View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY

REVIEW

BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WILLIAM W. HOXTON, CHAIRMAN AND FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT_________________
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
DISTRICT SUMMARY— Business in the Fifth
Federal reserve district in Ju ly was seasonally in
less volume than in June, and on the whole seems
to have been somewhat below the volume of
business transacted in July a year ago. At the
end of August conditions are quite spotted, with
both favorable and unfavorable factors in evi­
dence. The credit facilities of the Fifth district
are being used much more extensively now than
was the case a year ago, but there was less ex­
pansion in credit demand in Ju ly and the first
half of August than occurs in most years. Pros­
pects for agriculture are good insofar as yields
of most crops are concerned, but the price situ­
ation in cotton, tobacco, and some truck crops
is less satisfactory than a year ago. Tobacco
prices especially are much lower than in 1927.
Tobacco factories are operating full time, but
textile mills are working short hours and dis­
posing of their output with difficulty. Construc­
tion work in the district is in larger volume than
a year ago, but much of it is of a type which
requires relatively few workmen and labor is
not fully employed. B u s i n e s s failures in the
Fifth district in Ju ly were comparatively more
numerous than in the United States as a whole,
and debits totals reported by the banks in lead­
ing trade centers were below those of the cor­
responding period last year. Retail trade in Ju ly
as reflected in department store sales was ap­
proximately 3 per cent larger than the volume
of trade in July 1927, but wholesale trade in most
lines was in smaller amount than a year ago.
In the Carolinas and Virginia crops were more
or less damaged by floods around the middle of
August. In view of poor prices for tobacco, po­
tatoes, peaches, and some other agricultural
products, together with reduced payrolls at tex­
tile mills and the number of idle workers in the
district, the purchasing power of the district is
probably lower this year than it was a year ago,
which may have an unfavorable influence on fall
trade when it opens up in September and Oc­

tober.


AUGUST 31, 1928
RESERVE BANK OPERATIONS— Reserve
bank credit outstanding in the fifth district de­
clined slightly between Ju ly 15th and August
15th this year, although the opening of South
Carolina and some North Carolina tobacco mar­
kets and the marketing of other early agricul­
tural products generally increases the demand
for accommodation at the reserve bank. The
banks in agricultural sections actually increased
their borrowing during the month, but a decline
in rediscount^ for the large city banks resulted
in a net decrease in rediscounts held by the Fed­
eral Reserve Bank of Richmond from $56,678,000
on July 15th to $53,442,000 on August 15th. Total
earning assets of the Richmond bank declined by
about the same amount, falling from $67,301,000
to $64,511,000 between the two dates under re­
view. The circulation of Federal reserve notes
remained practically the same, totaling $53,626,000 on Ju ly 15th and $53,544,000 on August 15th.
Member banks increased their reserve deposits
during the month from $64,871,000 to $67,690,000. The several changes enumerated raised the
cash reserves of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond from $60,055,000 on Ju ly 15th to $64,743,000 on August 15th, and increased the ratio
of cash reserves to note and deposit liabilities
combined from 50.49 per cent to 52.39 per cent.
On August 15, 1927, rediscounts held by the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond totaled only
$20,923,000, in comparison with $53,442,000 held
by the Bank on August 15th this year. Total
earning assets of the Bank a year ago amounted
to $51,487,000, compared with $64,511,000 on
August 15, 1928. The greater spread between re­
discounts and total earning assets last year was
due to much larger holdings of Government se­
curities in 1927, which amounted to approxi­
mately $21,000,000 as compared with $3,000,000
owned this year. Federal Reserve notes in actual
circulation declined from $59,379,000 on August
x9 27 > t0 $53>544>ooo on August 15, 1928, and
member bank reserve deposits dropped from
$7°,1 19,000 to $67,690,000 during the same period.
The cash reserves of the Richmond bank totaled
$88,713,000 a year ago, but declined to $64,743,000 on August 15th this year, and during the
same period the ratio of cash reserves to note
and deposit liabilities combined dropped from
67.02 per cent to 52.39 per cent.

CONDITION OF

SIXTY-FOUR REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES

ITEMS

August 15, 1928

Loans Secured by U. S. Government Obligations.......
Loans Secured by Other Stocks and Bonds..................
All Other Loans and Discounts, Largely Commercial—.
Total Loans and Discounts..............................
Total Investments in Bond and Securities..................
Reserve Balance with Federal Reserve Bank..............
Cash in Vaults....................................................................
Demand Deposits ............................................................
Time Deposits ....................................................................
Borrowed from Federal Reserve Bank..........................

$

July 11, 1928

August 17, 1927

$ 3,226,000
185.233.000
331.059.000
519.518.000
160.465.000
41.865.000
12.809.000
359.792.000
247.798.000
31.337.000

3,197,000
184.363.000
331.284.000
518.844.000
159.790.000
40.285.000
11.129.000
354.805.000
247.503.000
26.842.000

$ 3,425,000
155.138.000
363.830.000
522.393.000
156.891.000
47.098.000
12.738.000
392.817.000
236.082.000
6,601,000

The accompanying1 table shows the principal items of condition of sixty-four regularly reporting
member banks as of three dates, August 15, 1928, July n , 1928, and August 17, 1927, thus affording
an opportunity for comparing the latest available figures with those of the preceding month this
year and the corresponding month last year. It should be understood that the figures shown reflect
conditions as of the report dates only, and are not necessarily the highest or lowest figures that oc­
curred during the interval between the dates.
Although there was a slight increase totaling $225,000 between July n th and August 15th in com­
mercial and agricultural loans, declines in loans on stocks and bonds amounting to $870,000 and on
Government securities amounting to $29,000 reduced the total loans of the reporting banks by $674,doo. The reduction1 in loans on stocks and bonds was the first one reported for this item in many
months. Total investments in bonds and securities declined last month $675,000; reserve balance
with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond decreased $1,580,000; cash in vaults dropped $1,680,d o o ; demand deposits declined $4,987,000; time deposits decreased $295,000; and borrowing by the re­
porting banks at the reserve bank dropped $4,495,000. The reductions in loans and discounts and in
borrowing at the reserve bank were due to decreases in the larger cities, loans to customers and re­
discounting at the reserve bank by county banks having increased slightly during the month.
Between August 17, 1927, and August 15, 1928, total loans to customers of the reporting banks
declined $3,549,000. Loans on miscellaneous stocks and bonds rose $29,225,000 during the year,
but commercial, industrial and agricultural loans declined $32,546,000. Total investments in bonds
and securities rose $2,899,000 between August 17th last year and August 15th this year. A ggre­
gate reserve balance of the reporting banks at the reserve bank declined $6,813,000, partly due to a
drop of $26,591,000 in deposits. Demand deposits declined $38,012,000 during the year, but time de­
posits rose $11,421,000. Borrowing by the reporting banks at the reserve bank rose $20,241,000, or
over 300 per cent, between August 17, 1927, and August 15, 1928.
DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS
u irin io

TOTAL DEBITS DURING THE FIVE WEEKS ENDED
August 15, 1928

Asheville, N. C..............................................
Baltimore, Md.................. ..............................
Charleston, S. C.......... ....... ..........................
Charleston, W. Va..........................................
Charlotte, N. C.............. ...................... .........
Columbia, S. C.................. ....... ....................
Cumberland, Md..............................................
Danville, Va....................................................
Durham, N. C................................................
Greensboro, N. C............................................
Greenville, S. C..............................................
Hagerstown, Md........................ ....................
Huntington, W. Va........................................
Lynchburg, Va................................................
Newport News, Va..........................................
Norfolk, Va.....................................................
Portsmouth, Va..............................................
Raleigh, N. C.................................................
Richmond, Va....... ..........................................
Roanoke, Va...................................................
Spartanburg, S. C.........................................
Washington, D. C..........................................
Wilmington, N. C.............. ............................
Winston-Salem, N. C....................................

$

29,733,000
467,198,000
27,599,000
41,608,000
60,285,000
23,565,000
10,819,000
9,550,000
30,628,000
24,649,000
21,194,000
12,204,000
24,821,000
21,755,000
10,657,000
71,380,000
6,543,000
27,740,000
143,517,000
32,999,000
12,628,000
276,588,000
15,354,000
54,543,000

District Totals .............................................

$1,457,557,000

* This Norfolk figure includes totals for Portsmouth.



2

July 11, 1928
$

35,745,000
539,420,000
32,416,000
51,923,000
64,809,000
24,972,000
13,224,000
10,278,000
32,599,000
29,346,000
24,089,000
13,286,000
27,881,000
23,957,000
11,746,000
75,050,000
7,066,000
36,466,000
157,142,000
35,773,000
16,236,000
304,499,000
18,266,000
50,713,000

$1,636,902,000

August 17, 1927
$

33,197,000
489,190,000
27,733,000
45,789,000
57,685,000
24,433,000
11,403,000
9,534,000
35,062,000
25,722,000
22,646,000
12,309,000
29,099,000
21,255,000
10,477,000
84,066,000*
28,298,000
144,549,000
32,248,000
14,156,000
265,948,000
18,104,000
48,687,000

$1,491,590,000

Debits to individual, firm and corporation accounts in the leading trade centers of the Fifth
Federal reserve district are shown in the accompanying table for three periods of five weeks; each,
ended August 15, 1928, July n , 1928, and August 17, 1927. The figures for the latest available five
weeks period, ended August 15th, may be compared with those reported for the preceding five weeks
ended Ju ly n th this year and with those for the corresponding five weeks ended August 17, 1927.
Aggregate debits of $1,457,557,000 in the reporting banks during the five weeks ended August
15th shows a seasonal decrease under the total of $1,636,902,000 reported for the preceding like pe­
riod, ended Ju ly nth, the semi-annual and quarterly payments occurring on and around Ju ly 1st in­
creasing debits totals for the period containing that date. The decline, was uniformly distributed
throughout the district, Winston-Salem reporting the only increase during the later five weeks.
In comparison with the five weeks ended August 17, 1927, when debits totaling $1,491,590,000
were reported, the total of $1,457,557,000 reported for the five weeks ended August 15th this year shows
a decline of $34,033,000. Sixteen of the twenty-three cities reported lower figures for the 1928 period,
while seven cities reported higher figures.
SAVINGS DEPOSITS—Savings and time deposits changed little during the past month, but con­
tinued well above the corresponding 1927 figures. Twelve mutual savings banks in Baltimore had
deposits aggregating $183,584,146 at the close of business Ju ly 31, 1928, compared with $182,944,849 at
the end'of June this year and $167,542,473 at the end of July 1927. Sixty-four regularly reporting
member banks had aggregate time deposits amounting to $247,503,000 on August 15th this year,
compared iwith $247,798,000 on Ju ly n , 1928, andi $236,082,000 on August 17, 1927.
BUSINESS FAILURES—According to statistics collected by Dun’s Review, a progressive reduc­
tion in the number of commercial failures in the United States occurred during the last six months,
and the Ju ly total of 1,723 defaults was the smallest of the current year. Compared with the 1,756
insolvencies of Ju ly 1927, the present number is smaller by about 1.9 per cent. Aggregate liabili­
ties involved in the Ju ly 1928 insolvencies totaling $29,586,633 are also below those of any other
month this year, and are about 31.4 per cent below the aggregate of $43,149,974 involved in July
1927 "bankruptcies.
In thd Fifth reserve district, Ju ly commercial failures numbered 122, with liabilities totaling $1,838,607, compared with 114 failures and liabilities aggregating $4,065,583 reported for Ju ly 1927, a
slight increase in number but a large decline in liabilities this year in comparison with Ju ly last
year.
LABOR—The employment situation was complicated by excessive rains and floods during the
first half of August, and little progress was made on street, road and other outdoor construction
work. However, repairment of the damage done by high water will give employment to hundreds
of additional workers during the next few weeks, and will further reduce the number of unemployed.
Except for the changes brought by flood conditions in Virginia and the Carolinas, there were few
changes in employment figures during the past month. Textile mills resumed operations after a
shutdown early in July, but most of them are running only part time. The demand for coal con­
tinues seasonally slow, but production in Ju ly was higher than in June this year or Ju ly last year.
Tobacco factories are running full time, and the curing and marketing of tobacco has recently given
employment to some workers.
COAL—Bituminous coal production in Ju ly 1928 totaled 36,276,000 net tons, as against 35,963,000 tons mined in June and 33,637,000 tons in July 1927. Total production during the present cal­
endar year to August n th (approximately 189 working days) amounts to 285,098,000 net tons, the
lowest figure since 1924. West Virginia continues to lead in tonnage, although the recent decision
of the miners' union to allow workers and employees to make their own wage agreements has in­
creased production to some extent in certain union fields. Summer prices for coal at retail still pre­
vail, and retail yards are fully prepared to fill all orders promptly.
TEXTILES— Cotton mills in the Fifth reserve district consumed only 187,601 bales of cotton in
July this year, compared with 222,235 bales used in June and 239,653 bales consumed in July a year
ago. Due to a custom of closing the mills about a week around the Fourth of Ju ly a lower consump­
tion for that month than in June is seasonal, but this year the decline between June and July was
more marked than in most year^ because the mills closed ten days. Orders not being sufficient to
take the output of the mills, some stock had accumulated in the warehouses, and the mills adopted
the shutdown to allow shipments to catch up with production. The situation in the textile field con­
tinues highly unsatisfactory, with little sign o£ immediate improvement. The mills are running on
restricted schedules, but orders are insufficient to take even their limited output. The official cotton
crop estimate figurest did not help the situation. The mills have operated on a falling cotton mar­
ket since the beginning of July, which made buyers still more reluctant to place forward orders.



3

BUILDING OPERATIONS FOR THE MONTHS OF JULY 1928 AND 1927.
Permits Issued

0
2

CITIES

1 Baltimore, Md.....
2 Cumberland, Md...
3 Frederick, Md.....
4 Hagerstown, Md...
5 Danville, Va........
6 Lynchburg, Va....
7 Norfolk, Va.........
8 Petersburg, Va....
9
10 Richmond, Va.....
1 1 Roanoke, Va........
12 Bluefield, W. Va...
13 Charleston, W. Va.
14 Clarksburg, W. Va.
15 Huntington, W.Va.
16 Parkersburg, W. Va....
17 Asheville, N. C......
18 Charlotte, N. C....
19 Durham, N. C......
20 Greensboro, N. C.
21 High Point, N. C...
22 Raleigh, N. C...... .
23 Rocky Mount, N.C.
24 Salisbury, N. C....
25 Wilmington, N. C...
26
27
28
29
30
31

New

Repairs

1928 1927

Winston-Salem, N. C._

Charleston, S. C...
Columbia, S. C.....
Greenville, S. C...
Spartanburg, S. C.
Washington, D. C.

332

10
13
28
15
19

100

4
*14
80
49
7
38

12

41
18
19
58
42
54
43
29
9
15

12
77

2

17

12

19
145

580
23

10

17
16
15
84

2
87
44
9
40
26
44

21
24
69
46
45
52
27
19
16
9
116
16
19
15

22
110

New Construction

1928

1927

1,057

1,244 $ 2,827,300 $ 3,044,760
9
21,145
112,822
1
79,515
11,480
9
44,430
25,470
6
83,086
36,517
31
27,599
10,500
76
221,425
263,545
5
19,500
5,500
*12,590
78
448,500
673,640
48
217,587
137,476
6
5,675
82,425
19
64,896
80,570
18
250,500
97,837
2
51,450
170,180
1
51,700
92,650
164,216
83
168,902
21
709,469
456,645
13
276,448
141,465
484,920
47
237,385
192,050
8
177,625
145,205
17
72,686
26,735
21
138,920
4
52,775
60,315
6
95,600
37,700
79
323,760
514,325
22
1,530
20,250
148,700
83,100
37
129,100
27
51,800
11
58,590
50,315
359 4,043,700
2,134,125

8
0
12
12

40
124
3
*29

102

30

2
14

11

4
9
58
30

8

44
7
14
5
3

10
112

29
42
38
16
439

1928

1927

Totals............ 1,319 1,623 2,283 2,289 $11,267,106 $ 9,190,930

.micrauuiis
1928

1927

$ 768,020 $
11,090

0
29,290
8,300
46,775
39,375
925
*16,815
142,918
7,406

1,200

26,740
19,905
2,025
9,300
11,475
46,250
26,825
25,380
2,235
15,325
8,400
3,275
7,250
88,337
7,935
20,875
16,800
7,090
400,265
$1,800,986

Increase or Per Cent
of
Decrease
of
Increase
0
or
Total
2
Valuation Decrease

492,600 $
7,720 —
400
27,150
46,767
10,742
65,625 —
1,750
73,997
19,725
4,645
24,200
19,995
45
300
60,622
9,127
8,515
9,596
3,950
43,218

6,200
4,560
3,300
54,861
17,485
8,050
12,805
4,725
378,710
$1,421,385 $

1 .69&
57,960
88,307 — 73.3
67,635 569.3
40.1
21,100
9.7
8,102
53,132 250.1
68,370 — 20.8
181.7
13,175

— 156,219
67,792
— 80,195
— 13,134
152,573
— 116,750
— 31,950
— 53,833
289,947
153,293
263,319
12,710
44,626
— 109,985
—
8,825
61,850
— 157,089
— 28,270
78,425
81,295
10,640
1,931,130
2,455,777

— 20.9
43.1
— 92.1
— 12.5
129.5
— 68.6
— 34.4
— 23.5
62.3

102.2

106.6
7.0
38.5
— 75.8
— 13.6
150.9
— 27.6
— 74.9

86.0

125.8
19.3
76.9

1
2
3
4
5

6
7

8
Q
57
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

23.1%

— Denotes decrease.
* Portsmouth figures not included in totals.
NOTE— The figures in the above table reflect the amount of work provided for in the corporation limits o f the
several cities, but take no account of suburban developments.

Building permits issued for new construction in thirty leading cities of the fifth reserve district
totaled 1,319 in July this year, compared with 1,623 permits issued for similar work in July a year
ago, but the estimated valuation of the July 1928 work totaled $11,267,106 in comparison with $9,190,930 in July 1927. In alteration and repair work, Ju ly 1928 permits numbered 2,283, estimated
to cost $1,800,986, compared with 2,289 permits and a valuation of $1,421,385 in Ju ly last year. Total
estimated valuation for all classes of work was $13,068,092 last month, an increase of $2,455,777, or
23.1 per cent, over the total of $10,612,315 for all permits issued in Ju ly 1927. Eighteen of the thirty
reporting cities showed higher valuation figures last month than a year ago, while twelve cities re­
ported lower figures. Eight cities reported gains of more than 100 per cent, but in at least five of
the eight the high percentage gain was due to low figures in July 1927 rather than to particularly
large figures this year.
Contracts awarded in July for construction work in the fifth district, including both rural and
urban projects, totaled $32,884,428, compared with $34,241,000 awarded in July 1927, according to
figures collected by the F. W. Dodge Corporation. Of the awards in Ju ly this year, $10,759,283 was
for residential work.
COTTON—Spot cotton prices in the Carolinas declined approximately 3 cents per pound, or $15
a bale, during the past five weeks. The decline began in the second week of July as a result of fav­
orable weather for cotton growing and the announcement of acreage figures for this year. On
August 8th the Department of! Agriculture’s first condition report of the year indicated a probability
of a considerably larger crop than that of 1927, and prices slumped still lower. From a weekly av­
erage price of 21.66 cents per pound paid growers in the Carolinas for upland middling cotton during
the week ended Ju ly 14th the price dropped steadily to an average of 18.56 cents per pound during
the week ended August 18th, the latest period for which figures are available.
The first condition report of the year, issued by the Department of Agriculture on August 8th,
estimated probable production in 1928 at 14,291,000 bales, based upon an August 1st condition of
67.9 per cent on 46,695,000 acres in cultivation. The condition of the crop on August 1st this year
was approximately 2 points below the August 1, 1927, condition, but this year’s acreage is about 4,


4

000,000 acres larger than that of last year. The estimate of 14,291,000 bales for the 1928 crop com­
pares with 12,955,000 bales produced in 1927.
Cotton consumption in American mills in July was seasonally below consumption in June, and,
partly because of a longer shutdown for the Fourth of July holiday than in most years, consump­
tion last month was, also much less than in July 1927. The Bureau of the Census reported 438,743
bales of lint consumed last month, compared with 510,565 bales used in June this year and 569,765
bales in Ju ly 1927. Total consumption for the cotton year ended July 31st this year amounted to
6,932,689 bales, compared with 7,189,585 bales consumed during the corresponding period ended July
31, 1927. Cotton on hand at manufacturing establishments on July 31st this year totaled 1,007,017
bales, compared with 1,158,531 bales held on June 30th this year and 1,404,815 bales held on Ju ly 31st
last year. Bales in public warehouses and compresses numbered 1,189,565 at the end of July, 1,645,971 bales at the end of June, and 1,822,552 bales on Ju ly 31, 1927. Exports of cotton totaled 341,849
bales in July, compared with 389,358 bales sent abroad in Ju ly last year, and exports during the
cotton year totaled 7,733,177 bales compared with 11,183,938 bales exported in the year ended Ju ly
31, 1927.
Imports last month totaled 18,473 bales, compared with 31,147 bales imported in July
1927, while total imports for the cotton year just closed totaled 338,226 bales, compared with 400,983
bales brought in during the previous year. Consumption of cotton in the growing states totaled
331,961 bales in July, compared with 415,423 bales used in July last year. Last month’s consumption in
the cotton growing states amounted to 75.66 per cent of National consumption, compared with 72.91
per cent of National consumption reported for the cotton growing states in Ju ly last year.
Cotton improved distinctly during Ju ly and early August in the fifth district, and on August 1st
the Department of Agriculture estimated probable production in Virginia and the two Carolinas com­
bined as 1,918,000 bales, compared with 1,622,000 bales ginned from the 1927 crop. Virginia’s prob­
able production for 1928 is 48,000 bales, compared with 31,000 bales last year. North Carolina is ex­
pected to grow 973,000 bales, compared with 861,000 bales in 1927. South Carolina’s 1928 crop is
forecast at 897,000 bales, compared with 730,000 bales for the previous year. The weevil is widely
scattered in the Carolinas, and the yields now indicated may or may not be realized. If dry, hot
weather prevails during the last half of August and early September the crop may be larger than
present predictions, but if the weather is wet and cool, weevil damage may increase greatly beyond
expectations. The crop is quite generally late, due to the cool spring which made much replanting
necessary, but by replanting the farmers finally secured satisfactory stands.
TOBACCO—Tobacco markets in the South Carolina belt, which includes all South Carolina
markets and some border ones in North Carolina, opened on August 7th, but the crop was not as far
advanced as a year ago and sales were smaller on practically all floors. Prices were much lower than
those of August 1927, and the farmers have withheld some of their tobacco from the sales. Several
protest meetings have been held in the tobacco section of South Carolina, but prices continue much
lower than last year. South Carolina’s crop of 79,922,000 pounds is larger than the 1927 production of
76.648.000 pounds, but at present prices the farmers will not receive nearly as much for this year’s
tobacco. North Carolina production is estimated at 482,410,000 pounds, which is slightly below last
year’s crop of 485,300,000 pounds. The North Carolina crop is practically made, but has not been
cured, and a considerable amount of the weed is so green that the results of the curing are some­
what uncertain. The Virginia tobacco crop is estimated at 131,323,000 pounds, compared with 127,971.000 pounds in 1927. The crop made rapid growth early in Ju ly but toward the end of the month
much of it suffered from dry weather. Showers early in August relieved the situation in most counties,
and around the middle of the month rains fell over the entire state. Maryland’s tobacco crop is
estimated at about 27,000,000 pounds this year, compared with 26,176,000 pounds grown in 1927, and
West Virginia expects to raise 6,835,000 pounds compared with 6,000,000 pounds last year.
AGRICULTURAL NOTES—Maryland crop conditions improved generally during July. The yield
of wheat is reported as 8,910,000 bushels, compared with 9,188,000 bushels last year and a five-year
average production of 10,262,000 bushels. The condition of the crop improved steadily from early in­
dications, but weather conditions all through the season pointed to a yield below average. Corn gen­
erally looks goods, and a condition of 86 per cent on August 1st is 6 per cent higher than on July 1st.
The indicated production at this time is 22,069,000 bushels, which is slightly below 22,660,000 bushels
harvested in 1927. Weather factors may help the crop considerably before harvest time. Apple pro­
duction in Maryland this year is put at 2,001,000 bushels, compared with 1,700,000 bushels last year,
and the peach crop is estimated at 437,000 bushels against 352,000 bushels in 1927. Irish potatoes total
5.395.000 bushels this year, compared with 5,246,000 bushels dug in 1927, but the sweet potato crop of
1.445.000 bushels is below the production of 1,584,000 bushels last year. Present prospects for hay
are slightly better than last year, a crop of 727,000 tons comparing with 724,000 tons cured in 1927.
Virginia threshing reports show that the wheat crop yielded much better than had been expected.
The average for the state is reported to be 14.5 bushels per acre, the second largest yield, on record.
The wheat crop came through the winter in poor condition and last spring prospects were exceedingly
poor, but very favorable weather conditions during May and June caused improvement and the
heads filled out unusually well. The quality of the wheat is also unusually good. The total produc­
tion is estimated to be 9,570,000 bushels, compared with 8,331,000 bushels last year and a five-year



5

average of 9,650,000 bushels. The condition of corn improved during Ju ly in all parts of Virginia
except in the southern counties and a few; sections in the Shenandoah Valley, where there was not
sufficient rainfall. The August 1st condition of 85 per cent indicates a crop of 48,807,000 bushels,
compared with 47,967,000 bushels last year and a five-year average of 43,704,000 bushels. Weather
conditions during August will largely determine the final production. An excellent crop of hay was
harvested during Ju ly under very favorable weather conditions, as the rains during the latter part
of June and the first part of Ju ly caused considerable improvement. The outlook for late hay crops
is fairly good. Pastures were good during July, but the condition declined toward the end of the
month. The peanut crop made rapid growth last month and the condition on August 1st was bet­
ter than a month earlier. The August 1st condition of 86 per cent indicates a production of 143,793.000 pounds, compared with 116,128,000 pounds last year. The early potato crop has yielded better
than had been expected and on the Eastern Shore the average yield per acre was practically the same
as the wonderful yield of last year. As prices have been considerably1 below the cost of production
this has probably been the poorest season the Virginia potato growers have ever had. Prospects for
the late crop are generally good. The sweet potato crop improved during Ju ly and the condition of
85 per cent on August 1st indicated a production of 5,832,000 bushels, compared with 5,805,000 bushels
harvested last year. Shipments of the commercial crop have already started and prices have been
very good. West Virginia crop conditions improved very materially since Ju ly 1st and the present
outlook is about an average. Weather conditions in Ju ly were favorable, with sufficient rain for
moisture but not enough to stop cultivation of fields. A composite figure for all crops shows an
improvement in condition of 9.1 per cent between July 1st and August 1st, the greatest improvement
being in hay, followed by corn and other grain crops. Little change is shown in potatoes, tobacco,
pastures and fruits, but their condition remains good. North Carolina crops showed an average im­
provement of 5.9 per cent during July, practically every crop in the state either showing some improve­
ment or maintaining its condition prospects as of Ju ly 1st. The weather on the whole was favorable
in July, although complaints of both wetness and dryness were made from certain localities. The con­
dition of North Carolina corn is considered fair. Production is indicated as 45,978,000 bushels, com­
pared with 53,626,000 bushels harvested last year and a five-year average of 49,697,000 bushels. Much
of the crop had a late start, due to cool soil conditions, but has improved wonderfully and still has
time to make further improvements before maturity. The moist condition during the early season
was favorable to corn, but recent weather has been too dry. The sweet potato crop shared in the
general improvement during July, but is 2 points below the August estimate last year, and is exactly
an average of conditions during the past ten years. The 8,200,000 bushel crop indicated is 28 per cent
below last year’s production and is slightly less than the average crop for the five-year period. The
combined estimate of early and late Irish potatoes indicates a production of 9,932,000 bushels this
season. This is 35 per cent' more than was produced in North Carolina last year and is about 91 per
cent more than the average for the past five years. A condition of 81 per cent for peanuts on August
1st indicates a crop of 219,429,000 pounds, or an increase of 40 per cent over the crop grown last year.
The stand is appreciably better than last year, while the growth of vine is satisfactory. The nuts are
just beginning to form, however, and the ultimate yield depends upon the weather conditions during
the next few* weeks. Conditions thus far have been favorable for hay crops, with sufficient moisture
for all requirements. Apple prospects in commercial areas are for about 72 per cent of a full crop,
indicating a production of 235,000 barrels as compared with 91,000 barrels picked in 1927. Peach
prospects indicate a yield of 2,596,000 bushels, compared with 1,300,000 bushels lasjt year. The peach
outlook is good for production but poor for price. Much of the commercial production will probably
not be harvested on account of unsatisfactory prices and the presence of disease which makes much
of the crop unsaleable. South Carolina crop prospects improved during July, and on August 1st were
about equal to the ten-year average. Corn improved 5 points, and the condition of 73 per cent on
August 1st indicated a crop of close to 23,000,000 bushels, compared with 25,499,000 bushels last year
and an average production of 23,900,000 bushels for the past five years. The sweet potato crop, esti­
mated at 78 per cent of normal, is estimated to yield 4,173,000 bushels, compared with 5,300,000 bushels
last year. The reduction in prospects this year is partly due to a 6 per cent smaller acreage. Peanuts
at 75 per cent give promise of producing about 7,838,000 pounds, compared with 8,525,000 pounds last
year. Hay with an August 1st condition of 77 per cent indicates a yield of about 315,000 tons, com­
pared with the large crop of 356,000 tons last year and an average production for five years of
248.000 tons. South Carolina’s peach crop, which is commercially important in a few counties, is
forecast at 1,397,000 bushels this year, in comparison with 615,000 bushels gathered in 1927.
WHOLESALE TRADE, JULY 1928

Wholesale trade in the Fifth reserve district in groceries was in larger volume in Ju ly this year
than in Ju ly a year ago, but sales by reporting firms selling dry goods, shoes, hardware, furniture
and drugs were in smaller amount during the 1928 month.
In comparison with sales in June this
year, sales in Ju ly were larger in shoes, furniture and drugs, but were smaller in groceries, dry goods
and hardware. During the first seven months of 1928, sales by the reporting grocery firms exceeded
sales during the corresponding seven months of 1927, but sales in all other lines were less this year.
Stocks of goods on the shelves of the reporting firms at the end of Ju ly were larger in groceries
and dry goods than stocks on Ju ly 31, 1927, but shoe and hardware stocks were smaller last month.



6

Percentage increase in July 1928 sales, compared with sales in July 1927:
32 Groceries
10 Dry Goods
5 Shoes
16 Hardware
5 Furniture
13 Drugs
A
— 26.5
— 6.5
— 16.9
— 39.1
— 1.7
Percentage increase in July 1928 sales, compared with sales in June 1928:
— 6.5
— 1.7
25.1
— 8.1
11.1
.2
Percentage increase in total sales since Jan. 1st, compared with sales in the first seven months of 1927:
.9
— 16.5
— 1.9
— 11.8
— 27.1
— 2.7
Percentage increase in stock on July 31, 1928, compared with stock on July 31, 1927:
1.5(11*)
1.4(4*)
— 9.1(4*)
— 2.0(8*)
.......
.......
Percentage increase in stock on July 31, 1928, compared with stock on June 30, 1928:
— 2.1(11*)
2.8(4*)
8.2(4*)
5.3(8*)
.......
Percentage of collections in July to total accounts receivable on July 1, 1928:
_________ 61.6(18*)__________ 31.1(7*)___________ 23.1(5*)
28.1(12*) _______ 18.0(3*)________ 58.3(9*)
— Denotes decreased percentage.

* Number of reporting firms.

Grocery stocks were smaller on Ju ly 31st than on June 30th, both this year, but dry goods, shoe and
hardware stocks increased during July.
The percentage of collections in Ju ly to accounts receivable on Ju ly 1st were lower this year
than last in all lines except dry goods and drugs, furniture experiencing the greatest decline. A com­
parison of the Ju ly collection percentages with those of June this year shows declines in every line
except dry goods. Hardware and furniture percentages both showed marked recessions from those of
the preceding month.
FIGURES ON RETAIL TRADE

As Indicated By Reports from Thirty Representative Department Stores for the Month of July 1928
Percentage increase in July, 1928 sales, compared with sales in July, 1927:
Baltimore
Richmond
Washington
Other Cities
District
2.3
2.9
7.0
— 7.2
3.1
Percentage increase in total sales since January 1st, over sales during the first seven months of 1927:
— 1.2
2.8
2.9
— 6.0
.3
Percentage increase in July, 1928 sales over average July sales during the three years1923-1925, inclusive:
— 1.6
6.5
15.6
— 3.7
5.2
Percentage increase in stock on hand July 31, 1928, over stock on July 31, 1927:
— 3.2
— 4.4
— 2.4
.2
— 2.6
Percentage increase in stock on hand July 31, 1928, over stock on June 30, 1928:
— 2.4
— .2
— 7.5
— 4.1
— 4.3
Percentage of sales in July 1928 to average stock carried during that month:
19.6
24.4
23.9
16.8
21.2
Percentage of total sales since January 1st, to average stock carried during each of the seven elapsed months:
173.0
197.1
189.8
135.1
176.3
Percentage of collections in July, 1928 to total accounts receivable on July 1st:
24.1
29.7
31,1
29.1
27.3
— Denotes decreased percentage.

Retail trade in the Fifth reserve district in July, as measured by dollar sales in thirty leading
department stores, averaged 3.1 per cent more than in Ju ly 1927, but was seasonally below the
volume of trade in June of this year. Total sales during the first seven months of this year averaged
3/ioths of 1 per cent above sales during the corresponding seven months last year. Ju ly 1928 sales
were 5.2 per cent above average July sales during the three years 1923-1925, inclusive.
Stocks on the shelves of the reporting stores, at retail prices, were 2.6 per cent less at the end
of Ju ly 1928 than at the same time a year earlier, and were 4.3 per cent less, than stocks on hand on
June 30th this year, the latter being a seasonal decline.
The percentage of sales during July to average stocks carried during the month totaled 21.2
per cent, and the percentage of total sales during the seven elapsed months this year to average stocks
carried during each month was 176.3 per cent, a slightly higher figure than 174.8 per cent reported by
the same stores for the first seven months in 1927.
Collections by twenty-nine of the thirty reporting stores during Ju ly totaled 27.3 per cent of out­
standing receivables as of Ju ly 1st, a lower rate than was reported for June this year but higher than
the average of 25.0 per cent collected in July last year. Baltimore, Richmond and Washington per­
centages of collections were higher this year than in Ju ly 1927, but the Other Cities group reported
slower collections for July this year.




(Compiled August 21, 1928)

7

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
(Compiled by the Federal Reserve Board)

1924

1926

1928

Index number of production of manufactures and ninerale combined,
adjusted for seasonal variations (1923-25 average - 100).
Latest figure, July 109.

1924

1925

1926

1927

1928

Index of United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (1826 - 100, base
adopted by Bureau).
Latest figure, July 98.3.
PER C E N T
PER CENT

6

1928
Weekly rates in New York money market: commercial paper rate on 4-to-6
months paper and acceptance rate on 90-day paper.

1924

1925

1926

1927

1928

llonthly averages of weekly figures for banks in 101 leading citi«s.
Latest figures are averages for first 3 weekly reports in August.




Industrial and trade activity was in larger volume in July than
is usual in midsummer and the general level of commodity prices
advanced slightly. Member bank holdings of securities and loans
on securities declined in July and August, while all other loans
increased to the highest level since 1921. Conditions in the money
market remained firm.
PRODUCTION. Production of manufactures and minerals
showed a smaller decrease than usual in July, and the index of in­
dustrial production, which makes allowance for seasonal variations,
advanced. Production o f steel, bituminous coal, petroleum, auto­
mobiles, and footwear was larger in July than in June, while activity
in textile mills, meat packing, and copper and anthracite mines
declined. Lumber production showed less than the usual seasonal
decrease. Steel mill activity, which during July was at an un­
usually high level for the summer season, was well maintained
during August.
Weekly reports from Detroit factories show a
larger volume of employment in the middle of August than at any
previous date, indicating that automobile production continued large
in that month. Building contracts awarded declined by somewhat
more than the usual seasonal amount in July, but were larger than
in any previous July, the increase over last year being chiefly in
residential building. Contracts awarded in the first two weeks in
August were slightly smaller than in the same period o f last year.
Estimates of the Department of Agriculture as of August 1 in­
dicate considerable improvement in crop conditions during July.
Estimated wheat production was 891,000,000 bushels, larger by
91.000.000 bushels than on July 1 and slightly larger than the
yield in 1927. The corn crop is expected to be more than 3,000,000,000 bushels, an increase of 250,000,000 bushels from last year.
Forecasts for other grain crops were also larger than the July 1
estimates and in most cases exceeded last year’s yields. The
August 1 forecast of cotton production was 14,290,000 bales as
compared with yields of 12,955,000 bales in 1927 and nearly
18.000.000 bales in 1926.
TRADE. Distribution of commodities at wholesale and retail
was in large volume in July. Sales of dry goods and shoes at
wholesale were larger than in June, and those of other lines were
only slightly smaller. Department store sales, after allowance for
seasonal changes, increased in July. Compared with July a year
ago, trade of both wholesale and retail firms was larger. Stocks
of department stores and wholesale firms continued smaller than a
year ago. Freight car loadings increased by more than the usual
seasonal amount in July and for the first time this year were larger
than in the corresponding month of 1927. Increases, compared
with last year, were reported in ^loadings of miscellaneous comcommodities and of grain, reflecting the early harvesting o f the
crop this year. The largest decrease, as compared with a year
ago, was in live stock shipments. During the first two weeks in
August, total loadings were in about the same volume as in the
corresponding weeks of last year.
PRICES. The general level of wholesale commodity prices
increased slightly in July, reflecting chiefly advances in the prices
Df live stock and meats, although there were also small increases
in hide and leather products, textiles, petroleum products, and
building materials. There was a sharp decline in the price o f
grains, other than corn, and some decrease in chemicals and drugs,
silk, rubber, and automobile tires. During the first half of August
there were increases in the prices of sugar, hogs, pork products,
coke, and lumber, and decreases in grains, cotton, wool, and hides.
BANK CREDIT. Between July 18 and August 15, total loans
and investments of member banks in leading cities decreased by
about $130,000,000. This decline reflected a considerable reduction
in investments chiefly at banks in New York City, and some further
decline in loans on securities. All other loans, which include loans
for commercial purposes, showed a small seasonal increase and at
the middle of August were in the largest volume since early in
1921 and nearly $230,000,000 larger than at the Autumn peak o f
last year. There was a further large decline in net demand de­
posits, and practically no change in time deposits. The volume o f
reserve bank credit outstanding showed little change between July
25 and August 22. Discounts and acceptance holdings increased
slightly while United States security holdings were practically un­
changed. Increased demand for currency, which is usual at this
time of the year, has not resulted in an equivalent growth in re­
serve bank credit, because it was offset in part by a decline in
reserves required by member banks, which reflected the decrease
in their deposits. There were further increases between the middle
of July and the middle of August in open market rates on col­
lateral loans, commercial paper, and bankers acceptances.

8