View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY

REVIEW

BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS

_________________ W ILLIAM W. H O X TO N . CHAIRMAN AND FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT________________ .

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
Sentiment in the business world became distinctly
more optimistic during July and early August, and
concrete evidence that this increased confidence as
to future prospects is well founded is not lacking.
There are weak spots here and there, but favorable
factors are much more numerous, and the majority
of our correspondents are quite cheerful over the
outlook for fall business.
The leading unfavorable element in sight at
present is a probable reduction in the yields of the
Districts's three leading crops, cotton, tobacco and
corn. Cotton, which takes first rank as a money
crop, is much below last year in condition in North
Carolina and Virginia, and is somewhat below last
year in South Carolina. If favorable weather pre­
vails during the balance of the season, however,
there may be considerable improvement in the crop,
and at any rate the yield promises now to be re­
munerative at the prices likely to prevail. The
tobacco crop condition is much below last year’s
in all of the Fifth District states, and present
prospects do not appear to indicate! a scale of prices
that will leave the growers much profit after ex­
penses are paid, but the South Carolina markets
are the only ones that have opened and better
prices may be secured later when the North Caro­
lina and Virginia crops are sold, a situation which
has frequently arisen in the past. The corn crop
is smaller than in 1923, but corn is not a money
crop to any considerable degree except in Virginia,
perhaps, and with a very large hay crop to sup­
plement corn plenty of farm feed appears assured.
As a rule the less important crops are showing
up better than the leaders. Fruit prospects are the
best in years, truck crops were fair to good, small
grains did well, and peanuts are steadily improving.
The most striking improvement noted in the Fifth
District business world during the past month is
the change in the textile outlook. A month ago
both jobbers and manufacturers of cotton goods
were pessimistic. But early in August the senti­
ment changed, and since then many mills have in­




AUGUST 30,1924
creased their operating time. Orders have been
placed by jobbers with considerably more freedom
than previously, though most of them were for
early shipment, and mills have been able in some
cases to secure more advantageous prices for their
goods than have recently prevailed.
Another improvement developed in the coal min­
ing industry during July and early August, but
the change in this case was largely seasonal and
was much less marked than the improvement in
textiles.
Business failures were more numerous during
July than in July 1923, and liabilities were also
greater, but both the number and the total of lia­
bilities involved were lower in the Fifth District
than in either May or June of this year.
The Fifth District appears to have ample pur­
chasing power this season, and there seems nothing
to prevent a splendid fall business if the public
develops a buying mood. Bank deposits are near
or fully up to a record point, and the banks are
in a very strong position and are able to care for
any legitimate credit demands that appear likely
to develop. The volume of rediscounts at the Re­
serve Bank is very small, with a consequent high
reserve ratio of cash to deposit and note liabilities.
Current transactions as reflected in debits to in­
dividual accounts at clearing house banks are above
the transactions a year ago. Labor is quite well
employed at peak or near peak wages, and con­
struction work of all kinds is holding up so well
that plenty of work appears assured for all workers
either directly or remotely connected with build­
ing. Retail trade, as reflected by department store
sales, was greater in dollar apiount in July than
in July 1923, and wholesale trade, while somewhat
below last year in value, is showing signs of ma­
terial improvement in comparison with recent
months.

The National Summary will be found on pages 10 and II.

CONDITION OF SEVENTY-FIVE REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
Aug. 13, 1924

ITEMS
1. Total Loans and Discounts (including
all rediscounts)................................... $
2. Total Investments in Bonds and Securi­
ties ......................................................
3. Total Loans and Investments...................
4. Reserve Balance with Federal Reserve
Bank.....................................................
5. Cash in Vaults...........................................
6. Demand Deposits.......................................
7. Time Deposits............................................
8. Borrowed from Federal Reserve Bank....

459,537,000

July 9, 1924
$

467,625,000

Aug. 15, 1923
$

458,164,000

119.248.000
578.785.000

114.395.000
582.020.000

130.803.000
588.967.000

36.616.000
13.136.000
337.015.000
176.832.000
8,205,000

35.459.000
13.712.000
332.100.000
172.072.000
16.270.000

34,033,000
13 281,000
325.401.000
152.009.000
36,8*7.000

The accompanying table shows the principal items of condition reported by seventy-five identical mem­
ber banks as of three dates, August 13, 1924, July 9, 1924 and August 15, 1923, thus affording an op­
portunity for comparing the totals reported for the latest date with those reported for the preceding month
this year and on the corresponding date a year ago. The number of reporting banks has been reduced dur­
ing the past month from seventy-six to seventy-five, but the reduction resulted from a merger of two banks
and does not destroy the comparative value of this month’s figures with those previously reported.
The items in the table as of July 9th and August 13th, both this year, show a marked decline in the
demand for credit at the reporting banks during the period under review. Between July 9th and August
13th, total loans and discounts dropped from $467,625,000 to $459,537,000, a decrease of $8,088,000, and
rediscounts at the Reserve Bank were reduced from $16,270,000 to $8,205,000, a decline of $8,065,000.
During the same period, the reporting banks increased their investments in bonds and securities from
$114,395,000 to $119,248,000; their reserve balances at the Reserve Bank rose in the aggregate from $35,459.000 to $36,616,000; their demand deposits increased from $332,100,000 to $337,015,000; and their time
deposits increased from $172,072,000 to $176,832,000. Cash in vaults dropped from $13,712,000 to $13,136.000.
On August 15, 1923, the seventy-five reporting banks were lending $458,164,000 to their customers,
but at the same time they were borrowing $36,887,000 from the Federal Reserve Bank, while on August
13th this year their outstanding loans to customers amounted to $459,537,000 and their Reserve Bank bor­
rowing totaled only $8,205,000, an increase in loans of $1,373,000 but a decrease in rediscounts of $28,682,000. During the year the reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank rose from $34,033,000 to $36,616.000. These changes, all denoting gains in the assets of the reporting banks, were made possible by
a reduction of investments in bonds and securities daring the year from $130,803,000 to $119,248,000; a
reduction of cash in vaults from $13,281,000 to $13,136,000; an increase in demand deposits from $325,401.000 to $337,015,000; and an increase in time deposits from $152,009,000 to $176,832,000. All of th,e
changes reflect the easy money conditions now prevailing in comparison with the same period last year.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OPERATIONS
The demand for credit at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond continued to decline during the period
between July 16th and August 13th, both this year. Between the two dates mentioned, rediscounts for
member banks dropped from $45,673,000 to $32,895,030, a reduction of $12,778,000, or approximately 28
percent. At the same time the volume of Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation declined $2,202,000,
falling from $70,759,000 to $68,557,000, and reserve deposits of member banks increased by $445,000, rising;
from $61,395,000 to $61,840,000. As a result of the changes mentioned, the cash reserves of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond increased from $91,533,000 on July 16th to $104,661,000 on August 13th, and
the ratio of cash reserves to combined note and deposit liabilities rose from 68.50% to 79.23% during
the four weeks under review.
On August 15, 1923, the volume of rediscounts for members held by the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond amounted to $67,397,000 compared with $32,895,000 on the corresponding date this year, and
Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation on the 1923 date amounted to $79,453,000 compared with $68,557.000 on the 1924 date. During the year the reserve deposits of member banks at the Reserve Bank
rose from $59,694,000 to $61,840,000. As a result of the lessened demand for credit this year in com­
parison with the same period in 1923, the cash reserves of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond rose
from $79,215,000 on August 15, 1923 to $104,661,000 on August 13, 1924, and the ratio of cash to com­
bined note and deposit liabilities increased frcm 56.23 percent to 79.23 percent.




2

SAVINGS BANK DEPOSITS
The monthly reports from fifteen Baltimore savings Banks showed a slight decline in deposits during
July, but this is a seasonal occurrence. Total deposits at the end of July amounted to $143,421,389, the
highest figure reported at the end of any month except June. On July 31, 1923, total deposits in these
banks aggregated $137,190,684; on July 31, 1922, the total was $127,391,229; on July 31, 1921, it was
$123,345,754; and on July 31, 1920, it was $120,142,672. Between July 31, 1923 and July 31, 1924 de­
posits in the reporting banks increased 4.5% and between the 1920 and the 1924 dates the increase was
19.4%.

DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS IN LEADING TRADE CENTERS

f

TOTAL DEBITS FOR THE FIVE WEEKS ENDING
CITIES
Aug. 13, 1924

July 9, 1924

Aug. 15, 1923

Asheville, N. C...................................................
Baltimore, Md.....................................................
Charleston, S. C.................................................
Charleston, W. Va..............................................
Charlotte, N. C....................................................
Columbia, S. C....................................................
Cumberland, Md.................................................
Danville, Va........................................................
Durham, N. C......................................................
Greensboro, N. C................................................
Greenville, S. C...................................................
Hagerstown, Md.................................................
Huntington, W. Va............................................
Lynchburg, Va....................................................
Newport News, Va.............................................
Norfolk, Va.........................................................
Raleigh, N. C.......................................................
Richmond, Va.....................................................
Roanoke, Va.......................................................
Spartanburg, S. C...............................................
Washington, D. C...............................................
Wilmington, N. C...............................................
Winston-Salem, N. C..........................................

$

30,452,000
433.025.000
24.624.000
38.998.000
43.576.000
20.837.000
10.874.000
9.291.000
21.671.000
23.462.000
19.331.000
12.653.000
28.399.000
20.712.000
8.838.000
81.079.000
28.311.000
134.473.000
26.063.000
13.514.000
215.500.000
19.371.000
38.398.000

$

27,470,000
433.293.000
31.996.000
40.194.000
47.355.000
23.064.000
11.767.000
8.915.000
21.952.000
23.101.000
21.061.000
12.173.000
29.069.000
22.941.000
8.078.000
72.536.000
33.391.000
140.123.000
29.362.000
15.909.000
253.686.000
21.633.000
37.049.000

$

27,776,000
432.300.000
31.666.000
40.057.000
39.063.000
24.182.000
10.962.000
9.307.000
20.579.000
24.075.000
21.781.000
11.412.000
29.921.000
21.314.000
8.598.000
74.469.000
34.295.000
129.720.000
26.983.000
10.724.000
203.109.000
19.100.000
35.207.000

Totals for 23 cities................. ................

$

1,303,452,000

$

1,366,118,000

$

1,286,600,000

The accompanying table shows total debits to individual, firm and corporation accounts in the clearing
house banks in twenty-three of the chief trade centers of the Fifth Reserve District during three periods
of five weeks each, ending August 13, 1924, July 9, 1924 and August 15, 1923, thus affording an oppor­
tunity for comparing the latest five weeks period with (1) the preceding like period this year, and (2)
the corresponding period last year. The debits figures include all checks drawn on deposit accounts of
individuals, firms and corporations, and the United States Government, including checks against savings
accounts, payments from trust funds and certificates of deposit paid, and the figures furnish a very good
index of the volume of business transactions carried on during the periods included in the table.
Total debits in the twenty-three reporting cities during the five weeks ending August 13, 1924, amount­
ed to $1,303,452,000, compared with $1,366,118,000 reported for the preceding five weeks, ending July
9, 1924, a decrease of $62,666,000, or 4.6%, during the more recent period. This decrease is very largely
a seasonal one, however, and is due to the large volume of end-of-quarter and semi-annual payments made
on July 1st, to income tax payments on June 15th, and to the usual midsummer dullness in many lines of
trade always encountered in late July and most of August
The five weeks ending August 13th this year show an increase of $16,852,000 in debits in the re­
porting cities over the total of $1,286,600,000 reported for the five weeks ending August 15th last year,
.and in view of somewhat higher prices which prevailed last year in most lines it is likely that the in­
crease in the volume of business done during the 1924 period under review was greater than the figures
alone indicate. Twelve reporting cities show higher figures this year than last, while eleven cities show
declines.




3

BUSINESS FAILURES IN THE TWELVE FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS
JULY, 1924 AND 1923.
Per Cent
Increase or
Decrease

Number
City and District
1924

1923

Boston, First.......................................
New York, Second............................
Philadelphia, Third............................
Cleveland, Fourth..............................
Richmond, Fifth................................
Atlanta, Sixth.....................................
Chicago, Seventh................. ..............
St. Louis, Eighth..... ..........................
Minneapolis, Ninth............................
Kansas City, Tenth...........................
Dallas, Eleventh.................................
San Francisco, Twelfth.....................

131
329
74
155
123

91
298
40
91
76
82
136
47
71

Totals...........................................

1,615

102

213
64
81
106
40
197

44.0
10.4
85.0
70.3
61.8
24.4
56.6
36.2
14.1
60.6
— 50.6
29.6

66

81
152
1,231

31.2%

Liabilities
1924

1923

$ 1,539,996
12,717,797
3,057,246
5,947,876
2,675,646
1,299,886
3,777,361
579,643
1,427,184
1,150,169
242,424
2,398.010

$ 1,644,931
7,049,066
3,979,044
5,763,981
1,301,279
1,743,751
5,382,698
563,872
1,163,446
2,795,103
2,576,000
1,758,017

$ 36,813,238

$ 35,721,188

Per Cent of
Increase or
Decrease
•—

6.4%
80.4
— 23.2
3.2
105.6
— 25.5
— 29.8

2.8
22.7
— 58.9
— 90.6
36.4
3.1%

The table accompanying this paragraph shows the number of failures and the total liabilities involved
in each of the twelve Federal Reserve districts during July 1924 and 1923. In commenting on the month’s
record, Dun's Review for August 9th says, “ Only a slight change occurred in the number of business fail­
ures in the United States last month, a total of 1,615 being reported. This represents an< increase of
five-tenths of one percent over the 1,607 defaults of June, though the July liabilities of $36,813,238 are
about eight percent in excess of the $34,099,031 of the earlier month. The heavier indebtedness is ac­
counted for by the larger amount involved by the failures of unusual size, those for $100,000 or more
in each case numbering 54 and having liabilities of $19,715,819. Similar defaults in June numbered 46,
for about $14,128,000. All commercial failures considered, the number last month, if slightly above that
for June, is below the totals for all other months this year and shows a decrease of 23 percent from the
high point reached last January. When comparison is made with the returns for July 1923, a sharp in­
crease is shown, the defaults of that period numbering 1,231. This, however, marked the smallest ag­
gregate for any month since November 1920, the business mortality during the summer of last year, in
point of number of failures, having been at an unusually low level. Yet the liabilities for July 1923,
despite the relatively small number of defaults, exceeded $35,700,000, the average of $29,018 per failure
being considerably above the average of $22,795 for the same month of the present year.”
Business failures in the Fifth District numbered 123 in July 1924, with liabilities of $2,675,646, com­
pared with 76 failures and liabilities amounting to $1,301,279 reported in July last year, an increase this
year of 61.8 percent in number of defaults and 105.6 percent in liabilities involved. The number of fail­
ures in July this year was lower than in either May or June, however, and the July liabilities were the
lowest reported in the District since November last year.
Average liabilities per failure during July 1924 amounted to $22,795 in the nation and $21,753 *n
Fifth District, compared with averages of $29,018 in the nation and $17,122 in the Fifth District during
July 1923.

LABOR— Good weather during the past month enabled contractors, road builders, and other employ­
ers of unskilled labor to push their work forward, thus reducing somewhat the surplus of laborers that
had begun to appear in the cities. Skilled workers continued fully employed, but there were sufficient men
to meet the demand. Farm labor continues scarce and high priced, but the farmers have become some­
what reconciled to this condition and are making the best of the situation, doing their work with the mem­
bers of their own families. Textile labor is better employed now than a month ago, and there has recently
been some seasonal improvement in the coal fields. Female labor in the cities is better employed than a
month ago, but much of this work is temporary, being due to substitute work at vacation time and to
cleaning work as fall approaches.
COAL—The output of bituminous coal continued to increase slowly during July and the first ten days
in August, and reached the daily average attained in 1921, but production is still far behind 1923 and 1920.
The United States Geological Survey, in its August 16th report, says that the course of the recovery of pro­
duction is following with remarkable closeness the line for 1921. Total production during the first 188 days
of the calendar year 1924 was 269,684,000 net tons, a lower figure than was attained in 1918, 1919, 1920 or
1923, but a higher figure than was reported in either 1921 or 1922. The great strike in the bituminous fields
partially accounted for the low 1922 production. Prices of coal remain unchanged from summer quota­
tions in most markets, and dealers’ yards are well stocked. Consumers’ stocks are thought to be compara­
tively low, and dealers expect that the first cold weather will bring an immediate and material improvement




4

in the demand for fuel. A recently observed tendency toward increased operating time in many manufac­
turing lines should also prove of advantage to the coal industry.

TEXTILES—Prospects in the textile field of the Fifth District have improved distinctly since our
July 31st Review was written. The Department of Agriculture's cotton condition reports released during the
past month appeared to convince both manufacturers and buyers that this year’s crop will not be sufficiently
large to cause much change in either cotton or textiles prices, and an appreciably larger volume of orders
has been placed with mills during the past two or three weeks. Most of these orders are for prompt de­
livery, there being as yet no great change in the buyer’s reluctance to make future commitments, but the air
has been cleared of much doubt and uncertainty, and psychologically the situation has greatly improved.
Quite a number of mills have begun expanding operations by increasing the number of weekly running
hours or days, and mills that had surplus goods on hand have been able to dispose of a considerable volume
of stock. Conditions among the mills vary widely, some mills having all the orders they can fill while
others have none, but the prospects now appear to be bright for the coming months. The cotton crop is
of course not yet made and gathered, and its development will influence the volume of business the mills
secure in the near future, but present prospects as to probable yield would have to improve phenomenally to
work much change in the better feeling that now prevails in textile circles.
Cotton consumed in the Fifth District during July amounted to 140,863 bales, North Carolina mills
having used 72,833 bales, South Carolina mills 62,823 bales, and Virginia mills 5,207 bales. The number of
bales used in North Carolina and Virginia was lower than the number used in June, but South Carolina mills
increased their consumption slightly during the more recent month. The Fifth District consumption during
July amounted to 40.6% of national consumption compared with 40.9% of national consumption reported
for the three Fifth District states in June 1924 and 40.0% in July 1923.

COTTON—Cotton prices have fluctuated widely during the past month as various official and private
conditions and weather reports were issued, and cotton interests are waiting anxiously for the Department
of Agriculture’s report to be released on August 23d. In our July 31st Review we quoted spot cotton prices
in the Carolinas through the week ending July 19th, the latest quotation shown being 27.85 cents per pound.
The week ending July 26th, during which the Department of Agriculture issued a condition report, wit­
nessed an advance to an average of 29.42 cents, but since that time the trend has been downward, dropping
to an average of 28.25 cents per pound during the week ending August 2, to 27.95 cents during the period
ending August 9th, and to 27.15 cents during the latest period for which figures are available, ending
August 16th. All of the prices quoted were taken from official figures collected by the Cotton Quotation
Service of the United States Department of Agriculture and represent actual sales of spot cotton on various
markets in the two Carolinas.
The Department of Agriculture’s fourth cotton condition report for this season was issued on August
8th, and estimated the August 1st condition at 67.4% in comparison with 68.5% on July 16th this year and
67.2% on July 25th last year. The indicated crop was 12,351,000 bales on August 1st, compared with an
estimate of 11,934,000 bales on July 16th this year and final figures of 10,128,478 bales grown in 1923.
Between July 16th and August 1st the condition of the crop increased from 56% to 58% in North Carolina
and from 59% to 60% in South Carolina, but the Virginia condition declined from 54% to 51% . On July
25th last year the condition figure in North Carolina was 82%, South Carolina’s was 64%, and Virginia’s
88%. Since August 1st the weather on the whole has been favorable, although somewhat too cool for cot­
ton, and it is probable that the crop in the Fifth District is at present better than the latest available figures
indicate.
The Census Bureau’s first ginning report of the season, giving the amount of cotton ginned up to July
31st, showed only 21,925 bales in comparison with 64,381 bales to July 31st last year. This report shows
clearly how late the crop is this year.
Cotton consumed in American mills during July amounted to 346,671 bales, compared with 350,277 bales
used in June this year and 461,575 bales in July 1923. Total consumption during the 1923-1924 cotton year,
which closed July 31st, was 5,669,971 bales, compared with 6,664,710 bales used in the preceding year.
Cotton on hand in consuming establishments at the end of July amounted to 719,827 bales, in comparison
with 950,625 bales so held on June 30, 1924 and 1,089,230 bales on July 31, 1923. Public warehouses
and compresses held 673,934 bales on July 31st, compared with 882,204 bales on June 30th this year and
938,689 bales on July 31st last year. Imports during July totaled 6,597 bales, compared with 13,640 bales
in June 1924 and 6,356 bales in July 1923, while exports totaled 211,533 bales in July 1924, 230,979 bales
in June 1924, and 171,469 bales in July 1923. Cotton consumed in the cotton growing states during July
numbered 241,069 bales, compared with 247,478 bales in June 1924 and 308,181 bales in July 1923. July
consumption in the cotton growing states amounted to 69.5% of national consumption, compared with
70.7% of national consumption used in the cotton growing states during June 1924 and 66.8% used in July
1923.




5

Virginia's cotton crop has the poorest outlook for many years, but the dry weather that has prevailed
during August has permitted more thorough cultivation and if favorable weather continues there is still the
possibility of considerable improvement. The estimated crop this year, based on the August ist condition,
is 30,000 bales in comparison with 50,000 bales grown last year. In North Carolina this year’s production
is estimated at 753,956 bales, in comparison with 1,020,000 bales gathered in 1923 and a ten year average
of 792,708 bales. The boll weevil is present throughout North Carolina, but is doing comparatively little
damage. Cotton has improved since August ist, according to the August 15th report of the Agricultural
Statistician, the plants showing better color and fruitfulness, but the cotton crop is quite short and many
sections report heavy shedding, especially where conditions are dry. The South Carolina crop varies widely
in different sections of the state, ranging from a condition of 41% in one district on the coast to 72% in the
northwestern counties. The weather during the latter part of July and the first half of August was favor­
able for cotton in South Carolina, and much progress was made during that period, especially in the Pied­
mont counties. The weevil is less active than last year, and has done little damage. Throughout the Fifth
District as well as the entire cotton belt the controlling influence this year has been the weather.

TOBACCO—Virginia’s tobacco crop declined in condition during July, owing to the unfavorable
weather. The August ist condition of 70% indicates a probable production of 128,828,000 pounds in com­
parison with 150,900,000 pounds produced last year. Many fields of late tobacco may make considerable im­
provement if favorable weather is encountered during the balance of the growing season.
In North Carolina the condition of tobacco declined from 77% to 68% during July, indicating on
August ist a probable production of 270,000,000 pounds in comparison with 386,000,000 pounds grown in
1923. Much of the crop ripened before the plants fully matured and light yields resulted. The color is
generally good, however. Most of the tobacco crop has been harvested. The North Carolina acreage was
approximately 10% less than in 1923.
Tobacco condition in South Carolina dropped from 69% on July ist to 55% on August ist, indicating
a yield of about 47,000,000 pounds in comparison with 74,460,000 pounds in 1923. The tobacco markets in
South Carolina opened early in August, and prices are generally considered satisfactory for the grades of
tobacco offered. The quality of tobacco appears to be good on the average.

AGRICULTURAL NOTES—Reporting on crops in Virginia on August nth, the Agricultural Statis­
tician stated that conditions did not improve during July, the first of the month being too wet and the last
part too dry. The corn crop is very poor in all sections except the Southwest, and even in that district is
not up to the average. In many sections the plants are twisting and yellowing. The August ist condition
of 67% indicates a production of 35,745,000 bushels compared with 53,563,000 bushels last year. The wheat
crop turned out better than was expected, but the indicated production of 9,628,000 bushels is less than the
11.145.000 bushels raised last year and the five year average of 10,824,000 bushels. However, the increase
in price has added considerably to the value of the 1924 crop, the average farm price on July 15th this year
being $1.20 per bushel in comparison with $ 1.12 last year. Fruit crops promise much better than average
yields in Virginia, in spite of a heavy drop during July in the commercial apple regions. Owing to dry
weather late in July and early August peaches are not as large as had been expected, but the production is
greater than usual. Commercial orchards are shipping the early varieties. The production of grapes, pears
and blackberries is much above the average, but watermelon and cantaloupe yields will be less. The outlook
for peanuts is uncertain. While the August ist condition is poor, most of the crop was well worked and
will make considerable improvement if favorable weather comes. The August ist condition of 65% indi­
cates a yield of 78,546,000 pounds compared with 122,760,000 pounds last year. A very large crop of hay
has been saved, especially in the Shenandoah Valley and the Southwest, but the outlook for the late hay crop,
such as cowpeas, soy beans and millet, is not promising as dry weather has retarded growth.
North Carolina’s corn crop this year is expected to yield 45,918,000 bushels, in comparison with 58,500.000 bushels gathered in 1923. The reduction is chiefly due to excessive rains early in July. Fields are
grassy and plants are earing poorly. Many interior counties have very good corn prospects on stiff lands,
however. Wheat and rye yields were much better than expected, many sections reporting the largest wheat
yields per acre on record in the state. Peanuts declined in condition during July, dropping from 84% to
70%, the August ist condition indicating a production of 130,830,000 pounds, a reduction of 22,170,000
pounds under the 1923 production. During the first half of August the crop made considerable improve­
ment, however, and the plants have good color and size. The fruit outlook continues good and peach ship­
ments are quite active in the Sand Hill territory. A good apple production is expected in mountain coun­
ties. Record shipments of truck were made from the eastern counties and weather conditions are favorable
for the growing truck. North Carolina farmers used fertilizer freely this year, but the heavy rains washed
much of it out of thin soils.




6

The hot, dry weather following the excessive rains during the first two weeks of July caused consid­
erable deterioration in practically all crops in South Carolina, cotton being the only crop that benefited. The
condition of corn dropped from 80% on July 1st to 70% on August 1st. The indicated yield is now 28,000,000 bushels in comparison with appriximately 33,000,000 bushels produced last year. The indicated
yield of peanuts in South Carolina is 27,907,000 pounds this year in comparison with 32,500,000 pounds last
year. Cowpeas, velvet beans, soy beans, hay, sweet potatoes and sorghum for syrup showred an average con­
dition on August 1st about ten points below the average condition on July 1st.

BUILDING OPERATIONS FOR THE MONTHS OF JULY, 1924 AND 1923.
Permits Issued
New Construction
CITIES

New
1924 1923

z

1924

1923

1923

1924

1924

MARYLAND

1 Baltimore.............
2 Cumberland.........

3 Frederick..............
4 Hagerstown*
VIRGINIA
5 Lynchburg............
6 Norfolk................
7 Petersburg..........
8 Richmond.............
9 Roanoke...............
WEST VIRGINIA
10 Bluefield...............
11 Charleston............
12 Clarksburg............
13 Huntington..........
14 Parkersburg.........
NORTH CAROLINA
15 Asheville..............
16 Charlotte..............
17 Durham................
18 Greensboro ..........
19 High P oint..........
20 Raleigh.................
21 Salisbury..............
22 Wilmington..........
23 Winston-Salem
SOUTH CAROLINA
24 Charleston............
25 Columbia..............
26 Greenville............
27 Spartanburg........
D1ST. OF COLUMBIA
28 Washington..........

448
36

2

35

Increase or Per Cent
of
Decrease Increase
Total
or
Valuation
Decrease

Alterations

Repairs

497 1,459
24
13
2
7
13

948 $ 3,385,920 $ 3,941,240
67,781
65,850
17
7,350
22,075
8

$ 770,640
18,865
1,700

66,200

1923

2

$ 855,360 $— 640,040 — 13.3% 1
9,442
7,492
9.7
2
7,460 — 20,485 — 69.4
3

4

117
91

30
40
5
84
38 i

23
79
9
96
53

39,877
591,888
35,121
603,702
278,136

31,740
229,365
19,100
624,767
172,860

86,413
175,794
2,944
439,472
17,560

77,510
37,082
4,263
210,471
23,750

17,040
501,235
14,702
207,936
99,086

15.6
188.1
62.9
24.9
50.4

47
74
43
150
31

14
30
18
26
7

5
25
19
26

95,850
170,344
93,325
431,635
83,800

128,125
325,834
95,215
400,760
75,000

48,675
75,510
6,470
44,625

2,150
52,390
17,585
14,065
50,000

14,250
— 132,370 —
— 13,005 —
61,435
— 29,000 —

10.9
35.0
11.5
14.8
23.2

55
53
28
90
55
**57

82

59
14

458,723
269,585
67,000
225,315
133,350
685,097
103,125
130,300
152,865

720,378
694,900
109,550
217,334
109,025
**108,452
32,110

17,470
18,175
1,800
26,675
6,365

100,000

0

262,860

50
42,300
58,503

4,700
16,960

81,175
56,350
129,175
11,260

9,420
36,661
23,375
62,870

19,045
34,920
39,090
8,290

2,187,960

421,515

502,036

Totals........ 1,895 1,967 2,930 2,196 $14,632,103 $10,966,391

$2,427,247

19

120
15
141
79

20

50
35
115
28
37
52
14

66
46

86
22
21
61
3

20
102
6

20

15
57

27

2
1
10

0

87

48

25

300

257

797

22

10

19
14

13
85
13
27

21
10

5
19

12
2

10

11
4
75

11
43

2,900
77,580
71,775
247,795

531

6,123,895

73

20

112,000

12,200

1,200

19,100
13,150
18,490
9,325

— 344,185 — 42.0
— 426,240 — 59.7
— 53,900 — 43.9
16,166
6.9
21,365
18.1
577,845 532.8
71,065 221.3
55,900
47.9
— 68,452 — 24.5
—

87,900 — 87.7
22,971
25.2
— 73,115 — 43.5
291,115 1,489.1
3,855,414

$2,146,634 $ 3,946,325

143.3

5

6

7

8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

20
21
22
23

24
25
26
27
28

30.1*

*Hagerstown figures not included in totals,
**Includes both new work and repairs.
—Denotes decrease.
NOTE--The figures in the above table reflect the amount of work provided for in the corporation limits of the several
cities, but take no account of suburban developments.

The number of building permits issued in twenty-seven cities in the Fifth Federal Reserve District
showed a seasonal decline in July in comparison with June, and also fell slightly under the number of per­
mits issued for new construction in July 1923. Total valuation figures for new work were slightly lower
in July than in June, but were considerably higher than in July last year. The twenty-seven cities for
which comparable figures for both 1924 and 1923 are available reported 1,895 permits for new work in July,
with estimated valuation of $14,632,103, compared with 2,103 permits valued at $15,605,890 issued in June
of this year and 1,967 permits valued at $10,966,391 issued in July last year. Alteration and repair permits
issued in July totaled 2,930 and the estimated valuation was $2,427,247, compared with 2,563 permits and
$2,716,103 reported in June 1924 and 2,196 permits and $2,146,634 reported in July 1923. Total valuation
for both new construction and alterations and repairs amounted to $17,059,350 in July, $18,321,993 in June,
and $13,113,025 in July 1923. Sixteen of the twenty-seven cities showed higher valuation figures in July
this year than last year, and eleven cities showed a larger number of permits for new work. Strikingly large
increases in valuation were reported by Norfolk, Raleigh, Salisbury, Spartanburg and Washington, all in­
creasing more than 100%.




7

FIGURES ON RETAIL TRADE
As Indicated By Reports from Twenty-nine Representative Department Stores
for the Month of July, 1924.
Baltimore
Percentage increase in net sales during
July 1924, compared with July 1923—..........

Richmond

—

4.2

Washington

5.9

6.6

2.9

Other
Cities

District

0.3

3.3

5.7

3.6

2.0

— 2.8

4.7

—

Percentage increase in net sales during July
1924, compared with average sales during
the corresponding month of 1920,1921 and
1922....................................................................

—

0.9

33.3

Percentage increase in stocks on hand at
the end of July 1924, over stocks on
hand at the end of July 1923........................

—

6.4

8.6

—

2.7

Percentage increase in stocks on hand at
the end of July 1924, over stocks on
hand at the end of June 1924........................

— 8.0

— 4.7

—

7.1

Percentage of average stocks on hand at
the end of each month since July 1, 1924,
to average net sales each month during
the same period, one month..........................

470.4

416.5

461.3

586.0

475.1

Percentage of outstanding orders at the end
of July 1924, to total purchases of
merchandise during the year 1923.................

6.8

8.2

5.5

6.8

6.5

—

—

7.0

—Denotes Decrease.

Department store sales in the Fifth District showed an average increase of 3.3% during July 1924 in
comparison with sales in July last year, Baltimore stores reporting an average gain of 4.2%, Washington
stores a gain of 6.6%, and the group of Other Cities a gain of three-tenths of one per cent, while Richmond
stores averaged a decline of 5.9%. In comparison with average July sales during the three years 1920-1922,
inclusive, sales in July this year were nine-tenths of one per cent less in Baltimore and 5.7% in the Other
Cities, but were 33.3% greater in Richmond and 2.9% greater in Washington, the District average show­
ing an increase of 3.6% . Stocks on hand at the end of July were 6.4% less valuable than stocks on hand a
year ago in Baltimore and 2.7% less in Washington, but Richmond stocks were 8.6% more valuable and the
Other Cities group showed an increase of 2.0%, the District average being a decline of 2.8% * During the
past month stocks on hand declined 8.0% in Baltimore, 4.7% in Richmond, 7.1% in Washington, and 4.7%
in the Other Cities, averaging a decline of 7.0% for the District. The percentage of average stock on hand
at the end of July to average net sales during the same month was 475.1 % for the District, Richmond
reporting the lowest figure, 416.5%. Outstanding orders for merchandise at the end of July amounted to
6.5 % of total 1923 purchases, Richmond showing the highest percentage and Washington the lowest.

WHOLESALE TRADE
July 1924.
The accompanying table shows percentage increases or decreases in sales made by 107 wholesale firms
in six lines during the month of July 1924, compared (1) with sales made in June 1924 and (2) with sales
in July 1923. Also, increases or decreases in stocks on hand July 31st are compared with stocks on hand
at the end of June this year and at the end of July last year. Two grocery firms, two shoe firms and one
drug firm have not sent in their July figures at the time of compiling the averages, the delays probably
being due to vacation absences in the offices of the missing firms.
The table shows that sales increased in July in comparison with June in dry goods, hardware, furni­
ture and drugs, but declined in grocery lines and in shoes. In comparison with July 1923, sales in July
this year were greater in furniture and drug lines, but were less in groceries, dry goods, shoes and hard­
ware.
Stocks on hand increased during July in dry goods, hardware and furniture, but dropped slightly in
grocery and shoe houses. In comparison with stocks on hand a year ago, July 31, 1923, stocks carried
on July 31st this year were greater in groceries but were less in dry goods, shoes, hardware and furniture,
dry goods and shoes showing decreases of 12,5% and 1 3. 1 %, respectively.




8

Groceries

Dry Goods

Shoes

Hardware

12

12

43

Percentage increase (or decrease) in net
sales during July 1924, compared with
sales during June 1924 ...................................

— 2.6

25.8

—12.9

6.3

25.1

6.4

Percentage increase (or decrease) in net
sales during July 1924, compared with
sales during July 1923...................................

— 4.2

—17.8

—19.3

— 9.0

13.4

6.1

Percentage increase (or decrease) in stocks
on hand July 31, 1924, compared with
June 30, 1924....................................................

-

1.1(11)

3.3(8)

3.5 (8)

—12.5(7)

-

18

Drugs

Number of reporting firms in each line............

Percentage increase (or decrease) in stocks
on hand July 31, 1924, compared with
July 31, 1923....................................................

15

Furniture

1.5(6)

—13.1(5)

7

6.3(5)

-

3.4(4)

13.5(3)

-

5.1(2)

—Denotes decreased percentage.
NOTE:-The number of firms reporting stock figures for the dates compared is shown in parenthesis immediately after the
percentage figure.

Collections are distinctly slower than a year ago, when 85.7% of the reporting firms classified col­
lections as either Good or Fair in comparison with 76.5% so classifying them at the end of July this
year. Ninety-eight identical firms reported on collections in both July 1923 and July 1924, the classifica­
tions being as follows:
Lines
Groceries.....................
Dry Goods ................
Shoes ...........................
Hardware ..................
Furniture ..................
Drugs .........................
July Totals .........




Collections in July Reported as
Good
Fair
Slow
Poor
Total
1924-1923
1924-1923
1924-1923
1924-1923
1924-1923
8
6
28
29
6 7
0 0
42
42
1 2
8 9
5 3
0 0
14
14
0 0
4 8
5 2
1 0
10
10
2 3
7 8
4 2
0 0
13
13
1 2
5 5
1 0
0 0
7
7
4
4_________7
8_______ 1
o_______ o
o________ 12
12
16
17
59
67
22
14
1 0
98
98

(Compiled August 21, 1924.)

9

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.
Compiled by the FederallReserve Board.

Production in basis industries, after a considerable decline in recent months, was maintained in July
at the same level as in June. Factory employment continued to decline. Wholesale prices increased for
the first time since early in the year, reflecting chiefly the advance in the prices of farm products.

PRODUCTION— The Federal Reserve Board’s index of production in basic industries, which had
declined 22 percent between February and June, remained practically unchanged during July. Iron and
steel and woolen industries showed further curtailment, while production of flour, cement, coal and cop­
per was larger than in June. Factory employment decreased 4 percent in July owing to further reduction
of forces in the textile, metal and automobile industries. Building contract awards showed more than the
usual seasonal decline in July, but were 10 percent larger than a year ago. Crop conditions, as reported
by the Department of Agriculture, were higher on August 1st than a month earlier. Estimated production
of nearly all of the principal crops except tobacco was larger than in July and the yields of wheat, oats, rye
and cotton are expected to be considerably larger than last year.
TRADE— Railroad shipments increased in July owing to larger loadings of miscellaneous merchandise,
grain and coal. Wholesale trade was 3 percent larger than in June, owing to increased sales of meat, dry
goods and drugs, but was 3 percent smaller than a year ago. Retail trade showed the usual seasonal de­
cline in July, and department store sales were 1 percent greater and mail order sales 7 percent less than
a year ago. Merchandise stocks at department stores continued to decline during July and were only
slightly larger at the end of the month than a year earlier.
PRICES— Wholesale prices, as measured by the index of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, increased
more than 1 percent in July. Prices of farm products, foods and clothing increased, while prices of build­
ing materials again declined sharply and prices of metals, fuel and house furnishings also decreased. Dur­
ing the first half of August quotations on corn, beef, sugar, silk, copper, rubber and anthracite advanced,
while prices of cotton, flour and bricks declined.
BANK CREDIT— Commercial loans of member banks in leading cities, owing partly to seasonal in­
fluences, increased considerably early in August. Loans secured by stocks and bonds and investments
continued to increase, so that at the middle of August total loans and investments of those banks were
larger than at any previous time. Further growth of demand deposits carried them also to the highest
level on record. Between the middle of July and the middle of August, Federal Reserve Bank discounts
for member banks declined further and their holdings of Acceptances decreased somewhat. United States
security holdings increased, however, and total earning assets of Federal Reserve Banks remained prac­
tically unchanged. Continued easing in money rates in the New York market during July and early August
is indicated by a decline of one-fourth of one percent in prevailing rates for commercial paper to 3-3%
percent. After the middle of August there was some advance in open market rates for Bankers Accep­
tances and short term Government securities. During August the discount rate at the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York was reduced from 3 y2 to 3 percent and at the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and San
Francisco from 4 to 33^ percent.




10

CHARTS SUPPLEMENTING TEXT ON PAGE 10
PRODUCTION IN BASIC INDUSTRIES
pc

Index of 22 basic commodities corrected for

occur

WHOLESALE PRICES

pctfeem

Index of U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
■(1913*=100, base adopted by Bureau) Latest figure
—July 147.

seasonal variation (1919-100). Latest Figure-*
July 94.

FACTORY EMPLOYMENT
PCSam
ISO

W C fN T

*50

V

Iw

so

IL

50

0
1919

1920

1921

1922

1923

192*

Weekly figures for member banks in 101
leading cities. Latest figures—August 14th.

Index of 33 manufacturing industries (1919»
100). Latest figure—July 87.




11




FIFTH

12