to the fact that

1 a forner occasion when the question of neutrality had. been raised, he had desired to put the subject before the Attorney Gen,,r:-1 but had felt that
he had no right to do so.

Tle wished to odd that

he had sincerely thought until very recently that
the lecretory of the Treasury was favorable to the
idea of redistricting, aud possibly reducing the
number of bank.

Ho therefore felt surprised at

the attitude which was now adopted.
EcAdeo expressed surprise that Er.

•

Thrburg should think that he was in favor
districting.

of

re-

He said that he was or-nosed to

a reduction in the number of districts and thought
it would be exceedingly unwise, although he had
never objected to a consideration of a re-adjustnent of the linos of the district as they had
been laid out by the urganization Committee.
On motion the Board r7ronted authorit7
to affect settlehient in the (old

of

the current week instead of T

day bein




holiday.

on Prid
-

1020




On motion at 1-00 p. in. the Board adjourned to moet nt 3:00

p. m. this

aff

day.

Secretary.

OhaI man.