View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW
OF
B U S IN E S S

C O N D IT IO N S

JOHN PERRIN, Chairman of the Board and Federal Reserve Agent
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Vol. IX

San Francisco, California, July 20, 1925

No. 7

SU M M A R Y OF N A T IO N A L CONDITIONS
Production of basic commodities, and factory
employment declined further in June, while
railway freight shipments and the volume of
wholesale trade increased. Wholesale prices,
after declining for two months, advanced.
Production. Production in basic industries,
as indicated by the Federal Reserve Board’s
index, declined about 1 per cent in June to the
lowest level since the autumn of 1924 but was
17 per cent above the low point of last summer.
Output of pig iron, steel ingots, lumber, news­
print, and petroleum, and mill consumption of
cotton declined in June, while production of
bituminous coal, sole leather, and wheat flour
increased. The number of automobiles manu­
factured was slightly less during June than in
May. Factory employment declined 1 per cent
and factory payrolls over 2 per cent between
May 15th and June 15th, reflecting substantial
declines in the automobile, boot and shoe, tex­
tile, and iron and steel industries. Building
contracts awarded during June were larger in
value than during May and almost equaled the
peak figure for April. In square feet of floor
space, the June awards were a little smaller
than those for May. Residential contracts in
June were the smallest for any month since
PER

CENT

PER

P rodu ction in B a sic Industries — Index of 22 basic commodities corrected
for seasonal variation ( 1 9 1 9 = 1 0 0 ) .




February, 1925, but greatly exceeded those of a
year ago. The Department of Agriculture
estimate of the condition of all crops combined
on July 1st showed some improvement from
the month before. The corn crop forecast places
that crop at approximately 550,000,000 bushels
above last year. The July 15th cotton crop
estimate was 13,588,000 bales, compared with
a forecast of 14,339,000 bales on June 25th.
Trade. Freight car loadings were larger
during June than during May, as is usual at
that season, and also considerably exceeded the
figures for June, 1924, the low point of last
year. Sales at department stores during June
were seasonally smaller than in May, but
totaled 5 per cent more than last year. It
should be borne in mind, however, that in June
of this year there were four Sundays as com­
pared with five in the preceding month as well
as in June, 1924. Mail order sales were 6 per
cent larger than in May and exceeded the
amount reported for June, 1924. Sales of whole­
sale firms were 5 per cent greater than in May
and larger than in any June in the last five
years. Department store stocks were reduced
further in June, but were slightly larger than a
year ago. Wholesale stocks of groceries, shoes,

Latest figure, June, 110.

CENT

W h olesale P rices — Index of U . S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1 91 3 = 100,
base adopted by Bureau).

Latest figure, June, 154.

50

M O N TH LY REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS

and hardware were smaller at the end of June
than a month earlier, but those of dry goods
and drugs were larger. Compared with a year
ago, stocks of groceries and drugs were larger
in value, while stocks of dry goods, shoes, and
hardware were smaller in value.
Prices. Wholesale commodity prices ad­
vanced 1.4 per cent in June, according to the
PER

J u ly , 1925

bank credit for commercial purposes was rela­
tively inactive, and the volume of commercial
loans at reporting member banks remained
near the low level for this year, although con­
siderably above the amount for the correspond­
ing period in 1924. At the reserve banks the
seasonal demand for credit and currency was
reflected in increased borrowing by member

CENT

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS
2

BILLIONS OP D O L L A R S

2

i

Earning Assets

1
Discounts!

L

Acceptanc

U SSec^ — ^

1922

J

^

1923

aV
4

es

1924-

1925

R eserve B ank C re d it — W e e k ly figures for 12 Federal Reserve Banks,

F a ctory E m ploym ent and P ayrolls — Indexes for 45 manufacturing indus­

Latest figures, July 22

tries ( 1 9 1 9 = 1 0 0 ) . Latest figures, June, employment, 9 4 ; payrolls 105.

index of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, fol­
lowing declines in April and May. The largest
increase for any commodity group was for the
miscellaneous group, which includes crude
rubber. Prices of farm products, foods, and fuel
and lighting also advanced, while prices of
building materials declined considerably. In
the first half of July, quotations on flour, beef,
hogs, wool, copper, petroleum, hides, and rub­
ber increased, while prices of sugar, bituminous
coal, and hardwood lumber declined.
Bank Credit. At member banks in leading
cities the volume of loans on securities con­
tinued to increase after the middle of June, and
during the first half of July was at a higher
level than at any previous time. Demand for

banks which carried discounts at the beginning
of July to the highest level in more than a year,
and notwithstanding the subsequent decline
the total on July 22nd was still at a relatively
high level. Total earning assets on that date
showed little change as compared with the
figures for four weeks earlier. Firmness in the
money market at the close of the fiscal year was
followed by an easing of money after the first
week of July. In the latter part of July there
was again evidence of firmer money conditions.
These changes were reflected chiefly in the
movement of rates for call money, quoted rates
on prime commercial paper and on bankers’ ac­
ceptances remaining at 3 ^ -4 per cent and 3 %
per cent, respectively, throughout the period.

T W E L F T H FED ER AL RESERVE DISTRICT CONDITIONS
June, 1925 H
com pared w ith
June,
M ay,
1924
1925
15.7
6 .6

Statistical Summary—
June,
1925

M ay,
1925

June,
1924

M ay,
1924

Bank Debits— 21 cities*.............................. $2,751,302 $2,582,108 $2,377,461 $2,460,179
Bank Debits— Index Number,sf— 20 cities.......
140
136
121
130
Building Permits— 20 cities........................ $39,072,852 $38,841,828 $28,197,633 $31,909,015
147
145
135
143
Retail Sales— 32 stores— Index Numbersf.......
Savings Deposits— 71 banks*....................... $1,125,843 $1,096,785 $1,004,472
$983,092
Lumber Production— 4 associations— board feet*
728,185
698,816
616,664
721,496
Petroleum Production^— California— barrels....
642,938
607,107
626,933
639,793
Flour Production— 16 companies— barrels.......
276,315
231,456
470,108
421,961
Reporting Member Bank Loans and Discounts§* $1,114,272 $1,099,927 $1,013,853 $1,018,830
Reporting Member Bank Deposits§*............ $1,559,639
$1,540,496 $1,364,638 $1,350,483
Federal Reserve Bank Discounts||*...............
$37,939
$39,288
$22,408
$32,739
Federal Reserve Bank Reserve Ratio||...........
75.9
74.4
83.2
81.4
* I n th ou sa n d s. t A d ju s t e d f o r se a s o n a l v a r ia tio n s — 1919 m o n th ly a v e r a g e = 1 0 0 . $ D a ily a v e r a g e p r o d u c t io n .
§J u ly 8, Ju n e 10, 1925, a n d J u ly 9 and J u n e 11, 1924. ||July 15, Ju n e 17, 1925, an d J u ly 16 an d J u n e 18, 1924.
1 iP ercen tage in cre a s e o r d e c r e a s e ( — ).




15.7
38.6
8.9

2.9

12 .1

2 .6

18.1

4.2
5.9
19.4
1.3

2 .6

— 41.2
9.9
14.3
69.3
—

8 .8

0 .6

1.4

1 .2

- 3.4
2 .0

July, 1925

Agricultural Activities
Early harvest reports have tended to confirm
previous forecasts of satisfactory yields of the
principal crops of the Twelfth Federal Reserve
District. Weather conditions continued gener­
ally favorable during June and early July,
although grain crops in the Pacific Northwest
and fruit crops in the interior valleys of Cali­
fornia were damaged slightly by hot, dry winds
during the last week of June.
The grain harvest is now in progress in most
sections of the district. July 1st forecasts of
the Department of Agriculture indicated a total
district production of all w h ea t amounting to
100.374.000 bushels. This is 43.2 per cent more
wheat than was produced in the district last
year, but is 11.7 per cent below the five-year
average production of 1919-1923, a period
which excludes the unusually small crop of 1924
but includes the record yield of 1923 (141,367,000 bushels). The district’s 1925 barley crop is
estimated at 46,607,000 bushels, compared with
19.270.000 bushels produced in 1924 and the
1919-1923 average yield of 39,395,000 bushels.
In California the forecasted yield of 29,882,000
bushels compares with 10,080,000 bushels pro­
duced in that state in 1924, and the 1919-1923
average of 30,503,000 bushels.
The California rice crop has made excellent
progress during the past six weeks. Its condi­
tion was estimated at 92 per cent of normal on
July 1st, wThich compares with a ten-year aver­
age condition of 89 per cent on that date. Ap­
proximately 108,000 acres have been planted to
rice in California this year, compared with
88.000 acres in 1924. Estimated production is
14.3 per cent less than the five-year average
(1919-1923) yield. Total district and United
States production figures for all wheat, barley,
and rice follow (000 omitted) :
/— A ll W h e a t— n ,------B a r le y -------^ ,---------R i c e ----------*
F o re ca st
F o re ca st
F orecast
July 1, A ctu a l
J u ly l, A ctu al
July 1, A ctu al
1925
1924
1925
1924
1925
1924
(bushels) (bu sh els) (bushels)
T w e lft h

U n ite d

51

FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT AT SAN FRANCISCO

(bushels) (bushels)

(bushels)

D is t r ic t 100,374 70,077 46,607
19,270 6,309* 4,497*
S t a t e s .. 680,000 873,000 208,475 187,875 38,066 33,956

^ C a liforn ia o n ly .

Spring and summer planting of field crops
has been completed and prospective yields are
uniformly larger than were the yields of 1 9 2 4 .
Comparative figures for beans, cotton, potatoes,
and sugar beets in this district and in the
United States follow (000 omitted) :
1924
235
1,376

U nit
bu .
bu.

,— P rodu ction — \
F o re ca st A ctu al
July 1,1925
1924
4,597
3,630
16,768
13,327

310
41,360

b a le s
b a le s

. ..
13,588§

227
3,662

bu.
bu.

35,101
349,566

31,508
454,184

230
925

to n
to n

1,883
6,195

1,620
7,513

r~ A cre a g e
B eans:
1925
^ T w e lfth D is t r ic t . .
302
U n ite d S ta te s .......... 1,584
C o tto n :
t T w e lft h D is t r ic t . .
333
U n ite d S t a t e s ..........46,448
P ota toes:
T w e lft h D is t r ic t . . .
230
U n ite d S t a t e s .......... 3,453
Sugar B e e ts :
J T w e lfth D is t r ic t . .
209
U n ite d S t a t e s ..........
776

* A r iz o n a , C a lifo rn ia , and I d a h o .
^ C a lifo rn ia , I d a h o , and U ta h .
§ Ju ly 15th e stim ate.

186
13,619

f A r iz o n a and C a lifo rn ia .

Production of important deciduous fruit and
nut crops of the Twelfth District will also be
larger this year than in 1 9 2 4 , according to pres­
ent estimates. Shipments of fresh deciduous
fruits, excepting cherries, from California and
from the Pacific Northwest have been slightly
larger in volume thus far in the present season
than in the corresponding period of the 1 9 2 4
season. Condition and yield figures of import­
ant horticultural crops (except apples) in Cali­
fornia, and of apple production in the Twelfth
District and in the United States follow:
t------------ C o n d it io n --------------^
t---------July 1 st----------\
10-Year J u n e l,
1924 A v era ge 1925
62
70
56
65
70
63
65
61
49
74
90
88
79
..
92
74
. .
90
70
. .
86
55
74
86
72
84
80
68
78
73
73
62
81
66
76
68
76
84
92
81
80
88

1925
A lm o n d s .......... 56
A p r ic o t s .......... 64
C h erries ........... 50
G ra p es .............. 87
W in e ...................
T a b l e ....................
R a is in .................
O liv e s ............... 79
P e a ch e s ........... 80
P e a rs ................. 74
P lu m s ............... 78
P r u n e s .............. 60
W a ln u ts .......... 96
O ra n g e s .......... 88
L e m o n s ............ 81
78
82
82
A p p le s
T w e lft h D is ­
t r ic t ...............................................................
U n ite d States 57.7
65.4
61.8
66.4
*B ox es.

,------------Y i e l d -------------\
F orecast A ctu al
July 1,1925
1924
(tons)
(tons)
...
9,200
147,000
137,000
11,000
13,000
2,180,000
1,550,000
398,000
350,000
456,000
300,000
1,326,000
900,000
...
5,500
392,000
320,000
148,000
133,000
64,000
39,000
...
115,000
32,000
21,500
...
24,100,000*
...
6,732,000 *
4 0 ,2 5 7 ,0 0 0 t 3 2 ,1 8 4 ,0 0 0 f
8 7 ,6 9 0 ,0 0 0 t 8 5 ,7 6 1 ,0 0 0 t

t C o m m e r c ia l c r o p in b o x e s .

(A ) Agricultural Marketing Activity—
t------ E x p o r t s --------\--- t----------------C a rlot S h ip m e n ts ----------- L iv e s to c k R eceip ts
W heat*
Barley* A p p le s* T otal
at Eight M arkets in 12th D istrict
Portland and
San
12th D e cid u o u s O ra n gesf L e m o n s f
C a ttle
Puget Sound F ra n cis co D ist.
Fruits£
C a lif.
C a lif.
and
M on th ly
(1000 bu.) (1000 bu.) (cars)
(cars)
(cars)
(cars)
C a lves
H ogs
Sheep
Ju n e, 1 9 2 5 .......................................
302
605
147
2,420
3,367
1,801
94,021
178,636
248,031
M a y , 1 9 2 5 .......................................
0
840
604
370
4,427
1,820
86,334
140,557
362,181
J u n e— 5 -year a v e r a g e ...............
1,808
498
92$
2,600
4,482
1,809
86,913
150,705
254,054
t------------------------------- C r o p Y e a r ------------------------------- >
16,784
8,442
38,133
2,807 30,216
7,984
(2 3 .6 )
(4 1 .3 )
(8 2 .9 )
(7 3 .0 )
(6 9 .4 )
T o J u n e 30, 1 9 2 4 ........................ 31,989
10,575
58,415
2,816 35,857
9,354
(2 2 .2 )
(2 2 .9 )
(8 8 .9 )
(6 8 .7 )
(6 7 .2 )
F iv e -y e a r a v e r a g e to J u n e 30. 25,520
11,195
46,215$
2,665
32,529
7,446
________
(2 2 .2 )
(2 6 .8 )
(8 6 .5 )
(7 3 .7 )
(6 8 .2 )
C u m u lative
T o J u n e 30, 1 9 2 5 ........................

F ig u r e s in p a re n th e se s in d ica te p e r c e n t a g e o f n e w c r o p o n ly .
$ T h r e e -y e a r a v e ra g e . § C a lifo rn ia — e x c lu d in g a p p le s. S e a s o n
||At en d o f m o n th . flF o u r -y e a r a v e ra g e .




f------------ C alend ar Y e a r --------------N
607,999
1,253,430
1,381,287
592,119

1,398,866

1,407,935

528,258

1,048,857

1,423,311

* S e a s o n b e g in s J u ly 1st. fS e a s o n b e g in s N o v e m b e r 1st.
b e g in s M a y 1st. J u n e fig u re s to J u n e 28th.

Cold Storage Holdings 11
12th D istrict
Butter Eggs
(1000
(1000
lbs.)
cases)
3,345
521
1,612
429
4,301
55911

52

M ON TH LY REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS

Weather conditions during the past six
weeks have been generally favorable to the live­
stock industry, present supplies of feed are ade­
quate, and herds and flocks are in satisfactory
condition. Wool shearing has been completed
in this district, and preliminary commercial
estimates indicate a total clip of 90,000,000
pounds, compared with 86,956,000 pounds pro­
duced in 1924. Growers have already sold a
large proportion of the 1925 clip at prices rang­
ing from 30 to 53 cents per pound, compared
with 33 to 47 cents per pound received for the
clip of 1924. Estimates of the proportion of the
clip sold by July 1, 1925, range from 30 to 85
per cent in different sheep raising sections,
compared with estimates ranging from 50 to 85
per cent of the 1924 clip sold by July 1, 1924.
Agricultural marketing trends, as indicated
by comparative figures of the movement of
certain of the district’s important crops, figures
of market receipts of livestock, and of cold
storage holdings of butter and eggs, are shown
in Table “A ,” page 51.

J u ly , 1925

and Stockton, California, and in Portland, Ore­
gon. During the first six months of 1925, the
value of building permits issued in the 20
selected cities was larger than during any half
year of record, exceeding the previous peak
figures of the last six months of 1923 by 6.4
per cent.
B U I L D I N G P E R M I T S I N 20 C I T I E S
Per Cent Increase or Decrease (— )

M o n th s in 1925 com pared
with sam e M o n th s in
,----------------------- 1924----------------------- ^
M on th ly
Y e a r-to -d a te
N o.
V a lu e
N o.
V a lu e
J u n e -----8.4
38.6
— 3.8
11.2
M a y -----0.9
21.7
— 5.8
6.7
A p ril . . . ~~ 2.3
20.4
— 7.3
3.3
M a r c h . . — 2.5
2.2
— 9.0
— 2.3
F e b ru a r y . — 18.0
— 4.5
— 12.7
— 4.9
J an u ary . — 7.1
— 5.3
— 7.1
— 5.3

M o n th in 1925
com pared with
p recedin g
M o n th
N o.
V a lu e
— 2.2
0.6
— 6.6
— 8.6
3.4
— 8.6
32.0
23.2
— 7.2
3.8
21.2
— 0.05

MILLIONS OF D O L L A R S

Industrial Activity
Seasonal activity in industry has been re­
ported during recent weeks, and figures of em­
ployment and production indicate that indus­
trial output was slightly larger in volume
during June, 1925, than during June, 1924. In­
crease in number of workers employed in the
district’s principal industries during June was
in excess of the normal seasonal increase.
Figures of employment in California and Ore­
gon are shown in Table “ C.”
Volume of building construction has con­
tinued near record levels. June figures o£ value
of building permits in 20 principal cities showed
a smaller than seasonal increase as compared
with figures for May, but were 38.6 per cent
larger than the figures for June a year ago. The
latter increase was the result, chiefly, of large
increases in value of building authorized in
Berkeley, Fresno, Los Angeles, Sacramento,

(B ) Building Permits—
N o.
B e r k e le y ................
B o is e .......................
F r e s n o .....................
L o n g B e a ch .........
L o s A n g e le s .........
O a k la n d ................. . .
O g d e n .....................
P a sa d en a ..............
P h o e n ix .................
P o r t la n d ................. , .
R e n o ........................
S a c r a m e n to ..........
S alt L a k e C ity . . .
S a n D ie g o .............
S an F r a n c is c o . . .
S a n J o s e .................
S ea ttle .....................
S p o k a n e .................
S t o c k t o n ................
T a c o m a ..................
D is t r ic t




382
50
92
337
1,187
29
271
78
1,148
36
274
150
626
902
86
909
216
94

.............. . . 10,813

June, 1925
V a lu e

N o.

June, 1924
V a lu e

$ 1,265,175
43,982
518,730
1,077,900
15,305,516
2,766,419
182,550
919,357
169,026
4,772,020
91,445
1,131,976
565,697
1,294,130
4,661,024
330,830
2,168,230
424,255
710,900
673,690

243
56
68
416
3,387
936
30
247
61
1,159
18
235
167
480
856
78
898
217
94
332

$

568,516
40,712
64,013
1,515,232
10,292,542
2,527,008
82,200
628,146
100,000
2,344,290
63,750
509,410
561,245
1,524,490
3,899,374
198,135
2,094,350
236,970
276,555
670,695

$39,072,852

9,978

$28,197,633

V a lu e o f B u ilding Perm its — T e n C ities
_______

(Bi-M onthly Averages)

* N o v e m b e r -D e c e m b e r , 1920, a v e r a g e $9,700,000.
t J a n u a r y -F e b r u a r y , 1921, a v e r a g e $8,500,000.
F o r fu rth e r e x p la n a tio n an d list o f c itie s in c lu d e d in fig u re s p r e ­
se n te d in th is ch a rt see n o t e to ch a r t o n p a g e 21 o f M a r c h ,
1925, R e v ie w .

The United States Bureau of Labor Statis­
tics’ index number of building materials prices
stood at 171 (1913 prices— 100) for June, 1925,
compared with 174 for May, 1925, and 173 for
June, 1924.
Production of lumber was larger by 4.2 per
cent during June, 1925, than during May, 1925,
a partly seasonal increase. As in May, report­
ing lumber mills of the district cut more lum­
ber than they sold, but for the first six months
of 1925 their reports show that production was
slightly less than sales and shipments. Recent
increases in demand for lumber are reflected in
June figures of orders received and shipments
made which were 3.8 per cent and 2.7 per cent
larger, respectively, than in May.
L U M B E R A C T IV IT Y *
June,
M ay,
June,
r- F i r s t Six M o n th s—'»
1925
1925
1924
1925
1924
(boardfeet) (board feet) (boardfeet) (board feet)

P r o d u c t io n . . . .
S h ip m e n ts ____
O rd e rs ...............
U n fille d O rd e rs
N o . o f M ills
R e p o r t in g . .

728,185
709,928
704,322
433,153

698,816
691,408
678,792
475,854

616,664
563,344
542,677
337,113

176

177

187

3 ,8 28,344
3,899,662
3,863,746
180t

(board feet)

3,806,180
3,780,881
3,561,072
197f

* A s r e p o r te d b y fo u r a s s o c ia tio n s , 000 o m itte d e x c e p t in ca s e o f
n u m b e r o f m ills r e p o r tin g .
t A v e r a g e o f first s ix m o n th s .

July, 1925

National production of non-ferrous metals,
except copper, a considerable proportion of
which is mined in this district, was smaller
during June, 1925, than in May, 1925, but larger
than in June, 1924.
N O N -F E R R O U S M E T A L S —N ational Produ ction
June, 1925
M ay, 1925
June, 1924
C o p p e r ( lb s .) (m in e p r o ­
d u c t io n ) .................................. 140,644,000
139,514,000
126,948,000
S ilv e r ( o z .) (c o m m e r c ia l
5,328,000
5,423,000
5,228,000
b a r s ) ......................................
Z in c ( t o n s ) ( s l a b ) ..............
45,920
49,738
43,442
F ig u r e s fo r lead are n o t av ailable

Reported daily average production of petro­
leum in California during June, 1925, was
642,938 barrels, a figure 2.6 per cent larger than
that reported for June, 1924, and 5.9 per cent
larger than the figure for May, 1925. Indicated
average daily consumption increased 11.1 per
cent during June as compared with May, but
continued less than production, and stored
stocks advanced to new high levels (110,966,791 barrels on June 30, 1925).
P E T R O L E U M — C a liforn ia
Indicated
A v era ge
A v era ge
D aily
C on su m ption
D aily
P rodu ction (Shipm ents)
1925.
1925.
1923*
1924.

.
.
.
.

N um ber
O pened

(barrels)

(barrels)

567,714
510,774
$
$

642,938
607,107
858,750
626,933

r - N e w W ells
D aily
P ro d u c ­
tion

Stored
S to ck s at
End o f
M on th

(barrels)

(barrels)

Ju n e,
M ay,
S e p t.,
Ju n e,

53

FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT AT SAN FRANCISCO

119
78
93
88

110,966,791
108,710,090
$
9 5 ,0 3 0 ,7 7 7 t

* P e a k o f p r o d u c t io n .
fO c to b e r,
fig u res n o t av a ila b le .

1924,

s to c k s .

73,150
52,440
139,960
37,209

$ C o m p a r a b le

Greater than seasonal increases in flour mill­
ing activity reported during June were the
consequence of unusual inactivity during May
rather than of a broad improvement in the de­
mand for flour. Output of reporting mills
during each of the past four months (MarchJune) has been smaller than in the same
months of any year since 1921, when this bank

began keeping the record. Stocks of wheat and
flour held by the mills have been allowed to de­
cline during recent months. A t the end of June,
their stocks of wheat w’ ere 48.1 per cent and of
flour 19.7 per cent below the five-year average
(1920-1924) holdings on June 30th.
F L O U R M IL L IN G *

O u tp u t ( b b l s . ) . . .
S tock sf
F lo u r ( b b l s . ) . . .
W heat
(b u .)...

June, 1925

M ay , 1925

276,313

231,456

470,108

356,838$

361,597
743,885

411,850
920,309

361,780
1,632,835

450,118
1,433,569

* A s r e p o r te d b y 16 c o m p a n ie s .
in g m o n th . $1921-1925.

June, 1924

F iv e -Y e a r
A v era ge
June,
(1920-1924)

t A s o f the first d a y o f the f o ll o w ­

During June and the first three weeks of July,
fruit canning and packing plants of the district,
particularly in California, became generally
active. Commercial estimates indicate that
1925 production of both canned and dried fruits
will be larger in California, and slightly smaller
in Oregon and W ashington, than the 1924 out­
put, changes in the size of the pack reflecting
similar changes in size of canning and drying
fruit crops in each state. Markets for both
canned and dried fruits have been relatively
active during recent months, and fruit packing
factors are entering upon the 1925 season with
smaller carryover stocks than have been held
in the years since 1920.

General Business and Trade
General business activity in the district
during June was maintained at approximately
the same level as in March, April, and May, a
level well below the peak of February but still
slightly above estimated normal. For the first
six months of 1925 the business record gener­
ally shows an increase in activity as compared
IN D E X

NUMBERS

( C) E m ploym ent—
C aliforniia ----/— ------ O regon
N o . of
N o. of
N o.
<— E m ployees
N o . ^— E m ployees —>
June,
M ay ,
June,
M ay,
of
of
F irm s
1925
1925
1925
F irm s 1925

Industries

148,185
(1 .7 )

145,643

120

20,805
(2 .7 )

20,255

57

7,838
( — 1.7)

7,976

5

276
(2 .2 )

270

119

28,328
(1 .3 )
2,367
( — 2 .5 )

27,975

51
5

16,821
( — 1.2)
817
( — 12.9)

17,033

2,427

7,017
( — 5.4)

7,416

9

569
(1 .8 )

559

26,449
(5 .2 )

25,137

41

1,879
(7 5 .3 )

1,072

5

10,316
(2 .5 )
63,527
(2 .1 )
14
2,343
( — 2 .7 )

10,061

O th e r In d u s trie s* . 315

62,242

A ll I n d u s t r ie s ........... 737
S to n e , C la y and
G lass P r o d u c t s .
L u m b e r an d W o o d
M a n u fa ctu re s ..

14
C lo th in g , M illin e ry
an d L a u n d e rin g .
F o o d , B e v e ra g e s
an d T o b a c c o . . .
W a te r , L ig h t
and P o w e r . . . .

M is c e lla n e o u s

....

64
149

2,409

9

443
(1 5 .7 )

938

B ank D e b its — T w elfth D istrict

383

* I n c lu d e s th e fo llo w in g in d u stries : m etals : m a ch in e ry and co n v e y a n ce s ; lea th er and r u b b e r g o o d s ; ch e m ica ls, o ils and

paints ; printing and paper goods.




Index for 20 principal cities, figures for Phoenix, Arizona, not included, (1 91 9
monthly a v e ra g e = 1 0 0 ). Latest figures, June, with adjustment, 1 40 ;
without adjustment, 141.

with the first six months of 1924, and the
amount of the increase was greater than that
which might be attributed to normal annual
growth of business in the district.
This bank’s index of bank debits, which re­
flects changes in business activity, advanced

54

July, 1925

M ON TH LY REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS

from 136 (1919 monthly average=100) in May,
1925, to 140 in June, 1925, due allowance being
made for normal seasonal variation in the
figures as reported by banks in 20 principal
financial centers. In June, 1924, the index stood
at 121, the apparent increase of 15.7 per cent
over the year period being approximately twice
the estimated normal annual rate of growth for
the district.
The retail trade index, based upon sales of
32 department stores in seven principal cities
of the district, declined 9.2 per cent during
June, 1925, as compared with May, 1925. The
decrease was less than that which normally
occurs at this season of the year and the index,
when adjusted for normal seasonal movements,
advanced from 145 (1919 monthly a verage=
100) in May, 1925, to 147 in June, 1925. In
June, 1924, it stood at 135. During January and
February, 1925, sales of reporting stores were
smaller in value than in January and February,
INDEX NUMBERS

1924, but since the first two months of the year
their sales have been larger in value than in
the corresponding months a year ago. Total
value of sales for the first six months of 1925
exceeded total value of sales for the first six
months of 1924 by 2.2 per cent.
D E P A R T M E N T S T O R E S A L E S - I n d e x N u m bers
(1919 M onthly A v e r a g e = 1 0 0 )

W ithout Seasonal A d justm ent
O ak­
land

L os
A n geles

100
130
118
113
130
125
110
129
133
143
143

Jun e,
1919. .
93
Ju n e,
1920. . 129
Jun e,
1921. . 133
Ju n e,
1922. . 144
1923. . 176
Ju n e,
1924. . 176
Ju n e,
F e b .,
1925. . 173
M a r c h , 1925. . 215
A p ril,
1925. . 218
M ay,
1925. . 203
Ju n e,
1925. . 194

San
F ra n ­
c is c o

Salt
Lake
C ity

Seattle

85
105
97
101
108
109
104
132
135
148
120

94
113
109
102
115
107
80
98
110
124
106

102
125
116
122
130
131
136
133
141
135
143

91
110
105
99
111
103
112
107
117
108
103

S po­
kane

D is ­
trict*

90
100
86
91
101
95
73
95
98
102
98

84
138
105
101
106
82
73
77
92
85
85

90
115
108
112
128
125
115
143
147
149
136

90
100
87
91
101
95
114
102
104
104
98

83
136
104
99
104
81
106
91
95
86
84

97
125
117
122
139
135
150
147
152
145
147

W ith Seasonal A d justm ent
Ju n e,
Jun e,
Jun e,
Jun e,
Jun e,
Jun e,
F e b .,
M a rch ,
A p ril,
M ay,
Jun e,

1 9 1 9 ..
1920. .
1921. .
1922. .
1923. .
1924. .
1925. .
1925. .
1925. .
1925. .
1925. .

100
139
143
155
190
190
213
223
232
221
209

'

100
130
117
113
130
124
146
138
137
154
143

*32 s to re s.

D epartm ent Store Sales — T w elfth D istrict
Index of 32 Stores in 7 cities (1 91 9 monthly averag;e= 100). Latest figures,
June, with adjustment, 1 4 7 ; without adjustment, 136.

(D ) Bank Debits*—
June,
1925
B e r k e l e y ............ ,$
B o is e ..................
F r e s n o ..............
L o n g B e a ch . .
L o s A n g e le s . . .
O a k la n d ............
O g d e n .................
P a sa d en a ..........
P h o e n ix ............
P o r tla n d ...........
R e n o ....................
S a c r a m e n to . . .
S alt L a k e C ity .
San D ieg o . . . .
San F r a n c is c o . .
S an J o s e ..........
S eattle ...............
S p o k a n e ............
S t o c k t o n ...........
T a c o m a ............
Y a k i m a ...............
T otal

............

*000 o m itte d .




16,682
12,613
28,479
43,812
787,260
1 33,867

June,
1924

950,044
22,468
2 07 ,924
53,432
24,443
48,004
12,245

17,450
11,436
26,426
46,851
700,255
106,513
19,750
28,811
21,062
149,469
8,057
36,029
62,923
48,195
777,716
19,255
179,757
47,274
20,638
40,792
8,802

$2,751,302

$2,377,461

21,700
33,408
22,721
165,202
9,568
35,423
65,989

56,018

$

Six M onths
1925
1924
$

108,808
66,507
169,656
285,543
4,719,470
815,739
137,223
217,541
140,598

147,499
262,438
69,325

107,446
65,402
179,915
337,339
4,642,565
744,794
136,721
210,090
126,517
951,757
48,522
272,064
375,022
292,046
4,842,328
123,324
1,070,839
281,861
137,938
247,196
57,669

$16,180,745

$15,251,355

931,179
48,868
225,365
404 ,234
318,917
5,517,040
138,873
1,158,147

297,775

$

Trade at wholesale during June, as reflected
in reports received by this bank from 190 firms
in eleven lines of business, was considerably
more active than a year ago, and relatively
more active than in previous months of the
present year. Compared with sales during
June, 1924, the June, 1925, sales of these firms
showed an increase of 13.8 per cent, value of
sales in all lines, except groceries, being greater
than a year ago. This is by far the largest in­
crease reported in any month of this year as
compared with the corresponding month of
1924, the figure for May being 5.2 per cent and
for April and March, less than 2 per cent.
During the first six months of 1925, total sales
of reporting firms were 2.5 per cent larger in
value than during the first six months of 1924.
W H OLESALE TRADE
Percentage increase or decrease (— )
■■ in V a lu e o f Sales
.... — ^
January 1June, 1925 June, 1925 M a y , 1925 June 30,1925
com pared
com pared
com pared
com pared
w ith
with
with
w ith J a n .lJune, 1924
M a y , 1925 M a y , 1924 June30,1924
r —-----

N o . of
F irm s
A g r ic u ltu r a l
Im p le m e n ts . . 21
A u to m o b ile
S u p p lie s . . . 18
A u to m o b ile .
, 22
6
D r y G o o d s „ . . 16
E le c t r ic a l
S u p p lie s . . . 8
F u rn itu r e . . . . 18
G ro c e r ie s . . . . 26
H a r d w a re . . •. 20
. 12
S ta tio n e r y . . . 23

60.7

38.6

23.6

2.2

4.0

5.3

—

3.6

53.4
8.6
1.6

—

45.1
11.2
6.9

87.8
13.8
5.4
5.8
6.6
— 4.6
4.6
6.7
5.8

—
—
—

37.5
1.9
3.9

4.0
1.6
6.0
— 0.8
7.7
— 0.2

—

— 3.5
— 3.3
— 1.3
— 2.9
— 12.2
0.4

21.4

1.3
— 4.3
— 2.6
— 4.2
— 10.1
— 1.3

July, 1925

On June 30, 1925, savings deposits at 71
banks in seven principal cities of this district
were 12.1 per cent and 2.6 per cent larger, re­
spectively, than on June 30, 1924, and May 31,
1925.
S A V IN G S A C C O U N T S

June
N u m ber
of
30.
B anks
1925*
L o s A n g e le s . . 13
$382,933
O a k la n d f ..........
7
97,457
P o r t la n d
..........
9
54,158
S a lt L a k e C ity 8
29,963
S an F r a n c is c o . 14
467,796
S ea ttle ............... 14
73,750
6
S p o k a n e ............
19,786
T ota l

............

55

FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT AT SAN FRANCISCO

M ay
31,
1925*
$373,309
95,201
52,484
29,822
454,625
71,969
19,375

Per C en t increase
o r d ecrease ( — )
June 30.1925,
com pared with
June
June M a y
30,
30,
31,
1925
1924*
1924
$33 0,24 3r 16.0
2.6
90,767r
7.4
2.4
51,012
6.2
3.2
6.0
0.5
28,277
418,444
11.8
2.9
66,756
10.5
2.5
18,973r
4.3
2.1

71 $1,125,843 $1,096,785 $ l,0 0 4 ,4 7 2 r

12.1

2.6

of native beef at Chicago was $11.80 per hun­
dredweight, the highest price level recorded
since the week ending December 4, 1920. The
follow ing table shows the trend of livestock
prices at Chicago during the past twelve
months :
Cattle
N a tiv e B e e f
(1 0 0 lb s.)

1924
.

J u ly

...........................

S e p te m b e r

.............
.

N o v e m b e r .............
D e c e m b e r ...............

w as f o r ­

9 .3 4
9 .4 3
9 .6 4
9 .7 4
1 0 .2 7
9.7 9
9.2 3

H ogs

Sheep

F at L am bs

(1 0 0 lbs.)

( 1 0 0 l b s .)

(1 0 0 lb s.)

$

7 .0 6
7 .8 2
9.2 9
9 .5 3
1 0 .1 0
8 .9 6
9 .5 5

$ 5 .3 4
5 .7 3
6 .5 6
6 .0 5
6.3 3
6 .8 0
7.8 2

$ 1 4 .6 5
1 3 .7 6
1 3 .5 0
1 3 .3 5
1 3 .4 0
1 3 .9 0
1 6 .2 1

1 0 .4 0
1 1 .0 9
1 3 .6 1
1 2 .8 4
1 2 .0 0
1 2 .5 0

9 .0 4
8 .4 8
8 .8 8
7 .5 0
7 .2 6
6 .7 4

1 8 .1 0
1 7 .4 9
1 6 .2 1
14 .0 2
1 3 .7 2
1 4 .8 9

1925
F e b ru a r y

................
.

*000 om itte d , f ln c l u d e s o n e b a n k in B e r k e le y w h ich
m e rly a b ra n ch o f an O a k la n d b a n k , r— R e v is e d .

$

A p r il

........................
,

9 .1 3
9.3 5
1 0 .2 1
1 0 .2 5
1 0 .0 4
1 0 .6 5

Prices

Increase June, 1925
over June, 1924.

The trend of prices during the past month has
been upward. The Bureau of Labor Statistics'
index number of prices of 404 commodities
at wholesale (1913 prices=100) increased from
155 for May, the low point thus far in 1925,
to 157 for June. This increase was the first
advance in the index since March, 1925, when,
at 161, it stood at the highest point reached in
the past three years. The Department of A gri­
culture’s index number of farm prices of 30
agricultural commodities (1909-1913 average=
100) increased from 146 in May to 147 in June,
1925. The index of farmers’ purchasing power,
which is based upon the ratio between the farm
price index and the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
wholesale price index of non-agricultural com ­
modities, remained at 90 (1913 purchasing
pow er=100) during June. This is the same
figure as was reported for April and May, 1925,
but is 1.6 per cent below the figure (91.5) re­
ported for March, 1925, when the index stood
at the highest point reached since June, 1920.
Prices of cattle, hogs, and lambs advanced
during June and the first half of July. For the
week ending July 15th the weekly average price

On July 15, 1925, wheat for September de­
livery was quoted at $1.50% to $1.54^4 Per
bushel at Chicago, an average advance of 12
cents per bushel over quotations on July 2nd,
but a decline of approximately 13 cents per
bushel from the quotations of June 5th, when
the price of September contract wheat reached
the highest levels since trading in this future
was resumed in June, 1921. Spot prices of
shipping barley at San Francisco have ad­
vanced during the past three months, the price
range during June and the first three weeks of
July being $1.75 to $1.85 per cental ($0.84 to
$0.89 per bushel), compared with $1.55 to $1.60
per cental ($0.74 to $0.77 per bushel) during the
first half of April, 1925. During the June and
July period a year ago, quoted prices on spot
barley ranged from $1.80 to $2.50 per cental
($0.86 to $1.34 per bushel), and the grain sub­
sequently sold at $2.75 to $2.90 per cental
($1.32 to $1.39 per bushel), prices which pre­
vailed from September 23rd to December 8,
1924.
Opening prices of the more important Cali­
fornia canned fruits in 1925 and 1924 and spot

1 4 .0 %

7 7 .2 %

2 6 .2 %

1 .6 %

(E) Commodity Prices—
C om m o d ity
W h o le s a le P r ic e s ( U . S. B u re a u o f L a b o r ) 1913— 1 0 0 ....................................
P u r c h a s in g P o w e r o f F a rm P r o d u c t s (U . S. D e p a r tm e n t o f A g r ic u lt u r e ) *
C a ttle (N a t iv e B e e f ) ,. W e e k ly a v e r a g e p r ic e at C h ic a g o ....................................
H o g s ............................. .W e e k ly a v e ra g e p r ice at C h ic a g o ....................................
L a m b s ........................... .W e e k ly a v e ra g e p r ice at C h ic a g o ....................................
W h e a t ..............................C h ic a g o c o n tr a c t p r ice fo r S e p te m b e r w h e a t............
C o t t o n ............................. M id d lin g U p la n d s — W e e k ly ra n g e o f s p o t q u o t a ­
tio n s at N e w O r le a n s ..........................................................
S u g a r ............................. .B e e t G ra n u la te d f. o . b . S an F r a n c i s c o ........................
. C h o ic e in 25-lb. b o x e s , f. o. b. C a lifo r n ia ...................
D r ie d A p r ic o t s
.S iz e 4 0 /5 0 in 25 -lb . b o x e s , f. o. b. C a lifo r n ia ............
R a is in s .............................L o o s e M u s c a te l— 2 c r o w n — in 2 5-lb. b o x e s , f. o. b.
S an F r a n c is c o .......................................................................
W o o l ............................. ..A v e r a g e o f 98 q u o ta tio n s at B o s t o n .............................
C o p p e r .......................... .E le c t r o ly t ic , m o n th ly a v e ra g e at N e w Y o r k ..............
L e a d .............................. . M o n t h ly a v e r a g e at N e w Y o r k ......................................
S ilv e r ............................ . M o n th ly a v e ra g e at N e w Y o r k ......................................
Z in c ............................... .M o n t h ly a v e r a g e at St. L o u i s ...........................................
L u m b e r ( S o f t w o o d ) .,.W e e k ly I n d e x , U . S . $ ............................................................

U nit

100 lbs.
100 lbs.
100 lbs.
bu.
lb .
lb .
lb.
lb .
lb.
lb .
lb .
lb .
oz.
lb.

July 3,1925

O n e M o n th A g o

O ne Y ear A g o

157
90
$11.75
13.20
15.85
1 .3 8 ^ -1 .4 1 Yz

155
90
$10.40
12.05
13.00
1 .6 3 ^ -1 -6 7 ^

144.6
82
$9.30
6.90
14.20
1 .1 5 3 4 -1 .1 7 ^

2 2 .9 0 -2 4 .1 5 0
5.700
. 1 6 J 4 - .1 6 ^ t
.08 J4-.0824

2 3 .6 0 -2 4 .6 0 0
5.700
N o t Q u o te d
.0 8 J 4 -.0 8 M

2 8 .3 5 -2 9 .3 5 0
7.100
.1354
.1054

•07^§
79.180
13.3990
8.3210
69.1060
6.9900
29.73

.0 7 ^
73.480
13.3470
7.9850
67.5800
6.9510
30.52

.0734
73.280
12.3270
7.0200
66.6900
5.7920
29.31

* R a tio o f farm p r ice s (A u g u s t , 1909-July, 1 9 1 4 = 1 0 0 ) t o w h o le s a le p r ice s o f n o n -a g r ic u ltu r a l c o m m o d itie s ( 1 9 1 0 -1 9 1 4 = 1 0 0 ).
f 1925 c r o p p r ice s . $ A s p u b lis h e d b y the “ L u m b e r M a n u fa c tu r e r and D e a le r .”
§J u ly 14, 1925.




56

prices on July 20, 1925, and July 24, 1924, are
given in the follow ing ta b le :
C h o ic e G ra d e
O pening P rices*
N o . 2 /a C ans
1925
1924
A p r ic o t s .......................................
2.40
2.45
C h erries, R. A .............................
3.45
2.85
P lu m s , E g g ................................
1.90
1.85
P e a ch e s, Y . C ............................
2.20
2.40
P e a ch e s, Y . F .............................
2.15
2.25
P ea rs, B a rtle tt ........................
3.30
3.00

Spot Prices*
July 20,
July 24,
1925
1924
2.50
2.60
3.50
3.00
2.00
2.00
2.30
2.60
2.15
2.30
3.50
3.25

* F . O . B . C a n n e ry in C a lifo rn ia .

Prices now being paid growers in California
for the chief canning fruits are compared with
prices paid during three previous seasons in
the follow ing table :
N u m ber 1 G ra d e
C a nning F ru it
A p r ic o t s ...........................
C h erries ............................
P e a ch e s, Y . C .................
P e a ch e s , Y . F .................
P e a rs, B a rtle tt ..............

July, 1925

M ON TH LY REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS

1925
(per ton)
$ 5 0 -$ 6 0
160*
35*
25
72f

1924
(per ton)
$ 65
115
45*
25
60

1923
(per ton)
$25—$35
1 90 -20 0
30
25
35

1922
(per ton)
$75 -$ 1 0 0
196
60
45
71.25

on January 7, 1925. Investments of reporting
banks at the beginning of July were larger in
volume than ever before. In general, there has
been little necessity for borrow ing at the R e­
serve Bank during the past half year.
R E P O R T I N G M E M B E R B A N K S — T w elfth D istrict
(Figures are in millions of dollars, numbers in parentheses indicating percentage
changes.)

C on d ition
C h an ge
July 8,
from O n e
1925
M o n th A g o
T o ta l L o a n s ............ 1,114 + 1 4 ( 1.3)
C o m m e r c ia l L o a n s .
864 + 4 ( 0 .4 )
I n v e s tm e n ts ............
454 + 1 ( 0 .3 )
D em a n d D e p o s it s ..
767 + 8 ( 1.1)
T o t a l D e p o s it s ......... 1,559 + 1 9 ( 1.2)
B o r r o w in g s fro m
F e d e ra l R e s e rv e
B a n k ......................
27 + 7 (3 4 .4 )

C h an ge
from Six
M o n th s A g o
+73 (
7 .1 )
+42 (
5 .1 )
+ 18 ( 4 .2 )
— 28 (
3 .5 )
+ 73 ( 4 .9 )

C h ange
from O n e
Y ear A g o
+ 1 0 0 ( 9 .9 )
+ 59 (
7 .3 )
+ 98 ( 2 7 .5 )
+ 36 ( 4 .9 )
+ 1 9 5 ( 14.3)

+ 17 (1 8 1 .2 )

+

16 (1 4 0 .3 )

M IL L IO N S O F D 0 L L A Q S

* G ro w e r s ’ A s s o c ia t io n o ffe r in g p rice .
fC a n n e rs are ch a rg e d a $3.00 se r v ic e fe e in a d d itio n .

Prices of non-ferrous metals, including cop­
per, lead, silver, and zinc, increased during
June and early July. Silver sold for 6 9 ^ cents
per ounce on July 16, 1925, the highest price
paid for this metal since November, 1924.
Copper prices averaged 13.4 cents per pound
during June, continuing the advance begun in
April, 1925. Lead and zinc prices turned up­
ward during the month, after having declined
21.5 per cent and 9.7 per cent, respectively,
during the first five months of the year. The
lumber price index number of the Lumber
Manufacturer and Dealer advanced slightly
from 29.73 on June 10, 1925, to 29.87 on July 10,
1925. On July 10, 1924, it stood at 29.41.

Banking and Credit Situation
Volum e of commercial loans of reporting
member banks in the Twelfth Federal Reserve
District increased slightly ($4,000,000 or 0.4 per
cent) during the four weeks ending July 8,
1925. During the past four months, such loans
have fluctuated at levels slightly above $850,000,000. Collateral loans continued the upward
trend noted since October, 1924, and total
volume of loans, at $1,114,000,000 on July 8,
1925, was the largest ever recorded. Total de­
posits increased by $19,000,000 (1.2 per cent)
during the four weeks period, the increase in
time deposits being slightly greater than the
increase in demand deposits.
A review of banking developments in the
district during the first half of the year 1925
reveals a strong credit situation. Demand de­
posits of reporting member banks declined by
$28,000,000 during the six months period, but
time deposits increased by $107,000,000, or
approximately 2.5 per cent per month. Total
loans of the banks increased by $74,000,000 so
that the ratio of total deposits to total loans
was 140.0 on July 8, 1925, compared with 142.8




M e m b e r B ank C r e d it— T w e lfth D istrict
Figures for 70 member banks in leading cities, as of last W ednesday of
each month. Latest figures, June 2 4.

Changes in the character and amount of re­
serve bank credit in use in the Twelfth Federal
Reserve District during the four weeks ending
July 15, 1925, were not significant. Discounts
at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
increased seasonally at the close of the fiscal
year but later declined, and on July 15, 1925,
were $1,000,000 (3.4 per cent) smaller in volume
than on June 17, 1925. Total earning assets
showed a net decline of $3,000,000 ^2.5 per
cent) during the four weeks, a slight increase
in holdings of United States securities being
offset by a decrease in holdings of purchased
acceptances.
F E D E R A L R E SE R V E B A N K O F SA N F R A N C IS C O
(Figures are in millions of dollars, numbers in parentheses indicating percentage
changes,

C on­
dition
July 15,
1925
100
T o t a l E a r n in g A s s e t s ..........
D is c o u n t s ..................................
38
U n ite d S ta tes S e c u r itie s . .
44
P u rc h a se d A c c e p t a n c e s . . .
18
T o ta l R e s e r v e s ......................
279
T o t a l D e p o s its ......................
166
F e d e ra l R e s e r v e N o te
C ir c u la tio n ...........................
201

C h an ge from
O n e M on th
Ago
— 3 ( 2 .5 )
—
( 3 .4 )
( 5 .8 )
— 4 (1 6 .9 )
+ 13 ( 4 .8 )
( 3 .7 )

1
+ 2
+ 6
+

4 ( 2 .0 )

C h an ge from
O ne Y ear
Ago
+ 2 7 ( 3 6 .4 )
+ 16 ( 6 9 .3 )
— 4 ( 8 .4 )
+ 14 (4 5 5 .9 )
— 24 ( 8 .0 )

+ 8 ( 5.0)

—

5 (

2 .3 )